1
Safe and Affordable Urban Housing in Bangladesh Promoting better building techniques in Dinajpur Town – a Case Study
2
Safe and Affordable Housing in Bangladesh
Disseminating better building techniques
Team:
John Arnold
Azit Roy
Marianne Keating
Sam Stephens
Shareq Rauf Chowdhury
Poramol Roy
Pulin Roy
With thanks to:
Apu Chandra Roy
Imran Morshed Khazi
Ishita Alam Abonee Ishita Mouri Rahman
Khaled A Sheikh
Mahmuda Alam
Orko Jahanjir
Rubiyat-ur-Rahman
Showeb Al-Kadri
Tushar Kanti Roy
Uzzal Roy
With support from:
Simple Action For the Environment (SAFE) safebangladesh.wordpress.com
Housing and Hazards www.housingandhazards.org
Australian High Commission
British Women’s Association (Dhaka)
Urban Partnerships for Poverty Reduction (UPPR)
3
Contents
Contents .......................................................................................................................................................... 3
Executive Summary ......................................................................................................................................... 4
Introduction .................................................................................................................................................... 5
The place and people ...................................................................................................................................... 8
Participatory Design and Construction – the process ................................................................................... 13
12. Recommended construction improvements .................................................................................... 16
Adaptable house designs for Jorgen Babur Mart ......................................................................................... 23
Costs .............................................................................................................................................................. 26
Key Issues, Chellenges and Next Steps ......................................................................................................... 27
List of Appendices ......................................................................................................................................... 30
4
Executive Summary
This report details a pilot project to design and build 10 safe and affordable homes in a slum area in Dinajpur
town, in the north east of Bangladesh. A multidisciplinary team of architects, engineers and a local NGO (SAFE)
worked with a slum community to identify and demonstrate improved construction techniques using traditional
materials. The principle behind these improvements is that they remain affordable but produce a house which is
more liveable, safer and ultimately lasts longer – saving households money in the longer term and leaving them
less vulnerable to disaster.
The aim of this project was to demonstrate these improvements in such a way that they would be replicated by
the local community after the project was finished. To this end a participatory process involving local families
was used during the design and construction so that improvements would be appropriate and understood by all.
Although it is too early to see if techniques have been fully accepted and replicated, the participatory process was
successful and a strong relationship formed between the NGO and the community. This helped the construction
work go smoothly with few delays. The 10 demonstration houses and input from the NGO were almost fully
subsidized, but with labour and in some cases financial contributions from the households. Even at this early
stage, it is clear that households are taking pride in their new homes, carrying out regular maintenance and
contributing to a local savings scheme dedicated for future maintenance.
Different contexts (i.e land values, environmental conditions, resources available) will require different housing
solutions, and any significant investment in housing will require some degree of secure land tenure. This project
focuses on low-cost low-rise, typically self-built housing that would be appropriate for households with limited
resources, or/and a limited security of tenure (eg.10 year lease or ‘right to stay’).
Supporting households in self-built housing offers an opportunity to rapidly increase the supply of safe low-
income housing in Bangladesh. This project demonstrates an approach that supports this mode of construction to
produce safer and more economical houses in the longer term. Key to the project is not just the technical
elements but its participatory nature, designed to transfer skills and understanding to the local community so
that the ideas might be replicated in the future.
5
Introduction
Urbanisation - an opportunity
Urban populations in Bangladesh have seen huge growth since the country’s independence in 1971.
Approximately 40 million (25% of the population) people now live in towns or cities compared with
8% at independence1. Dhaka, the capital, has approximately 16 million inhabitants and is the 9th
largest and one of the fastest growing cities in the world.
Much of this urban migration can be attributed to economic opportunities. Urban populations now
contribute to over 70% of the national GDP. Managed well, towns and cities can be drivers of
economic growth, and can be seen as Bangladesh’s best opportunity of reducing poverty2.
Unfortunately Bangladesh’s towns and cities are ill equipped to manage this growth, which places
huge demands on space and infrastructure. Scarcity of land, poor transport, lack of planning and lack
of affordable credit often makes it difficult for people, especially lower income groups, to find
suitable housing convenient to their place of work. The result has been a huge increase in the
numbers of slums – areas of housing characterised by lack of secure land tenure, lack of formal
services like water or electricity and cramped, insanitary conditions.
Project scope
Different contexts will require different housing solutions: a site in Dhaka where land values are high
may preclude anything but multi-storey development in order to keep unit costs down; a household
owning land maybe willing to invest in more permanent housing than a household with informal
rights; a household who are not saving, or planning for the future beyond the current year are
unlikely to be ready to invest in their own housing at all, preferring perhaps to rent.
This project focuses on low-cost low-rise, typically self-built housing that would be appropriate for
households with limited resources, or/and a limited security of tenure (eg.10 year lease or ‘right to
stay’).
1 Islam, Nazrul and Salma A. Shafi (2008) “A Proposal for a Housing Development Programme in Dhaka City,” Centre for Urban Studies (CUS), Dhaka. 2 World Bank (2007) ”Bangladesh: Strategy for Sustained Growth”. Bangladesh Development Series, Paper no. 18. Dhaka, Bangladesh.
Aerial view of Jorgen Babur Mart
6
Self-built housing – an opportunity
Self built housing is the prevalent mode of construction among low income groups in Bangladesh.
Self-built, in this context, means that the homeowner is closely involved with every aspect of
construction. For a household with limited resources it offers the most economical approach:
improvements can be carried out incrementally as resources become available or as need requires
(eg. adding an extra room for a newly married son). Self-construction is not usually guided by any
safety standards, but by word of mouth and informal knowledge, and can often lead to hap-hazard
buildings which are vulnerable to hazards such as earthquakes or storms. However self-construction,
if properly supported, presents an opportunity to increase the supply of affordable homes which are
safer and longer-lasting.
The issues of securing tenure and access to finance –of which both have a huge affect on the type of
housing options available are beyond the scope of this project.
Communicating improved self-built construction
There are many issues and constraints which will influence a project aimed at improving self-built
construction practices. Important factors that should be considered include:
`Opportunity cost of households time. Time is money, especially in slums. Households may not be
able to afford time to participate and so those households who spent significant time attending
workshops during the planning stages were compensated. Other workshops and events were
held on Fridays when residents were not working.
Security of tenure. If there is a threat of eviction then households are unlikely to want to invest
money in their home. The families involved in this project held ‘right to stay’ documentation
from the local government, and had been settled for many years without threat of eviction.
No extra cash. Resources are scarce, and when they are available households have to balance
many competing demands for their use. To invest in housing, households must be thinking and
planning several years ahead and saving accordingly.
Benefits of improved housing may seem marginal. In the face of many (more immediate) risks,
the threat of a risk such as a storm, and its potential impact on health, livelihood etc may seem
too far off to justify importance.
Further to these, any improvements in construction are more likely to be replicated if they are: A workshop with local community to explain the techniques being used in the
construction of the new houses.
7
Desirable. One of the main challenges to this project is that traditional materials, such as
bamboo and mud are often associated with poverty/low status.
Simple and affordable
Available locally. includes not just materials but also skilled labour within local communities.
Their benefits are fully understood. For example, if a household is going to pay extra money for
treated bamboo they must be aware of the payback period.
To address these issues fully – to understand what people have and what they want, to share ideas
and to have them understood - a participatory approach which builds trust between all parties
provides many advantages. The participatory process we have followed in this project is outlined in
later chapter ‘Participatory Design and Construction – the process’. An important component of the
process is that learning is transferred to the local community and builders through doing practical
work – building demonstration houses or through practical workshops, considered much more
effective and appropriate means of teaching in this context.3
3 ‘Learning by doing’ –Ian Davis, (1996), Shelter After Disaster
An initial meeting between SAFE and community members
8
The place and people
Jorgen Babu Mart is an area situated approximately 2km from the centre of Dinajpur town. Originally
the land belonged to Jorgen Babu, a Hindu land owner who emigrated to India during the partition of
India and the former East Pakistan. The government is now the de-facto owner of the land.
Households do not possess individual title deeds but many do have ‘right to stay’ documents from
the local government. The area has been established for many years and with threat of eviction low
many households have invested in pucca (permanent) housing.
This project has focussed on one section of Jorgen Babur Mart inhabited by approximately 50
families. The land they occupy was once waterlogged and uninhabitable but was reclaimed
approximately 7 years ago by the NGO CARE. Many of the families were previously squatting on land
belonging to Bangladesh Railways.
The people who make up this area of Jorgen Babur Mart are both Hindu and Muslim. They have come
from different parts of the NW of Banlgadesh and many for economic reasons. They are involved in
occupations ranging from TV-repair men to day labourers to rickshaw pullers and earn between
Tk.100-250 per day. Although some women work outside the area, most stay at home but generate
extra income through home-based activities such as poppadom rolling or handicraft production. In a
survey of 30 of these families over half had existing micro-loans and a similar number also held small
savings with 1 of 3 organisations. Detailed interviews of 10 households are given in appendix G.
DINAJPUR
9
Nurul Islam
Nurul lives in a small single room house with his wife Hasina and his two youngest children Hasan and Sumi. They moved
to Jorgen Babur Mart in 2001 with help from NGO CARE after being evicted from there previous house in a nearby slum.
He did not start life out in Dinajpur, but was born in Dhan Ghora, a
village near Rangpur about 60km to the west. He lost both parents
within the first year of his life – his father died before he was 2
months old and his mother suffered from mental illness and
disappeared. He was taken in by his grandmother who looked
after him throughout his childhood. In 1974 when Nurul was
about 11, Bangladesh suffered severe famines under the new
government formed after independence with Pakistan. Nurul
came to Dinajpur with his grandmother in search of work and
food. They settled in a slum area called Sheshshahir Moor Bosti
where he remained until the slum was cleared in 2001.
During that time Nurul marries Hasina, they have 3 children and
he has a variety of jobs including cart puller and lorry driver’s
assistant. It is during this last job that Nurul suffers a severe
accident which affects his back and leaves him unable to walk for
3 years – relying on help from his family to move him around.
With no savings, he is unable to get any professional medical help
and Hasina starts working full time as a day labourer to
compensate. With the help of pain killers and a bamboo brace, he
slowly regains strength and starts to walk and work again.
With his back partially recovered things are better. He now works
as a rickshaw peddler earning Tk150-200 per day, though can
only manage about 3 days a week due to back pain. His wife
works as a house builder, often 7 days a week when there is work.
They save Tk10 a week as part of an NGO savings scheme but
currently only have Tk400. Their daughter, Sumi, age 9, attends a
nearby BRAC school in the afternoons. When she grows up she
wants to be a teacher. Hasan, 7, doesn’t like going to school and
often truants despite being taken there by his mother before she starts work. He is falling way behind and his mother is
worried that he will drop out completely. She tells us with an exasperated look how he recently sold his books in exchange
for some peanuts.
Their house is not the best – small at 9ft x 18ft, in poor condition and located next to the communal toilets. Despite that he
is proud and happy to have his own land without the threat of eviction. Owing to the poor condition of his home, Nurul’s
home was chosen by the community to be the first demonstration house to be built.
Nurul and family outside their home in Jorgen Babur Mart
Shahin Islam in his bedroom and study he shares with his brother. There are
no windows.
10
Physical environment
Housing in this area is linear with plots laid out on two sides of a single narrow lane. On either side of
the lane behind the plots run two surface drains. Communal toilets have been built in the centre of
the area. This infrastructure was provided by INGO CARE when the land was reclaimed, but is in
poor condition with no structures set up to take responsibility for maintenance.
Plot sizes vary between 8ft x 18ft up to 30ft x 18ft and are often divided up into several small rooms
to cater for 3 generations of the same family. The houses area simply constructed with a bamboo
frame, lean-to roofs of Corrugated Iron (CI) sheet and wall materials of either CI sheet or bamboo
mat. Several houses have private tube wells and 2 houses have private latrines constructed in
partnership with the Urban Partnerships for Poverty Reduction project. A formal electric connection
exists to the area with many households connected. A few trees exist within the plots though there is
little greenery and no households grow any vegetables.
Plan of existing house for 8 family members
Plan of existing house for 8 family members Plan of existing house for 8 family members
A typical cross-section of existing housing – see plan overleaf
11
Existing Problems and Opportunities
All houses lack adequate ventilation with very few windows or gaps to allow natural ventilation.
As a consequence many households use electric lights and fans during the daytime.
The CI sheet used for roofs and walls provides very poor insulation and rooms are stiflingly hot
during the day and cold during the winter.
The drainage of the whole area is poor and all houses are regularly flooded during the monsoon
season. This is compounded by the poor maintenance of the existing surface drains.
Most households cook on small portable clay stoves, and burn locally purchased wood. Without
adequate ventilation many women prefer to cook outside, however when it is raining the
resulting smoke inside the houses is a problem.
With up to 3 generations sharing a small plot, space is a real issue. A husband, wife and
children will often sharing a room as small as 11’ x 9’. As a consequence and owing to the heat
many women who roll and dry poppadoms prefer to do so in the congested and dirty lane
outside.
Existing settlement pattern. Households involved in construction are highlighted.
Drains running behind houses are not regularly maintained and flood
intermittently during the rainy season.
12
The bamboo used in construction rots quickly in the ground and is subject to attack from insects
above. Posts need to be replaced every 1-2 years but are often left leaving houses weak.
With many families living in the area for a long time there is a strong sense of community
Drains and toilets exist, but just needs to be properly maintained.
Strong winds do occasionally affect the region however they are of a much smaller scale that
the cyclones affecting the south of Bangladesh. The area is not exposed.
13
Participatory Design and Construction – the process
The design process has been undertaken in conjunction with the community and local builders. This
is important to ensure that our design matches the requirements of the households, and is specific to
Jorgen Babur Mart – using available materials and addressing the issues specific to this place.
The process is designed to build trust between all parties and to ensure that all households and
builders understand the improved techniques we are promoting.
The process we have undertaken for this project is as follows:
1. Initial meetings. Primarily with the Community Based Organisation and then the whole
community to explain the project.
2. Study. This involved short survey of approx. 30 households within community including
identifying existing house types and construction techniques; identification of local builders,
available materials, and; mapping of the community.
3. Selection of 10 households. Households were chosen by the community based on need, and
verified by our own surveys. The chosen households were announced by the CBO at a
community meeting.
4. Dream house workshop. A 1 day workshop attended by the 10 households, CBO members and
facilitated by the SAFE team and architecture students from BRAC University. Each
household was given materials and asked to build their dream house – the only constraints
being that it must be on their existing land. This helped us to understand what people wanted
in terms of their space requirements. Ideas which came out of this workshop included an
area for growing vegetables, extra flexible space - for guests, for children to play and for
income generating activities like drying poppadoms. To get this extra space many households
built 2 storey houses. At the end of this workshop the group decided on who would build the
first house.
5. Initial design. Appropriate improvements were selected by the design team and design
options worked up. A tentative budget of US$500 for construction was developed.
6. Design workshop. A 3 day workshop attended by local house builders, households, CBO
members and facilitated again by the SAFE team and architecture students from BRAC
University. Participants present their dream houses
14
The first part of the workshop was used to show people improved building techniques as
practiced by SAFE. This included a practical demonstration of a low cost method of treating
bamboo. A local song team attended and sang songs which reinforced these messages.
The second part focussed on developing initial designs. Working in mixed groups – builders,
household members and architecture students, models were built of two different designs
which incorporated the improvements discussed on the first day of the workshop. Next the
groups worked out the costs of each house. These came out higher than the tentative budget
set previously and the groups were encouraged to find ways of reducing costs, whilst
maintaining the agreed improvements. These included recycling materials from their old
houses, reducing optional extras like expensive window and door frames, households adding
their own money and/or undertaking more of the labour themselves. At the end of the
workshop a timeframe for construction of the first house was agreed. See Appendix H for a
detailed programme from this workshop. The workshop programme is detailed in Appendix
H.
7. Detailed design and costing. Two generic designs were developed and costed by SAFE and
BRAC architecture students. The full costing which has been developed further during
construction phase, is given in Appendix C.
8. Construction of first demonstration house. Although the costs for the basic house were met be
met by the project, responsibilities were agreed between SAFE and participants: households
were be responsible for dismantling houses, keeping site clean, providing 2 people daily for
labour during construction and carrying materials to site – this was recorded clearly in an
informal written contract between SAFE and the household. The first house provided an
opportunity to review the design and construction as people at full-scale.
9. Regular workshops. As the construction progressed a further 6 practical workshops were
carried out. These workshops further reinforced understanding about the house design and
construction techniques. To try and spread the word, different participants were invited –
other households from the same area, and builders and other community leaders from
surrounding slums.
10. Construction of remaining 9 houses. Following a review of the first house, and with
improvements taken on board for the remaining houses, a timeframe for the construction of the
remaining houses was agreed and construction commenced. Houses were built incrementally
BRAC architecture students, builders and household work on
the design during the workshops
15
with up to 3 (connected row) houses at a time. Construction of 1 house with approx 4no.
builders took on average 3-4 weeks. As the construction continued, leaders emerged from the
building team and more responsibility was placed on the builders and households with SAFE
taking a more ‘hands off’ role.Local play or ‘jattra’. An evenings’ programme of events was
organised to further promote the project within the immediate community. This including
performances from a local song team, and a short play acted by the local builders and
participating households. The play and many of the songs reinforce the safer building
techniques of the project.
11. Promotional leaflets. Instructional leaflets were produced in Bangla giving further information
on cross-bracing techniques and distributed amongst residents of Jorgen Babur Mart. See
appendix C.
12. Savings group for maintenance. Although these houses may require less maintenance that traditional
techniques, regular maintenance is still essential if the houses are to remain strong and safe in the
longer term. The 10 households were encouraged to start a savings group. A small weekly amount is
deposited with the savings groups leader and this money could be used when repairs were needed.
Local community members learn about cross-bracing and cement stabilisation of earth during practical workshops
Local builders promote the project in a jattra (local play)
16
Recommended construction improvements
Rather than produce a single design to be indiscriminately copied SAFE recommends a range of
design improvement options. These are modest technological changes that will increase the
performance of existing housing types by strengthening or improving parts which are particularly
weak or vulnerable to the local climate. This will save households money in the long run through
increased longevity of materials while making them less vulnerable to hazards such as floods or
strong winds.
These improved building techniques use available materials and are low cost – scaled to the actual
costs that low income households invest in housing. We aim for these improvements to increase total
costs of building by only 20%. Techniques are based on practical experience from SAFE’s team and
existing best practice on the subject4,5,6. Techniques are context specific but would be applicable in
many locations throughout Bangladesh.
This approach is adaptable. It acknowledges that no two houses are the same – different people have
different aspirations, family sizes, occupations and budgets, and as such will need different houses.
1. Plinth Stabilisation and preparation.
Flood water and rain causes cracking and damage to mud plinths. They require regular
maintenance and obtaining this mud from local sources can be problematic. When flood water
enters the house floors become muddy and create a poor environment.
Stabilising the plinth with a small amount of cement has been found to substantially increase its
resistance to dampness and erosion by water, preventing the need for regular maintenance. The
entire plinth does not need to be stabilised - only a capping layer of approximately 3 – 6in. Prior
to this the plinth should be constructed in compacted layers of regular soil. The plinth should
have a minimum slope of 1% for drainage.
Cement stabilisation is suitable for soil that has a low clay content. Soil with more than 10% clay
content may need to be modified by the addition of sand.
4 Iftekar, K.A. (2005) Handbook on Design and Construction of Housing for Flood-Prone Rural Areas of Bangladesh, ADPC. Available at www.sheltercentre.org 5 Mallick, F.H. et al.(2008) Improved design and construction of rural housing in Noakhali, IUCN. 6 Chisholm, M.P. (1979) A study of the provision of rural housing in Bangladesh. BArch thesis, vols. I & II. University of Newcastle upon Tyne, UK.
Plinth capping with cement stabilised mud – taken from Handbook on Design
and Construction of Housing for Flood-Prone Rural Areas
17
2. ‘Kaatla’ or concrete stump
When in contact with the ground bamboo posts rot quickly in as little as 1 year. The use of a
concrete stump ensures that the bamboo is raised above the ground level. A good connection
between the kaatla and the bamboo is required. For the two storey buildings constructed in this
project we recommend a slightly larger kaatla than shown adjacent in order to resist uplift from
the wind – see drwg MCL100-005 in Appendix B.
3. Bamboo treatment
Untreated bamboo will be attacked by insects and a life-span of approximately 4-6 years can be
expected. Treated bamboo should last 15–20 years if it is kept protected from the elements.
A cost effective way of treating bamboo, undertaken previously by SAFE, uses a solution of
borax, boric acid and water. This solution penetrates the bamboo easily, reducing the level of
sap in the bamboo and making it less likely to be damaged by insects. The method used here is
known as the Vertical Soak Diffusion technique7: the bamboo is stacked vertically and the
solution is poured inside from the top end (prior to this a hole was made in each diaphragm
using a long metal rod, hammered into one end; the last diaphragm being left so that water
7 Vertical Soak Diffusion for Bamboo Preservation, Environmental Bamboo Foundation, 2003. www.bamboocentral.org
Bamboo treatment with borax/boric acid solution
Above: Kaatla or concrete posts; left: bamboo treatment using vertical soak
method
18
would be contained within the bamboo). This method increases the cost of the bamboo by
approx. 20%.
4. Cross bracing
Cross bracing and plan bracing are essential to increase stability in high winds. Currently very
few houses use cross bracing. The location of the cross bracing and the connection between to
the frame is important to ensure that it functions correctly. As part of this project, field testing
was undertaken to determine the strength of these bolted connections, and simple guidelines in
English and Bangla produced to ensure correct installation of cross bracing. These can be found
in Appendices D & E. The position of cross bracing is also detailed in the design drawings in
Appendix B.
Plan bracing
Cross bracing
> 50mm/ 2”
Cross bracing fixing detail. Fixing no less than 50mm from end of culm with a
node between the fixing and the end. Refer to Appendix E.
19
5. Stronger joints
Existing practice is to use jute string (natural and degrades quickly) or nails (which can cause
culm to split). It is essential that good connections are made between the foundations, walls and
roof to ensure that the structure is not damaged during strong winds. Bolted connections were
used where stronger connections were required - between wall posts and foundations and first
floor joists and for cross bracing. Bamboo nails and nylon string were used in other locations.
20
6. Wall materials
Different wall materials depending on the location:
Wattle and daub type. Mud stabilised with cement is applied to a bamboo lattice approx
1-2” thick. This type of wall requires regular maintenance if exposed to rain and so is
best suited to walls protected by a roof overhang. The mud provides better insulation
than materials such as CI sheets or bamboo mat.
CI sheet/bamboo mat. CI sheet is placed on the lower part of the wall where it is more
likely to get wet and with bamboo matting above. This reduces costs while maintaining
the longevity of the wall.
7. Stronger roof structure
Improvements to the existing construction were used which will make the roof structure more
resistant to strong winds:
Roof form pitched with a slope between 30-40 degrees where possible.
Overhangs should be 2ft 6in to provide protection from rain whilst resisting uplift by
wind.
Strong connections should be made between the roof structure and the walls using nylon
string and bamboo nails as shown in (5).
CI sheets should be fixed at every 3 corrugations with twisted roofing nails and at every
2 corrugations along edges.
CI sheet should be of minimum gauge 0.35mm. Thinner CI sheet is widely used but is less
cost effective due to its shorter life span.
Cement stabilised ‘wattle and daub’ wall
Extra fixings at the bottom of the sheet
CI sheet at the bottom of the wall where subject to
splash back from rain improves longevity
21
8. Ventilation, insulation and lighting
Adequately sized, lockable windows were included. Windows were constructed with
timber frames and bamboo slats. Refer to Appendix A for more pictures of the completed
houses.
Bamboo louvers at the top of walls were used to increase the amount of airflow, however
these were omitted in later houses due to cold drafts in the winter months.
A trial ‘solar bottle bulb’ was installed in the roof of one house as well as clear plastic
roof sheet. A report on the installation and costs of these is given in Appendix F.
Flat ceilings of bamboo mat were installed underneath the roof, to provide a degree of
protection from the heat transmitted through the roof sheets.
For the two storey houses the first floor was made using a bamboo joists and slats, with
a 1” layer of cement stabilised mud. This mud layers provides a degree of insulation to
the room below.
Louvers at the top of the wall for improved ventilation
Solar light bottle bulb Windows improve ventilation and lighting
22
9. Kitchen garden and planting
The growing of vegetables offers an opportunity for households to save money and eat a more
nutritious diet, while improving their immediate environment. Vegetation and planting were
encouraged through:
Promotion at workshops, where pictures of ‘good practice’ from other slums were shown.
The houses were designed with space at front and back to allow for planting.
Frames were provided to encourage climbing plants.
A competition was held where prizes were given to households who had done the best planting.
10. Improved cook stove
GIZ’s (German govt.s development organisation) improved cook stove or ‘bondo chula’ is
available locally. When maintained and used properly it will reduce fuel consumption by up to
40% from a traditional stove. It would be installed with an exhaust flue to remove smoke from
the kitchen area. Where budget permited, households installed improved cook stoves.
23
Adaptable house designs for Jorgen Babur Mart
Although all the houses are slightly different, owing to households’ needs and space constraints, they
were based on 2 generic designs for a single storey and two storey (ground+1) building. Photos of
the houses are given in appendix A. Architectural and structural design drawings for these houses
are found in appendix B.
Structural calculations were undertaken for the two storey house to ensure the house would resist
strong winds. Calculations were made using the Indian Design Code IS85:1987 and a design wind
speed of 139km/h. Using this wind force and the dimensions of the house, forces acting on the cross-
bracing were discerned. Practical testing of the bamboo cross-bracing connections was undertaken
to ascertain their ability to withstand the expected forces and is shown in Appendix D. A 100kPa
allowable soil bearing pressure was used to size foundations to resist forces arising from gravity
loading as well as overturning due to wind. By inspection, wind-force design will be sufficient to
account for expected earthquake forces.
The features of the design which offer significant improvement from existing practice are as follows:
Single storey design (refer to Appendices A & B for further photos and architectural and
structural sketches)
The design features of this house, other than the improvement mentioned above are as follows:
One storey house as per the space requirements
2 ft. recess from the narrow lane has been provided at the front to allow space for growing
vegetables and plants
Space has been allowed for the later provision of a tube well and latrine.
Kitchen at the rear allows easy access to drain and proposed tube well.
Retractable door at the front to allow overnight storage of rickshaw.
Louvers to allow improved ventilation and access for drying popadoms on roof.
Wide door allows overnight storage of rickshaw
24
Two storey row house (refer to Appendices A & B for photos and architectural and structural
sketches)
The design features of this house, other than the improvements mentioned above are as follows:
Two storey house so that family has extra space
Veranda on 1st floor overlooking street to provides utility space for activities such as drying
clothes and rolling popodoms, whilst allowing users to socially interact with neighbours.
Shared wall between adjoining properties, which saved costs. A written agreement between
the neighbours to clarify responsibilities for maintenance was drawn up.
2 ft. Set back from the lane has been provided at the front to allow space for growing
vegetables and plants. Space also provided at the rear for the same.
Space has been allowed for the later provision of a latrine towards the rear.
Kitchen at the rear allows easy access to drain and proposed tube well.
Pitched roof provided more strength in high winds.
Balcony
Discussing the design of the first house with the household and builders
25
26
Costs
A detailed cost breakdown for each house type is given in appendix C. The costs for materials and
labour (excluding the costs for design, workshops and other costs for SAFE to manage etc) are as
follows:
Single storey house (Nurul’s)
Total floor area – 256 sqft
Total cost – Tk 41,728 ($ 521)
Total cost per sqft – 160Tk/sqft ($2)
Two-storey house (Rubi)
Total floor area – 284 sqft
Total cost – Tk 39,597 ($495)
Total cost per sqft – 139Tk/sqft ($1.74)
The relative difference between the two designs can be explained by the significant cost of the metal
roofing sheets. The 2-storey house has a smaller footprint than the single storey house and therefore
required less roofing sheets.
27
Key Issues, Chellenges and Next Steps
Take up by other households
At the time of writing only 5 months had passed since the final house was completed. This is too
early to assess whether improved techniques are being copied in the wider community and a further
assessment will be required at the end of the following construction season (June 2013).
One barrier to this will be the social stigma attached with traditional materials such as bamboo and
mud - associated with poverty and low social status. The aspiration of most households is to own a
brick or ‘pukka’ house. It is hoped that because the houses look distinctive, that they combine new
ideas with traditional materials, and ultimately because they are significantly cheaper than brick
houses that this may be overcome.
Another barrier is that the total cost of the houses still far exceeds what many people could afford
through their own savings. Many of the improvements used in this project can be implemented
incrementally, reducing the need to make a large one off investment. However it is important to note
that savings programmes and access to affordable credit for housing construction are key to enable
poor households to improve their housing. Linking the provision of credit with improved self-build
construction has been trialled with some degree of success in Delhi by Micro Home Solutions8
Participatory design and construction
At this stage it may be too early to tell whether the participatory process has successfully passed on
information to the wider community. However the participatory approach helped to make the
construction phase run smoothly. Working in such a small area with poor access and shared with
many other families it was important to have the full cooperation and trust of the community to
ensure there were no delays. Also even at this early stage, households are taking pride in their new
homes, carrying out regular maintenance and contributing to a local savings scheme dedicated for
future maintenance.
During the construction it was planned that more control would be handed over to local builders and
households, especially with regard to finance. Although households were involved to some degree in
the purchasing of materials, most of the financial planning and accounting was done by the SAFE. In
8 Micro Home Solutions (2011), Self Construction: enabling safe and affordable housing, available at www.microhomesolutions.org
28
reality for this to happen the money needs to be in the hands of the household – either in the form of
their own funds, or perhaps given by the NGO at staggered intervals during construction (eg. After
successful completion of the foundations, money is given for the walls).
Scaling up
In this project the costs the houses were fully subsidized. It is likely that subsidies will always be
required to demonstrate and promote new techniques such as these, but it is hoped that households
could meet more of the costs as SAFE has done in its rural programmes. Again, the presence of
savings and affordable credit amongst the community would be important here.
Below is an outline framework for the participatory approach used here (detailed more in the
previous chapter ‘Participatory Design and Construction – the process’). With the training of
community level building specialists at its core, it is a model which could be replicated at scale across
many communities in Bangladesh, given some security of tenure and access to savings or affordable
credit.
Steps Objectives Activities
1. Initial study Familiarisation with locality and it’s problems;
Develop potential design improvement options;
Build relationship with community;
Survey
Documentation of settlement patterns, existing house typologies, costs of construction and impact of disaster on households.
Focus group discussions;
2. Design To decide on design improvement options appropriate to place;
To agree improvement options with local builders and households;
Design workshop involving participating households, local builders;
Focus group discussions;
Build models with the community
3. Design and Implementation
To demonstrate design improvements;
To train local builders and households in these new techniques;
Construction of one demonstration house using design improvement options.
Mini-workshops to train builders and households about improved construction techniques.
Ensure participation by the household including decision making and contribution of labour and available resources;
Review and make changes to design improvements where required.
4. Transition/Exit To make local people independent from external consultants; Construction and/or strengthening of 5-10 houses, replicating activities from step (3);
29
strategy SAFE team to take a more ‘hands-off’ role with responsibility for construction quality, costs and programme transferred to builders and households.
Undertake more workshops to disseminate within wider community and other poor communities in local area.
Promotional activities: produce leaflets & other media such as local play; provide limited no. of small subsidies for using new techniques – giving more exposure within the community.
Link other poor communities in the town. Involve them in workshops, try and create links between community leaders.
List of Appendices
Appendix A - p31
A selection of photos of the houses during and after construction
Appendix B - p36
Key plan of location of houses and house owners
Sketch of cross section of Rubi & Shabitribala’s house looking east.
Sketch of typical single storey house
Structural drawings for typical 2-storey house
Appendix C - p48
Cost budget for single storey house
Breakdown of costs for 2-storey house (Rubi and Fahima’s)
Appendix D - p52
Field tests of bolted bamboo connections
Appendix E - p68
Simple guidelines for cross-bracing - leaflet
Appendix F - p73
Solar light bulb installation report
Appendix G - p79
Location key plan of households & interview of household
Appendix H - p89
3-day design workshop programme
Appendix A
A selection of photos of the houses during and after construction
Appendix B
Key plan of location of houses and house owners
Sketch of cross section of Rubi & Shabitribala’s house looking east.
Sketch of typical single storey house
Structural drawings for typical 2-storey house
Appendix C
Cost budget for single storey house
Breakdown of costs for 2-storey house (Rubi and Fahima’s)
Cost budget breakdown for typical single storey house rev 2 06.07.11
NotesThese figures are budget costs only and based on outline design for single‐storey house shown in Appendix BLabour is assumed at 200Tk/dayHousehold is assumed to provide 2 labourers throughout constructionCost does not include extra cost of SAFE supervision, training or transport costsLabour costs given are minimum ‐ the first 2‐3 houses will require approx. 50% more labour as builders are learning new techniques and designCI sheet = Corrugated Iron SheetAssume recycled Corrugated Iron (CI) sheet 270 sqft Total floor area 256 sq.ftImproved cook stove not included in price
Quantity UnitMaterial Cost (Tk)
Labour Cost (Tk)
Total cost (tk)
1 PlinthPlinth volume = 1' x 266 256 cuftAssume compaction ration of 0.75Total volume of earth required 341 cuftVolume of 1 trolley 90 cuftTotal no. trolleys required, say 4Cost of 1 trolley of earth 500 TkTotal cost of earth for plinth 2000Labour for carrying and placing earth 400
Sub‐total 2400
2 Stabilisation of capping layerAssume average thickness 3"Volume of cement reqired 1.5 bagsCost of cement @ 375Tk/bag 563Labour 900
Sub‐total 1463
3 Concrete stump ('kaatla')No. required 14Total cost @ 140Tk/stump (incl 2no. 3/8" screws per kaatla) 1960Labour for making kaatla 200Labour for fixing in ground 200
Sub‐total 2360
4 Posts 15 no.Average length required 8', assume 1 culm gives 2 posts 8 culmsCost of 1no. 3‐4" dia culm (Borobas) 220 TkTotal cost 1760Labour to fix to kaatla & posts 200
Sub‐total 1960
5 Cross bracing & wall plates5no. walls cross braced, approx length 11.5 ftBamboo req. @ 2no. piece per culm, 220Tk ea 3 no. 6606" nails for cross bracing joints 40 pc. 75Bamboo for wall plates, approx length 16ft, maklabas @ 160Tk/ea 6 no. 640Labour 800Nylon string for all bamboo nailed joints, 2kg 175
Sub‐total 2350
6 Roof frameUse 'maklabas' bamboo dia 2‐3", spacing @ 2ft 3in c/cBamboo required, assume 22ft usable length per culm 8 no. 1280Labour to fix rafters 400
Purlins, use 'goranime' timber, 2"x1" @ 420Tk/cuft, total length 250ft 3.5 cuft 1470Labour to fix purlins 400Nails to fix purlins to rafters 220
Side roof, length 10ft, make using bamboo and recycled CI sheetBamboo required 1 no 160
Sub‐total 3930
7 Roof sheetUse 0.26mm thick CI sheet @ 4800Tk per 72ft x2.5ft (1no. 'ban')Length of roof spans = 8ft + 7ft + 7ft 22 ftWidth 18ft 8 sheetsTotal length 176 ft 11733Ridge plate, 18ft length 560Roofing nails 500Labour to fix roof sheets 400
Cost budget breakdown for typical single storey house rev 2 06.07.11
Sub‐total 13193
8 WallsExternal walls to have 3no. rails to support windows and wall cladding 192 ftBamboo req, use 1‐2"dia 'maklabas' bamboo @ 160/Tk ea, assume 18ft usable length 11 no. 1760
Louver, made with 8no. bamboo strip or 'bata', total length required = (2x16') + (2x10') 52 ftBamboo req, assume that 1no. bamboo gives 8no. strips 18ft long. 3 no. 480Labour to fix louvers 400
Lower part of external wall use recycled CI sheet 0Labour to fix rails and CI sheet 200
Assume recycled CI sheet will be used on walls where possible, assume area of 150 sqftCI sheet walls fixed with horizontal bamboo strip at 2ft c/c, length of strip required 200 ftBamboo req, assume that 1no. bamboo gives 8no. strips 18ft long. 1.4 no. 160Tying wire 400Labour, assume 2 men can fix 240sqft in 1 day 250
Remaining area of internal and external walls to be constructed with bamboo mat ('bera') 280 sqftUse bamboo strips or 'bata' at 1 ft c/c on both sides of mat in a grid pattern 1220 ftBamboo req, assume that 1no. bamboo gives 8no. strips 18ft long. 9 no. 1440Cost of bamboo mat, @ 150Tk for 4'6" x 6' sheet 11 no. 1650Labour to fix walls, assume 2 men can make and fix 100 sqft in one day 1120
Sub‐total 7860
9 Borax treatment@ 1Tk per 1ft bamboo, based on vertical soak diffussion method, reusing borax solution 4 times. Total culms (25') 51Total length to be treated 1274 ft 1274Assume labour undertaken by household 0
Sub‐total 1274
10 Doors and windows ‐ basic optionRecycle 1no. door, make 1 new. Use mango wood @450 Tk/cuft 0.4 cuft 180Labour 400
Windows ‐ use bamboo and recycled CI sheetBamboo required 1 no. 440Labour 600
Hinges and nails etc 100
Sub‐total 1720
Total costs 31419 7090 38509Cost per square foot 150 Tk/sqft
Extras costs to improve the finish of the house ‐ make it stand outPaint & brushes for lower CI sheet panels 250 200
Extra bamboo for trims and finishes 3 no. 480
Windows and doors ‐ extra costs for expensive optionExtra bamboo for bamboo strip cladding 6 no. 960Window and door timber, use mango wood @ 450Tk/cuft 1.7 cuft 765Locking chains for doors 160Hinges and nails etc 330Labour for making and fitting 1200
Ladder for access for drying popodoms and access to roofBamboo required 1 no. 220Labour 200
Bamboo frame for roof climbing plantsBamboo required 3 no. 480Labour 400
Plants 500Labour to contruct flower bed 400
Sub‐total 6545
Total costs 4145 2400 6545
Total cost including extra costs 35564 9490 45054Cost per square foot 176 Tk/sqft
Appendix C - Breakdown of costs 2 storey house (Rubi and Fahima’s)
No detailed bill of quantities has been produced but a typical cross section of this house given in
Appendix B – “Sketch of cross section of Rubi & Shabitribala’s house looking east” (house on the
right hand side of page)
Costs include labour and materials only and do not include overheads and management costs of
SAFE.
The floor area of each house is 12’ x 17’ downstairs and 12’ x 15’ upstairs. Total floor area = 384
sqft.
Total cost per house = Tk 39,575 per house
Total cost per sqft = 39,575/384 = 103 Tk/sqft or $1.25 sqft
Note: Costs below are for 2 houses
Job 100 Rubi and Fahima's House
101 Katla BDT 4,379
102 Treated Bamboo (131 pc) BDT 22,308
103 Floor BDT 1,800
104 CI Sheet BDT 12,318
105 Bamboo Matt BDT 1,450
106 Wood/Purlin BDT 1,389
107 Bolts/Others BDT 4,980
150 Labour BDT 29,185
170 Materials Transport BDT 1,339
Total Monthly Expenditure
Total Expenditure BDT 79,148
Appendix D
Field tests of bolted bamboo connections
Improvised field testing of bolted
bamboo connections for use in bracing
of informal housing. 15 June 2012
Samuel G Stephens BE (Hons)
Structural Engineer
SAFE (NGO) Bangladesh
Abstract Improvised field testing was carried out to ascertain a reasonable strength value for bolted bamboo
connections used in the cross-bracing of informal housing.
A single connection strength of 3.9kN was determined (which includes a 0.60 safety factor for
variations in materials and construction) provided that the following requirements are met;
• All cross-bracing members must terminate in a node (a 'node' is a naturally occurring,
regular spaced thickening present in bamboo).
• The end distance between the bolt and the end of the cross-bracing member must not be
less than 2" (51mm)
• The minimum wall thickness of bamboo to be used as a cross-bracing member is to be 3/4"
(19mm)
• The minimum outer diameter of bamboo to be used as a cross-bracing member is to be 2.5"
(63mm)
Further testing is required to confirm these results.
DISCLAIMER:
The following report and all its recommendations are to be used for
informative purposes only. The Author and SAFE (NGO) Bangladesh take no
responsibility for damage to property or life resulting from this report being
used for anything other than its intended purpose.
The following does not purport to be a scientific or definitive document. Field
testing was carried out in an improvised manner to provide at least some
Engineering basis for the improvement of low-cost housing construction in
Bangladesh.
2
Contents
Abstract ................................................................................................................................................... 1
1. Introduction .................................................................................................................................... 3
2. Materials and methods ................................................................................................................... 3
3. As-built cross-bracing survey .......................................................................................................... 5
4. Results ............................................................................................................................................. 5
5. Findings ........................................................................................................................................... 7
a. Initial ........................................................................................................................................... 7
b. Load Capacity ............................................................................................................................. 7
6. Discussion ........................................................................................................................................ 7
a. Suitability of Load Capacity ......................................................................................................... 7
b. Guidelines for construction......................................................................................................... 8
c. Other possible failure mechanisms............................................................................................. 8
i. Receiving member (bamboo beam or post) failure due to splitting. ..................................... 8
ii. Foundations ............................................................................................................................ 9
iii. Tension failure of bamboo brace .............................................................................................. 9
7. Knowledge dissemination ............................................................................................................... 9
8. Literature cited ................................................................................................................................ 9
Appendix A (As-built Survey) ............................................................................................................... 10
Appendix B (Test Data) ......................................................................................................................... 12
3
1. Introduction
SAFE (NGO) works in improvement low-cost housing in Bangladesh. Working primarily in Bamboo,
SAFE strives to build stronger and longer lasting houses for low-income families.
High-winds are one of the biggest hazards for housing in Bangladesh. SAFE has been providing
bamboo cross-bracing to its bamboo framed houses to provide lateral stability. Testing of these
bamboo bracing connections was undertaken, along with Structural Engineering Design Calculations,
to provide an Engineering basis for future design and implementation.
2. Materials and methods
Bracing bays are provided (as shown in figure 1) to every external wall, no more than 12' (3660mm)
apart. Two sets of bracing are used (on either side of the posts) if the wall is shared between two
houses or rooms.
Figure 1 Typical Bracing Bay
Half bamboo members are used to provide tension-only cross bracing. These half bamboo cross-
braces are fixed to vertical bamboo posts or beams using M10 bolts and 32mm circular washers to
construct bracing bays.
By inspection, it was hypothesized that the weakest part of the bracing system would be this bolted
connection between the cross brace and the post or beam (figure 2).
The bamboo used in testing was of the same species, from the same cultivation area and had
undergone the same treatment process as the bamboo used in SAFE construction.
4
It was expected that the connection would fail in a 'pull out' mode, which is to say that Bolt A would
pull out the end of the bamboo cross-brace. This hypothesis was reached because of;
• the small edge distance between the bolt and the end of the cross brace in the direction of
loading.
• the high strength of the bolt compared to the bamboo.
• the much larger size of the full-bamboo post/beam when compared to the half-bamboo
cross brace.
From conventional timber Engineering knowledge (which, as another naturally occurring, cellular
material can be considered a reasonable comparison) it was assumed that the wall thickness of the
test specimen would have a greater effect on its resistance to bolt pull out (and therefore strength)
than the outer diameter of the test specimen.
To best test this connection, it was devised to suspend an idealised connection or test specimen
(figure 3) from a frame (figure 4) with a known weight attached. Weight and therefore force on the
test connection would then be gradually increased until the connection failed.
Figure 2 in-situ bracing connection Figure 3 test specimen
Figure 4 testing rig
Picture 1 testing rig in use
5
3. As-built cross-bracing survey
A survey was undertaken of completed SAFE demonstration houses to ascertain the section
properties of as-built cross-bracing.
Summary of findings
all values in mm
min max average
end distance 30 150 73.8
brace diameter 57 75 63.8
brace wall thickness 9 18 13.5
The results of the survey show large variations in the size and wall thickness of cross-bracing
members as well as end distance.
27% of braces were found to not terminate at a node.
Full survey results can be found in Appendix B.
4. Results
Due to time constraints and the limitations of working in rural Bangladesh, the testing was beset by
problems with the testing equipment. In all, 13 tests were undertaken though only three can be said
to have been completed successfully.
Succesful tests
Wall (mm) Ult. Load (kN) Reason for invalidation
Test B3 10 8.13
Test C 11 6.48
Test E 14 8.17
Invalid Tests
Test Ai 15 0.9 craddle reached ground
Test Bi 9 2.09 additional weight required
Test Ci 13 3.52 loading hook failed
Test A 15 1.04 loading hook failed
Test A2 15 2.82 ropes slipped
Test A3 15 7.62 beam failed
Test B1 10 4.72 bolt rotation in beam
Test B2 10 3.95 beam rotation
Test D 11 4.98 loading bolt b pullout
Test F 11 7.22 beam failure
The sample size is too small to give a scientific indication of joint performance but further testing is
not possible at this time.
6
Picture 2 above shows a typical test specimen under load. Picture 3 shows the same specimen after
it has failed due to Bolt A 'pulling out' through the end of the half bamboo test specimen.
Nodes are visible at both ends of the test specimen.
Full testing results can be found in Appendix B.
8.13
6.48
8.17
0.00
1.00
2.00
3.00
4.00
5.00
6.00
7.00
8.00
9.00
8 10 12 14 16
fail
ure
lo
ad
(k
N)
test specimen wall thickness (mm)
Bolted Bamboo Connection Testing
Results
Succesful tests
Invalid Tests
Picture 2 test B3 under load Picture 3 test B3 after failure
7
5. Findings
a. Initial
Initial testing was fraught with equipment failure though some early assumptions were quickly
confirmed. Namely;
I. End distance (the spacing between the bolt and the end of the bamboo cross-brace in
the direction of the load) has a significant impact on its load carrying capacity. From
initial testing, it was decided that a 2" (51mm) minimum end distance would give
significant additional capacity whilst still being reasonable to construct (greater end
distances are sometimes not feasible due to conflict with door openings and other
framing members).
II. Nodes. Bamboo has naturally occurring thickenings along its length from which shoots
and leaves grow, known as nodes. These nodes are substantially thicker than the rest of
the bamboo and also have a disrupted grain pattern. These physical characteristics
provide an increased strength and resistance to bolt pull-out at the end of the bracing
members. Therefore, all bracing members will be terminated at a node.
b. Load Capacity
Using the limited test data available, a bolted connection strength has been reached by the following
rationale;
• The lower-bound of successful tests was 6.48kN
• A connection safety factor (∅) of 0.60 is deemed appropriate due to the uncontrolled nature
of Bangladeshi construction, variability of materials and uncertainty due to the small testing
sample size.
������� =�����, ��������� × ∅����������������������
������� = 6.48�� × 0.60
� !"#$% = &. '()
6. Discussion
a. Suitability of Load Capacity
From 5. b. (above), a load capacity of 3.9kN has been ascertained for a single connection (including a
0.60 safety factor for connections).
From structural analysis, it has been calculated that the likely (un-factored) force on this connection
during wind loading is 2.32kN.
3.9
2.32= 1.68 ≥ 1.50012345674879:6;< ∴ ok
8
The value of 2.3kN has been determined from a design wind speed of 139km/h (35.5m/s). This design
wind speed is based on the following conditions of IS 875:198722;
47m/s Basic Wind Speed
25 year design life
terrain category three
flat topography
b. Guidelines for construction
From testing results and consideration of construction realities, the following parameters will be set
for the construction of bamboo cross bracing;
• All cross-bracing members must terminate in a node.
• The end distance between the bolt and the end of the cross-bracing member must not be
less than 2" (51mm)
• The minimum wall thickness of bamboo to be used as a cross-bracing member is to be 3/4"
(19mm)
• The minimum outer diameter of bamboo to be used as a cross-bracing member is to be 2.5"
(63mm)
The minimum wall thickness prescribed above is significantly thicker than any used in testing. From
experience, the use of thicker walled bracing will be achievable in practice and this will allow for
some additional load capacity above that stated in this report.
c. Other possible failure mechanisms
i. Receiving member (bamboo beam or post) failure due to splitting.
During testing, failures were observed where Test Bolt A would rotate within the test beam resulting
in the beam cracking longitudinally (picture 2).
The testing involved the beam being loaded
perpendicular to the grain (the weakest
direction). In practice, the cross-brace will be
placed at a 45⁰ angle and, therefore, the
beam/post will be loaded at 45⁰ to the grain (as
opposed to 90⁰ during the test). Studies have
shown that bamboo's compressive strength is in
the order of 4 times stronger in the direction of
the grain (0⁰) than perpendicular to it (90⁰)1.
Therefore, it follows that an increased strength
magnitude of 2 could be reasonably assumed for
loading at 45⁰ and applied to the testing results.
From the two tests that failed due to bolt
rotation and beam splitting (Test B1 and B2) the
lowest strength ascertained was 3.95kN.
However, this was using the same beam that had
already split in test B1 where it achieved a load of 4.72kN and this would be a more accurate
representation of the beams resistance to splitting. If a factor of 2 is applied to 4.72kN, a probable
resistance of 9.44kN is found which is significantly higher than the lower-bound of 6.48kN used in
the load capacity calculations pertaining to pull-out failure. Therefore this failure mechanism is
assumed not to govern.
Picture 4 bolt rotation and cracking of test beam
9
ii. Foundations
After considering results of the bolted connection testing, it is now probable that the foundations
(pre-cast concrete piles known as kaatlas) will govern the bracing design. However, design and
testing of these kaatlas is outside the scope of this report.
iii. Tension failure of bamboo brace
Tension failure of the half bamboo cross-brace itself is not expected to govern as this would have
become apparent during tests. A short section of bamboo connected test bolt A from loading bolt B
and would have served to test the bamboo tensile strength at the same time as testing bolt A.
7. Knowledge dissemination
Findings from this testing will/have be actioned in three areas;
• Structural drawings have been produced showing minimum dimensions and construction
details of bracing for use in future SAFE projects.
• This report will be made publicly available on the SAFE website.
• A leaflet (in Bangla) has been produced and distributed to slum residents outlining
construction requirements for cross-bracing. Refer to Figure 3 below for segment pertaining
to dimensions of cross-bracing. The complete leaflet as well as an English draft can be found
on the SAFE website (http://safebangladesh.wordpress.com)
Figure 3 section of Bangla cross-bracing leaflet
8. Literature cited 1. Mechanical and Physico-Chemical Properties of Bamboos carried out by Aerospace Engineering
Department, Indian Institute of Technology – Bombay with Prof. NK Naik as Principal Investigator.
Retrieved 16th June 2012 from http://www.bambootech.org/files/mechanicaltesting%20report.pdf
2. IS 875:19872. Indian Standard Code of practice for design loads (other than earthquake) For
buildings and structures. Part 3 Wind Loads (Second Revision)
10
Appendix A (As-built Survey)
11
12
Appendix B (Test Data)
13
14
15
Appendix E
Simple guidelines for cross-bracing - leaflet
‡md evsjv‡`ki, euvk w`‡q my›`i I gReyZ Ni ‡md evsjv‡`ki, euvk w`‡q my›`i I gReyZ Ni ‡md evsjv‡`ki, euvk w`‡q my›`i I gReyZ Ni ‡md evsjv‡`ki, euvk w`‡q my›`i I gReyZ Ni ˆZixiˆZixiˆZixiˆZixi Rb¨ wb‡ ©̀kvejx: Rb¨ wb‡ ©̀kvejx: Rb¨ wb‡ ©̀kvejx: Rb¨ wb‡ ©̀kvejx:
‡md& Gi c×wZ gZ Avcbvi Ni ˆZix Ki‡j cÖej evZvm, f~wgK¤ú, So, e„wó, eb¨v †h ‡Kvb `~‡h©vM cÖwZ‡iva Ki‡Z mvnvh¨ Ki‡e| A‡bK
w`b †UKmB n‡e Ges Avcbvi UvKv evR‡e I Rgv n‡e| http://safebangladesh.wordpress.com/
mvavib evwo
A‡bK mgm¨v ����� ���! A‡bK UvKvi cª‡qvRb
Avcbvi mvgvb¨ UvKv cÖ‡qvRb
K_vq µm ¯’vcb Kie tK_vq µm ¯’vcb Kie tK_vq µm ¯’vcb Kie tK_vq µm ¯’vcb Kie t---- µwms Avcbvi N‡ii †`Iqv‡j †hvM Kiv cÖ‡hvRb| ‡`Iqvj ¸wj hw` 12wd‡Ui †ekx nq Ges Bnv hw` gv‡Si ‡`Iqvj nq Zvn‡j `yB fv‡M wef³ K‡i cÖ_g fv‡M µwms
jvMv‡Z n‡e| wØZj N‡ii bx‡Pi Zjvq ‡hLv‡b µwms _vK‡e wVK H eivei Dci Zjvq µwms jvMv‡Z n‡e|
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
“���!”
SAFE
“���!”
“���!”
“‡`Šo”
SAFE
µwµwµwµwms tttt---- A‡a©K evuk w`‡q µm w`‡j Avcbvi N‡ii †`Iqvj gReyZ n‡e cÖej evZvm, f~wgK¤ú, So, e„wó, eb¨v †h ‡Kvb `~‡h©vM cÖwZ‡iva Ki‡Z mvnvh¨ Ki‡e|
mvavib evwo µm eÜbx evwo
µm eÜbx evwo
S‡oi mgq S‡oi mgq S‡oi mgq S‡oi mgq
mnR wKQz civgk© tmnR wKQz civgk© tmnR wKQz civgk© tmnR wKQz civgk© t---- • evu‡ki Ni‡K ‡cvKv Avµgb ‡_‡K i¶vi Rb¨ cvwb‡Z wfRv‡bv I ivmvqwbK c×wZ e¨envi Kiv DwPZ| we¯—vZvwiZ Rvb‡Z SAFE Gi mv‡_ †hMv‡hvM Ki“b|
• N‡ii µwPs I mKj evuk‡K e„wó ‡_‡K i¶v Kivi Rb¨ gReyZ Pvjv e¨envi I ¸i“Z¡c~b© cwiKíbv Mªnb Ki“b|
• euv‡ki †Mvov cPb †_‡K i¶i Rb¨ wm‡g›Ui KvZjv e¨envi Ki“b GwU kw³kvwj n‡e Ges evZvk †_‡K i¶v Ki‡e| KvZjv e¨envi Ki“b GwU kw³kvwj n‡e Ges evZvk †_‡K i¶v Ki‡e|
• gvwU‡Z 5% wm‡g›U wgwkªZ K‡i †`Iqvj c−v÷vi I †g‡S ˆZwi Ki‡j `xN© ¯’vqx nq| • N‡ii cÖwZwU ms‡hvM ¯’‡j ¸bv, jvqjb `wo w`‡q gReyZ K‡i †e‡a †`Iqv DwPZ| cv‡Ui `wo e¨envi Kiv hv‡e bv, Kvib Bnv mn‡RB cPbwkj|
• cÖwZ eQi `~‡h©v‡Mi c~‡e©B cÖ‡qvRb †gvZv‡eM N‡ii cÖwZwU Ask †givgZ Kiv DwPZ|
Avgiv wKfv‡e µm ms‡hvK KietAvgiv wKfv‡e µm ms‡hvK KietAvgiv wKfv‡e µm ms‡hvK KietAvgiv wKfv‡e µm ms‡hvK Kiet---- wWªj w`‡q dzUv K‡i bvU †evë I wLj jvMv‡Z n‡e| µwPs Gi †kl cªv‡š — Aek¨B wMU ivL‡Z n‡e Ges wM‡Ui 2 Bw wfZ‡i bvU jvMv‡Z n‡e, wM‡Ui evwn‡i †hb bv hvq|
gReyZ Qv`tgReyZ Qv`tgReyZ Qv`tgReyZ Qv`t---- gReyZ Qv` ˆZwii GKwU mnR Dcvq, Avcbvi †`Iqv‡ji Dc‡ii AeKvVvg‡Z †Kvb Kzwb evuk KvUv w`‡q jvMv‡Z n‡e|
Av‡iv wKQz Z_¨ :Av‡iv wKQz Z_¨ :Av‡iv wKQz Z_¨ :Av‡iv wKQz Z_¨ : ‡md evsjv‡`ki mn‡hvMxZvq DbœZ Ni ‰Zwii ˆKkj Aí Li‡P gReye evwo wbR nv‡Z ‰Zwi Kwi I `wi`ª Rb †Mvwó †K mn‡hvwMZv Kwi| w`bvRcyi †hv‡Mb eveyi gv‡V SAFE Gi ‰Zwi K…Z N‡i mg¯— ‡KŠkj †`L‡Z cv‡eb| hw` Avcbv‡`i †Kvb Rvbvi _v‡K Zvn‡j ‡hvMv‡hvM Ki“b: cywjb ivq †gvevBj t 01741660420, KbK ivq †gvevBj t 01764973798, I †gv: gvmy` ivbv|
2” (50mm
)
2 © © (50 wgwj wgUvi)
CONSULTING ENGINEERS
2.5” (63mm
)
2.5 © © ( 63 wgwj wgUvi) 3/4” (19m
m)
3/4 © © (19 wgwj wgUvi)
SAFE
CROSS-BRACING
By adding half pieces of bamboo cross bracing to your walls as outlined below,
you’re house will be stronger and resist high winds, storms and earthquakes.
SAFE
SAFE Bangladesh guidelines for
better-building with Bamboo!
Easy steps to help your house resist
wind, earthquake, rain, last longer
and save you Taka!
������� �� �� ��� �� ��
������� �� �� ��� �� ��
��� ����! ���� ���! ��� ���� ������
�প�� ����� ��� ������
Where should I place cross-bracing?
Cross-bracing should be added to EVERY external wall of your house. These walls should
be no more than 12” apart. If they are, a middle wall will need to be braced TWICE. If
house is two-stories, top story bracing should be placed directly above the bracing below.
SAFE
�� ���!
HANDY TIPS
• Use bamboo treated against insect attack for longer lasting house (contact SAFE for more in-
formation)
• Protect cross-bracing and all bamboo from rain and wind using CI sheet and careful planning.
• Use concrete Katla foundation pads to prevent bamboo posts from rotting in the earth.
• Mixing 5% cement with mud plaster will make walls and floor last MUCH longer.
(more tips in Bangla RE: Maintenance)
How do I connect the bracing?
A drill and M16 bolt with washer is required to con-
nect each end of the cross bracing. You must be
careful to have a node at the end of each cross brace
and also have a minimum of 2” (50mm) from the
bolt to the end of the cross brace. Connections are
THE most important part of cross bracing
What Bamboo should I use?
Thicker bamboo is best but size should be at least
2.5” diameter and 3/4” wall thickness as shown on
below;
Roof Bracing
Roof bracing is another easy way to
strengthen your house. Add diagonal bamboo
members to the corners at the top of your walls
and fix with bamboo nails.
MORE INFORMATION
SAFE Bangladesh promotes improved building techniques for low-cost housing in Bangladesh. By
doing this, we help Bangladeshi’s build better and longer lasting houses, with their own hands!
SAFE demonstration houses can be viewed in Jorgen Babur Mart, Dinajpur where you can see all
of these techniques in action.
If you have any questions, contact;
Azit Roy xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Pulin Roy xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Masud xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx SAFE
2” (50mm
)
2.5” (63mm
)
3/4” (19m
m)
Appendix F
Solar light bulb installation report
S. G. Stephens BE (Hons) 1
June 2012
M E M O R A N D U M O N I N I T I A L T R I A L O F S O L A R
B O T T L E B U L B I N J O R G E N B A B U R M A R T S L U M ,
D I N A J P U R , B A N G L A D E S H
Prepared by S. G. Stephens 7th June 2012 for SAFE Bangladesh (NGO)
Pictures and video by Marianne Keating
INTRODUCTION
SAFE Bangladesh is a small NGO working primarily in the low-cost housing sector in North West
Bangladesh. As part of their work improving quality of life through improved building techniques, SAFE
has started to experiment with using water-filled plastic bottles to provide low-heat and electricity-free
lighting.
OVERVIEW OF INTIAL TRIAL
Intial trial bulb was installed 6th June 2012, at the house of local slum builder Delowar. As this was an
initial trial, bulb was placed near wall where it would be less-effective but where it could be placed
through a small section of rather tired corrugated iron (CI) sheet that could be easily replaced.
A 2L coke bottle was filled with a mix of boiled water and approximately 250ml of Clorox liquid bleach
purchased in Dhaka. Bangladeshi bleach seems to be far weaker than the equivalent in the UK. The bottle
of Clorox states an active ingredient (Sodium Hypochlorite) concentration of >5,25%. Taking the label at
its word, the bottle bulb should contain approximately 6.5ml of Sodium Hypochlorite per liter.
The bulb was initially placed and sealed into a small 500x500 section (or 'patch') of CI sheet using McCoy
General Purpose Acetoxy Silione Sealent purchased from a glaziers in Dinajpur. After curing, a hole was cut
in the roofing CI sheet and the bottle and 'patch' sealed on top.
PHOTOS
Bottle and CI sheet 'patch' before sealing Cutting hole in roofing sheet
S. G. Stephens BE (Hons) 2
June 2012
Sealing between patch and roof sheeting Placement
INTIAL COST ESTIMATE
Intial Cost Estimate of Solar Bottle Bulb
In Dinajpur, Bangladesh (June 2012)
Item Cost No. Bulbs Cost/Item
Silicone applicator gun BDT 400 ignored
Tin Shears BDT 100 ignored
2nd hand plastic bottle BDT 10 1 BDT 10
Silicone 280ml tube BDT 250 2 BDT 125
Bleach (1L 5.25% NaOCl) BDT 210 4 BDT 53
CI sheet 'patch' BDT 500 10 BDT 50
BDT 238
238BDT/bulb is possibly too expensive for the Solar Bottle Bulb to be widely adopted in JBM slum.
The following areas could produce savings in the cost of each bulb;
1. Finding a cheaper silicone or sealant, possibly in bulk with a brush application. Important
qualities for the sealent are; elastic, bonds to steel and plastic and resistant to water, sun and
elevated temperatures.
2. Finding a cheaper and locally sourced bleach. 'Bleaching powder' was found in Dinajpur though
this powder had only very week concentrations of Chlorine and was cut with an insoluble
powder that would make the bulb ineffective. Bleach needs to be found with as little colouring as
possible, the Clorox used in the test has a slight yellow tinge which coloured the bulb.
3. Using second hand CI sheet to form the patches. This was done for the initial test bulb though it is
hard to discern a cost for such a second hand item and new CI sheet prices are used in the
calculation above.
S. G. Stephens BE (Hons) 3
June 2012
RESULTS
Once placed, the bulb was very bright and provided a large amount of light into the previously very dark
room. Please refer to http://youtu.be/rlS17jVZ6s0 for a visual demonstration of effectiveness.
The installation will be monitored over the upcoming Bangladesh rainy-season to evaluate effectiveness
and durability of sealing system used.
Room interior with Solar Bottle Bulb covered
Room interior with Solar Bottle Bulb un-covered
S. G. Stephens BE (Hons) 4
June 2012
COMPARISSON TO OTHER LIGHTING ALTERNATIVES
CLEAR PLASTIC CI SHEET
One strip or even a short section of clear plastic corrugated sheet provides large amounts of light into a
room. A 7' sheet costs 700BDT which is approximately 1.5times the cost of the thick CI it replaces. So, this
is not inordinately expensive yet there is not one house in the slum where this has been used.
Possible reasons for the clear plastic sheet not being adopted are;
• Heat. A small, 1'x2' section of the plastic sheet was installed in a SAFE demonstration house and
provided a lot of light though the owner complained about the heat.
• Frailty and durability. The plastic sheeting is seen to be weaker than the CI sheet it replaces and is
likely to get dirty.
Comparing cost;
A 2'4" x 2'6" clear plastic corrugated sheet suitable to make a skylight costs about 233BDT which
is comparable with the 238BDT it cost for the initial trial solar bottle bulb.
It is hoped that the cost of the bottle bulb can be significantly reduced and that it performs better
that the plastic corrugated sheeting in terms of heat and durability therefore making the solar
bottle bulb a viable alternative.
ELECTRIC BULB
Almost all the houses in the slum use at least one electric bulb, sometimes through an illicit connection.
The electric bulb works at night while the solar bulb obviously won't. This disadvantage is somewhat
mitigated by the fact that the electricity supply is very intermittent. During peak irrigation season, rural
areas of Dinajpur can receive as little as a few hours of electricity each day while the sun shines almost
perpetually.
Comparing cost;
From a recent electricity bill, the current price of electricity in Dinajpur appears to be
4.2BDT/kWh (1/6th of the price in the UK).
Assuming a 50watt bulb is used for 6 hours each day;
0.060� × 6ℎ × 4.2��
�ℎ= 1.512
��
���
At the initial solar bottle bulb cost of 238BDT, the payback period is about 5½months.
It is hoped that, by reducing the cost of the solar bottle bulb, the pay-back period can be reduced
and the financial advantage increased.
The cost of a traditional tungsten filament bulb is only 22BDT. If we consider a 5watt energy-
saver bulb, the pay-back period jumps to over 5years. However, the initial cost of an energy saver
bulb is approximately 250BDT and therefore more expensive than the solar bottle bulb. An
energy-saver bulb will also be susceptible to the sporadic electricity supply.
S. G. Stephens BE (Hons) 5
June 2012
LESSONS LEARNED AND KNOWLEDGE GAINED
1. Bulb is effective yet expensive (≈240BDT). Steps described earlier in 'Initial Cost Estimate' could
significantly decrease cost and improve likelihood of technique being adopted.
2. A cheaper and possibly simpler form of sealant needs to be found locally.
3. A cheaper and possibly 'clearer' bleach or disinfectant needs to be found locally.
4. Monitoring and experimentation is required to see which concentrations of which
bleaches/disinfectants are most effective and affordable.
5. It is important to use good quality CI sheet for the patch as well as select a good piece of receiving
CI sheet on the roof. This is because worn CI sheet can have a less-pronounced or deformed
corrugation profile and therefore be difficult to seal.
6. It is important to center both the hole in the patch and the hole in the receiving sheet to the same
orientation of the corrugations. i.e. a corrugation ridge should correspond to the centerline of
both the hole in the patch and the receiving sheet.
7. Financial and other advantages of these bulbs are currently not very convincing to slum
residents. Further study is required to produce a stronger case to submit as to "why?" they should
install a solar bottle bulb.
LONG-TERM VISION
It is hoped that one or more of the local Jorgen Babur Mart slum builders (Delowar, Masud or Baush) can
be trained how to install solar light bottles and do so for a reasonable price while earning some money
for themselves. In short, to create a small entrepreneurial business to provide improved lighting
throughout the slum.
Appendix G
Location key plan of households & interview of household
Shujon Chandra Dash
Shujon going to work wife mum wife growing vegetable Shujon Chandra Dash:
Shujon is the youngest son of Durgoty Das and Zudhishti Chandra Dash. He has 2 sisters and 2 brothers. All his siblings have now moved away and Shujon lives here with his wife, 2 young children and his mum and dad. Shujon works as a day labourer for pond owners outside Dinajpur who farm fish. His work involves catching the fish, maintaining the nets (often involves diving 20-25 ft to the bottom) and cleaning the water. In off season he repairs hemp sacks (bosti). The daily wage he gets from the fish farm varies from 40 taka ($0.5) to 300 taka ($3.5) but on average he will earn $ 35-40 per month. From this, and the income that his wife earns from rolling poppodoms, they support their family and also his aged parents.
His dad is partially sighted and though he does look old he does not look the 101 years that Shujon claims! In January 2012, his father suddenly went missing. The whole family searched all over – the neighbourhood first, then the whole town. Exasperated, they went to seek the advice of fortune tellers. The first advised that he might have gone to Dhaka and so Shujon made the journey and visited friends in the capital but his dad was not to be found. The second
fortune teller advised him that his dad was " in a place from where if was difficult to come back to Bangladesh". On month later, news reached Shujon that his father had been found at his sister’s house in India. Without telling anyone, and without any papers or money, he had managed to cross the border in India, was arrested by the border police and kept in jail for 12 days. Finally the police took pity on his and let him go – one even gave him 150 taka. And so he managed to make his way to his sisters house.
Giribala:
daily allowance in the form of breakfast and lunch. In the one-hour evening shift, she does almost the same amount of work, but does not get any allowance in the form of food. She is living with her daughter, who is about to get married. The new house will increase social value for her daughter's marriage.
Giribala has one son and one daughter and is in her late 50s. Her son stays in Dhaka where he earns money as a rickshaw puller – he can earn much better money there. Giribala works as maid in two houses. Each day she will spend two-hour morning shift for washing clothes, cleaning the floor in a 4-room house. She cuts the vegetables and does all the food preparation before the cooking begins. As a monthly wage, she get 350 taka ($5) from each of the houses, including a
Surujban:
Shurujban Son
After the 1971 Liberation War, Surujban came to stay in Jorgen Babu Marth, from Gaibandha district and started staying rental houses surrounding the field. Her main livelihood is making poppodoms. In the first step, the vendors give the balls of raw dough and she rolls them and lets them dry under the sun. In the second step, she has to repeat the whole process again to make the poppodom thinner and wider. In the dry season, she makes 500 poppodom for 50 taka ($0.60) per day. Her son and daughter-in-law earns 200 to 300 taka in off-season (rainy season) and approx 500 taka per day as brick layers during the construction season. They rent out their three-wheeler rickshaw ‘van’.
Surujban has the intention of saving so with the money she saved from her per diem from the SAFE Workshop, she brought a goat. The goat is now pregnant and she hopes to get two to three baby goats a year which she can sell.
Saidul Rahman:
Saidul Rahman, an Ice-cream vendor in his early 50s has got two daughter and a son. In the winter season, he collects recycling material from door to door in the exchange of his peanuts & pickle. He also sells ice cream around the local area. He works weekly four-to five days a week and earns around 250 taka ($3.00) per day. His eldest daughter got married at the age of 12. He says that if his daughter remained single beyond this age then there might be problems – like she may have an affair. His other daughter, Shathi, is of sixteen years old and is disabled. Shathi was a normal child at birth with only a little working disability with her left hand, but at the age of nine month, was attacked by severe fever which made her lose her vision and left difficulty in her hearing. Over the years, she did regain her vision, but she never learnt to talk. She could still walk holding walls, doors and other kinds of vertical supports, but three years ago she had a severe road accident which took her ability to walk even. All of her family members including her younger brother have to feed her meals three times a day. Sometimes when all the family members are out to work, they tie her leg to the bed stands with rope, so that she does not go crawling around, getting herself hurt. A local NGO has given Shathi a wheelchair to help her become more mobile.
Rubi Begum:
\
Rubi Begum came to Dinajpur after the Liberation War of 1971. She is Muslim. She got married at the age of 13 and had a 9‐years of married life before she became widow with a 2 1/2 year old son and was pregnant with her daughter. Soon enormous pressure was exerted on her to get married again and so she ran away from her home in Gaibanda leaving her son to be looked after by her mother.
She worked as a maid for the first year, and then started to work as a day‐labourer, doing jobs in construction work, earth excavation, and at the rice mill factory.
As she was young, it became really hard for her to work due to indecent verbal abuse from her male co‐workers. She left these jobs and started selling door‐to door glass‐bangles, laces and necklaces. (Her Hindu neighbour sold bangles previously and taught her) Still is still doing this vendor work. She never gave up the fight and says her children were her inspiration to keep‐going in her life.
Her daughter and son‐in‐law stay with her, and two grandchildren. In this new two‐storey house, she has now some space of her own to pray, do her vegetable gardening, as well as dry to poppodom in a hygienic way (i.e not in the street) on the verandah.
Shabitribala
Shabitribala walks with difficulty following and earlier accident but she still works as maid. Shujon, son of Shabitribala, got married recently with a handsome dowry and is happy that he can use some of this money so that he may be able to help his sister into a good marriage. During the off‐season (rainy season), he repair's hessian sacks used for rice and other agricultural produce. During the dry season, he does fishing for the local pond owners earning 3000 to 4000 ($35‐$40)taka per month.
This new house has allowed enough space for all kinds of functions including a room for Shabitribala, one for Shujon and his wife, a prayer space and vegetable gardening.
Dhirinchondro Ray was the actual owner of this land and house for the last ten years. Shabitribala was his wife's younger sister who has been living with them ever since she became a widow.
Shabitribala has a one son and one daughter.
Before the construction of this new demonstration house started Dhirinchondro Roy’s wife, Rongobala died suddenly. Couple of months later, after the new house was about to be finished, Dhirinchondro ran away to Dhaka to re‐marry another elderly lady from Dinajpur. He left this house to Shabitribala and her children.
Beauty:
Beauty got married in her early teens and she moved with him to Dhaka. She says that a month after arriving in Dhaka she realized that her husband was trying to sell her off to sleep with other men. With the help of her cousin, she escaped from Dhaka and came back to mother's home in Dinajpur. Her parents didn't believe her. When husband came back, he convinced her family that everything was fine and stayed with them for two to three months, after which she fell pregnant with their first child. He then fled for 4 years without any trace. When he came back again, he told that he has been in prison all these years but was now a changed man, and Beauty again took him in. Unfortunately after 2.5 years he left again, this time for good and without a trace, leaving her pregnant with her second son, Akash (sky). During this period she earned her living from a variety of jobs including breaking bricks on construction sites and cleaning govt. drains.
Due to social pressure, she had to remarry again and had a third son, Prem. This man was also unfaithful to her and when his activities got exposed he also left Beauty for good.
Beauty with her two elder sons together earns about $5.00 per day. The two eldest sons stopped school so they could work to earn money for their mum. They work repairing jute sacks while Beauty now earns her living by selling deep fried snacks around the neighborhoods.
Nurjahan:
Nurjahan got married when she was very young. She had two daughters and then her husband fell very ill. After suffering severely for couple of years, the illness at last took its toll and he passed away. Money was short and she didn’t even have enough money to pay for the funeral. As a widow she has found it difficult to earn money and she moved back to her father's house with her daughters. Within a few years her father also died and it was not possible for her to stay with her step‐mothers family.
At certain time, Nurjahan started to beg around Dinajpur town. Later on, she became a day labor for quite a long time. Now she works as maid at some households and earns 600 taka ( $7) per month as well as some food from the houses.
Bhagaboti:
Bhogoboty got married around 30 years back witt Atul Proshad Roy when she was 23. After 10 years of her mariage her Atul got married with Bhogobotie's younder sister and all stayed together in the same family for 12 years. Even though B didn’t like Bhogoboty has got one son and three daughters and her sister has got one son and a daughter. Bhogoboty stays with her son now as and her hunsband comes to visit some times as he went to another house eight years back to stay with his younger wife. Bhogoboti cannot stop comming of her husband as their son requested that how can they deny the person who has given birth of them.
She was involved in workshops of diffent ngos. She takes small loans from the N.G.O.s and buys clothes like saree and lungi from the retail market and sells to door to door as her profession. A monthly 2500 taka ($30) is her average income from this. She feels like at least she is not totally dependend on someone. Her son giot married at the age of 16. He stays at the same house with his wife. He works as sales man in a auto flower mill earning 3500 taka ($ 42) per month.
Bhogoboty loves groing vegetables and plants. Wherever she could, she grew lots of vegeables. She also does three times prayer everyday in her praying space with hidu daities and their pictures.
Appendix H
3-day design workshop programme
11.05.11/JA
Simple Action For the Environment (SAFE)
Design Workshop – Jorgen Babur Mart community, Dinajpur, 15-17th May 2010
3 day design workshop with 10 members of the community of Jorgen Babur Mart, architects,
engineers, carpenters and builders. Objectives: to build trust between partners; learn about
building-for-safety techniques appropriate to the context of Jargon Babur Mart, develop designs
for our proposed houses within a specific budget; produce an outline plan for construction.
15.05.11 Day 1 –Existing good practice
10:00 – 10:30 Introduction – getting to know each other.
Objectives (see above)
Activity – each household draws their house on the map.
SAFE – about us
10:30 – 13:30 What is a hazard? What is a disaster?
Activities – brainstorm different hazards and then in groups think of ways to design your houses to overcome them. Followed by short presentation by groups on their findings.
13:30 – 14:30 Lunch
Good practices of resilient low-cost housing in Bangladesh, relevant to Jorgen Babur Mart context. Including
Bamboo treatment Lighting and ventilation – windows; natural ventilation; improved
cook stove Stronger frame – improved bamboo joints; cross-bracing;
concrete foundation posts (kaatla) Walling materials and heat Cement stabilisation for earthen plinth Growing vegetables
16.05.11 Day 2 – Initial design
10:00 – 10:30 Welcome and review of good practices from yesterday afternoon. Objectives for today.
10:30 – 13:30 Design house for Jorgen Babu Mart (2 groups).
Activities include:
Presentation by architect students to groups about initial designs. Model building Groups to focus on different sized houses
13:30 – 14:30 Lunch
14.30 – 16:15 Continue to develop design, incl. cost analysis of each house option (2 groups)
16:15 – 17:00 Informal presentation from each group about each house option
17.05.11 Day 3 – Design review and implementation
10:00 – 10:30 Welcome, objectives for today.
10:30 – 12:30 Design development including revisions with respect to costs.
10:30 – 12:30 Singing with song team
12:30 – 13:30 Presentation about each house option including costs.
13:30 – 14:30 Lunch
14.30 – 16:30 Implementation and management
16:30 – close Certificate award ceremony