Transcript
Page 1: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Telematic Performance at Warwick

Mark Childs, Centre for Academic Practice,

University of Warwick

Page 2: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Labels

• Virtual performance

• Virtual theatre

• Telematic performance

• Telepresent performance

• Distributed performance

Page 3: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Definitions

the phrase "telematic performance work" refers to the use of a telecommunication network to establish links between two remote spaces at the same time and to present the activities in those two separate spaces variously as a single performance event.

… these activities … make use of the Web as a third performance "space". – Cellbytes http://isa.hc.asu.edu/cellbytes/scott/

Page 4: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Definitions

"telematics" means more than simply videoconferencing, it implies a different awareness of your body and a different engagement with the visual/kinetic information received from the other end (or ends) - Susan Kozel

Page 5: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Virtual Performance

Draws on experiences of technology (specifically virtual reality)

• explores notions of "self", "location" "body/identity"

Exploits advantages of technology

• accessible, mutable, recordable, transferable, innovative, fun

Page 6: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

The Telematic Performance

• Susan Kozel, Practitioner based in Vancouver

• First year students at Warwick

• Performance and Practice module

Page 7: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Performance space

• Physical performance space

• Virtual performance space

Page 8: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

PCMonitorwebcamera

Hub

P

P

P

uplink

PCMonitorwebcamera

P

P

LaptopData projectorVideo cameraVideo bus

multipoint

P

P P P

screen

Page 9: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004
Page 10: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Audiences

• Performers can see each other on their computers

• People sit in studio and watch via projection

Page 11: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004
Page 12: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Activities in workshop

Discussions of concepts Online chat

Structured improvisations– Creating a virtual face and body Follow the leader

Rehearsed performance pieces

Page 13: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Structured improvisations

Page 14: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004
Page 15: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004
Page 16: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004
Page 17: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004
Page 18: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004
Page 19: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004
Page 20: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Rehearsed performance piece

Page 21: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004
Page 22: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004
Page 23: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Physical Performance workshop

Page 24: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Videoconferenced physical performance• Took place Friday, 8th March, 2002

• Canterbury and Exeter

• Eastern physical performance

• Performers in one half of studio

• Wall-length screen hung in centre

• Other half of group projected on screen

Page 25: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Why did it fail as a workshop?

• delays in setting up

• low frame rates

• image freezing and speeding up

• time lags

Page 26: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Why did it fail as a workshop?

• Inappropriateness of subject matter

• Selection of activities

• difficulties with communication

• difficulties with performance space

• sightlines

• inappropriate expectations

Page 27: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Solutions

• Include students and staff more in the explorative aspect of the project

• Use the link to demonstrate work rather than work across the link

• Make technology part of what is being explored

Page 29: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

DMU performance examples

• Mirroring exercise

• Face

• Global village people

• Timelag demonstration

Page 30: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Differences with Warwick

• Students based at home for 2nd and 4th session

• Dial-up modems created additional difficulties

• Performance and connection from own space created different ‘feel’

Page 31: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Problems with virtual performance

• Immersive?

• Engaging?

• Reliable?

• Lacking corporeality?

• Therefore pointless?

Page 32: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

Final Thoughts (1)

The idea of the body displaced in time and space though “performing” in a present, virtual space is not enough (in my opinion) to support the rhetoric and hyperbole that drives much of the web-based activity we are speaking of.

- Johannes Birringer “Connected Dance”

Page 33: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

(2) But ...

In response to ADaPT - a performance across six sites involving:

• “live decorporealistions”

• tearing up paper in front of a camera

• multiple images of someone swivelling in a chair

Page 34: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

(3) Questions

• Is this a new area for performance work or a few techies getting over-excited by technology?

• Is it a springboard for creativity, or a mask for lack of creativity?

• Is it missing the entire point of theatre, or rediscovering it?

Page 35: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

3D Visualisation Group

• Chromakey work

• Motion capture

• Virtual reality models

• Stereoscopic projection

Page 36: Performance in Telemaric Spaces Nov 2004

[email protected]

http://www.warwick.ac.uk/ETS/annie

http://www.warwick.ac.uk/3d/