7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
1/24
1
INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON
TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTIBILITY IN
GOVERNANCE: ISSUES AND CHALLENGES
On 13th & 14th October, 2012
Research Paper
TRACK:- PUBLIC HEARINGS IN PUBLIC INTEREST MATTER
:Transparency and Accountability in governance.
LEGISLATIVE PUBLIC HEARINGS AND POLITICS INTERMINGLED
Authors:
SHASHANK DUBEY
NISHANT PAL
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
2/24
2
ABSTRACTThis paper will be focused on Legislative Public Hearings which have the basic purpose to obtain
public input on Legislative decisions in the matter of policies and is less formal in nature. Legislative
Public Hearings are required by state law when a city or country addresses an issue involving wider
range of citizens and perhaps the entire jurisdiction. Public bodies such as city councils board of
county commissioners and planning commission are sometimes required by state law to hold public
hearings. Since the issues hearing are frequently contentious may involve due process but practically
a procedure are not spelled out in statutes that require hearings and there is no geared up guide for
public bodies to follow when conducting hearings. These contentious issues are however used by
Political Parties to propagate their political agendas in the name of public interest matter and the
result being that these procedures dont eliminate litigation over the issues addressed in hearings.
And so as the wisdom of legislative decisions reached as a result of such hearings are not
questioned or second-guessed by the courts and if challenged they are reviewed only to determine if
they are constitutional or violating state law. We in this paper will be discussing the importance of
distinguishing Public Hearings from Politics in the name of Public Interest matter. As taking the case
of recent reforms proposed in FDI policy of India which allows foreign Retail Giants like Walmart to
enter into Indian Retail market and hence violating the Right to livelihood of unorganized sector
and hampering the Socialistic base of the nation.
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
3/24
3
CONTENTS
AIM.........................................................................................................4
INTRODUCTION..................................................................... 5
CHAPTER I (PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: INTERPRETATION).................6
CHAPTER II (RIGHT TO INFORMATION)........................12
CHAPTER III (PUBLIC HEARING AND INDIAN SCENARIO)...............11
CHAPTER IV (Social Audit And Its Dimensions;)....................18
CHAPTER V (FDI in retail sector and its Political justification...................21
REFERENCES.........................................................................23
AUTHORS DETAILS..............................................................24
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
4/24
4
AIM
This paper is focused on portraying the need and importance of public participation
through public hearings in public interest matters and how public participation is interpreted
in different countries in legislative processes.Public participation with the legislative process
results in better laws and fewer amendments. Both transparency and accessibility of the
legislative process are required for effective public participation. India, being a democratic
country, faces major challenges regarding actual public participation of citizens since
political parties make public matters as their only chance to cover their vote bank and are
interested in opposing rather than solving the grievances of general public.
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
5/24
5
INTRODUCTION
Democratic country like India, legislation is a tool which can effect great transformation if it
is responsive to the needs of its poorest and most vulnerable sections. More often, however
the lawmaking process is dominated by the ministers justifying their own agenda and
technocratic civil servants and elites all of whom combine to make the legislation process
inaccessible to general public. Deficiencies in legislative process thus has its negative effects
on the quality of legislation and failure in transformed the social and economic order and the
reason being the disproportionate influence in passing any policy or bill. As such a situation
is observed in the recent policy of India for allowing 51 percent stake to FDI in retail sector
to which P.M. responds saying government care for aam aadmi but leaving a larger
unorganised sector helpless and may influence lead to the close of their only means of
livelihood and in place affecting the Right to livelihood of that section of public.
India has already taken the first important step towards open government by enacting the
robust Right to information Act ,in 2005. The national advisory council has also voiced the
concerns of nongovernmental organisations (NGOs) and successfully influenced the policy
and legislation recent years. However, the relevant contribution of a joint government civil
society draft a strong Anti- corruption Bill following Mr. Anna Hazare campaign highlights
the importance of strengthening and institutionalization public participation in the legislative
process.
Public participation can be regarded as a way of empowerment and as a vital part of
democratic governance. Participatory process is seen as the facilitator of collective
intelligence and inclusiveness , shaped by the desire for the participation of the wholecommunity or society. Public participation is a part of people centred human centric
principals which have emerged in western culture over last thirty years, and has had same
bearings of education business public policy and international relief and developmental
programs it may be advanced as a part of peoples first paradigm shift And will lead to
more transparent fair accountable and participatory legislative process which is needed by the
contemporary time to bring a real change.
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
6/24
6
CHAPTER I
PUBLIC PARTICIPATION: INTERPRETATION
The International Association for Public Participations Case Values1
1. Public Participation is based on the belief that those who are affected by a decisionhave a right to be involved in the decision making process.
2. Public Participation includes a provision that public contribution will influence adecision.
3.
Public participation promotes sustainable decision by recognising and communicatingthe needs and interests of all participants, including decision making.
4. Public participation seeks and facilitates the involvement of those potentially affectedby or interested in a decision.
5. Public participation seeks inputs from participants in how6. Public participation provides participation with information7. Public participation communicates to participants how these inputs affected the
decision.
Also; the NCPRI National Campaign for Peoples Right to Information, a platform of
individuals and organisation committed to making Indian Government more transparent and
accountable.
The NCPRI along with the press council of India has been instrumental informing the initial
draft of Right to Information Act. Concerned by the passage of legislation which
systematically ignores public participation by disadvantaged section of Indian society and
emphasize the importance of deeper consultation with citizens.
Accordingly, consultation must be conducted with citizen during the preparation of draft bills
and how does the govt. respond to public comments.
1The International Association for public participations case values
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
7/24
7
The United Nations Human Rights Committees General comment provides states with
interpretative guidance to the rights contained in the ICCPR.2
General comment on the Article 25Every citizen shall have the right and the opportunity,
without any of the distinctions and without unreasonable restitution
(a)To take part in the conduct of Public affairs, directly or through freely chosenrepresentatives.
Outlines of key features of the Right:
(1)The right to take part in public affairs extended to all exercises of political powers
including the exercise of legislative powers.
(2) This participation can take two possible form: direct participation or indirect
participation through representatives.
(3) Furthermore, citizen exercise their right to participation through public debate and
dialogue with their representatives.
(4) States must take such legislative and other measures or may be necessary to ensure
that citizens an effective opportunity to enjoy the right to take part in political processes.
Thus it may be argued that in Robust Democracies with a strong need of participation in
public affairs, also the Article 25 right imposes a duty to ensure participation in law
making processes at the very least, it grounds a strong principled argument for the
recognition of such an entitlement, and in reference of those countries which have taken
better steps in the direction of public participation as an essential element.
2 These general comments merely assist states in classifying the content of these rights and are not binding law.
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
8/24
8
Case Study of South Africa;
Legislative authority in South Africa is divided between the national parliament
(comprised of two houses; The National Assembly and The National Council of
Provinces), the nine provincial legislatures, and municipal councils. The South African
Constitution3
imposes a duty to facilitate public participation on each of these legislative
authorities.
Since, 2006, the constitutional court has given substantial attention to facilitate public
involvement in the legislative and other processes of the national and provincial
legislatures.
In its landmark judgement in Doctors for life International v. Speaker of the national
Assembly (2006) 2 ACC 11:2006
Court held : these provisions provide a right and impose a duty to ensure public
participation in the law making process. If a legislative authority fails to comply with this
duty in passing legislation , then that legislation is constitutionally invalid may be struck
down.
Court also held, it is the constitutional duty to facilitate public involvement and the rightto public involvement in legislative processes must be interpreted in light of the
international law, as enshrined in Article 2 of ICCPR.
As a result it provided not only opportunity through public hearings, but are also under a
duty to provide information and to build Public capacity for involvement.
3Constitution of The Republic South Africa, 1996
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
9/24
9
Case Study of Canada:
Government policy becomes law via a three step process;
The cabinet stage
The parliamentary stage The entering into force stage
Unlike South Africa , which has a constitutional duty to facilitate public participation , in
Canada , permission to consult must be obtained either from the cabinet or the Prime
Minister depending upon the type of draft bill involved.
The strength of the policy commitment towards the public consultation is witnessed in the
department ofJustices Policy Statement and guidelines for Public Participation4
It is a policy tool that enables department of justice managers and officials to frame the
departments public participation activities. It outlines the commitment on the part of the
department to involve Canadians in the development of legislations,policies,programs and
services through adequately resourced processes that are transparent , accessible and
accountable supported be factual information and are inclusive of Canadas diversity.
Problem faced with the implemental participatory procedures:-
Costs to participants;- The policy statement points out the costs that individuals and
groups may incur through participation.
Inadequately of Time:-
Resource constraints affect the ability of citizens to effectively provide input.
Consequently they must be given sufficient time to adequately consider , internallyconsult and respond to the consultation within time frames which strike a reasonable
balance between the departments need to get something accomplished expedititly and the
need for participants to be involved in a meaningful way.
4 /eng/couns/pol.html.Available at http://www. Justice.gc..ca
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
10/24
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
11/24
11
CHAPTER II
Right to Information:
Government information is a national resource. Neither the particular government of the day,
nor public officials, creates information for their own benefit. This information is generated
for the purposes related to the legitimate discharge of their duties of office, and for the
service of public for whose benefit the institutions of government exist, and who ultimately
(through one kind of import or another) fund the institutions of government and the salaries
of officials. It follows that government and officials are 'trustees' of the information of the
people. Nonetheless, there are in theory at least, numerous ways in which information can
be accessible to members of the public in a parliamentary system. The systemicdevices promote the transfer of information from government to parliament and the
legislatures, and from these to the people. Members of the public can seek information from
their elected representatives. Annual reporting requirements, committee reports,
publication of information and administrative law requirements also increase the flow of
information from government to the citizen. Recent technological advances also help to
reduce further the gap between the 'information rich' and the 'information'.
However, in spite of India's status as the world's most populous
democratic state, there was not until recently any obligation at village, district,
state or national level to disclose information to the peopleinformation was essentially
protected by the colonial secrets Act 1923, which makes the disclosure of official
information by public servants an offence. The colonial legacy of secrecy, distance and
mystification of the bureaucracy coupled with a long history of one party dominance proved
to be a formidable challenge to transparency and effective government let alone an
effective right to information secretive government is nearly always inefficient in that the free
flow of information is essential if problems are to be identified and resolved. Need for RTI
Legislation Information can empower poor communities to battle the
circumstances in which they find themselves and help balance the unequal
power dynamics that exist between people marginalized through poverty and their
governments. This transparent approach to working also helps poor communities to be visible
on the political map so that their interests can be advanced. The right to information is
therefore central to the achievement of the Millennium Development goals.
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
12/24
12
The Right to Information Act 2005 provides effective access to information for citizens of
India, which is under the control of the public authorities. It promotes transparency and
accountability in the working of every public authority. It extends to the whole of India
except the state of Jammu and Kashmir. In order to ensure greater and more effective access
to information, it was decided to repeal the Freedom of Information Act, 2002 and enact
another law for providing an effective framework. To achieve this object, the Right to
Information Bill was introduced in the Parliament and was passed by the Lok Sabha on 11th
May, 2005 and by the Rajya Sabha on 12th May, 2005 and it received the assent on 15th
June, 2005. It came on the Statute Book as THE RIGHT TO INFORMATION ACT, 2005
(22 of 2005).
Right to information legislation therefore acquired fundamental attention for the
development of society.5
RTI laws gained prominence as critical tools to combat corruption,
and inefficiency. Although corruption exists in all societies, it has a particularly pernicious
effect on less developed countries. As also acknowledged by donor agencies, corruption
discourages foreign investment and eats away at the budgets allocated to public procurements
which enable basic infrastructure such as roads, schools and hospitals to be built. It also
debilitates political institutions by reducing public confidence in their operation. If unbridled
corruption continues to infect a society or political system, it may eventually lead to socialinterest due to the division it creates between those who have easy access to goods and
services and those who remain excluded. It is the poor who always bear the greatest burden
of a corrupt society.
In India today, the state has spread its tentacles to virtually every aspect of public
life. The person on the street is condemned to grapple hopelessly with corruption in almost
every aspect of daily work and living. Most government offices typically present a picture of
a client public bewildered and harassed by opaque rules and procedures and inordinate
delays, constantly vulnerable to exploitation by employees and touts.
5THE MOVEMENT FOR RIGHT TO INFORMATION IN INDIA : Peoples Power for the Control of
Corruption By Harsh Mander and Abha Joshi
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
13/24
13
CHAPTER III
PUBLIC HEARING AND INDIAN SCENARIO
Jan Sunwai or Public Hearing is a process by which people who may be affected by a
particular action or decision have the opportunity to ask questions, make submissions or
register objections to a panel of experts. The panel may comprise of elected representatives,
government officials, non-government organizations, experts from the field, media, etc. It is a
formal meeting designed to provide the public with an opportunity to express their support or
opposition for any project or scheme in an open forum. Such hearings are especially useful
for people living in rural areas and small towns. It gives them a platform to voice their
concerns and provides for speedy justice and instant resolution.6
These hearings help the citizens affected by a reviewing board's decision an
opportunity to have their views heard before decisions are made. It is a formal meeting
designed to provide the public with the fullest opportunity to express support of or opposition
to a transportation project in an open forum where the oral interaction are recorded. In a
public hearing issues relating to environment, related to displacement, eviction of persons or
families and their rehabilitation. It is a way of giving powers to the public to ask any
questions in effect making the government or the authority answerable in such hearings. The
main purpose of most public hearings is to obtain public testimony or comment. Such
hearings are especially useful for people living in the rural areas who do not have easy access
to courts. These people can avail the opportunity of being heard through the mechanism of
public hearing, which definitely provides for speedy justice and instant resolution of
problems. Public hearing becomes a useful tool in providing a voice to the voiceless who
have faced injustice and who do not have the necessary resources to approach courts. These
hearings are organized by the government and as well as by various Non -Governmental
Organizations.
Referring to the concept of Legislative public hearing which is to obtain public input on
legislative decisions on matters of policy. Legislative public hearings are required by state
law when a city or county addresses such matters as comprehensive land use plans or the
annual or biennial budget. Legislative public hearings do not involve the legal rights of
6file:///D:/DOx/Research/imp/Public%20Hearing%20-%20Author%20-%20Nidhi%20Singh.htm
http://d/DOx/Research/imp/Public%20Hearing%20-%20Author%20-%20Nidhi%20Singh.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Public%20Hearing%20-%20Author%20-%20Nidhi%20Singh.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Public%20Hearing%20-%20Author%20-%20Nidhi%20Singh.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Public%20Hearing%20-%20Author%20-%20Nidhi%20Singh.htm7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
14/24
14
specific, private parties in a contested setting, but rather affect a wider range of citizens or
perhaps the entire jurisdiction.
The whole process of public hearing comprises of three stages. It begins with a door-to-door
survey of the poorest and needy families in the backward areas of the town. Based on the
survey a report on various issues in the implementation of these schemes is prepared for the
the public hearing. During the public hearing, citizens are invited to voice their grievances in
front of the panel comprising of the chief municipal officer, elected representatives, senior
journalists and citizen leaders. Grievances raised during the public hearing are resolved
immediately and decisions are taken for other issues raised by the public. After the public
hearing a follow-up of decisions taken is done to ensure the implementation of these
decisions.
Role of MKSS (MAZDOOR KISAAN SHAKTI SANGATHAN) :
The mode of public hearings is not new, but the village based Jan Sunwai as an open
democratic platform to verify information and entitlements was a breakthrough in peoples
action. The MKSS has used it with people to share information, and examine the validity and
details of official records. The Public Hearings have been both social audits of work done and
a kind of forum for ascertaining the (truth) about the nature of democratic functioning at themost tangible and immediate level: the village Panchayat. It has allowed for the expression of
genuine peoples opinions and has empowered them, leading to an understanding of both the
machinations of corruption and the way it can be fought.
They began by demanding transparency of financial records of expenditure in the
Panchayat; the village council. Their demand for transparency, accountability, social audit
(public audit by the people) and redressal (including the return of stolen public money),
began with the first Public Hearing the MKSS organised in 1994.7
The first set of Public Hearings was preceded by unofficially accessing the documents, as
there was no legal entitlement. The contents of these documents were then shared and
verified with the residents of the area. People came together on the date of the public hearing
to testify and audit the work executed by their village council, and government officials. The
revelations of these first few public hearings led to an immediate and sharp reaction from
7 Transparency and accountability in Governance and Right to Information in India by Sheila Rai
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
15/24
15
government officials, who refused to share information and made it clear that in their view
people had no right to access such documents.
The MKSS began a sustained struggle which was to last for three years, before they could get
the assurances implemented- changing the Panchayat Raj Rules and widening the scope of
their demands to the Peoples Right to Information from all bodies that had an impact on
public interest.8
Their first set of demands was met in July 1997 when the Panchayati Raj Rules were
amended by the Government of Rajasthan.
The public hearings held after these amendments have had a dramatic impact. Elected
representatives and officials found guilty of corruption have publicly returned money, and
ordinary citizens have seen how the right to access documents gives them an opening to ask
questions and receive answers from those who rule. Today people are grappling with working
out the modes by which people can effectively audit the decisions of those who rule in their
name.
Jan Sunwai in Madhya Pradesh :
Since June 23, 2009 up to July 2012, 137 sessions of Jan-Sunwai have been held in which1,26,209 applications were received. Of these, 1, 22,555 applications (97 per cent) have been
disposed of. During year 2011, 32,769 applications were received. Of these, more than
31,000 applications have been disposed of. During the same year, cent percent applications
received by womens desks at district level police stations have been disposed of. Almost all
the 7,368 applications received by these desks have been redressed.
The basic objective of Jan-Sunwai is to bridge the gap between the police and
common people. Gupta has entrusted responsibility of making Jan-Sunwai more effective in
zones to Additional Directors General of Police. These officers review pending cases in their
respective jurisdiction and get them disposed of promptly. Zone in-charges review cases
every quarter and send their reports to Director General of Police.
Additional Director General of Police informed that most of the applications received at Jan-
Sunwai are disposed of promptly. Time-limit is fixed for the applications, which cannot be
redressed immediately. Notably, off late the public hearings have also commenced in the
8Transparency and accountability in Governance and Right to Information in India by Sheila Rai.
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
16/24
16
municipal corporations and a number of people are approaching to the Commissioners and
Mayors to get their problems solved.
Case Study 1:
Debate on nuclear power project at Jaitapur is ongoing on various levels. Environmental
effects of nuclear power and geological issues have been raised by anti nuclear activists of
India against this power project. Even though The Government of Maharashtra state
completed land acquisition in January 2010, only 33 out of the 2,335 villagers have accepted
compensation cheques as of November 2010. A public hearing on the environmental impact
assessment (EIA) Report, prepared by NEERI was conducted by Maharashtra Pollution
Control Board, on behalf of Ministry of Environment and Forests on 16 April 2010, at the
plant site. The public hearing became controversial as the EIA report was not delivered for
study to 3 of the 4 Gram Panchayat (local village bodies) a month in advance. A Public
Interest Litigation (PIL) has also been filed against the governments civil nuclear program at
the apex Supreme Court. The PIL specifically asks for the "staying of all proposed nuclear
power plants till satisfactory safety measures and cost-benefit analyses are completed by
independent agencies".
Case Study 2:
JANSUNWAI ON PDS IMPLEMENTATION IN URBAN WARDS OF RAIPUR CITY
PDS is flagship program of the Chhattisgarh State and it is known for the better policy and
implementation of this scheme. Samarthan an NGO conducted study in two urban wards of
Raipur city to assess the efficacy of PDS implementation.They interviewed beneficiaries of
various categories, fair price shop keeper, elected representative and food inspectors to
understand the overall performance of the programme. The study reveals various facts
regarding exclusion of poor, complaints for quality and quantity of food grain, difficulties
face by elected representatives in monitoring of the programme. In the view of these
unexpected loopholes and malpractices we decided to hold public hearing. It was the first
Jansunwai organized on 26th March 2011, on implementation of PDS in Chhattisgarh
state.9
9file:///D:/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%A8%20%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%
81%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%88)%20%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htm
http://d/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%9C%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%20%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B8%C3%A0%C2%A5%C2%81%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B5%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%BE%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%88)%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%9C%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%20%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B8%C3%A0%C2%A5%C2%81%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B5%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%BE%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%88)%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%9C%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%20%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B8%C3%A0%C2%A5%C2%81%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B5%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%BE%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%88)%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%9C%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%20%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B8%C3%A0%C2%A5%C2%81%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B5%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%BE%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%88)%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%9C%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%20%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B8%C3%A0%C2%A5%C2%81%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B5%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%BE%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%88)%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%9C%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%20%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B8%C3%A0%C2%A5%C2%81%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B5%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%BE%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%88)%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htm7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
17/24
17
Case Study 3:
A Public Hearing organized by Jan Shakti Dal and the Sahariya Jan Andolan, two local
sangathan(union) at Shivpuri district which is 100km to south-west of Gwalior. The Madhav
Lake in the Madhav National Park located on the outskirts of Shivpuri town has for the first
time in 50 yrs gone almost dry. The government provides impressive figures of relief works,
fodder and water provided to the drought-hit. The people living in the village have to trek
kilometres to collect water and claim that they see no trace of government supplies of grain or
fodder. Around 600-700 people attended the public hearing. Everyone told a tale of non-
receipt of water/grain/fodder in their villages, of cattle deaths, late payments for backbreaking
work done on relief sites, low payments of the work done. According to the government
drought is a? Condition of deficient rainfall coupled with a significant fall in agriculture
output, falling to below 37% of the normal output or production? According to Madhya
Pradesh Gazette, the state government declared a drought in all seven tehsils of Shivpuri
district. This decision was based on the indicators established by the government. drought in
all seven tehsils of Shivpuri district. This decision was based on the indicators established by
the government.
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
18/24
18
CHAPTER IV
Social Audit And Its Dimensions;
Social audit or public audit is a step in that direction. People use right to information to obtain
details of the works carried out by a Government Department or the manner in which that
Department spent the money. This information contained in records is compared with field
reality. This is public audit or social audit and is a very important tool in the hands of the
people to hold the Government accountable. Social audit assumes greater importance in the
context of democratic decentralization since 1992-93. Structures for accountability are the
weakest in Panchayat and municipal bodies who are implementing anti-poverty programmes
and providing basic social services. The people have gained unprecedented access to
information about, for instance whose names were listed as workers in the muster rolls the
amount of money stated to have been paid to them as wages the details of various materials
claimed to have used in the contribution and so on.10
Social audit may be regarded as being at the extreme end of the spectrum of audit
functions. Over the centuries, audit functions have grown and evolved starting from the most
ancient kind which may be called vigilance audit which was concerned mainly with the
detection of frauds. Then came, in more or less chronological order, regularity audit,
propriety audit, value for money audit, performance audit and lastly social audit. We may
regard the last three of these audit functions as representing economy, efficiency and
effectiveness audit. As far as State Audit is concerned, in value for money audit and
performance audit, it examines areas internal to government agencies. In social audit, it goes
beyond these areas and examines the impact of specific governmental activities on certain
sections of the society which are in contact with the government agencies.
Social Obligations and Social Welfare Programmes
In a welfare State, the government has a total obligation for the well-being of the people. This
is translated in practical terms into a concern for the improvement of the "quality of life"
through improving standards of living, health, education, earning capacity etc. for the people.
10
Social audit: Gram Sabha and Panchayat Raj
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
19/24
19
While each individual social welfare programme has its specific goals, it should also ensure
that it does not come in the way of the Government's efforts in other areas.
The symptoms of social problems which has to be tackled through a programme and its cause
almost always exist at several levels For example, at the first level the problem's symptom
may be high incidence of illness and its cause may be lack of adequate living space, sanitary
facilities etc. At the second level, the symptom to be tackled is precisely the cause at the first
level, namely inadequate living space etc. and its cause may be insufficient income level in
the families concerned. At the third level, the symptom to be tackled will be insufficient
income level and its cause may be a lack of education and training which prevent the head of
the family from obtaining and holding a job capable of providing adequate family income.
Apart from such vertical symptom-cause relationship, there are parallel linkages such as
environmental pollution, quality of water supply, availability of nutritious food etc. No social
welfare programmes can thus succeed in isolation but can do so only as a part of a total
package of welfare activities undertaken by the government arising from its concern for
improving the quality of life of the people.
Social Obligations of Public Utilities
Utilities are set up to meet certain social obligations by offering certain public services suchas water, power transport etc. which are essential to meet the totality of social obligations. As
going concerns, their responsibilities are to function economically and efficiently and
generally along accepted commercial lines. The fact that their activities might be subsidised
by the state in order to reach the services to the public at reasonable rates does not in any way
mitigate the need to function economically and efficiently within the constraints under which
they have to function. Normal commercial audit, built round value for money audit and
performance audit deals with these areas.
Public utilities, as well as all public undertakings, have other internal and external social
obligations over and above economic and efficient functioning and over and above the need
to fit into the states' total concern for improving the quality of life. Consider for example, the
effect of a public utility on the community in which it is located. The utility consumes land,
water, air, the services of other utilities and has various effects upon the community. Once he
is satisfied about the quality of the direct service which he receives from the utility, the
citizen of the community would be concerned with the "social performance" of the utility.Specifically he would like to know such things as the long term plans of the utility for
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
20/24
20
expansion and diversification which will have their impact on the local economy. He would
like to know something about its effect on the stability of local employment levels; local
taxes paid by it; its contribution to local charities; labour relation; hiring, promotion and pay
practices; air, water, and noise pollution; power and water consumption; plant appearance;
traffic flow; impact on local politics; contribution to research and import substitution, support
to local industries etc. These are the various internal and external social obligations which
should come under the scrutiny of social audit as distinct from economy and efficiency
audits. Social audit of a public utility or a public undertaking is thus one step ahead of
effectiveness audit which would be concerned mainly with assessing how effectively the
main function of the undertaking is being discharged.
Case Study:
A social audit was conducted by Parivartan, a citizen's initiative, along with the local
residents of two resettlement colonies of North East Delhi- Sundernagri and New Seemapuri-
for the development works undertaken by the Engineering Department of the Municipal
Corporation of Delhi (MCD). Only works pertaining to construction of roads, lanes and
drains and installation of handpumps were taken up for social audit a total of 68 contracts
worth about Rs. 1.42 crores. On 14th December a public hearing was organized in
Sindernagri by Parivartan along with the National Campaign for People's Right to
Information (NCPRI) and Mazdoor Kisan Shakti Sangathan (MKSS) of Rajasthan to discuss
publicly the works audited. Out of the 68 works audited and discussed in the public hearing,
calculations of estimated misappropriation of funds have been done for 64 works worth Rs
1.3 crore. In these 64 works the total amount of embezzlement found on account of missing
items/works is approximately Rs 70 lakhs (i.e. items or works worth about 70 lakhs do not
physically exist at all in these 64 works). Some examples of missing items are : 29 hand
pumps with electric motor had to be installed. But the residents of this area report that only
14 hand pumps have been installed which is also without electric motor. The thickness of
cement concrete layer in the street should be 10 cm, according to the bills. But thickness in
most of the cases is 5 cm as found after digging. There are some roads, which exist only on
papers.11
11THE QUEST FOR TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY IN GOVERNANCE IN INDIA: AN
INTROSPECTION by Vinod Vyasulu
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
21/24
21
CHAPTER V
FDI in retail sector and its Political justification
Taking the recent FDI policy allowing 51% stake in multi brand retail ; PM Manmohan Singh
aggressively pushed for governments recent decision on economic reforms that triggered
widespread political protests across the country. Giving and justifying reasons that prompted
the government to allow FDI in multibrand retail, according to PM the decision will
strengthen AAM AADMI and boost unemployment in the country , and trusted on the
message that the decision were taken in national interest.
This decision of going ahead with FDI in multibrand retail has evoked angry reactions fromthe Trinamool Congress which has decided to quit the UPA government , UPAs outside
allies like Samajwade Party and JD-S as well as opposition parties are also agitated over the
decision and had organised a nationwide BANDH. Also the Congress slammed BJP for
playing negative politics arguing the main opposition party should play the role of a
responsible opposition as was done by Congress when it was not in power.
The recent political controversies portrait and image of party politics rather going for
obtaining public participation or consent of the sector getting affected as in this case :
Unorganised sector. Here unorganised sector will have loose their jobs and in place
infringing their right to livelihood which is an extension ofright to life12
which says , if
right to livelihood is not treated at par with constitutional right to life, the easiest way of
depriving a person of his right to life would be to deprive him of his means to livelihood13
to the point of abrogation , as due to their policy any giant organisation such as Wal-Mart and
Tesco that will displace several mom & pop shops14
.
In place government is interested in convincing the people and avoiding the chances of
criticization by opposing parties and also, the parties against made it as a their political
agenda , as the party supporting wishes to rally out and to convince the people whereas the
party opposing plays their politics through bands as observed when , Delhi Chief Minister
Sheila Dixit was especially called for the meeting , which saw members suggesting that
12Consumer Education and Research Centre v. Union of India(1995) 3 SCC 42
13Protection of life and personal liberty No person shall be deprived of his life or personal liberty except
according to procedure established by law.
14Impact of Organized Retailing on the Unorganized Sector, ICRIER, May 2008
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
22/24
22
rallies should be held at district level to convince the people about the need to bring in the
measures like allowing multibrand retailing rather than hearing their grievances.
Government proposes the FDI policy as a necessity for the nation in the times where its GDP
is dwindling and inflation is one rises. The implication of the policy is not so positive and
flawless as projected by the government and need to be reviewed profoundly by policy
makers and shouldnt blindly head towards sealing the fate of thousands of lines living in the
country. As soon as government showed intentions of allowing FDI in Multi-Brand Retail
sector it sparked an agitation in Kirana Shop owner community that got out in street in large
numbers to protest against this stand of government. With news of Wal-Mart showing interest
in Indian market ignited a country wide debate involving economists, intellectuals, shop
owners, students etc. Everyone voicing their diverse views but these views were never given
heed by the government as they never considered it significant. This policy affects public at
large and is being projected as a stride which will being benefits for Indian consumers.
In midst of all this discussions between government, opposition party and the Left have been
nothing more that politically driven and ideologically stereotyped arguments. Not many
constructive arguments were formed which could be commonly consented by all parties.
The first step to critically scrutinize a policy is to bring it in front of the public. There wasnever the intention of the ruling party as it always escaped from its accountability towards the
action. IF it was open and confident enough of its decision to let FDI in multi-brand then it
would have sponsored and promoted public discussion and would not have turned a blind eye
when Kirana shop owners organized rallies throughout the nation. Never was a Public
Hearing held to listen to the grievances of people employed under unorganized retail sector.
This ignorant attitude of government not only infuriated the small retailers but also the rest of
the nation which waited for government to listed to their suggestions and doubts regarding
the policy and clear the mist surrounding the so called urgency to allow FDI in multi-brand
retail sector. Innovative government measures could further mitigate adverse effects on
small retailers and traders but what government needs to do at first is to evaluate the policy
by keeping in mind the future implications of it. These grim situation can be avoided by
studying the foreign policy model of countries that allowed FDI in multi-brand retail sector
and were still able to save its domestic retail market from getting affected and didnt allowed
companies like Wal-Mart to create their monopoly in the nation.
7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
23/24
23
REFERENCES:
1. A Comparative survey of procedures for public participation in the law-makingprocess : NCPRI, 2011.
2. Public Interest Litigation: Legal Aid & Lok Adalats, Mamta Rao.3. Constitutional Law, MP Jain.4. Constitutional Law of India, JN Pandey5. Impact of Organized Retailing on the Unorganized Sector, ICRIER, May 2008.6. Public Engagement with the Legislative Process7. 3. FDI IN INDIAN RETAIL SECTOR: ANALYSIS OF COMPETITION IN AGRI-
FOOD SECTOR
8. 4. 6. Transparency and accountability in Governance and Right to Information inIndia by Sheila Rai
9. 7. Social audit: Gram Sabha and Panchayat Raj10.8. THE MOVEMENT FOR RIGHT TO INFORMATION IN INDIA : Peoples
Power for the Control of Corruption By Harsh Mander and Abha Joshi
11.9. THE QUEST FOR TRANSPARENCY AND ACCOUNTABILITY INGOVERNANCE IN INDIA: AN INTROSPECTION by Vinod Vyasulu
WEBSITES
file:///D:/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%A8%20%E0%A4%B8%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4
%88)%20%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htm
file:///D:/DOx/Research/imp/Public%20Hearing%20-%20Author%20-%20Nidhi%20Singh.htm
http://www.mrsc.org/focuspub/hearings.aspx http://www.co-intelligence.org/CIPol_publicparticipation.html http://www.righttoinformation.org/. file:///D:/DOx/Research/imp/Mazdoor%20Kisan%20Shakti%20Sangathan%20%C2%
BB%20Story%20of%20MKSS.htm
http://d/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%9C%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%20%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B8%C3%A0%C2%A5%C2%81%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B5%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%BE%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%88)%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%9C%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%20%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B8%C3%A0%C2%A5%C2%81%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B5%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%BE%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%88)%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%9C%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%20%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B8%C3%A0%C2%A5%C2%81%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B5%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%BE%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%88)%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%9C%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%20%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B8%C3%A0%C2%A5%C2%81%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B5%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%BE%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%88)%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%9C%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%20%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B8%C3%A0%C2%A5%C2%81%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B5%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%BE%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%88)%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%9C%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%20%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B8%C3%A0%C2%A5%C2%81%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B5%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%BE%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%88)%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Public%20Hearing%20-%20Author%20-%20Nidhi%20Singh.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Public%20Hearing%20-%20Author%20-%20Nidhi%20Singh.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Public%20Hearing%20-%20Author%20-%20Nidhi%20Singh.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Public%20Hearing%20-%20Author%20-%20Nidhi%20Singh.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Public%20Hearing%20-%20Author%20-%20Nidhi%20Singh.htmhttp://www.mrsc.org/focuspub/hearings.aspxhttp://www.mrsc.org/focuspub/hearings.aspxhttp://www.co-intelligence.org/CIPol_publicparticipation.htmlhttp://www.co-intelligence.org/CIPol_publicparticipation.htmlhttp://www.righttoinformation.org/http://www.righttoinformation.org/http://d/DOx/Research/imp/Mazdoor%20Kisan%20Shakti%20Sangathan%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Story%20of%20MKSS.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Mazdoor%20Kisan%20Shakti%20Sangathan%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Story%20of%20MKSS.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Mazdoor%20Kisan%20Shakti%20Sangathan%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Story%20of%20MKSS.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Mazdoor%20Kisan%20Shakti%20Sangathan%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Story%20of%20MKSS.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Mazdoor%20Kisan%20Shakti%20Sangathan%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Story%20of%20MKSS.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Mazdoor%20Kisan%20Shakti%20Sangathan%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Story%20of%20MKSS.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Mazdoor%20Kisan%20Shakti%20Sangathan%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Story%20of%20MKSS.htmhttp://www.righttoinformation.org/http://www.co-intelligence.org/CIPol_publicparticipation.htmlhttp://www.mrsc.org/focuspub/hearings.aspxhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Public%20Hearing%20-%20Author%20-%20Nidhi%20Singh.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Public%20Hearing%20-%20Author%20-%20Nidhi%20Singh.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%9C%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%20%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B8%C3%A0%C2%A5%C2%81%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B5%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%BE%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%88)%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%9C%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%20%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B8%C3%A0%C2%A5%C2%81%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B5%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%BE%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%88)%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htmhttp://d/DOx/Research/imp/Jan%20Sunwai%20(%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%9C%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%20%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B8%C3%A0%C2%A5%C2%81%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%A8%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%B5%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%BE%C3%A0%C2%A4%C2%88)%20%C3%82%C2%BB%20Samarthan.htm7/31/2019 Nlu-d Research Paper
24/24
AUTHOR
Name - SHASHANK DUBEY
Student, IInd
Year (B.A LL.B)
Institute Of Law, Nirma University
Contact no. 08690806059
E-mail [email protected]
Address MIG-2-109,PHASE-2,VISHWAKARMA
NAGAR,BERASIAROAD,KAROND, BHOPAL(M.P)
CO-AUTHOR-
Name- NISHANT PAL
Student, IInd
Year (B.A LL.B)
Institute Of Law, Nirma University
Contact no. 08980522837
E-mail [email protected]
Address H.N 1404/50, Meethe kunye wali gali, Lohakhan, Ajmer.
mailto:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]:[email protected]