Reliability Issues in Lead free Electronic Assemblies
COST MP 0602 MeetingIPM, Brno, CZ
27th August 2007Paresh Limaye
imec/restricted 2007 2Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Introduction
• Reliability• Types of Reliability issues• Component reliability• PCB reliability• Solder joint reliability• Others
– Sn whiskers
– Brittle Solder failures
• Summary
imec/restricted 2007 3Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Reliability
• From the point of view of the end user Product has to perform as is promised to the
customer AND has to last for as long as possible (or until the user gets tired of using the product)
Probability that the device performs as expected for an expected duration.
• From the point of view of product seller Product has to perform as is promised to the
customer AND has to last for a certain period (Warranty period/time till an newer version of the product is introduced)
imec/restricted 2007 4Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Reliability Issues
Broad categories• Component reliability• PCB reliability• Solder joint reliability• Electro-migration• Sn whiskers• Others…….. Many more
imec/restricted 2007 5Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Reliability – Specific to Lead Free soldering
• Dealing with products, systems, specifications designed for tin lead backed with 50 years of field data
• The increased soldering temperature has a significant impact on product reliability.
• Degradation rate doubles with every 10oC.• Lead-free solder has different mechanical
properties compared to SnPb.
imec/restricted 2007 6Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Components
• Components can be degraded/damaged during the reflow soldering process
• Thermal load: temperature-time– Damage to internal temperature sensitive structure of component:
electrolytes, insulating materials,…
– Shift in electrical performance, reduced life span,…
imec/restricted 2007 7Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Components - Moisture
Absorbed moisture: rapidly expands during reflow soldering may lead to cracking of the component package: pop-corning.
•Absorbed moisture may lead to excessive component warpage
– Opens/Shorts
– Poor quality solder joints
imec/restricted 2007 8Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Printed Circuit Board: laminate
• Lead-free reflow soldering / Hot Air Solder Leveling puts more thermal load on the board.
• Risks:• Via barrel cracking due to CTE mismatch
between Cu barrel and epoxy laminate in Z-direction.
• Delamination• Board sagging• Discoloration
• Important parameters:• Glass transition temperature Tg• Time-to-delamination: T260, T288• Decomposition temperature• Z-expansion: 50-250oC
imec/restricted 2007 9Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Printed Circuit Board: Board finish
• Lead-free HASL (Sn100C, SAC)– High thermal load on PCB: not suitable for thick multilayers
• Immersion Sn– Sn whiskering in unsoldered areas
– Solderability: shelf life, multiple reflow
• Immersion Ag– Solderability: sensitive to sulphur
• NiAu– Au Embrittlement: Immersion OK, electroless (?), electroplated NOT OK.
– Black pad (PCB manufacturer)
– Skip plating (PCB manufacturer)
– Soldering to Ni instead of Cu: slower
• All cases: risk of harmful chemistry residues in via holes.• OSP (Organic Solderability Preservative)
– Solderability
– Invisible quality issues
imec/restricted 2007 10Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Possible solder joint failures
Poor quality solder joint• Insufficient temperature-time: cold joint (assembly)• Excessive temperature-time: brittle joint due to excessive
intermetallics (assembly)• Solderability issue
– Component leads (component manufacturer, storage)
– PCB surface (PCB manufacturer, storage)
• Incompatible metallurgy of lead-finish (design)• Contaminated solder joint (design, assembly)
Good quality solder joint: Fracture failures • Shock• Fatigue
– Vibration
– Thermal cycling
imec/restricted 2007 11Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Key aspects of SAC solders
SnAg3-4Cu leads to increased stress levels!• Stiffer material than SnPb: significantly higher
E-modulus. The same deformation leads to a higher stress level.
• Stronger than SnPb: can bear higher stress levels
• Lower plasticity than SnPb.• Higher solidification temperature leads to
increased stress levels in the component/joint after solidification when thermal mismatch is present.
• Creep rate (deformation under constant load) is 10 to 100 times slower than for SnPb.
imec/restricted 2007 12Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Solder joint: SAC
• SA3-4C may lead to failures elsewhere than in the solder!
• Intermetallic layer• PCB pad lifting• Component pads and body
(ceramic chip)
• SA3-4C solder joints are more susceptible to shock.• SA3-4C solder joints are less resistant to strong
vibrations• Increasing trend to move towards lower Ag content
solders SAC 105 etc.• Metallurgical Mess!!!
imec/restricted 2007 13Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Thermo-mechanical Fatigue
Package
Board
Package
Board
Board
Package
Board
Package has lower CTE – 7-12 ppm/C
Board has higher CTE – 16-18 ppm/C
Thermo-mechanical load is taken up by the solder
imec/restricted 2007 14Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Thermal Cycling
• Solder joints experience creep-fatigue
• Fracture is initiated and the crack grows until the joint is mechanically separated
imec/restricted 2007 15Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Recrystallize/Refined
Grain Zone
Cracking of the joints accompanied /preceded by recrystallization in the region of high strain accumulation
Microstructure – Damage Zone
imec/restricted 2007 16Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Solder joint: Thermo-mechanical fatigue
How is reliability ensured?• Identify the loading mechanism during operation• Identify failure mode and failure distribution• Accelerate failure mode in testing• Compare to qualification standards (themselves
based on acceleration models and past experience/field data)
imec/restricted 2007 17Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Solder joint: Thermo-mechanical fatigue
• Accelerated thermal cycling test: e.g. 0C-100C, 1 cycle/hour
• Determination of failure distribution: e.g. Weibull distribution
• Determination of acceleration factor with respect to field condition based on failure model: e.g. Coffin-Manson, Norris-Landzberg
• Lifetime estimation under field conditions
imec/restricted 2007 18Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Is SAC Reliable enough?Is it as reliable as SnPb?
• NO SINGLE ANSWER
Stress leveldependency(J.-P. Clech)
imec/restricted 2007 19Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Thermal cycle experiments
• 10 mm x 10 mm x 0.68 mm WLCSP device daisy chained– 64 I/O
• Assembled on 2.5 mm thick board (High Tg)• Two pad sizes: 250 m and 450 m • Sn 4%Ag 0.5% Cu – 300 m and 450 m
preformed BGA Spheres
imec/restricted 2007 20Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Thermal Cycling
imec/restricted 2007 21Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Acceleration Factors:SAC
• Norris-Landzberg equation:
• N.Pan et al., HP, 2005; Salmela et. al., Nokia, 2006 have published models for SAC
• Acceleration factor more sensitive to maximum test temperature as well as to the temperature amplitude. Increased acceleration factor compared to SnPb at constant dwell time.
max, max,
1 11.9 0.33
. field test
Ea
k T Ttest field
field test
T fA F e
T f
imec/restricted 2007 22Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Acceleration Factors – Experimental vs Modeled
AFN63 = 1.068(AFe)1.239
R2 = 0.836
AFN63 = 1.037(AFW)1.385
R2 = 0.904
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
0.1 1 10FEM Based AF (N63)
Ex
pe
rim
en
tal A
F(N
63
)
Strain energy based AFStrain based AFCorrelation line+2XX/2Power (Strain based AF)Power (Strain energy based AF)
. field
test
NA F
NNf=C(e)n
imec/restricted 2007 23Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Acceleration Factors – Comparison
0.1
1
10
0.1 1 10
Experimental AF's
Oth
er A
Fs Strain Based AF vs
Experimental AF
Salmela Model vsExperimental AF
Strain Energy based AFvs Experimental AF
Correlation line
Strain Energy basedfatigue life AF vsExperimental AFPower (Strain Energybased AF vs ExperimentalAF)Power (Strain Based AFvs Experimental AF)
Power (Salmela Model vsExperimental AF)
Power (Strain Energybased fatigue life AF vsExperimental AF)
max, max,
11 11.662 0.33
1.
fieldfield test
test
Eac
k T Tfieldtest field
field test ctest
corr TT fA F e
T fcorr T
Salmela’s Model
imec/restricted 2007 24Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Acceleration Factors
• Salmela’s model accounts for the solder material and the component type used
• Tends to over predict the AF at higher range and under predicts at lower ranges
• AF’s based on strain energy density show better correlation with the experimental observations
• We are far from understanding the real accelerated behaviour of SAC solders
• Creep mechanisms and their activation • Creep behavior of the various new alloys being
introduced through the range of temperature of accelerated testing
imec/restricted 2007 25Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Solder joint: Thermo-mechanical fatigue
• Reliability statements are based on accelerated thermal cycling tests.
• These tests have been designed for SnPb solders.
• Accelerated tests give different results depending on test conditions, joint configuration, failure criterion, stress level,..
• 10-100 times lower creep rate of lead-free solders reduces the acceleration factor of the accelerated test.
• Risk: accelerated tests may overestimate fatigue resistance of lead-free solders!
imec/restricted 2007 26Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Solder joint: Contamination
• Solder joint contamination may have a negative impact on the solder joint reliability
• Pb in lead-free solder joint– Source: SnPb solderable finish, contaminated solder bath
– Effect: tendency to form low melting phase SnPbAg (179oC). Weakened solder joint in last solidified region.
• Bi in SnPb solder joint– Source: SnBi solderable finish
– Effect: tendency to form low melting phase PbBi (96oC). Severely weakened solder joint.
• Au in lead-free or SnPb solder joint– Source: NiAu solderable finish
– Effect: formation of highly brittle SnAu intermetallics. Au embrittled solder joint.
imec/restricted 2007 27Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Solder joint: Contamination
• Reports from July 2007 suggest that leaded solder components are becoming scarce
• Assemblies relying on SnPb solders (high rel. applications) may end up being forced to use lead free components
• Long term reliability ????? • Need to understand
– Creep Behaviour of mixed/contaminated alloys
– Accelerated and field cycling behaviour
imec/restricted 2007 28Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Intermetallic related issues
• Other causes of potential solder joint failure• Kirkendall voiding related to differences in diffusion
between elements at solder/base metal interface.– Effect: weakened interface, cracking
along interface
– More severe with lead-free soldering because of high Sn content.
– AgPd not compatible with SAC(?).
– Source of concern, not clear yet.
Electroless Ni/Immersion Au Ni3P precipitation ENIG requires typically 8% P in Ni. Intermetallics growth leads to Ni3P precipitation along interface Brittle interface: cracking Concern for both SnPb as well as lead-free soldering
imec/restricted 2007 29Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Sn whiskering
• SnPb3-10% has been widely used as a solderable lead finish for components. Ban of Pb leads component manufacturers to go for pure Sn because of its low cost, availability and good solderability properties.
• Pure Sn whiskers!• Tin whisker (inspection definition):
A spontaneous columnar or cylindrical filament, which rarely branches, of tin emanating from the surface of a plating finish. (NEMI)
Kinked BranchedOdd-Shaped
Eruptions (OSE)
imec/restricted 2007 30Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
What do we know about whiskers?
•It may create shorts under field operation conditions. It is NOT a production issue!•Satellites/Cruise missiles even Nuclear plants affected by this• It is not only an issue of pure Sn.• Compressive stress in the Sn layer drives whisker growth.• No quantitative view yet on impacting parameters.• Several mitigation techniques: no clear solution.
imec/restricted 2007 31Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Brittleness Testing of Leadfree solders –Charpy Test
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
-200 -180 -160 -140 -120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40 60 80 100
Temperature, oC
Fra
ctu
re t
ou
gh
ne
ss
, J/c
m2
Sn-5%AgSn-4%Ag-0.5%CuSn-3%Ag-0.5%CuSn-37%PbSn-0.7%Cu(Ni)99.99%SnSn-0.7%Cu
Clear ductile to brittle transition for Pb-free solders!
imec/restricted 2007 32Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Brittleness Testing of Leadfree solders – Mini Charpy Test
12
E1=mgH1
(initial energy)
E2=mgH2
(final energy)
L
90°-1
H1=L+Lcos(90-1)=L(1-sin 1)
LL
E=mg(H1- H2)= mgL(sin 2 - sin 1)
hit point
Hammer
Cooling block (down to –150°C)
Sample location
imec/restricted 2007 33Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
0.003
0.004
0.005
0.006
0.007
0.008
0.009
0.01
0.011
-120 -100 -80 -60 -40 -20 0 20 40
Temperature (°C)
En
erg
y A
bso
rbe
d (
J/jo
int)
SAC305
SAC405
SnAg
SnPb
Brittle Solder FailuresEnergy for breaking joints
To Be published in the proceedings of EPTC 2007
imec/restricted 2007 34Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Brittleness Testing of Leadfree solders – Mini Charpy Test
Test at -88ºC
Test at 23ºC
K. Lambrinou
Potential concern for assemblies that operate in high shock/ extreme temperature environment
imec/restricted 2007 35Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Summary
• Reliability issues in leadfree electronic assemblies – various sources– Component reliability, PCB reliability, Solder joint reliability, Sn
whiskers, Flip Chip related ……….. MANY MORE!!!
– Higher melting temperature
– Higher solder stiffness
– Higher propensity to form intermetallics
• Various alloys and surface finishes being used: Metallurgical Mess!!!
• Long term solder joint related effects – Will lead free solders perform as well as tin lead? NO clear answer
imec/restricted 2007 36Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Summary
• Depends on the loading condition is which the solder joint is expected to fail.
• Need for identifying creep mechanisms active in field conditions AND accelerating those in testing
• Need good creep and acceleration models• Mixed leadfree-SnPb solders – very little
information• Sn Whiskers is an issue for high reliability.
applications for which we have no solution• Low temperature brittle behaviour of LF solder
can be an issue.
imec/restricted 2007 37Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Special Thanks to
• Bart Vandevelde• Ingrid De Wolf• Geert Willems (www.rohsservice.be)• IPSI/REMO Group• Dr. Jean Paul Clech, Dr. Robert Darveaux• ALSHIRA Partners –Connectronics,TBP (Geel),
Alcatel-Lucent (Antwepren) Multiboard, IMEC Gent, Interflux, Electronic Apparatus: (http://www.imec.be/ALSHIRA)
imec/restricted 2007 38Paresh Limaye IPSI/REMO
Recommended