Regional Sewerage Program Technical Committee Meeting
AGENDA
Thursday, February 27, 2014 4:00 p.m.
Location Inland Empire Utilities Agency 6075 Kimball Avenue Chino, CA 91708
Thursday, February 27, 2014
Call to Order and Roll Call 1. Approval of Minutes
A. Minutes of January 30, 2014 Meeting
2. Action Item A. Request by the Cucamonga Valley Water District for Two Regional
Connection Points to the Etiwanda Interceptor (CVWD Regional Sewer Connections #CW-16 and #CW-17, Project No. CW19014.03)
3. Informational Items A. 2nd Quarter Budget Variance (Written/Powerpoint) B. Financial Update (Written/Powerpoint) C. Recycled Water Semi-Annual Update (Written/Powerpoint)
4. Receive and File
A. Minutes of the Pretreatment Subcommittee Meeting B. Building Activity Report (YTD) C. Recycled Water Operations Summary
5. Other Business
A. IEUA General Manager’s Update B. Committee Member Requested Agenda Items for Next Meeting C. Committee Member Comments D. Next Meeting – March 27, 2014
6. Adjournment
Regional Sewerage Program Technical Committee Meeting Agenda February 27, 2014 Page 2 of 2
DECLARATION OF POSTING
I, Cheyanne Reseck-Francis, Administrative Assistant of the Inland Empire Utilities Agency, A Municipal Water District, hereby certify that a copy of this agenda has been posted by 5:30 p.m. in the foyer at the Agency's main office, 6075 Kimball Avenue, Building A, Chino, CA on Thursday, February 20, 2014.
Cheyanne Reseck-Francis
APPROVAL OF MINUTES
1A
1
Regional Sewerage Program Technical Committee Meeting
MINUTES OF January 30, 2014 MEETING
CALL TO ORDER A regular meeting of the IEUA/Regional Sewerage Program – Technical Committee was held on Thursday, January 30, 2014, at the Inland Empire Utilities Agency located at 6075 Kimball Avenue, Chino, California. Jim Hill, City of Chino called the meeting to order at 4:02 p.m. ATTENDANCE
Committee Members:
Jim Hill City of Chino
Steve Nix City of Chino Hills
Chuck Hays City of Fontana
Mike Hudson City of Montclair
Ryan Shaw City of Ontario
Rosemary Hoerning City of Upland
P. Joseph Grindstaff Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Absent Committee Members:
Scott Burton City of Ontario
John Bosler Cucamonga Valley Water District
Others Present:
Cheyanne Reseck-Francis Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Chris Berch Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Christina Valencia Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Craig Parker Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Ernest Yeboah Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Javier Chagoyen-Lazaro Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Jesus Plasencia City of Chino
Liza Munoz Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Nicole Greene City of Montclair
Rebecca Long Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Sylvie Lee Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Teresa Velarde Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Warren Green Inland Empire Utilities Agency
IEUA/RSP –Technical Committee Meeting Minutes of January 30, 2014
2
1. APPROVAL OF MINUTES A. Minutes of November 7, 2013 Meeting
Motion: By Chuck Hays/City of Fontana and seconded by Rosemary Hoerning/City of Upland to approve the revised minutes of the November 7, 2013 Technical Committee meeting. Motion carried: Unanimously, with Steve Nix/City of Chino Hills and Ryan Shaw/City of Ontario abstaining.
2. ACTION ITEMS
A. Request by the City of Ontario for One Regional Connection Point to the RP-1 Bypass Sewer (Ontario Regional Sewer Connection #O-96, Project No. CW19014.06) Craig Parker/IEUA gave a brief overview of the recommendation to approve the request by the City of Ontario for one Regional Connection Point to the RP-1 Bypass Sewer (Ontario Regional Sewer Connection #O-96, Project No. CW19014.06).
Motion: By Steve Nix/City of Chino Hills and seconded by Chuck Hays/City of Fontana to approve the request by the City of Ontario for one Regional Connection Point to the RP-1 Bypass Sewer (Ontario Regional Sewer Connection #O-96, Project No. CW19014.06). Motion carried: Unanimously.
B. Approval of the FY 2014/15 Ten Year Capital Improvement Program
Chris Berch/IEUA gave a presentation on the FY14/15 TYCIP, highlighting key changes, planning initiatives, schedule, EDU growth forecasts, budget estimates by fund, the comparison of FY13/14 TYCIP to the FY14/15 TYCIP, and major projects over $5 million.
Motion: By Ryan Shaw/City of Ontario and seconded by Chuck Hays/City of Fontana to approve and make recommendation to the IEUA Board of Directors to approve the FY 2014/15 Ten-Year Capital Improvement Program. Motion carried: Unanimously.
3. INFORMATIONAL ITEMS
A. Financial Update Christina Valencia/IEUA gave a presentation on the FY2014/15 Budget Workshop that was held by the IEUA Board on January 22, 2014. She highlighted the financial position, including total revenues, expenses, fund reserves, debt coverage ratio, and sources/uses of funds. Ms. Valencia also highlighted business goals: fiscal responsibility, workplace environment, business practices, water reliability, wastewater management, and environmental stewardship.
IEUA/RSP –Technical Committee Meeting Minutes of January 30, 2014
3
B. Regional Contract Audit Teresa Velarde/IEUA gave an oral presentation on the Regional Contract Audit. She reviewed specifics of the process, including ensuring clear criteria in contracts with member agencies, following “paper trails”, defining what is working for member agencies and what is not, finding out what resources IEUA can provide, gathering facts, and compiling surveys. Ms. Velarde stated that the current contract expires in 2023, and that this audit will assist in determining now if anything should be changed or updated during the contract renewal process. She stated that she will send out the questionnaire that will be used for the audit to all member agencies so that they can familiarize themselves with it.
C. Self-Regenerating Water Softener Update
Rebecca Long/IEUA gave an oral presentation on the status of the water softener removal program. She stated that the Cities of Chino, Chino Hills, and Ontario have not adopted any ordinances to support the program, and that CVWD is currently in the process of adopting an ordinance. Ms. Long stated that 631 water softeners have been removed to date (2008 through the end of 2013) and that this has kept 291,000 lbs. of salt out of the regional system.
4. RECEIVE AND FILE ITEMS
A. Draft Minutes of the January 7, 2014 Pretreatment Subcommittee Meeting The Draft Minutes of the January 7, 2014 Pretreatment Subcommittee Meeting item was received and filed by the Committee.
B. Building Activity Report (YTD) The Building Activity Report (YTD) was received and filed by the Committee.
C. Recycled Water Operations Summary The Recycled Water Operations Summary was received and filed by the Committee.
D. IEUA Quarterly Water Newsletter
The IEUA Quarterly Water Newsletter was received and filed by the Committee.
5. OTHER BUSINESS A. IEUA General Manager’s Update
P. Joseph Grindstaff/IEUA reported the following:
The Governor has declared a drought. The State reported 15% allocation last month, and we are currently at 12%. He anticipates that the Governor will announce in the near future that there is 0% allocation. The Governor has asked for a voluntary conservation effort of 20%, and it is anticipated that this will become mandatory.
Sharmeen Bhojani has been hired as the Human Resources Manager and Joanne Chan has been hired as the Operations Supervisor.
Montclair Pump Station contract award that was approved for up to $3.3 million by both the Regional Technical and Regional Policy Committees has been combined with the Philadelphia Pump Station contract award for a total which is under the approved amount.
IEUA/RSP –Technical Committee Meeting Minutes of January 30, 2014
4
Recycled Water recharge totals through December 2013 were the best on record with 7,400 acre-feet. Last year’s total Recycled Water use was 32,000 acre-feet and this year’s total is anticipated to reach at least 40,000 acre-feet.
BAR actuals are low at 732 connections to date, which is 25% of what was projected.
B. Committee Member Requested Agenda Items for Next Meeting None.
C. Committee Member Comments None.
D. Next Meeting – February 27, 2014
6. ADJOURNMENT - Meeting was adjourned at 5:15 p.m. Transcribed by:
Cheyanne R. Reseck-Francis Administrative Assistant, IEUA
ACTION ITEM
2A
G:\ PP \ Tech Policy Committee \ 2014 \ 2-27-14 Tech \ CW19014.03 CVWD Reg Connections C-16 CW17
Etiwanda Interceptor
Date: February 27, 2014
To: Regional Technical Committee
From: Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Subject: Request by the Cucamonga Valley Water District for Two Regional Connection
Points to the Etiwanda Interceptor (CVWD Regional Sewer Connections #CW-16
and #CW-17, Project No. CW19014.03)
RECOMMENDATION
It is recommended that the Regional Technical Committee approve the request by the Cucamonga
Valley Water District for two new connection points to the Regional System (CVWD Regional
Sewer Connections #CW-16 and #CW-17, Project No. CW19014.03).
BACKGROUND
On February 5, 2014, IEUA received a request from the Cucamonga Valley Water District
(Attachment “A”) for the approval of two connections to the Etiwanda Interceptor. The purpose
of the connections is to discharge flows from a proposed residential development by Lennar
Homes consisting of 291 condominium units. The connections are required due to a lack of a
CVWD sewer located in close proximity. The connections will be made by two new regional
manholes and will discharge domestic sewer flow to the existing 42-inch sewer pipeline, which
is located in Arrow Route between Pecan Avenue and Hickory Avenue (Attachment “B”).
SUMMARY OF FLOW RATE
CW-16: Peak Flow Rate - 0.30 MGD or 0.46 cfs
CW-17: Peak Flow Rate - 0.10 MGD or 0.15 cfs
The 42-inch Etiwanda Interceptor is designed to deliver a maximum flow rate of 27.8 MGD to
the Regional Water Recycling Plant No. 4. The proposed additional flow rate of 0.40 MGD is
within the capacity of this sewer.
ATTACHMENT 'B'CVWD REGIONAL CONNECTIONS # CW-16 & # CW-17
PECA
N
HICK
ORY
CVWD Regional Connection # CW-16 CVWD Regional Connection # CW-17
Ü
LENNAR HOMESTRACT 18870-1
42" Etiwanda Interceptor
ARROW ROUTEET
IWAN
DA/SA
N SE
VAIN
E CHA
NNEL
INFORMATION ITEM
3A
G:\PP\Technical and Policy Committee\2014\02-27-14 Tech\FY 2013-14 2nd Quarter Budget Variance.docx
Date: February 27, 2014
To: Regional Technical Committee
From: Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Subject: Budget Variance 2nd
Quarter FY 2013/14
RECOMMENDATION
This is an informational item for the Regional Technical Committee to receive and file.
BACKGROUND
This item was presented at the IEUA Board of Directors meeting on February 19, 2014.
Date: February 19, 2014
To: The Honorable Board of Directors
From: P. Joseph Grindstaff
General Manager
Submitted by: Christina Valencia
Chief Financial Officer/Assistant General Manager
Javier Chagoyen-Lazaro
Manager of Finance and Accounting
Subject: FY 2013/14 Second Quarter Budget Variance, Performance Goals
Updates, and Budget Transfer
RECOMMENDATION
This is an informational item for the Board of Directors to receive and file.
BACKGROUND
The Budget Variance report represents the Agency’s financial performance through the second
quarter ending December 31, 2013. Exhibit A provides a comparison of actual revenues and
expenses against the FY 2013/14 Amended Budget including an explanation of significant
variances by categories. Exhibit B provides progress status of Division and Department Goals
and Objectives for the current fiscal year. Exhibit C presents a summary of Capital and O&M
budget transfers approved by management during the second quarter, and Exhibit D provides a
summary of total project budget changes.
The historically dry winter that has resulted in the Drought Declaration by California Governor
has had an impact in some of the revenues and expenses of the Agency during the first half of
current fiscal year.
REVENUES
The Agency’s total revenues and other funding sources at the end of the second quarter were
$61.5 million, or 41% of budget. Key highlights of revenues are:
Connection Fees – Member agencies reported $3.7 million or 41% of the annual budget.
A total of 732 new connections were reported through December compared to annual
budget of 1,800 new EDU connections and to member agencies projections of 2,867.
Budget Variance and Performance Goals Updates for the
Second Quarter Ended December 31, 2013
February 19, 2014
Page 2 of 5
G: Board-Rec/2013/14041 FY 2012/13 Second Quarter Budget Variance and Performance Goals Updates
Recycled Water Sales –Recycled water direct and groundwater recharge sales were $3.2
million (14,235 AF) and $2.0 million (7,377 AF) respectively, for a combined total of
$5.2 million or 73% of the budget. The dry winter supported the sales increase, with total
year to date deliveries of 21,612 AF compared to the 31,400 AF projected for the fiscal
and to 15,570 AF for the same period of the previous year.
MWD LPP Rebate Direct recycled water sales in excess of 3,500 AF and up to 17,000
AF are eligible for rebates from the Metropolitan Water District (MWD) Local Project
Program (LPP) at a rate of $154/AF, for a maximum amount of $2.1 million per fiscal
year. Total rebate received was $1.7 million for 10,948 AF reached 81% of the budget,
compare to $1.3 million and 8,439 AF in the previous year
Property Taxes – The $13.8 million in property tax receipts included $13.6 million of
general ad-valorem property tax receipts and $0.2 million in “pass-through” incremental
taxes (RDA) account for 41.4% of the budget. The first of two pass through RDA pass
through payments from the San Bernardino County Tax Assessor was received in January
for $5.5 million. The second RDA payment from the San Bernardino County Tax
Assessor is expected in June 2014.
Grants & Loans – The total receipts were $6.5 million or 21% of budget; $1.5 million
grants and $5.0 million of SRF loan proceeds from SWRCB for the Southern Area
Recycled Water projects. The total budget of $31.8 million consists of $8.9 million of
grants and $22.9 million of SRF loan proceeds. Lower SWRCB grant and SRF loan
proceeds for the Recycled Water Program are anticipated in this fiscal year due to the
delay of the Central/Wineville projects.
Other Revenues and Reimbursements – The Agency received a total of $3.4 million, or
36% of the annual budget. The reimbursement included $1.5 million from the Inland
Empire Regional Composting Authority (IERCA), $0.6 million from Chino Basin
Desalter Authority (CDA), and $0.8 million from Chino Basin Watermaster (CBWM) for
operating and debt service costs. The total other revenue budget of $9.3 million includes
JPA reimbursements budget of $5.3 million, reimbursement from CBWM of $1.0 million
for O&M and share of debt service for the 2008A bonds, and $1.4 million of capital cost
reimbursements, and annual lease payment of $.6 million for the RP-5 Solids Handling
Facility/REEP.
EXPENSES The Agency’s total expenses at the end of the second quarter were $61.2 million, or 34% of
Amended Budget.
The Amended Budget includes Board approved encumbrances and budget carried over from FY
2012/13 to FY 2013/14 in the amount of $8.5 million; $6.6 million for capital projects and $1.9
Budget Variance and Performance Goals Updates for the
Second Quarter Ended December 31, 2013
February 19, 2014
Page 3 of 5
G: Board-Rec/2013/14041 FY 2012/13 Second Quarter Budget Variance and Performance Goals Updates
million for O&M Expenses. In accordance with Agency Policy A-81 (Fiscal Year-End Carry
Forward of Encumbrances and Related Budget), carry forward encumbrances and budget that are
not expended by December 31st of each year are subject to cancellation, unless otherwise
approved by Executive Management. As of January 31, 2014, a total of $1.5 million in unspent
carry over encumbrances and budget were reversed; $1.1 million from projects and $0.4 million
from O&M expenses.
Capital &
Special
Projects
O&M Total
Carried Forward – September 2013 $6.6 $1.9 $8.5
Encumbrance Return – January 2014 ($1.1) ($0.4) ($1.5)
Total Used or Remaining Encumbrance $5.5 $1.5 $7.0
Key highlights on expenses are:
Employment Expenses – The employment expenses at the end of the second quarter
were $17 million or approximately 48% of the Amended Budget. A total of 33 positions
were vacant at the end of the second quarter, equivalent to an 11% vacancy factor which
compared favorably to the Agency’s targeted 5% vacancy factor (15 FTEs). The
favorable variance was partially offset by payment of the annual sick leave buy in
December, and the one-time compensation adjustment paid in October pursuant to the
Memorandum of Understanding and Personnel Manuals adopted by the Board on
September 4, 2013.
Office and Administrative Expenses – This category expended 30% of the budget
resulting in a favorable variance, which was mainly due to the GM contingency account
with remaining budget of $300,000 and other budgeted items (training, dues and
subscriptions) not anticipated to be expended until later in the year.
Chemicals Expenses –This category expended approximately $2.0 million, or 43% of
Amended Budget. The favorable variance was attributed by lower Polymer usage than
projected due to seasonal variation of solids production and digester performance, along
with the warmer temperatures for the unseasonal weather pattern. Additionally, a change
in treatment process (new dewatering facility) results in a decreased usage of anti-scalant
chemicals for the Non-Reclaimable Wastewater line.
Budget Variance and Performance Goals Updates for the
Second Quarter Ended December 31, 2013
February 19, 2014
Page 4 of 5
G: Board-Rec/2013/14041 FY 2012/13 Second Quarter Budget Variance and Performance Goals Updates
Utilities – This category expended $4.9 million or 51% of the budget, which is slightly
over budget due to higher energy demand during the peak period, (July through October).
The dry winter season also increased recycle water deliveries, resulting in higher energy
demand and pumping costs.
Capital - Total project expenditures through the end of the second quarter were $15.2
million, or 21% of the $73.1 million in the Amended budget. The low capital spending in
the second quarter can be attributed to delays in the construction of several of the larger
budgeted projects. Permit, scope of work, and design delays pushed estimated
construction dates into late in this fiscal year. Current estimates approximately 50% of
the project budget will be used by fiscal year end.
Debt Service – Total debt service expenses were $10.2 million or 46% of the $22.1
million budget for the second quarter. The category is expected to be slightly below
budget for the final two quarters, as the interest rates for the 2008B Variable Rate
Demands Bonds continues to stay low with an average of rate .05% compared to a 1%
budgeted rate.
More detailed explanations of significant revenue and expenses are included in the attached
Exhibit A.
FUND BALANCES AND RESERVES
Total cash and investment position as of December 31
st amount to $138.7 million, as indicated in
the Financial Affairs report. This balance compares with $113.8 million in the same period of
the previous fiscal year and $145 million as of June 30, 2013.
GOALS AND OBJECTIVES
Exhibit B provides information on division and related department goals and objectives and the
status of each through the end of the second quarter. The goals and objectives indicators are
measures used to track the volume and complexity of work by type and to track the effort
invested to accomplish that work. Staff will use the indicators to justify current resource
allocations, requests for additional resources, or re-allocation of staff and to track productivity.
PRIOR BOARD ACTION
The Board reviewed the Agency’s variance report for FY 2013/14 First Quarter Ending
September 30, 2013, on December 18, 2013.
IMPACT ON BUDGET
Budget Variance and Performance Goals Updates for the
Second Quarter Ended December 31, 2013
February 19, 2014
Page 5 of 5
G: Board-Rec/2013/14041 FY 2012/13 Second Quarter Budget Variance and Performance Goals Updates
Positive net revenues of $0.3 million will increase Agency’s fund balances.
I. Actual vs. Budget Summary:
Second Quarter Ended December 31, 2013
% of the Year Elapsed: 50%
AdoptedAnnual Budget
Amended AnnualBudget
ActualQuarter Ended
12/31/13Amended vs.
Actual % of Amended
Budget
Revenues $75,553,237 $75,553,237 $37,307,740 (38,245,497) 49.4%
Other Sources of Fund 75,530,021 75,530,021 24,186,639 (51,343,382) 32.0%
Administrative & Operating Expense (80,410,174) (82,375,273) (35,376,787) 46,998,485 42.9%
CIP Expense (67,981,934) (73,127,684) (15,238,511) 57,889,173 20.8%
Debt Service / Financial Expense (22,494,185) (22,494,185) (10,544,964) 11,949,221 46.9%
Surplus/(Deficit) (19,803,035) (26,913,884) 334,117 27,248,001
EXHIBIT A
0
50
100
150
200
Revenues (Incl. Other Funding Sources)
Administrative & OperatingExpense
CIP Expense Debt Service / FinancialExpense
Mill
ion
s
Actualvs.AnnualBudgetFortheQuarter
EndedDecember31,2013
AmendedAnnualBudget
ActualQuarter Ended12/31/13
Page 1
2. Actual Revenue vs. Budget:
% of the Year Elapsed: 50%
AdoptedAnnual Budget
Amended AnnualBudget
ActualQuarter Ended
12/31/13Amended vs.
Actual % of Amended
Budget
User Charges
Property Tax/ AdValorem
Recycled Water
Interest Income
MWD LPP Rebates
Connection Fees
Grants and Loans
Cost Reimbursements and Other Revenues
Interest Income is approximately 13% of the annual budget, the variance is attributed to a lower average interestrate of return of .448% compared to the budgeted interest rate of 1.0%.
MWD LPP rebate is budgeted at $2.1 million or $154/AF for direct recycled water deliveries up to 17,000 AFY, excluding the initial 3,500 AFY. The second quarter, total rebate revenue is $1.7 million, or 81.1% of budget, equivalent to 10,948 of eligible AF. The previous fiscal year 2nd quarter total LPP rebates were approximately 33% lower at 8 439 AFMember agencies have reported a total of 732 new connections through the second quarter, $3.7 million in new EDU connection fees, 40.6% of the annual $9.0 million (1,800 new EDU connections) budget and 36% lower than the member agencies projection of 2,827 new EDU Connections.Total receipts were $6.5 million, 20.6% of budget; $1.5 million grants and $5.0 million of loan proceeds from SWRCB for the Recycled Water Southern Area projects. Total budget of $31.8 million consists of $8.9 million of grants and $22.9 million of SRF loan proceeds for the Recycled Water Program Southern and Central/Wineville area projects. Due to the delays of the Central/Wineville projects, it is estimated that only 10% of the budgeted SRF loan ($11.5 million) and SWRCB grant receipts ($4 million) for the Central/Wineville projects will be received in the current fiscal year.Budgeted grant reimbursements: (a) $8.7 million from SWRCB/SAWPA/USBR Water Recycling Program for the Southern and Central/Wineville Area projects and (b) $0.2 million from Department of Water Resources (DWR) and CA Dept of Parks Recreation (DPR)Total cost reimbursements and other revenues were $3.4 million or 36.1% of the annual budget. Receipts include reimbursements of $1.5 million from the Inland Empire Regional Composting Authority (IERCA), $.6 million from Chino Basin Desalter Authority (CDA), and $.8 million from Chino Basin Watermaster (CBWM) for operating and debt service costs, $.3 million from lease payments, and $17,000 from energy rebates. The total other revenue budget of $9.3 million, includes JPA reimbursements budget of $5.3 million, reimbursement from CBWM of $1.4 million for O&M, share of debt service for the 2008A bonds, and $1.3 million of capital cost reimbursements, and annual lease payment of $.6 million for the RP-5 Solids Handling Facility/REEP.
User charges were $27 million, or 47% of the Amended Budget. This category includes budgeted EDU servicecharges of $43.5 million; Non-Reclaimable Wastewater volumetric, capacity, strength and administrative fees of$9.0 million; and surcharge revenues for imported water deliveries and monthly meter fees of $4.9 million.
General ad-valorem property tax receipts from the San Bernardino County Tax Assessor receipts are $13.6million and the first payment of RDA pass through payments receipt totaled $0.2 million, for a total of $13.8million, or 41.1% of budget. In January an additional $5.2 million of RDA pass through payments was received,the final annual payment of RDA pass-through tax is due in June.Actual direct and recharged recycled sales water through the second quarter were $3.2 million (14,235 AF) and$2.0 million (7,377 AF), respectively, for a combined total of $5.2 million or 72.8% of budget. Total deliveries of21,612 AF compares favorably to the direct and recharge recycled water budget of 31,400 AF.
Total Revenues $151,083,258 $151,083,258 $61,494,379 $89,588,879 40.7%
Other Revenue 4,069,652 4,069,652 1,268,864 2,800,788 31.2%
Grants & Loans 31,764,226 31,764,226 6,549,570 25,214,656 20.6%
Non-Operating Revenues:
Connection Fees $9,012,600 $9,012,600 $3,663,122 $5,349,478 40.6%
Property Tax - Debt, Capital, Reserves $30,683,543 $30,683,543 $12,705,082 $17,978,461 41.4%
Interest 1,001,032 1,001,032 129,587 871,445 12.9%
MWD LPP Rebate 2,079,000 2,079,000 1,686,146 392,854 81.1%
Cost Reimbursement from JPA 5,251,221 5,251,221 2,155,834 3,095,387 41.1%
Recycled Water Sales 7,151,000 7,151,000 5,204,034 1,946,966 72.8%
Property Tax - O&M 2,668,134 2,668,134 1,104,790 1,563,344 41.4%
Operating Revenues:
User Charges $57,402,850 $57,402,850 $27,027,348 $30,375,502 47.1%
Page 2
3. Actual Operating and Capital Expense vs. Budget:
% of the Year Elapsed: 50%
AdoptedAnnual Budget
Amended AnnualBudget
ActualQuarter Ended
12/31/13Amended vs.
Actual % of Amended
Budget
Employment $35,223,023 $35,223,023 $16,950,276 $18,272,747 48.1%
Admin & Operating 45,187,151 47,152,250 18,426,511 $28,725,738 39.1%
Capital 67,981,934 73,127,684 15,238,511 $57,889,173 20.8%
Debt Service and All Other Expenses 22,494,185 22,494,185 10,544,964 $11,949,221 46.9%
Total Expenses $170,886,293 $177,997,142 $61,160,262 $116,836,880 34.4%
Employment Expense
Financial Expenses
Capital Expense
Administrative & Operating Expense
Professional Fees & Services - 32.6%
Biosolids Recycling - 47.2%
Chemicals - 43.0%
Special and Reimbursable Projects - 9.7% and 14.8%
Favorable variance was due to minimal need of funds for operational emergency repairs, timing of contract laborand contract services as several items are to be performed in the final quarter of the fiscal year. Other itemswhich account for the favorable variance include: computer systems maintenance, lab services, external auditfees, landscaping, and security services.
This category is slightly under budget due to KPI monitoring and normal operating conditions. It is anticipatedthat this category will continue to be on track with the projected budget through the end of the fiscal year.
Employment - 48.1%
Office and Administrative - 30%
Financial Expense - 46.1%
Capital Costs - 20.8%
A combination of factors can be attributed to the favorable variance for chemicals. Unusually dry winter monthsincreased recycled water demands resulted in lower than projected usage of sodium bisulfite. Polymer use wasalso lower than projected due to seasonal variation of solids production and digester performance. Additionally achange in treatment process (new dewatering building) has resulted in a lowered dosage of anti-scalantchemicals for the NRW line, and close monitoring of hydrogen sulfide production and ferric chloride dosing havealso contributed to the favorable variance.
Utilities - 51.4%Utilities was slightly over budget at the end of the second quarter, due higher demand during the "peak season"(October-July). Higher than projected recycled water deliveries year to date, as a result of the unusually drywinter season, also increased pumping costs.
The table below summarizes the major special (O&M) and reimbursable projects. The status updates accountsfor the favorable variance in this category to date: combined actual costs were $.7 million or 12.3% compared toa combined annual budget of $6.4 million.
The favorable second quarter variance is due to continued low variable rate interest expense. The category isexpected to be slightly below budget in this fiscal year as the interest rates on the 2008B Variable RateDemands Bonds continue to average .05% compared to a budgeted rate of 1%.
Capital expenditures through the second quarter were approximately $15.2 million. Delays in scope of work,design, and permit issues have contributed to the reduction of capital expense through the second quarter. A keyfactor is the Central Wineville Area project which has been delayed to conduct geotechnical investigations priorto initiation of construction. Current projections through the end of fiscal year indicate that only approximately50% of the amended budget will be expended. Listed below is a brief status report on some of the major projectscurrently under construction
This category includes both wages and benefits. Employment expenses through the second quarter were $17 million or approximately 48.1% of Amended Budget. The favorable variance was due to a total of 33 vacant /on hold) positions at the end of the quarter, resulting in a vacancy factor of 11.2%; more than double the budgeted 5.0%. Offsetting the vacancy variance was payment of the annual sick-leave buy back in December and the one-time compensation adjustment pursuant to the Memorandum of Understanding and Personnel Manuals adopted by the Board on September 2013.
The favorable variance was mainly due to reduced; office & administrative costs, director's expenses, training,travel related expenses, and avoided election expenses. Online webinar training is being utilized when availablein lieu of offsite training.
Non-Operating Expenses:
Operating Expenses:
Page 3
Capital ProjectAmended FY
2013/14YTD
Expenditure
Budget Amount
Remaining
EN06025 Capital Projects 233,852 7,783,087
EN13045 Wineville Recycled Water Extension Segment B Capital Projects 664 7,000,000
EN13023 Capital Projects 2,171,826 6,100,000
EN13022 Capital Projects 2,881,824 5,100,000
EN07010 CCWRF Recycled Water Pump Station Expansion Capital Projects - 3,750,000
EN13038 RP-1 Outfall Relocation Capital Projects 2,000,000
EN13049 RP-2 Digester No. 4 Dome Improvements Capital Projects 100,352 1,870,180 A pre-construction meeting with W. M. Lyles took place on December 20, 2013, a notice to proceed will be issued to the Contractor in early January 2014. RMS has somesafety concerns regarding the contractor's proposed dome lifting method. RMSrecommends that 18 screw jacks be placed under the dome (on the corbels) and not to relyon ratcheted cables when working under the dome.
This project is funded in part by the State Water Resources Control Board (Grant#SWB012-1). The Jack-and-Bore efforts under the Eucalyptus Avenue and Peyton Drive(City of Chino Hills) intersection continues; and under Ramona Avenue (City of Chino)started in early December. It is anticipated that the Jack-and-Bore efforts at this locationwill continue through January 2014. MNR Construction continued and completed pipelineinstallation in the English Channel, and will continue into the City of Chino residentialstreets - Daisy Drive and Bluebell Drive.
The Contractor, Olsson Construction and their Electrical subcontractor completed themajority of underground mechanical and electrical installations for the RW pump station,electrical equipment has been installed. The Contractor and subcontractors will completeabove ground mechanical piping installation, electrical equipment terminations andcommence field testing of respective systems in the upcoming period.
In late November the legal description of the easement was finalized, in December theappraisal report was issued and provided to the County for review. In January the Countywill verify the determination of the valuation and provide comments.
Summary of major capital and special project expenses and status as of December 31, 2013
The construction bid package for the project will be advertised the last week of February,2014. The construction contract is scheduled for award in June, 2014. The delays are dueto IEUA plans to conduct further baseline geotechnical investigations. The project is toconstruct a 24 and 20 inch recycled water pipeline from the Wineville Recycled WaterPipeline at Jurupa and Wineville to the RP-3 basins at Beech and Jurupa.
The construction bid packages for the projects are being advertised 2014. Thisconstruction contract is scheduled for award in May, 2014. This project has also beendelayed due to plans to conduct further baseline geotechnical investigations. The projectpertains to Wineville RW Extension Pipeline Segment B which was budgeted for incombination with Segment A both segments will be advertised for construction bidsseparately.
This project is funded in part by the State Water Resources Control Board (Grant#SWB012-1). Paso Robles Tank completed installation of the Reservoir in earlyDecember. Coating and painting of the Reservoir started in December, and is anticipatedto be completed at the end of January. Concurrently, the associated pipeline installation,and permanent electrical installation are progressing. Irrigation and landscaping of theReservoir is anticipated to start in late January. IEUA Public Relations efforts and visitswith City of Chino Hills’ residents adjacent to construction efforts are on-going and havebeen well-received. Due to unforeseen conditions during the pipeline installation, theportion of the Horse/Hiking Trail will be closed to public access, and extend into late
930 Zone Recycled Water Reservoir
930 Zone Recycled Water Pipeline
Wineville Extension Recycled Water Pipeline
Page 4
Special & Reimbursable ProjectsAmended FY
2013/14YTD
Expenditure
Budget Amount
Remaining
PL05007 Facilities Master Planning Special Projects 4,091 4,091
WR13023 USBR Vegetative Monitoring Reimbursable Project 20,000 20,000
WR13024 Urban Runoff Capture Retrofits Reimbursable Project 12,442 200,000
WR14003 Wastewater Facilities Update and CEQA Special Projects 505,000
WR14019 IEUA Integrated Regional IRP Special Projects 66,553 450,000
WR14020 Recycled Water Intertie Special Projects 1,868 100,000
EN14039 Digester Gas Analysis Special Projects 2,800 150,000 Expenses have been incurred and invoices are being processed for payment. This projectbudget is for digester gas analysis at RP-1 and net energy metering applicationimplementation at RP-1. The net energy metering application implementation portion wasestablished as contingency and may not be expended by the end of the fiscal year.
100% of the $505,000 budget was encumbered by the end of the second quarter due to anopen PO for the same amount. Work will commence in the third and fourth quarters.Project completion is expected in FY 2014/15.
Project commenced at the end of September and is on track to be completed in FY2014/15.
The project agreement between MWD and IEUA was executed in second quarter; work willcommence in the third quarter.
This project is complete and project closure forms have been submitted to finance.
100% of the budget was expensed as a prepayment that is required by USBR to performwork. Work will commence in the third quarter.
While only ten percent of the budget was expended by the end of the second quarter,major expenses are anticipated to be paid in third and fourth quarters. Project is on track.
Page 5
Exhibit A Detail
Adopted Amended YTD
FY 2013/14 FY 2013/14 Actual %
Annual Annual Quarter Ended YTD Budget# Budget Budget 12/31/2013 Variance Used
OPERATING REVENUES
User Charges $57,402,850 $57,402,850 $27,027,348 ($30,375,502) 47.1%
Recycled Water 7,151,000 7,151,000 5,204,034 (1,946,966) 72.8%
MWD LPP Rebates 2,079,000 2,079,000 1,686,146 (392,854) 81.1%Property Tax - O&M 2,668,134 2,668,134 1,104,790 (1,563,344) 41.4%Cost Reimbursement from JPA 5,251,221 5,251,221 2,155,834 (3,095,387) 41.1%
Interest Revenue 1,001,032 1,001,032 129,587 (871,445) 12.9%TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES $75,553,237 $75,553,237 $37,307,740 ($38,245,497) 49.4%
NON-OPERATING REVENUES
Property Tax - Debt, Capital, Reserves $30,683,543 $30,683,543 $12,705,082 ($17,978,461) 41.4%
Connection Fees (CCRA) 9,012,600 9,012,600 3,663,122 (5,349,478) 40.6%
Grants 8,883,473 8,883,473 1,484,975 (7,398,498) 16.7%
SRF Loan Receipts 22,880,753 22,880,753 5,064,595 (17,816,158) 22.1%
Project Reimbursements 800,547 800,547 806,078 5,531 100.7%
Other Revenue 3,269,105 3,269,105 462,786 (2,806,319) 14.2%TOTAL OPERATING REVENUES $75,530,021 $75,530,021 $24,186,639 ($51,343,382) 32.0%
TOTAL REVENUES $151,083,258 $151,083,258 $61,494,379 ($89,588,879) 40.7%
ADMINISTRATIVE and OPERATING EXPENSES
EMPLOYMENT EXPENSES
Wages $21,202,087 $21,202,087 $11,361,374 $9,840,713 53.6%
Benefits 14,020,936 14,020,936 5,588,902 8,432,034 39.9%
TOTAL EMPLOYMENT EXPENSES $35,223,023 $35,223,023 $16,950,276 $18,272,747 48.1%
ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES
Office & Administrative $1,790,973 $1,823,211 $547,380 $1,275,830 30.0%
Insurance Expenses 568,500 568,500 303,498 265,002 53.4%
Professional Fees & Services 7,502,032 8,196,135 2,673,652 5,522,483 32.6%
Special Projects 3,677,147 4,668,658 452,731 4,215,927 9.7%
Reimbursable Projects 1,284,153 1,701,864 252,725 1,449,139 14.8%
TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVE EXPENSES $14,822,805 $16,958,369 $4,229,986 $12,728,382 24.9%
INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCYFiscal Year 2013/14
CONSOLIDATED BUDGET VARIANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
Second Quarter Ended December 31, 2013
Page 6
Exhibit A Detail
Adopted Amended YTD
FY 2013/14 FY 2013/14 Actual %
Annual Annual Quarter Ended YTD Budget# Budget Budget 12/31/2013 Variance Used
INLAND EMPIRE UTILITIES AGENCYFiscal Year 2013/14
CONSOLIDATED BUDGET VARIANCE ANALYSIS REPORT
Second Quarter Ended December 31, 2013
OPERATING EXPENSES
Material & Supplies/Leases $2,774,742 3,250,693 $1,352,664 $1,898,028 41.6%
Biosolids Recycling 3,498,017 3,489,086 1,646,982 1,842,104 47.2%
Chemicals 4,493,663 4,778,285 2,054,597 2,723,688 43.0%
CSDLAC & SARI, Operating Fees/Water 10,003,039 9,080,932 4,212,170 4,868,762 46.4%
Utilities 9,594,885 9,594,885 4,930,112 4,664,773 51.4%
TOTAL OPERATING EXPENSES $30,364,346 $30,193,881 $14,196,525 $15,997,356 47.0%
TOTAL ADMINISTRATIVEand OPERATING EXPENSES $80,410,174 $82,375,273 $35,376,787 $46,998,485 42.9%
NON-OPERATING EXPENSES
CAPITAL OUTLAY $67,981,934 $73,127,684 $15,238,511 $57,889,173 20.8%
FINANCIAL EXPENSESPrincipal, Financial and Interest Expenses 22,112,093 22,112,093 10,197,621 11,914,472 46.1%
OTHER NON OPERATING EXPENSES 382,092 382,092 347,342 34,750 90.9%
TOTAL NON-OPERATING EXPENSES $90,476,119 $95,621,869 $25,783,475 $69,838,394 27.0%
TOTAL EXPENSES $170,886,293 $177,997,142 $61,160,262 $116,836,879 34.4%
REVENUES IN EXCESS/
(UNDER) EXPENSES ($19,803,035) ($26,913,884) $334,117 ($27,248,001)
FUND BALANCE SUMMARY
Beginning Balance, July 01 $120,401,747 $144,661,865 144,661,865 $0
Surplus/ (Deficit) (19,803,035) (26,913,884) 334,117 (27,248,001)
ENDING BALANCE, June 30 $100,598,712 $117,747,981 144,995,983 $27,248,001
Page 7
Exh
ibit
C
Fu
nd
Date
O &
M
Tra
ns
fer
Fro
m
Cate
go
ryA
mt
Tra
ns
fer
Ou
t
O &
M
Tra
ns
fer
To
Cate
go
ryA
mo
un
t T
ran
sfe
r
InD
escri
pti
on
QT
R
10200
10/1
6/1
3511410
Recru
it -
Advert
s$75,0
00
520980
Pro
fessio
nal S
erv
ices -
Oth
er
$75,0
00
Tra
nsfe
r at
the d
irect
of
the C
FO
to f
und t
he B
oard
-appro
ved
Cla
ssific
atio
n a
nd C
om
pensatio
n s
tudy.
2
10200
10/2
1/1
3502710
Tra
inin
g P
ay -
Non-
Exem
pt
$335,6
62
502110
Reg W
ages -
Non
Exem
pt
$335,6
62
Tra
nsfe
r acro
ss m
ultip
le c
ost
ele
ments
due t
o o
rganiz
atio
nal
changes e
ffective 1
1/1
0/1
32
10200
10/2
1/1
3502120
Reg W
ages -
Exem
pt
Sala
ry$255,8
95
502120
Reg W
ages -
Exem
pt
Sala
ry$255,8
95
Tra
nsfe
r acro
ss m
ultip
le c
ost
ele
ments
due t
o o
rganiz
atio
nal
changes e
ffective 1
1/1
0/1
32
10200
10/2
1/1
3502120
Reg W
ages -
Exem
pt
Sala
ry$49,5
17
502120
Reg W
ages -
Exem
pt
Sala
ry$49,5
17
Tra
nsfe
r acro
ss m
ultip
le c
ost
ele
ments
due t
o o
rganiz
atio
nal
changes e
ffective 1
1/1
0/1
32
10200
10/2
1/1
3502120
Reg W
ages -
Exem
pt
Sala
ry$281,0
98
502120
Reg W
ages -
Exem
pt
Sala
ry$281,0
98
Tra
nsfe
r acro
ss m
ultip
le c
ost
ele
ments
due t
o o
rganiz
atio
nal
changes e
ffective 1
1/1
0/1
32
10200
10/2
8/1
3502110
Reg W
ages -
Non
Exem
pt
$1,4
40,5
69
502110
Reg W
ages -
Non
Exem
pt
$1,4
40,5
69
Direct
wages c
orr
ectio
n.
Orig
inal la
bor
dis
trib
utio
n h
ad
incorr
ect
fund c
ente
r assig
nm
ent.
2
10200
11/2
0/1
3502120
Reg W
ages -
Exem
pt
Sala
ry$1,3
30,5
62
502110
Reg W
ages -
Non
Exem
pt
$1,3
30,5
62
Tra
nsfe
r of
direct
wage e
xpense b
udget
from
vario
us c
ost
cente
rs.
Necessary
due t
o o
rganiz
atio
nal changes.
2
10200
11/2
0/1
3511010
Pre
tream
ent
Depart
ment
$4,5
22,5
49
511010
Sourc
e C
ontr
ol
Depart
ment
$4,5
22,5
49
Tra
nsfe
r acro
ss m
ultip
le c
ost
ele
ments
due t
o o
rganiz
atio
nal
changes.
2
10600
10/2
3/1
3411100
Revenue -
Recycle
d
Wate
r$2,5
50,0
00
411300
Revenue -
Rec W
ate
r
Recharg
e$2,5
50,0
00
Tra
nsfe
r to
recharg
e s
ale
s p
er
T.
Cheng's
request
to a
dju
st
Recycle
d W
ate
r R
echarg
e r
evenue b
udget.
(T
ransfe
r fr
om
multip
le c
ost
cente
rs -
see d
oc f
or
com
ple
te lis
t)2
10600
11/1
4/1
3521010
Contr
act
Labor
$16,0
00
570005
Specia
l P
roje
cts
$16,0
00
Tra
nsfe
r fr
om
O &
M a
ccount
to E
N14048,
RW
AV
Relo
catio
n
over
Deer
Cre
ek C
hannel, t
o a
llow
for
relo
catio
n o
f exis
tin
g
recycle
d w
ate
r air r
ele
ase/v
acuum
relie
f valv
e.
2
10600
12/3
1/1
3521010
Contr
act
Labor
$7,0
00
570005
Specia
l P
roje
cts
$7,0
00
Tra
nsfe
r fr
om
O &
M a
ccount
to E
N14048,
RW
AV
Relo
catio
n
over
Deer
Cre
ek C
hannel, t
o e
sta
blis
hed t
o r
elo
cate
exis
tin
g
recycle
d w
ate
r air r
ele
ase/v
acuum
relie
f valv
e.
Aft
er
the p
re-
bid
jo
b w
alk
, th
e s
cope o
f w
ork
was e
xpanded b
y A
gency s
taff
to a
ddre
s a
dditonal m
ain
tenance n
eeds.
2
10800
11/2
7/1
3530024
Fe
rric
Chlo
r-T
on
$11,0
00
530024
Fe
rric
Chlo
r-T
on
$11,0
00
Tra
nsfe
r due t
o a
n o
uts
tandin
g c
hem
ical in
voic
e t
o C
alif
orn
ia
Wate
r T
echnolo
gie
s.
2
To
tal
O&
M T
ran
sfe
rs
Ou
t$10,8
74,8
52
To
tal
O&
M T
ran
sfe
rs
In$10,8
74,8
52
Inla
nd
Em
pir
e U
tili
ties A
ge
ncy
Inte
r-D
ep
art
men
tal/
Div
isio
n T
ran
sfe
rs F
Y 2
013/1
4
Bu
dg
et
Tra
ns
fer
Exh
ibit
C
Inla
nd
Em
pir
e U
tili
ties A
ge
ncy
Inte
r-D
ep
art
men
tal/
Div
isio
n T
ran
sfe
rs F
Y 2
013/1
4
Bu
dg
et
Tra
ns
fer
Fu
nd
Date
Pro
ject
Pro
ject
Descri
pti
on
Am
t
Tra
ns
fer
Ou
tP
roje
ct
Pro
ject
Descri
pti
on
Am
t T
ran
sfe
r In
Ju
sti
ficati
on
QT
R
10600
10/7
/13
EN
06025
Win
evill
e E
xt
RC
Pip
elin
e S
eg A
$125,0
00
EN
13031
Win
evill
e P
roof
of
Concept
$125,0
00
Tra
nsfe
r fo
r additio
nal w
ork
activitie
s in
clu
din
g w
eedin
g,
bio
logic
al surv
eys a
nd t
opogra
phic
surv
eys t
o c
om
ply
with
regula
tory
perm
it c
onditio
ns.
2
10600
11/4
/13
EN
06025
Win
evill
e E
xt
RC
Pip
elin
e S
eg A
$26,9
13
EN
12014
East
Avenue 1
630 E
RW
P R
elo
catio
n$26,9
13
Tra
nsfe
r to
support
the c
onstr
uctio
n f
or
the r
ecycle
d w
ate
r
pip
elin
e r
elo
catio
n.
2
10600
11/7
/13
EN
12019
GW
R &
RW
SC
AD
A
Syste
m U
pgra
des
$136,0
00
EN
14047
GW
R &
RW
SC
AD
A
Contr
ol U
pgra
des
$136,0
00
Tra
nsfe
r to
EN
14047 t
o a
dd f
undin
g t
o t
he n
ew
pro
ject
whic
h
was s
epara
ted t
o a
ddre
ss t
wo p
roje
ct
schedule
s.
2
10600
11/2
0/1
3E
N14029
WC
Asset
Managem
ent
Pro
j$20,0
00
EN
14049
SO
P f
or
1158/1
050 R
W
Pre
ss Z
ones
$20,0
00
Tra
nsfe
r to
cre
ate
an O
pera
tio
n &
Main
tenance m
anual fo
r
opera
tio
n o
f th
e p
ressure
reducin
g v
alv
e b
etw
een 1
158 a
nd
1050 R
ecycle
d W
ate
r P
ressure
Zo
nes.
Th
e m
anual w
ill
pro
vid
e e
ssentia
l opera
tin
g p
rocedues t
o O
pera
tio
ns s
taff
.
2
Su
bto
tal
WC
$307,9
13
Su
bto
tal
WC
$307,9
13
10800
12/1
8/1
3E
N14021
RP
-1 S
econdary
Cla
rifie
r A
sset
Rehab.
$745,0
00
EN
14052
RP
-1 P
rim
ary
Cla
rifie
r
West
Eff
luent
Pip
elin
e
Repla
cem
ent
$745,0
00
Tra
nsfe
r due t
o c
urr
ent
sta
te o
f th
e a
sset
havin
g r
eached t
he
end o
f its u
sefu
l lif
e.
Main
tenance a
nd O
pera
tio
nal sta
ff
dete
rmin
ed t
hat
pro
ject
EN
14021 w
as u
nnecessary
.
2
Su
bto
tal
RO
$745,0
00
Su
bto
tal
RO
$745,0
00
10900
11/4
/13
EN
11039
RP
-1 D
isin
fectio
n P
um
p
Impro
vem
ents
$372,3
52
EN
12022
RP
-1 A
era
tio
n D
uctin
g
Repair P
roje
ct
$372,3
52
Tra
nsfe
r to
com
ple
te m
ajo
r constr
uctio
n o
f E
N12022 b
efo
re
June 2
014 a
nd a
ddre
ss t
he r
ecent
changes in
the p
roje
ct
scope o
f addin
g a
ctu
ato
rs a
nd a
dditio
nal butt
erf
ly v
alv
es t
o
elim
inate
futu
re r
epla
cem
ent
and a
void
additonal pro
cess
inte
rruptio
ns.
2
10900
12/5
/13
EN
14037
Sew
er
Manhole
s R
ehab
$75,0
00
EN
14050
Colle
ctio
n S
yste
m
Repairs P
hase V
$75,0
00
Tra
nsfe
r to
budget
for
desig
n o
f urg
ent
repairs t
o p
roje
ct
EN
14050.
2
10900
12/1
8/1
3E
N13046
RP
-1 F
lare
Syste
m I
mp.
$532,0
00
EN
14051
RP
-1 C
entr
ifuge B
ldg
Sta
ir a
nd C
atw
alk
Insta
llatio
n
$532,0
00
Tra
nsfe
r to
corr
ect
safe
ty issues r
ela
ted t
o t
he n
ew
dew
ate
rin
g
build
ing.
2
Su
bto
tal
RC
$979,3
52
Su
bto
tal
RC
$979,3
52
To
tal
Pro
ject
Tra
ns
fers
Ou
t$2,0
32,2
65
To
tal
Pro
ject
Tra
ns
fers
In
$2,0
32,2
65
Inla
nd
Em
pir
e U
tilit
ies
Age
ncy
Ch
ange
s in
To
tal P
roje
ct B
ud
gets
Inte
r-D
epar
tmen
tal/
Div
isio
n T
ran
sfer
s FY
20
13
/14
Exh
ibit
D
Fu
nd
Cap
ital
or
Spec
Pro
j?D
ate
Tota
l Pro
j
Bu
dge
t C
han
ge
(Y/N
)?
An
nu
al P
roj
Bu
dge
t
Ch
ange
(Y/N
)?
Ne
w
Pro
j? Y
/N
Pro
ject
Nu
mb
erP
roje
ct T
itle
Ad
op
ted
To
tal
Pro
ject
Bu
dge
t
Pri
or
FY 2
013/
14
TP A
dju
stm
ents
Cu
rren
t To
tal
Pro
ject
Bu
dge
t
Am
t. o
f
Tran
sfer
In /
(Ou
t)
Ne
w T
P B
ud
get
FY 2
013/
14
An
nu
al P
roje
ct
Bu
dge
t
An
nu
al P
roj.
Bu
dge
t
Ch
ange
Ne
w A
nn
ual
Pro
ject
Bu
dge
t
Pro
ject
Tran
sfer
red
To/(
Fro
m)
Rea
son
Fo
r Tr
ansf
er
1050
0C
ap7/
25/1
3Ye
sYe
sN
oEN
1400
8N
RW
S C
on
n &
Em
erg
Pro
ject
s FY
13/1
4$1
00,0
00$0
$100
,000
($58
,000
)$4
2,0
00$1
00,0
00($
58,0
00)
$42,
000
EN13
027
Bu
dge
t tr
ansf
er f
rom
EN
1400
8 to
EN
1302
7 to
fu
nd
co
nst
ruct
ion
, co
nst
ruct
ion
man
agem
ent
cost
s an
d
con
tin
gen
cy f
or
casi
ng
exte
nsi
on
fo
r N
RW
cro
ssin
g U
PR
R in
On
tari
o a
nd
Fo
nta
na.
Cap
7/25
/13
Yes
Yes
No
EN13
027
NR
W C
ross
ing
UP
RR
$52,
000
$0$5
2,00
0$5
8,00
0$1
10,0
00$5
2,0
00$5
8,00
0$1
10,0
00
(EN
1400
8)B
ud
get
tran
sfer
fro
m E
N14
008
to f
un
d c
on
stru
ctio
n, c
on
stru
ctio
n m
anag
emen
t co
sts
and
co
nti
nge
ncy
for
casi
ng
exte
nsi
on
fo
r N
RW
cro
ssin
g U
PR
R in
On
tari
o a
nd
Fo
nta
na.
Cap
9/26
/13
Yes
Yes
No
EN13
011
CM
Mis
c N
RW
S C
on
st
& E
mer
g P
roj F
Y13/
14$2
25,0
00$0
$225
,000
($55
,000
)$1
70,0
00$1
50,0
00($
55,0
00)
$95,
000
EN13
039
Tran
sfer
fro
m E
N13
011
to E
N13
039
to
co
ver
the
inte
rnal
lab
or
cost
s to
clo
se o
ut
the
pro
ject
, wh
ich
was
com
ple
ted
in F
Y201
3. C
ost
s w
ere
no
t ac
cru
ed b
ack
to F
Y 12
/13
du
e to
late
su
bm
itta
l of
invo
ice
in O
ct
2013
Cap
9/26
/13
Yes
Yes
No
EN13
039
Ph
illy
PS
Forc
e M
ain
Cle
ano
ut
Inst
all
$136
,000
$0$1
36,0
00$5
5,00
0$1
91,0
00$6
8,6
63$5
5,00
0$1
23,6
63
(EN
1301
1)
Tran
sfer
fro
m E
N13
011
to E
N13
039
to
co
ver
the
inte
rnal
lab
or
cost
s to
clo
se o
ut
the
pro
ject
, wh
ich
was
com
ple
ted
in F
Y201
3. C
ost
s w
ere
no
t ac
cru
ed b
ack
to F
Y 12
/13
du
e to
late
su
bm
itta
l of
invo
ice
in O
ct
2013
$513
,000
$513
,000
$370
,663
$370
,663
1060
0C
ap7/
29/1
3Ye
sYe
sN
oEN
0602
5W
inev
ille
Ext
RC
Pip
elin
e Se
g A
$18,
155
,518
$0$1
8,15
5,51
8($
35,0
00)
$18,
120
,518
$8,0
00,0
00($
35,0
00)
$7,9
65,0
00
EN13
055
Tran
sfer
fro
m E
N06
025
to E
N13
055
to s
up
po
rt t
he
com
ple
tio
n o
f th
e co
nst
ruct
ion
by
cove
rin
g th
e
chan
ge o
rder
s d
evel
op
ed d
uri
ng
the
con
stru
ctio
n p
has
e an
d in
tern
al la
bo
r co
st t
o c
lose
ou
t th
e p
roje
ct.
Cap
7/29
/13
Yes
Yes
No
EN13
055
RP
-4 P
ow
er
Dis
trib
uti
on
Ass
essm
ent
& R
ep
$279
,550
$0$2
79,5
50$3
5,00
0$3
14,5
50$3
2,4
17$3
5,00
0$6
7,41
7 (E
N06
025)
Tran
sfer
fro
m E
N06
025
to E
N13
055
to s
up
po
rt t
he
com
ple
tio
n o
f th
e co
nst
ruct
ion
by
cove
rin
g th
e
chan
ge o
rder
s d
evel
op
ed d
uri
ng
the
con
stru
ctio
n p
has
e an
d in
tern
al la
bo
r co
st t
o c
lose
ou
t th
e p
roje
ct.
Cap
8/14
/13
Yes
Yes
Yes
EN13
001
San
Sev
ain
e B
asin
Imp
rove
men
ts$2
,525
,000
$0$2
,525
,000
($15
0,00
0)$2
,375
,000
$1,7
00,0
00($
150,
000)
$1,5
50,0
00
EN14
044
Tran
sfer
fro
m E
N13
001
to c
reat
e n
ew p
roje
ct,E
N14
044,
fo
r th
e h
ydra
ulic
an
alys
es o
f th
e re
cycl
ed w
ater
syst
em t
o b
e p
erfo
rmed
as
vari
ou
s sc
enar
ios
dep
icti
ng
exis
tin
g an
d f
utu
re f
acili
ties
an
d d
eman
ds
as
dir
ecte
d b
y IE
UA
Cap
8/14
/13
Yes
Yes
Yes
EN14
044
RW
Hyd
rau
lic M
od
elin
g$0
$0$0
$150
,000
$150
,000
$0$1
50,0
00$1
50,0
00
EN13
001
Tran
sfer
fro
m E
N13
001
to c
reat
e n
ew p
roje
ct,E
N14
044,
fo
r th
e h
ydra
ulic
an
alys
es o
f th
e re
cycl
ed w
ater
syst
em t
o b
e p
erfo
rmed
as
vari
ou
s sc
enar
ios
dep
icti
ng
exis
tin
g an
d f
utu
re f
acili
ties
an
d d
eman
ds
as
dir
ecte
d b
y IE
UA
Cap
8/14
/13
Yes
Yes
Yes
EN13
001
San
Sev
ain
e B
asin
Imp
rove
men
ts$2
,525
,000
($15
0,00
0)$2
,375
,000
($10
0,00
0)$2
,275
,000
$1,5
50,0
00($
100,
000)
$1,4
50,0
00
EN14
045
Tran
sfer
fro
m E
N13
001
to c
reat
e n
ew p
roje
ct, E
N14
045,
to
dev
elo
p a
lon
g te
rm s
trat
egy
for
the
pro
gram
ove
r th
en n
ext
10-2
0 ye
ars
for
its
ult
imat
e d
irec
t u
se a
nd
pro
ject
ed g
rou
nd
wat
er r
ech
arge
pro
ject
s
Cap
8/14
/13
Yes
Yes
Yes
EN14
045
RW
Pro
gram
Str
ateg
y$0
$0$0
$100
,000
$100
,000
$0$1
00,0
00$1
00,0
00
(EN
1300
1)
Tran
sfer
fro
m E
N13
001
to c
reat
e n
ew p
roje
ct, E
N14
045,
to
dev
elo
p a
lon
g te
rm s
trat
egy
for
the
pro
gram
ove
r th
en n
ext
10-2
0 ye
ars
for
its
ult
imat
e d
irec
t u
se a
nd
pro
ject
ed g
rou
nd
wat
er r
ech
arge
pro
ject
s
Cap
8/20
/13
Yes
Yes
No
EN06
025
Win
evill
e Ex
t R
C
Pip
elin
e Se
g A
$18,
155
,518
($35
,000
)$1
8,12
0,51
8($
30,0
00)
$18,
090
,518
$7,9
65,0
00($
30,0
00)
$7,9
35,0
00
EN13
055
Tran
sfer
fro
m E
N06
025
to
EN
1305
5 su
pp
ort
th
e co
mp
leti
on
of
the
con
stru
ctio
n b
y co
veri
ng
the
chan
ge
ord
ers
dev
elo
ped
du
rin
g th
e co
nst
ruct
ion
ph
ase
and
inte
rnal
lab
or
cost
to
clo
se o
ut
the
pro
ject
.
Cap
8/20
/13
Yes
Yes
No
EN13
055
RP
-4 P
ow
er
Dis
trib
uti
on
Ass
essm
ent
& R
ep
$279
,550
$35,
000
$314
,550
$30,
000
$344
,550
$67,
417
$30,
000
$97,
417
(EN
0602
5)Tr
ansf
er f
rom
EN
0602
5 t
o E
N13
055
sup
po
rt t
he
com
ple
tio
n o
f th
e co
nst
ruct
ion
by
cove
rin
g th
e ch
ange
ord
ers
dev
elo
ped
du
rin
g th
e co
nst
ruct
ion
ph
ase
and
inte
rnal
lab
or
cost
to
clo
se o
ut
the
pro
ject
.
Cap
8/28
/13
Yes
Yes
Yes
EN13
001
San
Sev
ain
e B
asin
Imp
rove
men
ts$2
,525
,000
($25
0,00
0)$2
,275
,000
($75
,000
)$2
,200
,000
$1,4
50,0
00($
75,0
00)
$1,3
75,0
00
EN14
046
Tran
sfer
fro
m E
N13
001
to c
reat
e n
ew p
roje
ct, E
N14
046,
to
cre
ate
an O
&M
Man
ual
fo
r th
e re
cen
tly
exp
and
ed R
P-5
Pu
mp
Sta
tio
n t
o p
rovi
de
esse
nti
al o
per
atin
g p
roce
du
res
to O
per
atin
g St
aff
Cap
8/28
/13
Yes
Yes
Yes
EN14
046
RP
-5 R
W P
um
p S
tati
on
O&
M M
an$0
$0$0
$75,
000
$75,
000
$0$7
5,00
0$7
5,00
0 (E
N13
001)
Tran
sfer
fro
m E
N13
001
to c
reat
e n
ew p
roje
ct, E
N14
046,
to
cre
ate
an O
&M
Man
ual
fo
r th
e re
cen
tly
exp
and
ed R
P-5
Pu
mp
Sta
tio
n t
o p
rovi
de
esse
nti
al o
per
atin
g p
roce
du
res
to O
per
atin
g St
aff
Cap
10/7
/13
Yes
Yes
No
EN06
025
Win
evill
e Ex
t R
C
Pip
elin
e Se
g A
$18,
155
,518
($65
,000
)$1
8,09
0,51
8($
125,
000)
$17,
965
,518
$7,9
35,0
00($
125,
000)
$7,8
10,0
00
EN13
031
Tran
sfer
fro
m E
N06
025
to E
N13
031
for
add
itio
nal
wo
rk a
ctiv
itie
s in
clu
din
g w
eed
ing,
bio
logi
cal s
urv
eys
and
to
po
grap
hic
su
rvey
s to
co
mp
ly w
ith
reg
ula
tory
per
mit
co
nd
itio
ns.
Cap
10/7
/13
Yes
Yes
No
EN13
031
Win
evill
e P
roo
f o
f
Co
nce
pt
$300
,000
$0$3
00,0
00$1
25,0
00$4
25,0
00$2
00,0
00$1
25,0
00$3
25,0
00
(EN
0602
5)Tr
ansf
er f
rom
EN
0602
5 to
EN
1303
1 fo
r ad
dit
ion
al w
ork
act
ivit
ies
incl
ud
ing
wee
din
g, b
iolo
gica
l su
rvey
s
and
to
po
grap
hic
su
rvey
s to
co
mp
ly w
ith
reg
ula
tory
per
mit
co
nd
itio
ns.
Sub
tota
l No
n-R
ecla
imab
le W
ater
(N
C):
Inla
nd
Em
pir
e U
tilit
ies
Age
ncy
Ch
ange
s in
To
tal P
roje
ct B
ud
gets
Inte
r-D
epar
tmen
tal/
Div
isio
n T
ran
sfer
s FY
20
13
/14
Exh
ibit
D
Fu
nd
Cap
ital
or
Spec
Pro
j?D
ate
Tota
l Pro
j
Bu
dge
t C
han
ge
(Y/N
)?
An
nu
al P
roj
Bu
dge
t
Ch
ange
(Y/N
)?
Ne
w
Pro
j? Y
/N
Pro
ject
Nu
mb
erP
roje
ct T
itle
Ad
op
ted
To
tal
Pro
ject
Bu
dge
t
Pri
or
FY 2
013/
14
TP A
dju
stm
ents
Cu
rren
t To
tal
Pro
ject
Bu
dge
t
Am
t. o
f
Tran
sfer
In /
(Ou
t)
Ne
w T
P B
ud
get
FY 2
013/
14
An
nu
al P
roje
ct
Bu
dge
t
An
nu
al P
roj.
Bu
dge
t
Ch
ange
Ne
w A
nn
ual
Pro
ject
Bu
dge
t
Pro
ject
Tran
sfer
red
To/(
Fro
m)
Rea
son
Fo
r Tr
ansf
er
1060
0C
ap11
/4/1
3Ye
sYe
sN
oEN
0602
5W
inev
ille
Ext
RC
Pip
elin
e Se
g A
$18,
155
,518
($19
0,00
0)$1
7,96
5,51
8$0
$17,
965
,518
$7,8
10,0
00($
26,9
13)
$7,7
83,0
87
EN12
014
Tran
sfer
fro
m E
N06
025
to E
N12
014
to s
up
po
rt t
he
con
stru
ctio
n f
or
the
recy
cled
wat
er p
ipel
ine
relo
cati
on
. To
tal p
roje
ct b
ud
get
will
no
t ch
ange
.
Cap
11/4
/13
No
Yes
No
EN12
014
East
Ave
nu
e 16
30 E
RW
P R
elo
cati
on
$650
,108
$0$6
50,1
08$0
$650
,108
$470
,371
$26,
913
$497
,284
(E
N06
025)
Tran
sfer
fro
m E
N06
025
to E
N12
014
to s
up
po
rt t
he
con
stru
ctio
n f
or
the
recy
cled
wat
er p
ipel
ine
relo
cati
on
. To
tal p
roje
ct b
ud
get
will
no
t ch
ange
.
Cap
11/7
/13
Yes
Yes
Yes
EN12
019
GW
R &
RW
SC
AD
A
Syst
em U
pgr
ades
$2,5
26,3
90$0
$2,5
26,3
90($
932,
000)
$1,5
94,3
90$7
81,6
57($
136,
000)
$645
,657
EN
1404
7
Tota
l pro
ject
bu
dge
t tr
ansf
er o
f $9
32,0
00 f
rom
EN
1201
9 to
cre
ate
new
pro
ject
, EN
1404
7. A
nn
ual
bu
dge
t tr
ansf
er o
f $1
36,0
00 f
rom
EN
1201
9 to
EN
1404
7. T
he
reas
on
fo
r th
e tr
ansf
er is
to
ad
d f
un
din
g to
the
new
pro
ject
wh
ich
was
sep
arat
ed t
o a
dd
ress
tw
o p
roje
ct s
ched
ule
s.
Cap
11/7
/13
Yes
Yes
Yes
EN14
047
GW
R &
RW
SC
AD
A
Co
ntr
ol U
pgr
ades
$0$0
$0$9
32,0
00$9
32,0
00$0
$136
,000
$136
,000
(E
N12
019)
Tota
l pro
ject
bu
dge
t tr
ansf
er o
f $9
32,0
00 f
rom
EN
1201
9 to
cre
ate
new
pro
ject
, EN
1404
7. A
nn
ual
bu
dge
t tr
ansf
er o
f $1
36,0
00 f
rom
EN
1201
9 to
EN
1404
7. T
he
reas
on
fo
r th
e tr
ansf
er is
to
ad
d f
un
din
g to
the
new
pro
ject
wh
ich
was
sep
arat
ed t
o a
dd
ress
tw
o p
roje
ct s
ched
ule
s.
$84,
232
,670
$83,
577
,670
$37,
961
,862
$37,
961
,862
1080
0C
ap12
/16/
13Ye
sYe
sY
esEN
1402
1R
P-1
Sec
on
dar
y
Cla
rifi
er A
sset
Reh
ab$3
,680
,000
$0$3
,680
,000
($74
5,00
0)$2
,935
,000
$800
,000
($74
5,00
0)$5
5,00
0 EN
1405
2
Tota
l pro
ject
bu
dge
t tr
ansf
er a
nd
an
nu
al p
roje
ct b
ud
get
tran
sfer
of
$745
,000
fro
m E
N14
021
to c
reat
e
enw
pro
ject
, EN
1405
2. T
he
reas
on
fo
r th
e tr
ansf
er is
bec
ause
th
e as
sets
mu
st b
e re
pla
ced
as
the
curr
ent
stat
e o
f th
e as
set
has
rea
ched
th
e en
d o
f it
s u
sefu
l lif
e. T
he
fisc
al y
ear
allo
cati
on
un
der
EN
1402
1
will
be
use
d b
ecau
se M
ain
ten
ance
an
d O
per
atio
ns
staf
f d
eem
ed w
ork
un
nec
essa
ry a
fter
a s
erie
s o
f
inte
rnal
eva
luat
ion
s.
Cap
12/1
6/13
Yes
Yes
Yes
EN14
052
RP
-1 P
rim
ary
Cla
rifi
er
Wes
t Ef
flu
ent
Pip
elin
e
Rep
lace
men
t
$0$0
$0$7
45,0
00$7
45,0
00$0
$745
,000
$745
,000
(E
N14
021)
Tota
l pro
ject
bu
dge
t tr
ansf
er a
nd
an
nu
al p
roje
ct b
ud
get
tran
sfer
of
$745
,000
fro
m E
N14
021
to c
reat
e
enw
pro
ject
, EN
1405
2. T
he
reas
on
fo
r th
e tr
ansf
er is
bec
ause
th
e as
sets
mu
st b
e re
pla
ced
as
the
curr
ent
stat
e o
f th
e as
set
has
rea
ched
th
e en
d o
f it
s u
sefu
l lif
e. T
he
fisc
al y
ear
allo
cati
on
un
der
EN
1402
1
will
be
use
d b
ecau
se M
ain
ten
ance
an
d O
per
atio
ns
staf
f d
eem
ed w
ork
un
nec
essa
ry a
fter
a s
erie
s o
f
inte
rnal
eva
luat
ion
s.
$3,6
80,0
00$3
,680
,000
$800
,000
$800
,000
1090
0C
ap8/
13/1
3Ye
sYe
sN
oEN
1401
9R
P-1
Hea
dw
ork
s G
ate
Rep
lace
men
t$1
0,7
25,0
00$0
$10,
725,
000
($29
0,00
0)$1
0,4
35,0
00$7
25,0
00($
290,
000)
$435
,000
EN
1201
7/
EN12
021
Bu
dge
t tr
ansf
er f
rom
EN
1401
9 to
incr
ease
pro
ject
bu
dge
t EN
1201
7 an
d E
N12
021
to
ad
dre
ss a
dd
itio
nal
dra
inag
e im
pro
vem
ents
bec
ause
EN
1401
9 b
ud
get
will
no
t b
e fu
lly e
xpen
ded
th
is y
ear
sin
ce m
ajo
r
con
stru
ctio
n is
sch
edu
led
in f
ollo
win
g fi
scal
yea
rs.
Cap
8/13
/13
Yes
Yes
No
EN12
017
RP
-4 G
rad
ing
&
Dra
inag
e
Imp
rove
men
ts
$385
,000
$0$3
85,0
00$1
20,0
00$5
05,0
00$1
02,5
05$1
20,0
00$2
22,5
05
(EN
1401
9)
Bu
dge
t tr
ansf
er f
rom
EN
1401
9 to
incr
ease
pro
ject
bu
dge
t EN
1201
7 an
d E
N12
021
to
ad
dre
ss a
dd
itio
nal
dra
inag
e im
pro
vem
ents
bec
ause
EN
1401
9 b
ud
get
will
no
t b
e fu
lly e
xpen
ded
th
is y
ear
sin
ce m
ajo
r
con
stru
ctio
n is
sch
edu
led
in f
ollo
win
g fi
scal
yea
rs.
Cap
8/13
/13
Yes
Yes
No
EN12
021
RP
-5 P
on
d/D
rain
age
Imp
rove
men
ts$3
50,0
00$0
$350
,000
$170
,000
$520
,000
$304
,666
$170
,000
$474
,666
(E
N14
019)
Bu
dge
t tr
ansf
er f
rom
EN
1401
9 to
incr
ease
pro
ject
bu
dge
t EN
1201
7 an
d E
N12
021
to
ad
dre
ss a
dd
itio
nal
dra
inag
e im
pro
vem
ents
bec
ause
EN
1401
9 b
ud
get
will
no
t b
e fu
lly e
xpen
ded
th
is y
ear
sin
ce m
ajo
r
con
stru
ctio
n is
sch
edu
led
in f
ollo
win
g fi
scal
yea
rs.
Cap
8/22
/13
Yes
Yes
No
EN14
019
RP
-1 H
ead
wo
rks
Gat
e
Rep
lace
men
t$1
0,7
25,0
00($
290,
000)
$10,
435,
000
($22
5,00
0)$1
0,2
10,0
00$4
35,0
00($
225,
000)
$210
,000
EN
1201
7B
ud
get
tran
sfer
fro
m E
N14
019
to E
N12
017
to a
dd
ress
ad
dit
ion
al d
rain
age
imp
rovm
ents
Cap
8/22
/13
Yes
Yes
No
EN12
017
RP
-4 G
rad
ing
&
Dra
inag
e
Imp
rove
men
ts
$280
,000
$120
,000
$400
,000
$225
,000
$625
,000
$222
,505
$225
,000
$447
,505
(E
N14
019)
Bu
dge
t tr
ansf
er f
rom
EN
1401
9 to
EN
1201
7 to
ad
dre
ss a
dd
itio
nal
dra
inag
e im
pro
vmen
ts
Cap
9/17
/13
Yes
Yes
No
EN06
020
RP
-5 S
yste
m F
ac
Up
grad
e &
Imp
rv$2
9,7
76,6
48$0
$29,
776,
648
($55
8,92
6)$2
9,2
17,7
22$5
58,9
26($
558,
926)
$0
EN13
056
Bu
dge
t tr
ansf
er f
rom
EN
0602
0 to
EN
1305
6 to
co
mp
lete
th
e co
nst
ruct
ion
ph
ase
of
the
Age
ncy
-Wid
e
HV
AC
Imp
rove
men
ts -
Pck
g N
o. 2
, wh
ich
is c
urr
entl
y in
th
e fi
nal
des
ign
ph
ase
Cap
9/17
/13
Yes
Yes
No
EN13
056
Age
ncy
-Wid
e H
VA
C
Imp
rove
men
ts -
Pck
g
No
. 2
$100
,000
$0$1
00,0
00$5
58,9
26$6
58,9
26$1
00,0
00$5
58,9
26$6
58,9
26
(EN
0602
0)B
ud
get
tran
sfer
fro
m E
N06
020
to E
N13
056
to c
om
ple
te t
he
con
stru
ctio
n p
has
e o
f th
e A
gen
cy-W
ide
HV
AC
Imp
rove
men
ts -
Pck
g N
o. 2
, wh
ich
is c
urr
entl
y in
th
e fi
nal
des
ign
ph
ase
Sub
tota
l Rec
ycle
d W
ater
(W
C):
Sub
tota
l Reg
ion
al O
per
atio
ns
(RO
):
Inla
nd
Em
pir
e U
tilit
ies
Age
ncy
Ch
ange
s in
To
tal P
roje
ct B
ud
gets
Inte
r-D
epar
tmen
tal/
Div
isio
n T
ran
sfer
s FY
20
13
/14
Exh
ibit
D
Fu
nd
Cap
ital
or
Spec
Pro
j?D
ate
Tota
l Pro
j
Bu
dge
t C
han
ge
(Y/N
)?
An
nu
al P
roj
Bu
dge
t
Ch
ange
(Y/N
)?
Ne
w
Pro
j? Y
/N
Pro
ject
Nu
mb
erP
roje
ct T
itle
Ad
op
ted
To
tal
Pro
ject
Bu
dge
t
Pri
or
FY 2
013/
14
TP A
dju
stm
ents
Cu
rren
t To
tal
Pro
ject
Bu
dge
t
Am
t. o
f
Tran
sfer
In /
(Ou
t)
Ne
w T
P B
ud
get
FY 2
013/
14
An
nu
al P
roje
ct
Bu
dge
t
An
nu
al P
roj.
Bu
dge
t
Ch
ange
Ne
w A
nn
ual
Pro
ject
Bu
dge
t
Pro
ject
Tran
sfer
red
To/(
Fro
m)
Rea
son
Fo
r Tr
ansf
er
1090
0C
ap11
/4/1
3Ye
sYe
sN
oEN
1103
9R
P-1
Dis
infe
ctio
n P
um
p
Imp
rove
men
ts$6
00,0
00$0
$600
,000
($20
8,00
0)$3
92,0
00$5
31,1
17($
372,
352)
$158
,765
EN
1202
2
Tran
sfer
$37
2,35
2 fr
om
EN
1103
9 A
nn
ual
Bu
dge
t to
co
mp
lete
maj
or
con
stru
ctio
n o
f EN
1202
2 b
efo
re
Jun
e 20
14. T
ran
sfer
$20
8,00
0 fr
om
EN
1103
9 To
tal P
roje
ct B
ud
get
to E
N12
022
to a
dd
ress
th
e re
cen
t
chan
ges
in t
he
pro
ject
sco
pe
of
add
ing
actu
ato
rs a
nd
ad
dit
ion
al b
utt
erfl
y va
lves
to
elim
inat
e fu
ture
rep
lace
men
t an
d a
void
ad
dit
on
al p
roce
ss in
terr
up
tio
ns.
Cap
11/4
/13
Yes
Yes
No
EN12
022
RP
-1 A
erat
ion
Du
ctin
g
Rep
air
Pro
ject
$1,0
48,0
00$0
$1,0
48,0
00$2
08,0
00$1
,256
,000
$848
,000
$372
,352
$1,2
20,3
52
(EN
1103
9)
Tran
sfer
$37
2,35
2 fr
om
EN
1103
9 A
nn
ual
Bu
dge
t to
co
mp
lete
maj
or
con
stru
ctio
n o
f EN
1202
2 b
efo
re
Jun
e 20
14. T
ran
sfer
$20
8,00
0 fr
om
EN
1103
9 To
tal P
roje
ct B
ud
get
to E
N12
022
to a
dd
ress
th
e re
cen
t
chan
ges
in t
he
pro
ject
sco
pe
of
add
ing
actu
ato
rs a
nd
ad
dit
ion
al b
utt
erfl
y va
lves
to
elim
inat
e fu
ture
rep
lace
men
t an
d a
void
ad
dit
on
al p
roce
ss in
terr
up
tio
ns.
Cap
12/5
/13
Yes
Yes
Yes
EN14
037
Sew
er M
anh
ole
s
Reh
abili
tait
on
$1,9
00,0
00$0
$1,9
00,0
00($
75,0
00)
$1,8
25,0
00$2
00,0
00($
75,0
00)
$125
,000
EN
1405
0
Tran
sfer
$75
,000
fro
m E
N14
037
An
nu
al a
nd
To
tal P
roje
ct B
ud
get
to c
reat
e n
ew p
roje
ct, E
N14
050,
Co
llect
ion
Sys
tem
Rea
pir
s P
has
e V
, Wes
tsid
e In
terc
epto
r. U
rgen
t re
pai
rs r
equ
ired
. To
tal p
roje
ct
bu
dge
t fo
r EN
1405
0 w
ill b
e $5
75,0
00 w
ith
$75
,000
use
d in
FY1
3/14
.
Cap
12/5
/13
Yes
Yes
Yes
EN14
050
Co
llect
ion
Sys
tem
Rep
airs
Ph
ase
V,
Wes
tsid
e In
terc
epto
r
$0$0
$0$7
5,00
0$7
5,0
00$0
$75,
000
$75,
000
(EN
1403
7)
Tran
sfer
$75
,000
fro
m E
N14
037
An
nu
al a
nd
To
tal P
roje
ct B
ud
get
to c
reat
e n
ew p
roje
ct, E
N14
050,
Co
llect
ion
Sys
tem
Rea
pir
s P
has
e V
, Wes
tsid
e In
terc
epto
r. U
rgen
t re
pai
rs r
equ
ired
. To
tal p
roje
ct
bu
dge
t fo
r EN
1405
0 w
ill b
e $5
75,0
00 w
ith
$75
,000
use
d in
FY1
3/14
.
$55,
889
,648
$55,
719
,648
$4,0
27,7
19$4
,027
,719
Ad
op
ted
Am
end
edA
do
pte
dA
men
ded
$144
,315
,318
$14
3,4
90,3
18$4
3,1
60,2
44$4
3,1
60,2
44
1060
0Sp
ec11
/14/
13Ye
sYe
sY
esEN
1404
8R
W A
V R
elo
cati
on
ove
r
Dee
r C
ree
k C
han
nel
$0$0
$0$1
6,00
0$1
6,0
00$0
$16,
000
$16,
000
(O&
M)
Tran
sfer
fro
m O
& M
acc
ou
nt
to
EN
1404
8, R
W A
V R
elo
cati
on
ove
r D
eer
Cre
ek
Ch
ann
el, t
o a
llow
fo
r
relo
cati
on
of
exis
tin
g re
cycl
ed w
ater
air
rel
ease
/vac
uu
m r
elie
f va
lve.
Spec
11/2
0/13
Yes
Yes
Yes
EN14
029
WC
Ass
et
Man
agem
ent
Pro
ject
s$2
,500
,000
$0$2
,500
,000
($20
,000
)$2
,480
,000
$250
,000
($20
,000
)$2
30,0
00
EN14
049
Tran
sfer
fro
m E
N14
029
to c
reat
e n
ew p
roje
ct, E
N14
049,
to
cre
ate
an O
&M
man
ual
fo
r o
per
aito
n o
f th
e
pre
ssu
re r
edu
cin
g va
lve
bet
wee
n 1
158
and
105
0 R
ecyc
led
Wat
er P
ress
ure
Zo
nes
. Th
e O
&M
man
ual
will
pro
vid
e es
sen
tial
op
erat
ing
pro
ced
ure
s to
Op
erat
ion
s St
aff.
Th
e to
tal b
ud
get
for
this
pro
ject
is $
20,0
00.
Spec
11/2
0/13
Yes
Yes
Yes
EN14
049
SOP
fo
r 11
58/1
050
RW
Pre
ssu
re Z
on
es P
RV
$0$0
$0$2
0,00
0$2
0,0
00$0
$20,
000
$20,
000
(EN
1402
9)
Tran
sfer
fro
m E
N14
029
to c
reat
e n
ew p
roje
ct, E
N14
049,
to
cre
ate
an O
&M
man
ual
fo
r o
per
aito
n o
f th
e
pre
ssu
re r
edu
cin
g va
lve
bet
wee
n 1
158
and
105
0 R
ecyc
led
Wat
er P
ress
ure
Zo
nes
. Th
e O
&M
man
ual
will
pro
vid
e es
sen
tial
op
erat
ing
pro
ced
ure
s to
Op
erat
ion
s St
aff.
Th
e to
tal b
ud
get
for
this
pro
ject
is $
20,0
00.
Spec
12/3
1/13
Yes
Yes
No
EN14
048
RW
AV
Rel
oca
tio
n o
ver
Dee
r C
ree
k C
han
nel
$0$1
6,00
0$1
6,00
0$7
,000
$23,
000
$16,
000
$7,0
00$2
3,00
0 (O
&M
)
Tran
sfer
fro
m O
& M
acc
ou
nt
to
EN
1404
8, R
W A
V R
elo
cati
on
ove
r D
eer
Cre
ek
Ch
ann
el, t
o e
stab
lish
ed
to r
elo
cate
exi
stin
g re
cycl
ed w
ater
air
rel
ease
/vac
uu
m r
elie
f va
lve.
Aft
er t
he
pre
-bid
job
wal
k, t
he
sco
pe
of
wo
rk w
as e
xpan
ded
by
Age
ncy
sta
ff t
o a
dd
res
add
ito
nal
mai
nte
nan
ce n
eed
s.
$2,5
00,0
00$2
,539
,000
$266
,000
$289
,000
1090
0Sp
ec7/
30/1
3Ye
sYe
sN
oP
L050
07Fa
cilit
ies
Pla
nn
ing
$558
,449
$0$5
58,4
49($
143,
325)
$415
,124
$147
,416
($14
3,32
5)$4
,091
W
R14
003
Rem
ain
ing
fun
ds
of
PL0
5007
are
nee
ded
to
co
mp
lete
th
e cu
rren
t co
mp
reh
ensi
ve M
aste
r P
lan
Up
dat
e,
tran
sfer
red
to
WR
1400
3
Spec
7/30
/13
Yes
Yes
No
WR
1400
3W
aste
wat
er F
acili
ties
Up
grad
e an
d C
EQA
$300
,000
$0$3
00,0
00$1
43,3
25$4
43,3
25$1
50,0
00$1
43,3
25$2
93,3
25(P
L050
07)
Rem
ain
ing
fun
ds
of
PL0
5007
are
nee
ded
to
co
mp
lete
th
e cu
rren
t co
mp
reh
ensi
ve M
aste
r P
lan
Up
dat
e,
tran
sfer
red
to
WR
1400
3
$858
,449
$858
,449
$297
,416
$297
,416
Ad
op
ted
Am
end
edA
do
pte
dA
men
ded
$3,3
58,4
49$3
,397
,449
$563
,416
$586
,416
Tota
l An
nu
al C
apit
al B
ud
get
Tota
l An
nu
al S
pec
ial B
ud
get
Spec
ial T
ota
l Pro
ject
Bu
dge
t
Cap
ital
To
tal P
roje
ct B
ud
get
Cap
ital
To
tal P
roje
ct B
ud
get
Spec
ial T
ota
l Pro
ject
Bu
dge
t
Sub
tota
l Rec
ycle
d W
ater
(W
C):
Sub
tota
l Reg
ion
al C
apit
al (
RC
):
Sub
tota
l Reg
ion
al C
apit
al (
RC
):
FY
2
01
3/1
4
2nd Q
uarter B
ud
ge
t V
aria
nc
e R
epo
rt
Bo
ard
o
f D
ire
ctors
February 19, 2014
N
ew
ED
U C
on
ne
cti
on
Fe
es
- $
3.7
M, 4
0.6
% o
f a
me
nd
ed
bu
dg
et
7
32 n
ew
connections c
om
pare
d t
o b
udgete
d 1
,800 u
nits.
R
ec
yc
led
Wa
ter
Sa
les
– $
5.2
M, 7
2.8
% o
f a
me
nd
ed
bu
dg
et
21,6
12 A
F o
f pro
duction v
s.
31,4
00 A
FY
am
ended b
udget
14,2
35 A
F o
f direct, a
nd 7
,377 A
F o
f re
charg
e s
ale
s
G
ran
t an
d L
oan
Pro
ceed
s -
$6.5
M, 20.6
% o
f am
ended b
udget
$5.0
M,
22%
SR
F L
oan p
roceeds f
or
the R
ecycle
d W
ate
r S
outh
ern
Are
a
$1.5
M,
17%
of budgete
d g
rants
receip
ts
2
Reve
nu
e H
ig
hlig
hts
Ac
tu
al vs. A
me
nd
ed
B
udg
et
E
mp
loym
en
t -
$1
7.0
M, 4
8.1
% o
f a
me
nd
ed
bu
dg
et
W
eig
hte
d a
vera
ge v
acancy f
acto
r of
11.2
%,
or
33 F
TE
’s, slig
htly a
bove
the 5
% A
gency t
arg
et
vacancy f
acto
r
U
tili
ties -
$4
.9M
, 5
1.4
% o
f a
me
nd
ed
bu
dg
et
In
cre
ased S
CE
usage d
ue t
o s
easonal fluctu
ations o
f dem
and in t
he
sum
mer
and e
arly w
inte
r m
onth
s c
om
bin
ed w
ith a
seasonal in
cre
ase in
rate
s.
C
ap
ital
- $15.2
M, 20
.8%
of
am
en
ded
bu
dg
et
D
ela
ys in c
onstr
uction f
or
severa
l pro
jects
due p
erm
it d
ela
ys,
scope o
f
work
changes,
and d
esig
n d
ela
ys.
3
Exp
en
se
H
ig
hlig
hts
Ac
tu
al vs. A
me
nd
ed
B
udg
et
FY
2
01
3/1
4 O
pe
ratin
g &
No
n-O
pe
ratin
g N
et D
ec
re
ase
($
Millio
ns)
Op
era
tin
g
FY 2
01
3/1
4
Am
en
de
d B
ud
get
Qu
arte
r
End
ed
12
/31
/13
A
ctu
al %
of
A
me
nd
ed
Op
erat
ing
Rev
enu
e
$7
5.6
$
37
.3
49
.3%
Op
erat
ing
Exp
ense
$
82
.4*
$3
5.4
4
2.9
%
Op
era
tin
g N
et In
cre
ase
(D
ecr
eas
e)
($6
.8)
$1
.9
No
n-O
pe
rati
ng
FY 2
01
3/1
4
Am
en
de
d B
ud
get
Qu
arte
r
End
ed
12
/31
/13
A
ctu
al %
of
A
me
nd
ed
No
n-O
per
atin
g R
even
ue
$
75
.5
$2
4.2
3
2.0
%
No
n-O
per
atin
g Ex
pen
se
$9
5.6
* $
25
.8
26
.9%
No
n-O
pe
rati
ng
Net
In
cre
ase
(D
ecr
eas
e)
($2
0.1
) ($
1.6
)
Tota
l Net
Incr
eas
e
(De
cre
ase
) ($
26
.9)
$0
.3
4
FY
2
01
3/1
4 E
nc
um
bra
nc
e R
etu
rn
($
Millio
ns)
5
Cap
ital
&
Spe
cial
P
roje
cts
O&
M
Tota
l
Car
ried
Fo
rwar
d –
Sep
tem
ber
20
13
$
6.6
$
1.9
$
8.5
Encu
mb
ran
ce R
etu
rn –
Jan
uar
y 2
01
4
($1
.1)
($0
.4)
($1
.5)
Tota
l Use
d o
r R
em
ain
ing
Encu
mb
ran
ce
$5
.5
$1
.5
$7
.0
QU
ES
TIO
NS
?
6
INFORMATION ITEM
3B
G:\PP\Technical and Policy Committee\2014\02-27-14 Tech\Financial Update - Budget Workshop No. 2.docx
Date: February 27, 2014
To: Regional Technical Committee
From: Inland Empire Utilities Agency
Subject: Financial Update
RECOMMENDATION
This is an informational item for the Regional Technical Committee to receive and file.
BACKGROUND
This item was presented at the IEUA Board of Directors meeting on February 5, 2014.
Date: February 5, 2014
To: The Honorable Board of Directors
From: P. Joseph Grindstaff
General Manager
Submitted by: Christina Valencia
Chief Financial Officer/Assistant General Manager
Javier Chagoyen-Lazaro
Manager of Finance and Accounting
Subject: FY 2014/15 Budget Workshop #2: Challenges, Opportunities & Strategies
RECOMMENDATION
This is an informational item for the Board of Directors to review.
BACKGROUND
On January 22, 2014 the Agency’s Board of Directors held the first of three budget workshops. As
summarized in the FY 2014/15 Budget Workshop Outline (Appendix A), management provided an
overview of the Agency’s current financial position and presented the proposed long term,
intermediate and immediate Business Goals relative to Fiscal Responsibility. A key recommendation
by the Board was the payment of long term liabilities. These long term obligations include: high
interest bonds and unfunded accrued liabilities (UALs) for retirement benefits. Early repayment of
high interest bonds and a reduction in UALs will help support another key recommendation from the
Board: improvement of the Agency’s total debt coverage ratio (DCR) to 3.0X and achieve AAA
credit rating sooner than FY 2017/18. The approved fiscal goals, as summarized in Appendix B will
serve as the framework in the development of the FY 2014/15 budget and ensuing year forecasts.
Today’s workshop will focus on the anticipated challenges and opportunities and the financial
policies and strategies necessary to achieve the approved fiscal goals. Discussion is expected to
identify key assumptions for the development of budget scenarios for review and evaluation.
Challenges and Opportunities
Sources of funds
A key opportunity is the recent improvement in economic conditions throughout the Agency’s
service area. Along with the upsurge in new EDU connection fees resulting from the recovery of the
housing industry, property tax receipts are also expected to increase in the current fiscal year. In July
2013, the San Bernardino Tax Assessor estimated an average increase of 3 percent in assessed
property values across the county. Adding to the Agency’s revenue base is implementation of the last
FY 2014/15 Budget Workshop #2
February 5, 2014
Page 2 of 9
G:\PP\Technical and Policy Committee\2014\02-27-14 Tech\14032 Budget Workshop No 2_20140205 Draft v1.docx
of a three year rate increase adopted by the Board in February 2012 for the Regional Wastewater and
Recycled Water programs.
Despite the increase in some of the major revenue sources, a key challenge is still the achievement of
full cost of service rates for all Agency programs as defined in the Agency’s Long Range Plan of
Finance (2007). While the multi-year rate increases have narrowed the gap between program
revenues and costs; a structural deficit still exists. Achieving rates that fully cover operating and
replacement and rehabilitation (R&R) costs is essential to ensuring a reliable and high quality level of
service. As the Agency moves beyond the three year adopted rates, future rate structures that support
full cost of service will continue to be a high priority to ensure the Agency’s financial health.
Continuing the practice of adopting multiyear rate increases will also support the Agency’s transition
to a biennial budget in FY 2015/16, as well as provide member agencies more stability in their
financial planning.
Uses of funds
Through continual cost containment efforts implemented in FY 2008/09 in response to the economic
downturn, and despite significant increases in energy and employment costs, operating costs have
been sustained at a FY 2007/08 level. Offsetting these increases has been a reduction in the number
of authorized full time equivalent (FTE) positions, primarily through attrition, from a high of 308 in
FY 2007/08 to 295 in FY 2013/14. Another reduction in the number of authorized FTE positions
from 295 to 290 is proposed for FY 2014/15 while still maintaining a vacancy factor of five (5)
percent (equivalent to 15 FTEs). Also contributing to cost containment has been the pension reform
negotiated with the various employee bargaining units. Beginning in October 2011, employees began
paying two (2) percent of the Employer Paid Member Contribution (EPMC). As part of the recently
negotiated Memorandum of Understanding (MOUs), employees will assume the full EPMC, or eight
(8) percent, by the end of the five year term.
A shift from expansion to R&R beginning in 2008 has also attributed to significantly reduced capital
improvement plan (CIP) costs. The only exception being construction of the Agency’s Recycled
Water Distribution System (RWDS) which has been in an accelerated construction mode since the
adoption of the Recycled Water Business Plan in 2007. With the economy now showing signs of
recovery, a key drive for the Agency’s CIP will be reinstatement of some of the deferred projects to
ensure facilities are expanded to meet the anticipated future growth. To more accurately identify
these requirements, the Agency is in the process of updating long term planning documents,
including: Ten Year CIP, Asset Management Plan, Integrated Resources Plan, Recycled Water Plan,
Long Range Plan of Finance, Wastewater Facilities Master Plan, and Energy Plan, (Appendix C).
Effectively leveraging these opportunities to mitigate the anticipated challenges will help to position
the Agency’s fiscal health to more effectively meet its short and long term goals.
Strategies
Another key portion of the discussion will be defining the strategies necessary to achieve the Board’s
goals and objectives. Some of the major strategies include:
Sound and prudent long term planning to provide for:
FY 2014/15 Budget Workshop #2
February 5, 2014
Page 3 of 9
G:\PP\Technical and Policy Committee\2014\02-27-14 Tech\14032 Budget Workshop No 2_20140205 Draft v1.docx
o Adoption of multiyear budget and rates
o Full cost of service recovery through rates
o Timely investment in resources to support future demands
o Payment of retirement unfunded liabilities
o Early payment of high interest bonds
Refinement of financial policies and thresholds
o Define the right level of reserves for each category by fund
o Optimize use of property taxes
o Balance funding of CIP with PAYGO and new debt
o Use of non-recurring revenues
The discussion and refinement of these strategies will guide the development of budget scenarios to
be presented at the final workshop on March 5, 2014.
PRIOR BOARD ACTION
On October 16, 2013 the Board of Directors approved the IEUA Business Goals.
IMPACT ON BUDGET
None.
FY 2014/15 Budget Workshop #2
February 5, 2014
Page 4 of 9
G:\PP\Technical and Policy Committee\2014\02-27-14 Tech\14032 Budget Workshop No 2_20140205 Draft v1.docx
Appendix A – FY 2014/15 Budget Workshop Outline
WORKSHOP 1: FINANCIAL POSITION AND PROPOSED GOALS
January 22, 2014
1. Financial position overview
a. Key drivers
b. Trend in in total funding sources and uses of funds
c. Trend in total fund reserve balances and debt coverage ratio
2. Agency Business Goals: Fiscal Responsibility
a. Long term goals: > 5 years
b. Intermediate term goals: 2 to 5 years
c. Immediate goals: FY 2014/15 Budget
WORKSHOP 2: Challenges, Opportunities & Strategies
February 5, 2014
1. Challenges & opportunities related to funding sources
a. Economic recovery
b. Stable and reliable funding sources
c. New borrowings to support capital investment
2. Challenges and opportunities related to uses of funds
a. Cost containment – “doing more with less”
b. Succession planning and investment in employee development
c. Long term planning to support operational and capital requirements
3. Strategies
a. Adoption of multi-year budgets and rates
b. Sustainment of full cost of service for all programs
c. Reallocation of property taxes
d. Funding of CIP through combination of PAYGO and new debt
e. Prudent long term planning for financial, capital, employees, and regional water
resources
f. Establishment of financial policies and fund reserve thresholds
g. Improvement of the Agency’s financial condition
h. Renew Regional Sewage Service Contract
i. Predefinition of budget scenarios
WORKSHOP 3: FINANCIAL POLICIES AND BUDGET SCENARIOS
March 5, 2014
1. Financial policies consensus and threshold definitions
2. Long Range Plan of Finance Model: Budget Scenarios analysis
3. Other key areas identified in prior workshop
FY 2014/15 Budget Workshop #2
February 5, 2014
Page 5 of 9
G:\PP\Technical and Policy Committee\2014\02-27-14 Tech\14032 Budget Workshop No 2_20140205 Draft v1.docx
WORKSHOP 4: COMPILE AND SUMMARIZE POLICY DECISIONS
April 2, 2014
1. Funding plans for long term obligations and key initiatives
2. Financial policies and reserve threshold targets
3. FY 2014/15 Preliminary budget overview
FY 2014/15 Budget Workshop #2
February 5, 2014
Page 6 of 9
G:\PP\Technical and Policy Committee\2014\02-27-14 Tech\14032 Budget Workshop No 2_20140205 Draft v1.docx
Appendix B: Agency Business Goals
Summary of Budget Workshop #1
FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY: BUSINESS GOALS
LONG TERM
> 5 years
INTERMEDIATE TERM
2-5yrs
IMMEDIATE TERM 1 year
• Sustain Full Cost
of Service
• Transition to biennial budget
and adopt multi-year rates
• Achieve Full Cost of Service
rates for all Agency
programs
• Implement adopted multi-year
rates Implement new NRW
North system rate structure
• Improve budget forecasts
• Continue cost containment
• Instill Lean management
principles
• Sustain AAA
credit rating and
3.00 DCR
• Achieve AAA credit rating
by FY 2017 or sooner
• Refine reserve policies
• Begin paying unfunded
liabilities
• Pay down high interest debt
• Fully fund
unfunded
liabilities
• Pay 100% of OPEB accrued
unfunded liability
• Implement plan to fully pay
unfunded liabilities
• Pay 50% of OPEB accrued
unfunded liability
• Establish a plan to fully pay
unfunded liabilities
• Fully fund
annual PAYGO
requirements
• Establish a PAYGO policy
for R&R and portion of CIP
• Adopt FY 2015-2024 TYCIP
inclusive of Asset Management
Plan
• Maintain
established
reserves
• Allocate property taxes to
support water resources
• Increase reserves by $15
million per year
• Refine reserve policies and
establish appropriate thresholds
FY 2014/15 Budget Workshop #2
February 5, 2014
Page 7 of 9
G:\PP\Technical and Policy Committee\2014\02-27-14 Tech\14032 Budget Workshop No 2_20140205 Draft v1.docx
APPENDIX C: Long Term Planning Documents
FY 2014/15 Budget Workshop #2
February 5, 2014
Page 8 of 9
G:\PP\Technical and Policy Committee\2014\02-27-14 Tech\14032 Budget Workshop No 2_20140205 Draft v1.docx
Appendix D – Agency Program Rates
Program Rate
FY 2012/13 Effective
July 1, 2012
FY 2013/14 Effective
July 1, 2013
FY 2014/15 Effective
July 1, 2014
Regional Wastewater*
Monthly EDU Volumetric Fee
$12.39 $13.39 $14.39
New Per EDU Connection Fee
$4,909 $5,007 $5,107
Recycled Water*
Direct Delivery Rate Per AF
$155 $215 $290
Groundwater Recharge Per AF
$195 $255 $335
Imported Water Surcharge
Per AF $12 $13 TBD
Imported Water Rate**
Tier 1 Per AF
$560 January 1, 2012
$593 January 1, 2013
$593 January 1, 2014
$593 January 1, 2013
$593 January 1, 2014
TBD
Tier 2 Per AF
$686 January 1, 2012
$743 January 1, 2013
$593 January 1, 2014
$743 January 1, 2013
$735 January 1, 2014
TBD
FY 2014/15 Budget Workshop #2
February 5, 2014
Page 9 of 9
G:\PP\Technical and Policy Committee\2014\02-27-14 Tech\14032 Budget Workshop No 2_20140205 Draft v1.docx
Appendix E – Acronyms
AF – Acre Foot
CIP - Capital Improvement Program/Projects
Comm. Paper – Commercial Paper
DCR - Debt Coverage Ratio
EDU - Equivalent Dwelling Unit
EPMC – Employer Paid Member Contribution
FY – Fiscal Year
HQ - Headquarters (buildings A and B)
IRP – Integrated Resources Plan
LRPF – Long Range Plan of Finance
O&M - Operation and Maintenance
R&R - Repair and Rehabilitation, also Repair and Replacement
RDA - Redevelopment Agencies
RP-1 - Regional Water Recycling Plant #1
RP-4 - Regional Water Recycling Plant #4
RP-5 - Regional Water Recycling Plant #5
RWDS –Recycled Water Distribution System
SRF – State Revolving Fund (loans)
TYCIP – Ten Year Capital Improvement Plan
UAL - Unfunded Accrued Liabilities
FY
2
01
4/1
5
Bu
dg
et W
ork
sh
op
#2
Bo
ard
o
f D
ire
cto
rs
Feb
ru
ary 5
, 20
14
F
un
din
g S
ou
rce
s:
Ch
all
en
ge
s a
nd
Op
po
rtu
nit
ies
•E
conom
ic R
ecovery
•S
table
and R
elia
ble
Fu
ndin
g S
ourc
es
•N
ew
Borr
ow
ings
U
ses
of
Fu
nd
s:
Ch
all
en
ges a
nd
Op
po
rtu
nit
ies
•C
ost
Conta
inm
ent
•S
uccessio
n P
lannin
g &
Investm
ent
in E
mplo
yee D
evelo
pm
ent
•L
ong T
erm
Pla
nnin
g:
Opera
tional and C
apital R
equirem
ents
S
trate
gie
s
•L
ong T
erm
Pla
nnin
g:
Docum
ents
and E
xecution
•F
inancia
l P
olic
ies
•B
udget
Scenarios
2
Age
nd
a
3
HIG
HL
IG
HT
S W
OR
KS
HO
P 1
C
OM
MIT
ME
NT
TO
RE
CO
VE
R F
UL
L C
OS
T O
F S
ER
VIC
E
IN
CR
EA
SE
DE
BT
CO
VE
RA
GE
RA
TIO
to
3.0
0x
.
A
CH
IEV
E A
AA
RA
TIN
G B
Y 2
01
7/1
8 O
R S
OO
NE
R.
U
NF
UN
DE
D L
IAB
ILIT
ES
:
–O
PE
B, p
ay 1
00%
of
un
fun
ded
lia
bil
itie
s in
5 y
ears
–R
ET
IRE
ME
NT,
Defi
ne a
pla
n t
o p
ay u
nfu
nd
ed
lia
bil
itie
s in
10 y
ears
.
D
EV
EL
OP
A P
AY
GO
PO
LIC
Y F
OR
R&
R P
RO
JE
CT
S.
D
EF
INE
RE
SE
RV
ES
PO
LIC
Y T
O A
LL
OW
IN
FL
AT
ION
AD
JU
ST
ME
NT
S O
N R
ES
ER
VE
TH
RE
SH
OL
DS
.
FISC
AL
RES
PO
NSI
BIL
ITY:
BU
SIN
ESS
GO
ALS
LON
G T
ERM
>
5 y
ear
s IN
TER
MED
IATE
TER
M
2-5
yrs
IMM
EDIA
TE T
ERM
1 y
ear
•Su
stai
n F
ull
Co
st o
f Se
rvic
e •
Tran
siti
on
to
bie
nn
ial b
ud
get
and
ad
op
t m
ult
i-ye
ar r
ates
•
Ach
ieve
Fu
ll C
ost
of
Serv
ice
rate
s fo
r al
l Age
ncy
pro
gram
s
•Im
ple
men
t ad
op
ted
mu
lti-
year
rat
es
Imp
lem
ent
new
NR
W N
ort
h s
yste
m
rate
str
uct
ure
•
Imp
rove
bu
dge
t f
ore
cast
s •
Co
nti
nu
e co
st c
on
tain
men
t
•In
still
Lea
n m
anag
emen
t p
rin
cip
les
•Su
stai
n A
AA
cre
dit
ra
tin
g an
d 3
.0 D
CR
•
Ach
ieve
AA
A c
red
it r
atin
g b
y
FY 2
01
7/1
8 o
r so
on
er
•R
efin
e re
serv
e p
olic
ies
•B
egin
pay
ing
un
fun
ded
liab
iliti
es
•Pa
y d
ow
n h
igh
inte
rest
deb
t
•Fu
lly f
un
d u
nfu
nd
ed
liab
iliti
es
•Pa
y 1
00
% o
f O
PEB
acc
rued
u
nfu
nd
ed li
abili
ty
•Im
ple
men
t p
lan
to
fu
lly p
ay
un
fun
ded
liab
iliti
es
•Pa
y 5
0%
of
OP
EB a
ccru
ed u
nfu
nd
ed
liab
ility
•
Esta
blis
h a
pla
n t
o f
ully
pay
u
nfu
nd
ed li
abili
ties
•Fu
lly f
un
d a
nn
ual
PA
YGO
req
uir
emen
ts
•Es
tab
lish
a P
AYG
O p
olic
y fo
r R
&R
an
d p
ort
ion
of
CIP
•
Ad
op
t FY
20
15
-20
24
TYC
IP in
clu
sive
o
f A
sset
Man
agem
ent
Pla
n
•M
ain
tain
est
ablis
hed
re
serv
es
•A
lloca
te p
rop
erty
tax
es t
o
sup
po
rt w
ater
res
ou
rces
•
Incr
ease
res
erve
s b
y $
15
mill
ion
p
er y
ear
•R
efin
e re
serv
e p
olic
ies
and
est
ablis
h
app
rop
riat
e th
resh
old
s
4
SU
MM
AR
Y W
OR
KS
HO
P 1
CH
AL
LE
NG
ES
&
O
PP
OR
TU
NIT
IE
S
EC
ON
OM
IC
E
NV
IR
ON
ME
NT
FU
ND
IN
G S
OU
RC
ES
US
ES
O
F F
UN
DS
5
6
FAC
TOR
S C
HA
LLEN
GES
O
PP
OR
TUN
ITIE
S
ECO
NO
MIC
•
Un
kno
wn
pac
e an
d d
ura
tio
n o
f re
cove
ry
•FE
D a
lrea
dy
pu
llin
g b
ack
form
mar
kets
•
Stat
e fi
scal
sta
tus
and
un
cert
ain
ty o
f fu
ture
tax
sh
ifts
•
LEG
AL:
Tax
exe
mp
tio
n f
or
Bo
nd
s
•Le
vera
ge h
igh
er f
un
din
g so
urc
es
to im
pro
ve A
gen
cy’s
fin
anci
al
po
siti
on
•
His
tori
cally
low
inte
rest
rat
es
•R
edu
ce r
elia
nce
on
pro
per
ty
taxe
s
UR
BA
N
DEV
ELO
PM
ENT
•Su
stai
nin
g le
vel o
f se
rvic
e a
s d
eman
d
gro
ws
•Ti
mel
y ex
pan
sio
n o
f ex
isti
ng
faci
litie
s
•H
igh
er C
on
nec
tio
n F
ees
•H
igh
er P
rop
erty
Tax
Rec
eip
ts
ENV
IRO
NM
ENTA
L •
Seve
rity
an
d d
ura
tio
n o
f cu
rren
t d
rou
ght
•M
ore
str
inge
nt
regu
lati
on
s
•In
vest
in s
up
ple
men
tal a
nd
loca
l w
ater
res
ou
rces
•
Focu
s o
n e
ner
gy e
ffic
ien
cy
SUC
CES
SIO
N
PLA
NN
ING
•
Imp
end
ing
reti
rem
ent
of
“bab
y b
oo
mer
s”
•Lo
ss o
f in
stit
uti
on
al k
no
wle
dge
•If
do
ne
rig
ht
ensu
re lo
ng
term
su
cces
s o
f th
e A
gen
cy
REG
ION
AL
SEW
AG
E C
ON
TRA
CT
•R
equ
ired
allo
cati
on
of
65
% o
f p
rop
erty
tax
es t
o R
C F
un
d
•B
egin
neg
oti
atio
ns
to u
pd
ate
con
trac
t
CH
AL
LE
NG
ES
A
ND
OP
PO
RT
UN
IT
IE
S
7
FUN
DIN
G S
OU
RC
ES
CH
ALL
ENG
ES
OP
PO
RTU
NIT
IES
Was
tew
ate
r an
d
Re
cycl
ed
Wat
er
pro
gram
rat
es
•FY
20
14
/15
rat
es a
lrea
dy
ado
pte
d
•St
ill h
ave
no
t ac
hie
ved
fu
ll co
st o
f se
rvic
e
•C
on
tin
ued
incr
ease
in r
ecyc
led
w
ater
del
iver
ies
•St
ead
y gr
ow
th o
f ED
U v
olu
met
ric
un
its
Pro
pe
rty
taxe
s •
Rea
lloca
tio
n o
f u
se li
mit
ed b
y R
egio
nal
Sew
age
Co
ntr
act
•U
nce
rtai
nty
of
futu
re s
hif
ts b
y St
ate
•R
ise
in p
rop
erty
ass
esse
d v
alu
es
•Su
rge
in n
ew d
evel
op
men
t
•H
igh
er “
pas
s-th
rou
gh”
RD
A
pay
men
ts s
ince
dis
solu
tio
n
Co
nn
ect
ion
fe
es
•Li
nke
d t
o e
con
om
ic c
ycle
•
Rel
iab
ility
of
pro
ject
ion
s •
Rat
e in
crea
ses
limit
ed t
o E
NR
ind
ex
•Su
rge
in n
ew d
evel
op
men
t
•U
rban
dev
elo
pm
ent
•C
an b
e u
se f
or
deb
t re
dem
pti
on
Gra
nts
•
Hig
hly
co
mp
etit
ive
•
Lin
ked
to
pro
ject
exe
cuti
on
•
Ad
min
istr
ativ
e re
qu
irem
ents
•R
edu
ce c
ost
of
cap
ital
inve
stm
ent
•P
rom
ote
reg
ion
al c
olla
bo
rati
on
New
de
bt
bo
rro
win
gs
•H
igh
er f
utu
re in
tere
st r
ates
•
Imp
act
on
DC
R a
nd
cre
dit
qu
alit
y •
Cu
rren
t lo
w in
tere
st r
ate
envi
ron
men
t
CH
ALL
EN
GE
S A
ND
OP
PO
RT
UN
IT
IE
S
8
USE
S O
F FU
ND
S C
HA
LLEN
GES
O
PP
OR
TUN
ITIE
S
Op
era
tin
g (O
&M
) C
ost
s •
Emp
loye
es U
nit
s M
OU
’s
•C
lass
an
d C
om
pen
sati
on
stu
dy
•G
row
ing
un
fun
ded
liab
iliti
es
•Fu
ture
en
ergy
an
d c
hem
ical
co
sts
•P
red
icta
bili
ty o
f 5
yea
r M
OU
’s
•D
evel
op
ing
a fu
nd
ing
pla
n f
or
un
fun
ded
liab
iliti
es
•C
on
tin
ued
co
st c
on
tain
men
t
•Fo
cus
on
en
ergy
eff
icie
ncy
De
bt
Serv
ice
•
Hig
h le
vel o
f o
uts
tan
din
g d
ebt
•R
isin
g an
nu
al d
ebt
serv
ice
cost
s •
Rep
aym
ent
of
inte
r fu
nd
loan
s
•R
efu
nd
ing
of
hig
h in
tere
st r
ate
bo
nd
s •
Low
inte
rest
, 30
yea
r te
rm S
RF
loan
s
Cap
ital
Imp
rove
me
nt
Pla
n (
CIP
) •
Sust
ain
leve
l of
serv
ice:
•
Tim
ely
exp
ansi
on
to
mee
t gr
ow
ing
dem
and
•
Fully
fu
nd
Rep
air
&
Reh
abili
tati
on
(R
&R
) n
eed
s
•C
om
ple
tio
n o
f lo
ng
term
p
lan
nin
g d
ocu
men
ts
•O
pti
miz
e PA
YGO
an
d n
ew d
ebt
to f
inan
ce C
IP
CH
AL
LE
NG
ES
A
ND
OP
PO
RT
UN
IT
IE
S
9
Co
st o
f S
ervic
e C
om
pa
re
d to
ED
U V
olu
me
tric
R
ate
: H
isto
ric
R&
R s
upport
ed b
y R
egio
nal C
apital Im
pro
vem
ent
(RC
) fu
nd u
p t
o 2
006/0
7
F
Y 2
008/0
9 inclu
des inte
r fu
nd loan t
o R
C f
und (
$3.4
M,
or
$1.1
1 p
er
ED
U)
03
/04
04
/05
05
/06
06
/07
07
/08
08
/09
09
/10
10
/11
11
/12
12
/13
13
/14
Cap
ital
& D
ebt
$0
.00
$0
.00
$0
.00
$0
.00
$0
.60
$1
.84
$0
.53
$0
.69
$1
.17
$1
.96
$1
.10
Op
erat
ing
$1
0.8
7$
10
.09
$1
1.0
5$
12
.39
$1
3.7
3$
13
.78
$1
3.3
4$
12
.73
$1
2.5
5$
12
.58
$1
4.0
1
EDU
Rat
e$
7.6
9$
7.6
9$
7.6
9$
8.4
4$
9.1
9$
9.6
2$
10
.75
$1
1.1
4$
11
.14
$1
2.3
9$
13
.39
$0$2$4$6$8
$10
$12
$14
$16
$18
$ p
er
EDU
Ke
y A
ssu
mp
tio
ns:
O
&M
costs
based o
n b
aselin
e p
roje
ctions
R
&R
co
st
ba
se
d o
n p
rop
ose
d F
Y 2
01
4/1
5 T
YC
IP
R
ate
in
cre
ase
s b
y $
1.0
0/E
DU
in
FY
20
15
/16
, 5
% in
cre
ase
in
FY
20
16
/17
an
d
20
17
/18
, a
nd
3%
ea
ch
ye
ar
the
rea
fte
r
10
Co
st o
f S
ervic
e C
om
pa
re
d to
ED
U V
olu
me
tric
R
ate
: P
ro
je
cte
d
Sc
en
ario
A
FY
201
3/1
4F
Y 2
01
4/1
5F
Y 2
01
5/1
6F
Y 2
01
6/1
7F
Y 2
01
7/1
8F
Y 2
01
8/1
9F
Y 2
01
9/2
0
Co
st
of S
erv
ice
$1
5.1
1$1
8.1
3$1
6.8
7$1
7.4
0$1
8.3
0$1
8.3
2$1
7.1
0
ED
U R
ate
$1
3.3
9$1
4.3
9$1
5.3
9$1
6.1
6$1
6.9
7$1
7.4
8$1
8.0
0
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$1
0
$1
2
$1
4
$1
6
$1
8
$2
0
$ p
er
EDU
Key A
ssum
ption
s:
O
&M
incre
ases b
y $
3%
per
year
R
&R
costs
$5M
avera
ge p
er
year
R
ate
incre
ase:
$1.0
0/E
DU
in F
Y 2
01
5/1
6,
5%
incre
ase in F
Y
20
16
/17
an
d 2
01
7/1
8,
an
d 3
% e
ach
ye
ar
the
rea
fte
r
11
Co
st o
f S
ervic
e C
om
pa
re
d to
ED
U V
olu
me
tric
R
ate
: P
ro
je
cte
d
Sc
en
ario
B
FY
201
3/1
4F
Y 2
01
4/1
5F
Y 2
01
5/1
6F
Y 2
01
6/1
7F
Y 2
01
7/1
8F
Y 2
01
8/1
9F
Y 2
01
9/2
0
Co
st
of S
erv
ice
$1
5.1
1$1
5.7
5$1
6.8
7$1
7.2
8$1
7.7
1$1
8.3
7$1
8.8
2
ED
U R
ate
$1
3.3
9$1
4.3
9$1
5.3
9$1
6.1
6$1
6.9
7$1
7.4
8$1
8.0
0
$0
$2
$4
$6
$8
$1
0
$1
2
$1
4
$1
6
$1
8
$2
0
($ Per EDU)
12
Re
cycle
d W
ater (W
C) F
und
Co
st o
f S
ervic
e
R
ecycle
d w
ate
r d
eliv
erie
s a
re p
roje
cte
d to
re
ach ~
50
,00
0 A
FY
in
FY
20
18/1
9
HO
W F
AR
AR
E TH
E R
ATES
fro
m F
ULL
co
st o
f se
rvic
e re
cove
ry
$4
98
/AF
$4
91
/AF
$5
03
/AF
$4
80
$4
85
$4
90
$4
95
$5
00
$5
05
$0
$5
0
$1
00
$1
50
$2
00
$2
50
$3
00
10
Yea
rs1
st 5
Ye
ars
2n
d 5
Ye
ars
CO
S p
er
AF
Mill
ion
s
Ave
rage
d C
ost
of
Serv
ice
Rat
e
O&
M, R
&R
an
d D
ebt
Serv
ice
Co
sts
AF
Co
st o
f Se
rvic
e
48
5,4
41
AF
21
5,6
40
AF
26
9,8
01
AF
80%
dro
p in n
ew
ED
U C
onne
ctio
ns fro
m F
Y 2
006/0
7 d
ue
to
econo
mic
dow
ntu
rn in
FY
200
8/0
9.
13
Histo
ric
al E
DU
C
on
ne
ction
s
7,6
68
7
,16
0
4,8
84
5,9
07
3,7
85
1,2
31
1
,62
7
1,1
16
1
,61
4
2,9
97
0
1,5
00
3,0
00
4,5
00
6,0
00
7,5
00
9,0
00
20
03
/04
20
04
/05
20
05
/06
20
06
/07
20
07
/08
20
08
/09
20
09
/10
20
10
/11
20
11
/12
20
12
/13
Ten
Ye
ar H
isto
rica
l Act
ual
ED
U C
on
ne
ctio
n
14
Pro
je
cted
N
ew
E
DU
C
onn
ec
tio
ns
2,8
27
5,1
06
5,6
49
5,3
01
4,1
32
3,0
08
2
,94
5
2,0
97
1
,98
1
1,9
24
1,5
29
3,5
00
4,0
00
3
,80
0
3,7
00
3
,40
0
2,5
00
2
,30
0
1,8
00
1
,70
0
1,7
00
1,7
00
0
50
0
1,0
00
1,5
00
2,0
00
2,5
00
3,0
00
3,5
00
4,0
00
4,5
00
5,0
00
5,5
00
6,0
00
20
13
/14
Pro
j Act
ual
20
14
/15
20
15
/16
20
16
/17
20
17
/18
20
18
/19
20
19
/20
20
20
/21
20
21
/22
20
22
/23
20
23
/24
Ten
Ye
ar E
DU
Co
nn
ect
ion
s M
em
be
r A
gen
cy v
s. IE
UA
Pro
ject
ion
s
Mem
ber
Age
ncy
IEU
A
201
2/1
3 a
ctu
al pro
pe
rty t
ax r
eceip
ts in
clu
de
s $
10.2
mill
ion fo
r
On
e T
ime
RD
A
15
Sta
ble
&
R
elia
ble
F
un
din
g S
ourc
es:
Pro
pe
rty T
axe
s
$0
$1
0
$2
0
$3
0
$4
0
$5
0
$6
0
20
03
/04
20
04
/05
20
05
/06
20
06
/07
20
07
/08
20
08
/09
20
09
/10
20
10
/11
20
11
/12
20
12
/13
His
tori
cal P
rop
ert
y A
sse
ssm
en
t V
alu
es
and
P
rop
ert
y Ta
x R
ece
ipts
AD
VA
LOR
EM (
$Mill
ion
)R
DA
($M
illio
n)
ON
E-TI
ME
RD
A (
$Mill
ion
)A
sses
smen
t V
alu
e ($
Bill
ion
)
3%
in
cre
ase p
roje
cte
d f
or
FY
s 2
013/1
4 a
nd
20
14/1
5
1%
in
cre
ase p
roje
cte
d f
or
FY
20
15/1
6 a
nd
the
rea
fter
16
Pro
pe
rty T
ax R
ece
ipts P
ro
jec
tio
ns
$-
$1
0
$2
0
$3
0
$4
0
$5
0
$6
0
$7
0
20
13
/14
20
14
/15
20
15
/16
20
16
/17
20
17
/18
20
18
/19
20
19
/20
20
20
/21
20
21
/22
20
22
/23
20
23
/24
Pro
ject
ed
Pro
pe
rty
Ass
ess
me
nt
Val
ue
s an
d
Pro
pe
rty
Tax
Re
ceip
ts
AD
VA
LOR
EM (
$M
illio
n)
RD
A (
$M
illio
n)
Ass
essm
ent
Val
ue
($ B
illio
n)
63%
PA
YG
O:
Ca
pita
l C
all,
Gra
nts
,
Reim
burs
em
ents
,
Pro
pert
y t
axes
37%
Deb
t fu
nd
ing
:
Bond
s a
nd S
RF
loans
17
CIP
F
un
din
g S
ou
rc
es
FY
s 2
00
4-2
01
4: $
63
6M
$0
$2
0
$4
0
$6
0
$8
0
$1
00
$1
20
20
03
/04
20
04
/05
20
05
/06
20
06
/07
20
07
/08
20
08
/09
20
09
/10
20
10
/11
20
11
/12
20
12
/13
20
13
/14
Pro
j Act
$ in Millions
Pay
- G
oB
on
ded
Deb
tSR
F Lo
ans
Gra
nts
CC
RA
Cal
lsC
on
trac
t R
eim
bC
apit
al E
xpen
se
$1
41
.8 $1
26
.9
$1
06
.3
$8
4.0
$1
69
.7
$7
.5
$M
illio
n
Pay
- G
o
Bo
nd
ed D
ebt
SRF
Loan
s
Gra
nts
CC
RA
Cal
ls
Co
ntr
act
Rei
mb
7
9%
PA
YG
O:
Capital call,
Gra
nts
,
Reim
burs
em
ents
,
Pro
pert
y t
ax
21%
Deb
t fu
nd
ing
:
SR
F loans
18
CIP
F
un
din
g S
ourc
es
2015
-2
02
4: $
337
M
$0
$1
0
$2
0
$3
0
$4
0
$5
0
$6
0
20
13
/14
Pro
j Act
20
14
/15
20
15
/16
20
16
/17
20
17
/18
20
18
/19
20
19
/20
20
20
/21
20
21
/22
20
22
/23
20
23
/24
$ in Millions
Pay
- G
oB
on
ded
Deb
tSR
F Lo
ans
Gra
nts
CC
RA
Cal
lsC
apit
al C
on
trac
t R
eim
bC
apit
al E
xpen
se
$1
01
.1
$7
1.2
$
6.7
$1
50
.2
$7
.4
$M
illio
n
Pay
- G
o
Bo
nd
ed D
ebt
SRF
Loan
s
Gra
nts
CC
RA
Cal
ls
Cap
ital
Co
ntr
act
Rei
mb
ST
RA
TE
GIE
S
19
20
Bu
sin
ess G
oal: F
isca
l R
esp
on
sib
ility
Strate
gic
F
in
an
cia
l P
rin
cip
le
s
S
oun
d a
nd p
ruden
t lo
ng term
fin
ancia
l pla
nnin
g t
o p
rovid
e f
or:
•F
ull
cost
of serv
ice r
ate
s f
or
all
Agency p
rogra
ms
•F
undin
g o
f essential re
pair a
nd r
epla
cem
ent
of capital assets
to e
nsure
relia
ble
and h
igh q
ualit
y level of serv
ice
•T
imely
investm
ent in
capital and h
um
an r
esourc
e d
evelo
pm
ent
to
support
futu
re d
em
ands
E
xplic
it fin
ancia
l polic
ies to im
pro
ve t
he
Agen
cy’s
fin
ancia
l
hea
lth
:
•E
sta
blis
h a
nd p
reserv
e f
und b
ala
nce r
eserv
es to m
eet
short
term
and
long t
erm
fu
ndin
g r
equirem
ents
•M
axim
ize P
AY
GO
fundin
g a
nd m
inim
ize n
ew
debt borr
ow
ings
•Im
pro
ve t
he A
gency’s
cre
dit r
ating to e
nsure
futu
re m
ark
et
access
1
2 L
on
g T
erm
Pla
nn
ing
Do
cu
me
nts
•4 W
ate
r S
upp
ly P
lans
•3
Facili
ties/A
sset M
anag
em
ent
Pla
n
•1 P
rogra
mm
atic E
nvir
onm
enta
l Im
pact
Pla
n
•4 D
irection a
nd D
evelo
pm
en
t P
lans
21
Lon
g Te
rm
P
la
nnin
g:
Doc
um
en
ts
T
ran
sitio
n to
bie
nn
ial budge
t beg
innin
g in F
Y 2
015/1
6
A
dop
t 3 –
5 y
ear
rate
s t
o p
rom
ote
sta
bili
ty
N
eed
more
accu
rate
bud
getin
g/fo
recastin
g c
osts
.
G
oo
d u
nd
ers
tan
din
g o
n h
ow
lia
bili
tie
s b
uild
up
an
d h
ow
to
min
imiz
e e
xposure
:
•C
urr
ent
O&
M
•D
ebt
serv
ice
•U
nfu
nded r
etire
ment
costs
•C
apital pro
gra
ms
R
ed
uce
re
lian
ce
on
un
ce
rta
in f
un
din
g s
ou
rce
s (
e.g
. p
rop
ert
y
taxes)
to s
upp
ort
recurr
ing c
osts
(e.g
. O
&M
and
CIP
)
22
Mu
ltiye
ar b
ud
ge
ts a
nd
rates
23
Pro
pe
rty T
ax R
ece
ip
ts
How
a
re
th
ey a
llo
cated
?
Fu
nd
C
urr
en
t
Allo
ca
tio
n
Po
ssib
le r
e-a
llo
cati
on
Adm
inis
trative S
erv
ices (
GG
) 8
%
Can
be r
educe
d if
expenses (
prim
ari
ly
labor)
are
allo
cate
d to o
ther
funds
Regio
nal W
aste
wate
r C
apital
Impro
vem
ent
(RC
)
65
%
“Im
pro
vem
ent
Dis
tric
t C
” (I
DC
) port
ion
,
purs
ua
nt
to R
egio
nal S
ew
age C
ontr
act
Regio
nal W
aste
wate
r O
pera
tio
ns (
RO
) 2
2%
A
dju
stm
ent
de
pe
nd
en
t o
n r
ate
s f
ully
support
ing c
ost
of
serv
ice (
O&
M,
R&
R
an
d D
eb
t)
Recycle
d W
ate
r (W
C)
5%
In
cre
ased
allo
cation w
ill h
elp
esta
blis
h
sta
ble
reserv
es a
nd investm
ent in
gro
undw
ate
r re
charg
e d
evelo
pm
en
t
Wa
ter
Re
so
urc
es (
WW
) -
Allo
ca
tio
n w
ill s
up
po
rt in
ve
stm
en
t in
wate
r re
sourc
es (
purc
hase o
f
supple
menta
l w
ate
r and c
onserv
ation)
To
tal
10
0%
AL-
WW
pro
per
ty t
ax
Ad
d a
co
lum
n w
ith
$$
am
ou
nt
bas
ed o
n 1
2/1
3
actu
als
excl
ud
ing
1X
RD
A
Im
pa
ct o
f e
arl
y r
ep
aym
en
t o
f h
igh
in
tere
st b
on
ds :
–A
nn
ua
l d
eb
t se
rvic
e
–D
eb
t C
ove
rag
e R
atio
–R
ese
rve
ba
lan
ce
s
Im
pa
ct o
f re
du
cin
g r
etire
me
nt u
nfu
nd
ed
lia
bili
tie
s
–A
nnual contr
ibution
–R
ese
rve
ba
lan
ce
s
24
Ana
lysis S
am
ple
s
25
0%
1%
2%
3%
4%
5%
6%
7%
8%
9%
10
%
- 5
10
15
20
25
30
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
23
20
24
20
25
20
26
20
27
20
28
20
29
20
30
20
31
20
32
20
33
20
34
20
35
20
36
20
37
20
38
20
39
20
40
20
41
Millions
curr
ent
avg
cost
of
deb
tav
g co
st o
f se
rvic
e af
ter
pay
do
wn
curr
ent
wit
h n
ew S
RF
20
05
pay
do
wn
20
05
+ 2
00
8 p
ayd
ow
n
Re
pa
ym
ent
of H
ig
h In
tere
st
Bo
nd
s
26
Re
pa
ym
ent
of H
ig
h In
tere
st
Bo
nd
s: 2
005
A
(1
6)
(1
4)
(1
2)
(1
0)
(8
)
(6
)
(4
)
(2
)
- 2 4
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
23
20
24
Millions
rese
rve
usa
ged
ebt
serv
ice
savi
ngs
savi
ngs
20
05
on
ly
27
12
%
15
%
15
%
16
%
17
%
30
%
10
%
0%
5%
10
%
15
%
20
%
25
%
30
%
35
%
- 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
23
20
24
20
25
20
26
20
27
Millions
CA
LPER
S cu
rren
t tr
end
CA
LPER
S tr
en
d a
fter
UA
Lpay
do
wn
No
t fu
nd
ing
UN
FUN
DED
LIA
BIL
IES:
A
nn
ual
Co
st a
nd
Em
plo
yer
Rat
e k
ee
p r
isin
g
Fun
din
g U
NFU
ND
ED L
IAB
ILIE
S:
An
nu
al C
OST
an
d E
mp
loye
r ra
te c
on
tain
men
t
•C
urr
ent
tren
d o
f C
ALP
ERS
con
trib
uti
on
s in
crea
se a
nn
ual
co
st a
nd
to
tal e
mp
loye
r ra
te.
•R
edu
ctio
n o
f u
nfu
nd
ed li
abili
ty s
ign
ific
antl
y re
du
ces
futu
re c
ost
s
Pa
ym
ent o
f C
alP
ER
S
Un
fu
nd
ed
L
ia
bility
28
-30
-25
-20
-15
-10-505
10
20
11
20
12
20
13
20
14
20
15
20
16
20
17
20
18
20
19
20
20
20
21
20
22
20
23
20
24
20
25
20
26
20
27
Millions
rese
rve
s re
du
ctio
nC
on
trib
uti
on
sav
ings
net
cu
mm
ula
tive
sav
ings
In t
his
exa
mp
le,
20
27
is t
he
bre
ak-e
ven
po
int
of
red
uci
ng
the
un
fun
ded
liab
iliti
es o
ver
9
year
s.
Pa
ym
ent o
f C
alP
ER
S
Un
fu
nd
ed
L
ia
bility
The
bre
ak-e
ven
po
int
rep
rese
nts
th
e es
tim
ated
p
oin
t w
hen
th
e cu
mu
lati
ve
savi
ngs
in a
nn
ual
co
ntr
ibu
tio
ns
equ
al t
he
cum
ula
tive
pay
men
ts
tow
ard
th
e u
nfu
nd
ed
liab
iliti
es
E
va
lua
tio
n a
nd
Re
fin
em
en
t o
f F
ina
ncia
l P
olic
ies
•R
eserv
e P
olic
y
•D
ebt M
anagem
ent
Polic
y
•B
udget A
doption a
nd
Am
endm
ent
Polic
y
•U
se o
f N
on R
ecurr
ing (
One T
ime)
Revenues
•C
ontinuin
g D
isclo
sure
Polic
y
29
Nex
t S
tep
s: F
in
an
cia
l P
olic
ie
s &
Fun
d R
ese
rve
T
hre
sh
old
s
B
udg
et sce
nari
os w
ill b
e d
efin
ed b
y:
•Im
pa
ct o
n r
ate
s to
ach
ieve
fu
ll co
st o
f se
rvic
e
•C
IP e
xe
cu
tio
n tim
ing
, a
nd
fu
nd
ing
so
urc
es
•F
un
din
g p
lan
fo
r re
tire
me
nt u
nfu
nd
ed
lia
bili
tie
s
•E
arly r
ep
aym
en
t o
f h
igh
in
tere
st d
eb
t to
re
du
ce
ou
tsta
nd
ing
de
bt a
nd
an
nu
al d
eb
t se
rvic
e c
osts
•E
sta
blis
he
d r
ese
rve
th
resh
old
/ra
ng
e a
nd
tim
ing
to
ach
ieve
the
m
•Im
pa
ct o
n R
ese
rve
s, D
eb
t S
erv
ice
Co
sts
an
d D
eb
t C
ove
rag
e
Ra
tio
30
Nex
t S
tep
s:
Bu
dg
et S
cen
ario
B
asis
QU
ES
TIO
NS
?
BU
DG
ET
W
OR
KS
HO
P #3
MA
RC
H 5
, 2
01
4
31
INFORMATION ITEM
3C
Rec
yc
led
Wa
ter
Upd
at
e
1st H
alf
Fis
cal
Ye
ar 1
3/14
Fe
bru
ary
201
4
Reg
ion
al R
ec
yc
led
Wat
er S
yst
em
FY06
-07
FY07
-08
FY08
-09
FY 0
9-10
FY 1
0-11
FY 1
1-12
FY 1
2-13
FY 1
3-14
Dir
ect
10,0
4811
,153
13,3
6116
,057
16,6
5620
,556
21,8
4021
,400
GW
R2,
981
2,34
02,
684
7,20
88,
028
8,63
410
,479
10,0
00
0
5,00
0
10,0
00
15,0
00
20,0
00
25,0
00
30,0
00
35,0
00
Dir
ect
GW
R
Rec
yc
led
Wat
er D
eliv
erie
s
FY
13-
14 A
ctu
al:
21,5
87 A
FY
(De
c)
Rec
yc
led
Wat
er D
eliv
erie
s
1st H
alf F
Y 2
013
/14
Ag
en
cy
P
ro R
ata
Shar
e o
f
Reg
ion
al F
low
(%
)
Rec
har
ge
All
oc
atio
n
(Ac
re-F
eet
)
FY
12/
13
Chi
no
10.6
7 75
2
Chi
no H
ills
9.19
64
3
CV
WD
24
.37
1,71
1
Font
ana
19.1
8 1,
348
Mon
tcla
ir
4.33
32
1
Ont
ario
22
.12
1,57
4
Upl
and
10.1
4 71
3
To
tals
10
0.00
7,
062
JCSD
’s A
llo
cat
ion
: 31
5
To
tal
Am
ou
nt
Rec
har
ge
d:
7,37
7
Qu
estio
ns?
RECEIVE AND FILE
4A
REGIONAL SEWERAGE PROGRAM PRETREATMENT SUBCOMMITTEE
January 7, 2014
1:30 PM IEUA HQ Building A, Raines Conference Room
6075 Kimball Avenue Chino, CA 91710
Minutes
Members Present
Ruben Valdez………………………………………… City of Chino Richard Gutierrez……………………………………. City of Chino Hills Tony Mata…………………………………………….. City of Fontana Nicole Greene………………………………………... City of Montclair Alisa Hasbrouck……………………………………… City of Ontario Robert Herbster………………………………………. City of Upland Shawn Perumean…………………………………… Cucamonga Valley Water District Craig Proctor………………………………................ IEUA
Absent none
Others Present Tad Garrety………………………………………….…City of Chino Hills Tanya Honeycutt……………………………………...City of Fontana Kenneth Tam…………………………………………..IEUA Julio Im…………………………………………………IEUA Mike Sigsbee…………………………………………. City of Ontario
A. Introductions - Introductions of those present were given. B. Approval of Minutes from November 19, 2013 – Craig Proctor requested that
additional language in the first paragraph of Section B of the draft minutes be changed from “hazardous household collection centers” to “household hazardous waste collection centers”. Robert Herbster made a motion to accept the minutes of November 19, 2013, with the clarification in language, which was seconded by Ruben Valdez. There were no objections.
1. Tech Meeting Report – There was no Technical Meeting held in December. 2. Treatment Plants –
RP-1/RP-4:
RP-1/RP-4 met all the NPDES requirements during this reporting period.
RP-5:
o RP-5 met all the NPDES requirements during this reporting period.
CCWRF:
o CCWRF met all the NPDES requirements during this reporting period.
Agency-wide:
o The Agency-wide 12-month running average incremental increase between final effluent and water supply TDS for the month of October 2013 was 242 mg/L, which did not exceed the 250 mg/L 12-month running average limit. The secondary effluent TDS 12-month running average was 212 mg/L for the month of October 2013.
o The Agency-Wide 12-month running average TDS for the month of November 2013 was 497 mg/L, which is below the 550 mg/L Agency-wide 12-month running average limit.
Collections System:
o No SSOs occurred during the month of November 2013.
Recycled Water:
o No unauthorized discharges of more than 50,000 gallons of disinfected tertiary recycled water into the waters of the state occurred during the month of November 2013.
o No agricultural runoff events were reported to IEUA by member agencies during the month of November 2013.
3. Pretreatment Programs –
A. Chino – Due to State Circuit Boards receiving a violation for exceeding their monthly average discharge limit for copper last October, Chino increased sampling to weekly for 4 consecutive weeks. No other problems have been reported.
B. Fontana – There are no problems to report.
C. CVWD – Evolution Fresh received a TDS violation in December 2013. Best Management Practices are being evaluated as a corrective action.
Printed Circuits Unlimited has closed its doors and will not reopen. The owner of the business and the building management company will be working together to remove all hazardous substances. IEUA has requested that CVWD plug the discharge line as a precaution.
C. Discussion Items
1. IEUA Regional Ordinance Revision IEUA has completed the draft for the revised Regional Wastewater Ordinance. As soon as some minor formatting changes are completed Craig Proctor will send out the draft ordinance to committee members for review and comments. The draft ordinance will be presented to the Regional Technical Committee as an information item in March. IEUA reminded the committee members that once IEUA’s wastewater ordinance is adopted member agencies ordinances will need to be revised as necessary to be consistent with IEUA’s ordinance recognizing that IEUA is the primary Control Authority for Significant Industrial Users.
2. IEUA Local Limits Scope of Work A Request for Proposal for the IEUA Local Limits study was posted to the Agency’s BidNet system at the end of December 2013. Proposals will be accepted until January 29, 2014. IEUA would like committee members to participate in the review and consultant selection process. After a consultant is selected, IEUA would like for the committee members to continue their participation through the local limits development process.
3. Mutual Aid Agreement The Mutual Aid Agreement, adding Jurupa Community Services District, will be going to the IEUA Board on January 15 for approval. Most member agencies have completed the approval process, however several are still ongoing: City of Ontario approved the MAA on December 3, 2013; CVWD’s Engineering Committee will review it this evening with its expected Board approval on January 14, 2014; City of Fontana will have its Council approve it also on January 14; and City of Montclair’s Council is scheduled to review and approve the MAA on February 3.
4. Future Discussion Topics Craig Proctor reiterated that there will be a lot of work involved with the Local Limits revision, which will be the major project this subcommittee will be
involved in throughout the year. The goal is to complete the project by the end of the year.
D. Other Items – Craig Proctor announced that future meetings will continue to be held on the 1st Tuesday of each month at 1:30 pm. Meeting will continue to be held monthly while the Local Limits study is being conducted. RFP’s for the Local Limits will be brought back for discussion at the next meeting. Tad Garrety provided an update on the FOG partnership with S. Groner Associates, Inc. A high degree of interest exists by residential households in recycling and disposal of cooking oil. Residential recycling/disposal is not very high on the Chino Hills’ program, however understanding the nexus and connection between it and SSO’s is being reviewed for outreach opportunities. He thanked Jason Gu (IEUA) for his assistance in working with the City of Chino Hills seeking grant funding for the projects development and outreach program. The City of Chino Hills has revamped its NPDES program to incorporate the pretreatment program, and is now reaching out to auto mechanic shops on recycling and disposal of oil. Tad will keep the Subcommittee updated on the City’s progress. Ruben Valdez stated that in January the City of Chino began waste cooking oil counts, which will continue for six months.
The next meeting will be held on February 4, 2014 at 1:30 pm at IEUA. The meeting adjourned at 1:50 pm.
REGIONAL SEWERAGE PROGRAM PRETREATMENT SUBCOMMITTEE
February 4, 2014
1:30 PM IEUA HQ Building A, Raines Conference Room
6075 Kimball Avenue Chino, CA 91710
Minutes
Members Present
Ruben Valdez………………………………………… City of Chino Nicole Greene………………………………………... City of Montclair Robert Herbster………………………………………. City of Upland Shawn Perumean…………………………………… Cucamonga Valley Water District Mike Sigsbee…………………………………………. City of Ontario Craig Proctor………………………………................ IEUA
Absent Richard Gutierrez……………………………………. City of Chino Hills Tony Mata…………………………………………….. City of Fontana
Others Present Kenneth Tam…………………………………………..IEUA Julio Im…………………………………………………IEUA
1. Introductions - Introductions of those present were quickly given. 2. Approval of Minutes from January 7, 2014 – There were no changes to the minutes.
Robert Herbster made a motion, seconded by Shawn Perumean, to approve the minutes of January 7, 2014 as presented. There were no objections.
3. Informational Items & Updates –
a. Tech Meeting Report – There were no updates from the Technical Meeting
held January 30.
b. Treatment Plants – There were no violations or unauthorized discharges for the month of January 2014.
RP-1/RP-4 met all the NPDES requirements during the month of December 2013.
RP-5 met all the NPDES requirements during the month of December 2013.
CCWRF met all the NPDES requirements during the month of December 2013.
The Agency-wide 12-month running average incremental increase between final effluent and water supply TDS for the month of November 2013 was 243 mg/L, which did not exceed the 250 mg/L 12-month running average limit. The secondary effluent TDS 12-month running average was 213 mg/L for the month of November 2013.
The Agency-Wide 12-month running average TDS for the month of December 2013 was 499 mg/L, which is below the 550 mg/L Agency-wide 12-month running average limit.
No SSOs occurred during the month of December 2013.
No unauthorized discharges of more than 50,000 gallons of disinfected tertiary recycled water into the waters of the state occurred during the month of December 2013.
One agricultural runoff event was reported to IEUA by a member agency during the month of December 2013.
c. Pretreatment Programs
CVWD – Evolution Fresh continues to have high TDS issues above their 550 mg/L discharge limit, which they have not able to reduce. They have hired Environ Strategies as a consultant to assist them in resolving the issue. IEUA is working closely with Evolution Fresh on the TDS issues.
Printed Circuits Unlimited owners are continuing to work closely with the property management company to remove all plating solutions and hazardous substances from the vacated facility. Progress is slow but Printed Circuits has committed to do the right thing and remove remaining hazardous substances from the site. All materials removed are being properly manifested and disposed by a licensed hazardous waste hauler. Ontario – Four industries received late notices for deficient Self-Monitoring Reports. Those included: Korden, Nestle Waters, Net Shapes, and Sun
Badge. IEUA staff continues to provide training to the industries on Self-Monitoring Report preparation and timely submission. Chino – High levels of copper in State Circuit Boards discharge was discovered to be due, in part, the discovery that Printed Circuits Unlimited had used State Circuit Boards facility for several weeks in December. Although Printed Circuits Unlimited was basically out of business, it used State Circuits’ facility and appears to have discharged wastewater with high levels of copper under State Circuits’ permit. State Circuit Boards will be listed in Significant Non-Compliance (SNC) for the copper violations.
4. Discussion Items
a. IEUA Regional Ordinance Revision The draft Regional Wastewater Ordinance was reviewed. Although the ordinance has been revised to attempt to match EPA’s ordinance, IEUA’s program is rather unique and appropriate language must be drafted to reflect its uniqueness. Ontario staff suggested changing language in Section 2.3 of the ordinance from “no person” to “no SIU”. There was no objection to this suggested change and IEUA staff will include this clarification in the draft. The definition of “monthly average limit” will be removed since this phrase is not used anywhere else in the ordinance. The phrase “medical waste” is too vague and too general. It should be defined specifically, but clearly it does not include solids. CVWD staff felt that having too many rules complicates the implementation and compliance process. Every rule in the ordinance should be evaluated to determine its current need, enforceability and applicability. Certain mandates by the EPA must be included, however staff will review all optional ones and remove those that are not necessary. The “Detergents, surface-active agents (surfactants)” prohibition needs to be addressed in the ordinance language due to past foaming incidents in the City of Chino. Language stating “might cause excessive foaming” should be changed to “that causes excessive foaming” since this type of incident has and could happen again. Discussion was held regarding 40 CFR language and definitions. Section 17 of the draft ordinance prohibitions will be removed entirely. Montclair staff felt that the definition of “hazardous waste” should also be reviewed and tweaked. Further discussion was held regarding 40 CFR
language and definitions. CVWD staff disagreed, stating that specific definition of what constitute hazardous waste is not needed. Having such definitive language of what is and is not considered hazardous waste depending on the setting would be burdensome and difficult to enforce. Also, many varying definitions by the different state and federal environmental agencies create additional confusion. Additional language defining hazardous waste is not needed; the definition is already covered under other sections of the Regional Ordinance. There were no further comments on the draft Ordinance. IEUA reminded the committee members that once the Ordinance is adopted, member agency ordinances will need to be revised indicating that IEUA is the primary Control Authority for Significant Industrial Users. While some member agencies already have language in their ordinances covering this requirement, IEUA provided sample language to the committee members.
b. IEUA Local Limits Scope of Work Four proposals were received for the IEUA Local Limits study. IEUA requested that several of the committee members assist in the review and consultant selection process. Shawn Perumean (CVWD), Robert Herbster (Upland), and Nicole Greene (Montclair) volunteered to assist with the review and selection process. IEUA informed the committee that an update on the local limits will be presented as an information item to the Regional Technical Committee in March.
c. Mutual Aid Agreement Most member agencies have completed the approval process and submitted signature pages, however several are still outstanding: Chino Hills, Montclair and CVWD.
d. Future Discussion Topics There were no future discussion topics suggested.
5. Other Items
Craig Proctor announced that IEUA will be closing the Regional Plant No. 2 drying beds to member agency combination trucks as the site is undergoing rehabilitation. He asked if the committee members would please pass on this information to their collection system operations group.
The next meeting will be held on March 4, 2014 at 1:30 pm at IEUA. The meeting adjourned at 2:35 pm.
RECEIVE AND FILE
4B
! (
! (! (
! (
Ch
ino
Hil
ls
(De
c 2
013
)C
hin
o(D
ec
201
3)
On
tari
o(D
ec
201
3)
Mo
ntc
lair
(De
c 2
013
)
Up
lan
d(D
ec
201
3)
Cu
cam
on
ga
Va
lley
Wa
ter
Dis
tric
t (D
ec
201
3)
Fo
nta
na
(D
ec
201
3)
°0
510
2.5
Mile
s
TO
TAL
ED
U B
Y C
ON
NE
CT
ION
TY
PE
(Y
TD
)
Bu
ildin
g A
ctiv
ity
Rep
ort
- Y
TD
Fis
cal Y
ear
2013
/14
Le
ge
nd
ED
U (
YT
D)
Res
iden
tial
>10
.0
1.0
- 1
0.0
<=
1.0
Co
mm
erci
al
>10
.0
1.0
- 1
0.0
<=
1.0
Ind
us
tria
l
>10
.0
1.0
- 1
0.0
<=
1.0
HA
LF
MIL
E G
RID
: T
OTA
L E
DU
's (
YT
D)
00.
51
1530
4575
+
Pro
ject
ed
Re
sid
en
tial
(ED
Us)
Co
mm
erc
ial/
Ind
ust
rial
(ED
Us)
Tota
l (ED
Us)
Tota
l (ED
Us)
Ch
ino
214
3124
566
5
Ch
ino
Hil
ls1
89
553
CV
WD
6845
113
364
Fon
tan
a49
4493
510
Mo
ntc
lair
67
1320
0
On
tari
o15
268
220
1300
Up
lan
d8
3139
223
Tota
l49
823
473
238
15
Co
ntr
acti
ng
Age
ncy
YTD
Act
ual
Se
rvic
e A
rea
Uni
nco
rpo
rate
d
RECEIVE AND FILE
4C
IEU
A R
ECYC
LED W
ATE
R D
ISTR
IBU
TIO
N –
JAN
UA
RY 2
01
4
TOTA
L A
LL P
LAN
TSIn
flu
ent: 5
2.5 M
GD
Del
iver
ed: 2
8.2 M
GD
Perc
en
t D
eliv
ered
: 54
%
Cre
ek
Dis
char
ges
RP‐1 (
00
2): 7
.6 M
GD
RP‐5 (
00
3): 3
.5 M
GD
CC
WR
F (0
04
): 6
.0 M
GD
Tota
l: 1
7.1 M
GD
Oth
er S
urf
ace D
isch
arge
Pra
do P
ark
(00
1): 3
.0 M
GD
Gro
un
dw
ate
r Re
char
geSt
orm
wat
er/L
oca
l Ru
no
ff: 2
.1 M
GD
Imp
ort
ed W
ate
r (M
WD
): 2
.1 M
GD
Re
cycl
ed W
ate
r: 1
0.5 M
GD
Tota
l: 1
4.7 M
GD
12
99 Z
on
e1
1.5 M
GD
11
58 Z
on
e1
.7 M
GD
10
50 Z
on
e1
.3 M
GD
93
0 Z
on
e2
.1 M
GD
RP‐4
Infl
uen
t: 9
.4 M
GD
Del
iver
ed:
8.5 M
GD
Perc
en
t D
eliv
ered
: 90
%R
P‐1
Infl
uen
t: 2
7.7 M
GD
Del
iver
ed:
13
.9 M
GD
Perc
en
t D
eliv
ered
: 50
%C
CW
RF
Infl
uen
t: 7
.4 M
GD
Del
iver
ed:
0.0 M
GD
Perc
en
t D
eliv
ered
: 0.0
%R
P‐5
Infl
uen
t: 8
.0 M
GD
Del
iver
ed:
5.8 M
GD
Perc
en
t D
eliv
ered
: 73
%
16
30 Z
on
e2
.1 M
GD
80
0 Z
on
e9
.5 M
GD
Rec
ycle
d W
ater
Rec
har
ge
Del
iver
ies
/ Pla
n -
Jan
uar
y 20
14 (
Acr
e-F
eet)
Del
iver
ies
are
dra
ft u
nti
l rep
ort
ed a
s fi
nal
.
Bas
in1/
1-1/
81/
9-1/
151/
16-1
/22
1/23
-1/3
1M
on
th
Act
ual
Mo
nth
Pla
nY
ear
To
D
ate
Act
ual
Ely
86.6
21.7
61.8
41.2
211.
380
.023
51B
anan
a0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
050
.051
4H
icko
ry25
.221
.039
.30.
085
.610
0.0
746
Tur
ner
1 &
246
.20.
01.
954
.110
2.2
0.0
Tur
ner
3 &
426
.346
.518
.747
.113
8.6
0.0
8th
Str
eet
27.6
40.4
2.9
37.4
108.
320
0.0
1171
Bro
oks
26.3
10.1
12.4
60.1
108.
910
0.0
963
RP
313
.356
.52.
10.
072
.025
0.0
1134
Dec
lez
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0V
icto
ria
35.0
45.6
12.0
65.6
158.
250
.043
8S
an S
evai
ne0.
04.
60.
07.
211
.850
.024
4T
otal
286.
524
6.4
151.
231
2.7
996.
988
0.0
8,37
44,
746
AF
, pas
t FY
End
of M
onth
Act
ual
Rec
ycle
d W
ater
Rec
har
ge
Del
iver
ies
/ Pla
n -
Feb
ruar
y 20
14 (
Acr
e-F
eet)
Del
iver
ies
are
dra
ft u
nti
l rep
ort
ed a
s fi
nal
.
Bas
in2/
1-2/
52/
6-2/
122/
13-2
/19
2/20
-2/2
8M
on
th
Act
ual
Mo
nth
Pla
nY
ear
To
D
ate
Act
ual
Ely
22.1
23.7
2.4
0.0
48.2
100
2351
On
5 cf
sB
anan
a0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
0 0
514
Off
Pen
ding
TN
red
uctio
n, p
urgi
ng w
ith IW
Hic
kory
0.0
0.8
5.0
0.0
5.8
100
746
4 cf
s th
ru F
MM
with
IW o
n fo
r D
ecle
zT
urne
r 1
& 2
16.7
11.7
0.0
0.0
28.4
501.
5 cf
s te
mp
turn
out
Tur
ner
3 &
412
.646
.40.
00.
059
.015
0O
n 4
cfs
thru
Dee
r C
reek
8th
Str
eet
19.0
31.9
0.0
0.0
50.9
100
1171
On
3 cf
sB
rook
s19
.618
.90.
00.
038
.510
096
3O
n 3
to 5
cfs
RP
30.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00
1134
RW
off
with
IW o
n to
Dec
lez
Dec
lez
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
00
No
RW
del
iver
y m
echa
nism
Vic
tori
a23
.943
.10.
00.
067
.015
043
8O
n 5
cfs
post
rai
nS
an S
evai
ne4.
828
.40.
00.
033
.210
024
4O
n 2
cfs,
hol
ding
<3
ft in
bas
inT
otal
118.
720
4.9
7.4
0.0
331.
085
08,
374
5,85
3 A
F, p
ast F
Y E
nd o
f Mon
th A
ctua
l
Rec
ycle
d W
ater
Rec
har
ge
Del
iver
ies
/ Pla
n -
Mar
ch 2
014
(Acr
e-F
eet)
Del
iver
ies
are
dra
ft u
nti
l rep
ort
ed a
s fi
nal
.
Bas
in3/
1-3/
53/
6-3/
123/
13-3
/19
3/20
-3/2
63/
27-3
/31
Mo
nth
A
ctu
alM
on
thP
lan
Yea
r T
o
Dat
e A
ctu
al
Ely
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
250
2351
Ban
ana
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
100
514
Hic
kory
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
150
746
Tur
ner
1 &
20.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
040
Tur
ner
3 &
40.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
040
8th
Str
eet
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
200
1171
Bro
oks
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
200
963
RP
30.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
020
011
34D
ecle
z0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00
0V
icto
ria
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7043
8S
an S
evai
ne0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
050
244
Tot
al0.
00.
00.
00.
00.
00.
013
008,
374
7,24
0 A
F, p
ast F
Y E
nd o
f Mon
th A
ctua
l
813
Sta
tus
as o
f 2/
13/1
4
813
Sta
tus
as o
f
813
July
August
Septem
ber
Octob
erNovem
ber
Decembe
rJanu
ary
Janu
ary
Februa
ryMarch
April
May
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
Acre‐feet per Month
FY 201
1/12
FY 201
2/13
FY 201
3/14
030
6191
122
152
183
213
243
274
304
335
365
0
1,00
0
2,00
0
3,00
0
4,00
0
5,00
0
6,00
0
7,00
0
8,00
0
9,00
0
10,000
11,000
Days Into Fiscal Year
Acre‐feet
FY 201
1/12
FY 201
2/13
FY 201
3/14