T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Chapters – 5 & 6
Chapter -5RESPONSE SPECTRUM METHOD OF ANALYSIS
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
IntroductionResponse spectrum method is favoured by earthquake engineering community because of:
It provides a technique for performing an equivalent static lateral load analysis.
It allows a clear understanding of the contributions of different modes of vibration.
It offers a simplified method for finding the design forces for structural members for earthquake. It is also useful for approximate evaluation of seismic reliability of structures.
1/1
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd… The concept of equivalent lateral forces for earth- quake is a unique concept because it converts a dynamic analysis partly to dynamic & partly to static analysis for finding maximum stresses.
For seismic design, these maximum stresses are of interest, not the time history of stress.
Equivalent lateral force for an earthquake is defined as a set of lateral force which will produce the same peak response as that obtained by dynamic analysis of structures .
The equivalence is restricted to a single mode of vibration.
1/2
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…
A modal analysis of the structure is carried out to obtain mode shapes, frequencies & modal participation factors.
Using the acceleration response spectrum, an equivalent static load is derived which will provide the same maximum response as that obtained in each mode of vibration.
Maximum modal responses are combined to find total maximum response of the structure.
1/3
The response spectrum method of analysis is developed using the following steps.
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
The first step is the dynamic analysis while , the second step is a static analysis.
The first two steps do not have approximations, while the third step has some approximations.
As a result, response spectrum analysis is called an approximate analysis; but applications show that it provides mostly a good estimate of peak responses.
Method is developed for single point, single component excitation for classically damped linear systems. However, with additional approximations it has been extended for multi point-multi component excitations & for non- classically damped systems.
Contd…1/4
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Equation of motion for MDOF system under single point excitation
(5.1)
Using modal transformation, uncoupled sets of equations take the form
is the mode shape; ωi is the natural frequency is the more participation factor; is the modal damping ratio.
Development of the method
gx Mx Cx Kx MI
22 ; 1 (5.2)i i i i i i i gz z z x i m Ti
i Ti i
MI
M
1/5
iλi ξi
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Response of the system in the ith mode is
(5.3)
Elastic force on the system in the ith mode (5.4)
As the undamped mode shape satisfies (5.5)
Eq 5.4 can be written as (5.6)
The maximum elastic force developed in the ith mode
(5.7)
Contd…
i i ix =φ z
si i i if =Kx =Kφ z
i2
i i iKφ =ω Mφ
2si i i if =ω Mφ z
2simax i i imaxf =Mφ ω z
1/6
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Referring to the development of displacement response spectrum
(5.8)
Using , Eqn 5.7 may be written as (5.9)
Eq 5.4 can be written as (5.10) is the equivalent static load for the ith mode of vibration. is the static load which produces structural displacements same as the maximum modal displacement.
Contd…
max ,ii i d i iz S
max ii aS is i i ef M P
1 1max max
ii s i ex K f K P
2a dS S
Pe i
1/7
Pe i
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Since both response spectrum & mode shape properties are required in obtaining , it is known as modal response spectrum analysis.
It is evident from above that both the dynamic & static analyses are involved in the method of analysis as mentioned before.
As the contributions of responses from different modes constitute the total response, the total maximum response is obtained by combining modal quantities.
This combination is done in an approximate manner since actual dynamic analysis is now replaced by partly dynamic & partly static analysis.
Contd…
Pe i
1/8
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Three different types of modal combination rules are popular
ABSSUM
SRSS
CQC
Contd…Modal combination rules
ABSSUM stands for absolute sum of maximum values of responses; If is the response quantity of interest
x
max1
m
ii
x x
(5.11)
is the absolute maximum value of response in the ith mode.
maxix
2/1
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
The combination rule gives an upper bound to the computed values of the total response for two
reasons: It assumes that modal peak responses occur at the same time. It ignores the algebraic sign of the response.
Actual time history analysis shows modal peaks occur at different times as shown in Fig. 5.1;further time history of the displacement has peak value at some other time.
Thus, the combination provides a conservative estimate of response.
Contd…2/2
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
0 5 10 15 20 25 30-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
Top
floor
dis
pla
cem
en
t (m
)
t=6.15
0 5 10 15 20 25 30-0.4
-0.2
0
0.2
0.4
Time (sec)
Fir
st g
ener
aliz
ed d
isp
lace
men
t (m
)
t=6.1
(a) Top storey displacement
(b) First generalized displacement
2/3
Fig 5.1
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…
0 5 10 15 20 25 30-0.06
-0.04
-0.02
0
0.02
0.04
0.06
Time (sec)
Secon
d g
en
era
lize
d d
isp
lacem
en
t (m
)
t=2.5
(c) Second generalized displacement
Fig 5.1 (contd.)
2/3
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
SRSS combination rule denotes square root of sum of squares of modal responses
For structures with well separated frequencies, it provides a good estimate of total peak response.
When frequencies are not well separated, some errors are introduced due to the degree of correlation of modal responses which is ignored.
The CQC rule called complete quadratic combination rule takes care of this correlation.
Contd…
2max
1
(5.12)m
ii
x x
2/4
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
It is used for structures having closely spaced frequencies:
Second term is valid for & includes the effect of degree of correlation.
Due to the second term, the peak response may be estimated less than that of SRSS.
Various expressions for are available; here only two are given :
Contd…
2
1 1 1
(5.13)m m m
i ij i ji i j
x x x x
i j
2/5
i j
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
(Rosenblueth & Elordy) (5.14)
(Der Kiureghian) (5.15)
Both SRSS & CQC rules for combining peak modal responses are best derived by assuming
earthquake as a stochastic process.
If the ground motion is assumed as a stationary random process, then generalized coordinate in each mode is also a random process & there should exist a cross correlation between generalized coordinates.
Contd…
22
2 2
1
1 4
ij
ij
ij ij
32 2
2 22
8 1
1 4 1
ij ij
ij
ij ij ij
2/6
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Because of this, exists between two modal peak responses.
Both CQC & SRSS rules provide good estimates of peak response for wide band earthquakes with duration much greater than the period of structure. Because of the underlying principle of random vibration in deriving the combination rules, the peak response would be better termed as mean peak response.
Fig 5.2 shows the variation of with frquency ratio. rapidly decreases as frequency ratio increases.
Contd… 2/7
i j
i j
i j
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Fig 5.2
Contd… 2/8
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
As both response spectrum & PSDF represent frequency contents of ground motion, a relationship
exists between the two.
This relationship is investigated for the smoothed curves of the two.
Here a relationship proposed by Kiureghian is presented
Contd…
0
2.8( ) 2 ln (5.16 b)
2p
2/9
22
0
,2 4(5.16 a)
gff
x
DS
p
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…
0 10 20 30 40 50 600
0.01
0.02
0.03
0.04
0.05
Frequency (rad/sec)
PS
DF
of
acce
lera
tio
n
(m
2 sec-3 /r
ad)
Unsmoothed PSDF from Eqn 5.16aRaw PSDF from fourier spectrum
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 1000
0.005
0.01
0.015
0.02
0.025
Frequency (rad/sec)
PS
DF
s of
acc
eler
atio
n (
m2 se
c-3 /rad
)
Eqn.5.16aFourier spectrum of El Centro
Unsmoothed
5 Point smoothed Fig5.3
2/10
Example 5.1 : Compare between PSDFs obtained from the smoothed displacement RSP and FFT of Elcentro record.
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Degree of freedom is sway degree of freedom.
Sway d.o.f are obtained using condensation procedure; during the process, desired response quantities of interest are determined and stored in an array R for unit force applied at each sway d.o.f.
Frequencies & mode shapes are determined using M matrix & condensed K matrix.
For each mode find (Eq. 5.2) & obtain Pei (Eq. 5.9)
Application to 2D frames
i
1
2
1
(5.17)
Nr
irr
i Nr
irr
W
W
2/11
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Obtain ; is the modal peak response vector.
Use either CQC or SRSS rule to find mean peak response.
Example 5.2 : Find mean peak values of top dis-placement, base shear and inter storey drift between 1st & 2nd floors.
Contd…( 1... )j ejR RP j r R j
234
1 2
3
ω =5.06rad/s; ω =12.56rad/s;
ω =18.64rad/s; ω = .5rad/s
2/12
Solution :
;
;
T T1 2
T T3 4
φ = -1 -0.871 -0.520 -0.278 φ = -1 -0.210 0.911 0.752
φ = -1 0.738 -0.090 -0.347 φ = 1 -0.843 0.268 -0.145
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Approaches
Disp (m)Base shear in terms of
mass (m) Drift (m)
2 modes all modes 2 modes all modes 2 modes all modes
SRSS 0.9171 0.917 1006.558 1006.658 0.221 0.221
CQC 0.9121 0.905 991.172 991.564 0.214 0.214
ABSSUM 0.9621 0.971 1134.546 1152.872 0.228 0.223
Time
history0.8921 0.893 980.098 983.332 0.197 0.198
Table 5.1
Contd…2/13
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Analysis is performed for ground motion applied to each principal direction separately.
Following steps are adopted: Assume the floors as rigid diaphragms & find the centre of mass of each floor.
DYN d.o.f are 2 translations & a rotation; centers of mass may not lie in one vertical (Fig 5.4).
Apply unit load to each dyn d.o.f. one at a time & carry out static analysis to find condensed K matrix & R matrix as for 2D frames.
Repeat the same steps as described for 2D frame
Application to 3D tall frames 3/1
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
3/2
C.G. of mass line
1CM
2CM
3CM
L
L
L
L
gx
x
(a)
C.G. of mass line
1CM
2CM
3CM
L
L
L
L L
gx
x
(b)
Figure 5.4:
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Example 5.3 : Find mean peak values of top floor displacements , torque at the first floor & at the base of column A for exercise for problem 3.21. Use digitized values of the response spectrum of El centro earthquake ( Appendix 5A of the book).
Results are obtained following the steps of section 5.3.4.
Results are shown in Table 5.2.
Contd…
1 2 3
4 5 6
ω =13.516rad/s; ω =15.138rad/s; ω =38.731rad/s;
ω =39.633rad/s ; ω =45.952rad/s; ω =119.187rad/s
X YV and V
3/3
Solution :
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Approac
hes
displacement (m)Torque
(rad)Vx(N) Vy(N)
(1) (2) (3)
SRSS 0.1431 0.0034 0.0020 214547 44081
CQC 0.1325 0.0031 0.0019 207332 43376
Time
history
0.1216 0.0023 0.0016 198977 41205
TABLE 5.2
Contd…
Results obtained by CQC are closer to those of time history analysis.
3/4
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Response spectrum method is strictly valid for single point excitation.
For extending the method for multi support excitation, some additional assumptions are required.
Moreover, the extension requires a derivation through random vibration analysis. Therefore, it is not described here; but some features are given below for understanding the extension of the method to multi support excitation.
It is assumed that future earthquake is represented by an averaged smooth response spectrum & a PSDF obtained from an ensemble of time histories.
RSA for multi support excitation 3/5
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…3/6
Lack of correlation between ground motions at two points is represented by a coherence function.
Peak factors in each mode of vibration and the peak factor for the total response are assumed to be the same.
A relationship like Eqn. 5.16 is established between and PSDF.
Mean peak value of any response quantity r consists of two parts:
dS
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…
2
1
2 ; 1.. (5.18)s
i i i i i ki kk
z z z u i m
(5.19)i kki
i i
T
T
MR
M
3/7
• Pseudo static response due to the displacements of the supports
• Dynamic response of the structure with respect to supports.
Using normal mode theory, uncoupled dynamic equation of motion is written as:
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
If the response of the SDOF oscillator to then
Total response is given by
are vectors of size m x s (for s=3 & m=2)
Contd…
1 1
1 1 1
(5.21)
(5.22)
(5.23)
s m
k k i ik i
s m s
k k i ki kik i k
r t a u t z t
r t a u t z
r t
T Ta u t z t
3/8
k kiu is z
1
(5.20)s
i ki kik
z z
βφ and z
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Assuming to be random processes, PSDF of is given by:
Performing integration over the frequency range of interest & considering mean peak as peak factor multiplied by standard deviation, expected peak response may be written as:
Contd…
Tβ 1 11 1 21 1 31 2 12 2 22 2 32
T11 21 31 12 22 32
φ = β β β β β β ( 5.24a)
z = z z z z z z ( 5.24b)
tr t ,u t and z( )r t
(5.25)rrS T T T Tuu zz uz zua S a S a S S a
3/9
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…
....
1 2 3 S
12T T T Tuu uz βD βD zz βD βD zu
T1 p 2 p 3 p S p
TβD 1 11 11 1 21 21 1 s1 s1 m 11 1m
ij i j j
E max r t = b b+b φ +φ φ +φ b ( 5.26)
b = a u a u a u a u ( 5.27a)
φ = φ β D φ β D φ β D ...φ β D ( 5.27b)
D =D ω,ξ i=1,..,s ; j=1,..,m ( 5.27c)
and are the correlation matrices
whose elements are given by:
,uu u zl l z zl
i j i j
i j
α
uu uuu u -α
1= S ω dω ( 5.28)
σ σ
3/10
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…
i kj i k
i kj
α*
uz j uuu z -α
1= h S ω dω ( 5.29)
σ σ
ki lj k l
ki lj
α*
z z i j u uz z -α
1= hh S ω dω ( 5.30)
σ σ
i k i k g
1 12 2
uu u u u2 2
coh i,k1S = S S coh i,k = S ( 5.31)
ω ω
k l k l g
1 12 2
u u u u uS =S S coh k,l =coh k,l S ( 5.33)
i j i j g
1 12 2
uu u u u4 4
coh i, j1S = S S coh i, j = S ( 5.32)
ω ω
3/11
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd… ij i j jD =D ω,ξ For a single train of seismic wave,
that is displacement response spectrum for a specified ξ ; correlation matrices can be obtained if is additionally provided; can be
determined from (Eqn 5.6).
If only relative peak displacement is required,third term of Eqn.5.26 is only retained.
Steps for developing the program in MATLAB is given in the book.
coh( i, j ) j jD ω,ξ
u gS
Example 5.4 Example 3.8 is solved for El centro earthquake spectrum with time lag of 5s.
3/12
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…Solution :The quantities required for calculating the expected value are given below:
1 2
11 11 11 21 11 31 12 12 12 22 12 32
21 11 21 21 21 31 22 12 22 22 22 32
1 1 1 1 1 1 11; ; ,
0.5 1 0.5 1 1 1 13
12.24 rad/s ; 24.48rad/s
1 1 11;
1 1 13
0.0259 0.0259 0.0259 -TD
w w
T T
φ φ r
a
11 21 31 1
12 22 32 2
1 2
1 1 1 2
2 1
0.0015 -0.0015 -0.0015
0.0129 0.0129 0.0129 0.0015 0.0015 0.0015
( 12.24) 0.056m
( 24.48) 0.011m
05 10
, 0 ; exp ; exp2 2
0
D D D D
D D D D
coh i j
3/13
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
1 0.873 0.765
0.873 1 0.873
0.765 0.873 1
0.0382 0.0061 0.0027 0.0443 0.0062 0.0029
0.0063 0.0387 0.0063 0.0068 0.0447 0.0068
0.0027 0.0063 0.0387 0.0029 0.0068 0.0447
1 0.0008 0.0001 0.0142
0.0008 1 0
uu
uz
zz
0.0007 0.0001
.0008 0.0007 0.0142 0.0007
0.0001 0.0008 1 0.0001 0.0007 0.0142
0.0142 0.0007 0.0001 1 0.0007 0.0001
0.0007 0.0142 0.0007 0.0007 1 0.0007
0.0001 0.0007 0.0142 0.0001 0.0007 1
Contd… 3/14
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Mean peak values determined are:
Contd…
1 2
1 2
( ) 0.106 ; ( ) 0.099
( ) 0.045 ; ( ) 0.022tot tot
rel rel
u m u m
u m u m
For perfectly correlated ground motion1 0 0
0 1 0 null matrix
0 0 1
1 1 1 0 0 0
1 1 1 0 0 0
1 1 1 0 0 0
0 0 0 1 1 1
0 0 0 1 1 1
0 0 0 1 1 1
uu uz
zz
3/15
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd… Mean peak values of relative displacement
1
2
RSA RHA
u =0.078m ; 0.081m
u =0.039m ; 0.041m
It is seen that’s the results of RHA & RSA match well.
Another example (example 3.10) is solved for a time lag of a 2.5 sec.
Solution is obtained in the same way and results are given in the book. The calculation steps are self evident.
3/16
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Cascaded analysis Cascaded analysis is popular for seismic analysis of secondary systems (Fig 5.5).
RSA cannot be directly used for the total system because of degrees of freedom become prohibitively large ; entire system becomes nonclasically damped.
4/1
Secondary System
xg
..
..
k
c
m
xa = xf + xg
.. .. ..
Secondary system mountedon a floor of a building frame
SDOF is to be analyzed forobtaining floor response spectrum
xf Fig 5.5
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…In the cascaded analysis two systems- primary and secondary are analyzed separately; output of the primary becomes the input for the secondary.
In this context, floor response spectrum of the primary system is a popular concept for cascaded analysis. The absolute acceleration of the floor in the figure is
Pseudo acceleration spectrum of an SDOF is obtained for ; this spectrum is used for RSA of secondary systems mounted on the floor.
ax
ax
4/2
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…Example 5.6 For example 3.18, find the mean peak displacement of the oscillator for El Centro earthquake. for secondary system = 0.02 ; for the main system = 0.05 ;floor displacement spectrum shown in the Fig5.6 is usedSolution
4/3
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 400
0.5
1
1.5
Frequency (rad/sec)
Dis
pla
cem
en
t (m
)Using this spectrum, peak displacement of the secondary system with T=0.811s is 0.8635m.
The time history analysis for the entire system (with C matrix for P-S system) is found as 0.9163m.
Floor displacement response spectrum (Exmp. 5.6)
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Approximate modal RSA For nonclassically damped system, RSA cannot be directly used.
However, an approximate RSA can be performed.
C matrix for the entire system can be obtained (using Rayleigh damping for individual systems & then combining them without coupling terms)
matrix is obtained considering all d.o.f. & becomes non diagonal.
Ignoring off diagonal terms, an approximate modal damping is derived & is used for RSA.
1
2
0
0
CC
C
TC
4/4
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Seismic coefficient method Seismic coefficient method uses also a set of equivalent lateral loads for seismic analysis of structures & is recommended in all seismic codes along with RSA & RHA.
For obtaining the equivalent lateral loads, it uses some empirical formulae. The method consists of the following steps:
• Using total weight of the structure, base shear is obtained by
is a period dependent seismic coefficient
(5.34)b hV W C
hC
4/5
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…• Base shear is distributed as a set of lateral forces along the height as
bears a resemblance with that for the fundamental mode.
• Static analysis of the structure is carried out with the force .
Different codes provide different recommendations for the values /expressions for .
( ) (5.35)i b iF V f h
(i = 1,2...... n)iF
( ) if h
hC & ( ) if h
4/6
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
4/7
Distribution of lateral forces can be written as
j j j1
j j j1
j j1j b
j j1
j jj b
j j
kj j
j b kj j
Sa1F =ρ ×W ×φ × ( 5.36)1j j j1 g
F W ×φ= ( 5.37)
∑F ΣW ×φ
W ×φF =V × ( 5.38)
ΣW ×φ
W ×hF =V ( 5.39)
ΣW ×h
W ×hF =V ( 5.40)
ΣW ×h
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
4/8
Computation of base shear is based on first mode.
Following basis for the formula can be put forward.
i
i
i
i
aeb i
b b
a ei
a1b
SaiV =ΣF =( ΣW ×φ × )×λ ( 5.41)b ji j ji igiS
V =W ( 5.42)g
V ≤Σ V ( 5.43)
S≤Σ W i=1ton ( 5.44)
g
SV = ×W ( 5.45)
g
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Seismic code provisions All countries have their own seismic codes.
For seismic analysis, codes prescribe all three methods i.e. RSA ,RHA & seismic coefficient method.
Codes specify the following important factors for seismic analysis:
• Approximate calculation of time period for seismic coefficient method.
• plot.
• Effect of soil condition on
hC Vs T
a & h
SAor C
g g
5/1
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…• Seismicity of the region by specifying PGA.
• Reduction factor for obtaining design forces to include ductility in the design.
• Importance factor for structure.
Provisions of a few codes regarding the first three are given here for comparison. The codes include:
• IBC – 2000• NBCC – 1995• EURO CODE – 1995• NZS 4203 – 1992• IS 1893 – 2002
5/2
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…IBC – 2000
• for class B site,
• for the same site, is given by
hC
A
g
0.4 7.5 0 0.08s
1.0 0.08 0.4s (5.47)
0.40.4s
n n
n
nn
T TA
Tg
TT
1
11
1.0 0.4s
(5.46)0.40.4sh
T
CT
T
5/3
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd… T may be computed by
can have any reasonable distribution.
Distribution of lateral forces over the height is given by
iF
1
(5.49)k
j ji b N
kj j
j
W hF V
W h
2
11
1
2 (5.48)
N
i ii
N
i ii
WuT
g Fu
5/4
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…
Distribution of lateral force for nine story frame is shown in Fig5.8 by seismic coefficient method .
1 1 1 1k={1; 0.5 T +1.5 ; 2 for T ≤0.5s ; 0.5≤T ≤2.5s; T ≥2.5s ( 5.50)
0 2 41
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
Storey force
Sto
rey
T=2secT=1secT=0.4sec
W2
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
9@3m
Fig5.8
5/5
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd… NBCC – 1995
• is given by
• For U=0.4 ; I=F=1, variations of with T are given in Fig 5.9.
hCe
h e
C UC = ; C =USIF ( 5.51a);( 5.51b)
RA
S &g
0 0.5 1 1.51
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
Time period (sec)
Seis
mic
res
pons
e fa
ctor
S
Fig5.9
5/6
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…• For PGV = 0.4ms-1 , is given by
• T may be obtained by
• S and Vs T are compared in Fig 5.10 for v = 0.4ms-1 , I = F = 1; (acceleration and velocity related zone)
1N 22
i i11 N
i i1
FuT =2π ( 5.53)
g Fu
Ag
n
nn
1.2 0.03≤T ≤0.427sA
= ( 5.52)0.512T >0.427sg
T
A/g
h vz =z
5/7
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
1.4
Time period (sec)
A/g
SS
or
A/g
Fig5.10
5/8
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…
• Distribution of lateral forces is given by
1
t 1 b 1
b 1
0 T ≤0.7s
F = 0.07T V 0.7<T <3.6s ( 5.55)
0.25V T ≥3.6s
i ii b t N
i ii=1
WhF = V -F ( 5.54)
Wh
5/9
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…
1 c
1e -3
c1 c
1
A0≤T ≤T
gC = ( 5.57)
TAT ≥T
g T
5/10
EURO CODE 8 – 1995 • Base shear coefficient is given by
• is given by
• Pseudo acceleration in normalized form is given by Eqn 5.58 in which values of Tb,Tc,Td
sC
eCe
s
CC = (5.56)
q
b c dT T T
hard 0.1 0.4 3.0
med 0.15 0.6 3.0
soft 0.2 0.8 3.0 (A is multiplied by 0.9)
are
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…
5/11
• Pseudo acceleration in normalized form ,
is given by
0
nn b
b
b n c
cc n dg
n
c dn d2
n
T1+1.5 0≤T ≤T
T
2.5 T ≤T ≤TA
= ( 5.58)T2.5 T ≤T ≤Tu
T
T T2.5 T ≥T
T
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Rayleigh's method may be used for calculating T.
Distribution of lateral force is
Variation of are shown in Fig 5.11.
i i1i b N
i i1i=1
i ii b N
i ii=1
WφF =V ( 5.59)
Wφ
WhF =V ( 5.60)
Wh
/ & /e go goc u A u
5/12
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Time period (sec)
A/ug0
Ce/ug0
Ce /u
g0 o
r A
/ug
0
..
....
..
..
Fig 5.11
5/13
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd… NEW ZEALAND CODE ( NZ 4203: 1992)
• Seismic coefficient & design response curves are the same.
• For serviceability limit,
is a limit factor.
• For acceleration spectrum, is replaced by T.
b 1 s 1
b s 1
C T =C T ,1 RzL T ≥0.45 ( 5.61a)
=C 0.4,1 RzL T ≤0.45 ( 5.61b)
sL
1T
6/1
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…
• Lateral load is multiplied by 0.92.
• Fig5.12 shows the plot of
• Distribution of forces is the same as Eq.5.60
• Time period may be calculated by using Rayleigh’s method.
• Categories 1,2,3 denote soft, medium and hard.
• R in Eq 5.61 is risk factor; Z is the zone factor; is the limit state factor.
1bc vs T for
sl
6/2
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
Time period (sec)
Category 1
Category 2
Category 3
Cb
Fig5.12
6/3
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd… IS CODE (1893-2002)
• are the same; they are given by:
ae
SC vs T & vs T
g
• Time period is calculated by empirical formula and distribution of force is given by:
2j j
j b N2
j jj=1
WhF =V ( 5.65)
Wh
a
1+15T 0≤T ≤0.1sS
= 2.5 0.1≤T ≤0.4s for hard soil ( 5.62)g
10.4≤T ≤4.0s
T
6/4
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…
a
a
1+15T 0≤T ≤0.1sS
= 2.5 0.1≤T ≤0.55s for mediumsoil ( 5.63)g
1.360.55≤T ≤4.0s
T
1+15T 0≤T ≤0.1sS
= 2.5 0.1≤T ≤0.67s for soft soil ( 5.64)g
1.670.67≤T ≤4.0s
T
6/5
For the three types of soil Sa/g are shown in Fig 5.13
Sesmic zone coefficients decide about the PGA values.
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
6/6
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 40
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
Time period (sec)
Hard Soil
Medium Soil
Soft Soil
Sp
ectr
al accele
rati
on
coeffi
cie
nt
(Sa/g
)
Variations of (Sa/g) with time period TFig 5.13
Contd…
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…Example 5.7: Seven storey frame shown in Fig 5.14 is analyzed with
For mass: 25% for the top three & rest 50% of live load are considered.
1 2 3T =0.753s ; T =0.229s ; T =0.111s
R =3; PGA =0.4g ; for NBCC, PGA ≈0.65gSolution: First period of the structure falls in the falling region of the response spectrum curve.
In this region, spectral ordinates are different for different codes.
-3 7 -2
-1
Concrete density =24kNm ; E =2.5×10 kNm
Live load =1.4kNm
6/7
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
6/8
A Seven storey-building frame for analysisFig 5.14
5m 5m 5m
7@3m
All beams:-23cm 50cm
Columns(1,2,3):-55cm 55cm
Columns(4-7):-:-45cm 45cm
Contd…
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…Table 5.3: Comparison of results obtained by different codes
Codes
Base shear (KN)1st Storey Displacement
(mm)Top Storey Displacement
(mm)
SRSS CQC SRSS CQC SRSS CQC
3 all 3 all 3 all 3 all 3 all 3 all
IBC 33.51 33.66 33.52 33.68 0.74 0.74 0.74 0.74 10.64 10.64 10.64 10.64
NBCC 35.46 35.66 35.46 35.68 0.78 0.78 0.78 0.78 11.35 11.35 11.35 11.35
NZ 4203
37.18 37.26 37.2 37.29 0.83 0.83 0.83 0.83 12.00 12.00 12.00 12.00
Euro 8 48.34 48.41 48.35 48.42 1.09 1.09 1.09 1.09 15.94 15.94 15.94 15.94
Indian 44.19 44.28 44.21 44.29 0.99 0.99 0.99 0.99 14.45 14.45 14.45 14.45
6/9
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd…
0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 161
2
3
4
5
6
7
Displacement (mm)
Nu
mb
er o
f st
orey
IBC
NBCC
NZ 4203
Euro 8
Indian
Comparison of displacements obtained by different codesFig 5.15
6/10
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Lec-1/74
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Chapter - 6
Inelastic Seismic Response of Structures
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Introduction Under relatively strong earthquakes, structures undergo inelastic deformation due to current seismic design philosophy.
Therefore, structures should have sufficient ductility to deform beyond the yield limit.
For understanding the ductility demand imposed by the earthquake, a study of an SDOF system in inelastic range is of great help.
The inelastic excursion takes place when the restoring force in the spring exceeds or equal to the yield limit of the spring.
1/1
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
For this, nonlinear time history analysis of SDOF system under earthquake is required; similarly, nonlinear analysis of MDOF system is useful for understanding non-linear behaviour of MDOF system under earthquakes.
Nonlinear analysis is required for other reasons as well such as determination of collapse state, seismic risk analysis and so on.
Finally, for complete understanding of the inelastic behavior of structures, concepts of ductility and inelastic response spectrum are required.The above topics are discussed here.
Contd.. 1/2
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Non linear dynamic analysis If structure have nonlinear terms either in inertia or in damping or in stiffness or in any form of combination of them, then the equation of motion becomes nonlinear.
More common nonlinearities are stiffness and damping nonlinearities.
In stiffness non linearity, two types of non linearity are encountered :
• Geometric• Material (hysteretic type)
Figure 6.1 shows non hysteric type non linearity; loading & unloading path are the same.
1/3
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd..
f
Loading
Loading
Unloading
Unloading
x
x
Fig.6.1
1/4
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd.. Figure 6.2 shows hysteric type nonlinearity; experimental curves are often idealised as (i) elasto plastic; (ii) bilinear hysteretic ; (iii) general strain hardening
yx
f
x
yf
yx
f
x
yf
yf
f
xyx
yf
yx
f
x
Variation of force with displacement under cyclic loading
Idealized model of forcedisplacement curve
Idealized model of forcedisplacement curveFig.6.2
1/5
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Equation of motion for non linear analysis takes the form
and matrices are constructed for the current time interval.
Equation of motion for SDOF follows as
Solution of Eqn. 6.2 is performed in incremental form; the procedure is then extended for MDOF system with additional complexity.
and should have instantaneous values.
Contd..
mΔx + c Δx + k Δx = -mΔx (6.2)gt t
1/6
(6.1)K gt t M x C x x Mr x
KtCt
Ct Kt
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
and are taken as that at the beginning of the time step; they should be taken as average values.
Since are not known, It requires an iteration.
For sufficiently small , iteration may be avoided.
NewMark’s in incremental form is used for the solution
tc tk
xx &
t
Method
Contd..
k
22
k k
Δx=Δtx +δΔtΔx ( 6.3)
ΔtΔx=Δtx + x +β Δt Δx ( 6.4)
2
1/7
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd..
k k2
k k
t t 2
g t k t k
k+1 k k+1 k k+
1 1 1Δx= Δx- x - x ( 6.5)
βΔt 2ββ Δt
δ δ δΔx= Δx- x +Δt 1- x ( 6.6)
βΔt β 2β
kΔx=Δp ( 6.7)
δ 1k=k + c + m ( 6.8a)
βΔt β Δt
m δ m δΔp=-mΔx + + c x + +Δt -1 c x ( 6.8b)
βΔt β 2β 2β
x =x +Δx x =x +Δx x 1 k=x +Δx ( 6.9)
1/8
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis81
For more accurate value of acceleration, it is calculated from Eq. 6.2 at k+1th step.
The solution is valid for non hysteretic non linearity.
For hysteretic type, solution procedure is modified & is first explained for elasto - plastic system.
Solution becomes more involved because loading and unloading paths are different. As a result, responses are tracked at every time step of the solution in order to determine loading and unloading of the system and accordingly, modify the value of kt.
Contd.. 1/9
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Elasto-plastic non linearity For material elasto plastic behaviour, is taken to be constant.
is taken as k or zero depending upon whether the state is in elastic & plastic state (loading & unloading).
State transition is taken care of by iteration procedure to minimize the unbalanced force; iteration involves the following steps.
Elastic to plastic state
tc
tk
0(6.10)ee
x a x
1/10
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
p e t( Δx) for( 1-a )Δpwithk =0
e pΔx=( Δx) +( Δx)
Contd.. Use Eq. 6.7, find
Plastic to plastic state Eq. 6.7 with Kt=0 is used ; transition takes place if at the end of the step; computation is then restarted.
Plastic to elastic state Transition is defined by is factored (factor e) such that is obtained for with
x<0
x=0
a( Δx) 1-e Δptk ≠ 0
aΔx=( Δx) +Factored Δx
x=0x
1/11
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Example 6.1 Refer fig. 6.3 ; ; find responses at t=1.52 s & 1.64s given responses at t= 1.5s & 1.62s ; m=1kg
Solution:
sradn /10
Contd.. 2/1
xxf
m
c
gx..
SDOF system with non-linear spring
0.15mg
0.0147m x
xf
Force-displacement behaviour of the spring
Fig . 6.3
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis85
t =1.5s; x = 0.01315m; x = 0.1902m/s;
2 -1x = 0.46964 m/s ; f =1.354 ; c =0.4Nsm ;x t-1k =100Nmt
-1k=10140Nm
Δx =-0.00312gg
Δp=37.55N
-1Δx=0.0037m; Δx=-0.01ms ; Δf=k Δxt( f ) =1.7243N>0.15mgx t+Δt( f ) +eΔxk =0.15mg( e=0.3176)x t t
2/2
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd..
X +ΔX =0t 1
-1kΔx = 1-e Δp; k =0; Δx=0.00373m; Δx=-0.00749mst2-1x =x +Δx +Δx =0.01725m x =0.1827mst 1t+Δt 2 t+Δt
P -c x - ftk+1 k+1 x( k+1) -1x = = 0.279msk+1 mAt t=1.625s ; x>0 ; k =10040; Δp=-0.4173; Δx=0.000042;
Δx=-0.061;
; e=-6.8; Δx =eΔx=-0.000283;1-5kΔx = 1-e Δp; k =100; Δx=Δx +Δx =-4.44×10 ; Δx=-0.061;t 12 2
x =x +Δx =0.0298; x =x +Δx=-0.033t tt+Δt t+Δtx from Eqn =3.28; f =f +k Δx =1.4435Nxt tt+Δt t+Δt 2
2/3
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Solution for MDOF System
Sections undergoing yielding are predefined and their force- deformation behaviour are specified as shown in Fig 6.4.
0.5k
k
1.5k
k
0.5m
m
m
m
3yx
2yx
1yx
3pV
2pV
1pV
0.5k
k
1.5k
k
x
x
x
Fig.6.4
For the solution of Eqn. 6.1, state of the yield section is examined at each time step.
2/4
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Depending upon the states of yield sections, stiffness of the members are changed & the stiffness matrix for the incremental equation is formed.
If required, iteration is carried out as explained for SDOF.
Solution for MDOF is an extension of that of SDOF.
Contd..
t t 2
g t k t k
KΔx=Δp ( 6.11)
δ 1K =K + C + M ( 6.12a)
βΔt β Δt
M δ M δΔp=-M rΔx + + C x + +Δt -1 C x ( 6.12b)
βΔt β 2β 2β
2/5
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Example 6.2: Refer to Fig 6.5; K/m = 100; m = 1 kg; find responses at 3.54s. given those at 3.52s.
Solution:
Contd..
1.44977 0.15mg
f = 0.95664 < 0.15mg and x>0k0.63432 0.15mg
10260 symδ 1
K=K + C + M= -124 10260t t 2βΔt β( Δt) 0 -124 10137
Δx =0.5913g
M δ M δΔp=-MIΔx + + C x + +Δt -1 C xg t tk kβΔt β 2β 2β
32.6224
= 18.0256
8.4376
0.0032-1Δx=K Δp= 0.0018
0.0009
2/6
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
k/2
k/2
m
m
m k/2
k/2
k/2 k/2
3m
3m
3m
1x
2x
3x
yxx
yf
0.15m gyf
0.01475myx
3 storey frame
Force displacementcurve of the column
Contd..
Fig.6.5
2/7
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd..
0.0032 0.16K
Δx= -0.0014 ; Δf= Δx= -0.072
-0.0009 -0.045
e( 0.16)1.60977 0.15mg1f =f +Δf = 0.88664 f +eΔf=f + e ( -0.07) = ≤0.15mgk+1 k k k 2
0.58932 ≤0.15mge( -0.045)3e =0.136;1
e =1; e =12 3
e Δx e Δx1 1 1 1Δx =Δx = e Δx +e ( Δx -Δx ) = e Δxe 1 1 1 12 2 2 2
e Δx +e ( Δx -Δx )+e( Δx -Δx ) e Δx1 1 12 2 3 3 2 3 3
e0.000435 0.13581= -0.000965 e = 0.68932
-0.001865 3.07e3
2/8
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
0.0028 0.00324 0.02009
Δx = 0.0027 ; Δx=Δx +Δx = 0.0018 ; x =x +Δx= 0.0083312 2 k+1 k0.0026 0.00074 0.0114
0.-0.0509 0δ δ δ
Δx= Δx- x +Δt 1- x = -0.0406 ; x =x +Δx=k k k+1 kβΔt β 2β-0.0524
.1361
0.07
0.0165
e( 0.16) 0.00 0.0218 1.47151Δf= e ( -0.07) + -0.005 = -0.075 ; f =f +Δf= 0.8822 k+1 k
-0.005 -0.05 0.584e( -0.045)3-2.289
-1x =M P -C x -F = -1.7tk+1 k+1 k+1 k+1
018
-2.2825
Contd.. 2/9
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Bidirectional interaction assumes importance under:
• Analysis for two component earthquake • Torsionally Coupled System
For such cases, elements undergo yielding depending upon the yield criterion used.
When bidirectional interaction of forces on yielding is considered, yielding of a cross section depends on two forces.
None of them individually reaches yield value; but the section may yield.
Bidirectional Interaction3/1
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
If the interaction is ignored, yielding in two directions takes place independently.
In incremental analysis, the interaction effect is included in the following way.
Refer Fig 6.6; columns translate in X and Y directions with stiffness and .
Contd..
eyikexik
i i i i
ex ex y
e ey ey x
ex y ey x θ
ex ex ey ey θ ex y ey x
K 0 K e
K = 0 K K e ( 6.13a)
K e K e K
K = K ; K = K ; K = K e + K e ( 6.13b)
3/2
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd..
xe
ye
D
D
Colm. 1
Colm. 2
Colm. 3
Colm. 4
CR
Y
XC.M.
Fig.6.6
3/3
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Transient stiffness remaining constant over is given by
The elements of the modification matrix are
t
pK
Contd..
t e pK =K -K ( 6.14)
22yi xi yixi
pxi pyi pxyi pyxii i i
2 2i exi xi eyi yi
xi exi xi yi eyi yi
yixixi yi2 2
pxi pyi
B B BBK = ; K = ; K =K = ( 6.15)
G G G
G =K h +K h ( 6.16a)
B =K h ; B =K h ( 6.16b)
VVh = ; h = ( 6.16c)
V V
3/4
tK
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
When any of the column is in the full plastic state satisfying yield criterion, .
During incremental solution changes as the elements pass from E-P, P-P, P-E; the change follows E-P properties of the element & yield criterion.
Yield criterion could be of different form; most popular yield curve is
tk =0
tk
Contd..
2 2
yixii
pxi pyi
VV= + ( 6.19)
V V
3/5
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
For , curve is circular ; , curve is ellipse; shows plastic state, shows elastic state, is inadmissible. If , internal forces of the elements are pulled back to satisfy yield criterion; equilibrium is disturbed, corrected by iteration.
The solution procedure is similar to that for SDOF.
At the beginning of time , check the states of the elements & accordingly the transient stiffness matrix is formed.
pyipxi VV pyipxi VV 1i 1i
1i
1i
Contd.. 3/6
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
If any element violates the yield condition at the end of time or passes from E-P, then an iteration scheme is used.
If it is P-P & for any element, then an average stiffness predictor- corrector scheme is employed. The scheme consists of :
is obtained with for the time internal Δt & incremental restoring force vector is obtained.
1i
Contd..
1U taK
1 1
1
1
(6.21)
(6.22 )
(6.22 )
ta
i i
i i
force tolerance a
displacement tolerance b
F K U
F F
U U
3/7
1 'K = K +Kta tt02
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
After convergence , forces are calculated & yield criterion is checked ; element forces are pulled back if criterion is violated.
With new force vector is calculated & iteration is continued.
For E-P, extension of SDOF to MDOF is done.
For calculating , the procedure as given in SDOF is adopted.
taK
Contd..
1(6.23)i i
i F F
pU
3/8
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
If one or more elements are unloaded from plastic to elastic state, then plastic work increments for the elements are negative
When unloaded, stiffness within , is taken as elastic. Example 6.3: Consider the 3D frame in Fig 6.8; assume:
t
Contd..
1
(6.25)
(6.26)
pi i pi
pi i ei i
Fw U
U U K F
px py p 0 p p oBA D
op o x y o B C o C oC A
x y P A
D=3.5m;h=3.5m; M =M =M =M ; M = M =1.5M
kM =2M ; k =k =k =k ;k =k =1.5k ;k =2k ; =50
min which m =m =m=620kg and V =152.05
3/9
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
find Initial stiffness & stiffness at t = 1.38s, given that t = 1.36s
Contd.. 3/10
2k
k
y
x3.5m
1.5k
1.5k
3.5m
3.5m
A
B C
D
3 D frame For column A
Displacement (m)0.00467m
152.05 N
For
ce (
N)
Force-displacementcurve of column A
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis103
3/11
U UU 0.00336 0.13675 -0.16679x xxU = 0.00037 U = 0.00345 U = -0.11434y y y
0.00003 0.00311 -0.06153θ θ θk k k
V 627.27xF = V = 70.yk
Vθ k
V =102.83 V =10.10Ax Ay
V =154.24 V =19.56Bx By888 ; x =-0.08613g gkV =158.66 V =15.15Dx Dy773.51
V =211.54 V =26.08Cx CySolution:
Forces in the columns are pulled back (Eq. 6.23) & displacements at the centre
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd..
2
2
ex exi 0 ey eyi 0 θ 0
e
2 2
yixii
pxi pyi
A B C D
t e
t t t2
KDK = K =6k ; K = K =6k ;K = =3k 3.5
4186000 0 54250
K = 0 186000 54250
54250 54250 1139250
VV= +
V V
=0.462 ; =0.465; =0.491; =0.488
K =K
δ 1K=K + C + M=K +1
βΔt β( Δt)
4
g t k t k
638.6 sym
0 638.6
5.425 5.425 1379.76
0000M= ×10
16282M δ M δ
Δp=-MΔx + + C U + +Δt -1 C U = 286βΔt β 2β 2β
612
3/12
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
With the e values calculated as above, the forces in the columns are pulled back
-1t
k+1 k
Ax
Bxk+1 k
Dx
Cx
0.0025 476.1
ΔU=K Δp= 0.000001 and ΔF=K ΔU= 10.2
0.000001 181.2
0.0059
U =U +ΔU= 0.0004
0.0001
VV =183.891103.36
V =275.84F =F +ΔF= 81.09 ; ;
V =275.84954.75
V =367.79
Ay
By
Dy
Cy
2 2
yixii A B C D
pxi pyi
A B D CA B D C
=13.52V =20.27V =20.27V =27.03
VV= + & =1.47 ; =1.47 ; =1.47 ; =1.47
V V
1 1 1 1e = 0.824 e = =0.824 e = =0.824 e = =0.824
Contd.. 3/13
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
5 3
2
2
0.254 0.83
0.00122 10 ; is calculed as 0.83 10 in which .
0.00124 0.83
16268.57
(1 ) 285.76
631.48
0.29167
0.00795
0.00;
xee x
x
i ix y
i
xA
xBxixi
pxi
Ue = etc
U
e
K xe e
K
h
hVh
V
U e
p p
2
0.00059
0.0003953; ;
0.000390.0053
0.000290.00398
yA
yByiyi
yDxD pyi
yCxC
h
hVh
hh V
hh
Contd.. 3/14
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis107
2 2
22 2
246.56 18.12
246.56 18.12; ; ;
246.56 18.12
246.56 18.12
1.972
1.314;
1.314
0.98
; ; ;2
xA yA
xB yBxi exi xi yi eyi yi
xD yD
xC xC
A
Bi exi xi eyi yi
D
C
yixipxi pyi p p pxyi pyxi
i i
B B
B BB K h B K h
B B
B By
G
GG K h K h
G
G
BB DK K K K K K
G G
xi yi
i
B B
G
Contd.. 3/15
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd..
3
5
2
1
1.0
16.06 185 10
0.29 53.96 0
621
10000 10 0.16 63.85( )
0 0.54 126.6
0.2917; 0.2917
0.0026
0.0001 ;
0.00
t
t t t
Pyi i Pxi ixp yp
Pyi Pxi
p
sym
sym
t t
K x K ye e
K K
2 2
K
K K C M = K M =
U K p U
0.002598 0.0000983
0.002598 0.0001018;
0.002602 0.0000983
0.002602 0.0001018
x py
U
3/16
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd..
2 2
9.78151.913
11.54228.043;
11.37227.745
10.98303.471
1.002; 1.002; 1.0; 1.00
ex px pxy px
pipxy ey py pyi i
AyAx
ByBx
DyDx
CyCx
yixii
pxi pyi
A C D
K K K U
K K K U
VV
VV
VV
VV
VV
V V
B
V
3/17
Because yield condition is practically satisfied, no further iteration is required.
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Multi Storey Building frames For 2D frames, inelastic analysis can be done without much complexity.
Potential sections of yielding are identified & elasto–plastic properties of the sections are given.
When IMI = Mp for any cross section, a hinge is considered for subsequent & stiffness matrix of the structure is generated.
If IMI > Mp for any cross section at the end of IMI is set to Mp, the response is evaluated with average of stiffness at t and (IMI = Mp ).
t
t
tt
4/1
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
At the end of each , velocity is calculated at each potential hinge; if unloading takes place at the end of , then for next , the section behaves elastically. ( ).
t
t
t~t small
Contd..
Example 6.4 Find the time history of moment at A & the force-displacement plot for the frame shown in Fig 6.9under El centro earthquake; ; compare the results for elasto plastic & bilinear back bone curves.
• Figs. 6.10 & 6.11 are for the result of elasto -plastic case Figs 6.12 & 6.13 are for the result of bilinear case • Moment in Fig 6.12 does not remain constant over time unlike elasto-plastic case.
st 2.0
4/2
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
4/3
k
k
k
k3m
3m
3m 1.5k
A
1.5k
m
m
m
1x
2x
3x
k = 23533 kN/m
m = 235.33 103 kg
iK
dK
0.1diKK
0.01471m Displacement (m)
346.23kN
For
ce (
kN
)Frame
Force-displacementcurve of column
Contd..
Fig.6.9
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
4/4
-600000
-400000
-200000
0
200000
400000
600000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (sec)
Mo
men
t (N
-m)
-400000
-300000
-200000
-100000
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03 0.035
Displacement (m)
For
ce (
N)
Contd..
Fig.6.10
Fig.6.11
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
4/5
-500000
-400000
-300000
-200000
-100000
0
100000
200000
300000
400000
500000
-0.005 0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02 0.025 0.03
Displacement(m)
Shear
Fo
rce(N
)-800000
-600000
-400000
-200000
0
200000
400000
600000
800000
0 5 10 15 20 25 30
Time (sec)
Mom
ent (
N-m
)Contd..
Fig.6.13
Fig.6.12
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
For nonlinear moment rotation relationship, tangent stiffness matrix for each obtained by considering slope of the curve at the beginning of If unloading takes place, initial stiffness is considered. Slopes of backbone curve may be interpolated ; interpolation is used for finding initial stiffness. If columns are weaker than the beams, then top & bottom sections of the column become potential sections for plastic hinge. During integration of equation of motion is given by
t
t
Contd..4/6
tK
(6.27)t e p K K K
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Non zero elements of Kp are computed using Eqns. 6.15 & 6.16 and are arranged so that they correspond to the degrees of freedom affected by plastification.
The solution procedure remains the same as described before.
If 3D frame is weak beam-strong column system, then problem becomes simple as the beams undergo only one way bending.
The analysis procedure remains the same as that of 2D frame.
Contd.. 4/7
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
For 2D & 3D frames having weak beam strong column systems, rotational d.o.f are condensed out; this involves some extra computational effort.
The procedure is illustrated with a frame as shown in the figure (with 2 storey).
Contd..
• Incremental rotations at the member ends are calculated from incremental displacements.
• Rotational stiffness of member is modified if plastification/ unloading takes place.
• The full stiffness matrix is assembled & rotational d.o.f. are condensed out.
4/8
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Elasto-plastic nature of the yield section is shown in Fig 6.16.
Considering anti-symmetry :
Contd.. 4/9
p
M1, M2
Mp1 = Mp2 = Mp3
Moment-rotation relationship
of elasto-plastic beamfig. 6.16
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
4/10
1
22 2
11
22 2
2
kl klk -k - -
2 2Δkl
-k 2k 0Δ2
K= ( 6.28a)kl kl kl kl θ
- α +0.672 2 2 6 θkl kl kl
- 0 α +1.332 6 2
-1Δ Δ Δθ θ θΔ
-1
1-1θ 2
2
-1
1
2
-1
1Δ
2
K =K -K K K ( 6.28b)
3 α +0.67 16K = ( 6.29a)
1 3 α +1.33kl
3 α +0.67 11 -13θ= Δ ( 6.29b)
1 3 α +1.331 0l
3 α +0.67 11 -1 -1 -1 1 -13kK =k - ( 6.30)
1 3 α +1.33-1 2 1 0 1 0l
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd.. Equation of motion for the frame is given by:
The solution requires to be computed at time t; this requires to be calculated.
Following steps are used for the calculation
Δt g
Δ0
MΔx+CΔx+K Δx=-MIΔx ( 6.31)
C =αK +βM ( 6.32)
4/11
tK
21 &
x =x +Δx ; x =x +Δx ( 6.33a)i i-1 i-1 i i-1 i-1M =M +ΔM ; M =M +ΔM ( 6.33b)1i 1i-1 1i-1 2i 2i-1 2i-1
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
& are obtained using Eqn. 6.29b in which values are calculated as:
& are then obtained; and hence & & are calculated from and , is obtained using ( Eq. 6.30).
If Elasto-plastic state is assumed, then for at the beginning of the time interval; for unloading are obtained by (Eq.6.28a.)
11 i 12 i
Contd..
1i-1 2i-11 2
c c
1i-1 2i-11i-1 2i-1
1i-1 2i-1
r l r lα = & α =
6EI 6EI
M Mr = ; r =
θ θ
4/12
11 iM 12 iMiM1 iM 2 1 2 iM1
tKiM 2
021 P 21
21 &
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd..
Example 6.5: For the frame shown in Fig 6.17, find the stiffness matrix at t = 1.36 s given the response quantities in Table 6.1
4/13
k
k
k
k3m
3m
3m
5m
1θ
2θ
3θ
4θ
5θ
6θ
k k
1
2
3
E = 2.48 107 kN/m2
Beam 30 40 cm
Column 30 50 cm
Frame
1
3
5
2
4
6
50KN-m
M
θY = 0.00109 rad θ
Force-displacement curve Fig. 6.17
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis123
4/14
JointTimeStep
x θ M
sec m m/s m/s2 rad rad/s rad/s2 kNm
1 1.36 0.00293 0.0341 -1.2945 0.00109 0.013 -0.452 50
3 1.36 0.00701 0.0883 -2.8586 0.00095 0.014 -0.297 -23.18
5 1.36 0.00978 0.1339 -3.4814 0.00053 0.009127 -0.098 42.89
2 1.36 0.00293 0.0341 -1.2945 0.00109 0.013 -0.452 -50
4 1.36 0.00701 0.0883 -2.8586 0.00095 0.014 -0.297 23.18
6 1.36 0.00978 0.1339 -3.4814 0.00053 0.009127 -0.098 -42.89
xx
Table shows that sections 1 & 2 undergo yielding; recognising this, stiffness matrices are given below:
x
x x θ θ
Table 6.1
Contd..
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
1
2
3
14
2
3
4
5
6
Δ1.067
Δ-1.067 2.133 sym
Δ0 -1.067 2.133
θ0.8 -0.8 0 2.4
Κ = 4.83×10 × θ0.8 0 -0.8 0.8 4
θ0 0.8 0 0 0.8 3.2
θ0.8 -0.8 0 0.4 0 0 2.4
θ0.8 0 -0.8 0 0.4 0 0.8 4
θ0 0.8 0 0 0 0 0 0.8 3.2
14
Δ 2
3
0.4451 sym Δ
Κ = 4.83×10 × -0.6177 1.276 Δ
0.2302 -1.0552 1.811 Δ
Contd.. 4/15
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Push over analysis is a good nonlinear static (substitute) analysis for the inelastic dynamic analysis.
It provides load Vs deflection curve from rest to ultimate failure.
Load is representative of equivalent static load taken as a mode of the structure & total load is conveniently the base shear.
Deflection may represent any deflection & can be conveniently taken as the top deflection.
Push over analysis 5/1
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
It can be force or displacement control depending upon whether force or displacement is given an increment.
For both , incremental nonlinear static analysis is ‘performed by finding matrix at the beginning of each increment.
Displacement controlled pushover analysis is preferred because, the analysis can be carried out up to a desired displacement level.
Following input data are required in addition to the fundamental mode shape(if used).
tK
Contd.. 5/2
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Assumed collapse mechanism
Moment rotation relationship of yielding section.
Limiting displacement.
Rotational capacity of plastic hinge.
Contd..
Displacement controlled pushover analysis is carried out in following steps:
Choose suitable
Corresponding to , find
1
1
5/3
rr 11
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Obtain ; obtain At nth increment,
At the end of each increment , moments are checked at all potential locations of plastic hinge.
For this, is calculated from condensation relationship.
If , then ordinary hinge is assumed at that section to find K for subsequent increment.
Contd..1 p
iBn VBV 1 1n i
1BV
n
PMM ||
5/4
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd.. Rotations at the hinges are calculated at each step after they are formed.
If rotational capacity is exceeded in a plastic hinge, rotational hinge failure precedes the mechanism of failure.
is traced up to the desired displacement level.
iB 1iV Vs Δ
Example 6.6
Carry out an equivalent static nonlinear analysis for the frame shown in Fig 6.19.
5/5
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Cross section
Location b (mm) d (mm) (kNm) (rad) (rad)
C1 G,1st, 2nd 400 400 168.9 9.025E-3 0.0271C2 3rd ,4th, 5th & 6th 300 300 119.15 0.0133 0.0399B1 G,1st, 2nd 400 500 205.22 6.097E-3 0.0183B2 3rd ,4th, 5th & 6th 300 300 153.88 8.397E-3 0.0252
yMymax
Contd..
3m
3m
3m
3m
3m
4m 4m
3m
3m
yM
y c
Frame Moment rotationcurve for beams
Fig.6.19
Table 6.2
5/6
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd..
D (m)Base shear
(KN) Plastic Hinges at section0.110891 316.825 10.118891 317.866 1,20.134891 319.457 1,2,30.142891 320.006 1,2,3,40.150891 320.555 1,2,3,4,50.174891 322.201 1,2,3,4,5,60.190891 323.299 1,2,3,4,5,6,70.206891 324.397 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,80.310891 331.498 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,90.318891 332.035 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,100.334891 333.11 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,110.350891 334.185 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,120.518891 342.546 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,130.534891 343.207 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,140.622891 346.843 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,151.448699 307.822 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,161.456699 308.225 1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17
Table 6.3
Solution is obtained by SAP2000.
5/7
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd..
0.9143
1
0.7548
0.5345
0.3120
0.1988
0.0833
Fig.6.20
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1 1.2 1.4 1.6 1.8 20
100
200
300
400
Bas
e sh
ear
(kN
)
Roof displacement (m)
Fig.6.21
5/8
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd..
2 1
3 3 3
4
516 17
5
67
8 8
1211
1310 9
14 1515
Fig.6.22
5/9
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Ductility & Inelastic spectrum A structure is designed for a load less than that obtained from seismic coefficient method or RSA (say, for
The structure will undergo yielding, if it is subjected to the expected design earthquake.
The behavior will depend upon the force deformation characteristics of the sections.
The maximum displacements & deformations of the structure are expected to be greater than the yield displacements.
)43(./ RRVB
6/1
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd.. How much the structure will deform beyond the yield limit depends upon its ductility; ductility factor is defined as
xmμ = ( 6.35a)xy
For explaining ductility , two SDOFs are considered with elasto – plastic behavior & the other a corresponding elastic system shown in Fig 6.23.
f
x
yf
yx ox
of
Stiffness k
Elastic
Elasto-plastic
mxFig. 6.23
6/2
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
means that the strength of the SDOF system is halved compared to the elastic system.
With the above definitions, equation of motion of SDOF system becomes:
2YR
YRyf
Contd.. An associated factor, called yield reduction factor, is defined as inverse of :
Y YY
0 0
f xf = = ( 6.35b)
f x
ym my
0 y 0 y
xx x μ= × =μf = ( 6.36)
x x x R
6/3
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
yy
2yy n 0 y
f( x,x)f( x,x)= ; x( t)=μ( t)x ;
f
fa = =ω x fm
Contd..
2n n y y g
g2 2n n y n
y
x+2ξω x+ω x f( x,x)=-x ( 6.37)
xμ+2ξω x+ω x f( μ,μ)=-ω ( 6.38)
a
depends upon .,, yn f
6/4
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Time history analysis shows the following :
For , responses remain within elastic limit & may be more than that for .
For , two counteracting effects take place (i) decrease of response due to dissipation of energy (ii) increase of response due to decreased equivalent stiffness.
Less the value of , more is the permanent deformation at the end .
1Yf1Yf
1Yf
Yf
Contd..
is known if for a & can be calculated.
mx Yf 0x
6/5
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Effect of time period on are illustrated in Fig 6.24.
For long periods, & independent of ; .
In velocity sensitive region, may be smaller or greater than ; not significantly affected by ; may be smaller or larger than .
In acceleration sensitive region, ; increases with decreasing ; ; for shorter period, can be very high (strength not very less).
Yf
, , ,m o Yx x f
goom xxx
Yf
YR
mxox
YR
Contd..
om xx TfY & YR
6/6
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd..
0 1m g yx x f
0m gxx
0.125y
f
0.25y
f
0.5y
f
Disp.sensitive
Vel.sensitive
Acc.sensitive
0.01 0.05 0.1 0.5 1 5 10 50 1000.001
0.005
0.01
0.05
0.1
0.51
5
10
0.001
0.005
0.01
0.05
0.1
0.51
5
10T a
=0.
035
T f=
15
T b=
0.12
5
T c=
0.5
T d=
3
T e=
1 0
Spectral Regions
x 0/x
g 0or
x m/x
g0
T (sec)n
0.5y
f
0.25y
f 0.125yf
1yf
Disp.sensitive
Vel.sensitive
Acc.sensitive
0.01 0.050.1 0.5 1 5 10 50 1000.1
0.5
1
5
10
Spectral Regions
x m/x 0
0.1
0.5
1
5
10
T (sec)n
T a=0
.035
T f=1
5
T b=0
.125
T c=0
.5
T d=3
T e= 1
0
Normalized peakdeformations for elasto-plastic
system and elastic system Ratio of thepeak deformations Fig. 6.24
6/7
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Inelastic response spectrum is plotted for :
For a fixed value of , and plots of against are the inelastic spectra or ductility spectra & they can be plotted in tripartite plot. Yield strength of the E-P System.
Yield strength for a specified is difficult to obtain; but reverse is possible by interpolation technique.
YYY AVD ,,nT
Inelastic response spectra
2y y y n y y n yD =x V =ω x A =ω x ( 6.39)
y yf =mA ( 6.40)
6/8
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
For a given set of & , obtain response for E-P system for a number of .
Each solution will give a ; , is maximum displacement of elastic system.
From the set of & , find the desired & corresponding .
Using value, find for the E-P system.
Through iterative process the desired and are obtained .
nT Yf
oo xKf ox
f Yf
Contd..
Yf
Yf
6/9
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Contd.. For different values of , the process is repeated to obtain the ductility spectrum.
nT
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 30
0.2
1
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.5
24
8
(sec)nT
f y/w
=A y
/g
Fig. 6.25
6/10
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
From the ductility spectrum, yield strength to limit for a given set of & can be obtained.
Peak deformation .
nT
2m Y Y nx =μx =μA ω
1
f nT
Contd..
0.01 0.050.1 0.5 1 5 10 50 1000.05
0.1
0.5
1
Ta=0
.035
Tf=1
5
T b=0
.125
Tc=0
.5
T d=3
Te=1
0
fy
20
1
5
10
2
Tn (sec)
Ry
0.12
0.195
0.37
8
4
2
1.5
0.0
If spectrum for is known ,it is possible to plot vs. for different values of .
The plot is shown in Fig. 6.26.
Fig. 6.26
6/11
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Above plot for a number of earthquakes are used to obtain idealized forms of & . f nT
Contd..
1 T <Tn a-1/2f = ( 2μ-1) T <T <T ( 6.41)y n cb
-1μ T >Tn c
0.01 0.050.1 0.5 1 5 10 50 1000.05
0.1
0.5
1
Ta=1
/33
T f=3
3
T b= =1 1/ /8 2
T c Te=1
0
fy
Tn (sec)
8
4
2
0.2
1
Tc'
1.5
Fig. 6.27
7/1
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Construction of the spectra
As , idealized inelastic design spectrum for a particular can be constructed from elastic design spectrum.
Inelastic spectra of many earthquakes when smoothed compare well with that obtained as above.
Construction of the spectrum follows the steps below :
Divide constant A-ordinates of segment by to obtain .
YfYR 1
cb 12 YR '' cb
7/2
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Similarly, divide V ord inates of segments by ; to get ; D ordina- tes of segments by to get ; ordinate by to get .
Join & ; draw for ; take as the same ; join . Draw for .
)( dc YR
'' dc )( ed
YR '' ed f
'f
'f
'egoY xD sTn 33'a
a ''&bagoY xA sTn 33
1
Contd..
Natural vibration period Tn (sec) (log
scale)
goV
Ta =1/33 sec Tf =33 secTb =1/8 sec Te =10 sec
aa'
b
b'
c
c'
d
d' e
e'f
f '
Elastic designspectrum
Inelastic designspectrum
Pse
ud
o-ve
loci
ty V
or
Vy
(log
sca
le)
/V
A=xgo
A= A
xgo
D=xgo
D/µ
D/µ
D=x
go
A/v2µ
-1
V
D
x.
Illustration of the Method
Fig. 6.28
7/3
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Example 6.7 : Construct inelastic design spectrum from the elastic spectrum given in Fig 2.22.
The inelastic design spectrum is drawn & shown in Fig 6.28b.
2
Contd..
Inelastic design spectrum for = 2 Fig. 6.28b
0.01 0.02 0.05 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.5 0.7 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 10 20 30 50 70 100
0.001
0.002
0.003 0.004 0.005 0.007 0.01
0.02
0.03 0.04 0.05 0.07 0.1
0.2
0.3 0.4 0.5 0.7
1
2
3 4 5 7
10
aTbT eT fTcT dT
Time period (sec)
Pseu
do v
eloc
ity(m
/sec
)
Elastic design spectrum
Inelastic design
spectrum
(b)
7/4
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Ductility in multi-storey frames For an SDOF, inelastic spectrum can provide design yield strength for a given ; maximum displacement under earthquake is found as For multi-storey building , it is not possible because
It is difficult to obtain design yield strength of all members for a uniform . Ductility demands imposed by earthquake on members widely differ.
Some studies on multi - storey frames are summarized here to show how ductility demands vary from member to member when designed using elastic spectrum for uniform .
yx
7/5
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Shear frames are designed following seismic coefficient method ; is obtained using inelastic spectrum of El centro earthquake for a specified ductility & storey shears are distributed as per code.
Frames are analysed assuming E-P behaviour of columns for El centro earthquake.
The storey stiffness is determined using seismic coefficient method by assuming storey drifts to be equal.
BYV
Contd.. 7/6
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis
Results show that
For taller frames, are larger in upper & lower stories; decrease in middle storeys.
Deviation of storey ductility demands from the design one increases for taller frames.
In general demand is maximum at the first storey & could be 2-3 times the design
Study shows that increase of base shear by some percentage tends to keep the demand within a stipulated limit.
Contd..
7/7
T.K. Datta Department Of Civil Engineering, IIT Delhi
Response Spectrum Method Of Analysis