Running head: ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 1
Online Counseling: A Primer for Practitioners
Stephanie K. Ferguson, PhD
New Mexico Junior College
Author Contact Information:1 Thunderbird Circle, Hobbs, New Mexico [email protected] (mobile)575-492-2643 (office)
ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 2
AbstractThe number of people with reliable access to the Internet has grown exponentially in recent
years. With the advent of such connectivity, mental health counseling has expanded into the
virtual realm by using online counseling as a means to facilitate the therapeutic relationship.
Those in the field who are considering establishing or expanding their practice with the Internet
have an obligation to fully explore and understand both the ethical and legal ramifications of
doing so as well as the empirical research examining the efficacy and essential skills required of
such practices.
ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 3
Online Counseling: A Primer for Practitioners
At present, approximately 40% (3.4 billion) of the word population has Internet
connectivity (Internet Live Stats, 2016). According to Internet Live Stats (2016), 8.4% of the
world’s Internet users reside in the United States, which equates to 88.5% (approximately 287
million people) of the United States’ population having reliable access to the Internet. Thus, “a
majority of lives are now touched, if not transformed, by having potential access to anyone else
in the world with a computer (or smartphone) and an Internet connection” (Fenichel, 2010, p. 6).
With an exponential increase in connectivity, many people utilize the Internet as a primary mode
of communication with friends, family, colleagues, and services (Barnard, 2010). The ease with
which many interact with and through the Internet using computers and smart devices makes
utilizing the worldwide web to garner information more commonplace than using a printed
telephone directory or brick-and-mortar library stacks. As a mental health practitioner, it is
essential to understand not only the ethical and legal implications of leveraging the Internet as a
vehicle for therapeutic services (Mallen, Vogel, & Rochlen, 2005) but also the inherent
advantages and disadvantages of the medium as well as required essential skills and documented
best practices.
What is Online Counseling?
As defined by the American Telemedicine Association (ATA) (2012), “telemedicine is
the use of medical information exchanged from one site to another via electronic
communications to improve a patient’s clinical health status” (para. 1). With the advent of the
personal computer revolution in the 1970’s and 1980’s, telemedicine practiced at a distance
appeared in a substantive way with hospitals providing care from a distance to those in rural
areas (Sosa-Iudicissa, Wootton, & Ferrer-Roca, 1999). Telemedicine encompasses the use of
ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 4
telecommunication technologies to provide services to patients such as two-way video, email,
smart phone applications, and wireless tools.
Online counseling is one component of telemedicine and is a relatively new modality in
the arena of mental health care (Kraus & Stickler, 2011). Online counseling, sometimes
referenced in the literature as e-therapy, telepsychiatry, telecounseling, and/or telemental health,
refers to all clinical interactions and services done via various Internet-assisted modalities such
as text, email, chat, video or voice links, forums or message boards, and web logs (Kraus &
Stickler, 2011; Barnard, 2010). These modalities can be divided into two groups of online
interactions – synchronous and asynchronous.
Synchronous online interaction includes those modalities where two of more people are
able to communicate at the same time with no appreciable delay in response. Synchronous
modalities could include text, chat, and/or video or voice links (e.g., Skype, Facetime, WebEx,
Tango, etc.). Conversely, asynchronous interactions have delayed responses times due to
participants accessing the Internet at different times. Asynchronous modes of communication
include email, forums or message boards, and/or web logs (blogs). Whichever mode of online
communication is used in the therapeutic process – synchronous or asynchronous – it is
imperative that the practitioner understand the ethical and legal implications related to online
counseling.
Ethical Guidelines
Ethical guidelines have been in place for quite some time to govern the provision of
mental health services in person (Hsiung, 2002). However, with almost 90% of the population of
the United States having dependable access to the Internet and the demand for health care
ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 5
services on the rise, the need for ethical guidelines specific to online therapeutic service delivery
is imperative (Mallen, Vogel, & Rochlen, 2005).
In 2014, the American Counseling Association (ACA) adopted a revised and updated
Code of Ethics, which includes a specific section related to distance counseling, technology, and
social media. These guidelines acknowledge that “counseling may no longer be limited to in-
person, face-to-face interactions” (ACA, Section H, 2014, p. 17). Specific components of this
section include knowledge and legal considerations; informed consent and security; client
verification; distance counseling relationship; records and web maintenance; and social media.
The guidelines established by the ACA (2014) build upon the Suggested Principles of
Professional Ethics for the Online Provision of Mental Health Services developed by the
International Society for Mental Health Online (ISMHO, 2000). While many of the same
components exist in the ISMHO guidelines document, some notable differences are present. The
ISMHO (2000) under the heading of informed consent highlighted the need to expressly indicate
expectations for “turnaround time” in asynchronous online communication (Section A.1.b).
Another notable difference under informed consent is the mention of the “privacy of the
therapist” as well as the client: “The therapist has a tight to his or her privacy and may wish to
restrict the use of any copies or recording the patient makes of their communications” (Section
A.1.c). The mention of emergencies and what procedures as well as local backup for potential
emergencies is detailed also (Section C.1).
Traditional principles of professional ethics should be extended to online counseling
(Hsiung, 2000), but such traditional principles need to be modified in order to address the unique
opportunities and challenges that online therapeutic relationships pose. While the ethical
guidelines of both the ACA and the ISMHO provide parameters for online therapeutic
ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 6
interaction, they lack the delineation of distinct processes by which practitioners could
incorporate them into their online mental health services. Just as the landscape of online
communication changes at an exponential rate, the ethical principles related to online counseling
must be re-evaluated on a regular basis in order to insure “the basic values of professional ethics
beneficence, nonmaleficence, and autonomy” are maintained in the field (Hsiung, 2000, p. 151).
Legal Implications
While many professional organizations have established guidelines for online counseling,
guidelines are not the same as law, however. According to Zack (2010, p. 108), “Online mental
health counseling shares many of the same features as traditional counseling approaches and
courts will look to the traditional setting for parallel standards of professional and ethical
practice.” In the absence of case law, the court system tends to “interpret existing statutes and
precedents from other contexts” and extrapolate rulings applicable to the heretofore uncharted
territory (Zack, 2010, p. 108).
Regulatory Issues
The regulation of virtual interaction is a fiercely debated topic attempting to balance free
enterprise and personal liberties (e.g., free speech) with general welfare and security. There are
federal laws, state laws, and regulations to which face-to-face and online counselors alike must
adhere. These include, but are not limited to, licensure and professional legal duties.
Licensure. “State practice laws generally require that anyone providing mental health
services to residents of that state be licensed” within that state (Zack, 2010, p. 114). This was
rarely an issue when considering face-to-face therapeutic relationships; however, with the advent
of online counseling, such lack of reciprocity between states in effect requires the counselor to be
licensed in both the state where he or she resides as well as where the client lives since both
ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 7
states “have an interest in controlling what happens in an online counseling interaction” to insure
practitioners are qualified and to protect their citizens (Zack, 2010, p. 116). There are those in the
field hold the opinion that within an online therapeutic relationship, the counseling takes place
within the state where the practitioner resides (Derrig-Palumbo & Zeine, 2005; Hsiung, 2002).
Derrig-Palumbo and Zeine (2005) suggested that until more finite parameters are established,
practitioners should “proceed and defend, as necessary, that therapy takes place where the
therapist practices and is licensed and/or only see clients in the state in which [they] are licensed”
(p. 201). The federal government has expressed an interest in addressing the issue of licensure
portability in an attempt to promote telehealth services, which include online counseling.
However, Reinhardt (2013a) cautioned, “Before offering telehealth services, be sure to consult
the licensure laws in [the applicable states] and an attorney” (para. 7).
Professional Legal Duties. Every professional mental health organization or association
has its own set of ethics that practitioners are expected to follow (Corey, Corey, & Callanan,
2011). While codes of ethics vary in their semantics and specifics, Koocher and Ketih-Spiegel
(2008) noted a number of similar themes across professional organizations including
competence, confidentiality, and consent. Zack (2010) identified those same themes as being
pertinent to online counseling as well.
Competence. “Just as in face-to-face therapy, an online mental health professional will be
liable for negligence if (1) a professional/patient relationship exists; (2) the professional breached
a legal duty imposed by the virtue of that relationship; (3) the breach of duty caused injury to the
client; and (4) the client suffered damages as a result [57A Am. Jur. 2d Negligence § 71]” (Zack,
2010, p. 117). Providing counseling face-to-face is not the same as establishing a therapeutic
relationship online (Zack, 2010; Anthony & Nagel, 2010; Haberstroh, 2009; Barnard, 2010). A
ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 8
way to address the change in modality and the requisite skills needed to be a competent
counselor online is to seek additional training and/or certification so practitioners can insure they
are within both legal and ethical parameters (Reinhardt, 2013; Zack, 2010; Anthony & Nagel,
2010).
Confidentiality. “Confidentiality refers to the legal rules and guidelines that obligate a
therapist not to reveal information about a client” (Derring-Palumbo & Zeine, 2005, p. 203).
Most states require mental health professionals to protect their clients’ confidential information
as part of their legal duty (Zack, 2010). In an online therapeutic relationship, the same rules of
confidentiality apply, but the medium to which they apply – the online environment – affects
how confidential information is handled. Could a chat session between a therapist and client be
accessed by a third party? Might an email interaction between a counselor and client be
forwarded to another person? Could a text message be read by someone who found a lost smart
phone? Could a therapists computerized files be hacked? Such possibilities are not necessarily
unique to online therapy, but mental health practice in a virtual environment must consider
security of patients’ information within the context of cyber threats.
Consent. It is incumbent upon mental health practitioners to disclose to a prospective
client the potential risks and benefits of treatment (ACA, 2014, Section A.2). The same standard
is applied to online counseling. “Online counselors need to inform their clients of the additional
risks due to the online medium that might impact their decision concerning whether or not to
engage in online counseling versus face-to-face counseling” (Berger, 2003; Dreezen, 2004 as
cited in Zack, 2010, p. 119). Some of those additional risks may include the potential of
confidential information being disclosed due to a security breach; the inadvertent outage of
service due to technical issues with Internet service providers; the possible misunderstanding that
ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 9
may occur due to inherent limitations of text-based communication; and/or the difficulty of
intervention form a distance in the case of an emergency (Zack, 2010). Such informed consent
procedures should be a part of the intake process and should be acknowledged by the client in
order to insure client understanding of the potential risks involved with online treatment.
Privacy and security. Under federal regulations associated with the Health Insurance
Portability and Accountability Act (HIPPA), fines may be levied against anyone who knowingly
discloses personally identifiable health information to another person. Since most counselors,
including those who practice online, use electronic billing or third-party programs/software to
provide services (e.g., email service, chat platform, e-clinic websites), as a “covered entity”
HIPPA regulations as well as specifications in the Health Information Technology for Economic
and Clinical Health Act (HITECH), which requires a business associate agreement with the
vendor of the technology used to process payments or render services, apply (Zack, 2010;
Reinhardt, 2013a). Essentially, if a tool is used to create, receive, maintain, or transmit Protected
Health Information (PHI), then the vendor of that tool is a business associate and they can be
held responsible for following HIPPA law (Reinhardt, 2013b). The use of encryption offers one
workable solution where therapeutic communication and payment transactions are secured with
encryption keys to which third-party vendors do not have access.
Efficacy of Online Counseling
Barak, Hen, Boniel-Nissim, and Shapira (2008), after completing a meta-analysis of 92
studies involving a total of 9764 clients, indicated empirical research exists supporting the
efficacy of online counseling. Barak (2015) later compiled a bibliography of peer-reviewed
literature regarding Internet-assisted therapy and counseling containing over 500 articles. “The
general conclusion drawn from many studies and several meta-analyses is that online counseling
ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 10
can be as effective as face-to-face sessions” (Kraus, 2010, p. 56). Online counseling was deemed
particularly effective in the treatment of depression (Christensen, Griffiths, & Jorm, 2004),
anxiety (Kenardy, McCafferty, & Rosa, 2003), and eating disorders (Zabinski, Celio, Wilfley, &
Taylor, 2003). Birgit, Horn, and Andreas (2013) found that clients participating in online therapy
reread the correspondence from their therapist and used it as a catalyst in their personal
therapeutic progress. Similarly, “counselors in training reported facilitating online counseling
was easier because they were able to peruse their session transcripts” allowing them to delineate
themes that may have been missed in face-to-face settings (Haberstroh, 2009, p. 2). It is clear
from the increasing number of studies published that there is sufficient empirical evidence to
support the efficacy of online counseling.
Advantages and Disadvantages of Online Counseling
However, it is important to remember, however, that with every form of treatment there
are advantages and disadvantages. Understanding both will help practitioners decide whether or
not providing mental health services online is appropriate for themselves and their clients.
Advantages
Convenience is one of the primary advantages of online counseling. Since the therapeutic
relationship is built via the Internet, clients do not need to leave the comfort of their own home in
order to benefit from mental health services. This saves on both time and the expense of travel
for the client as well as possible child care costs. Another aspect of convenience is accessibility
for those with limited mobility – physical disabilities, physical illness, or mental issues that
prevent people from leaving their homes become a nonissue with online counseling. Providing
mental health services online also benefits those who live in remote areas without access to such
services.
ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 11
Anonymity and perceived privacy are additional advantages. Since the therapy is
experienced within the client’s own space, no one needs to know that the client is actually
“seeing” a therapist (Barnard, 2010). Similarly, some people still sense a stigma affiliated with
seeking mental health services. “Others may be phobic, trapped in abusive situations, or merely
shy and afraid to face someone” (Speyer & Zack, 2010, para. 8). Since the counselor is not
physically present, the client’s feelings of fear or shame dissipate with online counseling.
Online counseling can be an educational tool. Since virtual interaction tends to have a
disinhibiting effect, clients are more quickly able to identify core issues (Speyer & Zack, 2010;
Barnard, 2010). The power differential (Owen, 1995) that often exists within therapeutic
relationships is diminished allowing the client to take ownership of the therapeutic process more
readily (Speyer & Zack, 2010). When using text-based online counseling, the client is able to
read and write their messages at any time. Along with enabling clients to rehearse and compose
well-composed responses, they are able to revisit those text-based interactions repeatedly to
“reinforce the solutions and resolutions” identified within them (Speyer & Zack, 2010, para. 15;
Barnard, 2010).
Disadvantages
Beyond the question of licensure and location of services previously discussed, some
insurance companies may not cover online therapy. Without insurance coverage, extended online
therapy may be cost prohibitive for some clients. As noted earlier, confidentiality is just as
important in online therapeutic relationships as it is face-to-face. Beyond the concerns related to
third-party vendors and hacking vulnerability, with online counseling it is incumbent upon “the
client to protect their privacy and limit disruptions” during a session as well (Barnard, 2010,
para. 72).
ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 12
While asynchronous communication allows for reflection, it may also increase the
likelihood of misunderstandings. Nonverbal signals are not present in text-based online
counseling and may be limited when using a webcam. In the absence of such visual cues,
practitioners may need to “read between the lines” in order to ascertain the actual crux of the
issue at hand (Speyer & Zack, 2010; Barnard, 2010).
Ease of access can be a proverbial double-edged sword. Just because a client has access
to online counseling services does not mean that the client is an appropriate candidate for such
services. It is important to consider - Who can be effectively treated online and how is such a
potential client identified? Internet intake procedures should be structured to promote assessment
and screen out clients who would be better served in face-to-face settings (Speyer & Zack, 2010;
Barnard, 2010).
Essential Skills and Suggested Practices
According to Fenichel (2010), “the clinician who works entirely online needs a new skill
set that includes privacy safeguards for the client, methods of clear communication
(compensating for absent verbal and visual cues), a framework that is structured yet flexible, and
processes that allow for means of validating the results” (p. 7). Speyer and Zack (2010)
highlighted the need for practitioners to understand the limitations of the online medium while
leveraging the benefits. At a minimum, practitioners should:
assess the suitability of clients via an intake process;
work within ethical parameters;
educate clients and provide informed consent;
advise clients of limitations related to online counseling;
have resources in place to address potential emergencies; and
ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 13
provide verification of professional qualifications (Speyer & Zack, 2010).
It is also essential for both the practitioner and the client to be confident and competent in
their computer usage skills (Anthony & Nagel, 2010; Speyer & Zack, 2010). Having knowledge
of specific computer programs, platforms, firewalls, and other security needs to insure privacy
concerns are being addressed. Likewise, both the practitioner and the client should be reasonably
proficient in writing and typing. Text-based counseling “is essentially a letter writing process”
(Speyer & Zack, 2010, p. 3) simply using an electronic medium rather than pen and paper.
Reinhardt (2013a) as well as Anthony and Nagel (2010) and Haberstroh (2009) agreed working
online is a specialty area that requires additional skills unique to the virtual therapeutic
relationship. “Training, knowledge, and supervision regarding mental health and technology is
paramount to delivering a standard or care that is considered ‘best practice’” and may be gained
through both formal and informal training, books, peer-reviewed literature, popular media, and
clinical/peer supervision (Anthony & Nagel, 2010, p. 67).
Closing Thoughts
The methods and scope of online counseling as well as the ethics and regulations
governing it are still evolving. At its best, online counseling enables both practitioner and clients
to experience telepresence – “the illusion that a mediated experience is not mediated” (Lombard
& Ditton, 2006, para. 1). When such conditions exist, practitioner and client are able to engage in
a satisfying and productive virtual therapeutic relationship. Understanding both the rewards and
the risks of such an undertaking, however, is essential for all participants. Approaching the
potential benefits with enthusiasm tempered with caution in relation to the challenges of the
medium will serve practitioners well.
ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 14
References
American Counseling Association. (2014). Code of ethics. Alexandria, VA: Author.
American Telemedicine Association. (2012). What is telemedicine? Retrieved from
http://www.americantelemed.org/about-telemedicine/what-is-telemedicine#.V46BivkrJpg
Anthony, K., & Nagel, D. (2010). Therapy online: A practical guide. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Barak, A. (2015, August 6). Internet-assisted therapy and counseling. Retrieved from
http://azy.edu.haifa.ac.il/references/internet-assisted-therapy-counseling
Barak, A., Hen, L., Boniel-Nissim, M., & Shapira, N. (2008). A comprehensive review and
meta-analysis of the effectiveness of Internet-based psychotherapeutic interventions.
Journal of Technology in Human Services, 26, 109-160.
Barnard, J. (2010). Online counselling: A guide for therapists [Kindle e-book]. St. Agnes,
Australia: MTC Books.
Birgit, W., Horn, A., & Andreas, M. (2013). Internet-based versus face-to-face cognitive-
behavioral intervention for depression: A randomized controlled non-inferiority trial.
Journal of Affective Disorders, 152-154, 113-121. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2013.06.032
Christensen, H., Griffiths, K., & Jorm, A. (2004). Delivering interventions for depression by
using the Internet: randomized controlled trial. British Medical Journal, 328, 265-269.
Corey, G., Corey, M, & Callanan, P. (2011). Issues and ethics in the helping professions (8th ed.).
Belmont, CA: Brooks/Cole-Cengage.
Fenichel, M. (2010). Online behavior, communication, and experience. In R. Kraus, G. Strickler,
& C. Speyer (Eds.), Online counseling: A handbook for mental health professionals, (pp.
3-20). Boston, MA: Elsevier – Academic Press.
ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 15
Haberstroh, S. (2009). Strategies and resources for conducting online counseling. Journal of
Professional Counseling: Practice, Theory, and Research, 37(2), 1-20.
Hsiung, R. (Ed.). (2002). E-Therapy: Case studies, guiding principles, and the clinical potential
of the Internet. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Co.
International Society for Mental Health Online. (2000). Suggested principles for the online
provision of mental health services (version 3.11). Retrieved from
http://ismho.org/resources/archive/suggested-principles-for-the-online-provision-of-
mental-health-services/
Internet Live Stats. (2016, July 19). Internet users. Retrieved from
http://www.internetlivestats.com/internet-users/
Kenardy, J., McCafferty, K., &Rosa, V. (2003). Internet-delivered indicated prevention for
anxiety disorders: A randomized controlled trial. Behavioral and Cognitive
Psychotherapy, 31, 279-289.
Koocher, G., & Keith-Spiegel, P. (2008). Ethics in psychology and the mental health
professions: Standards and cases (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
Kraus, R. (2010). Online counseling: Does it work? Research findings to date. Introduction. In R.
Kraus, G. Strickler, & C. Speyer (Eds.), Online counseling: A handbook for mental
health professionals, (pp. 55-63). Boston, MA: Elsevier – Academic Press.
Kraus, R., & Strickler, G. (2010). Introduction. In R. Kraus, G. Strickler, & C. Speyer (Eds.),
Online counseling: A handbook for mental health professionals, (pp. xvii-xx). Boston,
MA: Elsevier – Academic Press.
Lombard, M., & Ditton, T. (2006). The heart of it all: The concept of presence. Journal of
Computer-Mediated Communication [Online], 3(2). Retrieved from
ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 16
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1083-6101.1997.tb00072.x/full
Mallen, M., Vogel, D., & Rochlen, A. (2005). The practical aspects of online counseling: Ethics,
training, technology, and competency. The Counseling Psychologist, 33(6), 776-818.
Owen, I. (1995). Power, boundaries, intersubjectivity. British Journal of medical Psychology,
68(2), 97-107.
Reinhardt, R. (2013a, October 28). Providing telehealth services: Opportunities and cautions.
Tame your practice [Web log]. Retrieved from
https://tameyourpractice.com/blog/providing-telehealth-services-opportunities-and-
cautions
Reinhardt, R. (2013b, February 20). HIPAA final rule and the conduit exception. Tame your
practice [Web log]. Retrieved from https://tameyourpractice.com/blog/hipaa-final-rule-
and-conduit-exception
Sosa-Iudicissa, M., Wootton, R., & Ferrer-Roca, O. (1999). History of telemedicine. In O. Ferrer-
Roca, & M. Sosa-Iudicissa (Eds.), Handbook of telemedicine (pp. 1-18). Amsterdam,
Netherlands: IOS Press.
Speyer, C., & Zack, J. (2010). Online counselling: Beyond the pros and cons. The Employee
Assistance Trade Association. Retrieved from https://www.easna.org/conferences/2010-
institute-presentations/
Zabinski, M, Celio, A., Wilfley, D., & Taylor, C. (2003). Prevention of eating disorders and
obesity via the Internet. Cognitive Behavior Therapy, 32, 137-150.
Zack, J. (2010). Legal issues for online counselors. In R. Kraus, G. Strickler, & C. Speyer (Eds.),
Online counseling: A handbook for mental health professionals, (pp. 107-127). Boston,
MA: Elsevier – Academic Press.
ONLINE COUNSELING: A PRIMER FOR PRACTITIONERS 17