1
Origins of Intelligence Assessments/Inventories (“Testing”)
Plato: Saw & noted individual differences
Intelligence Test: *Binet (1905 +-) method of assessing
an individual’s mental aptitudes & comparing them to those of others, using numerical scores
Testing Paris school kids to ID those who were low & needed help
2
Mental Age measure of intelligence test performance
devised by Alfred Binet, Paris, late 1800’s Why? to ID slower kids in Paris school system
to help them do better chronological age: actual age mental age: if a child does as well as the
average 8-year-old is said to have an IQ of 100
Stanford-Binet: widely used American revision of Binet’s original intelligence test (1914-15)
revised by Terman at Stanford University Stern designed the intelligence quotient (IQ)
3
Intelligence Quotient (IQ) Originally, ratio of mental age (ma) to
chronological age (ca) multiplied by 100 IQ = ma ÷ ca x 100 (ma/ca x 100)
on contemporary tests, the avg performance for a specific age is assigned a score of 100
Most intellg. tests (including the Stanford-Binet) no longer compute an “IQ” score (reification: p. 422)
What IS Intelligence? ability to learn from experience, solve
problems, & use knowledge to adapt to new situations
Is determined by a social definition & varies from culture to culture, era to era
4
What is Intelligence?
Factor Analysis statistical procedure that identifies clusters
of related items (called factors) on a test ID’s different performance dimensions that
underlie our total score These factors indicate a basic ability level
Eugenics: Terman & others belief that genetics was the predominate factor in IQ
--was a “scientific” sort of racism…no major basis in modern psych…Basically said some races, etc., were genetically better than others.
Who used these ideas?
5
Spearman’s G Factor:
Spearman’s General Intelligence (g factor) Spearman & others said one
single factor (a general factor) underlies specific mental abilities
This factor is measured by every task on an intelligence test
g = general
6
Most commonly administered intelligence assessments:
WISC-IV: most commonly used IQ test for ages 6-16
WAIS -III is for adults. WIPPSI-III is for preschoolers. Others also use the Stanford-Binet,
5th edition, or the Kaufman ABC-II battery for children.
NOTE: Roman numerals reflect the multiple revisions of the tests since their original versions.
7
Are There Multiple Intelligences? Savant Syndrome
condition in which a person otherwise limited in mental ability has an exceptional specific skill… --often (NOT always..) related to autism Computation Drawing (EX below)
Social Intelligence the know-how involved in comprehending social
situations & managing oneself successfully Emotional Intelligence p.426
ability to perceive, express, understand, & regulate emotions
8
Intelligence & Creativity
Creativity: the ability to produce novel and valuable ideas… Those = creative usually have at least
avg. or above avg. g factor Things that make this possible:
Expertise (have knowledge base) imaginative thinking skills (outside the box)
venturesome personality (take chances) intrinsic motivation creative environment
9
Brain Function & Intelligence People who can
perceive the stimulus FLASHED very quickly tend to score somewhat higher on intelligence tests
P. 430: processing speed, perceptual speed & neurological speed are all involved in assessing the final intellig. Score.
BUT…is that valid? Is FASTER actually BETTER?
Idea is that faster can process MORE info
Stimulus Mask
When FLASHED, is Long side on left or right?
10
Assessing (“Testing”!!) Intelligence
Aptitude Test: designed to predict a person’s future performance looks at abilities…what you should be able to
do aptitude is the capacity to learn
Achievement Test test designed to assess what person has
learned Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale (WAIS)
most widely used intelligence test (WWI) 2 subtests 1) verbal 2) performance
(nonverbal)
WAIS-R = revised adult test; WISC-R = revised kids’ test
11
Assessing Intelligence: Weschler added Performance Component in 1939 b/c of problems assessing those w/ some verbal disadvantages
Sample Items from the WAIS
From Thorndike and Hagen, 1977
VERBAL response General Info Similarities Arithmetic ReasoningVocabularyComprehensionDigit Span
PERFORMANCE
Picture Completion Picture ArrangementBlock DesignObject AssemblyDigit-Symbol Substitution
12
WAIS-R EX’s: Visual Analogies…..block design….. pic sequencing…..WAIS-R performance assessment kit
13
Assessing Intelligence
Standardization defining meaningful scores by comparison w/ the
performance of a pre-tested standardization group to create a norm…what is “normal”
Normal Curve symmetrical bell-shaped curve that describes the
distribution of many physical & psych. Attributes PEAK (mid-point) of curve = 50th percentile—
mid-point… ½ higher than that & ½ lower than that…
most scores fall near the avg, & fewer & fewer scores lie near the extremes
Divergent vs. convergent thinking:ADD!
2 kinds of thinking: Convergent: 1 right answer – like IQ on tests (damage to left parietal can hurt this kind)Divergent: More creative.. “outside the box” Damage to the FRONTAL lobe can hurt this type
14
15
Normal Curve: (sometimes aka the bell curve) 3 magic #’s: 68 (15 pts. above or below mid-pt.)
96 (or 95) 2 (inclusive of 99.7%)So..what’s mentally challenged & “genius” ? (Psy’s HATE “genius”)
16
Kids getting smarter?! Who’d a thunk it… Flynn effect: Consistent worldwide rise in IQ scores, even though achievement scores like SAT dropped …WHY?
17
Why Flynn Effect (James Flynn, 1987, 1999) occurs… It’s a mystery…but could be lots of things…
Test sophistication: assessments are better now…more accurately assess
Nutrition: taller, smarter, longer life expectancies
More formal educations for more pplMore stimulating environment b/c of t___?Less kid-diseases that might cause handicapsSmaller families = more parental resources
(time, money, effort) on each kid-------------So....Why are SAT scores down? Probably b/c
more ppl and more diverse ppl taking SAT now instead of just the middle & upper middle class.
18
Assessments of Intelligence (aka Testing) Reliability & Validity Reliability: extent to which a test yields
consistent results assessed by consistency of scores in 3 ways:
two halves of the test alternate forms of the test retesting
Validity: How well a test measures or predicts what it is supposed to
EX: Does SAT predict success in the 1st year of college? 3 aspects to validity…
Content validity Predictive validity Criterion validity
19
Assessing Intelligence: 3 major considerations:
1. Content Validity: extent to which a test samples a behavior that is of interest
EX: Driving test that samples driving tasks… DOES it evaluate the content you want to look at? 2. Criterion validity
the measure (part of the operational definition) used in defining whether the test does have predictive validity (next slide )
Some behavior that a test is designed to predict EX: Are college grades being predicted by SAT
performance? …or... In driving, do 3 pt. turns, parking, handling the car in
tight spaces, etc., represent things you will need to do while driving?
Criterion is what they are shooting for, trying to do
20
3. Predictive Validity (aka criterion-related validity)
How good a test is at predicting compute the correlation between test scores
& the “target” behavior (behavior you’re interested in)
Can give good predictions RE: the behavior looked at… or not?
EX: DOES the SAT predict success in college? Generally, yes.
BUT…GRE (graduate record exam)…not as much b/c all are higher performing…
21
Assessing Intelligence: (436) Relating body wt. & success to predict…The larger the sample the better it can predict
As the range of data under consideration narrows (goes from larger to smaller range), its predictive power diminishes
BTW: What is this type of graph called?
Greater correlationover broad range
of body wts. (Lg. #)
10
9
8
7
6
5
4
3
2
1
0
Little correlation
w/inrestricted
range (sm. #)
Football linemen’s
success
Body weight in pounds180 250 290
22
The Dynamics of Intelligence: The Low extreme of Intelligence:
Mentally Challenged
(previously called “mental retardation” or mentally handicapped but M-C is the preferred reference) a condition of limited
mental ability indicated by an
intelligence score at or below 70
produces difficulty in adapting to the demands of life
varies from mild to profound
Down Syndrome A type of
retardation & associated physical disorders caused by an extra chromosome in one’s genetic makeup…
Usually related to mom’s age (older moms)…
(extra #21 chromosome for a total of 47 chromosomes)
23
24
The Dynamics of Intelligence: Know chart! (p. 439) Supreme Court Hearing on executing mentally challenged:http://www.newsy.com/videos/supreme-court-hears-debate-on-executing-mentally-disabled/
25
Heritability: proportion of variation among individuals that we can attribute to genesVariability depends on range of populations & environments studied
Intelligence heritability = about 50%
The most genetically similar people have the most similar scores
26
Genetic Influences: psychologists look at both twin studies & biological parents vs. adoptive parents
27
Environmental Influences: The Schooling Effect: IQ’s tend to rise during the school year…& drop
during summer…& drop after schooling stops…So…a good argument for year-round school?...Asian students vs. N. American students?
28
What’s wrong with this picture???
29
Group differences & impact of environment: The Seed Analogy:
Same seeds (genetics) …but different soil…levels of fertilizer…water….sun
these = so a differing environ. Would they grow the same?
HEAD START: Data from research on Head Start programs (public “pre-school” to helped kids from lo-socio-econ. environments) show H-S kids are less likely to repeat grades than those in similar environments NOT in Head Start
Variation within group
Variation within group
Difference within group
Poor soil Fertile soil
Seeds
30
Group Differences: GenderKNOW the general male & female tendencies toward certain abilities… (from info p.448-9) Do these stronger abilities apply to ALL males or females? The Mental Rotation Test : spatial understanding
Which of the other circles contain a configuration of blocks identical to the “standard” fig. (left)?
Standard Responses
31
Group Differences Stereotype Threat
Self-confirming concern/belief: negative stereotypes give us “true” evaluation
Relates to “self-fulfilling prophecy” & placebo effect: believing something IS true increase chance it happens:
“I will probably score low” = scoring lowerStudents told they are at a disadvantage on a
test tend to do worse than those who are told the test should be one they do well on…
“You are not likely to do as well on this as usual…”
…OR “You should do very well on this b/c it is written in a way that will show your strengths…”
Also African-Amer. or females taking test w/ only that group perform better than in mixed groups
Summary: What you think & believe about YOU
affects how you perform!
32
High vs. low extremes of intelligence:
Myth: High IQ kids are mal-adjusted, weird, socially inept….this is NOT TRUE
-There is a high correlation for high IQ & healthy, well-adjusted, academically successful adults…
Most thrive, though some are isolated more as kids b/c they don’t fit in w/ immature other kids
Remember: “giftedness” is a socially defined trait & not a “naturally occurring trait” like eye color (what is this called?)
Brain size (relative to body size) IS slightly positively correlated to intelligence
33
Big debate: tracking: This is “gifted” kids separated into
other classes/schools (segregating by ability level):
Often this means low income & minority put into low levels, which encourages the stereotype threat…which...
Tends to widen, not shrink, the gap betwn. lo & hi especially in elementary school
Best idea may be, like China & Japan: Avoid tracking thru elementary
Pitfalls in Diagnostic Labeling of High OR Low Intelligence:
To what do you think the term “diagnostic labeling” refers?
If we determine someone is of HIGH IQ…Or…LO IQ, what might make that a problem? How might the following be involved in that consideration?
Motivation? (either hi or lo?) Stereotype threat? Flynn Effect? Reification?
*****GO BACK to slide # 29 to H-S notes!!!s34
35
Theories of Multiple Intelligences (pp. 424-426) Is there 1 kind? …or 2? …or 3? ..or 8? Remember: Spearman: 1 basic general intel. (g
factor)
Sternberg’s Big 3:Analytical intelligence: academic problem solving—
there’s 1 right answer
Creative intelligence: react to novel situations
& use novel ideas
Practical intelligence: deal w/ everyday
problems & come up w/ multiple solutions
Howard Gardner: Theory of 8 Multiple
Intelligences Verbal Movement
(kinesthetic) Math Understanding
ourselves (our emotions/feelings)
Music Understanding others
(emotion—reading others) Spatial analysis/visual
(art) Understanding our
physical environment (naturalistic world)
36
37
Some review ?’s
How does head size correlate with intelligence? (p. 429)
Can you assess an infant’s possible intelligence?
38
PPL to know RE: Intelligence & intelligence assessments:
BinetFlynnGardnerSpearmanSternSternbergTermanWechsler
39
“Hey, I don’t have time to exercise!!”
ANSWERS to PRACTICE Test from class…
1.A2.D3.D4.A5.D6.C7.D8.B9.E10.D11.C12.C13.B14.D15.D16.D17.E
40
18.C19.D20.E21.D22.B23.D24.C25.C26.C27.D28.D29.B30.D31.D32.E33.B34.C