Transcript

Critical reading exercisePlease email responses to the questions posed in class to [email protected] by Wed 5 March at 1200.Piece to read:Rethinking Our Rights to Dangerous BehaviorsFEB. 25, 2014In the last e! "ears, its #e$o%e in$reasingl" $lear that oo& $o%'anies engineerh"'er'ro$esse& oo&s in !a"s 're$isel"geare& to %osta''eal to our tastes. (histe$hnologi$all" a&van$e& engineering is &one, o $ourse, !ith the goal o%a)i%i*ing'roits, regar&lesso theee$tso theresultingoo&son$onsu%erhealth, natural resour$es, the environ%ent or an"thing else.Butthe issues go !a" #e"on& oo&, asthe+it",niversit" o -e! .ork'roessor-i$holas Freu&en#erg &is$usses in his ne! #ook, /Lethal but Legal: Corporations,Consumption, andProtectingPublicHealth.0Freu&en#ergs$aseisthat theoo&in&ustr" is #ut one e)a%'le o the threat to 'u#li$ health 'ose& #" !hat he $alls/the $or'orate $onsu%'tion $o%'le),0 an allian$e o $or'orations, #anks,%arketers an& others that essentiall" 'ro%ote an& #eneit ro% unhealth" liest"les.It soun&s $ree'"1 it is $ree'". But its also 'lain to see. .es, its unlikel" theres a$a#al that sits &o!nan& asks, /2o!$an!e kill %ore ki&s to%orro!30 ButFreu&en#erg&etails ho!si)in&ustries 4oo&aneverage, to#a$$o, al$ohol,irear%s, 'har%a$euti$al an& auto%otive 4 use 'rett" %u$h the sa%e 'la"#ook to&een& the sales o health5threatening'ro&u$ts.(his 'la"#ook, largel" &evelo'e" the to#a$$o in&ustr", &isregar&s hu%an health an& 'oses greater threats to oure)isten$e than an" $o%%uni$a#le &isease "ou $an na%e.6ll o thesein&ustries !orkhar&to&een&our /right0 4tos%oke, ee&our$hil&ren7unk, $arr"han&gunsan&soon4as%atterso $hoi$e, ree&o%an&res'onsi#ilit". (heir uniie& line is that an"thing that restri$ts those /rights0 is un56%eri$an..et ea$h in&ustr", as it 8%ostl"9 legall" $an, &esigns 'ro&u$ts that are &ii$ult toresist an& so%eti%es a&&i$tive. (his %a" #e o#vious, i onl" in retros'e$t: The foodindustryhascreatedcombinations that%osta''ealtoour#rains instin$tualan&learne&res'onses, although!e!ereeatingthoseoo&slong#eore!ereali*e&that. It %a" #e hi&&en 8an& #or&erline illegal9, as !hen to#a$$o $o%'anies uppedthe nicotine quotient of tobacco. ;o%eti%es, as Freu&en#erg 'oints out, the a''eals%a" #e su#tle: uite si%ilar. For e)a%'le, the argu%ent or 'rote$ting 'eo'leagainst %arketers o 7unk oo& relies in 'art on the a$t that antis%okingregulations an& seat#elt la!s !ere initiall" atta$ke& as ro##ing us o $hoi$e1 no! !ekno! the"re liesavers.(husthe%ostnovel an&interesting'artsoFreu&en#ergs#ookarethosethatre'hrase the &is$ussion o rights an& $hoi$e, #e$ause !e nee& %ore than seat#eltan&antis%okingla!s, %orethanae!'oli$ies nu&ging'eo'leto!aretterhealth. ,ntil no! 8an&, sa&l", 'erha's !ell into the uture9, $or'orations have #een#oth%ore ni%#le an&%ore lush!ith$ashthanthe 'u#li$ healthar%s ogovern%ent. /?hat !e nee&,0 Freu&en#erg sai& to %e, /is to return to the 'u#li$se$tor the right to set health 'oli$" an& to li%it $or'orations ree&o% to 'roit atthe e)'ense o 'u#li$ health.0Re&eining the argu%ent %a" hel' us in& strategies that $an a$tuall" #ring a#out$hange. (he turning 'oint in the to#a$$o !ars !as !hen the >uestion $hange& ro%the in&ustr"s 4 /Do 'eo'le have the right to s%oke30 4 to that o 'u#li$ health:/Do'eo'lehavetheright to#reathe$leanair30 -otethat #oth>uestions arelegiti%ate, #ut i "oua&&resstheirst 8to!hi$htheans!eriso $ourse/"es09!ithout asking the se$on& 8to !hi$h the ans!er is o $ourse also /"es09 "ou %iss ano''ortunit" to $onvert the ans!er ro% one that lea&s to greater in&ustr" 'roits toone that has literall" $ut s%oking rates in hal.;i%ilarl", !enee&to#easkingnot/Do7unkoo&$o%'anieshavetheright to%arket to $hil&ren30 #ut /Do $hil&ren have the right to a health" &iet30 8In @e)i$o,the se$on& >uestion has #een ans!ere& 'ositivel". ;ha%eull", !e have "et to takethat ste'.9 (he >uestion is not onl", /Do !e have a right to #ear ar%s30 #ut also /Do!e have the right to #e sae in our streets an& s$hools30 In short, sa"s Freu&en#erg:/(he right to #e health" tru%'s the right o $or'orations to 'ro%ote $hoi$es thatlea&to're%ature&eathan&'reventa#leillnesses. Arote$ting'u#li$healthisaun&a%ental govern%ent res'onsi#ilit"1 a&e$ent so$iet"shoul&not allo!oo&$o%'anies to $onvin$e $hil&ren to #u" oo& thats #a& or the% or to en$ourage alieti%e o unhealth" eating.0O&&l", these are ra&i$al notions. But arent the" less /un56%eri$an0 than allo!ing a$o%'an"to%a)i%i*eitsreturnoninvest%ent#"lookingtosell to$hil&renorhealth" a&ults in !a"s that !ill $ause 're%ature %ortalit"3 6s Freu&en#erg sa"s,/;houl&nts$ien$ean&te$hnolog"#euse&toi%'rovehu%an!ell5#eing, nottoa&van$e #usiness goals that har%health30 (!o other >uestions that $an #eans!ere& /"es.0QuestionDiscuss at least two areas of potential bias by the author of thisOp-Ed piece in the NY Times.