Policy Development in Physical Therapist
Assistant EducationMary Kay Solon, PT, MS
Faculty Development WorkshopUniversity of Indianapolis
May 18, 2013
Guides to help delineate decisions and courses of action
Spell out required, prohibited or suggested courses of action
Pre-decide issues and limit actions so that repeated situations are handled in a similar fashion
Intend to be overall guide
Policies (Liebler)
Should be sufficiently specific to help guide action but flexible enough to accommodate changing conditions.
Should reinforce and be consistent with the overall goals and objectives of the organization.
Are relatively permanent plans.
Policies (Liebler)
Preamble Physical therapist assistant education occurs in an
institutional environment that supports humanistic principles, inquiry, and dedication to the service of society. The physical therapist assistant education program must be integral to institutional missions and be a logical extension of its education and service programs. The institution, through support for program faculty and policies of the education program, encourages its graduates to practice within the legal, social, and ethical context of their careers as physical therapist assistants.
CAPTE SECTION 1: ORGANIZATION
Institutional policies, procedures and practices are based on appropriate and equitable criteria and applicable law. The policies, procedures and practices assure nondiscrimination and equal opportunity to persons involved with the program.
CAPTE Evaluative Criteria 1.1.4
Policies and procedures exist to protect the rights and privileges of persons associated with the education program. Policies and procedures are in place and practices are described for: privacy and confidentiality due process complaints
CAPTE Evaluative Criteria 1.1.6
Policies and procedures exist to ensure the safety of persons associated with the program. Policies and procedures are in place and practices are described for: on-campus educational experiences. off-campus educational experiences. student competence prior to clinical
education.
CAPTE Evaluative Criteria 1.1.7
Written agreements exist for the provision of off-campus clinical experiences. Written agreements with clinical agencies Students only assigned to facilities with
proper contract Ongoing process for review of contracts
CAPTE Evaluative Criteria 1.1.8
The institution provides a process for the participation of core faculty in the governance and in short and long term planning of the program and the institution. rights and privileges commensurate with
other faculty support ongoing development
CAPTE Evaluative Criteria 1.1.9
Policies and procedures exist which support practices by the institution to facilitate compliance with accreditation policies and procedures. The written policies and procedures delineate the responsibilities for accreditation activities and are described for: fees and documentation substantive changes compliance with evaluative criteria within
two years
CAPTE Evaluative Criteria 1.1.10
Student Policies and Procedures 1.4.1. Student recruitment and admission
procedures and practices are based upon appropriate and equitable criteria and applicable law. Recruitment and admission policies, procedures and practices assure nondiscrimination and equal opportunity to all students.
CAPTE Evaluative Criteria 1.4
Students are provided with the current policies, procedures, and relevant information about the institution and program.
How do you do this???
CAPTE Evaluative Criteria 1.4.2
Often developed directly by PTA faculty Must be consistent with institutional policy Sometimes are shaped by exceptions that
are granted by specific situations Some may be imposed by an outside
agency (government, CAPTE, clinical facility)
Source of Policies
Policies permit and require interpretation Phrases like “as situation dictates” provide
flexibility Omit all gender-specific wording (“he,”
“she”) Seek to avoid contradistinctions within
polices and between policies and their related procedures.
Policy Wording
A guide to action A series of related tasks, given in
chronological order, that constitute the prescribed manned of performing the work
Developed for repetitive work to provide uniformity in practice
Facilitate personnel training Permit development of controls and checks Are highly specific
Procedures
Specific tasks that must be done The time and under what circumstances
they must be done Who is to do the tasks (job title, not name)
Procedures – Essential Information
Determine its purpose and audience◦ PTA Program Policy and Procedure Manual◦ Student Handbook◦ Clinical Education Handbook
Use of flow charts and flow process charts can be helpful
Development of Procedure Manual
Clearly list the way each step is to be performed.
Methods
Your institution Your mission, philosophy, goals and
objectives Your school or other source of policies Your curriculum The clinical environment CAPTE
Where Do I Start?
Select three areas of your PTA Program where policies need to be developed or revised
Determine what is driving the need◦ Institution◦ CAPTE◦ Clinical sites◦ Faculty (advisors, instructors, counselors)◦ Student
Draft policies for each of these areas or issues
Activity
“Any program or activity that has as its goals:◦enhancement of individual skills and abilities;
◦clarification of values;◦and development of increased faculty motivation.’
Rothman and Rinehart 1990
Faculty Development
“Are those programs that help the faculty member more effectively fulfill his or her teaching, research, and service responsibilities.”Rothman and Rinehart 1990
Faculty Development Program
Evaluation areas that need to be strengthened due to limited knowledge, skill and/or experience
Development of goals Development of plans Implementation of faculty development plan Periodic reassessment, including revision of
goals and plans.
Faculty Development Process
Misconceptions◦ Underestimate need for development◦ Underestimate benefits of development◦ Belief that having great clinical skills is enough◦ Belief that being a great teacher is natural
Insufficient instructional support
Lack of literature I physical therapy teaching
Barriers to Faculty Development
Institutional evaluation processes
External evaluation processes
Self-assessment
Step 1: Evaluation
Evaluate Identify areas to be strengthened in the
three areas:◦ Individual skills and abilities◦ Clarification of values◦ Development of motivationAnd the following areas:◦ Teaching ◦ Research◦ Service
Step 2: Identification
Evaluate Identify Create Goals
◦ Measureable◦ Time frames◦ Realistic◦ No more than 3
Step 3: Create Goals
Time frames for completion Grow with a friend Search for creative ways to meet your goals Must address improvement for work
activities Include rewards for completion
Make a Plan
Mission to address needs Specific to the faculty Specific to the learning environment Addresses both theory and practice Opportunities for practice and feedback Allows for development of relationships Knowledgeable faculty
Characteristics of Effective Faculty Development Programs
Faculty seminars: a learning community where members work together toward shared goals. May include:◦ Reading lists◦ Interdepartmental activities◦ Projects◦ Discussion groups◦ Reciprocal observations
Faculty Development - Scholarship
Mentoring Teaching portfolios, including
◦ Portfolio development◦ Collaboration between faculty◦ Peer review
Collaborative grant writing Virtual communities Publications
Faculty Development - Scholarship
Education leadership Conference APTA’s Credentialed Clinical Instructor Program Presentation at Chapter, CSM or Annual
Conference CAPTE Self-Study Workshop FSBPT Item-Writing Workshop Education Section Membership An anthology for Physical Therapy Educators Professionalism in Physical Therapy: Core
Values Self-Assessment
Development Opportunities
Decide on a timeline for completion of components of the plan
Decide on a particular day/time that will be devoted to faculty development.
Allow other faculty members the same privilege.
Implement the Plan
Faculty development is just as important as clinical skill development.
New faculty are more likely to overestimate their teaching abilities.
Seasoned faculty may not recognize the need to continue to hone skills and develop further.
Faculty development is an ongoing process.
Conclusion
Rothman J and Rinehart M. A Profile of Faculty Development in Physical Therapy Education Programs. Physical Therapy,1990, 19, 3, 310-313.
Peterson C and Sandhholtz J New Faculty Development: Scholarship of Teaching and Learning Opportunities. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 100 ,19, 3, 23-29.
Peterson C and Umphred D. A Structured Faculty Development Process for Scholarship in Young Faculty: A Case Report. Journal of Physical Therapy Education. 2005 19, 3, 86-88.
Pagilarulo M and Lynn A. Priorities and Benchmarks for New Faculty in Physical Therapist Education Programs: Perceptions of Program Directors. Journal of Allied Health. 2004, 33, 4, 271-278.
Liebler J and McConnell C. Management Principles for Health Professionals, 3rd Ed. Aspen. 1999, pp. 104-1113.
References