Page 1 of 13
Publishable summary of INPAC project
Title: Integrating Post-Abortion Family Planning Services into China’s Existing Abortion Services
in Hospital Settings
Acronym: INPAC
Contract/Grant agreement number: 282490
EC contribution: 2,928,384.00 €
Duration: 48 months
Starting date: 01/08/2012
Reporting period: 01/02/2014 – 31/07/2015
Page 2 of 13
INPAC project Publishable summary
Project context and objectives
Repeated induced abortion is associated with a high risk of long-term physical and psychological morbidity
and with a heavy social-economic burden. China is one of the countries with high induced abortion rates in
the world. In 2008, about thirteen million induced abortions were estimated, the repeated abortion rate varied
from 19.0% to 57.9% depending on different study populations according to the data from the INPAC
project situation analysis (WP2 & WP3), which has been reported in the first reporting period. The vast
majority of induced abortions in China is performed in hospital settings, though family planning (FP) clinics
also provide abortion services. However, Post-Abortion Family Planning (PAFP) services are often lacking
in hospital settings.
The primary reasons of unintended pregnancies in China were due to contraceptive failure, incorrect or no
use of contraception. PAFP is commonly recognized as an efficient way to reduce the rates of unintended
pregnancies and therefore to protect women’s health. Data from the INPAC situation analysis also show that
there are barriers for providing effective PAFP services including the policy on PAFP is currently absent,
there is a lack of government and management support in hospital settings, a shortage of trained family
planning professionals and lack of access to PAFP guidelines, a lack of standard PAFP information materials
and a lack of PAFP knowledge of clients and service providers.
Overall objective of the research
The overall objectives of this project is to evaluate the effectiveness of introducing integrated post-abortion
family planning services in existing hospital based abortion services in China in order to reduce unintended
pregnancies and repeated abortions. The research findings might be used to develop policy recommendations
on sustainable development and health system organization to enhance equitable access to reproductive
healthcare.
Specific scientific and technical objectives in the1
st & 2
nd reporting period
To assess the needs and feasibility of integrating PAFP into existing abortion services in hospitals
through the review of FP policy and FP current practice in China as well as best practices of strategies
to deliver PAFP in developed and developing countries.
To assess practicability of integrating PAFP into existing abortion services in participating hospitals
through a health system study involving stakeholders: policy makers, health managers, abortion service
providers and women who have undergone abortion.
To develop detailed intervention strategies for improving access to and quality of FP services after
induced abortion.
To implement and monitor intervention processes, their impact on hospitals and problems occurred
during the implementation
To evaluate the effectiveness of integrated PAFP in terms of reduction of unintended pregnancies and
repeat abortions and to identify health system determinants for effectiveness through comparison across
the intervention groups.
To disseminate the research findings and to bridge the gap between research and policy and actions
through involving policy and decision makers at different levels of government.
Page 3 of 13
Work performed and the main achievements since the beginning of the project
The INPAC project was designed in four phases: PHASE I Situation analysis (WP2, WP3): a detailed situation analysis on the provision and utilization of
abortion services in China.
PHASE II Development of interventions strategies (WP4): the development of project intervention
strategies based on the situation analysis and pre-existing knowledge.
PHASE III Intervention implementation and monitoring (WP5): the implementation and monitoring of
the intervention strategies.
PHASE IV Operational and analytical evaluation (WP6, WP7, WP8): the evaluation of intervention
effectiveness, the project dissemination and policy translation of research findings.
During the first reporting period, INPAC has completed its phase I by the end of January 2014, including
WP2 - Critical review and WP3 - Detailed situation analysis. The main findings were reported in the project
deliverables D2.1 (A report on policy and FP practices based on published and grey literatures) and D3.1 (A
document describe the situation analysis), both reports have been accepted by the EC.
The current 2nd
reporting period mainly covers phase II (WP4) and Phase III (WP5) activities from project
month 19 to month 36 (February 2014 to July 2015). The Phase IV (project dissemination and policy
translation) activities will be done throughout the whole project. A summary of project activities in the 2nd
period is draw in the sections below.
1) The Development of interventions strategies (Phase II - WP4) A three-arm cluster randomized controlled trial was designed based on the results of phase I, which included
two intervention arms and one control arm (Figure 1).
Figure 1: INPAC intervention design
A package of protocol supplementary documents, such as data collection questionnaires and protocol
guidelines for investigators, were developed in both English and Chinese in order to help local investigators
to understand the intervention protocol and the intervention implementation approaches.
This trial has been registered at Current Controlled Trials with a ISRCTN registration number of
ISRCTN01846583 (http://controlled-trials.com/ISRCTN01846583).
Page 4 of 13
2) The Intervention implementation and monitoring (Phase III – WP5) The INPAC intervention study received its ethical approval from the Ethical Committees at Ghent University
(Belgium), Liverpool School (UK) and National Research Institute for Family Planning (NRIFP) (China).
The implementation was officially kicked off on July 05, 2014. By the date of this report, the follow-up data
collection is still on going. To ensure the success of intervention implementation, the following strategies
and activities were carried out.
Hospital randomization and enrolment: we first developed a hospital sampling frame from 30
provinces. Each province provided 12 eligible hospitals except Ningxia, Qinghai and Inner Mongolia
provinces. Since the number of eligible hospitals is limited, they provided 6 hospitals. Three
hospitals were randomly selected from each province, and then randomly assigned to the two
intervention arms or the control arm. A total of 41 selected hospitals have withdrawn after
randomization due to varies practical reasons.
Development of survey questionnaires and informed consent forms for institutions, service providers
and clients: data collection questionnaires were developed for institutions, service providers and
service users (the abortion women) at different pre- and post-intervention time-points. Instructions
on how to fill in the questionnaires were developed in Chinese for the investigators.
Pre-intervention trainings for investigators: two national training workshops were conducted in July
and August 2014 for provincial coordinators from the 30 provinces and hospital investigators from
the 90 participating hospitals (including the hospital replacements). Training material were
developed by Chinese partners. These cover the following topics:
o General information about PAFP services
o Responsibility and capacity of consultants
o PAFP counselling services (principles, procedures, and skills)
o Group education (principles, procedures, and skills)
o Core information to provide after an abortion (health risks of induced abortion and repeated
abortion, reasons of contraception failure, the modern contraceptive methods,
recommendations of contraceptive methods after abortion)
Development of Intervention materials: intervention information posters and leaflets in Chinese were
developed by WP5 leader (CSFP) in close collaboration with UG-ICRH and with support from other
partners.
Intervention implementation and current status: On July 10, 2014, the first hospital enrolled and
started the recruitment of women underwent abortion. The last hospital enrolled on Dec.11, 2014. By
July 31, 2015, all 90 hospitals have completed the facility pre-intervention questionnaires. 58
hospitals completed the facility post-intervention questionnaires. A total of 771 pre-intervention
questionnaires for service providers were completed. 60 hospitals completed the post-intervention
questionnaires for service providers. A total of 18,106 women had been recruited. Among these,
16,359 (90%) completed the one-month follow-up survey, 14,082 (78%) and 10,861 (60%)
completed the three-month and the six-month follow-up survey respectively. Almost all hospitals in
the two intervention groups have received free contraceptives and the IEC materials. Almost all
Page 5 of 13
hospitals in Intervention Group II have established incentive mechanisms to encourage providing
PAFP services.
Development and implementation of electronic data capture (EDC) system: INPAC has developed
its own EDC system, which has been used for WP5 data collection.
A pilot study was conducted by WCSUH team to test the questionnaires and the EDC system in June
2014.
Monitoring of intervention implementation: to ensure the smooth implementation of the intervention
plan and to get correct, objective and reliable intervention results, the INPAC project intervention
study was monitored at four levels with a set of monitoring check lists (Monitoring Plan) to ensure
the intervention progress, the protocol compliance and the data quality control (Figure 2):
The provincial/municipal supervisors were mainly responsible for supervising the three participating
hospitals in his/her own province. The national supervision are organised in 7 groups, each of them
supervising several provinces/municipalities. They reported to the WP5 leader (CSFP) or directly
report to the project coordinator (UG-ICRH). Monitoring is done either by phone contact or by field
visits. Monthly TC meetings are being held since the beginning of WP5 .
During the implementation period, a consortium TC was conducted each month, in order to review
the monitoring data, to solve eventual problems and to discuss possible solutions. Each three months,
the WP5 lead – CSFP reported in writing about the progress of intervention study.
3) Evaluation of intervention effectiveness (WP6) Both quantitative and qualitative methods have been developed to evaluate the effect of intervention
implementation.
Quantitative evaluation: A set of primary and secondary indicators was defined in the evaluation plan (MS3
– Methodology for evaluation of the intervention) which has been developed by the AU-DESC team and
combined with the qualitative evaluation strategies led by LSTM team. A report of pre-intervention study
Page 6 of 13
was developed by the AU-DESC with the collaboration from CSFP (MS4 – Pre-intervention study
completed).
Qualitative evaluation: To perform the qualitative evaluation, LSTM team provided several training
workshops for the Chinese researchers. The pre-intervention and post-intervention data were collected,
transcribed and coded by the 4 Chinese partners who carried out the field work, according to the guidelines
developed by LSTM. Analysis will be done by LSTM during the next reporting period.
4) Translating research into policy and actions (WP7) During the first reporting period, we developed “a list of potential barriers to research translation into action”
(D7.1). After that, we made great efforts on policy translation to strengthen the impact of the INPAC project
on PAFP services. As the WP7 lead partner, WCSUH team in collaboration with NRIFP and FU team,
communicated and interviewed national and provincial level policy makers and kept them informed about
the progress of the INPAC project. A list of policy translation strategies was developed during this reporting
period (D7.2) and has been accepted by the EC. The 3rd PAB meeting is scheduled in September 2015 in
China, several policy makers at different levels will be invited to participate in the meeting where INPAC
progress and the strategies used for policy translation will be discussed. .
5) Dissemination of project progress and preliminary findings (WP8) The dissemination of project progress and preliminary findings was done largely at national and
international levels. 10 abstracts were presented at different international and national scientific conferences
during this reporting period.
Other dissemination approaches were also used, such as the distribution of the project’s leaflets in both
English’ and Chinese languages at national and international conferences, the project’s newsletters, website
updates, and regional or provincial scientific workshops.
6) Project management and coordination activities in the 2nd
reporting period (WP1 and
WP9) The project coordination team UG-ICRH takes the responsibilities of day-to-day project management and
coordination, as well as the scientific supervision. All project activities were carried out under the guidance
of the project management team (PMT), the Scientific Advisory Board (SAB), the Ethical Advisory Board
(EAB) and the Policy Advisory Board (PAB). Various communication approaches were used.
From the beginning of the 2nd reporting period (Feb. 2014) to the end of this period (July 2015), the
following activities have taken place:
Face-to-face meetings, project workshops and advisory board meetings:
o The 1st EAB face-to face meeting was held in July 2014 in China. It was hosted by the NRIFP
team and led by UG-ICRH with four EAB members attended.
o The WP5 kick-off meeting was held in July 2014 in Beijing.
o Two WP5 training workshops were conducted in July and August 2014 in China, all
collaborators from 90 hospitals in 30 provinces participated in the training programs on the
topics mentioned above.
Page 7 of 13
o The intervention evaluation training workshop on qualitative study was conducted in July 2014
in Beijing, China.
o The 1st SAB meeting was held in December 2014 at ICRH in Belgium.
Consortium TCs on the project progress: since September 2012, each month, a consortium TC was
conducted on WP5 progress and monitoring. Several small group TCs were held on WP5 specific topics.
In total, 17 TCs were conducted during the 2nd reporting period.
Monitoring of the budget use: to ensure the budget use in the consortium, the project coordinator (UG-
ICRH) organized an interim financial report between March and April 2015.
The expected final results and their potential impacts
INPAC has achieved most of its objectives for the 2nd
reporting period with deviation on the timeline.
The main conclusions and findings of PHASE I (WP2 and WP3) on the provision and utilization of abortion
services in China have been reported during the first periodic report, and have been reported in detail in D2.1
and D3.1, which provided information on the feasibility and practicability of integrating PAFP services into
existing abortion services in hospitals in China, and has guided the intervention design.
Intervention packages, its implementation and monitoring
A three-arm cluster randomized controlled trial has been designed based on the results of the critical review
and the situation analysis. We also developed intervention guidelines to describe the details of the
intervention packages, together with the tools for the data collection.
We developed a project EDC system to ensure the electronic data entry and management, and conducted a
pilot study before the intervention implementation. The three level trial monitoring ensured the protocol
compliance and the data quality control.
Translational research into policy
Research translation is the final aim of this project. To achieve this objective, we developed a list of potential
barriers to research translation into action. This list has been developed during the first reporting period.
During the second reporting period, we communicated and conducted interviews with national, provincial
and local health authorities and policy makers, to get advice from them on the translation strategies. These
interviews resulted in a list of recommendations on policy translation strategies (D7.2), it has been accepted
by the EC.
Project management activities
A series of project management activates were carried out by all consortium partners. Face-to-face meetings,
regular TCs, phone and email contacts were used to ensure a smooth and efficient communication among all
partners. This ensured the project to achieve its main objectives.
Timeline deviation: The INPAC study is progressing well. However, we are facing important challenges in
the process of intervention implementation as described above. Currently the whole project timeline is
delayed with about 12 month, mainly due to delays on WP3 and WP5. The delays are mainly caused by the
merger between the Chinese Ministry of Health and the Ministry of Family Planning in 2012, which highly
influenced the hospital participation. Since this merger took place after the launch of the project, the
enrolment of hospitals and recruitment of participants took much more time than originally estimated, since
we did not want to make any compromise in science and wanted to follow the study protocol as originally
Page 8 of 13
planned. The delay in WP3 and WP5 has been communicated to the EC in the first period report and in the
deliverables of WP3 and WP5.
The planned 4 deliverables and 3 milestones were fully achieved for the 2nd
reporting period:
D5.1 An implementation plan for the implementation of interventions
D5.2 Mid-term report on the implementation & monitoring process
D7.2 A list of recommendations on the way of knowledge translation from PAB
D8.2 Dissemination strategy available
MS2 A document describing the interventions protocol
MS3 Methodology for evaluation of the intervention
MS4 Pre-intervention study completed
The address of the project public website English version: http://www.inpacproject.eu
Chinese version: www.pac-china.org
Contact details of INPAC consortium
The INPAC project is a four-year collaboration between four Chinese and three European partners,. The
consortium is composed of:
Lead partner: International Centre for Reproductive Health of the Ghent University (UG-
ICRH), Sint-Pietersnieuwstraat 25, 9000 Gent, Belgium. Contact person: Prof. Dr. Marleen
Temmerman & Prof. Dr. Wei-Hong Zhang, e-mail: [email protected] &
Partner 2: Chinese Society of Family Planning - Chinese Medical Association (CSFP). West
street Dongsi Xidajie 42, Beijing 100710, China. Contact person: Prof. Dr. Jian Li, e-mail:
Partner 3: Fudan University (FU), School of Public Health. Handan Road 220, Shanghai 200433,
China. Contact person: Prof. Xu Qian, e-mail: [email protected]
Partner 4: National Research Institute for Family Planning (NRIFP). Haidian District, Da Hui
Si 12, Beijing 100081, China. Contact person: Prof. Shangchun Wu, e-mail:
Partner 5: Sichuan University (WCSUH). People’s South Road 17, Wuhou District, Chengdu
610041, China. Contact person: Prof. Dr. Lina Hu, e-mail: [email protected]
Partner 6: Aarhus University - Danish Epidemiology Science Centre (AU-DESC), Nordre
Ringgade 1, AARHUS C, 8000 Denmark. Contact person: Prof. Dr. Jørn Olsen, e-mail:
Partner 7: Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine (LSTM), United Kingdom, Pembroke Place,
Liverpool, L135QA, UK. Contact person: Dr. Rachel Tolhurst, e-mail: [email protected]
More information can be found on www.inpacproject.eu
Page 9 of 13
Pictures : 1. Project meetings
1.1. WP6 Qualitative evaluation training workshop in Shanghai, June 2015
1.2. The 1st SAB meeting in Ghent, Beglium, Dec. 2014
1.3. The WP5 kick-off meeting and training workshops in Beijing and Wuhan, July-August 2014
1.4. The 1st EAB meeting in Beijing, China, July 2014
Page 10 of 13
1.5. The EC review visit at CSFP, Beijing, China, May 2014
2. WP5 monitoring field visits
2.1. INPAC project leader prof. Wei-Hong Zhang visited Gansu, Qinghai and Ningxia provinces, July 2015
2.2. CMA prof. Li Jian visited INPAC participating hospitals in Gansu and Qinghai provinces, April 2015
2.3. CSFP prof. Che Yan visited participating hospitals in Ningxia province for WP5 monitoring in March
2015.
Page 11 of 13
2.4. The FU team (Prof.Qian Xu, Dr. Liang Ji) member is checking the intervention materials and the data
collection in Jiangsu and Jiangxi provinces, Sep. 2014
2.5. Group education and intervention posters in the intervention hospitals, 2014
3. Project dissemination activities
3.1. Project dissemination (WCSUH team prof. Hu Lina) at the Western China Forum for Gynecology and
Obstetrics, and at the Chongqing Medical and Family Planning Commission experts symposium, July 16,
2015.
3.2. SCU team Prof. Hu Lina presented the Policy Translation Obstacles and Approaches of INPAC project
in the 8th Asia-Pacific Evidence-Based Medicine Conference in March 2015.
Page 12 of 13
3.3. WP5 intervention posters and information flyer in local languge
3.4. The third global symposium on health systems research (Poster) (Cape Town, South Africa, 30
September – 03 October, 2014)
3.5. Dr. Hong JIANG (FU), Jieshuang XU (FU) and Shuchen WANG (UG-ICRH) attended the 12th ESC
conference in Lisbon, May 2014.
Page 13 of 13
3.6. INPAC newsletters