Transcript
Page 1: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

www.fugro.com

Geohazard Assessment for Deepwater Development –A Multi-Disciplinary, Integrated Approach

Stephen Wardlaw20 October 2011

Page 2: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

OBJECTIVES

1. Review various geohazards that may impact deepwater development

2. Identify geoscience disciplines that can contribute to geohazard assessment

3. Illustrate idealized sequence of geohazard assessment tasks within project development process

Stephen Wardlaw

Geohazard Assessment for Deepwater DevelopmentA Multi-Disciplinary, Integrated Approach

2

Page 3: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Deepwater Environment – East Coast India

3

Regional Bathymetry Regional Dip Map

After Bastia et al. (2011)

Page 4: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Deepwater Geohazards – East Coast India

4

Submarine canyons and channels

Sediment Waves

After Bastia et al. (2011)Gas Hydrates (BSR)

Page 5: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Deepwater Geohazards – East Coast India

5

Seismic Hazard

Monsoon Winds - July

Ocean Currents

Page 6: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Deepwater Conditions – East Coast India

6

Typical Deepwater Hazards

Page 7: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Deepwater Geohazard Register

7

Geologic Feature Potential Hazard/ConstraintSteep Slopes Unstable base, slope failuresActive Channels/Canyons Turbidity Flows, Debris FlowsRough seafloor topography Pipeline spans, unsuitable baseMobile sediments (sand waves)

Unstable base

Seafloor Currents Erosion, ScourGas Hydrates Dissociation leading to loss of soil strength,

foundation strain Hydrocarbon venting Unstable sediments, authigenic carbonate buildupEarthquakes Soil liquefaction, slope failure triggerActive faults Local shear, gas conduitStorms (wind/waves) Impact to risers/topsides, slope failure trigger

Page 8: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Geohazard Assessment Sequence

8

Desktop study

Black hole…Geophysics

CPT

BoreholesTestingIntegrated Interpretation

Engineering Design

Page 9: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Geohazard Assessment Sequence

9

Page 10: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Multi-Disciplinary Integration

10

Ground Model

Metocean

GIS Database

Analogous Sites/Previous Experience

Engineering Analysis

Geotechnical Data

Geophysical Data

Public Domain

Page 11: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Geohazard Assessment SequenceRegional Desktop Studies

11

Geophysical /Public Domain Data

Regional Geohazard Inventory

Regional Favorability Chart

Page 12: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Geohazard Assessment SequenceRegional Desktop Studies

12

Metocean Desktop Study

Probabilistic Seismic Hazard Analysis (PSHA)

Page 13: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Geohazard Assessment SequenceGeophysical Surveys

13

Bathymetry

AUV Surveys

Sub-bottom Profiler (SBP)

Side-scan Sonar (SSS)

Page 14: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Geohazard Assessment SequenceGeotechnical Sampling/Testing

14

Drillship

Jumbo Piston Coring

Borings

In-situ Testing (CPT)

Box Cores

Laboratory Testing

Page 15: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Geohazard Assessment SequenceIntegrated Interpretation

15

Page 16: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Geohazard Assessment SequenceIntegrated Interpretation

16

Page 17: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Geohazard Assessment SequenceSpecialist Analysis

17

1

2

3

6

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

100

0

110

120

130

140

Oxygen IsotopeStage

M4 (~23.8 ka)

M3 (~22.5 ka)

M2 (~19.8 ka)

M1 (~14.9 ka)

M6 (~75 ka)

M5 (<24, > 75 ka)

1

2

3

6

4

5

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

9

100

0

110

120

130

140

125+5 ka

75+5 ka

59+4 ka

28+4 ka

13.7 ka

Ages of Low-to-High Sea Level

Transitions

Carbon-14 Sample Locations from a

Stratigraphic Reference Core

Fault History Analysis

Page 18: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Geohazard Assessment SequenceRisk Assessment

18

Risk Analysis Matrix

Mudflow Susceptibility MapImpact Assessment

Page 19: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Geohazard Assessment SequenceEngineering Design (Pipeline Modeling)

19

Soil-Pipe Interaction

Page 20: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Geohazard Assessment SequenceEngineering Design (Suction Anchors)

20

Page 21: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Geohazard Assessment Sequence

21

Page 22: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

Stephen Wardlaw

Geohazard Assessment Sequence

22

Page 23: Session4 StephanWardlaw Fugro [Compatibility Mode]

CONCLUSIONS

1. Significant potential geohazards affecting deepwater development offshore India are widespread

2. Start process early in the project life cycle to have maximum cost-effective impact on project

3. Follow recommended sequence of tasks

4. Multi-disciplinary, integrated approach is key to success

Stephen Wardlaw

Geohazard Assessment for Deepwater DevelopmentA Multi-Disciplinary, Integrated Approach

23