Numerical Modelling of a Run-of-River Tailrace Canal
V. Hasmatuchi HES-SO Valais//Wallis School of Engineering Route du Rawyl 47 CH-1950 Sion Switzerland
F. Avellan EPFL Laboratory for Hydraulic Machines Av. de Cour 33bis CH-1007 Lausanne Switzerland
C. Münch HES-SO Valais//WallisSchool of Engineering Route du Rawyl 47 CH-1950 Sion Switzerland
Abstract Free-surface flow numerical simulations in the tailrace canal of the Swiss Lavey run-of-river hydro powerplant and flow measurements are performed to investigate its isokinetic potential with the aim of installing new technologies to recover the energy of rivers and artificial channels. The canal is supplied by the draft tubes of three Kaplan turbines through the tailrace tunnels. Two different inlet operating conditions are addressed: nominal discharge at the three tailrace tunnels and, respectively, zero discharge at the first with nominal discharge at the second and the third tailrace tunnels. Numerical simulations are performed using the commercial code ANSYS CFX 14.5.7, solving the incompressible unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations. The computational domain includes the full tailrace canal water passage from the inlet tunnels to the junction with the Rhône River. The results are validated with measured axial velocity profiles on 3 different cross sections and the water surface level at the inlet of the canal. The water surface level at the outlet of the canal is used as boundary condition. Then, the analysis is mainly focused on the flow configuration for the two different canal flow discharge. It is found that, depending on the number of turbines that operate at time, the flow configuration in the tailrace canal may vary a lot. These results are crucial for the selection of an optimal implantation location of an isokinetic turbine in order to recover a maximum of energy over the whole year for any operating condition.
Keywords: run-of-river tailrace canal, free-surface flow, numerical modelling, experimental validation
Nomenclature Cx [m/s] Axial velocity Re [-] Reynolds number |Cyz| [m/s] Magnitude of cross velocity S [m2] Surface dt [s] Time step St [-] Strouhal number Dh [m] Equivalent hydraulic diameter T [s] Time period f [Hz] Frequency x, y, z [m] Cartesian coordinates Fr [-] Froude number y+ [-] Dimensionless sublayer-scale distance g [m·s-2] Gravity ε [m2·s-3] Turbulent dissipation rate h [m] Water depth εQ [%] Inlet to outlet relative discharge error k [m2·s-2] Turbulent kinetic energy ʋ [m2·s-1] Kinematic viscosity kt [%] Time coefficient [kg·m-3] Water density l [m] Canal bottom width ω [s-1] Specific dissipation rate L [m] Canal length p [Pa] Static pressure Superscripts P [m] Perimeter ¯ Average value Q [m3·s-1] Discharge * Dimensionless value Qn [m3·s-1] Nominal discharge
Introduction Scheduled progressive shut-down of the Switzerland’s nuclear power plants requires the installation of new energy production units (Munch & Avellan [1]). In this context, alternative renewable energy sources must be reconsidered, including the unexploited small-hydro potential sites. The present work is related to the potential of the hydrokinetic energy of rivers and artificial channels. In the framework of the Hydro VS research project, the development of a new isokinetic turbine to recover the energy lost in rivers is conducted. The design and the optimization of the turbine are realized using numerical tools. The objective is the installation and testing of a prototype by the end of the year 2015. This study is mainly motivated by the need of knowing the full flow field in the pilot site, necessary for the development and, later, for the control of the prototype and the final products.
The meththe flow fthe first evaluatiodischargethe draft configuraTo this eperformeconditionat the firseach tailroutlet ofmeasured
Compareand cost-direction,any morevalidate opossible,
When simthe Hirt &volume iscapabilityexpensiveimprove t
The preseof the ncomputatsimulatioqualitativscenarios
1. Case1.1 Lave
The case side of Spowerplaundergrou
At the preThe wateal. [8]), eKaplan tutailrace tuover abou
hodology applfield in the whinstance, starn of the isok
e and water letubes of 3
ation (especialend, numericad in the full
ns have been ast with nominarace tunnel is f the domaind on 3 cross se
d to the expe-effective mea, Chevallet et e restricted onor even to supin order to co
mulating open& Nichols [3] s calculated iny to deal wite (Godderidgthe simulation
ent work intronumerical simtional domainons are then vve comparativs.
e study ey run-of-rive
study is repreSwitzerland oant (see Fig. 1und hydroelec
esent, the upser intake compensures a maxurbines recovunnels directlyut 600 m befo
F
lied in this stuhole canal. Thrting from inikinetic potentevels availableKaplan turbinlly at the upstal simulationscanal (includ
addressed: nomal discharge aused as inlet
. The numerections located
rimental appran to explore
al. [2] presennly to the studpport the desigope with the lim
ned channels, mapproach to cn the solutionth highly non
ge et al. [4]). n accuracy ma
oduces in a firsmulation moden, spatial discvalidated usinve analysis is
er power plan
esented by theon the Rhône) is composedctric plant and
tream dam hoposed by fourximum derivedvers the hydray connected wre reaching ag
Fig. 1. Schemat
udy consists ohe full 3D CAitial (dating fial of the can
e at its inlet annes, dependintream side of s of unsteadyding the tailraminal dischargt the second acondition, w
rical simulatiod respectively
roach, numericthe flow hydr
nts several exady of complexgn. Despite thmitation of th
most of the cocapture the fren process. Then-linear free-s
Anyway, derainly in cases w
st instance theelling is alsoretization and
ng velocity mefocused on th
nt
e tailrace canaRiver, chose
d of a run-of-rd a tailrace can
olds back the Rr windows of d discharge ofaulic power frwith the tailracgain the natura
tic representatio
of using expeAO geometry ofrom the 50’snal has been nd outlet secting on the avthe canal) no
y incompressiace tunnels) age at the three
and the third tawhereas the me
on results ary at the inlet, th
cal simulationrodynamics anamples that st
x large projecthese advantagehe existing num
ommercial CFee-surface. Inde main advantsurface shaperived modelswhen the gas
e case study, fo provided, id boundary ceasurements o
he flow config
al of the Laveyen as pilot siriver dam, annal.
Rhône’s water6 m x 14 m, f 220 m3/s. F
from 34 m to ce canal. The al course of th
on of the Lavey
erimental and of the Lavey ts) and recentperformed u
ions. With thevailable dischaot only may vaible homogenat prototype e tailrace tunnailrace tunneleasured waterre validated whe middle and
n presents thend to evaluatetates that, nowts, but are alses, experimenmerical model
FD codes basedeed, the volutages consist es, with the d
(e.g. Hänschis entrained u
followed by thncluding: turonditions. Thon 3 cross seguration in th
y run-of-riverite. Started-up
n underground
r at a height odisplaced on t
Fed by the hea42 m head. latest, presen
he river.
y run-of-river hy
numerical tootailrace canal 2D drawing
sing synchrone tailrace canaarge of the Rary a lot, but
neous multiphscale. Two d
nels and, respes. A constant r free surface with experimd the outlet of
e advantage ofe the hydrauliwadays, 3D hyo much more
ntal validation ls.
ed on the voluume fraction oon the methodrawback of h et al. [5]) hunder the free-
he operating crbulence modhe results of tections. Finalle whole cana
powerplant, ip in 1950, th
d headrace gal
of 8m above ththe right backadrace galleryThe flow exi
nts a regular tr
ydropower plan
ols to fully chhas been perf
gs. Then, a prnised measural randomly suRhône River,also remains
hase turbulentdifferent inlet ectively, zero discharge at tlevel is impo
mental velocityf the canal.
f being a relaic performancydraulic mode
e commonly oremains advi
ume of fluid mof each fluid inod robustness
being compuhave been pr-surface.
conditions. Andel, numericathe unsteady ly, the quanti
al for the two
installed in thhe Lavey hydllery of 4 km
he river bed ([k of the river y, the three veits the draft turapezoidal cro
nt.
haracterise formed, in reliminary ements of upplied by the flow unknown.
t flow are operating discharge
the inlet of osed at the y profiles
atively fast ces. In this els are not
operated to ised, when
method use n a control and on its utationally roposed to
n overview l scheme, numerical tative and simulated
he Western droelectric length, an
[6] & [7]). (Müller et
ertical-axis ubes by 3
oss section
1.2 The tailrace canal layout
In Fig. 2, the full 3D CAO geometry of the Lavey tailrace canal reconstructed from initial (dating from the 50’s) and recent 2D drawings is provided. One may be noticed that the canal presents a strong narrowing at the inlet section downstream the tailrace galleries. The upstream bridge is supported by the two piers that separate the three galleries. The downstream bridge is supported by 2 rectangular piers fixed in the river bed. Finally, in red – a fourth gallery and the modified inlet section of the canal (planed to be realised in the framework of the Lavey+ project [9]). The latest, remains available for a future hydrodynamic investigation and do not make the object of the current work.
Fig. 2. Lavey tailrace canal – isometric view of full 3D CAD reconstruction and photograph.
Fig. 3. Lavey tailrace canal – main geometrical dimensions and reference cross sections coordinates.
Fig. 4. Lavey tailrace canal – bottom coordinates.
The mainscaled wigreen – isections, computat
In Fig. 4length. Tdefined retrapezoidpiers of tare in goo 1.3 Wat
Time histdischargedischargethe two otime. Theenergy re
n geometrical ith the canal binlet and outlP1, P2 and P
tional domain
, the bottom The canal botteference cross
dal section, excthe downstreaod agreement
er depth and
tory of the cae values are ses over the saoperating condese conditionsecovery using
Fig. 6
dimensions obottom width,let water dept3; in black – outlet section
Fig. 5. Lav
coordinates (tom slope is s sections is pcepting the inm bridge are with the 3D g
d discharge
anal’s averagescaled with thme 3-year per
ditions consides are selected aisokinetic tec
6. Time history ov
f the canal are, l. The positith measuremezero referenc
n Sout.
vey tailrace can
scaled again babout 3/10’00
presented in Filet section Sm
shown. Finallgeometry reco
e daily dischahe nominal diriod. The timered in this stuas representathnologies.
∙100 %
of average dailyver a 3-year pe
e sketched in ion of severalent sections, ce section, Sre
nal – geometry o
by the canal 00 and is conig. 5. One ma
min where it is rly, on P1..3 sec
onstructed usin
arge over 3 yischarge of on
me coefficient udy are met retive in terms o
% - time coe
ly discharge (leferiod in the Lav
Fig. 3 from a l cross referenSm in and Sm
ef, downstream
of reference cro
bottom widthnstant. Moreoay notice that trectangular. Octions, the meng old and rec
ears is represne Kaplan turis defined in espectively aroof flow config
efficient
eft) and the rankvey tailrace can
top view persnce sections is
out; in blue –m bridge posi
oss sections.
h) are providever, the geomthe canal gene
On the Sbridge seeasured canal cent 2D drawin
ented in the lrbine. In the rEq. ( 1 ). Oneound 50% (2x
guration and v
ked discharges al.
spective. The s marked as f
– velocity meition section
ed along withmetry of the perally exhibitsection, the lefbed position ngs.
left side of Fright side – te may be obsxQn) and 30%velocity potent
(right)
values are follows: in asurement Sbridge and
h the canal previously s a regular ft and right and shape
ig. 6. The the ranked served that (3xQn) of tial for the
( 1 )
The lineaSm out, anscaled witurbine Qsections oby linear well.
1.4 Oper
The summzero dischdischargenumbers developedin the can
2. Mod2.1 Num
Numericafull canal2. The AAveragedusing the two-equaable to s(preferredbased on (Menter ein time) a[14], the
ar relationshipnd the total caith the canal bQn. In the righof the canal Δregression, ar
Fig. 7. Measu
rating condit
mary of the oharge at the f
e at the three are computed
d turbulent flonal, for both o
delling merical schem
al simulationsl (including th
ANSYS CFX d Navier-Stok finite volume
ation turbulencselect the optid in the bounda blending fu
et al. [13]). Anare used. The mtwo phases (a
p between the anal hourly disbottom width lht figure - thΔh*
Sm in-out withre represented
ured water depth
tions
operating condfirst with nomtailrace tunned at the P1 reow, whilst onperating cond
∙
C
1
2
me
s of unsteady ihe tailrace tun14.5.7 comm
kes (URANS)e method (seece model andimal turbulendary layer) at unction that con advection scmultiphase fre
air and water)
measured wascharge is prol, whilst the d
he variation oh the dischargd in red. The e
h-discharge rel
ditions for theminal dischargels (case 2). Teference secti
n the other handitions.
∙∙
∙ ∙ ∙
Table 1
Case Q*inlet
Q1 = 0
Q2 = Q3
Q = 2·Qn
Q1 = Q2
Q = 3·Qn
incompressiblnnels) at protot
mercial code [1 equations in Launder & Sthe Shear Str
nce model betany location iomputes the dcheme (2nd ordee-surface is sshare the sam
ater depth at tovided in the discharge Q* isof the water dge Q*. The aveequations of t
lationship at the
e two scenarioge at the seconThe dimensionion. On the ond the Froude
∙
∙ - Re
- Froud
1. Operating co
[-] R
= Qn
n
6’
= Q3 = Qn
n 9’
le homogeneotype scale. A 10] has been
n their conservSpalding [11])ress Transportween the k-εinto the domadistance from der in space) asolved using t
me flow field,
the inlet and oleft side of F
s scaled with tdepth differenerage water dthe correspond
e inlet and outl
os considered nd and the thinless Reynoldone hand, thee number show
eynolds numb
de number
nditions
Re [-] Fr
’852’664 0.1
’784’556 0.1
ous multiphasesummary of temployed to
vative form a). The set of eqrt (SST) modeε (preferred iain. The select
the wall usinand the backwhe homogenothe transporte
outlet sectionsFig. 7. The wathe nominal d
nce between tepth – discharding linear var
et of the Lavey
in this study ird tailrace tunds (Eq. ( 2 )) e Reynolds nuws a subcritica
er
[-]
49
89
e turbulent flothe numerical solve both th
and the mass quations is cloel (Menter [12n the free strtion of the mong the solutionward Euler impus model. As
ed quantities b
s of the canalater depth valdischarge of othe inlet and rge variations
ariations are pr
tailrace canal.
is provided innnels (case 1)and Froude (
umber suggesal flow regim
ow are performl setup is givenhe Unsteady conservation osed and solv2]). Indeed, thream regions)ost appropriaten of a Poisson
mplicit scheme stated in Harr
being the same
, Sm in and lues h* are ne Kaplan the outlet
s, obtained rovided as
n Table 1: ); nominal (Eq. ( 3 )) sts a fully
me (Fr < 1)
( 2 )
( 3 )
med in the n in Table Reynolds-equations
ed using a he latest is ) and k-ω e model is n equation (2nd order
rison et al. e for both.
The volumfor each.
The Stroustructureson this cois selecte
2.2 Com
As illustrscale - frhexahedr
me of fractionFinally, the v
uhal number, s developing iomputation. Cd.
mputational d
rated in Fig. 8rom the inlet ral cells (see F
n is specific tviscosity and th
∙
Eq. ( 4 ), hain the wake o
Concerning the
Tab
Simulation ty
Numerical m
Physical mod
Turbulence m
Time step
Convergence
domain and sp
8, the computtunnels to the
Fig. 9) has bee
Fig. 8. Co
o the phase, the density are
∙
as been used of the downstre convergence
le 2. Main para
ype
ethod
del
model
criteria
patial discret
tational domae junction witen generated u
mputational do
Fig. 9.
the free surface volume fract
∙
to determine ream bridge pe, the RMSmax
ameters of the n
Un
Fin
Mu
SS
0.1
RM
tization
ain includes thth the Rhône
using the ANS
omain of the ful
Spatial discret
ce being tracktion averaged
- Strouh
the expectedpiers. A time sx < 10-3 criteri
numerical simul
nsteady
nite volume
ultiphase homo
ST
1 [s]
MSmax < 10-3
he full tailraceRiver. An ad
SYS ICEM com
ll 3D Lavey tail
tisation.
ked by solvingin the transpo
hal number
d vortex frequstep of 0.1 s iion with 10 in
ation
ogeneous
e canal water dapted mesh ummercial soft
race canal.
g the transporort equations.
uency of the ais finally selecnternal coeffic
r passage - at using mostly tware.
rt equation
( 4 )
alternative cted based cient loops
prototype structured
The geneused for applied inresiduals
2.3 Boun
The detaiconstant measureda free slipsurfaces:
3. Resu3.1 Conv
The RMSmomentuduration trailing e(exceptinvalue onl
Case
1
2
eral mesh sizeboth cases. Tn order to copconvergence
ndary conditi
iled boundarydischarge at t
d water free sup wall conditicanal banks,
ults and anavergence
Smax < 10-3 haum for the two– see the res
edge of the dng the vortex ily after around
Simulation st
Initial
First refineme
Final (second
Initial
First refineme
Final (second
e information Then, two autpe with the neand realistic w
ions
y conditions imthe inlet of eaurface level alion is used. Ficanal bottom,
Surfa
Inlet
Outle
Top
Solid
alysis
as been impoo cases (final iduals history
downstream binduced fluctud 100 seconds
Table 3
tep
nt
d refinement)
nt
d refinement)
is provided intomatic refineeed of a finerwater surface
mposed on theach tailrace tunlong with a hyinally, smooth upstream and
Table 4
ace
et
surfaces
sed as convermesh refinem
y in Fig. 10. Obridge piers ruations), the is – see Fig. 11
Fig. 10. R
3. Spatial discre
Mesh type
Structured
Structured
n Table 3. Onement steps, br mesh at the solution.
e computationnnel is used aydrostatic presh no-slip walld downstream
4. Boundary con
Boundary
Inlet Q1 = 0 / Qn
Q2 = Q3 = Q
Outlet hout = hSm ou
pout = ·g·z
Free slip wa
Smooth no-
ergence criteriment) exhibit rOn the other remains relatiinlet to outlet .
RMS convergen
etisation
e Numb
d
4’
5’
6’
d
4’
5’
6’
ne may be notbased on the free-surface.
nal domain areas inlet conditssure profile il condition is
m bridge piers.
nditions
condition
[m3/s]
Qn [m3/s]
ut [m] [Pa]
all
-slip wall
ion. On the orelatively stabhand, despitevely constantrelative disch
nce history.
ber of nodes
559’076
957’681
574’673
559’076
940’509
652’480
ticed that an iwater volumeThis step is c
e provided in Ttion. At the ouis imposed. Onselected for th
one hand, the ble values ovee the fact thatt over the totharge error εQ
y+mean
488.398
651.966
identical initiae fraction critcritical in term
Table 4. Accoutlet of the do
On the top of thhe remaining
RMS of the er the whole st the water letal simulation
Q reaches a sm
al mesh is terion, are
ms of both
ordingly, a omain, the he domain solid wall
mass and simulation evel at the n duration mall stable
Fig. 11. Convergence history of mass conservation (left) and the water level at the trailing edge of the downstream bridge piers (right).
3.2 Experimental validation
Experimental measurements of flow velocity have been performed at the P1, P2 and P3 sections (see Fig. 3 ) using an Acoustic Doppler Current Profiler (ADCP) mounted on a radio-controlled boat equipped with a GPRS system. In Fig. 12, the axial velocity, scaled with the discharge velocity at the P1 section, is represented in comparison between the experimental measurements and instantaneous numerical simulation results. It may be noticed that the velocity profiles obtained by numerical simulation feet relatively well the measurements at the P2 and P3 sections. Nonetheless, at the P1 section, the numerical axial velocity profile is still similar to the experimental one at the right bank side, whilst being different on the left bank side. This inconsistence may be explained by some lack in the measurement data, since disturbances have been noticed at that region during the measurement process.
Fig. 12. Experimental validation – dimensionless axial velocity profiles.
Fig. 13. Experimental validation – water surface level in streamwise direction.
Finally, in Fig. 13, one may be stated that the water surface level obtained by numerical simulations is in good agreement with the one obtained from previous measurement data analysis (see Fig. 7). The slightly lower water surface level in the numerical simulation may be explained by the fact that the roughness of the real canal is not taken in consideration; therefore, the losses in the canal are lower with a direct impact on the water surface level. 3.3 Flow analysis for different canal flow discharge
The resulting water free-surface is illustrated in Fig. 14 for the two numerical simulations with the help of an iso-surface of water volume fraction. The streamlines projected on the water surface indicates a very different flow configuration in the canal depending on the number of turbines that operates at time. On the one hand, when all the three turbines operate at the same regime (case 2) the flow exiting the tailrace canal converge smoothly to the regular trapezoidal section of the canal. On the other hand, a large stagnation/recirculation region is noticed at the left bank side in front of the first tailrace tunnel since the discharge of the latest is zero. Indeed, this stagnation region is also observed on the axial velocity profile at the P1 section (see Fig. 12). Then, once arrived in the downstream regular section of the canal, there is no significant flow configuration difference between the two simulated scenarios.
Fig. 14. Free surface and velocity streamlines in the tailrace canal for two operating situations.
In Fig. 15, the axial velocity contours, scaled with the discharge velocity at the P1 section, are provided for both cases at the P1, P2 and P3 sections. In Fig. 16, the magnitude of the cross velocity |Cyz|, scaled again with the discharge velocity at the P1 section, demonstrates an almost completely axial flow configuration on the whole canal length. However, a large magnitude of the secondary flow is observed on the inlet section for the case where the discharge of the first tailrace tunnel is zero (case 1). This is explained by the presence of the stagnation/recirculation region on that section.
Fig. 15. Case 1 vs. case 2 – dimensionless axial velocity profiles.
Finally, astructureshas been has not bare not op
3.4 Disc
Boundarymultiphasmesh refiunsteady)numericacomparedcomplete the free-scomputat
The presescenariosto facilitalatest preperforman
F
as expected, ws is evidencedalready detec
been pushed fuptimised to all
Fig. 17. E
ussion
y conditions se problems (einement in the) comes to com
al result. Wrod to a comple set of numer
surface regiontional domains
ent work endss at the pilot siate the integresents the ad
ances.
Fig. 16. Case 1 v
when focusingd in the wake cted in the histfurther since tlow a fully pe
Evidence of Kar
play an impoe.g. free-surfae free-surface mplete the setong numericaetely unreal srical tests perfn may conducts.
s up with valiite. The compation into the
dvantage of c
vs. case 2 – dim
g on the downof the piers u
tory of the wahe constructe
ertinent quanti
rman vortices de
ortant role inace flow), the
region is a cat of parameteral setup may solution. Thisformed duringt to mass cons
idated free-suputational dome domain of acapturing the
mensionless mag
nstream bridgusing the λ2 cater level flucted spatial discification.
evelopment in t
n the numericcorrect setting
apital setting ars that makes t
conduct to ds statement isg this study. Iservation inco
urface flow numains and the a completely
free-surface
gnitude of cross
ge region (see riterion. Anywtuations, plottecretisation and
the wake of the
cal simulationg of boundaryas well. In thethe differencedivergence, ws not only baIt has been exonsistence, esp
umerical simuspatial discreimmerged isoeffects on th
s velocity profil
Fig. 17), a dway, the preseed in Fig. 11. d the choice o
downstream br
n setup. Whey conditions ise end, the sim between a fal
which is mayased on the lixperienced thapecially when
ulations for twtisation have bokinetic horizhe turbine op
les.
development oence of these The frequenc
of the turbulen
ridge piers.
en attemptings even crucial.
mulation type (alse and a fullyybe not the witerature, but at a too coarsen dealing with
wo canal flow been already
zontal-axis turperation and
of Karman structures
cy analysis nce model
g to solve . The right (steady vs. y pertinent worst case
also on a e mesh on very long
discharge conceived rbine. The hydraulic
Conclusions Free-surface flow numerical simulations in the tailrace canal of the Lavey run-of-river hydro powerplant have been performed to investigate its isokinetic potential in the view of installing new technologies to recover energy of rivers and artificial channels. The numerical simulation is performed using the ANSYS CFX 14.5.7 commercial code, solving the incompressible unsteady Reynolds-Averaged Navier-Stokes equations. The computational domain includes the full tailrace canal water passage from the inlet tunnels to the junction with the Rhône River. Depending on the number of Kaplan turbines operating at time, two different inlet operating conditions have been selected: nominal discharge at the three tailrace tunnels; zero discharge at the first with nominal discharge at the second and the third tailrace tunnels. The boundary conditions are completed with the measured water surface level imposed at the outlet of the canal. Finally, measured axial velocity profiles on 3 different cross sections of the canal as well as the water surface level at the inlet of the canal have been used to validate the results.
To sum up, it is found that, depending on the number of turbines that operate at time, the flow configuration in the tailrace canal may vary a lot. These results are crucial for the selection of the optimal implantation location of an isokinetic turbine in order to recover a maximum of energy over the whole year for any operating condition. In addition, the computational domain and the numerical setup allow, later on, including in the simulation the full isokinetic turbine as well. Acknowledgements
The present numerical investigation was carried out in the framework of Hydro VS applied research project, in partnership with the Laboratory for Hydraulic Machines from École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne, Switzerland, granted by the program The Ark Energy of the Ark – the foundation for innovation in Valais, Switzerland.
The authors would like to address a special thank to the “Services Industriels de Lausanne” and “Usine de Lavey” industrial partners for their approval and technical support in using the Lavey powerplant as case study. The Hydro Exploitation industrial partner is also thanked for the technical support in performing the velocity measurements. References 1. Münch-Alligné C., Avellan F., “Exploitation du potentiel de la petite hydraulique : Situation actuelle et exemple de
développement”, Bulletin ElectroSuisse, No. 2, pp. 41-45, 2013 2. Chevallet G., Jellouli M., Deroo L., “Democratization of 3D CFD hydraulic models : several examples performed with
ANSYS CFX”, SimHydro 2012: New trends in simulation, Sophia Antipolis, France, September 12-14, 2012 3. Hirt C.V., Nichols B.D., “Volume of Fluid (VOF) Method for the Dynamics of Free Boundaries”, Journal of
Computational Physics, 39, pp. 201-225, 1981 4. Godderidge B., Phillips A.B., Lewis S., Turnock S.R., Hudson D.A., Tan M., “The simulation of free surface flows
with Computational Fluid Dynamics”, 2008 ANSYS UK User Conference: Inspiring Engineering, Oxford, UK, October 29 - 30, 2008
5. Hänsch S., Lucas D., Höhne T., Krepper E., Montoya G., “Comparative simulations of free surface flows using VOF-methods and a new approach for multi-scale interfacial structures”, Proceedings of the ASME 2013 Fluids Engineering Division Summer Meeting, Incline Village, Nevada, USA, July 7-11, 2013
6. Services Industriels de Lausanne, “L’aménagement Hydroélectrique de Lavey - Brochure” , source: www.silnativa.ch/fileadmin/documents/silnativa.ch/Lavey.pdf - accessed on august 2014
7. Services Industriels de la Ville de Lausanne, “Lavey – Usine Hydro-Electrique de la Ville de Lausanne”, Ed. Annuaire Vaudois S.A., Lausanne, Switzerland, 1951
8. Müller M., Bieri M., Ribeiro Martins J., Boillat J.-L., Schleiss A., “Lavey Dam – Physical and numerical analysis of flow and sediment transport in the Rhone River”, La Houille Blanche, 6, pp. 60-66, 2010
9. Services Industriels de Lausanne, “Présentation du projet Lavey+”, 2012 source: http://www.fishfinder.ch/deutsch/news/2012/infotag/Amenagement%20hydroelectrique%20Lavey%20plus.pdf - accessed on august 2014
10. ANSYS CFX, Release 14.5.7, ANSYS Inc 11. Launder B.E., Spalding D.B., “The numerical computation of turbulent flow”, Computer Methods in Applied
Mechanics and Engineering, 3(2), pp. 269–289, 1974 12. Menter F.R., “Two-equation eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications”, AIAA Journal, 32(8),
pp. 1598-1605, 1994 13. Menter F.R., Kuntz M., Langtry R., “Ten Years of Industrial Experience with the SST Turbulence Model”, Turbulence,
Heat and Mass Transfer, 4, Begell House Inc., pp. 625-632, 2003 14. Harrison M.E., Batten W.M.J., Myers L.E., Bahaj A.S., “Comparison between CFD simulations and experiments for
predicting the far wake of horizontal axis tidal turbines”, IET Renew. Power Gener., 4(6), pp. 613–627, 2010
The Authors
Vlad Hasmatuchi graduated in 2007 at the Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Hydraulic Machinery Branch from “Politehnica” University of Timisoara, Romania. In the same year, Vlad Hasmatuchi joined the Laboratory for Hydraulic Machines from the École Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne (EPFL), Switzerland, to achieve a doctoral work in the field of hydraulic turbomachinery. In 2012 he got his Doctoral Degree in Engineering from the EPFL. Since 2012 he is Senior Research Assistant in the hydraulic energy research team at the HES-SO Valais//Wallis, School of Engineering in Sion, Switzerland. He is in charge mainly of experimental investigations, as well as of numerical simulations. His main research interests are the hydrodynamics of turbines, pumps and pump-turbines, including design and evaluation of hydraulic performance.
Prof. François Avellan graduated in Hydraulic Engineering from INPG, École Nationale Supérieure d'Hydraulique, Grenoble France, in 1977 and, in 1980, got his doctoral degree in engineering from University of Aix-Marseille II, France. Research associate at EPFL in 1980, he is director of the Laboratory for Hydraulic Machines since 1994 and was appointed Ordinary Professor in 2003.
Cécile Münch was born in Strasbourg in 1979. She obtained an engineering degree from INPG, École Nationale Supérieure d'Hydraulique, Grenoble France ENSHMG, department of Numerical and Modelling of Fluids and Solids in 2002. Then, she got her doctoral degree in 2005 at the INPG on numerical simulation of turbulence. From 2006 to 2010, she worked as a research associate in the Laboratory of Hydraulics Machines at EPFL on flow numerical simulations in hydraulic turbines. Since 2010, she is professor at the HES-SO Valais//Wallis, School of Engineering in Sion, Switzerland and head of the hydraulic energy research team.