RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 1 of 20
Soil Erosion
Sheet and Rill Erosion
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Permanent ground cover > 90% and slope less than 10%; OR, Thewater erosion rate is less than or equal to T.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Plant cover controls active erosion (shallow less than 1 foot deep rillsand gullies) and runoff from normal rain events; AND, No litter damsor terracettes are present.
Yes No
Wind Erosion
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Permanent ground cover >90% and slope less than 10%; OR, Thewind erosion rate is less than or equal to T.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The areas integrated with trees are covered with leaves, needles, finewoody debris, rocks, and/or herbaceous vegetation that protects thesoil on more than 90% of the area.
Yes No
Residual forage heights meet or exceed the State standards forcontrolling wind erosion.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 2 of 20
Classic Gully Erosion
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Classic gullies are not present; Or, Classic gully management isadequate to stop the progression of head cutting and widening andoffsite impacts are minimized by vegetation and/or structures.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Classic Gullies are not present; Or, All classic gullies are stabilized;AND, All areas expected to have high erosion rates are stable.
Yes No
Streambank, Shoreline, Water Conveyance Channels
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
For shorelines and water conveyance channels; banks are stable orcommensurate with normal geomorphological processes; AND, Ifbank erosion is present, it is beyond the client's control orcommensurate with normal geomorphological processes; AND, Forstreambanks, SVAP2 bank condition element score > 5. If shorelinesor water conveyance channels are not present, set this planning criteriato NA.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Excluding all fundamentally unstable, natural geomorphicstreambanks and shorelines, all streambanks and shorelines on the landuse show few signs of erosion or bank failure; AND, Each is stableand protected with natural materials. If shorelines and waterconveyance channels do not exist on the land management system, setthis test statement to NA.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 3 of 20
Soil Quality Degradation
Organic Matter Depletion
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Organic matter within the soil does not cause resource concerns orresource management issues. Determined and documented by on-siteevaluation methods.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
There are no areas of extensive bare ground, or largely unvegetatedareas. Vegetation and organic matter are managed appropriately.
Yes No
Compaction
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Soil compaction is not a problem: AND, Activities do not cause soilcompaction problems AND can be documented with priorconservation planning or other on-site evaluation methods.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Soil compaction is limited to roads, trails, and landings; AND, Roads,trails, and landings are properly maintained as to not cause associatedresource concerns.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 4 of 20
Subsidence
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Histisols are managed so as to not exhibit signs of subsidence.Determined and documented with soil survey documentation or otheron-site evaluation methods.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The forest O horizon is covered with leaves, needles, fine woodydebris, rocks, and/or herbaceous vegetation that protects the soil onmore than 90% of the area. There is no artificial drainage operating onthe site. If histisols are not present on this land management system,set the test statement to NA.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 5 of 20
Excess Water
Seeps
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Seeps are managed to prevent significant impacts to conservationmeasures and/or sensitive habitat. If seeps do not exist, set thisplanning criteria to NA.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Excess water seepage is controlled to the point that is does not restrictland use or management goals. If seeps do not exist on the landmanagement system, set this test statement to NA.
Yes No
Runoff and Flooding and Ponding
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Runoff, flooding, and ponding is managed to minimize the impact onconservation measures and/or sensitive habitat.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Runoff, flooding, and ponding is managed to minimize the impact onconservation measures and/or sensitive habitat.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 6 of 20
Insufficient Water
Inefficient Use of Irrigation Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
The irrigation system components and management result in a FarmIrrigation Rating Index > 60; AND, Meets applicable State in-streamflow and lake and pond water levels requirements. If the landmanagement system is not irrigated, or equipment on this landmanagement system is not used to irrigate, set this planning criteria toNA.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
An irrigation water management (IWM) plan is followed that meetsthe crop's needs, while maximizing irrigation water efficiency. TheIWM plan schedules water application based on soil moisturemonitoring and/or evapotranspiration monitoring, measures andrecords the amount of water used to irrigate, and the irrigationsystem's distribution uniformity has been evaluated and necessarychanges were made. If the land management system is not irrigated, orequipment on this land management system is not used to irrigate, setthis test statement to NA.
Yes No
Inefficient Moisture Management
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Moisture management is not a problem and activities do not causeinefficient moisture management problems. Soil loss is less than orequal to T.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Plant species are suitable for the site and moisture management is nota problem; And, Management activities do not cause inefficientmoisture management problems.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 7 of 20
Water Quality Degradation
Pesticides in Surface Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Pesticides are stored, handled, disposed and applied to prevent runoff,spills, leaks and leaching; AND, Conservation practices andtechniques are in place to minimize ground water impacts.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Pesticides are not applied or stored on this land management system;Or,' Pesticides are applied using a site-specific mixture of prevention,avoidance, monitoring, and suppression (PAMS) strategies.Environmental risk screening tool are used (such as WIN-PST orsimilar LGU approved tool); AND, application rates and timing arecompliant with the label.
Yes No
Pesticides in Ground Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Pesticides are stored, handled, disposed and applied to prevent runoff,spills, leaks and leaching; AND, Conservation practices andtechniques are in place to minimize ground water impacts.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Pesticides are not applied or stored on this land management system;OR, Pesticides are applied using a site-specific mixture of prevention,avoidance, monitoring, and suppression (PAMS) strategies; AND,Environmental risk screening tool are used (such as WIN-PST orsimilar LGU approved tool); AND, Application rates and timing arecompliant with the label.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 8 of 20
Nutrients in Surface Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Nutrient and amendment applications are based on soil or tissue testsand nutrient budgets for realistic yields; AND, conservation practicesand managements are in place to minimize ground water impacts.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The land adjacent to a stream, river, or other waterbody on the side orsides you control: - has diverse, natural plant cover typical to thatalong other streams within the drainage basin; - extend from thestream bank/shoreline for a distance of 35 feet; OR, (if applicable) Theminimum State buffer-width requirement, whichever is greater; AND,Have few places where concentrated runoff flows through.
Yes No
Filter strips that are at least 30 feet wide are established andmaintained on all areas in the land management system where filterstrips are applicable.
Yes No
Livestock access to streams is limited to short periods of time andsmall areas.
Yes No
Excess Pathogens and Chemicals from Manure, Bio-solids or Compost Applicationsin Surface Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Potential sources of pathogens or pharmaceuticals are not applied onthe land; OR, Organic materials are applied, stored, and/or handled tomitigate negative impacts to surface water sources.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Livestock access to stream is controlled; OR, Livestock are limited tosmall watering or crossing areas.
Yes No
Filter strips that are at least 30 feet wide are established andmaintained on all areas in the land management system where filterstrips are applicable.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 9 of 20
Petroleum, Heavy Metal and Other Pollutants Transported to Surface Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Activities do not present the potential for contamination by petroleum,heavy metals and other pollutants. If present, potential pollutants arestored and handled to avoid runoff to groundwater.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Fuel storage does not occur on this land management system; OR, Ifrequired, the producer has and is following a Spill Prevention, Control,and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan; OR, The fuel storage area and tankis located: - above the 100-year floodplain, - a minimum of 100 feetfrom any river, stream, ditch, pond, lake, sinkhole, wetland, or waterwell; AND, Within a stable place designed to provide secondarycontainment if the primary means were to fail.
Yes No
Petroleum, Heavy Metal and Other Pollutants Transported to Ground Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Activities do not present the potential for contamination by petroleum,heavy metals and other pollutants. If present, potential pollutants arestored and handled to avoid seepage to groundwater.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Fuel storage does not occur on this land management system; OR, Ifrequired, the producer has and is following a Spill Prevention, Control,and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan; OR, The fuel storage area and tankis located: - above the 100-year floodplain, - a minimum of 100 feetfrom any river, stream, ditch, pond, lake, sinkhole, wetland, or waterwell; AND, Within a stable place designed to provide secondarycontainment if the primary means were to fail.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 10 of 20
Excessive Sediment in Surface Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
There are no untreated sources of erosion and streams or shoreline arenot on or adjacent to site; OR, Upslope treatment and buffer practicesaddress concentrated flows to water bodies; AND, Heavy use areas arestable; AND, The SVAP2 - bank condition is >= 5.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The land adjacent to a stream, river, or other waterbody on the side orsides you control does: - have diverse, natural plant cover typical tothat along streams in your area, - extend from the streambank/shoreline for a distance of 35 feet or (if applicable) the minimumState buffer-width requirement, whichever is greater; AND, Have fewplaces where concentrated runoff flows through.
Yes No
Drainage and erosion control measures are implemented on roads,trails and landings to minimize detrimental effects of concentratedflow, erosion and sedimentation; AND, Stream crossings are restoredand stabilized.
Yes No
All temporary or permanent rills and gullies are stabilized; OR,Temporary or permanent rills and gullies do not exist.
Yes No
Established filter strips are at least 20 feet wide and maintained whenfilter strips are applicable. If filter strips are not applicable on this landmanagement system, set the test statement to NA.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 11 of 20
Elevated Water Temperature
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Water courses on or adjacent to the site are not designated by a StateAgency as a temperature impairment; OR, The SVAP2 - riparian areaquality element score is >= 5; AND, The SVAP2 - riparian areaquantity element score is >= 5; AND, The SVAP2 - canopy coverelement score is >= 6; OR, Existing conservation practices are in placeto address water temperature. If water courses are not present, set thisplanning criteria to NA.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
More than 50% of the water surface is shaded on the length of thestream/river for this land management system. If waterbodies are notpresent on this land management system, set the test statement to NA.
Yes No
Surface water temperatures do not limit use for fish, wildlife,invertebrates, or other intended purposes. If waterbodies are notpresent on this land management system, set the test statement to NA.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 12 of 20
Air Quality Impacts
Emissions of Particulate Matter (PM) and PM Precursors
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Management activities do not contribute to agricultural sourceparticulate matter (PM) or PM precursor emissions; AND,documented episodes or complaints of emissions of PM (dust, smoke,exhaust, etc.), or chemical drift have not occurred. PM producingactivity examples are: Prescribed Burn is conducted, Travel waysunpaved or untreated with binding agents, Engines (combustionsource), Tillage, Pesticides are applied, Fertilization (manure/commercial), CAFO/manure management.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Dust is controlled on all non-vegetated, unpaved travel ways. Ifnon-vegetated or unpaved travel ways are not used or planned, set thistest statement to YES.
Yes No
Objectionable Odors
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Activities such as pesticide or manure application are managed toreduce objectionable odors; AND, Odor sources are not regulated inthis planning area; AND, Documented episodes or complaints of odornuisance have not occurred.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Manure is not applied on this land management system; OR, manure isimmediately incorporated; OR, manure is only applied when winddirection is away from human occupied areas.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 13 of 20
Degraded Plant Condition
Undesirable Plant Productivity and Health
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Plants are adapted to the site, meet production goals, and do notnegatively impact other resources; AND, Plant damage from winderosion is below crop damage tolerance levels.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Plant yield, vigor, and quality are as expected. Yes No
Inadequate Structure and Composition
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Plant communities contain adequate diversity, composition andstructure to support desired ecological functions for the ecological site.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The current plants provide the desired habitat structure andcomposition. State identified invasive plants and noxious weeds arecontrolled.
Yes No
Excessive Plant Pest Pressure
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Plant pest damage to plants is below economic or environmentalthresholds; AND, plant pests, including noxious and invasive speciesare managed.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Invasive and noxious weeds are controlled or are not present. Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 14 of 20
Wildfire Hazard, Excessive Biomass Accumulation
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Wildfire hazards is not a concern; OR, Fuel loads and fuel ladders aremanaged to provide defensible space.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Wildfire risk to sensitive sites are controlled by treatment, removal ormodification of vegetation, debris and detritus in a strip or area.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 15 of 20
Fish and Wildlife - Inadequate Habitat
Inadequate Habitat - Food
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
The WHSI rating is >= 0.5; AND, (when surface stream present) TheSVAP2 - fish habitat complexity element score is >= 7; AND, TheSVAP2 - aquatic invertebrate habitat element score is >= 7; OR,Conservation practices and managements are in place that meet orexceed species or guild-specific habitat model thresholds; OR, Food isavailable in quality and extent to support habitat requirements for thespecies of interest.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Designated areas are planted as food and habitat forpollinators/beneficial insects; AND, Protected from disruption. Forexample, planted to nectar and pollen producing plants and protectedfrom disruption - chemical, biological, or mechanical.
Yes No
Plants growing are expected, desired, and suited to the site. Existingforbs and woody species meet state specified amounts.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 16 of 20
Inadequate Habitat - Cover/Shelter
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
The WHSI rating is >= 0.5; AND, (when surface stream present) theSVAP2 - barriers to movement element score is >= 7; AND, theSVAP2 - fish habitat complexity element score is >= 7; AND, theSVAP2 - aquatic invertebrate habitat element score is >= 7; ORconservation practices and management practices are in place thatmeet or exceed species or guild-specific habitat model thresholds; OR,habitat cover is of available quality and extent to support requirementsfor the species of interest.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Plant growth and cover is managed to develop and maintain habitat tohelp chosen wildlife species. (see State Wildlife Action Plan)
Yes No
The pond/lake, which supports a natural or planted fish population, ismanaged: -to exclude livestock, -to control nuisance species andundesirable aquatic vegetation controlled, -to complies with state andlocal regulations when stocking the pond, AND -use of a buffer zoneof diverse, natural plant cover at least 35 feet wide.
Yes No
Designated areas are planted as food and habitat forpollinators/beneficial insects. For example, planted to nectar andpollen producing plants and protected from disruption--chemical,biological, or mechanical.
Yes No
The stream(s) have: - a natural, unaltered configuration, with minimalchannel straightening, dredging, or bank alteration by armoring withrip-rap or other non-natural materials, - stable banks with limitederosion or bank failure; AND, human uses and/or grazing levels thatdo not negatively impact bank condition. If streams are not present onthe land management system, set the test statement to NA.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 17 of 20
Inadequate Habitat - Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
The WHSI rating is >= 0.5;AND, (when surface stream present) TheSVAP2 - aquatic invertebrate habitat element score is >= 7; OR,Conservation practices and managements are in place that meet orexceed species or guild-specific habitat model thresholds; OR, Wateris available in quality and extent to support habitat requirements forthe species of interest.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Water for habitat is accessible and at the right depth, duration, andtime of year for chosen wildlife species (See State Wildlife ActionPlan)
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 18 of 20
Inadequate Habitat - Habitat Continuity (Space)
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
The WHSI rating is >= 0.5; AND, (when surface stream present) TheSVAP2 - barriers to movement element score is >= 7; AND, TheSVAP2 - aquatic invertebrate habitat element score is >= 7; OR,Conservation practices and managements are in place that meet orexceed species or guild-specific habitat model thresholds; OR, Theconnectivity of habitat components are adequate to support stablepopulations of target species.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Existing fences allow wildlife movement without harm. Yes No
Connectivity between food resources and cover and shelter is providedfor the target wildlife species. (see State Wildlife Action Plan)
Yes No
The land adjacent to a stream, river, or other waterbody on the side orsides you control does: - have diverse, natural plant cover typical tothat along streams in your area; AND, Extend from the stream bank orshoreline for a distance of 35 feet; OR, (if applicable) The minimumState buffer-width requirement, whichever is greater.
Yes No
Designated areas are planted as habitat for pollinators and beneficialinsects. Non-cropped area protected from disruption during nestingand foraging periods--chemical, biological, or mechanical.
Yes No
In-stream structures (i.e. dam, diversion structure, bridge, culvert,low-water stream crossing, etc.) allow for the upstream anddownstream movement of fish and other aquatic animals throughoutmost of the year.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 19 of 20
Livestock Production Limitation
Inadequate Feed and Forage
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Livestock forage, roughage, and supplemental nutritional requirementsare met.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The existing forage quantity and quality are expected to meet thelivestock needs and goals.
Yes No
Inadequate Shelter
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Artificial or natural shelters meet animal health needs. Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Adequate shelter is provided to meet the needs of the livestockthroughout the period the land management system (LMS) is utilizedby livestock. If livestock do not use this LMS, set the test statement toNA.
Yes No
Inadequate Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Water of acceptable quality and quantity is adequately distributed tomeet animal needs.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The livestock have enough drinking water of good quality. If livestockdo not use this land management system, set the test statement to NA.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Associated Ag Land
Page 20 of 20
Inefficient Energy Use
Equipment and Facilities
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
If equipment, motors, pumps, etc. are used or located on AssociatedAgricultural Land (AAL), are they commercially available improvedefficiency models or have they received manufacturer approvedupgrades.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Pumps, motors, wells, etc. located on the land management system areimproved efficiency models.
Yes No
Energy conserving implements are used for all or some fieldoperations.
Yes No
Farming/Ranching Practices and Field Operations
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Equipment or implements used on Associated Agricultural Land(AAL) for agricultural uses are improved efficiency models.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Pumps, motors, wells, etc. located on the land management system areimproved efficiency models
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 1 of 21
Soil Erosion
Sheet and Rill Erosion
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Permanent ground cover > 90% and slope less than 10%; OR, Thewater erosion rate is less than or equal to T.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
All non-traffic areas are vegetated. Yes No
All temporary or permanent rills and gullies are stabilized. All areasexpected to have high erosion rates are stable.
Yes No
Wind Erosion
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Permanent ground cover >90% and slope less than 10%; OR, Thewind erosion rate is less than or equal to T.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The areas integrated with trees are covered with leaves, needles, finewoody debris, rocks, and/or herbaceous vegetation that protects thesoil on more than 90% of the area.
Yes No
All non-traffic areas are vegetated. Yes No
All temporary or permanent rills and gullies are stabilized. All areasexpected to have high erosion rates are stable.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 2 of 21
Classic Gully Erosion
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Classic gullies are not present; Or, Classic gully management isadequate to stop the progression of head cutting and widening andoffsite impacts are minimized by vegetation and/or structures.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Water runoff from hard surfaces, such as building roofs, is controlledto the point that is does not cause erosion or large streams of water.
Yes No
Classic Gullies are not present; Or, All classic gullies are stabilized;AND, All areas expected to have high erosion rates are stable.
Yes No
Streambank, Shoreline, Water Conveyance Channels
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
For shorelines and water conveyance channels; banks are stable orcommensurate with normal geomorphological processes; AND, Ifbank erosion is present, it is beyond the client's control orcommensurate with normal geomorphological processes; AND, Forstreambanks, SVAP2 bank condition element score > 5. If shorelinesor water conveyance channels are not present, set this planning criteriato NA.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Excluding all fundamentally unstable, natural geomorphicstreambanks and shorelines, all streambanks and shorelines on the landuse show few signs of erosion or bank failure; AND, Each is stableand protected with natural materials. If shorelines and waterconveyance channels do not exist on the land management system, setthis test statement to NA.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 3 of 21
Soil Quality Degradation
Organic Matter Depletion
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Organic matter within the soil does not cause resource concerns orresource management issues. Determined and documented by on-siteevaluation methods.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
There are no areas of extensive bare ground, or largely unvegetatedareas. Vegetation and organic matter are managed appropriately.
Yes No
Compaction
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Soil compaction is not a problem: AND, Activities do not cause soilcompaction problems AND can be documented with priorconservation planning or other on-site evaluation methods.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Soil compaction is limited to roads, trails, and landings; AND, Roads,trails, and landings are properly maintained as to not cause associatedresource concerns.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 4 of 21
Subsidence
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Histisols are managed so as to not exhibit signs of subsidence.Determined and documented with soil survey documentation or otheron-site evaluation methods.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Areas of organic soils are avoided during all farmstead activities. Ifhistisols are not mapped on this land management system, set the teststatement to NA.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 5 of 21
Excess Water
Runoff and Flooding and Ponding
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Runoff, flooding, and ponding is managed to minimize the impact onconservation measures and/or farmstead areas.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Water runoff from hard surfaces, such as building roofs, is controlledto the point that it does not cause damaging runoff, flooding orponding.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 6 of 21
Insufficient Water
Inefficient Moisture Management
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Moisture management is not a problem and activities do not causeinefficient moisture management problems. Soil loss is less than orequal to T.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Plant species are suitable for the site and moisture management is nota problem; And, Management activities do not cause inefficientmoisture management problems.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 7 of 21
Water Quality Degradation
Nutrients in Ground water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Liquid manure is not stored; OR, Liquid manure storages have a linerto reduce seepage to groundwater sources.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Liquid manure is not stored; OR, liquid manure storages have a linerto reduce seepage to groundwater sources.
Yes No
Pesticides in Surface Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Pesticides are stored, handled, disposed and applied to prevent runoff,spills, leaks and leaching; AND, Conservation practices andtechniques are in place to minimize ground water impacts.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Pesticides are stored, handled, and disposed to prevent runoff, spills,leaks and leaching.
Yes No
Pesticides are not applied or stored on this land management system;Or,' Pesticides are applied using a site-specific mixture of prevention,avoidance, monitoring, and suppression (PAMS) strategies.Environmental risk screening tool are used (such as WIN-PST orsimilar LGU approved tool); AND, application rates and timing arecompliant with the label.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 8 of 21
Pesticides in Ground Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Pesticides are stored, handled, disposed and applied to prevent runoff,spills, leaks and leaching; AND, Conservation practices andtechniques are in place to minimize ground water impacts.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Pesticides are not applied or stored on this land management system;OR, Pesticides are applied using a site-specific mixture of prevention,avoidance, monitoring, and suppression (PAMS) strategies; AND,Environmental risk screening tool are used (such as WIN-PST orsimilar LGU approved tool); AND, Application rates and timing arecompliant with the label.
Yes No
Pesticides are stored, handled, disposed and applied to prevent runoff,spills, leaks and leaching; AND, Conservation practices andtechniques are in place to minimize ground water impacts.
Yes No
Nutrients in Surface Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Organic or inorganic nutrients are not applied and AFO/CAFO is notpresent; OR, Nutrient and amendment applications are based on soil ortissue tests and nutrient budgets for realistic yields; AND, Manure ismanaged and stored to eliminate off-site movement; AND,Conservation practices and management activitiess are in place tominimize surface water impacts.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Sacrifice areas are properly sited. Yes No
Manure and untreated runoff from animal pens, feedlots, or similarAFO/CAFO is stopped from entering nearby streams, drainageditches, and irrigation ditches.
Yes No
Livestock access to streams is limited to short periods of time andsmall areas.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 9 of 21
Excess Pathogens and Chemicals from Manure, Bio-solids or Compost Applicationsin Surface Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Potential sources of pathogens or pharmaceuticals are not applied onthe land; OR, Organic materials are applied, stored, and/or handled tomitigate negative impacts to surface water sources.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Water well(s) does not exist; OR, Any water well(s) is located at least100 feet from animal pens, feedlots, or similar AFO/CAFO; OR,Runoff from these areas is treated; OR, An impervious barrier aroundthe well prevents seepage into the surface water.
Yes No
Animal pens, feedlots, or similar AFO/CAFO do not exist on the landmanagement system; OR, Manure and untreated runoff from animalpens, feedlots, or similar AFO/CAFO is stopped from entering nearbystreams, drainage ditches, and irrigation ditches.
Yes No
Livestock access to stream is controlled; OR, Livestock are limited tosmall watering or crossing areas.
Yes No
Excess Pathogens and Chemicals from Manure, Bio-solids or Compost Applicationsin Ground Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Potential sources of pathogens or pharmaceuticals are not stored orapplied on the land; OR, Organic materials are applied, stored, and/orhandled to mitigate negative impacts to groundwater sources.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Water well(s) does not exist; OR, Any water well(s) is located at least100 feet from animal pens, feedlots, or similar AFO/CAFO OR runofffrom these areas is treated; OR, An impervious barrier around the wellprevents seepage into the groundwater.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 10 of 21
Petroleum, Heavy Metal and Other Pollutants Transported to Surface Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Activities do not present the potential for contamination by petroleum,heavy metals and other pollutants. If present, potential pollutants arestored and handled to avoid runoff to groundwater.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Fuel storage does not occur on this land management system; OR, Ifrequired, the producer has and is following a Spill Prevention, Control,and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan; OR, The fuel storage area and tankis located: - above the 100-year floodplain, - a minimum of 100 feetfrom any river, stream, ditch, pond, lake, sinkhole, wetland, or waterwell; AND, Within a stable place designed to provide secondarycontainment if the primary means were to fail.
Yes No
Petroleum, Heavy Metal and Other Pollutants Transported to Ground Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Activities do not present the potential for contamination by petroleum,heavy metals and other pollutants. If present, potential pollutants arestored and handled to avoid seepage to groundwater.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Fuel storage does not occur on this land management system; OR, Ifrequired, the producer has and is following a Spill Prevention, Control,and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan; OR, The fuel storage area and tankis located: - above the 100-year floodplain, - a minimum of 100 feetfrom any river, stream, ditch, pond, lake, sinkhole, wetland, or waterwell; AND, Within a stable place designed to provide secondarycontainment if the primary means were to fail.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 11 of 21
Excessive Sediment in Surface Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
There are no untreated sources of erosion and streams or shoreline arenot on or adjacent to site; OR, Upslope treatment and buffer practicesaddress concentrated flows to water bodies; AND, Heavy use areas arestable; AND, The SVAP2 - bank condition is >= 5.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Drainage and erosion control measures are implemented on roads,trails and landings to minimize detrimental effects of concentratedflow, erosion and sedimentation; AND, Stream crossings are restoredand stabilized.
Yes No
Water runoff from hard surfaces, such as building roofs, is controlledto the point that it does not cause erosion or concentrated streams ofwater.
Yes No
The land adjacent to a stream, river, or other waterbody on the side orsides you control does: - have diverse, natural plant cover typical tothat along streams in your area, - extend from the streambank/shoreline for a distance of 35 feet or (if applicable) the minimumState buffer-width requirement, whichever is greater; AND, Have fewplaces where concentrated runoff flows through.
Yes No
All temporary or permanent rills and gullies are stabilized; OR,Temporary or permanent rills and gullies do not exist.
Yes No
Established filter strips are at least 20 feet wide and maintained whenfilter strips are applicable. If filter strips are not applicable on this landmanagement system, set the test statement to NA.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 12 of 21
Elevated Water Temperature
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Water courses on or adjacent to the site are not designated by a StateAgency as a temperature impairment; OR, The SVAP2 - riparian areaquality element score is >= 5; AND, The SVAP2 - riparian areaquantity element score is >= 5; AND, The SVAP2 - canopy coverelement score is >= 6; OR, Existing conservation practices are in placeto address water temperature. If water courses are not present, set thisplanning criteria to NA.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Surface water temperatures do not limit use for fish, wildlife,invertebrates, or other intended purposes. If waterbodies are notpresent on this land management system, set the test statement to NA.
Yes No
More than 50% of the water surface is shaded on the length of thestream/river for this land management system. If waterbodies are notpresent on this land management system, set the test statement to NA.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 13 of 21
Air Quality Impacts
Emissions of Particulate Matter (PM) and PM Precursors
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Management activities do not contribute to agricultural sourceparticulate matter (PM) or PM precursor emissions; AND,documented episodes or complaints of emissions of PM (dust, smoke,exhaust, etc.), or chemical drift have not occurred. PM producingactivity examples are: Prescribed Burn is conducted, Travel waysunpaved or untreated with binding agents, Engines (combustionsource), Tillage, Pesticides are applied, Fertilization (manure/commercial), CAFO/manure management.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Dust is controlled on all non-vegetated, unpaved travel ways. Ifnon-vegetated or unpaved travel ways are not used or planned, set thistest statement to YES.
Yes No
Emissions of Ozone Precursors
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Operations that produce ozone precursor emissions are not present;OR, or are managed to reduce emissions. Ozone precursor producingactivities may include: Engines (combustion source), Pesticideapplication, Burning, CAFO /manure management, or fertilization(manure/commercial).
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Energy-efficient vehicles, equipment, and other actions are used tolessen discharges of NOx. Other actions may include: regularlyservicing and properly maintaining combustion equipment, using theminimum level of equipment needed to accomplish the activity, andminimizing number of trips into the area.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 14 of 21
Emission of Greenhouse Gases (GHGs)
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
If AFO/CAFO is present the National Air Quality Site AssessmentTool (NAQSAT) indicates "NA" or at least 50% green for thefollowing gasses: Methane (CH4) and Nitrous Oxide (N2O); for allapplicable management categories. If AFO/CAFO is not present,renewable energy sources are utilized.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Renewable energy sources are used. Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 15 of 21
Objectionable Odors
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
The score bars in the NAQSAT report are at least 50% green for all ofthese sectors (or appropriate documentation is provided to indicatewhy an applicable score bar does not need to be at least 50% green):Mortalities, Manure Storage, Feed and Water, Land Application, andAnimals and Housing data categories under Odor; Manure Storage,Feed and Water, and Animals and Housing data categories underVolatile organic compounds; Manure Storage and Feed and Waterdata categories under Hydrogen sulfide; and, Manure Storage, Feedand Water, Land Application, Animals and Housing, and Collectionand Transfer data categories under Ammonia.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Manure from AFO/CAFO is managed to reduce objectionable odors;AND, documented episodes or complaints of odor nuisance have notoccurred. If AFO/CAFO does not exist on this land managementsystem, set this test statement to NA.
Yes No
Composting is managed to reduce objectionable odors; AND,documented episodes or complaints of odor nuisance have notoccurred. If composting does not occur, set this test statement to NA.
Yes No
AFO/CAFO does not exist on the land management system; AND,documented episodes or complaints of odor nuisance have notoccurred. If AFO/CAFO exists, set this test statement to NA.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 16 of 21
Degraded Plant Condition
Undesirable Plant Productivity and Health
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Plants are adapted to the site, meet production goals, and do notnegatively impact other resources; AND, Plant damage from winderosion is below crop damage tolerance levels.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Plant yield, vigor, and quality are as expected. Yes No
Inadequate Structure and Composition
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Plant communities contain adequate diversity, composition andstructure to support desired ecological functions for the ecological site.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The current plants provide the desired habitat structure andcomposition. State identified invasive plants and noxious weeds arecontrolled.
Yes No
Trees and shrubs are pruned to improve plant structure andcomposition.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 17 of 21
Excessive Plant Pest Pressure
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Plant pest damage to plants is below economic or environmentalthresholds; AND, plant pests, including noxious and invasive speciesare managed.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Invasive and noxious weeds are controlled or are not present. Yes No
Wildfire Hazard, Excessive Biomass Accumulation
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Wildfire hazards is not a concern; OR, Fuel loads and fuel ladders aremanaged to provide defensible space.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Sites needing wildfire protection or using Prescribed Burning have apermanent or temporary strip of bare or vegetated land (i.e. FuelBreak) that retards fire.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 18 of 21
Fish and Wildlife - Inadequate Habitat
Inadequate Habitat - Food
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
The WHSI rating is >= 0.5; AND, (when surface stream present) TheSVAP2 - fish habitat complexity element score is >= 7; AND, TheSVAP2 - aquatic invertebrate habitat element score is >= 7; OR,Conservation practices and managements are in place that meet orexceed species or guild-specific habitat model thresholds; OR, Food isavailable in quality and extent to support habitat requirements for thespecies of interest.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Plants provide nectar and pollen sources for pollinators and beneficialinsects as well as providing adequate food for browsing animals.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 19 of 21
Inadequate Habitat - Cover/Shelter
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
The WHSI rating is >= 0.5; AND, (when surface stream present) theSVAP2 - barriers to movement element score is >= 7; AND, theSVAP2 - fish habitat complexity element score is >= 7; AND, theSVAP2 - aquatic invertebrate habitat element score is >= 7; ORconservation practices and management practices are in place thatmeet or exceed species or guild-specific habitat model thresholds; OR,habitat cover is of available quality and extent to support requirementsfor the species of interest.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Designated areas are planted as food and habitat forpollinators/beneficial insects. For example, planted to nectar andpollen producing plants and protected from disruption--chemical,biological, or mechanical.
Yes No
The forest/woodlot/shelterbelt is fully stocked with tree speciesadapted to the site; AND, Has spacing for good tree growth and airflow between and beneath: AND, Does not have excessive treemortality: AND, Has an understory made up of desirable species:AND, Is not inhibited by brush or other undesirable vegetation.
Yes No
Plant growth and cover is managed to develop and maintain habitat tohelp chosen wildlife species. (see State Wildlife Action Plan)
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 20 of 21
Inadequate Habitat - Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
The WHSI rating is >= 0.5;AND, (when surface stream present) TheSVAP2 - aquatic invertebrate habitat element score is >= 7; OR,Conservation practices and managements are in place that meet orexceed species or guild-specific habitat model thresholds; OR, Wateris available in quality and extent to support habitat requirements forthe species of interest.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Developments in the flood plain, stream water withdrawals, flowaugmentation, or water control structures may be present, but do notsignificantly alter the natural flow regime.
Yes No
Water for habitat is accessible and at the right depth, duration, andtime of year for chosen wildlife species (See State Wildlife ActionPlan)
Yes No
Inadequate Habitat - Habitat Continuity (Space)
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
The WHSI rating is >= 0.5; AND, (when surface stream present) TheSVAP2 - barriers to movement element score is >= 7; AND, TheSVAP2 - aquatic invertebrate habitat element score is >= 7; OR,Conservation practices and managements are in place that meet orexceed species or guild-specific habitat model thresholds; OR, Theconnectivity of habitat components are adequate to support stablepopulations of target species.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Connectivity between food resources and cover and shelter is providedfor the target wildlife species. (see State Wildlife Action Plan)
Yes No
In-stream structures (i.e. dam, diversion structure, bridge, culvert,low-water stream crossing, etc.) allow for the upstream anddownstream movement of fish and other aquatic animals throughoutmost of the year.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Farmstead
Page 21 of 21
Inefficient Energy Use
Equipment and Facilities
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
On-farm renewable energy and/or energy conserving practices havebeen implemented and energy savings can be documented byoperational adherence to an NRCS approved Energy Audit or the useof various energy saving calculators.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Pumps, motors, wells, etc. located on the land management system areimproved efficiency models.
Yes No
Energy loss from lighting, drying, refrigeration, cooling, heating, orbuilding insulation has been improved.
Yes No
Farming/Ranching Practices and Field Operations
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
On-farm renewable energy and/or energy conserving practices havebeen implemented and energy savings can be documented byoperational adherence to an NRCS approved Energy Audit or the useof various energy saving calculators.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Pumps, motors, wells, etc. located on the land management system areimproved efficiency models
Yes No
Energy loss from lighting, drying, refrigeration, cooling, heating, orbuilding insulation has been improved.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 1 of 24
Soil Erosion
Sheet and Rill Erosion
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Soil surface organic residue cover >80%; OR, Site is stable andwithout visible signs of erosion.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The forest O horizon is covered with leaves, needles, fine woodydebris, rocks, and/or herbaceous vegetation that protects the soil onmore than 80% of the area.
Yes No
Wind Erosion
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Soil surface organic residue cover >80%; OR, Site is stable andwithout visible signs of erosion.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The forest O horizon is covered with leaves, needles, fine woodydebris, rocks, and/or herbaceous vegetation that protects the soil onmore than 80% of the area.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 2 of 24
Classic Gully Erosion
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Classic gullies are not present; Or, Classic gully management isadequate to stop the progression of head cutting and widening andoffsite impacts are minimized by vegetation and/or structures.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Drainage and erosion control measures are implemented on roads,trails and landings to minimize detrimental effects of concentratedflow, erosion and sedimentation. Stream crossings are restored andstabilized.
Yes No
Classic Gullies are not present; Or, All classic gullies are stabilized;AND, All areas expected to have high erosion rates are stable.
Yes No
Streambank, Shoreline, Water Conveyance Channels
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
For shorelines and water conveyance channels; banks are stable orcommensurate with normal geomorphological processes; AND, Ifbank erosion is present, it is beyond the client's control orcommensurate with normal geomorphological processes; AND, Forstreambanks, SVAP2 bank condition element score > 5. If shorelinesor water conveyance channels are not present, set this planning criteriato NA.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Excluding all fundamentally unstable, natural geomorphicstreambanks and shorelines, all streambanks and shorelines on the landuse show few signs of erosion or bank failure; AND, Each is stableand protected with natural materials. If shorelines and waterconveyance channels do not exist on the land management system, setthis test statement to NA.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 3 of 24
Soil Quality Degradation
Organic Matter Depletion
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Organic matter within the soil is managed by means of proper forestmanagement. Determined and documented by use of on-siteevaluations and state specific forestland management practices.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Tree/shrub residue is left in place to provide for natural organic mattercycling within the forest.
Yes No
The forest O horizon is covered with leaves, needles, fine woodydebris, rocks, and/or herbaceous vegetation that protects the soil onmore than 80% of the area. The O and A horizons are not displaced.Woody residue is being added to the surface soil horizons throughbranch breakage and treefalls.
Yes No
Compaction
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Soil compaction is not a problem: AND, Activities do not cause soilcompaction problems AND can be documented with priorconservation planning or other on-site evaluation methods.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Trails and landings do not have visible drainage or erosion issues thatare a result of soil compaction.
Yes No
Soil compaction is limited to roads and landings. Tree root growth isnot impeded. No more than 15% of the forested area is devoted toroads, trails, and landings.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 4 of 24
Subsidence
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Histisols are managed so as to not exhibit signs of subsidence.Determined and documented with soil survey documentation or otheron-site evaluation methods.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The forest O horizon is covered with leaves, needles, fine woodydebris, rocks, and/or herbaceous vegetation that protects the soil onmore than 90% of the area. There is no artificial drainage operating onthe site. If histisols are not present on this land management system,set the test statement to NA.
Yes No
Concentration of Salts and other Chemicals
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Salinity/sodicity problems do not exist: OR, Conservation practicesand managements are in place to mitigate on-site effects.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
There are no areas of extensive bare ground, or largely unvegetatedareas, present in areas of high salts. If there are no areas of high saltson the land management system, set this test statement to YES.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 5 of 24
Excess Water
Runoff and Flooding and Ponding
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Runoff, flooding, and ponding is managed to minimize the impact onconservation measures and/or forest production.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Drainage and erosion control measures are implemented on roads,trails and landings to minimize detrimental effects of concentratedflow, erosion and sedimentation; AND, stream crossings are restoredand stabilized.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 6 of 24
Insufficient Water
Inefficient Use of Irrigation Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
The irrigation system components and management result in a FarmIrrigation Rating Index > 60; AND, Meets applicable State in-streamflow and lake and pond water levels requirements. If the landmanagement system is not irrigated, or equipment on this landmanagement system is not used to irrigate, set this planning criteria toNA.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
An irrigation water management (IWM) plan is followed that meetsthe crop's needs, while maximizing irrigation water efficiency. TheIWM plan schedules water application based on soil moisturemonitoring and/or evapotranspiration monitoring, measures andrecords the amount of water used to irrigate, and the irrigationsystem's distribution uniformity has been evaluated and necessarychanges were made. If the land management system is not irrigated, orequipment on this land management system is not used to irrigate, setthis test statement to NA.
Yes No
Inefficient Moisture Management
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Moisture management is not a problem and activities do not causeinefficient moisture management problems. Soil loss is less than orequal to T.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Management choices include actions to limit moisture loss. Forexample, maintaining shade, retaining the forest soil O horizon, andmaintaining correct stocking levels.
Yes No
Stocking levels are monitored and maintained to maximize foresthealth and production.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 7 of 24
Water Quality Degradation
Pesticides in Surface Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Pesticides are stored, handled, disposed and applied to prevent runoff,spills, leaks and leaching; AND, Conservation practices andtechniques are in place to minimize ground water impacts.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Pesticides are not applied or stored on this land management system;Or,' Pesticides are applied using a site-specific mixture of prevention,avoidance, monitoring, and suppression (PAMS) strategies.Environmental risk screening tool are used (such as WIN-PST orsimilar LGU approved tool); AND, application rates and timing arecompliant with the label.
Yes No
Pesticides in Ground Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Pesticides are stored, handled, disposed and applied to prevent runoff,spills, leaks and leaching; AND, Conservation practices andtechniques are in place to minimize ground water impacts.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Pesticides are not applied or stored on this land management system;OR, Pesticides are applied using a site-specific mixture of prevention,avoidance, monitoring, and suppression (PAMS) strategies; AND,Environmental risk screening tool are used (such as WIN-PST orsimilar LGU approved tool); AND, Application rates and timing arecompliant with the label.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 8 of 24
Nutrients in Surface Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Organic or inorganic nutrients are not applied and the PLU is notgrazed; OR, If nutrients are applied, they are based on a soil test, tissuetests or nutrient budget and livestock access to streams is controlled.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The land adjacent to a stream, river, or other waterbody on the side orsides you control: - has diverse, natural plant cover typical to thatalong other streams within the drainage basin; - extend from thestream bank/shoreline for a distance of 35 feet; OR, (if applicable) Theminimum State buffer-width requirement, whichever is greater; AND,Have few places where concentrated runoff flows through.
Yes No
Drainage and erosion control measures are implemented on roads,trails and landings to minimize detrimental effects of concentratedflow, erosion and sedimentation; AND, Stream crossings are restoredand stabilized.
Yes No
Livestock access to streams is limited to short periods of time andsmall areas.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 9 of 24
Nutrients in Ground Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Organic or inorganic nutrients are not applied and PLU is not grazed;OR, Nutrient and amendment applications are based on soil or tissuetests and nutrient budgets for realistic yields and conservationpractices: AND, Management activities are in place to minimizeground water impacts.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Grazing management in close proximity to sinkholes does not degradegroundwater. If sinkholes are not in close proximity to this landmanagement system, set the test statement to YES.
Yes No
Nutrients are not applied on this land management system; OR, ifnutrients are applied, a nutrient budget is used to determine allapplication rates, including: - Realistic yield goals, - Nutrient uptakerequirements, and - Available nutrient accounting for each of thefollowing: (a) N, P, K from representative soil tests (less than or equalto 3yrs), (b) Soil organic matter mineralization, (c) Legumes inrotation, (d) Previous applications of manure and other organic basedmaterials, (e) Planned post-harvest residual soil test levels, (f)Available nutrient analysis for each nutrient source, and (g) Availablenutrient uptake efficiencies from planned application rate, source,method, timing and placement. All state specific application setbacksare maintained for all nutrient applications.
Yes No
Excess Pathogens and Chemicals from Manure, Bio-solids or Compost Applicationsin Surface Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Potential sources of pathogens or pharmaceuticals are not applied onthe land; OR, Organic materials are applied, stored, and/or handled tomitigate negative impacts to surface water sources.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Livestock access to stream is controlled; OR, Livestock are limited tosmall watering or crossing areas.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 10 of 24
Petroleum, Heavy Metal and Other Pollutants Transported to Surface Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Activities do not present the potential for contamination by petroleum,heavy metals and other pollutants. If present, potential pollutants arestored and handled to avoid runoff to groundwater.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Fuel storage does not occur on this land management system; OR, Ifrequired, the producer has and is following a Spill Prevention, Control,and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan; OR, The fuel storage area and tankis located: - above the 100-year floodplain, - a minimum of 100 feetfrom any river, stream, ditch, pond, lake, sinkhole, wetland, or waterwell; AND, Within a stable place designed to provide secondarycontainment if the primary means were to fail.
Yes No
Petroleum, Heavy Metal and Other Pollutants Transported to Ground Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Activities do not present the potential for contamination by petroleum,heavy metals and other pollutants. If present, potential pollutants arestored and handled to avoid seepage to groundwater.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Fuel storage does not occur on this land management system; OR, Ifrequired, the producer has and is following a Spill Prevention, Control,and Countermeasure (SPCC) Plan; OR, The fuel storage area and tankis located: - above the 100-year floodplain, - a minimum of 100 feetfrom any river, stream, ditch, pond, lake, sinkhole, wetland, or waterwell; AND, Within a stable place designed to provide secondarycontainment if the primary means were to fail.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 11 of 24
Excessive Sediment in Surface Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
There are no untreated sources of erosion and streams or shoreline arenot on or adjacent to site; OR, Upslope treatment and buffer practicesaddress concentrated flows to water bodies; AND, Heavy use areas arestable; AND, The SVAP2 - bank condition is >= 5.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The land adjacent to a stream, river, or other waterbody on the side orsides you control does: - have diverse, natural plant cover typical tothat along streams in your area, - extend from the streambank/shoreline for a distance of 35 feet or (if applicable) the minimumState buffer-width requirement, whichever is greater; AND, Have fewplaces where concentrated runoff flows through.
Yes No
Drainage and erosion control measures are implemented on roads,trails and landings to minimize detrimental effects of concentratedflow, erosion and sedimentation; AND, Stream crossings are restoredand stabilized.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 12 of 24
Elevated Water Temperature
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Water courses on or adjacent to the site are not designated by a StateAgency as a temperature impairment; OR, The SVAP2 - riparian areaquality element score is >= 5; AND, The SVAP2 - riparian areaquantity element score is >= 5; AND, The SVAP2 - canopy coverelement score is >= 6; OR, Existing conservation practices are in placeto address water temperature. If water courses are not present, set thisplanning criteria to NA.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
More than 50% of the water surface is shaded on the length of thestream/river for this land management system. If waterbodies are notpresent on this land management system, set the test statement to NA.
Yes No
Surface water temperatures do not limit use for fish, wildlife,invertebrates, or other intended purposes. If waterbodies are notpresent on this land management system, set the test statement to NA.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 13 of 24
Air Quality Impacts
Emissions of Particulate Matter (PM) and PM Precursors
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Management activities do not contribute to agricultural sourceparticulate matter (PM) or PM precursor emissions; AND,documented episodes or complaints of emissions of PM (dust, smoke,exhaust, etc.), or chemical drift have not occurred. PM producingactivity examples are: Prescribed Burn is conducted, Travel waysunpaved or untreated with binding agents, Engines (combustionsource), Tillage, Pesticides are applied, Fertilization (manure/commercial), CAFO/manure management.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Field operations and activities are managed to minimize particulateemissions on the farm (i.e. multi-operation field tools, precisionguidance systems, Prescribed Burn plans are implemented, andtreatment/management of all non-vegetated, unpaved travel ways.)
Yes No
Dust is controlled on all non-vegetated, unpaved travel ways. Ifnon-vegetated or unpaved travel ways are not used or planned, set thistest statement to YES.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 14 of 24
Emissions of Ozone Precursors
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Operations that produce ozone precursor emissions are not present;OR, or are managed to reduce emissions. Ozone precursor producingactivities may include: Engines (combustion source), Pesticideapplication, Burning, CAFO /manure management, or fertilization(manure/commercial).
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Pesticides are not applied; OR, an IPM plan is followed which reducesozone precursors. IPM includes applications of pesticides, includingfumigants, be applied in a way that emissions of ozone precursors arereduced; Application methods may include: spot spraying, pest/targetsensing application equipment, alternative pesticide formulations, orlow emission fumigation methods.
Yes No
Farm or forest harvest equipment is serviced at regular intervals toreduce emissions of ozone precursors
Yes No
Energy-efficient vehicles, equipment, and other actions are used tolessen discharges of NOx. Other actions may include: regularlyservicing and properly maintaining combustion equipment, using theminimum level of equipment needed to accomplish the activity, andminimizing number of trips into the area.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 15 of 24
Emission of Greenhouse Gases (GHGs)
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Activities that produce GHGs emissions are not present: OR, activitiesthat produce GHGs emissions are managed to reduce those emissions;AND, Carbon sequestration is enhanced through reduced tillagemethods or other practices. GHG producing activities that should beconsidered include: Fertilization (manure/commercial), Tillagemethods, grazing management, and forestry practices; AND GHGs arenot regulated in this planning area.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The forest is managed to promote carbon sequestration by selectingspecies with high growth rates or species with long lifespans that arecapable of reaching a large size.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 16 of 24
Degraded Plant Condition
Undesirable Plant Productivity and Health
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Forest species are adapted to site AND, Composition and stand densitymeet ecological site objectives and production goals.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The forest or woodlot is fully stocked with tree species adapted to thesite, has spacing for good tree growth and air flow between andbeneath, does not have excessive tree mortality, has an understorymade up of desirable species and is not inhibited by brush or otherundesirable vegetation. Monitoring for insects and disease iscompleted to prevent outbreaks that would be detrimental to foresthealth.
Yes No
Inadequate Structure and Composition
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Plant communities contain adequate diversity, composition andstructure to support desired ecological functions for the ecological site.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The current plants provide the desired habitat structure andcomposition. State identified invasive plants and noxious weeds arecontrolled.
Yes No
The forest or woodlot is fully stocked with tree species adapted to thesite, has spacing for good tree growth and air flow between andbeneath, does not have excessive tree mortality, has an understorymade up of desirable species and is not inhibited by brush or otherundesirable vegetation.
Yes No
Trees and shrubs are pruned to improve plant structure andcomposition.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 17 of 24
Excessive Plant Pest Pressure
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Plant pest damage to plants is below economic or environmentalthresholds; AND, plant pests, including noxious and invasive speciesare managed.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Noxious weeds, and plants that impact forest growth, are controlled orare not present.
Yes No
Trees are selected or planted that are tolerant of known damagingpests. Woody debris that fosters pest outbreaks is appropriately treatedto reduce risk.
Yes No
Wildfire Hazard, Excessive Biomass Accumulation
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Wildfire hazards is not a concern; OR, Fuel loads and fuel ladders aremanaged to provide defensible space.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The forest or woodlot is fully stocked with tree species adapted to thesite, has spacing for good tree growth and air flow between andbeneath, does not have excessive tree mortality, has an understorymade up of desirable species and is not inhibited by brush or otherundesirable vegetation. Monitoring for insects and disease iscompleted to prevent outbreaks that would be detrimental to foresthealth. Woody debris on the forest floor supports wildlife but does notpresent an elevated fire risk.
Yes No
Active management occurs to avoid excessive buildup of likelywildfire fuels.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 18 of 24
Fish and Wildlife - Inadequate Habitat
Inadequate Habitat - Food
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
The WHSI rating is >= 0.5; AND, (when surface stream present) TheSVAP2 - fish habitat complexity element score is >= 7; AND, TheSVAP2 - aquatic invertebrate habitat element score is >= 7; OR,Conservation practices and managements are in place that meet orexceed species or guild-specific habitat model thresholds; OR, Food isavailable in quality and extent to support habitat requirements for thespecies of interest.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Plant growth and cover is managed to develop and maintain habitat tobenefit target wildlife species.
Yes No
Trees and shrubs provide nectar and pollen sources for pollinators andbeneficial insects as well as providing adequate food for browsinganimals.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 19 of 24
Inadequate Habitat - Cover/Shelter
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
The WHSI rating is >= 0.5; AND, (when surface stream present) theSVAP2 - barriers to movement element score is >= 7; AND, theSVAP2 - fish habitat complexity element score is >= 7; AND, theSVAP2 - aquatic invertebrate habitat element score is >= 7; ORconservation practices and management practices are in place thatmeet or exceed species or guild-specific habitat model thresholds; OR,habitat cover is of available quality and extent to support requirementsfor the species of interest.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Timber is managed in uneven aged stands, and not clear-cut. Yes No
Plant growth and cover is managed to develop and maintain habitat tohelp chosen wildlife species. (see State Wildlife Action Plan)
Yes No
The stream(s) have: - a natural, unaltered configuration, with minimalchannel straightening, dredging, or bank alteration by armoring withrip-rap or other non-natural materials, - stable banks with limitederosion or bank failure; AND, human uses and/or grazing levels thatdo not negatively impact bank condition. If streams are not present onthe land management system, set the test statement to NA.
Yes No
Livestock access to stream(s) is controlled; OR, livestock access islimited to small watering or crossing areas
Yes No
Designated areas are planted as food and habitat forpollinators/beneficial insects. For example, planted to nectar andpollen producing plants and protected from disruption--chemical,biological, or mechanical.
Yes No
The pond/lake, which supports a natural or planted fish population, ismanaged: -to exclude livestock, -to control nuisance species andundesirable aquatic vegetation controlled, -to complies with state andlocal regulations when stocking the pond, AND -use of a buffer zoneof diverse, natural plant cover at least 35 feet wide.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 20 of 24
Inadequate Habitat - Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
The WHSI rating is >= 0.5;AND, (when surface stream present) TheSVAP2 - aquatic invertebrate habitat element score is >= 7; OR,Conservation practices and managements are in place that meet orexceed species or guild-specific habitat model thresholds; OR, Wateris available in quality and extent to support habitat requirements forthe species of interest.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Water for habitat is accessible and at the right depth, duration, andtime of year for chosen wildlife species (See State Wildlife ActionPlan)
Yes No
Developments in the flood plain, stream water withdrawals, flowaugmentation, or water control structures may be present, but do notsignificantly alter the natural flow regime.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 21 of 24
Inadequate Habitat - Habitat Continuity (Space)
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
The WHSI rating is >= 0.5; AND, (when surface stream present) TheSVAP2 - barriers to movement element score is >= 7; AND, TheSVAP2 - aquatic invertebrate habitat element score is >= 7; OR,Conservation practices and managements are in place that meet orexceed species or guild-specific habitat model thresholds; OR, Theconnectivity of habitat components are adequate to support stablepopulations of target species.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Connectivity between food resources and cover and shelter is providedfor the target wildlife species. (see State Wildlife Action Plan)
Yes No
The land adjacent to a stream, river, or other waterbody on the side orsides you control does: - have diverse, natural plant cover typical tothat along streams in your area; AND, Extend from the stream bank orshoreline for a distance of 35 feet; OR, (if applicable) The minimumState buffer-width requirement, whichever is greater.
Yes No
Designated areas are planted as habitat for pollinators and beneficialinsects. Non-cropped area protected from disruption during nestingand foraging periods--chemical, biological, or mechanical.
Yes No
In-stream structures (i.e. dam, diversion structure, bridge, culvert,low-water stream crossing, etc.) allow for the upstream anddownstream movement of fish and other aquatic animals throughoutmost of the year.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 22 of 24
Livestock Production Limitation
Inadequate Feed and Forage
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Livestock forage, roughage, and supplemental nutritional requirementsare met.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
An existing Prescribed Grazing plan is on schedule. Animal stockinglevels, minimum forage heights are maintained and rotation periodsare designed to avoid harm to sensitive plants. If the forest is notgrazed, set this test statement to NA.
Yes No
Inadequate Shelter
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Artificial or natural shelters meet animal health needs. Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Adequate shelter is provided to meet the needs of the livestockthroughout the period the land management system (LMS) is utilizedby livestock. If livestock do not use this LMS, set the test statement toNA.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 23 of 24
Inadequate Water
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
Water of acceptable quality and quantity is adequately distributed tomeet animal needs.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
The livestock have enough drinking water of good quality. If livestockdo not use this land management system, set the test statement to NA.
Yes No
RCPP-CSP-2019-1_AK - AK Non Industrial Private Forestland_Forest
Page 24 of 24
Inefficient Energy Use
Equipment and Facilities
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
On-site renewable energy and/or energy conserving implements havebeen implemented to improve energy efficiency for field operations.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Energy conserving implements are used for all or some fieldoperations.
Yes No
Farming/Ranching Practices and Field Operations
Planning Criteria Planning Criteria Met
On-farm renewable energy and/or energy conserving implements arebeing used to improve energy efficiency for forestland operations.Forestland operations are planned with the intent to reduce trips intothe forestland.
Yes No
Evaluation Tests Evaluation Test Met
Energy-efficient actions are used in forest management activities. Forexample, limiting the number of trips into the forest, or leaving woodyresidue in place if it is not a fire or pest hazard.
Yes No