Transcript
Page 1: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

NIRS Research on Retirement Security

NAGDCA Industry Roundtable MeetingApril 24, 2014

Diane Oakley Executive Director

Page 2: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

What Do Americans Think About Retirement? Anxious

How concerned are you about current economic conditions affecting your ability to achieve a secure retirement?

2Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 3: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Disappearance of Pensions an Impediment to “American Dream”

To what extent do you agree/disagree that the disappearance of pensions has made it harder for workers to achieve the

“American Dream?”

3

Page 4: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

It’s Only Getting Harder to Prepare for Retirement

Do you feel that – compared to today – it will be easier or harder for Americans to prepare for retirement in the future, or will there be no

difference?

4Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 5: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

ON THE RIGHT TRACK?State Pension Reforms in the

Aftermath of the Financial Crisis

5

Page 6: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Why Private Employers Froze DB Pensions and Shifted to 401(k)s

• Onerous funding regulations on private pensions and FASB accounting rules caused funding volatility

• Changes in technology and industrial makeup of economy

• Shift from internal labor markets to flexible labor markets, insecure employment

• Corporate objective to maximize shareholder value

Page 7: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Many Private Sector Employers Remain Committed to DB Plans

• “Many employers remain committed to providing these plans as an important part of their compensation package.” (U.S. Chamber of Commerce: Retirement Benefits in the 21st Century)

• Three-fourths of active DB pensions report “DB plan aligns with our total rewards philosophy” (AonHewitt: “Global Pension Risk Survey 2011: US Survey Findings,” )

Page 8: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

ON THE RIGHT TRACK?Public Sector Difference• Commitment to stable employment relations and

internal labor markets.

• Greater ability to smooth out the effects of business cycles on funding requirements.

• Public interest mission: DB pensions help provide high quality public services in a cost effective manner, while also providing retirement security.

• Public employers have more in common with the largest private employers, who have maintained DBs.

Page 9: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Public Pension Reforms After 2008 Financial Crisis

• Vast majority have modified their existing pension plans. Most common:– increased Employee contributions; – reduced DB benefits for new hires, including

higher retirement age– Cost of Living Adjustment (COLA)

reductions for retirees and existing workers.

Page 10: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Aggressive Reforms In Virtually All States to Ensure Sustainability of Public Pensions

9

16

29

39

0 10 20 30 40 50

Employer contribution increase (statutory)

Reduced COLA for current members

Employee contribution increase

Reduced benefits for new hires

Number of States

Source: Author’s analysis of NCSL data. Changes affect some or all members of state-run plans in each state.

Types of Changes Enacted

10

Page 11: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Employee and

Employer

Contributions,

1982 to 2009

Public Pensions Typically Are Shared Funding Responsibility

Source: U.S. Census Bureau11

Page 12: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

After 2008 Financial Crisis: 48 States Make Pension Reforms

• No state has shifted to a DC-only plan since 2005.

• Four new mandatory hybrid arrangements with a DC component, most for new hires only.

• Three Cash Balance Plan for new hires • Only one state, Rhode Island, enacted a

“Hard Freeze” for current employees.

Page 13: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Most States Stay with DB; Some Switch to Hybrid

Types of Changes to New Hire Benefits

Four states enacted optional DC-only benefits for new hires.

Source: Author’s analysis of NCSL data. Changes affect some or all members of state-run plans in each state.

3

4

32

0 10 20 30 40

Mandatory CB (DB closed)

DB + DC hybrid

Adjust existing DB plan

Number of States

Page 14: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Higher Age and Service Requirements for New Members 2009–2012

14

4

4

Total: 32 States PR

Page 15: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Increases in Employee Contributions 2009–2012

15

Future Members Only (7 states)

At Least Some Current Members (23 states)PR

Page 16: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

16

People already retired and active employees (11 states)

Future hires only (7 states)

At least some active employees (6 states)Total: 24 States

Reductions in Post-Retirement Benefit Increases 2009–2012

PR

Page 17: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

2013 Public Pension Reforms Tennessee Hybrid

• Apply: State employees, teachers and Higher Ed hired after July1, 2014

• Reduced DB: new 1% multiplier ( 1.575%) and NRA 65 or rule of 90.

• Contributions:

– Employee: 5% for DB and 2% for DC

– Employer: 4% for DB and 4% for DC.

Page 18: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

2013 Public Pension Reforms Kentucky Cash Balance Plan

• Apply: State employees and County employees hired after July1, 2013

• Contributions (vest in 5 years) :

– Employee: 7.5% for hazardous & 4% for non

– Employer: 8% for hazardous & 5% for non

• Guaranteed Interest Credit: 4% annually with additional credits equal to 75% of return in excess.

Page 19: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Texas Teachers Retirement System Benefit Design Study

• $11.7 billion/49% increase in closed DB plan liability due to a more liquid asset allocation

• Cost comparison of multiple plan design options– DC most expensive– DB least expensive

19

Page 20: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Pension Benefit Design Study

20

.

Source: Teacher Retirement System of Texas and Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company

Page 21: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Pension Benefit Design Study

21

.

Source: Teacher Retirement System of Texas and Gabriel, Roeder, Smith & Company

Page 22: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

• Realistic simulations of probable worker outcomes in DC plan:

• Workers would have only a 50% chance of reaching 60% of the benefit provided by the DB plan, at the same cost.

Texas Teachers Retirement SystemBenefit Design Study

22

Page 23: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

2013 Public Pension Reforms Texas Teacher Retirement System

Contributions:

• Employee: 6.4% currently increases to 7.7% by 2017.

• State: from 6.4% to 6.8%

• Non-Social Security SD: contribute 1.5% of payroll.

3% COLA – Because actuarially sound, first retiree COLA since 2001.

Page 24: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Employees Under PEPRA, Estimated to Receive Less than CalPERS Classic

Source: The Emerging Role of Defined Contribution Plans for California Public Employees, CalPERS. April 2014

Page 25: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Additional Monthly Contribution Needed in DC Savings Plan for PEPRA Employees to Reach Classic CalPERS

Source: The Emerging Role of Defined Contribution Plans for California Public Employees, CalPERS. April 2014

Page 26: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

What Do Americans Think About Retirement? Anxious

How concerned are you about current economic conditions affecting your ability to achieve a secure retirement?

26Source: NIRS Pensions & Retirement Security 2013

Page 27: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

27

Social Security is Major Source of Income for 75 Percent of Retiree 65+

Source: NIRS Calculations for retirees who did not work from the March 2012 CPS extract from IPUMS

Bottom 25 Middle 50% Top 25% $-

$10,000

$20,000

$30,000

$40,000

$50,000

$60,000

Sources of Income of Retirees 65 and Older

OtherInterest, Dividends and RentRetirement IncomeSSI & DisabilitySocial Security

Page 28: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

45% of All Working-Age Households Have No Assets in Retirement Accounts

Household retirement account ownership by age of head of household, 2010

Source: Author’s analysis of 2010 SCF.

Page 29: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Retirement Accounts Are Concentrated Among Higher-Income Households

Retirement account ownership status by household income quartile, 2010

Source: NIRS analysis of 2010 SCF. Universe is households with heads age 25-64. Households with negative earnings excluded. Household income adjusted by marital status for ranking purposes.

Page 30: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Typical Working-Age Household Has $3,000 in Retirement Assets; Near-Retirement Household Has $12,000

Median retirement account balance, households with retirement accounts vs. all households, 2010

Source: NIRS analysis of 2010 SCF. Universe is households with heads age 25-64, with total earnings ≥ $5,000 and < $500,000 and total income < $1M.

Page 31: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

4 out of 5 Households Have Less than One Times Their Income in Retirement Savings

Retirement account balance as a percentage of income among working households, 2010

Source: NIRS analysis of 2010 SCF. Universe is households with heads age 25-64, with total earnings ≥ $5,000 and < $500,000 and total income < $1M.

Page 32: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Households of Color Are Less than Half as Likely As White Households to Have Retirement Savings at Least Annual Income

Source: NIRS analysis of 2010 SCF microdata. Universe is households with total earnings > $5,000 and < $500,000 and total income < $1M. Values may not add up to 100% due to rounding.

Page 33: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Retirement Benchmarks from Financial Firms: Accumulate 8-11 Times Income

• Fidelity: – retire @ 67– contribute over 42-year career– 15% contribution rate over most

of career, incl. employer match– 85% income replacement

• Aon Hewitt:– retire @ 65– contribute over 40-year career– 15% contribution rate , incl.

employer match– 85% income replacement

Source: Fidelity (2012) and Aon Hewitt (2012)

Page 34: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Retirement Savings Benchmarks: Large Majority of Working Households Fall Short

Share of working households that do not meet retirement savings targets for their age, by type of measure, 2010.

Source: Author's analysis of 2010 SCF based on retirement savings targets adapted from Fidelity (2012). Universe is households with heads age 25-64, with total earnings ≥ $5,000 and < $500,000 and total income < $1M. * "Total Retirement Assets" measure includes retirement account balances reported in SCF and DB pension assets imputed by author.

Page 35: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Distribution of Baby Boomer Retirement Wealth, 2010

35

Top 25% Top 10% Top 5%0%

10%

20%

30%

40%

50%

60%

70%

80%

90%

100%

83%

56%

37%

4%

96%

Bottom 50% of households by net wealth

Top 50% of households by net wealth

Percentage of Assets

Source: NIRS analysis of 2010 Survey of Consumer Finances. Retirement wealth includes assets health in retirement accounts, e.g., 401(k)s, IRAs, and KEOGH plans.

Page 36: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

90th Percentile Household Has Nearly 100 Times the Retirement Savings of Median Household

36Source: M.Morrisey and N. Sabadish. Retirement Inequality. Economic Policy Institute. September 2013

Page 37: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

DB Pension Benefits Are More Equally Distributed than DC Account Balances

37Source: M.Morrisey and N. Sabadish. Retirement Inequality. Economic Policy Institute. September 2013

DC Retirement Account Balances DB Pension income

Page 38: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

State Financial Security Scorecard• Scorecard evaluates relative

performance on aging population’s key economic dimensions – income, costs and work.

• States ranked from 1 (best) to 51 (worst) for each variable.

• Rankings converted into scores: 10 (best) to 1 (worst).

Page 39: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Scorecard Categories/Variables

Retirement Income Retiree Costs Labor Market • Private workplace

retirement plan participation

• Average defined contribution account balance

• Marginal tax rate on pension income

• Medicare out-of-pocket costs

• Medicaid generosity• Housing cost burden

• Unemployment rate for people aged 55 years old and older.

• Median hourly earnings (real) for people aged 55 years old and older

Page 40: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Washington: Data and Scores

Page 41: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Retirement Income Scores 2012

Page 42: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Retiree Cost Scores 2012

Page 43: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Labor Market Scores 2012

Page 44: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Overall Scores 2012

Page 45: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Proposals to Expand Retirement Security In Washington & In States

• My RA – announced in STOUS by President Obama.• Automatic IRA Act of 2013 – Introduced by Rep.

Richard Neal would require employers to offer payroll deposit IRAs and offers small employers a tax credit for costs associated with establishing an auto-IRA

• California Secure Choice Retirement Savings Trust, SB 1234 - opt-out, Auto-IRA concept with a 3% default employee contribution and professional investment management. Mandated study under way.

• Expand the Savers Credit - HR 837 (Rep. Neal)

Page 46: NIRS Research on Retirement Security

Diane Oakley202.457.8190

[email protected]

www.nirsonline.org

46


Recommended