Transcript
Page 1: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

Marija Tresoglavic Acting Commission Secretary [email protected] bcuc.com

Suite 410, 900 Howe Street Vancouver, BC Canada V6Z 2N3 P: 604.660.4700 TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102

AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1

June 1, 2020 Sent via email/eFile

FEI - 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM

EXHIBIT A-2

To: FortisBC Inc. Licensed Gas Marketers British Columbia Old Age Pensioners’ Organization Re: FortisBC Energy Inc. – 2019 Customer Choice Annual General Meeting – Request for Submissions By Order A-10-12, the British Columbia Utilities Commission (BCUC) established the following regulatory process for the 2019 Customer Choice Program Annual General Meeting (AGM):

• FortisBC Energy Inc. (FEI) releases program statistics annually;

• BCUC staff canvass stakeholders about program issues to be addressed, if any, at the AGM; and

• the BCUC determines whether an AGM proceeding is warranted for the year.

On February 27, 2020, FEI submitted program statistics for the 2019 calendar year, in accordance with Order A-10-12. The BCUC is seeking comments on whether an AGM process is warranted this year, and if so, the proposed issues for discussion.

Enclosed, please find BCUC’s standard dispute and complaint statistics for the 2019 calendar year for your review. FortisBC Energy Inc.’s Customer Choice program statistics for the 2019 calendar year have been filed as Exhibit B-1 at the following link: B-1-FEI-2019-AGM-CustomerChoiceProgramStatistics.

Please file your submissions on whether an AGM process is warranted this year, and if so, proposed issues for discussion, to all above noted parties by June 12, 2020. As part of your submission, if an AGM process is warranted, please comment on whether an electronic meeting would be feasible.

Sincerely, Original Signed By: Marija Tresoglavic Acting Commission Secretary RQ/mp Enclosure

Page 2: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

O V E R V I E W O F S TA N D A R D D I S P U T E S & C O M P L A I N T S F I L E D I N 2 0 1 9

CUSTOMER CHOICE:

May 29, 2020

Page 3: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

STANDARD DISPUTES AND COMPLAINTS

• The BCUC has two processes for consumers who are concerned about a

contract with or the marketing activities of a Gas Marketer: the Dispute

Process and the Complaint Process:

• Generally, customers who have entered into an agreement with a

Gas Marketer follow the dispute process and consumers who have

not entered into an agreement with a Gas Marketer, but have a

concern about a Gas Marketer, follow the complaint process.

• The following slides present dispute and complaint data for the 2019

calendar year.

2

Page 4: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

0

2

4

6

8

10

12

14

16

Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec

STANDARD DISPUTES AND OUTCOMES

3

Gross enrollments: 10,753

FEI Figure 3-2(total customers

signing contracts in 2019)

Active enrollments: 28,215

FEI Table 8-5(total customers enrolled with a gas

marketer as of December 31, 2019)

Total disputes filed: 106

Page 5: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

DISPUTE OUTCOMES: OVERALL

26%(27 disputes)

74%(78 Disputes)

Dispute Outcome

Contract upheld (ruling for marketer)

Contract cancelled (ruling for customer)

Note: BCUC dispute statistics differ from FortisBC dispute

statistics for two reasons:

1. BCUC reports on dispute outcomes by dispute filed,

whereas FortisBC reports on dispute outcomes by month

the ruling was filed (i.e. the ruling is not necessarily tied to a

dispute filed in that month); and,

2. BCUC includes Non-GEM dispute data (disputes filed

directly with the Commission, not through FortisBC).

FortisBC does not have access to this data and thus does

not include it in their reporting.

4

Page 6: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

DISPUTE OUTCOMES: A CLOSER LOOK

Contract Cancelled

(78 disputes)

82%(64 Disputes)

18% (14 Disputes)

Resolved between marketer and customer- contract cancelled

Adjudicated in favour of customer

Contract Upheld

(27 disputes)

Resolved between marketer and customer -contract upheld

Adjudicated in favour of marketer

11%(3 Disputes)

89%(24 Disputes)

5

Page 7: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

REASON FOR DISPUTE

56%

21%

10%

6%

5% 3%

Reason for Dispute

Marketing

Invalid Contract

Cancellation

Exit Fees

Alleged Forgery

Renewal

6

Total – 78 Disputes

Page 8: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

MOST COMMON REASONS FOR

DISPUTE: 2014-2019

Reasons

for

Dispute

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Most

common

Marketing Marketing Marketing Marketing Marketing

2nd most

common

Invalid contract Invalid

contract

Invalid contract Invalid contract Invalid contract

3rd most

common

Alleged forgery Cancellation Cancellation Cancellation Cancellation

7

Page 9: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

MOST COMMON REASON FOR DISPUTE

• MARKETING (ALLEGED MISREPRESENTATION) – 62 DISPUTES

82% (51 Disputes)

15%(9 Disputes)

3%(2 Disputes)

Misrepresentation ofcontract rate

Misrepresentation ofmarketer's identity

Misrepresentation ofcontract term

Dispute filed on the basis of

(sub-reason):

Note: Percentages are calculated based on sub-

reason, e.g. 82% of marketing disputes are filed

due to alleged misrepresentation of the contract

rate.

8

Page 10: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

MARKETING DISPUTES: OUTCOMES

29%(18 Contracts)

71%(44 Contracts)

Contract upheld

Contract cancelled

Detailed Outcome

3%

26%

58%

13%

Upheld - Resolved between marketer and customer

Upheld - Adjudicated in favour of marketer

Cancelled - Resolved between marketer and customer

Cancelled - Adjudicated in favour of customer

9

High-level Outcome

Page 11: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

2ND MOST COMMON DISPUTE REASON

• INVALID CONTRACT – 18 DISPUTES

78%

5%

6%

11%

Disputes

Unauthorized signatureBusiness SoldGas Marketer SoldSpouse signed

Dispute filed on the basis of

(sub-reason):

10

Page 12: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

INVALID CONTRACT DISPUTES:

OUTCOMES

11%(2 Contracts)

89%(16 Contracts)

Contract upheld

Contract cancelled

Detailed Outcome

11%

56%

33%

Upheld - Adjudicated in favour of marketer

Cancelled - Resolved between marketer and customer

Cancelled - Adjudicated in favour of customer

11

High-level Outcome

Page 13: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

STANDARD DISPUTES BY RATE CLASS:

2015-2019

18% 13% 25% 27% 36%

82% 87%75% 73%

64%

0%

20%

40%

60%

80%

100%

2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Residential

Commercial

The graph below illustrates the proportion of total standard disputes filed

between 2015 and 2019 by residential vs. commercial customers:

12

Page 14: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

DISPUTES BY YEAR CONTRACT SIGNED

2

7 6 3

3742

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

40

45

2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019

Year disputed contract signed

Nu

mb

er

of

dis

pu

tes f

iled

in

2019

13

Page 15: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

COMPLAINTS FILED IN 2019:

PRIMARY REASON FOR CANCELLATION

14

76%

24%

Reason for complaint

Misrepresentation

Salesperson Demeanor

Gross enrollments: 10,753

FEI Figure 3-2(total customers

signing contracts in 2019)

Active enrollments: 28,215

FEI Table 8-5(total customers enrolled with a gas

marketer as of December 31, 2019)

Total complaints filed:

37

Page 16: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

TOP COMPLAINTS: OUTCOMES

15

Complaint Reason Complaint Outcome

Misrepresentation

(28 complaints)

▪ Provided information; customer had no further

questions/concerns (16)

▪ Marketer took corrective action with agent (6)

▪ Marketer cancelled contract (4)

▪ Cases still open (2)

Salesperson demeanor

(9 complaints)

▪ Provided information; customer had no further

questions/concerns (5)

▪ Marketer took corrective action with agent (4)

Page 17: Sent via email/eFile FEI 2019 CUSTOMER CHOICE AGM EXHIBIT A-2 · 2020. 6. 1. · TF: 1.800.663.1385 F: 604.660.1102 AGM Submissions Request 1 of 1 June 1, 2020 ... •The following

END


Recommended