Download pdf - R-V Dynamics Illusion Size-Weight Illusion Z< s8j · 2016. 1. 24. · _ #. Û %Ê'2 Ì IPSJ SIG Technical Report Vol.2016-HCI-166 No.1 1 R-V Dynamics Illusion @ Size-Weight Illusion

IPSJ SIG Technical Report

1

R-V Dynamics Illusion Size-Weight Illusion

†1 †2 †1 †1 †1

“R-V Dynamics Illusion”

“Size-Weight Illusion” R-V Dynamics Illusion

Size-Weight Illusion R-V Dynamics Illusion Size-Weight Illusion

R-V Dynamics Illusion, Size-Weight Illusion

(Mixed Reality; MR) (Virtual Reality; VR) MR

MRMR

MR

CG

CG CG

MR

Pseudo-HapticsPseudo-Haptics

[3] MR

[4-6]CG

†1 College of Information Science and Engineering, Ritsumeikan University †2 Graduate School of Information Science and Engineering, Ritsumeikan University

(R) (V) R-V Dynamics Illusion

[7][8]

MR

Size-Weight IllusionSize-Weight Illusion

[9] Size-Weight Illusion

R-V Dynamics Illusion

Size-Weight Illusion


[10]

PHANToM [1] SPIDAR [2]

VR/MR

Pseudo-HapticsLecuyer

ⓒ 2016 Information Processing Society of Japan

Vol.2016-HCI-166 No.12016/1/21


2

[11] Ban

[12]

Taima MR

[13] R-V Dynamics IllusionMR


[14] Rock

[15] SPIDARSize-Weight Illusion


MR MRSize-Weight Illusion

[17]

[7][8] Size-Weight IllusionR-V Dynamics Illusion

Size-Weight IllusionMR Size-Weight Illusion


MR Size-Weight Illusion 1 Size-Weight Illusion

2

1 3

MR MRHMD

(Canon, HM-A1) Canon MREAL

(Polhemus, 3SPACE FASTRAK)

MR

HMD

CG

165mm90mm 80mm

45mm750g

165mm 90mm 80mm135mm (150%), 180mm (200%), 225mm

System configuration

Real object used in experiments


Vol.2016-HCI-166 No.12016/1/21


3

(250%) 4

1 A1 A4 1CG

1 B1 B4, B1_1B4_1

45mm 2 1CG 1 C1

C4, C1_1 C4_1

[7]

(ATR-Promotions, TS-EMG01)

25mm

500Hz

[18]

%MVC (Maximal Voluntary Contraction) %MVC (MVC)

(EMG) MVC [19] %MVC

(1)

100)MVC(

)EMG(%MVC (1)

GNU Octave

%MVC %MVC

MR Size-Weight Illusion


Experimental patterns

R0# A1 A2 A3 A4

* 165*90 165*90 165*135 165*180 165*225

1

R0# B1## B2 B3 B4

B1_1### B2_1 B3_1 B4_1

*

165*90

165*90 (45)

165*135 (45)

165*180 (45)

165*225 (45)

2

R0# C1## C2 C3 C4

C1_1### C2_1 C3_1 C4_1

*

165*90

165*90 (45)

165*135 (90)

165*180 (135)

165*225 (180)

: mm, #

Virtual object used in experiments

Experimental scene


Vol.2016-HCI-166 No.12016/1/21


4

4 (A1 A4) (R0)

5 2

3

11 9 2 1

5C2=10

90100BPM

0 30

(1) HMD (2) 5 2

(3) (2) 1 (4) 90

(100BPM) 3

(5) (2) (3)(4)

(6) 1 2

(7)

(8) (2) (7)

1%

(i)

(ii) (iii) Size-Weight Illusion

(i)


Size-Weight Illusion (ii) R0 A1

R0

[20]

(iii)


MR Size-Weight Illusion

1Size-Weight Illusion


1

(B1 B4) (B1_1 B4_1) 819 2

119 2 1 9C2=36

(2) 92

1 2

Result of preliminary experiment

-2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2


Vol.2016-HCI-166 No.12016/1/21


5

(i)

(ii)

(iii) R-V Dynamics Illusion Size-Weight Illusion

(i) Size-Weight Illusion

(ii) R-V Dynamics Illusion

B1/B1_1R-V Dynamics Illusion

(iii) Size-Weight Illusion


2 1


[7] Size-Weight

Illusion


1

1 (C1 C4) (C1_1 C4_1)

9 2

1

2 2

(i)

(ii)

(iii) Size-Weight Illusion

(i)


1 R-V Dynamics Illusion(ii)(iii) 1


3

1

Result of Experiment1

-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1 1.5 2

2

Result of Experiment2

-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1

-2.5 -2 -1.5 -1 -0.5 0 0.5 1


Vol.2016-HCI-166 No.12016/1/21


6

2

A1, A4, B1, B4, B1_1, B4_1, C4, C4_1 8

5

(1) HMD (2) 8 1

(3) (2) 1 (4) 90

(100BPM) 3

(5) (4) 3 (6) (4), (5) 3 (7)

(8) (2) (7)

R-V Dynamics Illusion, Size-Weight Illusion, 3

3 %MVC%MVC t

%MVC

8 (a)

(C4-C4_1) R-V Dynamics Illusion (B4-B4_1)

[21]

8 (b) (A1-A4)

(B1-B4, B1_1-B4_1)

8 (c)

[7]

3 R-V Dynamics Illusion


(a) R-V Dynamics Illusion (b) Size-Weight Illusion (c)

3 %MVC Result of Experiment3 (Average value of the %MVC)

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%

0%

5%

10%

15%

20%

25%


Vol.2016-HCI-166 No.12016/1/21


7

3 %MVC

1

(i) 9 (a)

(ii) 19 (b)

(iii) 9 (c) (i)

(ii)


[22]


[24][25]

2

(iii)

(i)(ii)(iii) Size-Weight IllusionR-V Dynamics Illusion


(a)

Size-Weight Illusion (b) Size-Weight

Illusion R-V Dynamics Illusion

(c) Size-Weight Illusion

(d) Size-Weight Illusion

(e)


MR

B

(a) B4 (250%) B4_1 (250%) (b) A1 (100%) A4 (250%) (c) B4_1 (250%) C4_1 (250%) 3 %MVC

Result of Experiment3 (Time variation of the %MVC)

0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.10%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.10%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

0 0.3 0.6 0.9 1.2 1.5 1.8 2.1


Vol.2016-HCI-166 No.12016/1/21


8

1) T. H. Massie and J. K. Salisbury: “The PHANToM haptic interface: A device for probing virtual objects,” Proc. ASME Winter Annual Meeting Symp. on Haptic Interfaces, Vol. 55, pp. 295 - 299, 1994. 2) M. Sato: “Development of string-based force display: SPIDAR,” Proc. VSMM 2002, pp. 1034 - 1039, 2002. 3) A. Lecuyer, S. Coquillart, A. Kheddar, P. Richard, and P. Coiffet: “Pseudo-haptic feedback: Can isometric input devices simulate force feedback?,” Proc. Virtual Reality, pp. 83 - 90, 2000. 4)

, Vol. 13, No. 2, pp. 129 - 139, 2008. 5) Dent-Softness Illusion

Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 271 - 278, 2011. 6) Shape-COG Illusion

Vol. 16, No. 2, pp. 261 - 269, 2011. 7)

, Vol. 19, No. 2, pp. 255 - 264, 2014. 8) Y. Kataoka, S. Hashiguchi, F. Shibata, and A. Kimura: “R-V Dynamics Illusion: Psychophysical phenomenon caused by the difference between dynamics of real object and virtual object,” Proc. The 25th Int. Conf. on Artificial Reality and Telexistence and the 20th Eurographics Symp. on Virtual Environments, pp. 133 - 140, 2015. 9) A. Charpentier: “Experimental study of some aspects of weight perception,” Archives de Physiologie Normales et Pathologiques, Vol. 3, pp. 122 - 135, 1891. 10) H. Y. Solomon and M. T. Turvey: “Haptically perceiving the distances reachable with hand-held objects,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, Vol. 14, pp. 404 - 427, 1988. 11) A. Lecuyer, J. M. Burkhardt, and L. Etienne: “Feeling bumps and holes without a haptic interface: the perception of pseudo-haptic textures,” Proc. CHI 2014, pp. 239 - 246, 2004. 12) Y. Ban, T. Narumi, T. Tanikawa, and M. Hirose: “Controlling perceived stiffness of pinched objects using visual feedback of hand deformation,” Haptics Symposium 2014, pp. 557 - 562, 2014. 13) Y. Taima, Y. Ban, T. Narumi, T. Tanikawa, and M. Hirose: “Controlling fatigue while lifting objects using pseudo-haptics in a mixed reality space,” Haptics Symposium 2014, pp. 175 - 180, 2014. 14) R. R. Ellis and S. J. Lederman: “The role of haptic versus visual volume cues in the size-weight illusion,” Attention, perception & psychophysics, Vol. 53, No. 3, pp. 315 - 324, 1993. 15) I. Rock and C. S. Harris: “Vision and touch,” Scientific American, Vol. 216, pp. 96 - 104, 1967. 16) SPIDARSize-Weight Illusion

, Vol. 7, No. 3, pp. 347 - 354, 2002. 17)

, Vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 15 - 24, 2008. 18) T. Sadoyama and H. Miyano: “Frequency analysis of surface EMG to evaluation of muscle fatigue,” European Journal of Applied Physiology and Occupational Physiology, Vol. 47, No. 3, pp. 239 - 246, 1981. 19)

2006. 20) Y. Ban, T. Narumi, T. Fujii, S. Sakurai, J. Imura, T. Tanikawa, and M. Hirose: “Augmented Endurance: Controlling fatigue while handling objects by affecting weight perception using augmented reality” Proc.

CHI 2013, pp. 69 - 78, 2013. 21)

, Vol. 31, pp. 649 - 655, 1977. 22) , 2012. 23) J. Ross and V. D. Lollo: “Differences in heaviness in relation to density and weight,” Perception & Psychophysics, Vol. 7, pp. 161 - 162, 1970. 24) G. E. Müller and Fr. Schumann: “Ueber die psychologischen Grundlagen der Vergleichung gehobener Gewichte,” Archiv für die gesammte Physiologie des Menschen und der Thiere, pp. 37 - 112, 1889. 25) R. S. Woodworth: “Psychology: A study of mental life,” New York, H. Holt, 1921.


Vol.2016-HCI-166 No.12016/1/21