Sanchez vs CAFacts:Lilia Sanchez, petitioner, constructed a house on a 76-square meter lot owned by her parents-in-law. The lot was reisteredunder T!T "o. #6$6#% with the &ollowin co-owners: 'liseo Sanchez married to !elia Sanchez, (arilyn Sanchez married to"icanor (ontalban, Lilian Sanchez, widow, "enita Sanchez, sinle, Susana Sanchez married to Fernando )amos, and FelipeSanchez.*+, -n #. February +//0, the lot was reistered under T!T "o. #1/#+6 in the name o& pri2ate respondent 3irinia Teriaby2irtueo& a4eedo&5bsoluteSalesupposedtoha2ebeene6ecutedon#$7une+//0*#, byall si6869co-ownersinher&a2or. :etitioner claimed that she did not a&&i6 her sinature on the document and subsequently re&used to 2acate the lot, thuspromptin pri2ate respondent 3irinia Teria to &ile an action &or reco2ery o& possession o& the a&oresaid lot with the (etropolitanTrial !ourt 8(eT!9 o& !aloocan !ity sometime in September +//0, subsequently ra&&led to ;r. %/ o& that court.