Transcript
Page 1: Overview Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering z · 2005. 2. 2. · © John Straube 2005 Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering Dr John F. Straube Dupont

© John Straube 2005

Applied Computer Modeling Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering for Building Engineering

Dr John F. StraubeDr John F. StraubeDupontDupont Young ProfessorYoung Professor

Dept of Civil Engineering & School of ArchitectureDept of Civil Engineering & School of Architecture

University of WaterlooUniversity of WaterlooOntario, CanadaOntario, Canada

[email protected]@uwaterloo.ca519 888 4015519 888 4015

© John Straube 2005

OverviewOverview

Why Modeling?Heat Flow• Therm / Frame• Heat 2D / Heat 3D • Case studies

Heat & Moisture• WUFI-ORNL & Validation• Case studies

Fire Energy and LightingSummary

2 / 87

© John Straube 2005

ActivityActivity

Sun

EnergyEnergy

ResourcesResourcesPollutantsPollutants

The Building The Building EnclosureEnclosure

EnergyEnergyResourcesResources

PollutantsPollutantsWasteWaste

Pollutants, Waste, EnergyPollutants, Waste, Energy

HVAC

Pollutants: Moisture, odour, + +

The Building SystemThe Building System

© John Straube 2005

Modeling for fun and profitModeling for fun and profit

Predict and understand temperature and moisture condition in & on bldg enclosureAvoid design errorsUnderstand problemsAid the design of repairsDevelopment of new systems/productsDevelop understanding of performance (teach)

Page 2: Overview Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering z · 2005. 2. 2. · © John Straube 2005 Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering Dr John F. Straube Dupont

© John Straube 2005

What are What are ““ModelsModels””

By definition, an approximation of realityTypically a model is designed for a particular purpose,• e.g. calculate energy

As simple as• Q= U •∆T → Q(t) = U •∆T(t)

As complex as full building dynamic simulation including occupant behaviour, plant, controls, etc.

55 / 87 © John Straube 2005

What and for Whom?What and for Whom?

What

Who

Hygrothermal Analysis

AssessmentDesign Study

· New· Conversion· Upgrade

· Condition Survey· Forensic· Conversion

R & D· products· codes· fundamentals

Teaching· colleges· university· professional

Who Engineers, Architects, Code officials Trainers, scientists

This presentation deals with design & analysis uses

© John Straube 2005

Structural EngineeringStructural Engineering

Physics:Statics, MODS

Math

Material Properties

Loads

Idealized Model

Design Process

Performance Thresholds

Structural Analysis

7 / 87 © John Straube 2005

““Building ScienceBuilding Science”” EngineeringEngineering

Physics:Material science, Thermodynamics

Mathematics

Material Properties

Design Process

H.A.M. Analysis

Environmental Loads

Idealized Model

Performance Thresholds

Page 3: Overview Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering z · 2005. 2. 2. · © John Straube 2005 Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering Dr John F. Straube Dupont

© John Straube 2005

Action

PerformanceThresholds

Building the Building the ““ModelModel””

MaterialProperties

PhysicsNumerical Methods

Topology

Results

Boundary Conditions

Surface Transfer

Prob

lem

/ N

eed

9 / 87 © John Straube 2005

The ProcessThe Process

10

Need ProblemDefinition Interpret

Physics

NumericsBoundaryConditions

Topology

MaterialProperties

Iterate as necessary

Decision and Action

© John Straube 2005

RequirementsRequirements

Vary with Need, Time available, expertise

Geometry (topology)Boundary Conditions (operating conditions)Material PropertiesPhysicsPerformance Thresholds

© John Straube 2005

What to ModelWhat to ModelHeat• Flow (Energy)• Temperatures

Air• Energy• Contaminant transport

Moisture• Durability, mold

LightFire

12 / 87

Page 4: Overview Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering z · 2005. 2. 2. · © John Straube 2005 Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering Dr John F. Straube Dupont

© John Straube 2005

Heat FlowHeat Flow

Steady-state or Dynamic• steady-state -- for average conditions or for

lightweight construction• Dynamic -- to assess thermal mass, transient

conditions

One- Two- or Three-dimensionalFree Tools• Use Therm or Frame

Both 2-D steady-state

© John Straube 2005

Thermal BridgingThermal Bridging

Why calculate? •Heat Loss calculations• Surface Condensation

–dust marking– mould–windows

• Interstitial Condensation

2-D steady state is easy2-D dynamic acceptable3-D is time consuming

14 / 87

© John Straube 2005

Wall Temperatures and RHWall Temperatures and RH

Temperature Temperature ProfileProfile

tt

Temperature (C)

VapourVapourPressure Pressure

ororAir Air

moisture moisture contentcontent

1010 252520201515

∆∆tt

∆∆tt

RH=100%RH=100%

RH=80%RH=80%

RH=50%RH=50%

Poor insulation = cold surface = high RH

© John Straube 2005

Interior Air at 22 CInterior Air at 22 CSurface temperatures cannot be less than:Surface temperatures cannot be less than:

Interior RH CondensationTemperature

2020 --22 114040 88 11115050 1111 14146060 1414 17178080 1818 2222

Temperature @80%RH

Page 5: Overview Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering z · 2005. 2. 2. · © John Straube 2005 Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering Dr John F. Straube Dupont

© John Straube 2005

TwoTwo--D SteadyD Steady--statestate

Frame (www.enermodal.com)Therm (windows.lbl.gov/software/therm)• Free, downloadable• Can use AutoCad templates• Primary intent -- window energy calculations• Can do much more

17 / 87 © John Straube 2005

Interior Air: 21.5 C

Windows are usually coldest

© John Straube 2005

Example of a wooden window - meshing

© John Straube 2005

Example of a wooden window - contours, etc

Page 6: Overview Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering z · 2005. 2. 2. · © John Straube 2005 Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering Dr John F. Straube Dupont

© John Straube 2005

Example of a wooden window -“Infra-Red scan”

© John Straube 2005

Steel FramingSteel Framing

Metal Building Systems and Steel StudsCan be Thermal Bridges• Consume Energy • cause dust marking• Surface condensation

How much/little insulation is needed?

22 / 87

© John Straube 2005

InfraInfra--Red PhotosRed Photos

14.0

22.0 °C

14

16

18

20

22

14

15

16

17

18

19

20

21

22

From inside a building at 22 C

© John Straube 2005

Mixing ModelsMixing Models

One model or modeling approache.g.Temperature flow, combined with dewpoint“suite of models”• range of complexity/accuracy• range of expertise required

Case Study Major manufacturing plant• High interior humidity for film production

24 / 87

Page 7: Overview Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering z · 2005. 2. 2. · © John Straube 2005 Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering Dr John F. Straube Dupont

© John Straube 2005

Metal Building SystemOut:Cool

In:WarmHumid

© John Straube 2005

Mesh

© John Straube 2005

-10.0 -5.0 0.0 5.0 10.0 15.0 20.0 25.0 30.0 35.0 40.0

Temperature ( °C)

0

500

1000

1500

2000

2500

3000

3500

4000

Vap

our

Pre

ssure

(Pa

)

100% RH75% RH50% RH25% RH

Psych Chart: Air Vapour Content vs Temperature

Saturation

50%

RH

25%RH

75%

RH

100%

RH

100%RH

Temperature

Air

Moi

stur

e C

onte

nt

= va

pour

pres

sure

(Pa,

in H

g),

hum

idity

rat

io (g

/kg,

gra

ins/

pd)

-10 ºC14 º F

0 ºC32 º F

10 ºC50 º F

20 ºC68 º F

30 ºC86 º F

40 ºC104º F © John Straube 2005

SurfaceCondensation

InterstitialCondensation

Page 8: Overview Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering z · 2005. 2. 2. · © John Straube 2005 Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering Dr John F. Straube Dupont

© John Straube 2005

Case StudyCase Study-- Rec. ComplexRec. ComplexMetal building systemCondensation and Dripping?

© John Straube 2005

Add ¾” insulation blockZero riskNow – other building details

© John Straube 2005

TwoTwo--Dimensional DynamicDimensional Dynamic

Thermally Massive Systems• Energy• Surface condensation

Blocon - Heat2 v4.0 (USD320 www.blocon.se)Physibel- Sectra (www.physiblel.be)

© John Straube 2005

Case Study: SubCase Study: Sub--slab insulation slab insulation below Radiant Heatingbelow Radiant Heating

Question: Does the use of radiant floor heating change the normal rules of thumb regarding sub-slab insulation?Approach: Dynamic 2- Heat flow model

2.1 m below grade At grade

Grade

Grade

4 m tocenter

4 m tocenter

Page 9: Overview Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering z · 2005. 2. 2. · © John Straube 2005 Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering Dr John F. Straube Dupont

© John Straube 2005

Case studyCase study

Uses Heat2 range of soil types and conductivity Apply heat in each tubeControl upward flux to be the same in both

33 / 87 © John Straube 2005

Boundary ConditionsBoundary Conditions

High thermal lag allows large time steps to be practicalCreated synthetic but representative “climate” file

© John Straube 2005

Radiant Floor Heat InputRadiant Floor Heat Input

Based radiant tubes heat output on weekly average outdoor temperature to balance conductive/air leakage losses

© John Straube 2005

Material PropertiesMaterial Properties

Soil properties are both poorly known andimportant to the resultsHence – parametric studySoil Description Conductivity Heat Capacity

(W/mK) (MJ/m3 K)

Dry Sandy Loam 0.70 1.50

Moist Clay 1.50 1.65

Wet Sand 2.30 1.80

36 / 87

Page 10: Overview Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering z · 2005. 2. 2. · © John Straube 2005 Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering Dr John F. Straube Dupont

© John Straube 2005

Heat2Mesh

© John Straube 2005

Materials andProperties

© John Straube 2005Uninsulated Slab FebruaryUninsulated Slab February

Heating power kept the same

ResultsResults

© John Straube 2005Insulated Slab FebruaryInsulated Slab February

Note individual pipes

Page 11: Overview Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering z · 2005. 2. 2. · © John Straube 2005 Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering Dr John F. Straube Dupont

© John Straube 2005

Heat loss comparedHeat loss compared

Savings: 28.2 kWh/m2/yr

© John Straube 2005

ThreeThree--Dimensional Heat FlowDimensional Heat Flow

Steady-state: systems with complex shapes• point thermal bridges, ties, connections

Dynamic: thermally massive complex • as above but thermal mass, fires, foundations

Rarely require this detail -- easier to be cleverCommercial Tools• Physibel Voltra (dynamic) Trisco (static)• Blocon Heat3 (both USD520)• Heat 7.2 (ORNL - not really commercial)

42 / 87

© John Straube 2005

TriscoTrisco --3D steady state3D steady state

© John Straube 2005

Voltra FoundationWinter Conditions

Page 12: Overview Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering z · 2005. 2. 2. · © John Straube 2005 Applied Computer Modeling for Building Engineering Dr John F. Straube Dupont

© John Straube 2005

Boundary Conditions and Annual Temp variations

Note Node 1 and Node 2

© John Straube 2005