32DeSNE(Se78 2.13931 MARRIOTT 010
REPORT ON THE
GEOLOGICAL MAPPING PROGRAM
MARRIOTT SOUTH CLAIMS
LARDER LAKE MINING DIVISION
FOR
MR. H. E. NEAL
RECEIVED
f EB15 1991SECTION
R. Ri S to, Geologist
September 1990.
l 39
3aD85NEG078 2.13931 MARRIOTT 010C
TABLE OF CONTORTS
Page
1.0 SUMMARY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . l
2.0 INTRODUCTION . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3.0 THE PROPERTY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
4.0 PREVIOUS WORK . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
5.0 GENERAL GEOLOGY . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
6.0 GEOLOGICAL MAPPING RESULTS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
6.1 Vegetation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 46.2 Geology . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
8.0 REFERENCES . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 7
LIST OF FIGURES
Following Page
1. Key Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
2. Claim Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
3. Location Map . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
4. Geological and Prospecting Program Property Map {In pocket at back of Report)
1.0 SUFtAKY
The majority of the property is underlain by basalt and basaltic pyro
clastics transitional between magnesium-rich tholeiitic basalt and calc alkalic basalt. One narrow horizon of iron-rich tholeiitic basalt crosses
the north part of the property. An unknown percentage of the property is
underlain by rhyolite. The only sulphide mineralization noted was in the rhyolite and it consisted of less than H fine disseminated pyrite.
A grid needs to be cut on the property, with lines spaced at 100 m
intervals. The property requires surveying with a large loop time domain E.M. system or a 6 Kw time domain I.P. system.
Page 2.
2.0 INTRODUCTION
A geological mapping and prospecting program was conducted on the Marriott South claims of Mr. H. E. Neal from July 30 to August 2, 1990. The work
was conducted by R. Risto, Geologist of Toronto and Rick Alcock, Geolog
ical Techician of Holtyre. The claim lines, an enlarged airphoto and a
grid of old cut lines {St. Joe Canada; Huxhold, 1985) were used for location control.
The claims were staked to cover a series of Input anomalies defined by an
airborne geophysical survey conducted by Questor Surveys for the Ontario Geological Survey {O.G.S., 1984). On the survey map these anomalies are designated as "possibly caused by overburden". They are, however,
coinicdent with one or more rhyolite horizons mapped by Jensen (1978) and
are on strike with gold enriched sulphide mineralization in Hebecourt
Township, Quebec.
3.0 THE PROPERTY
The property consists of 26 contiguous claims and is located in the southeast part of Marriott Township (Figures l, 2 and 3). The claims are
held by Mr. H. E. Neal of 124 Roxborough Drive, Toronto.
The claims are as follows:
Claim No. Recording Date No. of Claims
L1126257 - L112676 Feb.26, 1990 20L1127236 - L112740Z40 Feb.26, 1990 5L112742MZ Feb.26, 1990 J.
Total 26
The property is accessible by foot from a logging road in Quebec (see
Figure 3) or a trail from Highway 101.
ONTARIOQUE.
\
TIMMINS \ MARRIOTT PROPERTY
THUNDER BAY KIRKLAND LAI\E
\
KEY MAP100 200 300
MILES
H.E. NEAL ft ASSOCIATES LTD.
10*6561
l̂ ^^^^^^-^^^^^''l i'- :::''^;-'r ̂ !kpy' "•••r*ww*--.-w?w- |**w4* *^* i^irt* \^5^' !^*^jJ|^A^\^^j^f^l^^*^;;..^^-T it -~j *fr'-- r -- \- - - ,i -^r - .-t/-^ jt'.-.r- -n ~ -"'r/Vic *,r-."p:-.~- :(i;,^v k- f?) 1^* t ' t A\^,CvL.— ttt'kt A l^i ii**: a l 3^4^- ***^*y* i *T^S l ** . *J**^ k* -***, 1-3* *r *l-.-..\'i-. "' l w* ̂ -, , .,-'l-.. L *' ^*" . 1^, .' . ' l *i*nl^^^'
t 1-MARRtQTTv'SOUTH
PROPEBrf
L '
A
.y
•A,.-'---' . H26E6fe j 1126869 j (126270
.. - J . ., .. .. .. ;
II2\2J,6 11127237 (1127236 ' M™*^ II272401 II2724C
67M;/.. ";
..'•"r^^f'-6e'^ ! '";.'* 1
•y&Llxi
CLAIM MAPMARRIOTT SOUTH
PROPERTYMARRIOTT TWP. 1 inch to 1/2 mile
V TP.
CAMBIOR-COGEMATpok Enplorttlon Co. Lid. J * I-P * **SC""M " li * i 5
Tholeiitic Basalts l\ ' rf-" ^^ 'Ll*-^^KWf..--^:*- gaESi] AU L "
y . AlteredP&rcutfme Quest Project
tt 00 S4.1H -4*4-
OPTIONAUNOREX
MARRIOTT S()UTHPROPERTY
ft TrenchM In Rhyoltt
'l uirota IjKiMn) S(0 ppm In
t:^ H.E. NEAL (26 Claims)
U - .j AUNORHX EXPLORATION INC.j \ (260 Claims)
l 1NCD GOLD OPTION LOCATION MAP
MARRIOTT SOUTH CLAIMS
H.E. NEAL
Scale: 1:40,000
Page 3.
Eddie O'Donnel of Perry Lake Lodge flew the field crew into McDiarmid Lake on board a float-equipped Cessna. The geological crew was housed in a
cabin on the west shore of the lake for the duration of the program.
4.0 PREVIOUS WORK
1973: L. S. Jensen of the O.G.S. mapped Marriott Township at a scale
of 1:63,360.
1984: Ontario Ministry of Natural Resources contracted Questor
Surveys Ltd. to conduct a regional airborne magnetic and electromagnetic survey over the area.
1985: St. Joe Canada Inc. cut lines and conducted a ground magnetic
survey over a portion of the current H. E. Weal property holdings (grid lines are shown on Fig.4). (Huxhold, 1985).
Feb.1990: Property staked by David Laronde Meegwich Inc., Temagami, for
Mr. H. E. Weal.
5.0 GENERAL GEOLOGY
Marriott Township is within the Abitibi Subprovince of the Superior
Structural Province of the Canadian Shield. All rocks are of Archean age. The Marriott South claims are situated on or adjacent to the contact
between the largely tholeiitic Kinojevis Group and the largely calc alkalic Blake River Group (Jensen and Langford, 1985). The Kinojevis
Group is mostly comprised of iron-rich and magnesium-rich basalts while the Blake River Group is comprised of basalts and felsic volcanics.
Jensen's (1978) map indicates that the north half of the Marriott South
property is underlain by massive and pillowed magnesium-rich tholeiitic
basalt flows and pyroclastics and the south half by calc alkalic basalts
Page 4.
and ccmpositionally equivalent pyroclastics. A horizon or several
horizons of rhyolite occur approximately mid-property.
All units strike east-northeast or east-west, young south and dip steeply
south. Jensen's (1978) map shows two northeast trending lineaments crossing the property.
6.0 GEOLOGICAL MAPPING RESULTS
All of the north-south claim lines were traversed and in some cases the
east-west claim lines and the St. Joe grid lines were paced. Some of the pickets remained legible.
Outcrops encountered were mapped and sampled and outcrop areas were
prospected. Types of vegetation were noted.
6.1 Vegetation
The majority of the property is covered by spruce and poplar with
some stands of white birch. In the wetter areas alders and dead spruce prevail. There are occasional cedar trees along the lake
shore and in the wetter areas. Rare white pine were occasionally
noted on ridges.
6.2 Geology
Three different rock types are exposed on the property.
Iron-rich Tholeiitic Basalts
Along the north boundary of claim L1126263 two outcrops of iron-rich
tholeiitic basalt were mapped. They were medium to dark green in
colour and medium grained to gabbroic in texture. They correlate
Page 5.
with a magnetic high, shown on St. Joe's magnetic survey map
(Huxhold, 1985) which strikes east-northeast.
Tholeiitic Basalts
Along the east shore of McDiarmid Lake in the north part of claim
L1127236, three outcrops of non-roagnetic tholeiitic basalt were
mapped. They were medium to light green in colour and massive to
pillowed. One narrow quartz vein (sample MS-2) was sampled in one
of these outcrops but returned no significant gold or arsenic
values.
Magnesium-rich Tholeiitic Basalt or Gale Alkalic Basalt
All other outcrops mapped on the property consisted of light green-
grey massive, pillowed or brecciated basalt. These rocks plot (see
Risto, 1990) as transitional between magnesium-rich tholeiitic basalt and calc-alkalic basalt on various lithogeochemical diagrams.
Rhyolite
Two outcrops of rhyolite were found on claims L1126268 and L1126269.
Some old pits and trenches, well overgrown were found in the vicinity of sample MS-17. The rhyolites were greyish-white, medium
grained and highly silicious. Pyrite *C1I, was finely disseminated
throughout the rock.
Primary structures indicate the rock units strike 60-75 degrees
azimuth, dip south and young south.
Page 6.
7.0 CONCLUSIONS AND REOOMIQiDATIONS
The property was mapped using claim lines and old picket lines. Outcrop
exposure is scarce; perhaps amounting to C.1%. The majority of the
property is underlain by basalt but an unknown percentage of rhyolite is
intercalated with the basalt.
The property requires a ground electromagnetic survey, perhaps UTEM to
delineate possible bedrock conductors associated with the rhyolite units.
R. RistO, M.Se., Geologist
Sept. 1990.
Page 7.
B.O REFERENCES
Huxhold, P., (1985): Report on the Magnetometer Survey, Marriott Town ship, Larder Lake Mining Division, Ontario, St. Joe Canada Inc. Report 314-1.
Jensen, L.S., (1978): Geology of Stoughton and Marriott Townships, Report 173, Ontario Geological Survey, Ministry of Natural Resources, Ontario.
Ontario Geological Survey (1984): Airborne Electromagnetic and Total Intensity Magnetic Survey, Matheson-Black River Area, Marriott Township, District of Cochrane, by Questor Surveys Limited for the Ontario Geological Survey, Map 80601, Geophysical/Geochemical Series, Scale 1:20,000, Survey and Compilation March to July 1983.
Risto, R.W., (1990): Report on Lithogeochemistry Survey, Marriott South Claims for Mr. H. E. Meal.
File.
Ontario 32DeSNEea78 2.13931 MARRIOTT 900
TO BE ATTACHED AS AN APPENDIX TO TECHNICAL REPORTFACTS SHOWN HERE NEED NOT BE REPEATED IN REPORT
TECHNICAL REPORT MUST CONTAIN INTERPRETATION, CONCLUSIONS ETC.
Type of Survey(s). Township or Area. Claim Holder(s)— . A/etl
Survey Company_ Author of Report. TW:Address of Author. 21 A/orrtriJitCovering Dates of Survey..
Total Miles of Line Cut--
..^ 1.0/7-4- O(IJRtcutting to office)
\tf~l -yXL/R^c.- ')
SPECIAL PROVISIONS CREDITS REQUESTED
ENTER 40 days (includes line cutting) for first survey.ENTER 20 days for each additional survey using same grid.
Geophysical —Electromagnetic.
DAYS per claim.
-Other-Geological.
AIRBORNE CREDITS (Special provision credits do not apply to airborne surveys)
Magnetometer. .Electromagnetic,(enter days per claim)
SIGNATURE:.jr'^C
ftutnor'of Report or Agent
Res. Geol.. . Qualifications.Previous Surveys
File No. Type Date Claim Holder
MINING CLAIMS TRAVERSED List numerically
(prefix)
fc(number)
TOTAL CLAIMS-
837 (6/79)
GEOPHYSICAL TECHNICAL DATA
GROUND SURVEYS - If more than one survey, specify data for each type of survey
Number of Stations —————————————————————————Number of Readings . Station interval ______________________________Line spacing—————Profile scale_______________________________———-——————.Contour interval.
Instrument -—
g
Q W O
Accuracy — Scale constant. Diurnal correction method.Base Station check-in interval (hours). Base Station location and value ————
O Instrumentgs1tt! ZW
P-njl rnnfignratinn
Tnil separation
Amirary
Method: Q Fixed transmitter CD Shoot back CD In lineFrpmipnrv
CD Parallel line
WParameters measured.
InstrumentScale constant.Corrections made.
Base station value and location
Elevation accuracy.
Instrument . ——————————————————————————————————————————— Method D Time Domain D Frequency Domain Parameters - On time __________________________ Frequency —————
- Off time ___________________________ Range ————————
— Integration time.
Electrode array —— Electrode spacing . Type of electrode
SELF POTENTIALInstrument.————-—————-——————-.-———————-—-———-———— Range.Survey Method———————————————————————————————————————————
Corrections made.
RADIOMETRICInstrument.——.Values measured
Energy windows (levels).-——-—-———-——-.————-——.————-—————-—..——.Height of instrument____________________________Background Count, Size of detector—-—^-———----————-^——-—.^——--—-———-—--------...——-—-—.-.Overburden -—————-—-——^-.--—--^——--—--—--^-——^^^^^^--^-——-—-^^^
(type, depth — include outcrop map)
OTHERS (SEISMIC, DRILL WELL LOGGING ETC.)Type of survey.-———————-—————-——^—-——-Instrument —-.————-.--—-—.————..-.——————-Accuracy.-.^-————^——————-———————-——Parameters measured.
Additional information (for understanding results).
Type of survey(s)———.
Instrument(s) —————(specify for each type of survey)
Accuracy——————-^———————(specify for each type of survey)
Aircraft used————-———————————--———————-——-.————
Sensor altitude.Navigation and flight path recovery method.
Aircraft altitude________________________________Line Sparing Miles flown over total area__________________________Over claims only.
GEOCHEMICAL SURVEY - PROCEDURE RECORD
Numbers of claims from which samples taken.
Total Number of Samples. Type of Sample.
(Nature of Material)Average Sample Weight-—————— Method of Collection-————————
Soil Horizon Sampled. Horizon Development. Sample Depth———— Terrain ________
Drainage Development———————————— Estimated Range of Overburden Thickness.
ANALYTICAL METHODSValues expressed in: per cent D
p. p. m. Dp. p. b. D
Cu, Pb,
Others_
Zn, Ni, Co, Ag, Mo, As,-{circle)
Field Analysis (.Extraction Method. Analytical Method- Reagents Used ——
Field Laboratory AnalysisNO. ___;——.
SAMPLE PREPARATION(Includes drying, screening, crushing, ashing)
Mesh size of fraction used for analysis——.—
Extraction Method. Analytical Method . Reagents Used .——
Commercial Laboratory (- Name of Laboratory.— Extraction Method—— Analytical Method —— Reagents Used-————.
.tests)
.tests)
.tests)
General. General.
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ontario
Report of Work(Geophysical, Geological, Geochemical and Expenditures)
Mining Act
Instructions: — Please type or print.— If number of mining claims traversed
exceeds space on this form, attach a list.Note: — Only days credits calculated in the
"Expenditures" section may be enteredin the "Expend. Days Cr." columns.
— Do not use shaded areas below.Type of Survey(s)
Claim Holder(s
Address
Survey Company
Name and Address of Aulhoc-\(of Geo-Technical report) y
-~ j* ^^ -^ ownship or Area *
^^ '"^^ ^^ Prosgctor's Licence No.
32.nse .Jo ̂ oMTo , C/v r. ̂ .H^L M i X 4-f lOf'f of SuryeyTfrorfi Si to) -, C?i\ ^o)f/ Miles of line Cut
lhojx(of Geo-Tec
/Us/a.Credits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
For first survey:
Enter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Enter 20 days (for each)
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enter tolal(s) here
Airborne Credits *" t
Note: Special provisionscredits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Geophysical
. - Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
- Other
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days perClaim
Days perClaim
Days per Claim
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Perforrncd-e o or erorrnc - i
G) Cb/o * 1C t\lPerformed on
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total ExpendituresTotal
Days Credits
-^ 15
InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected m columns at right.
Certification Verifying Report orWork
TOining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)Mining Claim
Prefix
•/L tfliiM'T' ^7i|
Expend. Days Cr. Prefix
. M^i^J~!?i!iL -Number
J.2.-2M-Z
0
Expend. D^ys Cr.
-
TonrHrtTTfiber of mining claims covered by this report of work.
For Office Use OnlyTotal DaysCr.Recorded
Date Recorded
Date Approved as Recorded
Mining Recorder
Branch Director
t hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying7y. ^ AJ^M-^ate Certifiedz/*?/ Certified
OntarioMinistry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ministers du Developpement du Nord et des Mines
Mining Lands Section4th Floor, 159 Cedar StreetSudbury, OntarioP3E 6A5
Telephones (705) 670-7264 Fax: (705) 670-7262
Your File: Our File
W. 9108. 00058 2. 13931
May 24, 1991
Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Developmentand Mines4 Government Road, EastKirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2
Dear Sir/Madam:
RE: Notice of Intent dated April 24, 1991 for Geological Survey on mining claims L. 1126257 et al. in the Township of Marriott.
The assessment work credits, as listed with the above-mentioned Notice of Intent have been approved as of the above date.
Please inform the recorded holder of these mining claims and so indicate on your records.
Yours sincerely,
Ron. C. Gashinski,Provincial Manager, Mining LandsMines 8c Minerals Division
DM/j l
cc: M. Harold E. Neal Toronto, Ontario
Assessment File Office */ Toronto, Ontario
M. Richard Ri s to Toronto, Ontario
Resident Geologist Kirkland Lake, Ontario
x-x MlnWfy'L. , Technical A**W [COl Northern Development . V2/ and Umee Work CrtdltaOntario
AMEND
omont Hie2.13931
April 24/91 W.91Q8.00058
EELRecorded Holder
Harold E. NealTownship or Area
Marriott TownshipType of survey and number of
Aaeeatment day* credit per claimGeophyttca!
Electromagnetic day*
Magnetometer — ,.,, — ,- .. day*
Radiometric . ————————————————— - day*
Induced polarization .. , . ., . ,. , day*
0tK*r d*yt
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Claim* A*te**ed" column
p A
0*ftCh*mW^| rteyi
Man day* Q Airborne Q
Special provlilon Q Ground Q
Q Cradit* hava been reduced becau** of partial coverage of claim*.
Q Cradit* have been reduced beceuie of correction* to work data* and figure* of applicant.
Mining Claim* Amend
L. 1126257 to 264 incl. 1126266 to 274 incl. 1127237 to 240 incl. 1127242
Special credit* under tectlon 77 (16) for th* following mining claim*
10 days Geological L. 1126265, 1126275, 1127236
5 days Geological L. 1126276.
No credit* have been allowed for the following mining claim*Q not tuff lclantly covered by the lurvey Q] Inefficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credit* If necettary In order that tha total number of approved euetiment day* recorded on each claim doe* not exceed tha maximum allowed at follow*: Oeophyilcal - 60; Oaologocal - 40; Oaochamlcal - 40; Section 77(10) * 60.
W* (85/12)
ions: - Please type or print.— If number of mining claims traversed
exceeds space on this form, attach a list. Mote: - Only days credits calculated in the
"Expenditures" section may be entered m the "Expend. Days Cr." columns
- Do not use shaded areas below.
Report of WorkMinistry olNorthern Development and Min (Geophysical, Geologic
Geochemical and Expen
ess of Autho/yof Geo-Technical report) v
sd /US/a. ZZA/oMnJaz . ^A/77 M 4 J 4- P ZCredits Requested per Each Claim in Columns at rightSpecial Provisions
F RECEIVEDEnter 40 days. (This includes line cutting)
FED 2 5 1991For each additional survey: using the same grid:
Geophysical
- Electromagnetic
- Magnetometer
- Radiometric
Man Days
Complete reverse side and enteri
Note: Special provisions credits do not apply to Airborne Surveys.
Geological
Geochemical
Electromagnetic
Magnetometer
Radiometric
Days perClaim
Days per Claim
wining Claims Traversed (List in numerical sequence)
Expenditures (excludes power stripping)Type of Work Performed^e^ i
/c * tPs'fo'med on
Calculation of Expenditure Days Credits
Total Expenditures
InstructionsTotal Days Credits may be apportioned at the claim holder's choice. Enter number of days credits per claim selected in columns at right.
PrefixMining Claim
Number
//17IS1Expend. Days Cr.
Tots number of mining claims covered by this report o' work.
Recorded Ho t (Sigwure)
Certification Verifying Report orWorkl hereby certify that l have a personal and intimate knowledge of the facts set forth in the Report of Work annexed hereto, having performed the work or witnessed same during and/or after its completion and the annexed report is true.
Name and Postal Address of Person Certifying
Bate Certified
•36? IBSHZI
Ontario
Ministry ofNorthern Developmentand Mines
Ministere du D6veloppement du Nord et des Mines
Mining Lands Section4th Floor, 159 Cedar StreetSUDBURY, OntarioP3E 6A5
Telephone: Fax:
Your File: Our File :
(705) 670-7264 (705) 670-7262
W. 9108. 00058 2. 13931
April 19, 1991
Mining RecorderMinistry of Northern Developmentand Mines4 Government Road EastKirkland Lake, OntarioP2N 1A2
Dear Madam/Sir:
Enclosed is one copy of a Notice of Intent with statements listing a reduced rate of assessment work credits to be allowed for a technical survey. Please check your records to ensure that the recorded holder is correct. If it is not, please photocopy this letter and attached Notice of Intent, and forward to the new recorded holder. In approximately thirty days from the above date, a final letter of approval of these credits will be sent to you. On receipt of the approval letter, you may then change the work entries on the claim record sheets.
For further information, if required, please contact Dale Messenger at (705) 670-7264.
Yours/sincerely
R: C. CkSshinlkiProvincial Manager, Mining LandsMines 8c Minerals Division
DM/j l Encl.
cc: Mr. Harold E. Neal Toronto, Ontario
Mr. Richard Ri s to Toronto, Ontario
Ministry ofNorthern Development•ndMlnee
Technical Assessment Work Credits
Ontario DateAoril 19/91
PU*
2.13931Mlnlna Recorder^ Report of
w'. 9108.00058
Recorded Holder
Harold E. NealTownihlp or Are*
Marriott Township.Type of wirvey erKl number of
Aateesment deyi credit per clelmGeophysical
FliMrnnuonMift d*y*
M*fl"*iorwt*' . , *i*yf
Radiometric .......days
Inrii.irxH pnlfrlrf finn d*y*
rtth.r d*y*
Section 77 (19) See "Mining Clelrm Aliened" column
ft*ftli^,l 14.6 Ay.
ftft(vhnm|r-*| rUy.
Men days Q Airborne Q
Specie! provision (2 Ground Q
JO Crediti neve been reduced became of partial coverage of claim*.
Q Credit* have been reduced becauie of correction* to work date* and figure* of applicant.
Mining Claims Assessed
L. 1126257 to 276 incl. 1127236 to 240 incl. 1127242
Special credltt under section 77 (16) for the following mining claim*
'
No credit! have been allowed for the following mining dalmiQ not lufficlently covered by the survey Q Insufficient technical data filed
The Mining Recorder may reduce the above credit* If necesury In order that the total number of approved assessment days recorded on each claim does not exceed the maximum allowed as follows: Geophysical - 80; Gaologocal. 40; Geochemical - 40; Section 77(19) - 80.
DAY/TIMER
IN REFERENCE TO:
AIRMAIL. D FIRST CLASS MAIL D INTER-OFFICE D
MESSAGE
LETTER TO SAVE TIME
Type or write your reply in the space below. Then mail the white copy to us and keep the pink copy for your files. You'll save time and effort, and we'll have your answer much faster! Thank you.
REPLY
i /^^vx^i^c.- i/7^0 4- n**U*^#STT~#(-x, O /? . L, A y
v Ar^i /; /^Wvv-x^/ ^ A/d^^^cn r s^i " X l
SIGNEM /^s6-^^S\ /2*~*~*4**'~l-*'^\ l SIGNED
. REOntJfFt FOffM No ?4190 DAY TIME MS OF CANADA 4B?5 Kent Ave . Niagara FallsVnt L?f 6X6
Hol
low
ay T
wp.
( M
. 356)
-' ~
".
. ^
. •'^
vr
'-?
*" i
-- .
," '
;r-fe-.;
?3
•\ ^-
---x
;*-^
r--
t^:.v~
v,--:*
"-: -
PRO
VINC
E O
F^Q
UEB
EC/.
/ ̂
- W
:-4
-*
.4,
- *.
* *
- -:̂
* -
^-Y
r:-;
*jV
---
V-.
'- .
^ l
-' co
.
c/j
-1
l 3
m -c C/i
O> Z o
z*
25 l
Sz.^
o r-
?: -i
> 7C-
Z
n
rn
en n m*
en
TD r > z 2 '-O
C^ ^v .Ni
3 5
o CO vrm
*v 5!i5
a
' 5'y
(V ?-
Q-
x?.
^-S
--,T
;;.*
o (t)
r *.
;r iz
:H
*;"
.a.
H-o
-*-
* l
X-
** .
T -
7- *
*-'
e. -
-^
ig m m
33
2"
O^
-
>S
?o>
o<
CD^5
S
2C
5^Q
>m
(/>
_^s
^qp
Sm
o
IW3s
|gZg
|v
*",
-y
(w
•^m
:- i
: iUV
tS .-
-r^ .
y ~'-
^fci:
v'j-
- - - -
-. v*^-
.
- ^'-*
r:S
? 5
-'i'g
.* >
5-^
9 5
-z^
-" ^
-f ^"S
'*:* r
o
* 0
-n
S^-
S-S
'S ^
i8
S
^ ^ :
-r
v•*
4-f
l
m Q m z D
K.
(A "3
PT,
r*-r
P 8
©n M*
en n > r m rv o---
i:
ô o T:
•^ Z 03
1^. 2-33
Z O
ci'Tn
'l3^
1^ i-S
x
SD
; 2-w-
--O
H.X
. 5or
o v
. ^.-
't
rn -n
.-s
.1
4 -'
O (T
SO
UI26257
111 2626 2 ; L1I26260
ifvL——\-——^t-JL *~~NT-—-
I I f OL 11LII262
*rx* j j
112 6270
MacDiarmid Lake
UJ26276
LII2723
t, rop
'•t r r " -l' i
4~
* j Q/C 4 ftp* ,
GEOLOGICAL AND PROSPECTING PROGRAMMARRIOTT SOUTH CLAIMS
MARRIOTT TOWNSHIP ONTARIO
to, Goo oqist
I l r-