1
Preparing Master Teachers in Bilingual Education and ESL
A Presentation at the Annual Conference of the New York State Association for Bilingual Education
Tarrytown, NY
March 14, 2009
Presenters:
Francis Timothy Walsh, Ph.D. ([email protected]) and
Doris Cintron, Ed.D. ([email protected])
2
Getting Started
3
Getting Started: A Title VII Teachers and Personnel Competitive Grant, Department of
Education, United States Government
DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION
(CFDA No.: 84.195A)
Bilingual Education: Teachers and Personnel GrantsNotice inviting applications for new awards for fiscal year (FY)1995.
PURPOSE OF PROGRAM: The purpose of this program is to providegrants for preservice and inservice professional development forbilingual education teachers, administrators, pupil servicespersonnel, and other educational personnel who are eitherinvolved in, or preparing to be involved in, the provision ofeducational services for children and youth of limited Englishproficiency (LEP).
--excerpted from the Request for Proposals, Office of Bilingual Education and Minority Languages Affairs (OBEMLA)
4
I.Goals and Objectives of the Second Language Learning Master Teacher Development Project
Goal: To provide integrated ESL/Bilingual Education training to New York City Teachers
Objective #1: Recruit 72 inservice and 8 preservice bilingual teachers for training in a three-year Masters program in Bilingual Education with additional training in ESL.
Objective #2: Train 72 inservice and 8 preservice bilingual teachers in an intensive three-year Masters degree program in bilingual education, with special emphasis upon course work in ESL theory, teaching methods, and materials.
Objective #3: Confer Masters degrees upon, and grant provisional New York State certification in Elementary Education with a Bilingual Extension to, 1 preservice and 19 inservice teachers.
Objective #4: Place 20 Master Teachers in New York City’s public schools.
5
II. The Proposed Curriculum
Building upon the success of the Bilingual Education Program at The City College in preparing teachers for service with LEP children, the curriculum will respond to the special needs teachers of English to Speakers of Other Languages. Distribution of courses will be as follows:
I Bilingual Education core courses 9 creditsII English Language courses 6
creditsIII Specialized ESL courses 15 creditsIV Practice/Internship 3 creditsV Content Research Seminar 4
credits TOTAL 37
credits
--from the grant application
6
Project Admissions Requirements
• Personal Admissions Interview with Project Faculty or Staff• High Standards for Admission
– 3.0 Undergraduate GPA– Language other than English– Acceptable study in Education or Related Field– Passing grade on English Proficiency Exam– Acceptable completion of entrance essay– Three letters of recommendation
7
Project Exit Requirements
• Exit Interview• Successful Completion of Course of Study• Successful Completion of Action Research Project• Acceptable Attendance at Leadership Seminar, Annual “Events”
8
Some Outstanding Features of the Project
9
III. Outstanding Features of the Second Language Learning Master Teacher
Development Project
• Student-Directed Leadership Seminar• Annual “Events” Open to the Larger
Community• Action Research• A Teacher-Friendly Comprehensive
Examination
10
IV. The Leadership Seminar•Originally suggested by an outside evaluator
•Focus on Teacher Empowerment:•Teachers organized and directed monthly meetings.
•Teachers offered workshops to one another in areas such as the use of computers in the classroom.
•Teachers initiated a speaker series with experts from the local Board of Education, the College faculty, and elsewhere.
•Each year, teachers elected a representative to serve on the Project’s Advisory Committee.
•Teachers used the seminar to provide feedback on curriculum, such as the required practicum.
•Teachers shared lessons and activities which they had developed at their school sites
11
QuickTime™ and aMotion JPEG A decompressor
are needed to see this picture.
12
The Second Language Learning Master Teacher Development Project, Sponsored by the Bilingual Education/TESOL Programs of
The City College Department of Education
Presents “Action Research and Beyond”
I. Greetings: Inelda Flores Prof. Doris Cintron-Nabi
II. Paper: “Zoe’s Voices: A Case Study of An Action Researcher” Presented by Prof. Tim Walsh III. Discussion by Current Action Researchers: Diana Diaz Jodee Filmer Rolando Perez Prof. Walsh, Moderator IV. Discussion by Graduates: Kathleen Fahrner Milene Toromoreno-Ponce Prof. Walsh, Moderator V. Discussion: “Parallels Between Teachers’ Research and Children’s Research” VI. Closing Words: Jodee Filmer Prof. Beverly Falk Linda Margolin
A Collaborative Action Research “Event” Planned in the Leadership Seminar
13
The Action Research Sequence
• A two-semester experience• First semester: learn about action research methods,
identify a study topic, create a research proposal• Second semester: implement, analyze the project,
submit the final project, meet with colleagues to discuss projects
• Originally resisted by some teachers, due to the amount of time involved, and the approach’s lack of conformity with research practices in other programs
• However, design has been disseminated to other programs
14
V. Some Action Research Topics
• Learner strategies: A case study of two high school ESL students• Journal writing in Kindergarten and first grades• Implementing cooperative learning in the ESL classroom• A case study of an intermediate public school teacher responding
to problems of adolescent motivation in an ESL classroom• Perceptions of cluster teachers: Comparative and contrastive
view[s] of bilingual children• Phonics: A tool for first grade bilingual students to learn how to
read and write• A case study of Elias Santos and the factors that influence his
biliteracy and code-switching in the L2 acquisition• The effects on the writing style in English of a bilingual fourth
grade student when exposed to fiction and discussion around the literature
• Acculturation: A possible cause for Kindergarteners’ varying attitudes toward ESL
15
A Student-Centered Comprehensive Examination
•Teachers met with the project director on a monthly basis prior to the examination•Teachers generated the content of the questions on the examination in their monthly meetings
16
Some Participant DataCumulative Tota ls, Student Participation
Years Recruited Enrolled Gra duated Droppe d
Feb. 19 96- June 2001
202 65 40 25
Project Participant Demographics (N=65)
NYC Residence 91%
Female 71% Median Age 39
Country o f Birth Other than continental US A
74%
Language of Birth Othe r than English
72%
Poss e ssion of Baccalaureate
100%
17
VI. Crossing Boundaries: Effects of the Project on Participants
Linking Practice and ResearchThe best part of it is that it actually got me to start thinking like a researcher. A
researcher teacher. -- “Ellen,” exit interview
Crossing DisciplinesI guess, the stress, the schooling, and everything else, has bonded us? We did study
groups together, we met at different houses, we met at restaurants. We really bonded.
--”Alba,” exit interviewCrossing the Theory-Practice Divide
Usually when you do papers it's about other people's theories. It [action research] helped me get going on a plan to solve this situation [in her classroom]. It's reality. This is what it's like to have a maraca in your hand. In the beginning when I was writing the theories, it didn't hit me. It [understanding the purpose of the research] really started with the interviews.
--“Zoe,” exit interview
18
Obstacles Overcome, Lessons Learned
19
Obstacles Overcome
• Government De-funding in Year One• Bureaucratic Obstacles to Institutionalization of the
Program• State-Mandated Re-certification of the Program• Early Attrition Due to Retarded Approval by State
Agency
20
Accomplishments of the Project
• Institutionalization of the Program• Bilingual/ESL training provided for sixty-five teachers
from some of the most needy communities in New York City
• Positive effect on over 3000 English Language Learners in the public schools, over the six-year period
• Empowerment of teachers via unique curriculum and
program design
21
• CCNY submits Letter of Intent to create new program to the CUNY Office of Academic Affairs.
• CUNY circulates Letter of Intent to other campuses for critique.• CUNY authorizes full proposal development.• Proposal (full curriculum) developed and sent out for external evaluation.• Proposal and external evaluations presented to School of Education Curriculum
Committee for approval.• Proposal presented to faculty for approval to add program to School of
Education offerings.• Proposal submitted to CUNY Board of Trustees.• Proposal sent to State Education Department for review• Program given Hegis Code by the State Education Department =
Institutionalization.
VII. Institutionalization of The Project
22
Participants’ Suggestions for Change
SchedulingThe action research. It would flow a lot easier. Instead of having that summer between, and then, as teachers, a whole new, different group of children, and so on.
--“Alba,” exit interviewProject Content
I can’t decide about the leadership. I have to say this. Don’t require it. But yet, I suppose we never would have had that event happen, if we hadn’t had the leadership class.
-- “Ellen,” exit interview
23
VIII. Lessons Learned
• Be Prepared for the Unthinkable (funding, changing certification requirements)
• Adapt as Circumstances Demand• Design with Student Involvement in Mind
(Advisory Committee, Leadership Seminar)• Identify Participants Who are Willing to “Go
the Extra Mile” in Educating Themselves• Be flexible, responsive, and caring• Include Follow-up in Program Design
24
A Final Question
• Can you identify enablers of and obstacles to implementation of similar multi-faceted programs of teacher education in New York State?
25
Fin