presented by:
of
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
RYAN WHITE GRANTEE MEETING
The Impact of Health Reform on Compliance Programs
ADAM J. FALCONE, ESQ.Partner
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
The Impact of Health Reform on Corporate Compliance
2
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
3
After Health Reform….
RAC Program
Expansions
New Funding of Medicare and
Medicare Program Integrity
Enforcement
Higher Risk of False Claims Act
liability
Mandatory Return of
Overpayments within 60 days
Increased OIG
AuthoritiesPatient Protection
and Affordable
Care and ActMandatory Compliance Programs
Knowing Retention of
Overpayments
Enhanced CMP
Penalties
Condition of Enrollment
Lower hurdle for Qui Tam
(whistleblower) lawsuits
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
Compliance program
requirements
Mandatory return of
overpayments
Higher risk of False Claims Act liability
Increased program integrity
activities
Greater OIG enforcement
authority
Key Compliance Implications of Health Reform
4
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
Compliance Program Mandate• Under Health Reform Law:
• As a condition of enrollment in Medicare, Medicaid, and CHIP, providers must establish a compliance program• Expansion of Medicaid under Health Reform Law
• Core components of compliance program to be established by the Secretary of HHS in consultation with the OIG
• Will be specific to particular industry or category of supplier or provider
• Effective after HHS issues regulations
5
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
Mandatory Return of Overpayments• Health Reform Law requires providers to return and
report “overpayments” from the Medicare or Medicaid programs within:• 60 days of identification or • Date corresponding cost report is due
• Health reform law defines “overpayment” as funds that a person or entity receives or retains under Medicare or Medicaid to which the person or entity, after applicable reconciliation, is not entitled.
6
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
Medicare Overpayments Rule• CMS issued proposed rule February 16, 2012• Applies only to payments received or retained under Medicare
Part A and Part B• Adopts definitions from the Health Reform Law
• Overpayment: Includes as example improper costs in cost report• Identified: Knows or should have known standard – imposes duty to
investigate• Applicable reconciliation: Is the cost report
• Requires use of existing Medicare contractor overpayment return forms• Reporting also may be done through OIG or CMS self-disclosure
protocols• 10 year lookback
7
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
8
Higher Risk of False Claims Act Liability• Knowing Retention of Overpayments
• False Claims Act violations result from knowingly and improperly avoiding or decreasing a payment “obligation”
• Health Reform Law makes the knowing retention of overpayment beyond due date (i.e., 60 days from identification or when applicable cost report is due) an “obligation” under the False Claims Act
• Penalties• Up to $11,000 per claim and three times the amount of the
overpayment• OIG can also impose civil monetary penalties (CMPs) or exclude
a provider from participation in Federal health care programs
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
9
Federal Civil False Claims Act 31 U.S.C. § 3729-3733
• The FCA forbids knowingly:• Presenting or causing the presentation of, a false claim for
reimbursement by a Federal health care program, including Medicare or Medicaid;
• Making, using or causing to be made or used, a false record or statement material to a false or fraudulent claim;
• Repaying less than what is owed to the Government;• Knowingly and improperly avoiding or decreasing an
obligation to pay the Government; and/or• Conspiring to defraud the Federal Government through
one of the actions listed above.
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
10
Federal Civil False Claims Act 31 U.S.C. § 3729-3733
• Key Definitions• Claim = request or demand for money or property if
the government provides money or reimburses a person or entity
• Knowingly =• Actual awareness of falsity• Deliberate ignorance of the truth or falsity• Reckless disregard of truth of falsity
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
11
Federal Civil False Claims Act 31 U.S.C. § 3729-3733
• Procedure• Attorney General may bring an action• Qui tam: Private person (relator) can bring an action
in name of government• Must submit formal complaint to court• With written disclosure of all material evidence• Government has 60 days to review and may request
extension• Government decides whether to intervene
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
12
Federal Civil False Claims Act 31 U.S.C. § 3729-3733
• Protects employee whistleblowers from “retaliation” • Whistleblower/Qui Tam Lawsuits
• If government doesn’t intervene, relator may proceed on his or her own, and pays litigation costs.• If successful, relator receives 25-30% of proceeds
• If government takes the case, Government pays litigation costs (and makes litigation decisions) • If successful, relator receives 15-25% of proceeds
• Public Disclosure Bar• Relator cannot base case on public record unless relator was the original
source• Public record = criminal, civil or administrative hearing, congressional or GAO
report, hearing, audit, investigation, or news media• Original source = direct and independent knowledge of the info and voluntarily gave
to government
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
13
Higher Risk of False Claims Act Liability• Health Reform Law makes significant changes to qui tam
provisions of the False Claims Act:• Public disclosure does not require court to dismiss lawsuit
where the government opposes dismissal• State proceedings and private litigation do not qualify as
“public disclosures” • Whistleblowers can proceed under the “original source”
exception to public disclosure without direct (i.e., first-hand) and independent knowledge of the allegations so long as: • The whistleblower voluntarily provided information to the
government prior to public disclosure and • The whistleblower’s information must be independent of and
materially add to publicly disclosed information
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
14
Surge in Financial Support for Enforcement Activities
• Federal Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program (HCFAC) • Established as a requirement under HIPAA to combat fraud
committed against all health plans, both public and private• Jointly directed by the Attorney General and HHS OIG • Designed to coordinate Federal, State and local law
enforcement activities with respect to health care fraud and abuse
• Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Account receives additional $10 million per year for FY 2011-2020
• Reconciliation allocates an additional $250 million to the Account for FY 2011-2016
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
15
Surge in Financial Support for Enforcement Activities• Federal Health Care Fraud and Abuse Control Program (HCFAC) • In FY 2011:
• HCFAC won judgments or negotiated settlements of nearly $4.1billion• U.S. Attorneys Offices opened 1,110 new criminal healthcare fraud
investigations involving 2,561 potential defendants• 743 defendants convicted for healthcare fraud-related crimes • Federal prosecutors had 1,873 health care fraud criminal investigations
pending, involving 3,118 potential defendants, and filed criminal charges in 489 cases involving 1,430 defendants
• DOJ opened 977 new civil health care fraud investigations and had 1,069 civil health care fraud matters pending
• Since 1997, HCFAC has recovered $20.7 billion
• Source: HCFAC Annual Report for FY 2011 (February 2012)
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
16
New Enforcement Entities• In 2006, Congress established a permanent
Recovery Audit Contractor (“RAC”) Program, designed to review Medicare Part A and B claims and correct improper payments
• The Health Reform Law expanded the RAC program to cover Medicare Parts C and D and Medicaid• Predicted to save $2.1 billion over the next five years
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
17
New Enforcement Entities• Final Rule issued by CMS September 16, 2011
• Purpose of RACs: To correct payment errors• Medicaid RACs must report potential fraud to the State,
which must refer the activity to the appropriate authorities• Payments must be made to RACs on a contingency
basis• Compensation scheme is mandated for identified
overpayments • No compensation scheme is mandated for identified
underpayments• Compensation to RACs must be based on amounts recovered
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
18
Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs)• States have considerable flexibility regarding the design, procurement
and operation of their respective RAC programs including:• Establishing the compensation structure for the identification of
underpayments• The number and frequency of medical records to be examined• State appeals process• State exclusion of claims from Medicaid RAC review• Bundling of procurements• Coordination of the collection of overpayments• Contingency fee rates
• States have complete flexibility in the contingency fee rates they pay, exclusive of Federal financial participation (FFP). Absent an exception, however, CMS will provide FFP only for amounts that do not exceed the then-highest contingency fee rate paid to Medicare RACs – 12.5%
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
19
Recovery Audit Contractors (RACs)• Medicaid Provider Protections
• Medicaid RACs:• Limited to a three-year look-back period• Prohibited from auditing claims that they or another entity
(such as Medicare RAC) have already audited• Must notify providers of overpayment findings within 60
days• States must provide adequate appeal processes for
providers to dispute adverse determinations made by Medicaid RACs
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
20
Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MFCU)• Purpose: Finding and reporting Medicaid fraud
• Also investigate and prosecute patient abuse and neglect in health care facilities
• MFCUs are state agencies that must be “separate and distinct” entities from state Medicaid agencies
• Funded through Medicaid grants to States• 49 States and the District of Columbia have
established MFCUs
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
21
MFCU Enforcement Record• Medicaid Fraud Control Units (MFCUs) in FY 2010:
• Obtained 1,329 convictions • Reached 1,077 civil judgments or settlements• Referred 942 individuals and entities for exclusion
from Federal health care programs by the OIG• Recovered:
• $1.8 billion as a result of in court-ordered restitution, fines, civil settlements, and penalties
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
22
Medicaid Fraud Control Units - Statistics
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
23
The Medicaid Integrity Program• In February 2006, Congress created the Medicaid
Integrity Program (MIP)• CMS has two broad responsibilities under the
Medicaid Integrity Program:• To hire contractors to review Medicaid provider
activities, audit claims, identify overpayments, and educate providers and others on Medicaid program integrity issues
• To provide effective support and assistance to States in their efforts to combat Medicaid provider fraud and abuse
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
24
The Medicaid Integrity Program
Medicaid Integrity Program
Division of Medicaid Integrity Contracting
Education MICs
Division of Field Operations
Audit MICs
Division of Fraud Research and
Detection
Review MICs
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
25
Office of Inspector General (OIG)• OIG Enforcement Activities
• FY 2011:• $5.1 billion expected health care recoveries• 2,262 individuals and entities excluded from participation in Federal
health care programs • 1,105 prosecutions or settlements• 614 criminal actions involving health care offenses• 375 civil actions involving health care offenses• 6,848 complaints received for investigation
• Source: OIG Budget Request to Congress for FY 2013 (February 2012)
• FY 2000 (the last time data were released):• OIG’s fraud “hotline” received 526,780 calls
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
26
Federal Grants Financial Management• All Federal grantees must comply with requirements of 45
C.F.R. Part 74, including financial management• Risk areas include:
• Failure to create written procedures for determining reasonableness, allowability, and allocability of costs• And failure to follow those policies after they are implemented
• Failure to comply with federal procurement requirements before awarding contracts worth more than $25,000
• Failure to use personal activity reports to ensure staff time was allocated to the correct grant (where the organization had multiple funding streams)
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
Past OIG Audit Investigation Findings• Not using actual costs as the basis to charge the
program* - Big One!• Assessing higher client copayments than
appropriate• Not separately accounting for copayments
collected• Not using copayment funds to provide additional
program services• Providing services to ineligible clients
27
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
28
Office of Inspector General (OIG)• Under the Civil Monetary Penalties (CMP) Law, the Office of
Inspector General (OIG) may assess penalties for:• False and fraudulent conduct related to Federal health care programs
or beneficiaries, which includes submission of claims that are:• False or fraudulent• Provided by someone who has been excluded from participation in Federal
health care programs• Prohibited by the beneficiary inducement law
• OIG may assess penalties of up to $11,000 for each item or service falsely claimed and up to three times the amount falsely claimed
• OIG may also seek to exclude the provider from participation in Federal and State health care programs
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
29
Expanded Enforcement Authorities• Health Reform Law authorizes the OIG to impose CMPs
when a provider:• Fails to report and return an overpayment, as required under the
new Health Reform Law requirement• Orders or prescribes a medical or other item or service during a
period in which the provider was excluded from a federal healthcare program, if the provider knows or should have known that a claim for such medical or other item or service will be made
• Knowingly makes false statements, omissions, or misrepresentations of a material fact in any application, bid or contract to participate or enroll in a Federal health care program
• Fails to grant to the OIG timely access to documents for the purpose of audits, investigations, evaluations, or other statutory functions
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
30
Increased Financial Penalties• Health Reform Law increases Civil Monetary
Penalties:• Increases the penalty for a false statement or
misrepresentation to $50,000• Allows up to $15,000 per day that provider refuses
access to OIG
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
31
Office of Inspector General (OIG)• Debarment and Exclusion
• No Federal health care program payment may be made for any items or services furnished by an excluded individual or entity• Extends to payment for administrative and management
services not directly related to patient care, but that are a necessary component of providing items and services to Federal program beneficiaries
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
32
Responsible Corporate Officer Doctrine• Under the responsible corporate officer (RCO) doctrine,
individual corporate officers can be found guilty of violating a variety of federal laws without exhibiting any unlawful intent, negligence, knowledge of the violation or direct participation in the wrongdoing
• Instead, under the RCO doctrine, the government only needs to prove that the executive did these three things:• Held a position of responsibility and authority in the corporation• Had the ability to prevent the violation• Failed to prevent the violation
• Sticking one’s head in the sand has never been so dangerous!
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
33
OIG Permissive Exclusion Authority• In October of 2010, HHS-OIG issued guidance on
how it would exercise its discretionary authority to debar individual corporate officers when their company violates health care laws
• Factors the OIG will use for permissive exclusion:• Circumstances of the Misconduct and Seriousness of
the Offense• Individual’s Role in the Sanctioned Entity• Individual’s Actions in Response to the Misconduct• Information about the Entity
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
34
Office of Inspector General (OIG)• Debarment and Exclusion
• All Federal grant applicants and sub-recipients are required to make appropriate certifications that neither they nor their principals are (or have been)• Presently or proposed for debarment/suspension• Declared ineligible• Voluntarily excluded• Within the last 3 years, convicted of or have a civil judgment
against them (or are presently indicted or charged) with respect to fraud, a criminal offense, an antitrust violation, embezzlement, bribery, falsification, theft, or forgery
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
35
Office of Inspector General (OIG)• OIG Exclusions List
• http://www.oig.hhs.gov/fraud/exclusions/exclusions_list.asp
• Government Services Administration (GSA) Excluded Party List System• http://www.EPLS.gov• http://www.SAM.gov
© Feldesman Tucker Leifer Fidell LLP. All rights reserved.
www.FTLF.com
FELDESMANTUCKERLEIFERFIDELL LLP
36
Questions?
Adam J. Falcone, Esq.1129 20th St. NW, 4th FloorWashington, DC 20036