Transcript
Page 1: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

Photoproduction ofPhotoproduction of KK++ near near thresholdthreshold

►Main features of the reactionMain features of the reaction►KinematicsKinematics►KK++ meson identification meson identification►TAPS calibration for charged particlesTAPS calibration for charged particles►MC simulation conditionsMC simulation conditions►ResultsResults►SummarySummary

V.L. Kashevarov, CB@MAMI Collaboration Meeting, Basel 2006

Page 2: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

p p → K→ K++ (1405)(1405)

►((oror**)) mass =mass = 1406.5 MeV 1406.5 MeV► TThreshold =hreshold = 1454.97 MeV 1454.97 MeV► Full width = 50 Full width = 50 2 MeV 2 MeV► decay modes:decay modes: ooo o (33%),(33%), (33%),(33%), (33%)(33%)► FFinal particles to be detected:inal particles to be detected:

(1)(1) KK++ { { oo ( ( oo n n ) ) o o } } 11.9%11.9%

(2)(2) KK++ oo ( ( pp ) ) o o } } 21.1%21.1%

(3)(3) KK++ {{oo p p ) ) 17.2%17.2%

(4)(4) KK++ { { ((++n n ) ) 15.8%15.8%

(5)(5) KK++ nn ) ) 33.3%33.3%

Page 3: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

KinematicsKinematics

► = 1455 – 1507 MeV= 1455 – 1507 MeV

Ekin (MeV) (deg) Ekin (MeV) vs (deg)

Page 4: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

(1)(1) oo{ { ((o o nn) ) } } oo

Ekin (MeV) vs (deg)

oo

oo nn

Page 5: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

(2)(2) oo{ { ( (pp) ) } } oo

Ekin (MeV) vs (deg)

oo

pp

Page 6: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

(3)(3) oo p p) )

Ekin (MeV) vs (deg)

oo pp

Page 7: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

(4)(4) ((++nn) )

Ekin (MeV) vs (deg)

nn ++

Page 8: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

(5)(5) nn) )

Ekin (MeV) vs (deg)

nn ++

Page 9: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

KK++ meson identification in TAPSmeson identification in TAPS

Cluster energy (MeV)

Tim

e of

fli

ght (

ns)

Page 10: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

TAPS calibration for charged particlesTAPS calibration for charged particles

pp

pp

++

++

Cluster Energy (MeV)

k

in(

MeV

) k

in(

MeV

)

Time of flight (ns)

Page 11: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

TAPS calibration for charged particlesTAPS calibration for charged particles

pp

pp

++

++

Cluster Energy (MeV)

k

in(

MeV

) k

in(

MeV

)

Time of flight (ns)

Page 12: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

MC simulation conditionsMC simulation conditions

► Endpoint taggerEndpoint tagger: E: E 1455 – 1507 MeV1455 – 1507 MeV

► Tagger bin = 2 MeVTagger bin = 2 MeV► Ladder = 800 kHz (Main tagger from 900 MeV)Ladder = 800 kHz (Main tagger from 900 MeV)► Tagging efficiency = 0.4Tagging efficiency = 0.4► Live time = 60%Live time = 60%► LH2 target length = 5 cmLH2 target length = 5 cm► Front of TAPS – Center of target = 120 cmFront of TAPS – Center of target = 120 cm► Old PID and MWPC, but without any materials in Old PID and MWPC, but without any materials in

forward directionforward direction► No Cherenkov detectorNo Cherenkov detector► Total cross section for 1480 MeV = 100 nbTotal cross section for 1480 MeV = 100 nb

Page 13: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

ResultsResults

E K+ = F (E cluster) E K+ = F (ToF) E = 1475 MeV

( K +) M (MeV)

Page 14: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

ResultsResults

( K +) M (MeV)

(1)(1)oo o o n nooPartial Partial contributioncontribution0.8% (0.06%)0.8% (0.06%)(2)(2)o o pp

oo1.8% (0.13%)1.8% (0.13%)

(3)(3) KK++ {{oo p p ) ) 44.8% (0.25%).8% (0.25%)

(4)(4) KK++ { { ((++n n ) ) nn 2.8% (0.45%) 10.2% (0.9%)10.2% (0.9%)

Page 15: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

Results : InvMassResults : InvMass

(on ) o ( o n ) * ( o n o )

(1)(1)oo o o nnooPartial Partial contributioncontribution0.6% 0.6% (2)(2)o o pp

oo0.8%0.8% 1.4% 1.4%

(p ) o ( p ) * ( p o )

Page 16: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

Results : InvMassResults : InvMass(3)(3) KK++ {{oo p p ) ) 22.4% .4%

(4)(4) KK++ { { ((++nn ) ) nn 4.2% 6.6% 6.6%

+ ( n) + n n * (

n)

+ ( o p) * ( o

p)

Page 17: Photoproduction of K + L(1405) near threshold

SummarySummary

► The best way for investigation of the reaction is to The best way for investigation of the reaction is to measure MM( measure MM( ,K ,K++););

► Coincidences between KCoincidences between K++ and two or three final and two or three final state particles are needed to suppress background;state particles are needed to suppress background;

► Endpoint tagger would be very useful;Endpoint tagger would be very useful;► TAPS detector allows to do a good identification of TAPS detector allows to do a good identification of

KK++ mesons for cluster size < 3 and cluster energy < mesons for cluster size < 3 and cluster energy < 200 MeV;200 MeV;

► Missing mass resolution: 25 MeV;Missing mass resolution: 25 MeV;► Detection efficiency: 10.2 %;Detection efficiency: 10.2 %;► Expected yield: 0.1 events/nb/h.Expected yield: 0.1 events/nb/h.