Transcript
Page 1: Rapid gain adaptation optimizes pursuit accuracyosbornelab.uchicago.edu/publications/cosyne_2016_BL.pdf · by adaptive gain in MT neurons and pursuit. Rapid recovery of mutual information

B. Liu, M.V. Macellaio and L.C. Osborne Rapid gain adaptation optimizes pursuit accuracy

Department of Neurobiology, The University of Chicago, Chicago IL, USA

2. Rescaling of response gain with stimulus variance in MT neurons and pursuit:

In the natural world, the statistics of sensory stimuli fluctuate across a wide range. In theory, the brain could maximize information recovery if sensory neurons adaptively rescale their sensitivity to match their limited response bandwidth to the current range of inputs. Such adaptive coding has been observed in a variety of systems, but the premise that adaptation optimizes behavior has not been tested. Here we show that adaptation in cortical sensory neurons maximizes information about visual motion, and minimizes tracking errors in pursuit eye movements guided by that cortical activity. Thus efficient sensory coding is not simply an ideal standard but rather a compact description of real sensory computation that manifests in improved behavioral performance.

purs

uit

MT

neur

on

a

b

∆I (b

its)

Imean (bits)

n=230 0.5 1.5

-0.9

-0.6

-0.3

0

1

c

d

time (ms)-100 0 100 200 300

info

mat

ion

(bits

)

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8 datashuffled

-100 0 100 200 300time (ms)

info

mat

ion

(bits

)

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4 datashuffled

∆I

normalized stimulus10.50-0.5-1

norm

aliz

ed re

spon

se

0

0.5

11/81/41/21248

e

f

0.125 1 8gain scale factor

norm

aliz

ed in

form

atio

n

MT (n=94)pursuit (n=7)0

0.20.40.60.8

1

3. Mutual information: Maximize information

by adaptive gain in MT neurons and pursuit.

Rapid recovery of mutual information after step change in direction variance.

prob

abilit

y

d

0102030

a

eye direction (deg)

targ

et d

irect

ion

(deg

)

0

0.03

0.06

0.09

0.12-30

-10-20

-3 -1.5 0 1.5 3

H

400 80 120160200

prob

abilit

y of

tria

ls

0

0.15

0.3

0.4572ms HTL

n=6504

time after variance shift (ms)

c

f

e

40 80 120160200

prob

abilit

y of

tria

ls

54ms

LTH

n=6066

0time after variance shift (ms)

0

0.15

0.3

0.45

Prob

abilit

y of

tria

ls

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

44ms

LTH

n=13623

time after variance shift (ms)40 80 1201602000

n=13744

prob

abilit

y of

tria

ls

0

0.2

0.4

0.6 61msHTL

time after variance shift (ms)40 80 120160 2000

6. Variance shift detection on single trials:MT neuron

pursuitLTH HTL

b

0 100 150 200

thre

shol

d

50

trials

time after variance shift (ms)

threshold

0

5

10

15

1. Introduction and Experiments:

The theory of efficient coding is linked to the idea that neural systems maximize information relevant to behavioral performance that can influence survival. Observations of neural responses in many organisms have demonstrated a capacity for efficient coding, but the consequences for behavior have not been explored. In our work, we demonstrate for the first time that efficient coding applies to a neural system as a whole, improving the accuracy of the movements it generates, and not solely to individual sensory neurons. We have exploited the close connection between cortical motion estimates and smooth pursuit eye movements to demonstrate parallel adaptation effects in sensory neurons and movement behavior. We find that adaptation to motion variance optimizes the encoding of motion information by MT neurons, with a behavioral impact of optimizing information in pursuit eye movements, minimizing visual tracking errors, and thereby improving vision of moving objects.

7. Discussion:

Funding: Alfred P. Sloan Foundation ; Whitehall Foundation ; Brain Research Foundation ; NEI EY023371 1. Barlow HB, 1961. 2. Osborne LC and Lisberger SG, 2009 3. Osborne LC et al., 2005. 4. Fairhall AL et al., 2001. 5. Brenner et al., 2000. 6. Wark B et al., 2009. 7. Wark B et al., 2007.

0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8-0.9

-0.6

-0.3

0

∆I (b

its)

n=11

Imean (bits)

velo

city

(deg

/s)HTL

firin

g ra

te (s

pike

s/s)

time (ms)

0

30

0 500 1000 1500

HTL

hvel

vvel

0

60

time (ms)0 500 1000 1500

stim

ulus

(deg

)200

00 1000 2000 3000

time (ms)

150

0

time (ms)0 1000 2000 3000

dots on

MT neuron recording eye tracking

stim

ulus

(deg

)

SD (d

eg)

SD (d

eg)

MT

neur

onpu

rsui

t

b

a

60300-30-60-100

0100200300400

L (SD 12°)H (SD 35°)

direction (deg)

rate

(spi

kes/

s)

L

H

-20-80 -40 0 40 80

eye

dir (

deg)

-10

0

10

20

L (SD 5°)H (SD 15°)

L

H

direction (deg)

rate

/mea

n

420-2-4

0

2

4

6

L(SD 12°)H(SD 35°)

direction/SD

c

direction/SD-8 -4

eye

dir/m

ean

-4

-2

0

2

4

L(SD 5°)H(SD 15°)

0 4 8

d

e

f gain indexnorm indexfilterednorm filtered

0

0.2

0.4

0.6

∆g/<g>-0.5 0 0.5 1-1

fract

ion

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

∆g/<g>-0.5 0 0.5 1-1

gain indexnorm indexfilterednorm filtered

fract

ion

time (ms) 0 100 150 200

erro

r (de

g)0

4

8

12datano adapt

min error

50direction error (deg)

-30 -15 0

prob

abilit

y

00.10.20.30.40.5

datano adapt

min error

15 30

b ca

0 0.5 1.5 21gain scale factor

rms

erro

r (de

g)

0

6

12

18 SD 1° 2.5°5°10°15°20°25°30°36°40°45°

d e f

0target SD (deg)10 20 30 40 50

∆erro

r (de

g)0

0.51

1.52

2.5

erga0

120

0

150

0target SD (deg)10 20 30 40 50

purs

uit e

rror (

deg)

no adapt modeldatamin error

er

ga

dire

ctio

n (d

eg)

-30

-15

0

15

30

stimulusdatano adapt

time (ms) 0 100 150 20050

4. Optimal gain for minimizing pursuit error:

5. Gain adaptation depends on experienced stimulus values:

-60 -30 0

L

TH

-1000

100200300400

direction (deg)30 60

firin

g ra

te (s

pike

s/s)

a c e

gain

(spi

kes/

s de

g)

direction SD (deg)10 20 30 40

0

25

50

L to TL to H

f

LTH 1 2

time (ms) -100 -50 0 50 100

dire

ctio

n (d

eg)

-60

-30

0

30

60

prob

abilit

y

direction (deg)

H-60 6020-20

T

b

L

direction (deg) -80 -40 0

eye

dire

ctio

n (d

eg)

-20

-10

0

10

20

40 80

L

TH

d0.6

n=11

L to TL to H

gain

0

0.2

0.4

normalized SDL H

MT neuron

pursuit

Barlow’s hypothesis of efficientsensory coding:

−60 −30 0 30 600

0.05

0.1

prob

abilit

y

−60 −30 0 30 600

0.5

1

stimulus value (s)

resp

onse

(r)

stimulus distribution

high

gai

n

low gain

threshold

Recommended