NEW VIRTUA VOORHEES HOSPITAL
Voorhees, NJ
Paul StewartStructural OptionSenior Thesis Presentation 2010The Pennsylvania State University
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
•Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal• Design of Helipad• Redesign of Lateral System• Breadth Study• Conclusion
BUILDING LOCATION
Virtua Hospital
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
•Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal• Design of Helipad• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
BUILDING DATA
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction•Existing Structural SystemGravity System
• Proposal• Design of Helipad• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
EXISTING STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction•Existing Structural SystemGravity System
• Proposal• Design of Helipad• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
EXISTING STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
Foundations - Geopiers
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction•Existing Structural SystemLateral System
• Proposal• Design of Helipad• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
EXISTING STRUCTURAL SYSTEM
Moment Frames Braced Frames
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System•Proposal• Design of Helipad• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
RELOCATION OF HELIPAD
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System•Proposal• Design of Helipad• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
REDESIGN OF LATERAL SYSTEM
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal•Design of HelipadHelipad Location
• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
HELIPAD REQUIREMENTS
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal•Design of HelipadHelipad Location
• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
LOCATION OF HELIPAD
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal•Design of HelipadHelipad Design
• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE HELIPAD SLAB DESIGN
Reinforcement In Slab SectionsSection A Section B Section C Section D
Column Strip (4) #5 (8) #5 (6) #5 (11) #5Middle Strip (4) #5 (4) #5 (6) #5 (6) #5Flexural Beam
(4) #8 (9) #8 (3) #8 (5) #8
Shear Beam N/A (2) #4 @ 8” N/A (2) #4 @8”
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal•Design of Helipad
Helipad Design• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
HELIPAD SLAB DESIGN
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal•Design of HelipadHelipad Design
• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
GRAVITY COLUMN REDESIGN
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal•Design of HelipadHelipad Design
• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
GRAVITY COLUMN REDESIGN
TRANSFER GIRDER
NEW COLUMN
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal•Design of HelipadHelipad Design
• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
GRAVITY COLUMN REDESIGN
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal•Design of HelipadHelipad Design
• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
GRAVITY COLUMN REDESIGN
COLUMN SIZESLocation Level Old Size New Size
Corner ColumnsPerimeter Columns
7 – Roof W14x61 W14x68
5 – 7 W14x74 W14x90
4 – 5 W14x74 W14x90
2 – 4 W14x74 W14x90
Ground – 2 W14x90 W14x109
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal•Design of HelipadHelipad Design
• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
GRAVITY COLUMN REDESIGN
COLUMN SIZESLocation Level Old Size New Size
Center Columns 7 – Roof W14x61 W14x109
5 – 7 W14x90 W14x145
4 – 5 N/A W14x145
2 – 4 N/A W14x176
Ground – 2 N/A W14x233
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal•Design of HelipadHelipad Design
• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
GRAVITY COLUMN REDESIGN
COLUMN SIZESLocation Level Old Size New Size
End Column 7 – Roof W14x61 W14x90
5 – 7 W14x90 W14x132
4 – 5 N/A W14x132
2 – 4 N/A W14x145
Ground – 2 N/A W14x193
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal• Design of Helipad•Breadth StudyAcoustical
• Redesign of Lateral System• Conclusion
ACOUSTICAL
dB’s Recorded in Patient’s RoomType of Material dB’s in Room¼” Glass 47.3¼” Laminated Glass and 3/16” Glass with a 2” Airspace
34.3
¼” Laminated Glass and 3/16” Glass with a 4” Airspace
30.3
(2) ¼” Laminated Glass with ½” Airspace 38.3
Example Sound LevelsType of Sounds dB’sHelicopter 105Average Office Noise 50Quiet Conversation 40Quiet Office 30Quiet Living Room 20
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal• Design of Helipad• Breadth Study•Redesign of Lateral SystemLateral Loads
• Conclusion
LATERAL LOADS
SEISMIC DESIGN CRITERIASite Class D
Seismic Design Category
C
Occupancy Category
IV
Type of Lateral System
Ordinary Steel Concentrically Braced Frames
LATERAL BASE SHEARSNorth – South
DirectionEast – West Direction
Old Seismic Loads
1539.6 kips 1319.8 kips
New Seismic Loads
1314.1 kips 1314.1 kips
Wind Loads 1357.9 kips 1376.8 kipsControlling Load
Wind Wind
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal• Design of Helipad• Breadth Study•Redesign of Lateral SystemRAM Model
• Conclusion
RAM MODEL
Applied Lateral Load Cases:• Seismic• Wind Case 1 – 4
Applied Load Combinations:• 1.4D• 1.2D + 1.6L + .5(Lr or S)• 1.2D + 1.6(Lr or S) + (L or 0.8W)• 1.2D + 1.6W + L + 0.5(Lr or S)• 1.2D + 1.0E + L + 0.2S• 0.9D + 1.6W • 0.9D + 1.0E
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal• Design of Helipad• Breadth Study•Redesign of Lateral SystemBraced Frame Design
• Conclusion
LOCATION OF BRACES
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal• Design of Helipad• Breadth Study•Redesign of Lateral SystemBraced Frame Design
• Conclusion
TYPICAL BRACES
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal• Design of Helipad• Breadth Study•Redesign of Lateral SystemBraced Frame Design
• Conclusion
INTERACTION WITH THE ARCHITECTURE
• Braces do not interfere with rooms or hallways
• Braces are visible at the interior courtyards
Δ
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal• Design of Helipad• Breadth Study•Redesign of Lateral SystemLateral Calculations
• Conclusion
DRIFT
Max Wind Drift Max Seismic DriftΔ North – South:
Δ = 2.33”
H/400 = 4.2”
East – West: Δ = 1.31”
H/400 = 4.2”
Δ Δ North – South: Δ = 2.93”
0.010*H = 16.8”
East – West: Δ = 4.16”
0.010*H = 16.8”
Δ = Cd * δ I
ExistingNorth – South:
Δ = 0.83”
ExistingEast – West:
Δ = 0.13”
ExistingNorth – South:
Δ = 0.25”
ExistingEast – West:
Δ = 0.35”
Δ = Cd * δ I
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal• Design of Helipad• Breadth Study•Redesign of Lateral SystemLateral Calculations
• Conclusion
CENTER OF MASS/RIGIDITY
Differences in Center of Mass and Center of Rigidity
Level Existing N-S New N-S Existing E-W New E-W9 10.4’ 27’ 3.1’ 2.2’8 4.3 68.6’ 0.6’ 1.6’7 20.6’ 3.9’ 0.5’ 1.6’6 4.6’ 20.6’ 0.2’ 2.2’5 60.0’ 7.9’ 18.8’ 15.0’4 51.3’ 11.1’ 25.9’ 22.8’3 21.2’ 2.3’ 23.7’ 28.1’2 25’ 1.5’ 14.9’ 25.4’1 1.2’ 11.3’ 30.0’ 47.8’
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal• Design of Helipad• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System•Conclusion
CONCLUSIONS
• Helipad will be located in Zone 5• The Pad will be designed as a two – way slab• New columns will be introduced along column line
Ma• The façade of the building will be changed• Lateral system will eliminate of moment frames
• Braced frames will not interfere with the architecture
• Drift values will be larger, but still acceptable• Differences in COM and COR are generally the
same
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal• Design of Helipad• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System•Conclusion
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
Thank you to the following people for their help throughout the year:
• Virtua Health• Turner Company• Penn State Architectural Engineering Faculty and Students• Family and Friends
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE
• Introduction• Existing Structural System• Proposal• Design of Helipad• Breadth Study• Redesign of Lateral System•Conclusion
QUESTIONS? COMMENTS?
Questions?
Paul Stewart 4/12/2010Structural Option
PRESENTATION OUTLINE FOUNDATION REDESIGN