Partnership Returns, 1992by Timothy D. Wheeler
F
or 1992, partnerships reported the largest annualincrease in profits in recent history, as net income(less deficit) more than doubled, from $21.4 billion
to $42.9 billion (Figure A). This increase continued thetrend that began after enactment of the Tax Reform Act of1986, a trend that was re-enforced for 1992 by the accel-eration of the economic recovery following the recessionof 1990-1991. The 1992 increase in net income (lessdeficit) was caused by both an increase in net incomeand a decline in net deficit. Net income increased 7percent, from $113.4 billion for 1991 to $121.8 billion for1992, the third largest increase in over two decades. Atthe same time, net deficit decreased 14 percent, from$92.0 billion to $78.9 billion, the largest decline in overtwo decades. Although the industry group of real estateoperators and lessors of buildings has historically reportedthe largest deficits ($33.1 billion for 1992), this group wasthe largest contributor to the rise in net income (lessdeficit), accounting for $8.5 billion (40 percent) of theoverall $21.5 billion increase (Figure B) [1-7].
Figure A
Partnership Gain or Loss by Type of Partnership andProfit Status, Tax Years 1983-1992Way amounts are in billions of dollarsl
Tax year
1983 ...............1984 ...............
Total
-i-2.6-3.5-8.9
-17.4-6.414.514.116.621.442.9
GainL2)
48.655.76DS63.566281280.981.978.381.3
Type of partnership
GeneralLoss Gain
Urnited
(3)
-32.5-36.6-42.4-45.3-43.4-42.7-45.2-44.1-40.2-35.1
NOTE: Detall may not add to totals because of rounding.
(4)
11.714.016.616.821.6
3D.133.034A35.140.5
Loss
(5)-30A-36.6-43.5-52.3-49.6
-54.2-54.6-55.6-51.8-43.8
Parbwnship Aefift In 1992Notwithstanding the overall increase in partnership profitsfor 1992, both the number of partnerships (1.5 million)and the number of partners (15.7 million) declined slightly(Figures C and D). Even though the number of limitedgain partnerships decreased slightly, while the number oflimited loss partnerships showed a small increase, the netdeficit for all limited partnerships showed one of the
Timothy D. Wheeler is a statistician with the CorporationSpecial Projects Section. This article was prepared underthe direction of Alan Zempel, Chie.f
largest declines in recent years, from $16.7 billion for1991 to $3.3 billion for 1992. (Limited, as well asgeneral partnerships, are discussed in the Explanation ofSelected Terms section under "Partners.") About three-fourths of all limited partnerships and almost 70 percent ofthe total number of partners in all partnerships were in thefinance, insurance, and real estate industrial division. The1992 net losses (losses in excess of gains) reported bylimited partnerships in finance, insurance, and real estatetotaled $6
'3 billion, compared to the net loss of $3.3
billion reported for all limited partnerships. In contrast,for 1991, limited partnerships in finance, insurance, andreal estate had a net loss of $13.8 billion, and all limitedpartnerships showed a net loss of $16.7 billion (Figure E).
The continuing improvement of partnership profit-ability is further indicated since, from 1990 to 1991, onlytwo industrial divisions (finance, insurance, and real estateand services) showed increased profits, while from 1991to 1992 every industrial division except wholesale andretail trade showed increases. For 1992, as for previousyears, partnership business operations continued to bedominated by activities in either finance, insurance, andreal estate, or services (Figures E and F). Together, thesetwo industrial divisions accounted for more than three-fourths of each of the $121.8 billion in positive netincome (gain), $78.9 billion in net deficit (loss), and $42.9billion total for net income (less deficit). Most of the$13.1 billion overall decline in net deficit for 1991 wasalso concentrated in these two divisions, $9.6 billion infinance, insurance, and real estate and $1.8 billion inservices.
For 1992, the losses generated by partnerships in thereal estate industry no longer overwhelm the gains in thefinance and insurance industries, as they have in recentyears. The $14.8 billion net gain shown for the financeand the insurance industries almost equalled the $15.4billion net loss generated by the real estate industry. Thenet income (less deficit) for finance and insurance in-creased (14 percent) from $12.8 billion for 1991 to $14.6billion for 1992. For the same period, the net loss re-ported for the real estate industry declined (40 percent),from $25.6 billion for 1991 to $15.4 billion for 1992.Within the finance and insurance industries, holding andinvestment companies accounted for 69 percent of netincome Oess deficit) and the security and commoditybrokers and service industry accounted for an additional29 percent.
Within real estate, businesses that were operators andlessors of buildings led the way (Figure E), followed bybusinesses that were subdividers and developers. Realestate as a whole accounted for 82 percent of the limited
75
Partnership Returns, 1992
Figure B
Net Incorne'or Defl6lt, Real Estate. Operators Com, rtpared to All Pa nershipp,'Tax Years 1983-1.992
Billions of dollars,60 r
Tax'Y69r,
7
. Figure C
Number of. Partnerships", by- Type of Partnership andPr6fitStattis,.Tax.YeEirs,1983-1992--,-(Number of are in thousands] '! , . - I
Tax, yea
1983 .........................1984 ..............
.1985_-***-..........1986 ......................
1987 .......... :.I
i988 ..............1989
... .........'1992
.........................
.Totai ,
M,~1,6421,6441,714.1,703,
11.646.
1;6541,6351,554,
-1,515I , 1e486
Type of p.qdnersoip, ,
General,
Gain
(2)
707,750
766766
782770739
732
Lim
I D)
. Ga in I
636660663617,iiv571528519462
NOTE: Detail may not add to totals because of rounding..
82101197w46
128.-.114
130124
ted
'Loss
(5)152-157173,181166166166171
147
,paitnershi's in finance, insurance, and real estate. Lim-pited partnerships in real estate had. a net deficii of $17,.2billion,'while the, net-deficit for the entire finance; msur-ance and real estate divisionwas, a
.comparatiVely modest
$6.3 billioh. -O.f'the $9.6 billion dec-line'in net losses forfinance,'insurance," and real"estate
-operators.4nd 16ssors
of blildings ac'coun,ted for abb~t Itwo'-*t'hird2s,` And r*eal
.estate subdividers and dev.elopers.accounte.d for mosuofthe remainink dectease:in lo§sds.
While real estate partnerships donuinated losses, paI17:nerships in the serVicei iJidqstr.ial division dominated,profits,(Table 1). Although,the'ser,vice industries ac-counted for only 17 percent- (252j517) of all paqrt~rshios,they Accounted for almost: 77 percent ($33.0 billion) 'of thei
Numtier of,Partners by Type of Partnership and Profit.Statius, Tax YearsI 903~-'l 992(Numbers are in thousandsl
Jax year.. . Total
M
T,ype of pa~inarehip
'General'
Gain ' ',(2)
Loss
(3)
1983- ............ 10,589 2,939 2,216
1984 ............... 12,427 3,527 2,215
t,985 ........... 13,245 2,990 2,3401986 ....... 15,301 3,061 -~2,426
q. 1987 ................ 16,463 3.185 2.2~5
1988............ 17,291 '3,421 2,1971 :49............... .. 18,432 .3,150 2,0581 90.......... 17,095 ~1,1102 2,007
1991 ............... 15.601,' 1 2,714 .1~822
1992 ............. :. 15,735- 1,713
NOTE:, Detail may not add to totals because of r6unding.
Gain
ited - ' '
Losg(5)
Lim
. '(4) '
2,4883,0823,6804,7096,054
6,6647,656
2,9473,6034,2345,1055,469
5,0095,568
7,180 4; 06.6,605 4,:616,337 4,977
Partnership Returns, 1992
Figure E
Limited Partnerships and General Partnerships: Selected Items for Selected Industrial Groups[All figures are estimates based on samples--money amounts are in thousands of dollars]
Tax year, industrial group
1992All Industries' ....................................................
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing..............................
Oil and gas extraction ..........................................
Construction............................................................Manufacturing..........................................................Transportation and public utilities............................Wholesale and retail trade .......................................Finance, insurance, and real estate.........................
Real estate..........................................................Operators and lessors of buildings..................
1991All Industries' ....................................................
Agriculture, forestry, and fishing..............................
Oil and gas extraction..........................................
Manufacturing ..........................................................Transportation and public utiltites ............................Wholesale and retail trade.......................................
Finance, insurance, and real estate .........................
Real estate..........................................................Operators and lessors of buildings ..................
Numberof returns
-0)
270,7488,576
15,14514,0252,4781,6314,103
12,649203,587167,424133,369
22,576
270,6819,780
16,29515,1491,4061,9463,797
13,640201,502162,890134,481
22,232
Limited partnerships
Numberof partners
(2)
Net income(loss deficit)
D)
-3,277,692-43,585
2,040,0281,990,619-150,226411,136
-240,277765,383
-6,289,429-17,186,165-13,579,304
217,371
11,313,483172,616
1,196,9781,170,310
28,772170,319448,26884,962
7,762,8985,470,9514,890,2731,448,645
11,265,537219,931
1,198,2401,162,041
28,003126,447439,268
96,7797,674,1675,218,0114,736,7831,481,958
ITotwal i cludes partnerships whose principal business activity could riot be deternune .
net income (less deficit) for all partnerships. Over half ofthe net income (less deficit) for partnerships classified inservices was attributable to legal services, with medicaland health services a distant second ($7.3 billion), fol-lowed by accounting, auditing, and bookkeeping services($4.2 billion). Profits for all of these groups were up for1992.
Real Estate Operatom and Lessom of Buildingsand Rental Real Estate IncomeAlthough its impact on total partnership losses haslessened, the real estate operators and lessors of build-ings industry still remains the most important overallindustry for these partnership statistics, accounting for 38percent of the total assets for all partnerships (Figure F).In addition, almost one-third of all partnerships andalmost one-half of all partners are classified in thisindustry. Even though the number of partnerships in thisindustry remained relatively constant over the 1983-1992decade at between 32 and 36 percent of all partnerships,1992 marked the fourth consecutive year for which their
.16,702,278-242,252
1,790,2791,840,527-312,608-614,965
-2,177,849378,997
-13,769,218-22,224,989-17,978,664
-1,754,293
Numberof returns
(4)
1,214,004115,988
21,25417.79456,93322,44319,433
149,823593,736490,381400,344229,941
1,244,665117,293
22,72819,03155,78922,02822,309
157,342602,335506,077410,722238,217
General partnershi
Numberof partners
(5)
4,421,208331,701191,629173,556129,162
54,58179,082
340,4192,565,2241,815,7151,452,535
717,999
4,535,511331,784216,247197,487123,68948,71079,874
351,0552,642.3481,883,4821,489,667
724,531
s
Not income(less deficit)
(6)
46,194,3402,270,624-1,031,403-1,270,6912,056,0121,458,6771,293,8761,787,4085,537,5721,825,7633,445,910
32,786,982
38,108,8851,981,930
-1,010,792-1,201,3811,806,3801,519,294
746,5092,249,053
982,822-3,395,851
-619,36829,790,360
number declined (Table 5).This same group, which historically accounted for a
dominant portion of the losses recorded for all partner-ships, was responsible for almost 40 percent ($8.5 billion)of the total increase in profits ($21.5 billion) for all part-nerships (Figure A). Real estate operators and lessors ofbuildings, as a group, accounted for 19 percent of the gainsand 43 percent of the losses reported by all partnerships.Gains alone for the group rose, for 1992, to $23.7 billion,up $1.6 billion, or 7 percent. Losses dropped dramatically(17 percent) for 1992, from $40.7 billion, for 1991, to$33.8 billion, continuing the trend of declining losses thatstarted in 1990. Losses declined 8 and 15 percent for theperiods 1989-1990 and 1990-1991, respectively (1989,$52.2 billion; 1990, $47.8 billion).
The 1992 increase in the net profits for this industrywas largely due to a 41 percent ($11.7 billion) increase inreal estate rental income (less loss), from $-28.6 billion for1991 to $46.9 billion for 1992. Over three-fourths of thisincrease was attributable to partnerships classified in thereal estate operators and lessors of buildings industry. 77
Partnership.Retums, 1992
Figure F
Partnership Total Assets and Receipts, by Industrial Groupings, Tax Year 1992
Agriculture, forestry'and fishing (2%) Mining (3%)
Construction (1%)Serviciews (9%)'
. Agriculture, forestry, and~ fishing (2%)
Real estate operators andlessore of bulldl"s,
(8%)
Total Receipts
'includes partnerships whose principal business activity could not be determined.2Exdudei total assets of certain small partnerships not required tD file balance sheets.NOTE: Peroenta6es may not add to totals bemuse of rounding.
Manufacturing (41%)
Transportation and publicutilities (41%)
Wholesale and retail trade(2%) z
Partnership Returns, 1992
VVhile net rental income for all partnerships went up from$20.2 billion in 1991 to $22.2 billion in 1992, it was thedrop in net rental loss, from $48.7 billion in 1991 to $39.1billion in 1992 that was most significant. The majority ofthis increase in net rental income (less loss) was caused bya $5.6 billion increase in gross rental income, from $148.0billion for 1991 to $153.6 billion. Also contributing tothis increase was a $4.8 billion decrease in the interestdeduction, from $65.2 billion in 1991 to $60.4 billion in1992 (Table 3). The number of partnerships reportingrental income on Forms 8825 dropped from 634,309 for1991 to 624,512 for 1992, a decline of 1.5 percent, afterhaving dropped by 7 percent over the entire previous 3years. (Rental real estate income and expenses items arereported on the Form 8825, Rental Real Estate Incomeand Expenses ofa Partnership or an S Corporation,attached to partnership returns.)
Total Assob and Total RecelptsTable 2 presents balance sheet data by industrial groupand by profit status for partnerships required to filebalance sheets with their returns. Approximately 7percent of partnerships -- generally partnerships with bothtotal receipts and total assets of less than $250,000 -- werenot required to file balance sheets. Over the 1980-1989period, reported total assets grew in 7 of the 9 years.Almost 80 percent of the overall growth during that periodoccurred in finance, insurance, and real estate. While onlymodest annual growth rates occurred for 1990 (1 percent)and for 1991 (2 percent), for 1992 total assets for allpartnerships grew by 5 percent ($90.8 billion) to $1.9trillion. Nearly 60 percent of the 1992 increase occurredin the finance, insurance, and real estate division. Most ofthis increase was concentrated within the security andcommodity brokers and service industry, as well as theholding and investment company industry.
Total receipts increased slightly over 6 percent or$37.2 billion, to $648.8 billion (see the Explanation ofTerms section for the definition of total receipts). Most ofthe increase was due to "business receipts," i.e., grossreceipts from sales and operations, especially in theservices division ($13.3 billion), manufacturing ($12.8billion), wholesale and retail trade ($8.1 billion), andtransportation and public utilities ($4.5 billion). Thereceipts in services accounted for 30 percent of thepartnership total. Business receipts for finance, insurance,and real estate were not significant in the statistics becausemost of the operating income of these partnerships is notincluded in business receipts, but in other types of incomesuch as rental income.
DlsfflbuUons to ParWorsPartnerships are not taxed. Instead, their income, credits,and deductions flow through to the partners who are liablefor the tax. Partners may be individuals, corporations,other partnerships, tax-exempt organizations, nominees, orother legal entities. Table 4 presents data on the distribu-tions (or allocations) of partnership income (or losses) tolimited and general partners by industrial division. Thesedata were obtained from Schedule K of the partnershipreturn which reports the partners' shares of each sepa-rately allocable component of the partnership'sdistributive income, deductions, and tax credits, as totalsand by type of partner. The amounts distributed orallocated reflect the ownership shares of partnershipincome (or loss) by the various types of partners.
For 1992, the total amount of income (less loss)available for distribution -- without regard to separatelyallocable deductions -- increased 34 percent, from $68.6billion to $91.6 billion. Deductions increased by $0.5billion to $22.9 billion. The difference betweeq theincome (less loss) and deductions resulted in $68.7 billionavailable for distribution or allocation to partners. Of thisamount, $59.6 billion (87 percent) was actually identifiedby type of partner. The difference was due to partnershipswhich failed to report distributions or allocations by typeofpartner.
Individuals who were general partners were the princi-pal category of income recipients for every industrialdivision except mining and transportation and publicutilities. For n-Lining, distributions or allocations weremostly to general partners that were corporations and tolimited partners that were partnerships. For transportationand public utilities corporate general partners and tax-exempt organization general partners predominated.
Even though the real estate industry group producedlosses for its partners, general partners who were individu-als received positive income of nearly $7.0 billion, upfrom $2.5 billion for 199 1. Individual limited partnerswere still characterized by net losses. For 1992, these netlosses amounted to $2.3 billion, a one-third increase overthe $1.7 billion reported for individual limited partners for1991.
SunnnaryAlthough both the number of partnerships and partnersdeclined slightly for 1992, net income (less deficit)doubled to $42.9 billion, the largest increase in recentyears (Table 5). This increase was the net result of an$8.4 billion increase in positive net income and a $13.4billion decrease in the net deficit. Real estate operatorsand lessors of buildings, an industry group prominent in
79
80
Partnership Returns, 1992
"tax sheltering", activities'6f the earl to inid71980's;-accounted'for* 40 r~erc' n't 6f the $24.5 billion in-crease intotal Oaktnership hetincome. (less deficit). The increase inthe* overall ~rofits of partneishi6s for 1992 wd's inainlycaused by.incieased. real:estate rental revenues, aIs well asb 'the deci ed in
.ter6st.-deductiorts assodiatedvith thesey reits
revenues.- I-n ad
Iditi6n, the ser
.vice's division continued.
,to
p.receipts, tintingdominite-the statistics for partn6rshi accofor 3,0*06rc.ent of thetotal.
Most of the Pre7tax reform tax shelter activityoccurredthrough us6 of limited partnerships. Although thenimberoflinut6d partnerships-'remained fai.rly.co,nstant, theyacco fited f6k.63.p~6rc6itt of the.increase in net income(less deficit) for the year.
Sahiple Selection -Tax:~Year - 1992 statistics are estimates based on a stratified'probability -sample of slightly over 29,000 returns selectedfrom.,a p6pulati6n,of
.a
,pproxirfiately 1'.~ ~mfliion p̀artner
-ships,.- Tax,Year i992 covers 'returns processed by- the
Internal Revenue'- Service.during Calendar, Year, 1993. All
partnerships engaged in business in, or hdving.jncomefro "in- sources within, the-United States, we
.r
Ie
"required to
Al -'a ~6rm ~ 1065, U.S. Partnership. Retum.bfMcome,.to
-rep6rt.iricoMeor:16ss,ded6ct.ions, -tax .6;relditsand other,tax-related items generated- by. the partnership,., TheStAtistics.areonly for -active partnerships.Awbich~.ar'e'defined as those that reported any items of income ordeduction derived from a'trdde'or_-bus'iness,.or fromsental .:or portfolio,: inc,,ome.,'rhp
sample was stratified. intOrclasses~based'on sizeOf total assets, receipts, net income (or deficit) a:nd indus-tr~.:'Returns Were selected from these classes at various~p
.robabilkies ranging from 0.12'percelit, t6 percent,
and were weighted to represent the'total population.Or6ximate y perc of he' reittims, selected4or this .Ap ~nt ' t'
sarnple~w-ere* not'in'c'luded in, the tabulations ~b6cause theyreptesented.iriactivei, partnerships orbebauS6 multiple
'been freturns had Red by the same partnership-,Because the data presented- in this article- are based
on a sample of returns, they.,are subject to: s,ampling error.To--propprly,usel the'data, the magnitude of the potentialIsam ling effor:needs to be-known. Coefficients of varia-.tion (CV's) are used,to rheasure this magnitude. Figure Gpresents the' coefficients.of Viiriation-for certain:moneyamounts, for selected industrial groups. The smaller thecoefficient of variation, the, more reliable the estimate isjudged to be-[8].
ExplaMtlon of'Selected',Terms.."A
.ssas and Liabilittes.7-`B.alance sheet. informati
Ion' had..
: be provided, in generato nilylif the p,artnership, had total
Figure G
Indushisl Groups irid Items, Tax.Year 1992
CDeff icients of variation
Industrial group.Total
Tot
salariesassets
t
and waglesdeduction
NI Industflal dMslons............. . ............. .... 0.0704 0.007
Agricufture~fonastry, and lishjng..;~ ......................... 0.041 0.091
Mining.................................................... ; .................... 0.020 0.073
Construction..~..... ............ : .................................... 0.045 0.074
Manufacturing..:: ..................................................... 0.007 .0.015
Transportation and public utilities.; ........................ 0.013 0.022
W-iolirsale and retail trade...................................... 0.017 0.023
~Rnance, insurance. and real estate:
'Real estate operators and lessors of
........................................buildings......... 0.009 0.104
Otherfinance, insurance, and real estate
(except operators and lessorsIofbuild" 0.006 . 0.024
Services .......................... ...................... 0.010 0.010
Coefficients.of
item vahatidn--ccntinued
(3) -
Number of. partnershps ......................................... :0.005
Nurnber of partn ers7--*
0.024.
:Receipts 0.003
Portfolio 6.015
Cost of sales and operations ................................. 0.005'
Depredation............... ............................................ 0.007
Taxes paid dedti6ti6n .................... ;.t: ..................... _01007
Not incorne ............. .......................................... 0.007
Nit deficit....................................... : ....................... .
~
0.016
,r&.ceipts a0d.toW assets of $250,000 or more. No attempt
was-made -to.estimate the assets andiiabilities of those notre,quired"to.proVide this information Although effortswere~made to ov'dr6o' the0fects of-nonuniforni,MeTeliorting, especially by firms t.hat,used balance sheets of.their own design instead of that provided on the return,certain anomalies - were acciepied;"e.g.,1wh6n a.negativeamountwas,repoited for an asset ouliabilityr account.
Tartners.-- Partners can',be, indiIviduals, comorations,
other parinerships,'"o"r. any 6ther legal entiiy.. Partners areclassified as'either general or limited. General partnersar
.e.those'who.'as§ume liability for, the partnership" s debts
and losses. Limited~pa;q'nersdrIe thosewhose liability. in
die partnership' does notI, exceed their in-vestment, By
definition, a~ partnership must. have atleast two partners, atleast one of which
,hill
.st.be a g
Ie"nieral partner. A general
pa.Irtnership is composed, entirely
Iof partners who arep
general partners. A limited partnershi'o, has at least onegeneral partner and one or more limited partners.
Partrierships.-- A partnership is the relationship be-tween two or more entities or. persons which join to carryon a,.trade or business, with,e6ch.pildner contributingmoney; property, labor, ~or skilfhndekh expecting to
.-share in the Profits and losses.'..Every partnership that
Partnership Returns, 1992
engages in a trade or business or has income from sourcesin the United States must file an annual informationreturn, Form 1065, U.S. Partnership Return of Income,with the Internal Revenue Service, showing thepartnership's taxable income or loss for the year. Apartnership must file even if its principal place of businessis outside the United States or if all its members arenonresident aliens.
Partnership Net Income (Less Deficit), Through TaxYear 1986 partnership net income (less deficit) represents"ordinary income" (loss). Beginning with Tax Year 1987(because of tax law changes and form revisions), a similarnet income (less deficit) figure has been computed forStatistics of Income as the sum of. ordinary income or lossfrom trade or business, portfolio income distributeddirectly to partners (excluding net short-term and long-term capital gains and losses and other portfolio income),net income or loss from rental real estate activities, andnet income or loss from other rental activities. The sum ofthese components is a comprehensive measure of overallpartnership profits which enables comparisons to be madewith amounts of net income (less deficit) reported foryears prior to 1987. The profit status of partnerships isdetermined as the sum of the gains or losses from the fouractivities listed above. Partnerships with a breakevenbetween gains and losses are included with loss partner-ships.
Receipts, Total receipts, for this article, is defined asthe positive income (negative amounts or losses are notincluded) received by partnerships for the specific itemslisted below. For 1992, total receipts of partnershipsconsisted of. gross receipts or sales less returns andallowances, i.e., "business receipts" in the statistics;ordinary income from other partnerships and fiduciaries;net farm profit; net ordinary gain from sales of businessproperty; other income from a trade or business; netincome from rental real estate activities; net income fromother rental activities; portfolio interest income; portfoliodividend income; portfolio royalty income; net short-termcapital gain; net long-term capital gain; other portfolioincome; net gain from sales or exchanges of property usedin a trade or business (Internal Revenue Code section1231); and other income except that from trade or busi-ness. Therefore, total receipts differs from the totalreceipts presented in Table 11 in the Selected Historicaland Other Data section of this issue in that certain incomeand deductions distributed or allocated directly to partnersis excluded in the latter.
Notes and References[11 For information about partnerships for other recent
years, see Wheeler, Timothy D., "PartnershipReturns, 1991," Statistics of Income Bulletin, Fall1993, Volume 13, Number 2; Shekhter, Elaina,"Partnership Returns, 1990," Statistics of IncomeBulletin, Summer 1992, Volume 12, Number 1;Petska, Tom, "Partnerships, Partners, and TaxShelters after Tax Reform, 1987-1989," Statistics ofIncome Bulletin, Summer 1992, Volume 12, Number1; and Zempel, Alan, "Partnership Returns, 1989,"Statistics of Income Bulletin, Fall 1991, Volume 11,Number 2.
[21 U.S. Congress, Joint Committee on Taxation, Tax
[31
Reform Proposals: Tax Shelters and Minimum Tax(JCS-34-85), August 7, 1985, page 2.
Nelson, Susan, "Taxes Paid by High-Income Taxpay-ers and the Growth of Partnerships, 1983," Statisticsof Income Bulletin, Fall 1985, Volume 5, Number 2.
[4] Dworin,'Lowell, "An Analysis of PartnershipActivity, 1981-83," Statistics of Income Bulletin,Spring 1986, Volume 5, Number 4.
[5] U.S. Congress, Joint Committee on Taxation,General Explanation of the Tax Reform Act of 1986(H.R. 3838, 99th Congress; Public Law 99-514), May4,1987.
[61 Nelson, Susan, "Noncorporate Business Taxation:
[71
Before and After the Tax Reform Act of 1986," OTAPaper 59, Office of Tax Analysis, U.S. Department ofthe Treasury, May 1988.
For further information about passive losses and theeffects of the Tax Reform Act, see Petska, Tom,"Further Examinations of Tax Shelters in the Post-Reform World," 1991 Proceedings of the AmericanStatistical Association, Section on Survey ResearchMethods; Petska, Tom and Nelson, Susan, "Partner-ships and Tax Shelters: An Analysis of the Impact ofthe 1986 Tax Reform," 1990 Proceedings of theAmerican Statistical Association, Section on SurveyResearch Methods; Nelson, Susan and Petska, Tom,"Partnerships, Passive Losses, and Tax Reform,1981-1987," Statistics of Income Bulletin, Winter1989-1990, Volume 9, Number 3.
[8] For details on the sample design, see McMahon, Paul,O'Conor, Karen V. and Collins, Richard, "Revisingthe Statistics of Income Partnership Sampling Plan,"1990 Proceedings of the American StatisticalAssociation, Section on Survey Research Methods;
81
Partnership Returns, 1,992
McMahon, Paul, "Siatistic~ of Income, PartnershipStudies; Sampling Plan Redesign 11," 1991 Proceed-ings.of the American Statistical Association,- Sectionon Survey Research Methods; or McMahon, Paul,
"Statistics of Income Partnership Studies: Evaluationof the Revised Sampling Plan," 1993 Proceedings ofthe American Statistical Association, Section onSurvey Research Methods.
a
82
Partnership
Returns,
1992
I
ZEV
lmt:juuou-moniig
I;gW
5909
AP
-4ag
ria-31,11 -I
Is14
if
it11
21H
.1.11Z
a9aaa
Viot
-91MIkkMM91MR.&RI
-:g-:gtWOVE-
-x
akR414
-115F~
V:
VI%
AS
Sa
01W,xq,xRkk
An
G-;
0N
av;
1:-*;;
MC
M~cc
14-19
--"
g-
CiA
i--M
mm
83
Partnership
Returns,
1992
0CL
2t0E0aCE0E0a*
cCL0Vr,
0'CcIE0
00
EEE
!R
CLIM
MIX
...
5s.
2!
illv
~?I-
v,
otP%rz
w
SO
M*V
12
Ot
Ncy~
Ak..&
,95?
A.Is
14-11!
R
a
i's-
F,~, 2- 9.
1aI
;-ZIIf
9.;
NiR
&RAF
159PnEEO.nfir_ed
9!e
Wig
,ga-
MP
8R
NIN
N
9499
9969.
dN'
Nil
N,
Nc%r
7,cj
N6
Us
-1
ViO
US
"ME
RH
UH
CLc1t
fCd
q
c64.;
I§
9
Partnership
Returns,
1992
E0S0
SIPE;k
C
eH
L
RZ
E
Z
mV
Sm
4,
rci
~4;g
g.
zd
6M
-4m
SA
M-41
ES
aR
E
.6a4.Z
Gi dd
i6v
21
R-00
r-:
.1E
PP
C40
mc6
c-~S0
adoid
9vi
N
16
ci
wi
vV
Zak
RR
RR
-R
VCIL
r%q
K
-5,2
;:6041,
%-`,
P.o
w9;
clicli
c!'d
ggd~
ic6N,6
~:64M166
Or:f
3v9!
9-d
'idjg
cici
~tk
m~:
5v
m~
dm
L6c6
6~i
ItV
.3icid
-w
Vv
d4
v9ci
so~
vN
aii
-N
EO-Z
REzEP
.-aDo
.6j!
jIE
WO
oI
I-
ii
!i.
II
Ig
0E
cF§S
ISvi
Ez
wZ
MS
.Z
z
Z-E
z85
Partnership
Retuim
s,1992
.414If
il
j,I'.
CLI
.,
E-
kam:141zall
5fPZ
-of
~-
ci
voullk
affiffi
PH
IMPA
l,HF.'4'R
RR
Ico
-5
~-1 IVdof
15UP
MR
f .U11H
RR
90cioa
coFe6
-:
-1
.1n
C4
H-
S!0
d
Wv
V
lplP
fAl
WA
MA
.11"ItO
EM
ofN
-5OOF
IRri. c
i~I
]v
-AC;
C6a
0;d
8::W
WF
W~
-71p2g.1~
cd
d4
'"I
;. mg
VP
IVI
a~
1.1
1k
co17.
.~ I
L8LF
F
fill
H'I
titt
C9
9:9,vtI
tt
tV
8tt
II
I
CAO
1
MaH
0815Har-O
txIt
It
tit
I
t~
MW
CO
WIM
HC
MI
'8-V
9.
a
je12
Hm
P1I
gill
4w
w9bilseir
s
I
7AI
EFU
.qsj
ouuu
clZ6
61ls
wm
o-d
dT
Partnership
Returns,
1992
Ia
gi"M
OU
RV
IGW
kM
004
V~~!!
:1~
v~
Zg
(6,-
C4N
:7
tit
,z-
c6c!
N.
cm
It
imG
.9;9
Ilk
tzrz
C4a
n"i
''
Cm
.91
k9
~~
&d99
!~ePR
:;
C46
kR
10
ia;vi
IqUZ
A1
94
FSI
Pig
o'
FF
ocic'!
ci.a
Sn
H-1
~P
Gdv~
-zz
ea
da
gas
IIq
jR
ag
j'I
8.T
w=
-F@
-W
Ucq
Zq0
IE
:M
.k'
NOa
6Cq
FL'
q9
,ok
cGicq!i
aI!N
ku
I
w
IL
E
Z.2
rDLD
1H
Eco
01
r-"ic
ri'a
w-M
ifE
S191
fi
wz
zaii
ll.,
t[S
ti
~S
zjz
cS
c:Ea:H
51
zz
z
Partnership
Returns,
1992
Is
~vj~
.:~I
a,~
~-I
II
CLv
-q-:q
015:989M
M,
ci;
v;
E
o
.0
2
Rim
qMH
ci
99:S
toi
Ai
~:
:i
iE
,5i
iE
i
M0
..1
..
::
-
~Jfsggj
v.~
0a.
t5
iLi
NE
j.GI
MA
Mz
I
I
iE
mo
z2z
in
EI
g:2
19
X-C
9999aa
4C-1
00
ommu
Rmkzl-~§
k*'X1la
xkk
UU
M""n
01
Iti:t
'ZM
M""M1~
69
ad.
:~99
cm
aH~Mfl
Ci9
StP
90
Iq-
v0-
4q_J,A~~MM'~Hvw"XHFMX
R!SUM!
og~kl~99-
PCa
SiIV-
CIL't
6N
-
MUMMact
pl~0
E:2
gigm
RVF~
ZA
IRR
M-4&
-j6C
4'ji
82
AFG
0a;
P:m
106
Ir-7
CIEit0"
c4
II
m;:
v.
R.
--
RR
I118120""M
WM
Mc,v
g,;.6ma
.igg
iS
4~
~;,
-6LI;
A
q~t-
%17
~:-a-MR
FAk~~`2~:I~4z'VI
cp;vN
Z.
;i0
.2A
89
Partnership
Returns,
1992
V1tll
~ 914&
;;cll;i
I
.11119,91
RA
MA
CY
viK
-ifthaggil
8
-91=1915,111FIRIN
va~§Rgm
lmnum
iqlp
igI
Ci
n
-,
kS
ir.-
4ilfV
r,;
:e-
IQ
Uc!t
.5219
Ir
3H
iC6
C4
,] ILq
cc
9
944
~~IZ
NI5~EY
R
v;ej
ZFMW
g4E
gig
i-qa
ag
0co
Mika
PA
RO
M-U
Cq
01
f-EEZU
gillvlo
.vglu
lm
om
4z
R!`g
gjg
xCM
-K
SlA
KK
Partnership
Returns,
1992
10
1
11
19
Al
Iq
III
H2119AIIi9
1,
ja
gla
mIR
&I
6.q9g;--7!k-:A
t4vaig
-R
a-
fliz
HA
C'r
!k
M~Sfflq
19
;:jg~V-Rd-dgdas
*P!91
In
111
15
kwkffiFR
-154
-2A
N'l!'~
HK
M-M
--1
0==
S
i4iig
942%
0W'494,-
Ra
Av
MRa-
W1:
IRS
:fIa
cd
IIIp
r~.Ixoq
tnU
MW
''iUR
RM
,IRA
i&
Ivc"g
vt
48'4
0 -7agg-
g
as
&U.-SM,
I
91
Partnership
Retum
s,1992g
RI
21n
..
~.
.,q
E0US
-am0v
E
-:;ft~
iga
Rt2
dj
:!c
leCd
M~m
cidg
,iN
--
-U
R.
wo.
..
..
..
W.:4:
_N6
vo
sCt
-I
t-,,-;f
'PE
N-
"&,9
:1_-q
; 2,~!A:f9
g~9ci
tz.
vq
I,-
N.1w~:MFMOSRAS
..
..
..
..
..
9;e
OM
A;e
11.:.a
rt
b'It9
::1
ail
29
~E
jj_n
~j
II
H811
Eg
1I
z.
V
99
00,
got
Qi,N
st 6F
Paftnership
Retum
s,1992
g;i'i'dd
v
0%;~q
C"iltA
MM
'sci
-Z16
dK
Z1:
161:
aO
do
4k
-aE
i--2
0cl;
11
V:
V%
~;2
aEe
ed7
d'i
civ
cqI's
Rk
IqN
F!
isR
g
,tpt Nt
r-~ve
opy-mv
Ram
No
-7N
;!Rm
--
..
.cq
!wkp
I't&Rm4zvp--
ci-
~q't
rov
~&
P.
:.!I
Doi-M
OL-
M§19H
i'MilsoU
6rt
S3;;
c;2
4cd
eg
a;
c;
-N
No
99
17
6cj
clkIq
ww
t2N
ocj
1:d
mN
It-
-M
va
mN
m
6a
v
"qR
clLqm16
t2IR
RZc-4:
Fjk 2N
v;.6K
c4
m-ZR
DiN
noa
qvNO 9
-sitOdpz
c6K
cq:2c
a;z
va
dV
;;vm
mi,
zw
si
1
~I
E121
i!
i1
1i
1i
-~~
a~
J~~8
iie
E
-Zr=
ii
E
W.
S
o
ZILEU
EZ
d:CD
zE
ZZ8
ZZ
z9
ccz
93
Partnership
Returns,
1992
o0)
C4m
a(
il
1-4
Na
c6Id
F:f,
Q6
16
4c6
ci
05
ILEm
.f.6
dC6
1,Wvi
aHIM
ia
:m
cN-V
g.
ci0
PZ~r
1:cc;
-RJR
ykF
MM
UM
11X
RR
"R
c§6v
'q
Ayf~
11
FlI
1115MMM
II
d7
I9;
NL
lt~
G9
g.
~I
Fvi
P-I
EM
i0
x9
461-:
1~:P:q
z'd
!f'
§9
1i
Na
a;;9
59
91;
Vgn
9i
:.I
_R
16re-,
om
m
Z~
S'
C4i;~
'
&law
wilk
41
1?111&1
.111k
coV
vN
M
max
130
g-fa
mv
r~"
v
MIME!
EA
ccc
Ej
ix(C
z
94
Partnership
Returns,
1992
I
iIm11i
99Eaa
!I
E~U
~~E
V11-04A
a!
Ii?
'~II
RI
A0;-
8$3
-ij
u5qM
,6M
-99R
g-
9-713
Fjcc
--
.0W
A:
ci0;
0
"40114W
MR
1.1z,co
CL
M~
fa
13H
I~I
IV
aiI
Us
I11n
[WR
MU
MM
I139
~n
dq4fa%-
.73~fVI
1km
mm
uU
-W
:"1j4
VF
inva
ss-moz
ME
V.
CLq
L;.f!l
wco
~w
-Cc
CMco
.0N
0'm
In
kk
;5mumn?
96lWMMrR
Emu
IR--9
C199
.6T
5
95
Partnership
Returns,
1992
k-
.0-
cc~
~
E0.0
I
Ii~;99&~i
isqk11,
u-1~RkiaF01
zRVI
I":
--
..
-.
IIq
lzz;6
v~
g1
R::m
91S
Q19,1
8V
1.1
W;
Ia
ci
..
lcr
._~.
-71
...1
1
R9,1~
91A
49
29
2r--:1
-91!RR
Eco
tcq
Ci31
~0
-.
E~
~H
EI
P:i ~6
~v
~,
MIq
--~FI,9
l;,!lHH
lmM
6F~:
I.
..
I.
I.
..
..
.q
-L
..
I'l
"j,64.f.g12
~-'-~-:W~9
J-L-
-.
a."
V_V.
MI.`
Rigum
.uu
qZR
O~
4d
!21
ENEMIM&FRIVI
vC;
9N
0-7
~;i6g
-I-
-_.,,
__
.
otIqN
NV
HMMI
MISR
Ldq
q;~
Ht?
9N
-~wl
H-
~w
-N
cfii
cjcj
-."
I.
i;
a?!v
RIF
Alm
XV
aR;
NV
V.
aR
.11.,
Partnership
Returns,
1992
ws-m
isF
ur-w
Riu
ma
Iq-q
RG91~6.`
919
996-6-V44 -
91~99
A8R
o
Cl
UK
3191HRMIRNWH
'F:RkZH11§
II9M99-
21
Vol
g~'f9
V8
98V
92W21VI
-00
c;~4
ci
cicq
CItN
:!'99
091
dcq6
99
i9
9F
04~
tU:
-N
N
,RES;
Va.:;;
iVag
rz.ug
'q.1
.1~q
ftMt
.-'L
.q
Iqi
MHz
19-
H
cici
c;
0cGq
aR.
;:I
,~
;'~I
19
M
iv
VV
'6
-M
,In
uio
a9
c6t
9-
--
a66,6
i1
.4-
~g
o-
Nq
A4
ci-
Vcj
N't
CLn
clt"t
qcq
--
-V
cq't
R"q
c!v
WW
M0
NV
M!q
IM
01
11
0;c;
c6i
-7s
csc4
aa
cig
ga
r-MMN
all
vo
~..~
sW
AA
10V
Ii3-~z
_Iq-P
%q
ct~~i
WNq
a
is
is
toi
.1,A
BE
j
VE
0L
W'z
EI
2-
ScIr
zz
OS
PIS
IZ
IT
EM
zz
z
97
Partnership
Returns,
1992
11
k-
P~
~k
V~
Ikx
a8-
Nag
,
me;-H
iN*SIG
R
Z
C11
EqE
RI-4
3f.
a;w
ei
mC2
crN
v;ci
co":;g
Si16
9?m
g
Aa
R~
K4
Qicd
00
vci
".0
00
cl)
10
1
CJg
N2
NW
0w
a;ci
r~
US
41,
11
M1W
IN
0I~
i1
0T
GR
A
ef6
.i
1V
I.
aV
,
11
11
114
1I'l
I
0G
ro
1In
II
II
II
II
ci
a0;
Partnership
Returns,
1992
II
A!M
111RIM11
lk&vq
Ia
1!M
II
I~
kc4!41§41111111
V~:
RU
fi
Acli
'kG
iR
-0N
vo
-139"
1v
aIT
M
a999IE9a9aa
,159"wenem
'Ri%
..
..
da
::'i
Nd
46
C6
23
lie
ME
-;&
v
vIt
WN
w-
FIRlk
FI4R.
9.56-:111U
WH
AF
MP
.,
§Pl
-ful"?
k1&IV
Riv-pill9RII-MU111=0
CdC4
wvj
gigH
aam
a0
Ffguqus~
R§
kF1§xRRRER
ZR
&P
wai
.2
R
RIF
RRedl
~!
':.
..
..
..
..
.I
.k"R
;;ag
igs
dci
RR
Iig
II
IR
vilfff
I.
11,19R.HH11,
11...
~v
II
II
II
I
M422
qu,nali
95IR
~PEI
fig49 -
kqk--5
avt
-:1O
W"R
EC4
d0
0a
IPz
off11§Wum
..
..
..
CIL-
C~at
akum
mig
nig
of:-
IqIt
a9
-714
ai
gas
'rV
F44
ann
xP1
0F~W
99
Partnership
Returns,
1992
Ml?
9V6W
g:
%a
2:
cli4~
-.
POV
'i
ov9-1Ldd
99
VVIl
0G
v0
gigm
FM
ub~Ck
Kci
gw
~A
0A
.ClN
0-o
pt
Ct-
--
I-
--
ciw
090
0m
t2LqcilN~
-li
Ali-
3ul
Ct
--
--
--q
F.:0
Nck-c:r
mo
mv
Ciw
wm
vm
.~
0
F1
9?so
Iv
I-rt!
t~9
mr'St
0.
..
...
..
..
4RV
dd
cl;
G1%
0
-s
R
crC'T
88
8;m
mCIL
0.0
00
..
.m
clLpt
-qm
N6
cl;ci
0vz
6
m0
c6l'_6
ORII
w
j
c0
V
'rI
i1z
z
Partnership
Returns,
1992
5.E
>
2
V.IsIF
H2*9
I'VIM
,.6
d.6
g.6
.6'S
iag
eaS
ig
g'
.~
g
a14
Inn
vi6
cim
cj
N
:gdci
:.;
dag
gI
51
A
c;V
.;g
ag
ag`.;
d~.6g
-~nnn
-nn
Rk
zX
vqV-!
NNIV
MM
149U
RM
g`i
gg
g9
'I
99~6"x
".N~t~R:
'"vZ
93
1218cli
clRcli
'R4n
V6
g'd
'iP;,6:'i
g6
d6
gZ.4
RZ
V
;'Z~V
.6.I-
.~t
Gwa
aU
WE
Ftv;2-2.g~
gal
~icj:f'd
!i~;gd
civ
F,vI
N.vg
g
lq:~q
.4n
ckc~
-121Gi -Z
'U~
Itq
--iq
R
'EE
aF
RR
,S
~;z
Ii
E9
IVI
R~i
aZ
~q
av,R
6F
Ri
SR
IRI
N2
~i
cli-:d
&N
dI:d
.6d
:fa16
2.
c6't
H"96
zi
':6
~i
Iq
qI
-tq-k
cli6q
q-t
-qcz
R,1
5q
Ea
II
aR
1H
XM
"-'~
S26
_,d
Zg
~6'~g
.6g
'zCS d
da
g;,d
g!
gg
gag
g.;
~~4
zusz
Za.
ke
cmt
2l
A:H
E3
pa
JEI
g!
0o
't39
m0
5-
~mozm
Ez
z0
.8..8
9E
zzz
0z
itz
1110,
Partnership
Reftim
s,1992
1~H
.pcq
cj:
&
lici
lici-
1;7f,
q
clR
FU
MB4.z
ISO
RU
U~
4W
AR
FA
Ii`
~6'k
z
-91V
Kc;
al
gq
daq
jd2o
-q
ccrsi
49
114
:9d
FA
$V
cc
If
M91
Mns§
wq
qm
If
lln
f§~
IF
AW
HR
IIIp
q;!@
~j
ag-eg-
ge
-qP
tNR
-tR
~:d
iI
9911F
gag
-v
k-i
sil2
g6
9
Partnership
Returns,
1992
Ww1
20%2,10.5
9E
.rk
aE
Icoco1. 1C%l
2
1=;z
19§IlkU1ge
I "!k;z44
S1n
ag
cin
-L
IWOAll
t-mw;,kv
11 EiI-i'Pie
R
9
-19
dS
mgF
-9.5fit
IL
I
EI
R].01.19F24f.
ja
R:RlF
IQW
,!~!g
140
v
II
99-t
Rigq0R:
C%F
Si:1
"P-MROURRUNN
RogVL,N;
aln
RE,ci
go
ci
of
11O
HM
-g
R-2`4"
cl
IA~-VRIIVII
RIWIS
4q
.1111r.
.vim:211=18gg
4e
cl
Partnership
Returns,
1992
H
.312
7v
6f
'Ila
g~11A
knk.-R
IS.9
8F
ci-.6
Of='gEll
o
0c.9Eo
cc
C.4
L v.
,z04
1-0 ~_E
E0iEHoS
A9:9
da".6
w6
a.,i
;ZrSV
'8;6'9
-9aID41
IV's
VN
26;
ci.~:6
cli
RaI
K9
9H
IE
59
9F
Rq
UH
119
kU
UiIV
8m
le.-
Y.,&-
I..
-v
".6
6.616
ciwi6
fd
~zd
allI
aII
zall
Girj
B9
E9
RE
19
1Ei
F9
RE~_
II
9.;K
.Sc4
~:cia
c61
.6VI
V
f1vI
IZ-5
§11
8,-
..
zcq
&VR
qR.9
-g
~§
FM
~r
'1i,'
V'2
i2
AR
ii
U;';R
1~
IF2ir
1i
9U
iU
-1E
~zqg-
--
--
--
--
--
agof d
~g:,!;~fd'd
ak"t.
lag
gg
gg
gFv
c%;e-
Ld6
c;'i'i
4
P!3S
85t8
As
§j
HM
v-1
1Af
ck%~
tqq
q.~fLcS
f~zag
a.;g
9rz,
IAr
R2Z1
!M
dd
-i16
1!2
c;m
8'.
HM
11,9121
'.;im
;O
Wt4ci
H~
'.cli
.6.4
~q6
Partnership
Returns,
1992
th,94141412
qI-F
gg
cS
vo
2P
Hpf
Sca
q-t
qR
8i
,.rci
6ci
eiz
ci
k:w8
~!91
1j
a51
§,:&
631~SI,-8
§§§~,t
qct
*=d
d!d
!f.6;;R
.-~
-R
9
:928.S
~2cli
ig
1g
Rag
~,L1%
~t
-S~--
~i
Cli
clcl
CR-q
azCk
6,4
,6Is
'It.1
6.6
Clf0
J.i
iso
ig
Z:
::
:.
:h
:::
;A
x.0
i::g
...
::
jitE
q,,
!I
AiN
!a
;Z~
6:2
58
"6
4Lj
115R
ts-
:lp
Hul
11
11
S9
-28Z
15,6?
~,FIi
-EII
g2
`~I
I~i
EII
A8.
881
SM
zz
Q!
Partnership
Returns,
1992
1
11
fIlit
IU.
a?
ffQ
I-5-91
991
121
1:'i:i
Vi!,R
,'k
MM
UM
,r
00
M1.
HE
RH
IMM
MM
OE
MSf
~,
-i4;'
MM
IMM
119ult
ci.
-R
~9
fie-
kH
RO
WM
IU.,
11401:e
Ci
adg
.!-'m
gal
9a
Qgl.4
313S12-5
aa
clA
MA
8
N
Ila,
YE
Wa
C;
:~
:4
9-.
~.
SMalq
dd
g.:'j
Rag
,''viiIa~
MAMR111UHS
i9..
ci
i:
1j.
~~
;:
::
~!
::
::
;~:
::
W
is
:Li
::
I.I
3J
A111,11L
1111:11hIngINII
zHill
Partnership
Returns,
1992
Im
c6aci
82-5II31
1, r"g,~
112 I-5
MUEFURMWan
:!TI
'qjG
,n
q
6d
cJ0:1
dge~
rdN
cj
la'd
.3
clil~
'W~
.vW
kkgvan
dp
5s
WF
IRm
u;
WX
GR
IUM
NN
OR
Mci
::;
d1:
1
HIN"HolUkk
115~91M
ZH
UU
FE
6a
6.;
c;
§54#4
So:1
--n
RRg
v9
1a
4'
u0CM
1
107
Partnership
Returns,
1992
6
0L
Ru
nR
aYeE
~SIA
UM
tgE
c~o
.4Vq
3R
kk
RZ
35v?
v
ci
Al
uR
I-t7l
A-0",
kI
qci
m-acli
cli.6
'U
R.!e
t2~J
..S
zid
zk~
UM
?a
~-
~.
~c
MC6
Q'.2
4c!
.4-k
IIIMH
UO
ii
I'H
i9
,A
9R
E3
A--
~4
."Oo
9H
.H
.I
21P't
216
cqH
H-
~,6
,~P
a
a2
HIM
,U
M,
4.6
N
C6,6
o;
qG
!-k
R.
..lo
4c4'i
a,
19
D;
c4Sf9
96
1~9
oLD!-oE
20
is
j.Gi
j.5:.2
Ef
i-
cc0i
E*S
:ji-E
iE
ii,.
i3o
j.:
Ei
EE
E25
vI
pZ
Eco
6A
ETA
al
1
,t
&Z
gN
IE
lE
.5v
.f
gfj;
iz
1.)zi
.1E
zz
M4
"g
im
17H
irz
i9
-z
II
.-
Lit
A
Partnership
Returns,
1992
fm
aERR
u4-n
gg40
44
MR
4S9
g-o
VK
t;1.
ci16
t.
siz
~4-
16'N
cli
S2E
6(Z
nci
cJcl
HU
M%
PH
g-.~
mg
ci6
IRIt
ctIq
n
U
ci
aIki
Ia
RX
FR
Ip
a1
g'-R-k~-t
'8~'kqkR
10ptP%
1P
PkF
999tis
M§
gi~Ra
d"
i?
~~:RP
a...
A-1-miQ;a
a9
A9
clg
c'M
"k
R-
6-
F'R
m&
R§
~;cia;
.I
-c;
6,z
-~LIR -LcL
~tItn
t.A
'tcj
:R'k
gg
gu
gN
EE
-11,5
9I
qd6
gg
6:f
da
cli
6~:,d
6~ig
c6q
2!6;~
cL,6tm
g~,
vI
UG
S-A
.
N.cz
'tq
kcLk
vct
nct
c;
aii
-tc4
E-i5
E1
iffl
1
Z-A
109
Partnership
Returns,
1992
10
go
9w
idd-f
ff
'dcite
40fa
1O
:'
R!ow
ifm
--
------------
gg
--
HIM
P.:co
0cy
EI
IED:9
1
cil
j0'5
1A
coR
ig!1119
CS~z
o;cm~w
ej7
co06
MA
Co0
CD
coCY
10cq
PO
SU
MIq
HiM
lE
gNg
SCHi
44
Fi
Ai:4
ii
CL6u
Ez
Partnership
Returns,
1992
ii Bilki iFkAIVJR m
m~&Arz-j
kqkp~
V,j
0
9v
13
:um
mill
wN
MCO
17
kRumimm
Ruk
L-
-~Ct
-icy
C~d
epC~
M ROMUqu
-
Eggqkm&'
'i
x4xka~~
:v~
:!:
RRX1
IN
gk
R~
!CZI
Nw
915A
dd
~;
RM
;cjw
o.
-II
YcD
j§
Mo
mI
q9
S
MR
::39
wum
~a04A
RM
I.
3
M
1I
5P
1
ZE
EI
RIH
;R
i
41MRURM
RNFA
RER
RR
mv::
C;K
wS8
j-ell
c'7
B
.72
mm
IC44.9.
oR
1-9
VK9
~9
lR
a18
Sginci
ci
Al
A
II
IT
0U
aedM
,0
IH
Him
'fill
IMLm
I,
aA
,IS
Q
III
Partnership
Returns,
1-992
412
g_
7S
'C!
r~C~
cl~cl?
Rq
0~1:
C4C
!-cq.c4c~
~p
Tm
Tkq
qc~
mT
Iw
'-t(P
cq'c4(q
CQq
-Cb
VCO
0M
.i
1-:-
99
-7v
9tq
d(6
aqq
taq
qOR
CRaq
a?W
?v
Na
c~L6
(L
cq~..~r-t
w?r4t
c4to
'tq
Lon,I-
tl:cl)
coC~,G~
Id:q
"tcq
N(P
q~
NE
R-k
--
~8
§'~
aclj
oN
a?q~(q
cqr,~
O.c~
c;---
-cm
c?co
c~w;
c;cdci
cj
v3o
cjo
r~q
cocm
cocq
Pq
P~u!
tqr-~
c4(q
cqtq
Lqa?
u~P
rtco
coo
mM
r-cc?
(qul
9(
cr~
V(D
g9
loIt
In1~4
cl,I
cljN
;!~
t,V
Q8
Lnw
Lf)3
MA
cmv
:P
tP
q.
..
..
z:-
co
-o
7c~
NN
Intd
cj
c4
MIq
cc~
qu~
cim
v)o)
qv)
cmv
_,-R24
cocy
No
Rcy
1,'coGo
tncm
-eo
mIQ
219
--:rl
-:"-~.c
ljIt
cj
cm:~..co
cmcj
wP,
Nm
N-m
wN
vr-
wm
mclj
cq-
-77.
mw
o(d
..
..
..
..
..
c~clj
a)M
LnLo
oQ
)Ln
O,c
4Lq
cqcl
'Tcp
PR
.cqq
PP,:(Y!
N(P
Ncq
ulq
Nr:
'd:cq
;w;)112
S11-
a-
wa
c46a
cr
~tq
itq
,tq
clul
a~7
cqrt
Tco
c1l-
Nc~
cy.cjo
IL'~
~2cy
Nqqq
'tpqooqqP-
c4t-:
r-:Iq
q'It
'TN
u~'T~P
cDLo-
05U)
0)in
Q)
CDC-)
C1.1o
toclj
cls'5
..
.-
o6
cdc~
ej
oici7
c?c4
cm.d
cdci
ci
~'mo
vr-
cocq.q
tq:~co
Lq'~r'.cm
..
..
..
..
coM
' tocm
Go(D
cq,oIt
(R":
..
..
..
..
.vo
mco;(a
cocb
Nco
V,(D
(Dco
m.2A
-@~?
--
~y
c~
.P%
cycm,iF
Ir-co
(mM
wv
Sl
fall
,io
c~,\i
c;c6
c~(6
(6~d
A
clj
c%~
de.c
yci
mLn
w1v
ul)cm
cmV
,-cb
gh:
fg1
_;66
4(\i
c~L6
qto
cm"I
Ncl
N(P
U~-::Cq
C!Ul
coc4
0Nw
8$-
w.to
qu
;ci
cTa;
d
VCD
'nr'
W).Lnci
.:.
97
c~-9
TT
c%I
Lo.loR
-:
cqc3i71~
aqrl~
oo
oIn
QLn
mcl)
Gocogl
u-2,
Cy
aco
oo
cow
Low
rlcl
(R-
I.g_~g'Ctg
ge
SjC
D'!
cmcm
inm
cjo
oc,
cb-oC~,;.:.C,_C,-
..,:C4Lq
LQI~~J~CM
Q;
ci
J
Ale
o-
L.LD
oa
J,?(D
cx
9L
o.o
..
ra
r=L
=J.
a)
CME
4mL
c,
si
SL.
'D2
eLo
o,12a
oo
Z'
LaE
Eo
5.jC
vs-
III
Aw
6(D
'SLD
'o
cc_o
Lao
'oc6
v-
I.mcd
w
r
cD
-w
IDE=
(DE
ol
Erh
2a
a&
2ql
2-E
"E2.5
so.,E
32B
'S,'
58a
cc0
0-
oCD
Lcc
LG
LL-A
Ccor-C
~5LD
0.E
L).e,ID
IDc
E'
C8c-E
.2Sc
OT
'DE
ig-
8cm
E-
G2--
S4D
00
ZE
12--,
8.00
0c
4)zCD
SE
00
M~~CO)
3.
So
0ECD
EE
~i
18
4,0E
=.
8
4Z
0Z