Pelvic floor imaging
Jennifer Kruger1 Hans Peter Dietz2,
1Department of Sport and Exercise Science, University of Auckland, Auckland, New
Zealand
THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLANDDEPARTMENT OF SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE
2Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia
Outline
Pelvic floor imaging in general 2D imaging General use of 3D ultrasound 3D pelvic floor imaging
Pelvic floor function
Research of pelvic floor (pf) function in elite nulliparous athletes using 3D ultrasound.
Possible clinical implications
Introduction
Ultrasound imaging of pelvic floor available for many years Lack of ionizing radiation Ease of use Cost effectiveness
Recently - capable of imaging in multiple planes, 3D images, ‘real time’ property.
These proved useful particularly obstetrics, gynaecology, paediatrics and cardiology
I N
T R
O D
U C
T I O
N
THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLANDDEPARTMENT OF SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE
2D imaging
Previously 2D/B mode ultrasound scanning used define pathology and normal function of pelvic floor.
Abdominally, intravaginal or transperineal. Function assessed:
Descent of bladder, uterus and rectal ampulla during a valsalva manouevre.
Images in the mid-sagittal plane. Still widely used.
2D
Im
ag
ing
THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLANDDEPARTMENT OF SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE
2D imaging
Measurements of bladder neck descent and urethral rotation.
THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLANDDEPARTMENT OF SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE
Ultrasound images showing measurement of bladder neck descent and urethral rotation. Bladder neck descent (BND)= x-r –x-s. (Dietz et al 2006)
2D
Im
ag
ing
3D ultrasound imaging
Use of 3D ultrasound popularised by obstetric scanning. Volume images of the fetus
Some suggestion improves diagnostic capabilities Cleft palate Spinal defects
Gynaecological pathologies Quantify volumes in urethra and
paravaginal supports Anal canal anatomy and mammography
THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLANDDEPARTMENT OF SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE
3D
IM
AG
ING
Obstetric imaging
3D pelvic floor imaging
Recent advances in 3D/4D transperineal ultrasound imaging suitable for visualisation of
pelvic floor muscles.
3D
Pelv
ic fl
oor
imag
ing
THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLANDDEPARTMENT OF SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE
3D pelvic floor imaging
Display mode on ultrasound machine shows
multiplanar images in sagittal, coronal and
axial view and a rendered volume image.
Volume image is the integration of 2D
sectional images.
Acquisition of multiplanar images allow
access to the axial plane – previously
domain of magnetic resonance imaging.
UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLANDDEPARTMENT OF
3D
PE
LVIC
FLO
OR
IM
AG
ING
3D pelvic floor imaging
A standard acquisition screen of pelvic floor imaging as captured with a Voluson 730 expert system. The orthogonal views are seen at the top left (A plane), top right (B plane), and bottom left (C plane). The bottom right image shows a rendered volume image of the entire levator hiatus. (Dietz et al 2006)
UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLANDDEPARTMENT OF
3D
Pelv
ic fl
oor
imag
ing
3D pelvic floor imaging – assessing function
Unique plane of acquisition for levator hiatal area:
‘plane of minimal dimensions’ Smallest distance from the inferior edge of
the symphysis pubis to the anal rectal angle Levator hiatal area bounded by the symphysis
pubis anteriorly, anal rectal angle posteriorly, puborectalis/pubococcygeus laterally.
Hiatal area measures – pelvic floor function Rest Maximum pelvic floor muscle contraction Maximum valsalva
3D
PE
LVIC
FLO
OR
IM
AG
ING
THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLANDDEPARTMENT OF SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE
3D imaging
A mid-sagittal image. Line indicates plane of minimal dimensions
B corresponding axial image showing entire levator hiatus ( dotted area)
3D
PE
LVIC
FLO
OR
IM
AG
ING
UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLANDDEPARTMENT OF
Protocol for 3D pelvic floor imaging Transperineal imaging:
GE Kretz Voluson 730 Expert ( similar) Wide angle of acquisition (85°) curved array volume
transducer 8-4MHz. Imaged supine after voiding Transducer ‘sits’ on the perineum mid-sagittal
orientation Mid-sagittal/Axial image on the screen Symphysis pubis reference point – during movement Evaluation post processing – proprietary software Methods highly reproducible (Guaderrama 2005, Yang 2006,
Dietz 2006 )
3D
PE
LVIC
FLO
OR
IM
AG
ING
THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLANDDEPARTMENT OF SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE
Hiatal area on valsalva
Courtesy H.P Dietz
3D
PE
LVIC
FLO
OR
IM
AG
ING
THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLANDDEPARTMENT OF SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE
‘Ballooning’ of hiatus3
D P
ELV
IC F
LOO
R IM
AG
ING
THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLANDDEPARTMENT OF SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE
Courtesy H.P Dietz
Pelvic floor muscle contraction3
D P
ELV
IC F
LOO
R IM
AG
ING
THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLANDDEPARTMENT OF SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE
THE UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLANDDEPARTMENT OF SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCE
Introduction
Preliminary evidence women in long term high impact sport (HIFIT) athletes
Poor progress in labour (Kruger 2006)
Increased incidence of stress incontinence (Bo
2004)
Previous research demonstrated increased cross-sectional area of levator-ani muscle in HIFIT women (Kruger 2006)
Stress incontinence more prevalent in high impact sports (Eliasson 2002, Nygaard 1997 )
Association between bladder neck descent, hiatal area on valsalva and pelvic floor dysfunction
Aims
Use transperineal 3D ultrasound to characterise
the pelvic floor muscle function in HIFIT women
and compare it to an age-matched control group.
Investigate pelvic organ descent in both groups
during a valsalva manouevre to determine if
there is an association with urinary stress
incontinence.
Methods
Results
All data normally distributed Mean age 28.5 and 27.6yrs for HIFIT and controls All asymptomatic for prolapse Incidence of SUI in the athletes and controls
3 HIFIT – SUI – only 1 HIFIT – UI - only 2 Controls- SUI & UI
Significant differences levator hiatal area on valsalva and BND between groups. HIFIT group higher values for both parameters + increased pubovisceral muscle diameter
None of the other measured parameters different
Results
HIFIT ± SD(n=24)
Controls ±SD(n=22)
P value
Levator hiatal area at rest [cm2] 12.71 ± 2.49 12.77 ± 2.43 0.72
Levator hiatal area on PFMC [cm2] 10.59 ± 1.71 9.72 ± 2.11 0.2
Levator hiatal area on Valsalva [cm2] 21.53 ± 9.98 14.91 ± 7.18 0.01*
Pubovisceral muscle diameter [cm] 0.96 ± 0.17 0.70 ± 0.11 <0.01*
Bladder descent on Valsalva [mm] 22.70 ± 7.85 15.10 ± 10.20 0.03*
Uterine position on Valsalva [mm] 22.70 ± 17.15 28.70 ± 16.90 0.31
Rectal position on Valsalva [mm] 1.04 ± 17.38 5.37 ± 11.36 0.35
Results
Hiatal area and Bladder Neck descent in HIFIT and controls
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
1 2
HIATAL AREA ONVALSALVA
BND
Relationship between BND and Hiatal area in SUI women
0.00
5.00
10.00
15.00
20.00
25.00
30.00
35.00
40.00
0 1 2 3 4 5 6
Subjectsar
ea/d
esce
nt B
N
BND
Hiatal area
1=Hifit
2=Control
* HIFIT
Conclusions
HIFIT women differ in several aspects of pf function
> Area of levator hiatus on valsalva
No association between hiatal area on valsalva and SUI - was an
association with BND. Caution very small numbers
Importance of BN position during raised intra abdominal pressure
Incidence of SUI in HIFIT – ‘overflow phenomenon’ or may be due to
? Changes in the connective tissue.
Incidence of SUI in athletes in keeping with that of the general
population (10%) (Bo 2006)
Possible clinical implications
Pf muscle function determined by ultrasound
May be a method to aid in ‘risk assessment’ for labour.
Better advise women on the likely obstetric impact of long term, high impact sport.
Development of SUI in athletes during competition – etiology unknown but likely to resolve when sport is stopped (Nygaard 1999)
Thank-you for your attention