NYSFAAA Leadership Preparation
Program Reviews October 16, 2015Thomas J. Dalton
Assistant Vice-President, Enrollment Management
Excelsior College
What is a Federal Program Review?
Method of oversight Evaluates compliance with Title IV, HEA statute
and regulations Examination of financial aid, fiscal and academic
records Interviews with institutional staff and students Review of consumer information requirements
Identifies errors in compliance and liabilities owed
Tool to improve future institutional capabilities
How Are Institutions Selected?
20 U.S.C. 1099c -1 (a)(2): (The Secretary) shall give priority for program review to institutions of higher education that are institutions with:
High cohort default rate or dollar volume of default (25%+) Significant fluctuations in Federal Pell Grant or loan volume Reported deficiencies or financial aid problems by state or
accrediting agency High annual dropout rates, or Any other institution the Department determines may pose
significant risk of failure to comply with administrative capability or financial responsibility requirements
Institution Preparation for Program Review
Receiving Notification of Program Review
Advance Notice Review
Short Notice Review
Third-Party Servicer Notification
Responding to Announcement Letter
4
Excelsior's Federal Program Review Timeline
February 10, 2015 – Notification from DoE Required Deadlines:
February 17, 2015 – Consumer Information and Disclosures
February 18, 2015 – Data Requests February 23, 2015 – Outstanding Items March 2, 2015 – Records and Documentation
available for Review
6
Entrance Meeting
Introductions DoE will explain the process Issue the sample to be reviewed
15 – 20 students in FY 2014 15 – 20 students in FY 2015
Review will look at ALL areas of the College – will last 5 days
7
Areas of Focus During the Review Specific to Excelsior College
The regular and substantive interactions between faculty and students
Dropout rate Return of Title IV Student Authentication @ time of
Enrollment The Flow of Money
Review of Institutional Processes and Data
Review Institutional Documents Collected• Catalog/Brochure/Handbook• Policies and Procedures• Published Campus Security Information• Student Consumer Publications• Online Student Consumer Information• Institutional Forms, Applications and
Worksheets
8
Review of Institutional Processes and Data
Review of Institutional Critical Elements• Eligible Institution• Administrative Capability• Program Eligibility• Consumer Information• Campus Security• Financial Responsibility• Fiscal Review• FISAP
9
Review of Institutional Processes and Data
Staff Interviews• Academic/Registrar• Admissions• Financial Aid• Student Accounts/Bursar/Fiscal Office• Placement• Campus Security
10
Review of Student Level Information
Review of Student Critical Elements• Student Eligibility• Attendance• Cost of Attendance• Credit Balances• Enrollment Status• Dependency Overrides/Professional Judgment• Return of Title IV• Satisfactory Academic Progress• Verification• Calculations/Disbursements
11
Review of Student Level Information
Records Reviewed in Student Files Admissions Academic Financial Aid Student Account Ledger
Student Records Compared to Department Data NSLDS COD CPS
Student and Staff Interviews
13
Exit Meeting
Same representation as Entrance Meeting DoE will present any “Findings” Typically they won’t tell you what you do
well! DoE will identify any outstanding items DoE will describe the process for appeal DoE may request additional information
14
What happens after the onsite visit?
DoE will issue a “Final Determination Letter” in 3 to 6 months
Your institution will have 30 days to appeal any finding
If your institution agrees with the findings – you will have 30 days to submit a “Corrective Action Plan” and repay Federal funds back if they are due
Final Program Review DeterminationLetter (FPRD)
Department’s final determination for each finding Identifies liabilities and provides payment
instructions Closes Program Review, if appropriate State authorizing and accrediting agencies
receive copies Subject to FOIA Two types:
No further action required Further action required
15
Final Program Review Determination Letter (FPRD)
Standard sections• Cover page• Table of Contents• Institutional Information• Scope of Review and Disclaimer• Findings and Final Determinations• Summary of Liabilities• Repayment Instructions• Appendices and Enclosures
• Sample template in Program Review Guide
Top Audit Findings
1. Repeat Finding – Failure to Take Corrective Action
2. NSLDS Roster Reporting – Inaccurate/Untimely Reporting
3. Return of Title IV (R2T4) Calculation Errors
4. R2T4 Made Late
5. Verification Violations
17
Top Audit Findings
6. Pell Overpayment/Underpayment
7. Student Credit Balance Deficiencies
8. Entrance/Exit Counseling Deficiencies
9. Qualified Auditor’s Opinion Cited in Audit
10.G5 Expenditures Untimely/Incorrectly Reported
18
Top Program Review Findings
1. Verification Violations
2. Return of Title IV (R2T4) Calculation Errors
3. Student Credit Balance Deficiencies
4. Entrance/Exit Counseling Deficiencies
5. Crime Awareness Requirements Not Met
6. Satisfactory Academic Progress Policy Not Adequately Developed/Monitored
Top Program Review Findings
7. NSLDS Roster Reporting – Inaccurate/Untimely Reporting
8. Inaccurate Record Keeping
9. Drug Abuse Prevention Program
10.Requirements Not Met
11.Consumer Information Requirements Not Met
12.Return of Title IV (R2T4) Made Late
Findings on Both Lists
1. R2T4 Calculation Errors
2. Student Status – Inaccurate/Untimely Reporting
3. R2T4 Made Late
4. Verification Violations
5. Student Credit Balance Deficiencies
6. Entrance/Exit Counseling Deficiencies
21
Resources on IFAP
http://ifap.ed.gov/programrevguide/2009ProgramReviewGuide.html
22
QUESTIONS?
23