8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
1/33
Privatisation in the UK
A History and Analysis
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
2/33
Historical background
1976 - IMF cuts
1977 - First privatisation -British Aerospace
1978/9 - Winter of Discontent
1979 - Election of Thatcher 1980s - Major privatisations
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
3/33
The First Phase
British Gas
British Steel British Telecom
British Water
British Rail
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
4/33
The Results
Any rational calculation of theoverall costs and benefits of thewhole experiment must give anegative result
Will Hutton, 2002
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
5/33
Private Finance Initiative(PFI)
Private contractors pay for construction cost of building projectsin the public sector, and lease finished project back to thepublic sector for periods up to 30 years.
PFI contracts take cost of borrowing off the Public Sectorbalance sheet, improve the governments finances.
Cost of borrowing is much higher in the private sector - annualexpenditures on PFI higher than if projects funded in publicsector.
Contracts approximately 30 years duration; PFI locks futuregovernments into on-going spending commitments.
PFI does not transfer risk to the private sector - services notallowed to fail.
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
6/33
The current state of PFI:2009
Over 800 PFI/PPP projects in operation in Britain.
Approx 54 billion of investment.
12% of government infrastructure projects Over 200 billion of long-term debt repayment
by the British government
In Government We Trust: Market Failure and the Delusions ofPrivatisations, 2009 - Funnel, Jupe, Andrew
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
7/33
Private Finance Initiative(PFI)
Though the government maintains that this offersbetter value than using public money, in realitythe numbers behind all PFI projects are rigged.
While the government retains much of the risk, theinvestors keep the profits, which often run tomany times the value of the schemes. The publicliability incurred so far by the private financeinitiative is 215bn. One day the repayments will
destroy Britains public finances
George Monbiot, May 2009
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
8/33
Labour on Privatisation
PFI is just Privatisation by another name Harriet Harman, 1996
Our air is not for sale Andrew Smith, 1996
Morally unacceptable... Fundamental objections... - Jack Straw,1997
A publicly owned, publicly accountable rail network - John Prescott,1996
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
9/33
Labour on Privatisation
Practically in every single
instance, the Labour Party waswrong to oppose privatisation
Peter Mandelson, 1998
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
10/33
The Record:Health
Of 133 new hospitals built since 1997, 101 werefinanced using PFI.
149 PFI financed hospitals in the UK by 2009.
NHS will pay up to 70.5 billion for the
buildings.
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
11/33
The Record:Health
Great Western PFI Hospital Swindon - 100 fewerbeds, could not meet local demand.
Plans for PFI hospital in Worcester forced closure ofexisting services at Kidderminster Hospital; newPFI hospital cut beds and staffing levels because ofserious financial deficits.
Nationally, 12,000 beds have been lost since 1997because of PFI costs.
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
12/33
The Record:Health
NHS Wandsworth Trust: to pay more than10m a year until 2034 to private firm
Catalyst for new hospital.
Hospital costs Catalyst 73m to build and
run; Taxpayers to pay 340m overlifetime of project
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
13/33
The Record:Health
Instead of using the opportunity of the taxpayer
bailout to re-open the contracts and negotiatebetter rates in favour of the public sector, the UKGovernment is allowing the banks to restoretheir balance sheets by charging relatively highrates of interest for PFI schemes. The increasedcosts of serving the debt are met from NHSannual budget, and result in reductions in the
money available for services.
Allyson Pollock: Edinburgh University, Centre for International PublicHealth Policy
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
14/33
The Record:Prisons
very little innovation in custodialmanagement. Most of the gains have
come from using fewer staff, lowerwages, less employment protection forstaff and fixed contracts.
Phil Wheatley, DG, UK Prison Service
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
15/33
The Record:Prisons
2008 internal BPS papers leaked to BBC.
Private prisons consistently worst for security,maintaining order, and re-offending rates.
Doncaster Prison 2005 - Chief Inspector of Prisons
found that conditions inside the prison haddeteriorated since the award of the contract.
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
16/33
The Record:Water
Publicly owned Danish water utilities :Copenhagen annual water leakage rate - 4%
Public water utilities of Paris and Milan leakagerates - 10%
Privatised water companies in the UK: SevernWater leakage rate- 26% , Thames Water 32%
Data from OFWAT (the UK Water Regulator), EU research projectWatertime and a study by the Asian Development Bank
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
17/33
The Record:Railways
Quite apart from the privatisation itself, the way inwhich the industry was fragmented was incrediblydamaging. The notion that a relatively healthy
company like British Rail could be broken into 100parts, all of which had to be profitable, could onlyhave been dreamt up by rabid ideologues, moreconcerned with theory than practiceThe
privatisation of the railways represented one of the
great political and economic crimes of the 20thcentury.
On the Wrong Line, Christian Woolmar, 2005
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
18/33
The Record:Railways
Cost cutting, poor track maintenance resulted in failure tomaintain the track network and a series of train accidents.
Accidents - Southall, Ladbroke Grove, Hatfield, Potters Bar.
Accident Inquiry : Railtracks incapacities and lack ofregulatory oversight.
Railtrack divested engineering knowledge of British Rail into
private contractors, had inadequate maintenance recordsand no coherent asset register.
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
19/33
The Record:Railways
The failures also demonstrate how farprivatisation, as an ideology, has permeated thestate in Britain, especially when a Labour
government not only refused to countenance re-nationalisation of the railways but in fact extendedprivatisation as part of its Third Way to include theLondon Underground
In Government We Trust: Market Failure and the Delusionsof Privatisation, 2009 Funnell, Jupe, Andrew
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
20/33
The Record:London Underground
2003: PPP scheme over massive objections
30 year PPP contracts fragmented LU in to four parts
Transport for London in public sector, managed contracts,provided staff and trains
3 privately owned infrastructure companies responsible formaintenance/renewal of track, tunnels, signals and stations
2 companies became Metronet Consortium, 1 became TubeLines. Metronet a combination of different firms.
In 2004 Metronet fined 11m for poor performance.
In 2008 Metronet sought Administration
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
21/33
The Record:London Underground
Contracts that were supposed to deliver 35station upgrades over the first three yearsdelivered 14-40% of the requirements;
stations that were supposed to cost Metronet2m in fact cost 7.5m; by November 2006only 65% of scheduled track renewal hadbeen achieved. They have ended in collapseand chaos. It was a spectacular failure
Transport Select Committee 2008
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
22/33
The Record:Railways
Lost opportunities
Railtracks Insolvency
Metronets collapse
East Coast Mainline to be re-sold
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
23/33
The Record:Civil Service
Facilities, IT, HR
MoD (DII ; DERA = QinetiQ)
Forensic Science Service
ONS
VOSA DWP back office and front line
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
24/33
The Record:Civil Service: Welfare Reform
David Freud Review
Multi-billion pound business.
Welfare Reform Bill (clause 25) allowsfor contracting out of JCP functions
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
25/33
The Record:Civil Service Reform
Observer, March 2009 - secret documents sentby senior DWP officials to JCP directors withdata revealing private firms performed far
worse than JCP Plus in delivering Pathways toWork
Restricted DWP report reveals how private
forms placed only 6% of claimants into workagainst 26% claimed when bidding forcontracts. JCP Plus placed 14% in same period.
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
26/33
The record:Civil Service Welfare Reform
Intensive Activity Period - 2% of firms reachedtarget of getting 40% entrants in to work
Basic Employability Training - 77% of firms notmeeting target of getting 25% of entrants in towork
Gateway to Work 4% of firms reached target ofgetting 45% of 18-24 entrants into work
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
27/33
Operational EfficiencyProgramme (OEP) : 2009
Royal Mint
Land Registry
Met Office
Ordnance Survey
Defence Storage and Distribution Agency
Defence Vetting Agency
UK Hydrographic Office
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
28/33
PFI Now:Two sets of accounts
In spite of the widespread expectation that almostall PFI projects would go on the books as theTreasury fulfils a longstanding promise to move the
public sector to international financial reportingstandards, the Treasury has now issued guidance toWhitehall departments indicating that, while theywill count on departmental accounts, a different
accounting standard will apply for the Treasurysbudgeting purposes
Nicholas Timmins, Financial Times, May 2009
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
29/33
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
30/33
PCS Privatisation policy
These examples are not the result ofaccidental errors of judgement. They resultfrom a political and economic logic whichargues that in almost every sphere of our lives,the market and the profit motive will performbetter than any other system. It is this dogmathat all who want democratically accountable
and publicly owned services must challenge
Mark Serwotka, November 2007
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
31/33
The socialist case for publicservices
Social need instead of social profit
Public accountability instead ofcommercial confidentiality
Long term planning instead of shortterm gain
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
32/33
8/14/2019 Privatisation in the UK
33/33
Where next?
The measure of the restoration lies in theextent to which we apply social valuesmore noble than mere monetary profit.The joy and moral stimulation of work mustno longer be forgotten in the mad chase ofevanescent profits
Inaugural speech - Franklin Delano Roosevelt, 1933