Molecular evidence of insecticide
resistance in Helicoverpa armigera
and expression profiles of genes
involved in metabolic resistance
Akhtar Rasool
Submitted in partial fulfilment of
requirement for the degree
Doctor of Philosophy
2015
Department of Biotechnology (NIBGE)
Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences
Nilore-45650 Islamabad, Pakistan
National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering
P. O. BOX 577, JHANG ROAD, FAISALABAD.
(Affiliated with PIEAS, Islamabad)
Declaration of Originality
I hereby declare that the work accomplished in this thesis is the result of my own
research carried out in Agriculture Biotechnology Division, National Institute for
Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), Faisalabad, Pakistan and
Department of Entomology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena
Germany. This thesis has not been published previously nor does it contain any
material from the published resources that can be considered as the violation of
international copyright law.
Furthermore I also declare that I am aware of the terms “copyright and plagiarism”,
and if any copyright violation is found out in this work I will be held responsible of
the consequences of any such violation.
Signature: _______________
Name of the Student: AKHTAR RASOOL
Registration No. 10-7-1-001-2008
Date:__24.03.2015__
Place: NIBGE, Faisalabad
Dedicated
to
My Beloved Parents
I
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
A major research project like this is never the work of anyone alone. The
contributions of many different people in their different ways, have made this
possible. I would like to extend my appreciation especially to the following.
Foremost, I would like to express my sincere gratitude to my advisor Dr.
Muhammad Ashfaq for the continuous support during my Ph.D study and research,
for his patience, motivation, enthusiasm, and providing me with immense knowledge.
I could not have imagined having a better advisor and mentor for my Ph.D study.
I wish to express my deep sense of gratitude for my foreign supervisor and co-
supervisor professor Dr. David G Heckel who made a great contribution for the
successful completion of my research during my stay at Department of Entomology,
Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology (MPI-ICE), Jena Germany . His skilful
advice and learned guidance enabled me to complete this work. I learned a lot from
him as he proved a very expert and capable teacher for me. My special and heartily
thanks to Dr Nicole Joussen (MPI-ICE) for providing her valuable guidance, ideas
and her expertise to make this research possible. Her support, guidance, advices
throughout the research project as well as her pain-staking effort in proof reading the
manuscripts is greatly appreciated.
I offer my special thanks to Dr. Shahid Mansoor, Director NIBGE, and Ex-directors
Dr. Zafar Mehmood Khalid and Dr. Sohail Hameed for providing the best possible
working environment at NIBGE. I also gratefully acknowledge Dr. Zahid Mukhtar,
Head Agricultural Biotechnology Division, NIBGE and Dr. Qaisar M Khan, Head
Soil and Environmental Biotechnology Division, NIBGE for their moral support
throughout my research work. I am profoundly indebted to Dr. Muhammad Asif
Qadri (PS), Agricultural Biotechnology Division, NIBGE, for his positive, sincere
and valuable guidelines and support. I am also thankful to Dr. M Sajjad Mirza
(DCS), Soil and Environmental Biotechnology Division, NIBGE, for his support
when I moved to his group.
I would like to pay my sincere gratitude to MPI-ICE entomology department
colleagues Dr. Yannick Pauchet, Dr. Heiko Vogel, Dr. Dr. Melanie Unbehend,
Anne Karpinski, and Susanne Donnerhacke, Domenica Schnabelrauch and all
other lab fellows who made my stay comfortable and successful at Jena. My special
thanks go to Mr. Sher Afzal Khan (MPI-ICE) for his help and suggestions during
my short stay at Jena. His hospitality and affection is memorable.
I am highly obliged to my lab colleagues at NIBGE; Dr. Arif M Khan, Imran Rauf,
Ali Raza Noor, Mr. Tayyab Naseem, Mrs. Mariam Masood, Dr. Innam Ullah,
Ms. Romana Iftikhar, Mr. Qamar Abbas, Miss Shamim Akhtar, Mrs. Saidia
Awais, Mr. Imran Ali, Mr. Shah Sawar for their cooperation and help in
experimental work.
I have no words that can suffice the role of my friends and colleagues especially, Dr.
Muhammd Tariq, Mr. Iftikhar Ali, Mr. Kashif Aslam, Dr. Muhammad Ikram
II
Anwar, Rahim Ullah, Dr. Ishtiaq Hassan, in the accomplishment of this task. Also,
I can not forget to mention the names of my friends in the Hujra for their ever
available help and sincere cooperation.
Special gratitude is due to Higher Education Commission of Pakistan for providing
financial support under Indigenous Scholarship program and International Research
Support Initiative program and Max Planck Society, Germany for granting me
“Award of doctoral students” for my studies and making my dreams come true. I offer
my special appreciation to National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic
Engineering (NIBGE) and Pakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Sciences
(PIEAS) for good academic procedures and research facilities.
Last but not the least special thanks from core of my heart to my brothers, sisters and
my finance Dr. Hina Jabeen for their undying love, support, precious affections,
prayers and their valuable encouragement enabled me to complete this task
successfully.
Akhtar Rasool
Table of contents
III
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Contents Page No.
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS............................................................................................... I
TABLE OF CONTENTS ......................................................................................... III
LIST OF TABLES .................................................................................................... IX
LIST OF FIGURES .................................................................................................... X
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS .................................................................................XII
Abstract ................................................................................................................... XVI
Chapter 1 ......................................................................................................................1
General introduction and review of literature ..........................................................1
1.1. Helicoverpa armigera.................................................................................. 1
1.1.1. Occurrence and biology ...........................................................................2
1.2. Global economic importance ....................................................................... 3
1.3. Control methods .......................................................................................... 6
1.3.1. Chemical control ......................................................................................6
1.3.2. Biological control.....................................................................................8
1.4. Insecticide resistance ................................................................................... 9
1.5. Mechanisms of insecticide resistance ........................................................ 10
1.5.1. Behavioural resistance ...........................................................................10
1.5.2. Cuticular penetration resistance .............................................................10
1.5.3. Target site insensitivity ..........................................................................11
1.5.4. Metabolic resistance...............................................................................11
1.6. Genomics of insecticide resistance ............................................................ 15
1.7. Genome mapping ....................................................................................... 15
1.7.1. Genetic mapping ....................................................................................16
1.8. DNA markers to evaluate genetic diversity ............................................... 17
Table of contents
IV
1.8.1. Microsatellites ........................................................................................17
1.8.2. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) .............................................17
1.8.3. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs) ...........................18
1.8.4. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) .................................19
1.8.5. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) ...............................20
1.8.6. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) markers.................................................21
1.9. Research objective ..................................................................................... 22
Chapter 2 ....................................................................................................................23
General materials and methods ................................................................................23
2.1. Insect collection ......................................................................................... 23
2.2. Helicoverpa armigera diets and rearing .................................................... 23
2.3. Chemical insecticide and toxicity test ....................................................... 23
2.4. Genomic DNA extraction .......................................................................... 24
2.5. RNA extraction .......................................................................................... 25
2.6. RNA purification ....................................................................................... 25
a. DNase treatment ................................................................................................... 25
b. Purification ........................................................................................................... 25
2.7. Quantitation of DNA/RNA ........................................................................ 26
2.8. cDNA synthesis ......................................................................................... 26
2.9. PCR amplification ..................................................................................... 26
2.10. Gel extraction and purification of PCR product ........................................ 27
2.11. Ligation ...................................................................................................... 27
2.12. Cloning and transformation ....................................................................... 27
2.13. Plasmid isolation........................................................................................ 28
2.14. Digestion of plasmid DNA ........................................................................ 29
2.15. Agarose gel electrophoresis ....................................................................... 29
Table of contents
V
2.16. Stocks preparation of cell cultures ............................................................. 29
2.17. Sequencing................................................................................................. 29
Chapter 3 ....................................................................................................................31
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of
cypermethrin resistance gene in Helicoverpa armigera ..........................................31
3.1. Introduction ............................................................................................... 31
3.2. Materials and Methods .............................................................................. 35
3.2.1. H. armigera strains and genetic crosses ................................................35
3.2.2. Toxicological tests .................................................................................35
3.2.3. Nucleic acid isolation .............................................................................36
3.2.4. AFLP linkage mapping ..........................................................................37
3.2.4.1. Restriction digestion .......................................................................37
3.2.4.2. Adaptor ligation ..............................................................................37
3.2.4.3. Pre-amplification ............................................................................38
3.2.4.4. Selective amplification ...................................................................38
3.2.4.5. Gel separation .................................................................................38
3.2.4.6. AFLP markers scoring on gel .........................................................39
3.2.4.7. Inference of resistant genotypes through PCR ...............................39
3.2.4.8. Exon primed intron crossing PCR (EPIC-PCR) .............................39
3.2.4.9. Data analysis ...................................................................................40
3.2.5. Isolation, cloning, overexpression and characterization of
CYP337B3 gene .....................................................................................42
3.2.5.1. DNA and RNA extraction ..............................................................42
3.2.5.2. PCR amplification, cloning and sequencing CYP337B3
gene fragment .................................................................................42
3.2.5.3. Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) PCR .........................42
3.2.5.4. Cloning and sequencing of RACE PCR products ..........................43
3.2.5.5. CYP337B3 cloning and characterisation of the intron ....................43
Table of contents
VI
3.2.5.6. Insect cell culture (Ha2302)............................................................44
3.2.5.7. Heterologous expression of CYP337B3 gene in Ha2302
Cells ................................................................................................44
3.2.5.8. Microsomal and cytosolic fractions isolation from
Ha2302 Cells ..................................................................................47
3.2.5.9. Determination of protein content ....................................................47
3.2.5.10. DNA extraction from Ha2302 cells and screening by
PCR .................................................................................................48
3.2.5.11. Stocks preparation of Ha2302 cells containing
CYP337B3 gene ..............................................................................48
3.2.5.12. SDS-PAGE and western-blot .........................................................48
3.2.5.13. Activity assays with P450 model substrates ...................................49
3.2.5.14. In vitro metabolism assays with cypermethrin and
analysis through HPLC ...................................................................50
3.3. Results ....................................................................................................... 52
3.3.1. Cypermethrin resistance in the FSD strain is metabolic and
semidominant .........................................................................................52
3.3.2. AFLP marker-discovery characteristics .................................................55
3.3.3. Mapping of resistant gene (CYP337B3) within linkage group
13............................................................................................................58
3.3.4. Full length gene isolation of CYP337B3 gene from FSD
strain .......................................................................................................61
3.3.5. Metabolic capabilities of CYP337B3 enzyme .......................................64
3.4. Discussion .................................................................................................. 67
Chapter 4 ....................................................................................................................71
Expression profiling of Helicoverpa armigera cytochrome p450
monooxygenases genes and their role in insecticides resistance ............................71
4.1. Introduction ............................................................................................... 71
4.2. Material and Methods ................................................................................ 74
4.2.1. H. armigera strains used in quantitative real-time PCR
(qRT-PCR) .............................................................................................74
Table of contents
VII
4.2.2. RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis ....................................................74
4.2.3. Primer designing ....................................................................................74
4.2.4. Quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR) ................................................74
4.2.5. Genomic DNA and RNA extraction from untreated
backcross larvae for CYP337B3 gene screening ....................................75
4.3. Results ....................................................................................................... 78
4.3.1. P450 genes in H. armigera ....................................................................78
4.3.2. Expression analysis of P450 Genes .......................................................78
4.3.2.1. Expression analysis of P450 genes in H. armigera
resistant strains................................................................................78
4.3.3. Expression pattern of FSD strain up-regulated genes
(CYP340G1, CYP340H1 and CYP341B2) in F1 backcross
progeny ..................................................................................................79
4.4. Discussion .................................................................................................. 84
Chapter 5 ....................................................................................................................87
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistance gene
CYP337B3 in Helicoverpa armigera in pakistan ......................................................87
5.1. Introduction ............................................................................................... 87
5.2. Materials and Methods .............................................................................. 90
5.2.1. Specimen sampling ................................................................................90
5.2.2. DNA barcoding ......................................................................................90
5.2.3. Data analysis ..........................................................................................90
5.2.4. Screening of CYP337B1, CYP337B2 and CYP337B3 genes .................91
5.3. Results ....................................................................................................... 92
5.3.1. Genetic diversity of H. armigera ...........................................................93
5.3.1.1. DNA barcoding ...............................................................................93
5.3.2. Population structure ...............................................................................97
5.3.3. Geographical distribution of H. armigera pyrethroids
resistant (CYP337B3) and susceptible genes (CYP337B1 and
CYP337B2) in Pakistan ..........................................................................99
Table of contents
VIII
5.4. Discussion ................................................................................................ 102
Chapter 6 ..................................................................................................................105
General Discussion ...................................................................................................105
Recommendations/ Future Work ........................................................................... 111
Chapter 7 ..................................................................................................................112
References .................................................................................................................112
Publications ..............................................................................................................137
List of Tables
IX
LIST OF TABLES
Table Page No.
Table 1.1 Geographical distribution of Helicoverpa armigera 4
Table 2.1 Helicoverpa armigera collected from different geographical regions
of the world. 30
Table 3.1
Primers for screening of CYP337B1, CYP337B2, CYP337B3, for
detection of CYP337B3 in the AFLP analysis, for cloning of
CYP337B3 and the intron region and for the ribosomal protein
genes
41
Table 3.2
Determination of cypermethrin toxicity (LD50, resistance factor
(RF), and synergistic factor (SF) with and without PBO) in 3rd
instar
larvae of Helicoverpa armigera strains through topical application
methods
54
Table 3.3 Primers combination used for MIBC and FIBC and number of
informative AFLP fragments scored per primer combination. 56
Table 3.4
Sequence identity of CYP337B3 gene of Helicoverpa armigera FSD
strain with already reported CYP337B through basic local alignment
search tool (BLAST) search.
62
Table 3.5
Activity of CYP337B3 containing microsomes toward different
model substrates of P450 enzymes. Corrected metabolic activities
were expressed as pmol product per mg of microsomal protein per
min.
65
Table 4.1 List of primer pairs used for RT-qPCR and the expression analysis 76
Table 4.2 P450 mRNA expression levels in three strains of Helicoverpa
armigera as determined by RT-qPCR. 82
Table 5.1
Comparisons between geographic regions (Northern Pakistan,
Central Pakistan and East Southern Pakistan) by AMOVA using
COI gene sequences of Helicoverpa armigera.
95
Table 5.2 Distribution of CYP337B1, CYP337B2 and CYP337B3 genes across
Pakistan 100
List of Figures
X
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure Page No.
Figure 1.1 Helicoverpa armigera 5
Figure 3.1
pIB/V5-His-TOPO® expression vector, used for cloning of
CYP337B3 gene isolated from Helicoverpa armigera strain FSD
and transformation into insect cell line Ha2302.
46
Figure 3.2
Dose-response curves of the resistant FSD strain of Pakistani
Helicoverpa armigera compared to the resistant TWBR line and
the susceptible TWBS line from Australia towards cypermethrin.
53
Figure 3.3 AFLP banding pattern and presence of CYP337B3 associated with
resistance. 57
Figure 3.4 Map of resistance-associated linkage group of Helicoverpa
armigera. 60
Figure 3.5 Alignment amino acid sequences of CYP337B3 isolated from of
Helicoverpa armigera FSD strain and TWB strain (Australian). 62
Figure 3.6 Confirmation of cloning and heterologous expression of
CYP337B3 in insect cell line Ha2302. 63
Figure 3.7 In vitro metabolism of cypermethrin by heterologously expressed
CYP337B3. 66
Figure 4.1 Maximum-likelihood tree of 63 P450 proteins from Helicoverpa
armigera. 80
Figure 4.2
mRNA abundance of 3 P450 genes in backcross larvae (BC)
possessing the resistance gene CYP337B3 or lacking CYP337B3
compared to the resistant FSD strain and TWBS line.
81
Figure 5.1 Map of Pakistan showing collection localities of Helicoverpa
armigera. 92
Figure 5.2 Distance analysis; Pairwise distance divergence (%) of
Helicoverpa armigera from Pakistan as generated by ABGD 96
List of Figures
XI
Figure 5.3 HapStar profile of COI gene haplotypes tree of Helicoverpa
armigera from Pakistan. 96
Figure 5.4 STRUCTURE analysis results of Helicoverpa armigera
populations collected from Pakistan based on SNPs. 98
Figure 5.5 PCR screening for the presence or absence of CYP337B1,
CYP337B2 and CYP337B3 in collected samples. 101
Figure 6.1
Alignment of CYP337B3v1 from Australian and CYP337B3 from
Pakistani Helicoverpa armigera with the CYP337B1 alleles and
CYP337B2.
110
Abbreviations
XII
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS
A Adenine
AFLP Amplified fragment length polymorphism
Amp Ampicillin
AChE Acetylcholinesterase
AMOVA Analysis of molecular variance
ANOVA Analysis of variance
°C Degree celsius
% Percent
µg Micrograms
µL Microlitre
µM Micromolar
ng Nanogram
Bt Bacillus thuringiensis
BIO Biodiversity institute of Ontario
BLAST Basic local alignment search tool
bp Base pair
BOLD Barcode of life data system
BSA Bovine serum albumin
C Cytosine
CABI Centre for agricultural bioscience international
CCDB Canadian centre for DNA barcoding
cDNA Complementary DNA sequence
cm Centimeter
CNS Central nervous system
COI Cytochrome oxidase subunit I
COII Cytochrome oxidase subunit II
CYP Cytochrome P450 monooxygenases
CytB Cytochrome B
dATP Deoxyadenosine triphosphate
dCTP Deoxycytidine triphosphate
dGTP Deoxyguanosine triphosphate
DEPC Diethylpyrocarbonate
Abbreviations
XIII
DMSO Dimethyl sulfoxide
DNA Deoxyribonucleic acid
dNTP Deoxyribonucleotide triphosphate
dUTP Deoxyuridine triphosphate
DDT Dichlorodiphenyl trichloroethane
DTT Dithiothreitol
dTTP Deoxythymidine triphosphate
EB Elution buffer
EDTA Ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
EMBL European molecular biology laboratory
EPIC-PCR Exon primed intron crossing-polymerase chain reaction
EPPO European and mediterranean plant protection organization
EST Expressed sequence tag
EtBr Ethidium bromide
FIBC Female informative backcross
g Gram
G Guanine
GABA Gamma-aminobutyric acid
GMO Genetically modified organism
GST Glutathione S-transferase
HCl Hydrochloric acid
IPTG Isopropyl β-D-1-thiogalactopyranoside
IRs Inverted repeats
IRAC Insecticide resistance action committee
kDa Kilo dalton
Kdr Knockdown resistance
Kg Kilogarm
LB Lura bertani
LD50 Lethal dose, 50%
LSD Least significant difference
M Molar
MCMC Markov chain monte carlo
MIBC Male informative backcross
Mg Milligrams
Abbreviations
XIV
MgCl2 Magnesium chloride
min Minutes
ml Millilitres
mM Millimolar
mm Millimeter
mRNA Messenger RNA
mtDNA Mitochondrial DNA
NaCl Sodium chloride
NADH Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide
NADPH Nicotinamide adenine dinucleotide phosphate
NCBI National center for biotechnology information
NPV Nuclear polyhedrosis virus
nt Nucleotide
PBO Piperonyl butoxide
PAGE Polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis
PCR Polymerase chain reaction
pM Picomole
QTL Quantitative trait loci
qRT-PCR Quantitative reverse transcription PCR
RACE-PCR Rapid amplification of cDNA ends PCR
RAPD Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA
RFLP Restriction fragment length polymorphism
RH Relative humidity
RNA Ribonucleic acid
rpm Resolution per minute
rRNA Ribosomal RNA
RT Reverse transcription
SD` Standard deviation
SDS Sodium dodecyl sulfate
Sec Second
SNPs Single nucleotide polymorphisms
SSR Simple sequence repeats
STR Short tandem repeats
T Thymine
Abbreviations
XV
TAE Tris acetate ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
TE Tris ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid
Tm Melting temperature
U Units
US$ United states dollar
UV Ultra violet
V Volts
VNTR Variable number tandem repeats
Abstract
XVI
Abstract
Cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) is a polyphagous pest which
has been reported from a wide array of plants and has cosmopolitan distribution across
Asia, Australia, Africa, Europe and South America. It is one of the most widespread
pest species of economically important crops. To prevent the damage caused by H.
armigera, a variety of methods are being used, including the use of chemical and
biological pesticides. Chemical pesticides are the first choice for H. armigera control
and 30% of all the pesticides worldwide are used against this pest. The insecticides
used for its control include organophosphates, carbamates and pyrethroids but
extensive and unattended use of chemical pesticides has resulted in high levels of
resistance in H. armigera. In Pakistan, H. armigera has developed high level of
resistance against pyrethroid insecticides mainly cypermethrin but the resistance
mechanism and the underlying genes have remained unidentified. The current study
was designed to identify and investigate the novel genes and mechanisms involved in
metabolic insecticide resistance in H. armigera with particular focus on a pyrethroid
(cypermethrin) and to find the genes regulating the over-expression of cytochrome
P450 in the resistant insects.
Helicoverpa armigera were collected from cotton/chickpea fields in Faisalabad
(FSD), Pakistan and tested for resistance against cypermethrin. It was revealed that
FSD has evolved 6.9-fold resistance compared to Australian cypermethrin susceptible
strain TWBS (Toowoomba). To determine the resistance mechanism of the FSD
strain, larvae were treated with piperonyl butoxide (PBO), a known P450 and
carboxylesterase inhibitor, prior to cypermethrin treatment and the observed
cypermethrin resistance was a metabolic resistance. To find out the genes involved in
metabolic resistance, amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) was used. The
AFLP based linkage map of FSD strain revealed that a single linkage group consisting
of 13 AFLPs showed a strong correlation with resistance, indicating the involvement
of a single gene. Thus a previously reported metabolic resistance gene CYP337B3 was
considered as a possible candidate gene for cypermethrin resistance in FSD strain and
it was further confirmed by PCR analysis which showed the presence of CYP337B3
gene in toxicity bioassays survived larvae and absence in killed larvae. Survivorship of
Abstract
XVII
the cypermethrin toxicity bioassay was most strongly correlated with the CYP337B3
genotype. To evaluate the metabolic capability of CYP337B3 gene to catabolise
cypermethrin, CYP337B3 was isolated from FSD strain, ligated in heterologous
expression vector and transformed into insect cell line (HA2302). It was found that
heterologous CYP337B3 enzyme is able to degrade cypermethrin in in vitro assays
using high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC).
To evaluate the possible role of other P450 genes in the cypermethrin
resistance of the FSD strain, the expression patterns of 59 P450 genes were analysed
in FSD strain, Australian fenvalerate resistant TWBR strain and susceptible strain
(TWBS) using quantitative PCR (qPCR). There was a higher expression (>5-fold) of
three genes (CYP340G1, CYP340H1 and CYP341B2) in FSD. Expression levels all
P450 genes in TWBR were similar to TWBS only with the exception of CYP321B1
significant down-regulation. Moreover, expression profile of these genes was also
examined in backcross progeny possessing CYP337B3 to study whether the
upregulated P450 genes (CYP340G1, CYP340H1 and CYP341B2) in FSD were
genetically linked to the cypermethrin resistance. However, it was revealed that these
genes were not overexpressed in backcross progeny.
Genetic diversity and presence or absence of resistance, in different
populations of H. armigera from Pakistan, were determined by using DNA barcoding
(COI gene) and CYP337B genes family, respectively. It was found that pyrethroid
resistance gene, CYP337B3 was present in all the populations (Northern, Central, East-
Southern) from Pakistan. Moreover, no significant population structure of H. armigera
was observed in Pakistan, indicating that this migratory pest is not restricted to
specific geographic region.
The study concludes that H. armigera in Pakistan has evolved CYP337B3 mediated
metabolic resistance against pyrethroids and CYP337B3 evolved twice independently
by unequal crossing-over between CYP337B2 and two different CYP337B1 alleles.
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
1
Chapter 1
General introduction and review of literature
The planet Earth is home to an astonishing diversity of animal and plant
species. The currently known 1.2 million (M) species are likely to be a small fraction
of the true total (3 to 100 M) estimated by the biologists (Mora et al., 2011). Class
Insecta, which represents the most dominant form of life on earth; contains of 75% of
all the recorded animal species in almost all ecosystems (ocean, deserts and Antarctic)
(Ikawa et al., 2002). This extraordinary ability of ecological adaptation gives insects
better chance of living in diverse environments. The vast diversity in their population,
body structure and size, adaptive abilities in feeding behaviour and mating approaches
are responsible for their survival and fitness in the environment (Behura, 2006).
Diversity of insects contributes to make them beneficial for environment (pollinate
crops, act as natural enemies of damaging pests and produce useful products such as
honey, wax and silk) (Hill, 1997a). However, insects also act as major pests and
vectors of different diseases of economically important crops (Hill, 1997b). One of the
inborn ability of insects is to develop resistance against insecticides, which is an
alarming situation for agriculture, human health and economy (Behura, 2006).
Subfamily Heliothinae (family Noctuidae), includes most of the world's major
crop pests, such as Helicoverpa zea, Helicoverpa assulta (Guenée), Helicoverpa
punctigera (Wallengren), Heliothis virescens and H. armigera. In order to understand
their ecology and develop management strategies it is important to understand the
demography of these pests (Fitt, 1989; Mitter et al., 1993). Thus, it is very important to
understand the morphological, behavioural and physiological traits of insect‟s
populations even within the species (Speight et al., 1999).
1.1. Helicoverpa armigera
Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), commonly known
as old world (African) bollworm, corn earworm, American bollworm, cotton
bollworm (English), is an economically important and a highly polyphagous pest
(Cunningham et al., 1998; Fitt, 1989; Gujar et al., 2000; Zalucki et al., 1986). H.
armigera was previously known as Heliothis armigera and was indistinguishable from
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
2
its nearest relative Helicoverpa zea (the new world bollworm). In fact both the species
were considered synonyms. The two pest species belong to two different geographical
regions of the world. However, H. armigera has widest global range across four
continents Asia, Australia, Africa and Europe whereas H. zea is present only in South
America and North America (Hardwick, 1970).
1.1.1. Occurrence and biology
H. armigera has been reported from about 200 plant species (68 plants
families) including maize, sorghum, chick pea, pigeon pea, cotton, soybean,
groundnut, sunflower and a range of vegetables. H. armigera has tropical and
subtropical origin and its adults have the ability to migrate over long distances
(Cunningham et al., 1998; Cunningham and Zalucki, 2014; Fitt, 1989; Zalucki et al.,
1986). This ability accounts for the cosmopolitan distribution of this pest across four
continents (Table 1.1) i.e. Australia, Asia, Africa and Europe.
H. armigera larvae (caterpillars) feed and sustain themselves on a wide range
of economically important crops (King, 1994). Larvae feed on the nitrogenous rich
parts of the plant, mainly reproductive structures (Fitt, 1989). Most of the time these
plant parts are harvested in the form of seed or fruiting body (King, 1994), thus
playing an important role in its transfer from one location to another. Due to its
successful adaptation to different agroecosystems, H. armigera can exhibit up to 11
generations a year under favourable conditions. During its life cycle H. armigera
female lays up to 3000 eggs on various plant parts. Depending on temperature,
incubation period ranges from approximately 3-14 days (Shanower et al., 1999).
Newly hatched larvae feed on flowers, buds, bolls and leaves of the crop (King, 1994).
Larval body colouration varies from greenish to light yellowish, reddish brown or
black (Figure 1.1). Larvae passes through 5-7 developmental stages (instars) in 12 - 32
days to reach pupation. Fluctuation in the number of larval instars and metamorphosis
depends on the host plant and the temperature. Pupal period lasts for 10-14 days
before adult emergence in the absence of diapause (dormancy) condition. Diapause
occurs under unfavourable conditions and can last for several months, thus allowing
H. armigera to survive adverse environmental conditions (King, 1994; Reed, 1965;
Shanower et al., 1999). Adult female is yellowish to orange-brown in colour and male
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
3
greenish-gray in colour (Figure 1.1) and both male and female adults feed on flower
nectar. Females release sex pheromones to attract male for mating, which occurs 3-4
days after emergence. Adults have the ability to migrate over long distances up to
1,000 kilometres. (Fitt, 1989; Shanower et al., 1999).
1.2. Global economic importance
H. armigera causes significant economic losses in the form of reduced crop
yield, poor quality of crop product, pesticide cost, increased number of pesticide
applications, time and cost of scouting required for its control. Severe economic losses
have been reported in agriculture cash crops (cotton and tobacco), maize, sweet corn
pigeon pea, chick pea, vegetables and many horticultural crops (Fitt, 1989).
Worldwide 30 percent of all the chemical pesticides are directed against this pest
(Ghulam, 2007). The exact figure of global economic losses is not possible to
determine while they cause an estimated annual loss of 5 billion US dollars with
additional over 1 billion US dollar cost of chemical pesticides (Sharma, 2005). In
Australia, economic losses during 1990-1991 were estimated to be approximately 150
million Australian dollars; mainly due to the reduction in yield and cost of pest
management. In Queensland, Australia, despite the expenditure of 4.2 million US
dollar, 7.7% reduction in cotton yield was reported (Fitt, 1994). In New Zealand,
during 1969 and 1970 the outbreak of this noctuid species damaged more than 50%
leaves of about 60% of young Pinus radiata trees. The situation in Africa is not so
different. In Ethiopia, Kenya and Tanzania the estimated yield losses due to H.
armigera and cowpea pod borer in beans were 12% to 53% (Abate and Ampofo,
1996). Moreover, in southern Africa the estimated annual yield losses in pigeon pea
reach up to US$ 317 million. In Cote d'Ivoire, between 1978 and 1983, about 60%
reduction in cotton crop yield was recorded due to H. armigera (Abate et al., 2000).
In China, high usage of chemical insecticides to control H. armigera resulted in
significant yield losses due to the reduction in predation by natural enemies and
because of high insecticide resistance. In China, before commercialization of Bt-cotton
in 1994, the estimated losses in cotton due to H. armigera were 6.6% of the total crop
loss (Wu and Guo, 2005). H. armigera has been reported to wipe out over half of the
yield of pulse crops in India (King, 1994). Ahmad (2007), reported that in Pakistan
insecticide resistance in H armigera is a widespread problem, and annually
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
4
Table 1.1 Geographical distribution of Helicoverpa armigera
European
Union
Widespread in Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Bulgaria, Georgia,
Croatia, Greece, Macedonia, Portugal (including Madeira), Romania,
Spain (including Canary Islands), France, Hungary, Italy, Russia
(European, Siberia), Switzerland, Yugoslavia; found but not
established in Germany, Netherlands; found but eradicated in UK;
intercepted only in the Czech Republic and Denmark.
Asia
Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, China (widespread),
Cyprus (locally established), Hong Kong, India (widespread),
Indonesia (widespread), Iran, Iraq, Israel, Japan, Jordan, Kazakhstan,
Korea Democratic People's Republic, Korea Republic, Kuwait,
Kyrgyzstan, Lao, Lebanon, Malaysia, Myanmar, Nepal, Pakistan,
Philippines, Saudi Arabia, Singapore, Sri Lanka, Syria, Taiwan,
Tajikistan, Thailand, Turkey, United Arab Emirates, Uzbekistan,
Viet Nam, Yemen.
Africa
Algeria, Angola, Benin, Botswana, Burkina Faso, Burundi,
Cameroon, Cape Verde, Central African Republic, Chad, Congo,
Côte d'Ivoire, Egypt, Ethiopia, Gabon, Gambia, Ghana, Guinea,
Kenya, Lesotho, Libya, Madagascar, Malawi, Mali, Malta,
Mauritania, Mauritius, Morocco, Mozambique, Namibia, Niger,
Nigeria, Réunion, Rwanda, Senegal, Seychelles, Sierra Leone,
Somalia, South Africa, St. Helena, Sudan, Tanzania, Togo, Tunisia,
Uganda, Zaire, Zambia, Zimbabwe.
Oceania
American Samoa, Australia (north of 17°S and along the east coast),
Cocos Islands, Fiji, Guam, Kiribati, Marshall Islands, Micronesia,
New Caledonia, New Zealand, Norfolk Island, Northern Mariana
Islands, Palau, Papua New Guinea, Samoa, Solomon Islands, Tonga,
Tuvalu, Vanuatu.
Data source: Helicoverpa armigera. Data Sheets on Quarantine Pests, prepared by Centre for
Agricultural Bioscience International (CABI) and European and Mediterranean Plant Protection
Organization (EPPO) for the European Union
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
5
Figure 1.1 Helicoverpa armigera a. adult female, b. Adult male, c. Pupa and d. larva
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
6
over Rs. 10 billion are being spent on the import of pesticides through registered firms
alone.
1.3. Control methods
To prevent the H. armigera damage, a variety of methods including use of
chemical pesticides and biological pesticides are being adopted (Schnepf et al., 1998).
In case of H. armigera the chemical pesticides are the first choice for its control
(Ffrench-Constant et al., 2004).
1.3.1. Chemical control
The era of modern chemical pesticides began with the discovery of
organochlorine pesticide, dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) for insect control, by
a Swiss chemist, Paul Hermann Müller (1938). Organochlorines were commercialized
in 1942 as a pest control agent after the successful application of DDT during Second
World War for protection against disease vectors. Organochlorines are acute
neurotoxins and can be divided into three groups namely DDT group,
hexachlorohexane group, and cyclodiene group (Thacker, 2002). The DDT acts on
voltage-dependent sodium channels by disrupting sodium ions flow within the axonal
membranes while hexachlorohexane and cyclodiene are gamma-aminobutyric acid
(GABA) antagonists and inhibit calcium ion influx resulting in hyperexcitation of
nerve cells (Roberts et al., 2004; Thacker, 2002). Many different types of
organochlorine pesticides including DDT, heptachlor, dicofol, chlordane,
endosulfan, aldrin, dieldrin, mirex, endrin and pentachlorophenol have been in use for
pest control since long time. Most of these agents (e.g. DDT and chlordane ) have
been banned in various countries due to the their non target toxicity, accumulation in
the environment, bioconcentration, biomagnification in food chain and harmful effects
on wild life (Metcalf, 2000).
Organophosphates derived from phosphoric acid are another class of modern
synthetic insecticides. Organophosphates act as nerve toxicants which interferes with
nervous coordination by irreversibly inhibiting the acetylcholinesterase (AChE); an
enzyme responsible for hydrolysing excess of acetylcholine (neurotransmitter) (Gupta
and Milatovic, 2012). This inhibition leads to the accumulation of acetylcholine at all
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
7
ganglia and many synapses resulting in hyperexcitation of the Central Nervous System
(CNS). This mechanism has been studied in H. virescens and H. armigera (Brown and
Bryson, 1992; Gunning et al., 1998). Organophosphates are generally classified into
three groups: I. Aliphatic compounds which are carbon chain-like in structure and
include malathion, dichlorvos, acephate, dimethoate, disulfoton, phorate,
methamidophos and mevinphos. II. Phenyl compounds which contain a phenyl ring
and are more stable than aliphatics compounds include parathion, fenitrothion and
fenthion. III. Heterocyclic compounds which possess a ring structure containing
different atoms include diazinon, azinphosmethyl and chlorpyrifos (Thacker, 2002;
Ware and Whitacre, 2004).
Carbamate insecticides are carbamic acid derivatives and are the third class of
chemical insecticides. They were discovered in 1951 when researchers were searching
for compounds other than organophosphates. Carbamates are toxic to mammals and
insects, particularly to beneficial hymenoptera e.g. honeybees. The mode of action,
site of action in CNS and the signs of intoxications of carbamates are similar to those
of the organophosphates while the catalysed reaction is relatively less stable (Gupta
and Milatovic, 2012). Since the commercialization of carbamates in 1956, more than
thirty different types of active ingredients have been developed. These active groups
can be divided into three groups, carbocyclic carbamates; is contact and feeding
poison with non-systemic effects, other chemistries belong to this group are carbaryl,
propoxure and methiocarb. Heterocyclic carbamates is the second class of carbamates
having systemic effects e.g. carbofuran and pirimicarb. The third class is aliphatic
carbamates (aldicarb, aldoxycarb, methomyl and oxamyl), are systemic in action but
extremely toxic (Thacker, 2002; Ware and Whitacre, 2004).
Identification of problems associated with the usage of DDT led to the
introduction and development of new groups of modern chemical pesticides i.e.
pyrethroids. Pyrethroids are synthetic pesticides, derived from chrysanthemic acid and
are similar to the natural pesticide (pyrethrum) extracted from the flowers of
Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium and Cynomorium coccineum. They are contact and
stomach poisons and their mechanism of action is similar to that of DDT – disrupting
the flow of sodium channel. On the basis of sodium current modification and alcohol
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
8
moiety, pyrethroids can be classified as type 1 or type 2. The type 1 group compounds
are pyrethrins, allethrin, tetramethrin while type 2 pyrethroids are fenvalerate and
fluvalinate. Pyrethroid insecticides are effective against a range of insect pests.
Susceptibility to pyrethroids toxicoses is higher in insects than mammals primarily
because of slower metabolic clearance, low body temperature and higher affinity for
the pyrethroids in insects (Ensley, 2007).
1.3.2. Biological control
Microbial pathogens such as nuclear polyhedrosis virus (NPV),
entomopathogenic fungi, Bacillus thuringiensis (Bt) and natural plant products are
used for the control of H. armigera (Thacker, 2002).
The NPV (family: Baculoviridae) is used as a microbial insecticide against
insects predominantly the Lepidopteran pests of forests and crops. For the first time, in
1892, NPV was introduced to control Lymantria monacha populations in pine forests
in Germany (Huber, 1986). Larvae are normally infected by ingestion of occlusion
bodies of virions or through vertical transmission and injection by parasitoids. After
ingestion the virions replicate in the larval midgut and the infection spreads to other
tissues through hemolymph causing secondary infections. Infection results in reduced
development, increased exposure to predation and feeding and mobility. The larva dies
in 5–8 days. Further effects may include lowered weights of pupae and adults as well
as reduced reproductive capabilities if larvae survived. Despite a great potential of
NPV for controlling Lepidopteran pests, viral insecticides are used much less than
they could be (Moscardi, 1999).
Entomopathogenic fungus, Beauvaria bassiana is the first microorganism
known to be a disease causing agent in silkworm Bombyx mori. Hundreds of
entomopathogenic fungal species have been isolated and a few of them are being used
commercially. They belong to class Entomophthorales in the Zygomycota or class
Hyphomycetes in the Deuteromycota (Eilenberg, 2002; Thacker, 2002). The fungal
infections occur in arthropods including both crop pests and those insects which are
not the pests of cultivated crops. For example Nomuraea rileyi has been used for
Lepidoptera control (Faria and Wraight, 2007; Shah and Pell, 2003).
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
9
In recent years one approach to pest management which has received
significant attention is the development of genetically engineered crops by
introgression of genes from distantly related organisms, such as bacterium Bacillus
thuringiensis (Bt). B. thuringiensis, a gram-positive bacterium possesses genes which
encode insecticidal toxins known as Cry proteins. The mechanism of action of the Cry
proteins involves the ingestion of Cry protein crystal followed by solubilisation of
crystal under the alkaline environments of the insect midgut. After solubilisation the
midgut proteolytic enzymes (proteases) convert the protoxin into active toxin. The
active toxin binds to receptor sites in the epithelial cell lining of the midgut which
results in the development of pores or ion channels in apical membrane leading to
eventual death of the insect (Gill et al., 1992; Schnepf et al., 1998). Bt insecticidal
toxins have been widely used against Dipteran, Lepidopteran and Coleopteran insect
pests (Gill et al., 1992; Höfte and Whiteley, 1989; Schnepf et al., 1998). Since the year
2004, the commercial transgenic crops were planted on approximately 170 million ha
in the world (James, 2012). These transgenic crops have decreased the use of chemical
insecticides thus benefitting the growers and also environment (Ferré and Van Rie,
2002). Growing Bt cotton has become a key source of effectively controlling the
damage caused by the pink bollworm (Pectinophora gossypiella) and cotton bollworm
(H. armigera) (Li et al., 2006; Wan et al., 2005; Wu et al., 2003).
1.4. Insecticide resistance
The first case of insecticides resistance was documented by Melander (1914) in
scale insects against an inorganic insecticide. After that a number of cases of
resistance to inorganic insecticides were reported which result in the development of
organic insecticides. But unfortunately organic insecticides face the same situation. By
the year 1947, housefly (Musca domestica) had developed resistance to DDT
(Busvine, 1971). With the introduction of every new insecticide chemistry for pest
control, such as organochlorine, organophosphates, carbamates, and pyrethroids, cases
of insecticide resistance were documented within two to 20 years (IRAC, 2013).
Development of a high level of insecticide resistance in insects is due to the high level
usage of chemical insecticides which have further led to the spread of resistance-
associated mutations (Ffrench-Constant et al., 2004; Ghulam, 2007).
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
10
1.5. Mechanisms of insecticide resistance
Insecticide resistance occurs either through mutation in the targets site of
insecticides or through changes in the activity of metabolic enzymes that degrade
insecticides before they reach the target site. Insecticide resistance mechanisms in
insects can be divided into four groups; behavioural resistance (a shift in behaviour to
avoid exposure to insecticides), penetration resistance (changes in the insect‟s gut
lining or cuticle), target site resistance (characterized by mutations in the
acetylcholinesterase, sodium channel and GABA receptor genes) and metabolic
resistance (alterations in the levels or activities of detoxification proteins including
Glutathione S-transferase, Carboxylesterase; Cytochrome P450 monooxygenase). In
insects resistance is evolved against insecticides through single method or in
combination of these mechanisms (Ffrench-Constant, 2007; Hemingway et al., 2004;
Li et al., 2007).
1.5.1. Behavioural resistance
An insect shows a shift in behaviour to avoid exposure to insecticides or plants
that possess non-host chemicals (Pittendrigh et al., 2007). Although behavioral
resistance remains controversial, there are strong arguments in the published literature
which support the role of behavioral resistance in insects. This mechanism has been
reported in pyrethroid resistant strain of horn fly (Haematobia irritans) and the
tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens) along with target-site insensitivity and
enhanced detoxification mechanisms (Sparks et al., 1989). No literature is available
explaining behavioural resistance mechanism in H. armigera.
1.5.2. Cuticular penetration resistance
Penetration resistance involves the slower absorption of insecticide through the
barriers of outer cuticle layers which prevent the entry or penetration of insecticide
into the insect body. Thus reduced penetration provides more time for detoxification
enzyme to metabolise the insecticides. This mechanism frequently works in
combination with other resistance mechanisms (Pittendrigh et al., 2007). Reduced
cuticular penetration insecticide resistance has been reported in housefly (Musca
domestica) and mosquito (Culex pipiens) (Raymond et al., 2002; Seifert and Scott,
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
11
2002). Metabolism studies of different insecticides using in vivo and in vitro methods
in H. armigera indicate that lowered cuticular penetration appears to be an important
resistance mechanism (Ahmad and McCaffery, 1999; Gunning et al., 1995).
1.5.3. Target site insensitivity
Target site insensitivity is one of the most important mechanisms of
resistance occurs due to alteration at the target site (insecticide receptor site). The
alteration prevents the binding of insecticide to its site of action, thus allowing the
insect to survive under stress condition (Mullin and Scott, 1992). In insects
knockdown resistance (Kdr) is the well-known resistance mechanism against
dichlorodiphenyltrichloroethane (DDT) and pyrethroids. Kdr resistance is associated
with mutations in the sodium-channel gene, the main target of pyrethroids.
Furthermore, in vitro studies have demonstrated that sodium-channel insensitivity
confer resistance to DDT and pyrethroids (Davies et al., 2007). Target site alteration
have been found in several species, including tobacco budworm (H. virescens) and
Colorado potato beetle (Clarke and Ottea, 1997; Sharif et al., 2007). Increased target
site insensitivity with Super-Kdr was reported in H. armigera from Australia (Gunning
et al., 1991). Furthermore, acetylcholinesterase (AChE) target site resistance has been
shown in carbamate resistant strain of H. armigera and was considered an intractable
resistance mechanism in pests (Gunning, 2006). But the level of target site
insensitivity varies in H. armigera collected from India, China, Thailand and Australia
(Russell and Kranthi, 2006). Reports indicate that reduction in pyrethroids selection
pressure is responsible for the replacement of pyrethroid resistance mechanisms from
nerve insensitivity to metabolic form of resistance (Forrester et al., 1993).
1.5.4. Metabolic resistance
Metabolic resistance involves biochemical transformation of a toxic compound
or insecticide, thus decreasing its capability to interact with a target site. Biochemical
transformation in insects comprises three integrated distinct phases (I, II and III).
Phase I involves the oxidation of insecticide by cytochrome P450 monooxygenases
(P450s). In phase II, the activated insecticide is converted into water-soluble substrate
by Glutathione S-transferases (GSTs). In phase III, the less toxic metabolite is
eliminated from the cell. An increase in the levels or activities of these detoxificative
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
12
enzymes (P450s, GSTs and carboxylesterase) due to gene duplication, transcriptional
enhancements and mutations in coding sequences of genes are responsible for
increased detoxification (Li et al., 2007; Sheehan et al., 2001).
Cytochrome P450-dependent monooxygenase enzymes the members of a
superfamily of heme-containing proteins and are very important in the oxidative
metabolism of endogenous compounds such as fatty acids, hormones and steroids, and
exogenous compounds including pesticides, drugs and toxins from plants (Feyereisen,
2005; Scott, 2008). More than 660 genes encoding P450 of insects, disseminated in
different insect families and subfamilies have been characterized (Li et al., 2007).
P450s genes are designated by prefix CYP; insect P450s have been categorized into
six CYP families; CYP6, CYP9, CYP12, CYP18 and CYP28 are insect specific, and
CYP4 is shared with sequences from other organisms (Nelson et al., 1996).
Monooxygenases are found in all aerobic organisms. They are mostly found in the
endoplasmic reticulum or mitochondria of eukaryotes and in soluble form in bacteria
(Scott, 1999). In P450 catalysed reactions hemoproteins activate dioxygen producing
two atomic oxygens, which catalyses the regio- and stereospecic oxidations of
unactivated hydrocarbons (C-H). The first atom of oxygen is introduced into the
organic substrate e.g. insecticide, whereas the second oxygen atom is reduced to water.
Catalytic activity of P450s is dependent on a protein redox partner to deliver one or
more electrons from NADH or NADPH to the P450 heme center. Redox reaction
proteins are cytochrome P450 reductase, cytochrome b5 (mirosomal), adrenodoxin
reductase and adrenodoxin (mitochondrial), ferredoxin reductase and a ferredoxin
(bacterial) (Feyereisen, 2005; Urlacher and Girhard, 2012). The P450 catalysed
reactions play an important role in metabolic insecticide resistance in insects. P450
monooxygenases show large variation in substrate specificity. In insects, a wide range
of tissues produces monooxygenases; highest activities are usually associated with the
midgut, fat bodies and malpighian tubules. The expression patterns of individual
P450s vary at different life stages of insects (Scott, 1999). Constitutive over-
expression of P450 monooxygenase genes is associated with resistance to insecticides
in many insects and elevated metabolism is confirmed at the biochemical level as an
important resistance mechanism to pyrethroids in H. armigera from Asia (Yang et al.,
2006; Yang et al., 2004). The specific gene responsible for insecticide resistance in H.
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
13
armigera has not yet been identified in the field population but the quest for
cytochrome P450 genes involved in metabolic resistance continues. One of the earlier
studies from Australia involves the isolation and sequencing of CYP6B2 gene, with the
assumption that CYP6B2 is important in metabolic resistance to pyrethroids while
there could likely be other P450 genes which may also be important in resistance
(Xiao-Ping and Hobbs, 1995). Although it has shown that CYP6B7 has no role in
resistance (Grubor and Heckel, 2007) but there are some reports claiming its role in
pyrethroids resistance. Additionally isolation and characterization of CYP6B2,
CYP6B6, and CYP6B7 genes was done in a pyrethroid resistant strain from Australia.
The mRNA for CYP6B7 was found to be over-expressed in pyrethroid resistant
population of H. armigera thus responsible for pyrethroid metabolism (Ranasinghe
and Hobbs, 1998). Yang et al., (2006) from China isolated P450 genes, CYP9A12,
CYP9A14, CYP6B7 and CYP4G8 from H. armigera YGF (a laboratory selected strain)
by reverse transcriptase polymerase reaction (RT-PCR) and rapid amplification of
cDNA ends (RACE). Constitutive over expression of multiple cytochrome P450 genes
(CYP9A12, CYP9A14, and CYP6B7) was assumed to be linked with pyrethroid
resistance. cDNA-amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis in ANO2
strain of H. armigera revealed two P450 genes CYP337B1, CYP4S1, a
carboxylesterase-like gene and a glutathione S-transferase gene were found to be
constitutively overexpressed. CYP337B1 was found to be tightly linked to the resistant
locus RFen1, suggesting that this P450 may be responsible in a fenvalerate
(pyrethroid) resistant strain (Wee et al., 2008). Expression profiling of multiple P450s
in H. armigera deltamethrin resistant strain (lab and field collected strain) from Africa
and Spain showed significant overexpression of multiple genes (CYP4M6, CYP4M7,
CYP6AE11, CYP9A12, CYP332A1 and CYP337B1) (Brun-Barale et al., 2010).
Recently, in order to explore the role of CYP337B1 in fenvalerate resistant strain
TWB, a new chimeric gene CYP337B3 was found. CYP337B3 gene which resulted
from an unequal crossing over between two parental genes, CYP337B1 and
CYP337B2, has been reported from a susceptible TWB strain of H. armigera, in
Australia (Joussen et al., 2012).
Glutathione S-transferase (GSTs) is another important large gene family of
metabolic enzymes. Phase II metabolic enzymes are responsible for the detoxification
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
14
of an extensive variety of synthetic and toxic chemicals including insecticides. GSTs
are located in microsomes, cytosol, mitochondria and peroxisomes within the cell
(Udomsinprasert et al., 2005). In insects GSTs are classified into three major classes
(class I, class II, and class III). Class I and III are designated delta and epsilon classes,
respectively while class II is designated as sigma class which includes GSTs from
several mammalian classes. These enzymes are involved in metabolic resistance by
detoxification of various endogenous and synthetic compounds through glutathione
conjugation, dehydrochlorination and glutathione peroxidase activity (Li et al., 2007).
In GSTs catalysed reactions, electrophilic compounds are conjugated with the thiol
group (SH) of reduced glutathione (GSH) thus making the end products more water
soluble that can be easily excreted (Enayati et al., 2005). In insects, organophosphate,
organochlorine and pyrethroid resistance is GST-mediated (Li et al., 2007).
Dehydrochlorination of DDT is an important GST mediated resistance mechanism
reported in houseflies and mosquitoes. Higher levels of GSTs activity have been
reported to be linked to insecticide resistance in many insects. It is not evident that
either increase in the expression of GST enzymes or gene amplification are involved in
insecticide resistance (Enayati et al., 2005). In H. virescens GSTs are involved in
resistance to profenofos. GST activity was found to be significantly higher in phoxim-
resistant H. armigera which shows correlation between increased GSTs activity and
insecticide resistance (Ahmad, 2007; Li et al., 2007).
Esterase is known to be the 3rd key group of metabolic enzymes involved in
detoxification of insecticides. In insects, elevated level of esterases is frequently
implicated in resistance against organophosphates, carbamates and pyrethroids. In
addition to overexpression of esterase genes, single point mutations are known to play
role in insecticide resistance. Esterases detoxify the insecticides by sequestration
(rapid-binding and slow turnover of insecticide) and hydrolysis reactions (Achaleke et
al., 2009; Hemingway et al., 2004; Li et al., 2007). Increase in the sequestration is due
to gene amplification, as has been reported in an aphid (Myzus persicae), mosquitoes
(Culex quinquefasciatus, C. pipiens, C. tarsalis and C. tritaeniorhynchus) and the
brown planthopper (Nilaparvata lugens) (Hemingway et al., 2004). Elevated level of
esterases has been reported in Bt (Cry1Ac toxin) resistant H. armigera (Gunning et al.,
2005).
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
15
1.6. Genomics of insecticide resistance
Currently molecular techniques are being extensively used to study the ecology
and molecular biology of insects (Symondson, 2002). In this regard significant work
has been done to understand the diversification and ecology of insects. In early days of
classical genetics phenotypic markers were used to understand different traits of
insects e.g. eye colours, body shape and hairs etc. In 1910, Thomas Hunt Morgan
constructed genetic map of fruit fly (D. melanogaster) based on one phenotypic
character, eye colour (Benson, 2001). The advantage of phenotypic markers is that
they are present through the lifespan. Further these markers can be used in field
conditions. But there are limitations of using these markers; such as they are
comparatively rare, hard to score, time consuming, interfere with overall fitness of
organism and require inheritance pattern as additional information. To overcome the
limitation of phenotypic markers, scientists chose alternative markers known as
biochemical markers or protein markers (blood antigens or isozymes). These markers
have made a significant contribution in understanding insect diversity and ecology.
These markers were used to study inter- and intra-species variation based on
discrepancy in allozymes, insecticide resistance, pathogen identification and
chromosome mapping (Behura, 2006).
However, with the progress in DNA technologies, DNA markers were found to
be superior to protein markers. DNA markers provide greater level of polymorphism
(variation) with a high stability than protein markers and are not affected by genotype
x environment interaction. Further, unlike protein, DNA can be obtained from any
tissue at any developmental stage of life. Thus, DNA markers are considered to be the
most common technique used in molecular chemical ecology in insects (Hoy, 2003;
Richardson et al., 1986).
1.7. Genome mapping
Genome mapping is one of the fundamental approaches used to describe
the relative position of DNA fragments on chromosomes. The DNA fragments that are
placed on chromosomes are known as molecular markers (coding and non-coding
DNA) (Dear, 2001). About a hundred year ago genetic map of Drosophila X-
chromosome was constructed (Sturtevant, 1913). Since then molecular markers have
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
16
made great contribution to quantitatively inherited trait studies and polymorphisms at
the DNA level in insects. The mapping approaches can be separated into two different
techniques, genetic mapping (linkage maps) and physical mapping.
1.7.1. Genetic mapping
Genetic mapping or linkage mapping is a technique used to construct a linkage
map indicating the location of genetic markers or known DNA sequences (DNA
fragments) corresponding to chromosomes. Linkage map is useful for locating the
genes responsible for monogenic and polygenic traits. Linkage analysis is applied to
crosses in order to score polymorphisms in parents and offspring. Normally
backcrosses and interspecies crosses are analysed through linkage analysis. Moreover,
gene location and distribution of DNA markers on linkage groups are estimated by
using different statistical tools. DNA markers commonly include morphological
mutants, microsatellites, SNPs (single nucleotide polymorphisms), RFLP analysis
(restriction fragment length polymorphisms), RAPD analysis (randomly amplified
polymorphic DNA) and AFLP analysis (amplified fragment length polymorphisms)
(Heckel, 2003). Further these markers are grouped into dominant markers (RAPD and
AFLP) and co-dominant markers (RFLP, SNPs and SSR).
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
17
1.8. DNA markers to evaluate genetic diversity
1.8.1. Microsatellites
Microsatellites studies of nuclear DNA markers are used in population genetics
and evolutionary relationships (Zhang, 2004). Microsatellite markers are segments of
DNA sequences which consist of tandem repeats of 2–6 nucleotides and found at high
frequency in the nuclear genome. Normally microsatellite fragment consist of 5 to 40
repeats. Commonly used microsatellites are simple sequence repeats (SSR), short
tandem repeats (STR) and variable number tandem repeats (VNTR) (Ellegren, 2004;
Selkoe and Toonen, 2006). The surrounding DNA sequence (flanking regions) of
microsatellite remain conserved within and between genomes in different species.
Primers are designed for flanking regions to amplify the microsatellite fragments
through polymerase chain reaction (PCR) (Selkoe and Toonen, 2006). Microsatellite
markers are highly abundant and variably dispersed in both coding and non-coding
DNA, thus produce great numbers of markers compared to other marker systems e.g.
AFLP (Behura, 2006). It has been recently reported that these microsatellites can be
used comprehensively beyond population genetics and phylogenetic relationship
studies (Schloetterer, 2001). Microsatellite markers have been successfully used for
linkage mapping in mosquitoes (Anopheles gambiae) (Heckel, 2003). The
disadvantage of microsatellites is that they cannot be used as neutral markers due to
their involvement in gene regulation, genetic drift and differential selection in sexes.
Hence, microsatellite markers may not be useful in evolutionary relationships and
phylogenetic analysis (Behura, 2006). The use of microsatellite markers in
Lepidoprteran insects including H. armigera is challenging (Ji et al., 2003; Zhang,
2004). In Lepidopteran genome microsatellite markers are abundant possessing almost
identical flanking DNA sequences, which result in low efficiency of microsatellite
isolation (Zhang, 2004).
1.8.2. Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs)
Single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) are variations based on single
nucleotide differences. Variations occur due to the introduction of point mutations in
DNA sequences without changing the overall length of the DNA sequence. SNPs exist
abundantly throughout the genome in both coding and non-coding DNA sequences.
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
18
Single nucleotide mutation in non-coding DNA has no direct effect on the phenotype.
However, such mutations in coding or promoter and enhancer DNA regions have
direct impact on protein structure and gene regulation (Syvanen, 2001). The
abundance of SNPs in insect genome has proven to be useful in population genetics,
marker assisted selection and genetic mapping. A number of SNPs have been reported
to be associated with insecticide resistance in several insects; including cotton-melon
aphid (Aphis gossypii), codling moth (Cydia pomonella) and red flour
beetle (Tribolium castaneum) but SNPs polymorphism study in insects is mostly
limited to Drosophila and mosquitoes (Andreev et al., 1994; Andrews et al., 2004;
Black and Vontas, 2007; Brun-Barale et al., 2005; Steichen et al., 1993). In Anopheles
gambiae (a pyrethroid resistant mosquitoe), SNPs were used for identifying resistance-
associated polymorphisms but association mapping was found to be challenging in A.
gambia (Weetman et al., 2010). Thus it is a difficult task to find out genetic variation
involved in pesticide resistance at a selected gene. Currently, due to the automation in
the form of high-throughput, automated SNP detection methods can be used for
hundreds of thousands of SNPs simultaneously. But high-throughput technology will
be expensive in case of identifying only few markers associated with an important
phenotype such as insecticide resistance.
1.8.3. Restriction fragment length polymorphisms (RFLPs)
RFLP markers are hybridization-based molecular markers and are commonly
used for genetic analysis since their introduction in 1974. In RFLPs, variations in the
length of DNA (nuclear DNA, mitochondrial DNA, and ribosomal DNA or
hypervariable sequences) fragments are identified through differential digestion of the
isolated DNA with restriction endonucleases followed by southern blot procedure
(Botstein et al., 1980; Semagn et al., 2006; Severson, 1996). Restriction enzyme
cleaves DNA at a specific recognition site within a genome. More than 3800
restriction enzymes are known out of which more than 611 are commercially available
(Roberts et al., 2007). The observed variation within and among population depends
on the number of probes and restriction enzymes used. RFLP technique is
advantageous having high reproducibility, co-dominant inheritance, DNA sequences
information is not needed and is easy to score. RFLP markers system has been used
extensively for linkage mapping in many plant and animal species and can provide
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
19
information about phylogenies of populations, geographic variation, parentage and
relatedness and gene flow (Botstein et al., 1980; Semagn et al., 2006; Severson, 1996).
In entomology RFLP analysis have been used for several insects including; Colorado
potato beetle (Leptinotarsa decemlineate), mosquitoes (Aedes scutellaris, Aedes
aegypti, Armigeres subalbatus, Culex pipiens and Cx. tritaeniorhynchus and
Anopheles quardrimaculatus), cicadas (Magicicada), screwworm (Cochliomyia
hominivorax), monarch butterfly (Danaus plexippus), cricket (Cryllus firmus), blowfly
(Phormia regina), apple maggot fly (Rhagoletis pomonella) and fruit fly (D.
melanogaster) (Heckel, 2003; Hoy, 2003). Furthermore the RFLP markers were used
to determine DDT resistance association with knockdown (Kdr) trait in housefly
(Musca domestica) (Behura, 2006). However, there are several limitations for RFLP
analysis; requires high quantity and quality of DNA, show low level of polymorphism
because few bands are scored per assay, is dependent of specific probe library for an
organism, costly, laborious and lengthy procedure (Semagn et al., 2006).
1.8.4. Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD)
Randomly amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) also known as multiple
arbitrary amplicon profiling, is a PCR based genetic marker system. RAPD was
introduced by Williams et al., (1990). By using RAPD markers the polymorphism
within and among populations is observed by amplifying target DNA by using a single
arbitrary oligonucleotide primer (nucleotide sequence, mostly ten bases long). Further
prior knowledge of the target sequence is not required and the arbitrary primer binds
randomly at two different positions on complementary strands of DNA (Jonah et al.,
2011; Semagn et al., 2006).
The RAPD markers have been used in gene mapping and to determine isolated
populations at geographic and genetic level. Polymorphism in the non-coding DNA
sequences is revealed by using RAPD markers. Thus it is helpful to determine the
genetic structure of populations of different species (Jain et al., 2010). RAPD markers
have been used to determine parentage in Anax parthenope and Orthetrum
coerulescens (keeled skimmer), genetic linkage map in aphids, genotyping in
silkworm, vectorial ability in Triatoma infestans and mosquitoes (Jonah et al., 2011).
RAPDs have been used to construct an integrated map in tobacco budworm (H.
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
20
virescens) and to study genes involved in chemical and biological (Bt toxin) resistance
(Heckel, 2003). Sequence characterized amplified region (SCAR) markers, derived
from specific RAPD loci of H. armigera have been used to check the presence of H.
armigera in predator (Dicyphus tamaninii) gut. In a study on the genetic structure of
H. armigera population, using RAPD-PCR 84 possible polymorphic RAPD loci were
investigated (Agusti et al., 1999; Jonah et al., 2011). However, there are certain
limitations to the use of RAPD markers. For example, in insect ecological studies
RAPD markers have shown poor reproducibility, loss of information of recessive
characters due to their dominant nature, and as well the primer short lengths often
results in loss of bands (Behura, 2006; Jonah et al., 2011).
1.8.5. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP)
The amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) is a dominant biallelic
marker system based on RFLP based polymorphism principle with more efficient PCR
amplification of restricted fragments (Vos et al., 1995). The drawbacks of RAPD
marker system are overcome by the adaptation AFLP markers. AFLP generate more
reproducible and stable markers (50-100 bands per primer pair) than RAPD and does
not require prior knowledge DNA sequence (Behura, 2006; Jonah et al., 2011). AFLPs
generally have co-dominant mode of inheritance in nature but some times dominant
AFLPs are also amplified (Behura, 2006). Due to AFLP's dominant mode of
inheritance it is not applicable to study genetic variation within same breed but is
highly informative in case of determining relationship between different breeds
(Buntjer et al., 2002; De Marchi et al., 2006). AFLPs are used for gene mapping and
QTL analysis (quantitative trait loci), construction of linkage maps of genomes,
genetic differentiation and genetic relationships (Behura, 2006; Ming and Wang,
2006). Moreover, cDNA AFLP has been used for expression profiling of differentially
expressed genes in insects; H. armigera (Wee et al., 2008). AFLP markers are useful
in understanding evolution of sexual communication in H. virescens and Heliothis
subflexa (Gould et al., 2010) and to determine differences in sexual communication
between different strains of Spodoptera frugiperda (Unbehend et al., 2013). In insects
AFLP markers have broadly been used to construct linkage maps and are available for
several insects; namely, silkworm, European corn borer, red flour beetle, Hawaiian
cricket, Hessian fly and butterfly (Behura, 2006). Similarly AFLP based linkage maps
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
21
for several agricultural pests including L. decemlineata, P. xylostella and H. armigera
are used to find out the loci (gene) conferring resistance to chemical and biological
(Bt) pesticides (Heckel, 2003).
1.8.6. Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) markers
Mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) represents only a small fraction of total
genomic DNA of an organism but has been a valuable marker in molecular
systematics, diversity and evolutionary studies. Moreover, it has been used in gene
flow analysis, biogeography and hybridization studies (Galtier et al., 2009; Hoy,
2003). There are certain reasons for using mtDNA as a valuable marker; it has tiny
size, is easy to amplify due to presence of multiple copies per cell, remains conserved
across animals, has no intronic sequence, is highly variable in natural populations, has
maternal mode of inheritance, lacks recombination, and its variable DNA regions are
flanked by highly conserved ribosomal DNA sequences (Galtier et al., 2009; Gissi et
al., 2008). Recent studies indicate that pseudogenes are present in mtDNA which
could be a limitation. But still using mtDNA is the most suitable and inexpensive
technique for genetic exploration of new and wild species.
In insects, mtDNA has recently been used as a potential marker for the study of
population genetics and phylogenetics. Insect mitochondrial genome consists of 37
genes coding for two ribosomal RNA, 22 transfer RNA genes and 13 protein coding
genes (Hoy, 2003). Molecular techniques such as RFLP and sequencing are applied in
mtDNA ecological studies. In sequencing, specific regions or gene regions of the
mtDNA are amplified. Mitochondrial genes, cytochrome oxidase subunit I and II (COI
and COII) and cytochrome B (CytB) are usually studied. Animal mitochondrial COI
gene is adopted as the standardized tool to study the within-gene heterogeneity,
evolutionary rate and its application for evolutionary analyses (Ratnasingham and
Hebert, 2007).
DNA barcoding is a very recent term used for diversity and phylogenetic
analysis within and among the populations. Partial sequence of COI gene (658 base
pair) has been used extensively by scientists for taxonomic identification of organisms.
Introduction and Review of Literature Chapter 1
22
COI gene (5ʹ-end DNA sequence) is used as a standard because of its robustness and
wide range of phylogenetic signal (Hebert et al., 2003; Ramadan and Baeshen, 2012).
Several insect species; including, Reticultermes lucifugus grassei (Jenkins et
al., 2001), Coptotermes formosanus (Jenkins et al., 2002), Reticulitermes flavipes,
Reticulitermes arenincola, Reticulitermes santonensis (Ye et al., 2004), Reticulitermis
urbis (Leniaud et al., 2010), Simulium vittatum Zetterstedt (Gaudreau et al., 2010),
Planococcus citri, Planococcus minor (Rung et al., 2008), Phenacoccus solenopsis
(Ashfaq et al. 2010) and Planococcus relictus (Bon et al., 2008) have been identified
and characterised using COI gene. For H. armigera diversity study partial COI gene
was amplified from 249 individuals collected from different locations of the world.
This diversity study supports that H. zea and H. armigera belong to different
geographical regions (Behere et al., 2007).
1.9. Research objective
The present research work is aimed at the identification and investigation of
novel genes and mechanisms involved in metabolic insecticide resistance in H.
armigera with particular focus on a pyrethroid (cypermethrin) and to find out the
genes regulating the over-expression of cytochrome P450 and GSTs in the resistant
insects.
Materials and Methods Chapter 2
23
Chapter 2
General materials and methods
2.1. Insect collection
Helicoverpa armigera adults and larvae of the pyrethroid-resistant and -
susceptible strains were collected from two different geographical regions of the world
viz. Asia (Pakistan) and Australia (Table 2.1). The resistant strains were collected
from the areas where the insecticides were used frequently for bollworm control while
the susceptible strains were collected from areas under minimum exposure to
insecticides. The collected specimens were maintained in the laboratory under
insecticide-free environment. The collected samples were used for DNA/RNA
extraction (adults and larvae) and establishment of cultures for toxicological and
biochemical study.
2.2. Helicoverpa armigera diets and rearing
Larvae of different strains were reared on bioserve (general purpose
Lepidoptera diet, product No. F9772) and pinto bean diet. The bioserve diet contains
144 g/L of bioserve diet powder and 19 g/L of agar. The pinto bean diet contains pinto
bean powder 125 g/L, wheat germ 100 g/L, soy protein 50 g/L, casein 50 g/L, torula
yeast 62.5 g/L, ascorbic acid 6.0 g/L, methyl paraben (4-
hydroxybenzoesauremethylester) 5 g/L, sorbic acid 3 g/L, Vanderzant vitamin mixture
10 g/L, tetracycline 0.25 g/L and agar 35 g/L. The diet was cooked and sterilised under
UV light for 30-60 min in laminar air flow hood. The larvae were reared individually
up to adult stage in plastic cups. Emerged adults were nourished with a 10% honey-
water solution. H. armigera (larvae, adult, eggs and pupa) were placed in
environmental chambers at 26 ± 1°C, 55% RH, with 16 h light and 8 h dark
photoperiod.
2.3. Chemical insecticide and toxicity test
Resistance levels of H. armigera strains were determined against technical
grade cypermethrin (mixture of isomers, purity ≥98%, Sigma-Aldrich, Germany). Five
Materials and Methods Chapter 2
24
serial concentrations of cypermethrin were prepared in acetone and 1 µL of the
insecticide was applied on the thorax region of the larva using Hamilton syringe. For
every concentration 30 to 40 third instar larvae, each weighing 20 to 30 mg, were
treated. In order to investigate the possible role of P450 monooxygenases mediated
resistance, piperonyl butoxide (PBO) (Endura Fine Chemicals, Italy) was applied 2 h
prior to the application of cypermethrin. Before and after the treatment larvae were
allowed to feed on artificial diet following the normal rearing conditions. Mortality
was observed after 48 h of the treatment and a larva was considered to be dead if it did
not respond to the stimulus. Observed mortalities were transformed by probit analysis
using SPSS and Statistics software packages (version 17.0) for linear regression
analysis to determine slope of LD50 values.
2.4. Genomic DNA extraction
For DNA isolation, various methods were applied depending on tissue part and
life stage of H. armigera. DNA extraction protocol reported by Wee et al., (2008) was
used with some modifications and DNA was extracted from a whole larva or from the
thorax of the individual adults. Individual tissues were transferred into 1.5 ml
Eppendorf tubes containing metallic beads and 600 µL DNA isolation buffer (50 mM
Tris-HCL, pH 8.5, 0.1 N NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 10 mM EDTA and 0.2% SDS). The
samples were crushed with the help of Tissue Lyser II machine (cat # 85300, Qiagen,
Germany) for 2-3 min at 30 Hz. Homogenates were transferred into fresh Eppendorf
tubes containing 400 µL TE-equilibrated phenol (pH 8.0), closed the tube, vortexed
vigorously and placed on ice. Tubes were centrifuged at 13000 rpm (Micocentrifuge,
Eppendorf: Germany) for 5 min at room temperature. Aqueous fractions were
transferred to a fresh tube and after adding 3 µL of 10 mg/ml RNase A were incubated
at 37°C for 2 h. Added 400 µL chloroform, mixed it and centrifuged at 13000 rpm
(Micocentrifuge, Eppendorf: Germany) for 5 min at room temperature. Supernatant
was transferred into fresh vials and 800 µL pre-chilled 100% ethanol was added. The
vial contents were mixed by gentle inversion of the tube and allowed to precipitate for
2 h at -20°C. Centrifuged at 13000 rpm (Micocentrifuge, Eppendorf: Germany) for 20
min at 4°C, carefully decanted the supernatant to avoid loss of pellet. Pellet was
washed with 200 µL ethanol (70%) by centrifugation at 13000 rpm (Micocentrifuge,
Eppendorf: Germany) for 10 min at 4°C. Supernatant was decanted carefully and left
Materials and Methods Chapter 2
25
over ethanol was removed with a pipette. Pellet was dried at room temperature for 30
min, re-suspended in 100 µL nuclease free water and finally stored at -20°C until used.
2.5. RNA extraction
Total ribonucleic acid (RNA) was extracted from the whole larval body using
Trizol reagent (Invitrogen, Inc). Larvae were homogenized individually using pestle
and mortar to a fine powder in liquid nitrogen and then mixed with one ml of Trizole
reagent 50 mg tissue. Homogenate was centrifuged at 13000 rpm for 10 min at 4°C.
Supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube and incubated for 5 min at room
temperature. Added 0.2 ml chloroform per ml of trizol, vortexed vigorously, incubated
for 2-3 min at the room temperature and centrifuged for about 10 min at 13000 rpm
and 4°C. The aqueous phase was transferred into a fresh vial, added 0.5 ml isopropyl
alcohol per one ml Trizol, mixed well and incubated for 10 min at room temperature
followed by centrifugation at 13000 rpm and 4°C for 10 min. The supernatant was
decanted and the resulting pellet was washed with 75% ethanol (one ml/per ml of
trizol). Following the centrifugation for 5 min at 13000 rpm max and 4°C, supernatant
containing ethanol was discarded. Resulting RNA pellet was air dried for 5-10 min
and dissolved in 100 μL of diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC)-treated water and stored at -
80°C.
2.6. RNA purification
a. DNase treatment
To remove DNA contamination from the isolated RNA, 10 µL of 1X DNase
buffer and 2 U of DNaseI (Ambion, Texas, USA) were mixed and incubated for 30
min at 37°C.
b. Purification
RNA was purified by using RNeasy® Mini EluteTM
clean up kit (cat # 74204,
Qiagen, Germany). Each RNA sample volume was adjusted up to 200 μL with RNase-
free water followed by the addition of 700 μL RLT Buffer and mixing. Then 500 μL
of 100% ethanol was added and mixed thoroughly by gentle pipetting. The sample
Materials and Methods Chapter 2
26
mixture was transferred to an RNeasy MinElute spin column and centrifuged for 15
sec at 10000 rpm. The column was placed in a new collection tube and 500 μL buffer
RPE was added into the column before centrifugation at 10000 rpm for 15 sec. RNA
attached to column membrane was washed with 500 μL of 80% ethanol by
centrifugation for 2 min at 10000 rpm. The flow-through was discarded while the
RNeasyMinElute spin column was transferred to fresh 1.5 ml collection tube. For
RNA elution, 20 μL of RNase-free water was added to the column membrane. RNA
was collected in collection tube after centrifugation for one min at 13000 rpm and
stored at -80°C.
2.7. Quantitation of DNA/RNA
The DNA/RNA was quantified with NanoDrop (ND-1000 spectrophotometer
(NanoDrop Technologies, Inc. USA). The total absorbance of the samples was
measured at 260 nm while using nuclease free or DEPC water as a blank to set
machine at zero. The purity of DNA and RNA was measured at 260 nm and 280 nm at
260/280 (ratio of absorbance). Further the purity of RNA was checked by Agilent
RNA 6000 Nano Kit (Agilent Technologies, Inc. Germany).
2.8. cDNA synthesis
Synthesis of first cDNA strand was carried out using RevertAIDTM
H Minus
first strand cDNA synthesis kit (Fermentas GmbH, Germany). For a 500 ng of total
RNA, 5X Reaction buffer, 200 U RevertAIDTM
H Minus M-MuLV reverse
transcriptase, 20 U RiboLockTM
RNase inhibitor, 10 mM dNTPS, 50 µM oligo (dT)18
primer were added in a 20 µL reaction and cDNA synthesis was performed at 42°C for
30 min, 50°C for 60 min and 95°C for 2 min.
2.9. PCR amplification
For diagnostic purpose 10 μL to 25 μL of PCR reaction mixture was used
while 50 μL of PCR reaction mixture was used for the cloning or sequencing of PCR
products. The PCR mixture contained 20 -200 ng template DNA, 1X of 10X Taq
polymerase buffer (optimised for Taq, contains 15 mM MgCl2) (Fermentas), 2.5 mM
dNTPs (Fermentas), 0.5 μM each of primers and 1 U Taq polymerase
Materials and Methods Chapter 2
27
(Fermentas). PCR amplification was carried out in thermal cycler (Eppendorf) which
was programmed as: 95°C for 5 min followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30 sec,
annealing at 50°C to 60°C for 30 sec (depending on melting temperature of primers),
72°C for variable times (dependent on the targeted region fragment length) followed
by a final extension for 5 min at 72°C.
2.10. Gel extraction and purification of PCR product
PCR product was used directly or extracted from the gel with a clean, sharp
scalpel on a UV transilluminator. Further, the DNA fragment from the excised gel
slice was extracted using a MinElute Gel Extraction Kit (Qiagen, Germany) with some
modifications. The gel slice in Eppendorf tube was weighed and 3 volumes of buffer
QG to 1 volume of gel was added. The tube was incubated for 10 min at 50°C and
vortexed until the gel slice was completely dissolved. Then 1X gel volume of
isopropanol was added to the sample and mixed. For PCR product purification
MinElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen, Germany) was used. Five volumes of buffer
PB to one volume of the PCR sample were added. In both kits method for direct
purification of PCR product or gel extraction the mixtures were loaded on MinElute
column and centrifuged at 10000 rpm for 30 sec. The column was washed by adding
750 µL of buffer PE followed by centrifugation 13000 rpm for 30 sec. The flow
through was discarded and the column was transferred to fresh collection tube. The
samples (DNA/PCR) were eluted from the column by adding 10 µL buffer EB or
ddH2O. The column was discarded and the eluted samples were stored at -20°C.
2.11. Ligation
The purified PCR products were quantified and then subjected to ligation into
appropriate vector. For cloning and sequencing purpose pGEM®-T vector systems
(Promega, USA) was used. Ligation mixture (10 µL) included 2X rapid ligation
buffer, 50 ng PCR product, 50 ng pGEM®-T vector, 3 U T4 DNA ligase and ddH2O.
2.12. Cloning and transformation
The ligation mixture was kept for one hour at room temperature followed by
transformation into TOP10 competent cells (Escherichia coli) (Invitrogen life
Materials and Methods Chapter 2
28
technologies, Germany) by the heat-shock methods described by Sambrook (1989).
Pre-thawed competent cells were mixed with the 2 μL of ligation mixture and the
resulting mixture was kept on ice for 30 min. The tube containing the transformation
mixture was heat-shocked for 30-45 sec in a water bath at 42°C followed by
immediate incubation on ice for 2 min. One ml SOC medium was added into the tube
containing transformation mixture and incubated at 37°C and 150 rpm for one hour.
One hour following the incubation, the transformation mixture was harvested and
spread on Luria Bertani (LB) medium plates supplemented with ampicillin (100
μg/ml), 20 μL of X-Gal (50 mg/ml) and 100 μL IPTG (24 mg/ml). The spread plates
were incubated overnight at 37°C. White colonies were picked and confirmed for
transformation by plasmid isolation and colony PCR.
2.13. Plasmid isolation
From a freshly grown plate of E. coli (TOP10), a single colony was picked
using sterile 200 µL tip and mixed with PCR reaction mixture for colony PCR and
then put into sterilized 15 ml falcon tube containing 5 ml LB broth supplemented with
100 μg/ml ampicillin. The plasmid was isolated using GeneJETTM
Plasmid Miniprep
kit (Fermentas, Germany). According to the kit protocol, the culture was transferred
into 1.5 ml microcentrifuge tube and centrifuged at 13000 rpm for one minute to get a
cell pellet. The supernatant was decanted and the pellet was resuspended in 250 μL
resuspension solution and vortexed. 250 μL of lysis solution was added and mixed by
inverting the tube 4-6 times. The lysis reaction was impeded by adding 350 μL
neutralization solution, mixed well and pelleted at 13000 rpm for 5 min. The
supernatant was transferred to a GeneJETTM
spin column and centrifuged at 13000
rpm for one minute. The column membrane was washed through by adding 500 μL
wash solution followed by centrifugation at 13000 rpm for 30-60 sec. Flow-through
was discarded and washing step was repeated one more time. The column was shifted
to a fresh 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube followed by the addition of 50 μL Elution buffer. The
plasmid was eluted by centrifugation at 13000 rpm for 2 min and stored at -20°C.
Materials and Methods Chapter 2
29
2.14. Digestion of plasmid DNA
For the confirmation of clone the isolated plasmid was digested with restriction
enzymes (Fermentas) along with their relevant buffers as per manufacturer's
instructions. Total reaction volume was 10 μL containing 100-500 ng plasmid DNA, 3
U restriction enzyme, restriction enzyme buffer and ddH2O. The mixture was
incubated at 37°C for 1-3 h and DNA fragment sizes were determined on 1% agarose
gel using standard DNA markers.
2.15. Agarose gel electrophoresis
The digested or amplified PCR product was analysed on 1.0-3.0% (depending
on PCR product fragment size) agarose gel stained with ethidium bromide (100
μg/ml). PCR product mixed with 6X loading dye (bromophenol blue) from each
sample was loaded on the gel that was already submerged in running buffer (0.5X
TAE). Samples were electrophoresed for approximately 1-4 h at 60-100 volts and the
gel was visualized under UV transilluminator for analysis of the PCR results.
2.16. Stocks preparation of cell cultures
Cell cultures were preserved in filter sterilized 30% glycerol and stored at -
80°C or liquid nitrogen (-196°C).
2.17. Sequencing
Bidirectional sequencing was performed for the purified PCR product, plasmid
containing fragment or gene. The 6 µL sequencing reaction consisted of 5pmol gene
specific or vector specific forward or reverse primer, 30 ng PCR product or 140 ng of
plasmid. The reaction mixture was run on DNA analyzer (Applied Biosystems, USA)
and the generated sequences were analysed through DNASTAR (DNASTAR, Inc) and
Sequencher® 5.0 software‟s (Gene Codes Corporation).
Materials and Methods Chapter 2
30
Table 2.1 Helicoverpa armigera collected from different geographical regions of the world
Strain Location Date of collection Behavior
FSD1 Faisalabad, Pakistan March, 2011 Resistant
TWBR*2 Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia January, 2003 Resistant
TWBS*2 Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia January, 2003 Susceptible
*Both strains were provided by Dr. Nicole Joussen at Department of Entomology, Max
Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany.
1FSD strain of was collected in March 2011 from chick pea grown fields in Faisalabad,
Pakistan and maintaned in lab since then.
2The TWB strain was collected from the vicinity of Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia in
January 2003 and maintained in the laboratory in Jena since August 2004.
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
31
Chapter 3
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of
cypermethrin resistance gene in Helicoverpa armigera
3.1. Introduction
Ever since the introduction of chemical insecticide for pest control, human
health and agriculture production have been improved. Although the use of
insecticides has greatly limited many major pests but this man-made natural selection
pressure results in the development of resistance in susceptible pest (Thacker, 2002).
Heckel (2012) defined resistance as “the heritable decline in a population‟s
susceptibility to a toxin (insecticide) to which it is exposed over successive
generations”. Thus evolution of insecticides resistance is the outcome of natural
selection (Heckel, 2012). Arthropods are known to be among the most difficult pests
to regulate chemically (Thacker, 2002). According to arthropods resistance database,
there are 7747 registered cases of resistance out of which 553 arthropod pests have
developed insecticides resistance due to the intense indiscriminate use of pesticides
(Devine, 2009). Order Lepidoptera, includes several of the world major crop pests,
such as spodoptera littoralis, Heliothis virescens and Helicoverpa armigera, which are
among the top twenty most resistant pests. It is important to understand pest
demography in order to understand these destructive pests ecology (Devine, 2009;
Mitter et al., 1993).
As mentioned earlier, H. armigera, is an economically important and a highly
polyphagous agricultural pest (Fitt, 1989). H. armigera is known as a master in
developing insecticides resistance and remained in focus as an important pest of
agricultural cash crops; almost 30% of total pesticides worldwide are used for its
control (Ahmad, 2007). H. armigera has developed resistance to a wide array of
insecticidal chemistries (48 compounds), with 671 registered cases. In addition, this
insect has evolved cross resistance to multiple pesticides; including organophosphates,
carbamates, organochlorines and pyrethroids (Whalon et al., 2013). Early detection
studies of insecticide resistance showed, in Australia, H. armigera evolved resistance
against DDT in early 1970s, followed by carbamate and organophosphate resistance
(Gunning et al., 1991). Due to the failure of DDT in controlling H. armigera, farmers
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
32
adopted a newer chemistry (pyrethroids) to control this notorious pest. However,
pyrethroid resistance in H. armigera was also reported in 1983 which was largely due
to the similarity in mechanism of action of DDT and pyrethroids (Ahmad, 2007).
Since then, H. armigera has developed resistance to a number of pyrethroids
(deltamethin, cypermethrin and fenvalerate) across Australia, Asia and Africa. H.
armigera is considered to be susceptible to organophosphates but a highest level of
endosulfan resistance (163-fold) was recorded in Australia in 1984 (Gunning et al.,
1998). In Asia, low to moderate levels of resistance to organophosphates has been
reported; high to low resistance to monocrotophos and chlorpyriphos has been
documented from Pakistan (Ahmad et al., 1995; McCaffery, 1998). Similarly, a
significant level of resistance to carbamate insecticides (methomyl and thiodicarb) has
been reported from Australia, China and India. However, in Pakistan resistance to
thiodicarb is at low level. In addition to chemical insecticides, H. armigera has
evolved resistance against biological insecticides (Spinosad and B. thuringiensis
derived toxins) which are used in the form of transgenic crops (Aheer et al., 2009;
Zhang et al., 2011).
Insecticide resistance is a genetic phenomenon and H. armigera has evolved
single or a combination of different resistance mechanisms against insecticides;
including behavioural change (avoidance), reduced cuticular penetration (changes in
the insect‟s cuticle or gut lining), mutation in the targets site (mutations in the sodium
channel, acetylcholinesterase and GABA receptor genes) of insecticides and enhanced
metabolic detoxification (alterations in the levels or activities of detoxification
proteins including Glutathione S-transferase, Carboxylesterase; Cytochrome P450
monooxygenase) (Ffrench-Constant, 2007; Hemingway et al., 2004; Li et al., 2007).
The behavioural resistance remains controversial due to the lack of evidence
supporting its role in resistance. However, reduced cuticular penetration appears to be
an additional feature in pyrethroid resistance mechanism, which has been confirmed in
H. armigera through in vivo and in vitro studies (Ahmad and McCaffery, 1999;
Gunning et al., 1995). The role of target site insensitivity (Kdr and super-Kdr) in
pyrethroid resistance has been reported from Asia and Australia (Ahmad et al., 1989;
Gunning et al., 1991) but reports indicated that reduction in pyrethroids selection
pressure is responsible for the replacement of pyrethroid resistance mechanisms from
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
33
nerve insensitivity to metabolic form of resistance (Forrester et al., 1993; Gunning et
al., 1991). Metabolic enzyme Cytochrome-P450 monooxygenases (P450) have been
documented to be the major factor in pyrethroid resistance in H. armigera from
Australia, China, India and Pakistan (Heckel et al., 1998; Joussen et al., 2012; Yang et
al., 2004). However, some studies indicate the involvement of esterases and
Glutathione S-transferase enzymes in pyrethroid resistance strain from Pakistan and
India (Ahmad, 2004; Kranthi et al., 1997; Kranthi et al., 2001). The involvement of a
particular individual or multiple P450 genes is under debate for the last two decade.
CYP6B2, CYP6B6, and CYP6B7 were the early genes to be isolated and sequenced
from pyrethroid resistant strain (Ranasinghe and Hobbs, 1998; Xiao-Ping and Hobbs,
1995), followed by CYP9A12, CYP9A14, CYP6B7 and CYP4G8 which were found to
be linked with pyrethroid resistance in China (Yang et al., 2006). However, the
presence of CYP6B7 on different linkage group (LG 14) as compared to the linkage
group 13 harboring resistant loci RFen1, results in elimination of its role in pyrethroid
resistance (Grubor and Heckel, 2007). Recent studies have shown that in Australian
pyrethroid resistant strain ANO2, CYP337b1 was found to be tightly linked to the
resistant locus RFen1, suggesting that this P450 may be responsible in fenvalerate
(pyrethroid) resistance (Wee et al., 2008). Similarly in 2012, a new chimeric gene
CYP337B3 was found which resulted from an unequal crossing over between two
parental genes, CYP337B1 and CYP337B2, explored the role of CYP337B1 in another
Australian fenvalerate resistant strain, TWB (Joussen et al., 2012).
Being a notorious pest and threat to agricultural crops, better knowledge of the
genetic basis of resistance in H. armigera is important for its control. Although a lot of
work has been done on its diversity, behaviour and toxicity against chemical and
biological insecticides. Still little is known about molecular mechanism of insecticide
resistance and involvement of particular gene involved in resistance is still questions
that need to be answered. Hence, there is a need to identify genes which have evolved
resistance against insecticide. In lepidoptera little is known about the genetics of most
of the species from this group due to difficulty in linkage detection, large number of
chromosomes and requirement of abundant markers (Heckel et al., 1999). In
lepidopteran insects the arrangement of the genes on chromosomes appears to be
highly conserved (Yasukochi et al., 2009) and the haploid number of chromosomes is
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
34
considered to be 31 in one fourth of its species (Robinson, 1971). Moreover, recently,
karyotype analysis confirmed 31 chromosome hypothesis of lepidoptera in H.
armigera, using fluoresce in situ hybridization technique (Sahara et al., 2013). DNA
markers are suitable for identification of resistance mechanism and genes involved in
insecticide resistance and have been used for genetic linkage mapping (Heckel et al.,
1997). But still there is the limitation of absence of complete genome sequence of H.
armigera genome and genetic markers which could cover its entire genome. This
limitation can be overcome by exploiting the biphasic nature of genetic linkage found
in lepidoptera for mapping genes involved in resistance (Heckel et al., 1999;
Robinson, 1971; Suomalainen et al., 1973). This phenomenon has been exploited
using amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) markers (Vos et al., 1995) for
detection of Bt and insecticide resistance genes in H. armigera (Heckel, 2003; Wee et
al., 2008). AFLPs are ideal DNA markers which generate more number of
reproducible and stable markers (50-100 bands per primer pair) than RAPD and do not
require prior knowledge of DNA sequence (Behura, 2006; Jonah et al., 2011). AFLPs
generally have co-dominant mode of inheritance in nature but some time dominant
AFLPs are also amplified (Behura, 2006). Moreover, cDNA AFLP has been used for
expression profiling of differentially expressed genes in H. armigera (Wee et al.,
2008). Similarly AFLP based linkage maps for several agricultural pest; including L.
decemlineata, P. xylostella and H. armigera are used to find out the loci (gene)
conferring resistance to chemical and biological (Bt) resistance in agriculture pest
(Heckel, 2003).
In the current study, AFLP based approach was used by exploiting the lack of
crossing-over in H. armigera for mapping resistance gene present in FSD strain which
is responsible for cypermethrin resistance. Moreover, the insecticide (cypermethrin)
resistant gene was identified, isolated and overexpressed in insects cell line (Ha2302)
to confirm its metabolic activity against cypermethrin in vitro.
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
35
3.2. Materials and Methods
3.2.1. H. armigera strains and genetic crosses
The larvae of Asian resistant strain (FSD) were collected in March 2011 from
chick pea grown fields in Faisalabad, Pakistan, where cotton and chick pea are
cultivated in rotation and multiple rounds of insecticidal sprays are applied for pest
control. The larvae were reared on pinto bean diet at 26°C and 55% RH with a 16:08
(L:D) photoperiod. The Australian susceptible strain (TWBS) were used in this study
as described by Joussen et al., (2012) and maintained in the laboratory on Bio-Serv
diet (General Purpose Lepidoptera) at 26°C and 55% humidity with a 16:08 (L:D)
photoperiod. The FSD line was maintained through mass rearing; 10 pairs in a single
cross while the TWBR and TWBS lines were maintained through single-pair crosses.
To generate informative families for genetic mapping study, the Pakistani
pyrethroid resistant strain FSD was crossed with Australian pyrethroid susceptible
strain TWBS. The F1 male and female were backcrossed to susceptible strain, TWBS.
The individuals were placed in environmental chambers at 26 ± 1°C, 55% RH, with a
photoperiod of 16:08 (L:D) and were reared individually in plastic cups containing
pinto bean diet.
3.2.2. Toxicological tests
Resistance levels of H. armigera strains were determined by screening through
the technical grade cypermethrin (mixture of isomers, purity 95.1%, Sigma-Aldrich,
Germany). Different concentrations of cypermethrin (25 ng to 2000 ng) were prepared
in acetone to treat the test larvae. For each dose from resistant strain FSD, susceptible
strain TWBS and F1 population (TWBS x FSD) 30-40 3rd instar healthy larvae (20-30
mg) were selected. While in case of backcross population, 100 and 50, 3rd instar
healthy from male informative backcross (MIBC) and female informative backcross
(FIBC) respectively, were selected and treated with a discriminating dose (400 ng).
Toxicity test treatments were performed by applying 1µL of the test material to the
larval thorax using Hamilton syringe. To determine the resistance mechanism of the
Pakistani strain, FSD larvae were treated with piperonyl butoxide, a known P450 and
carboxylesterase inhibitor, prior to cypermethrin treatment. Each larva was exposed
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
36
to1 µL of PBO (30 mM) for 2 h prior to the application of cypermethrin. Larval
mortality was recorded after 48 h of the treatment. The mortality was observed on the
basis of criteria proposed by Joussen et al., (2012). The LD50 values were calculated
by Probit analysis using SPSS Statistics version 17.0 software.
3.2.3. Nucleic acid isolation
Nucleic acid was isolated using methods in Wee et al., (2008) with some
modification from killed, survived and untreated larvae. Whole larva was ground to
fine powder in liquid nitrogen, using pestle and mortar. The powdered form of larva
was transferred to 1.5 ml Eppendorf tube containing 600 µL nucleic acid isolation
buffer (50 mM Tris-HCL, pH 8.5, 0.1 N NaCl, 1 mM DTT, 10 mM EDTA and 0.2%
SDS) and immediately mixed with 400 µL TE-equilibrated phenol (pH 8.0), vortexed
vigorously and place on ice. The mixture was centrifuged (Micocentrifuge, Eppendorf:
Germany) at 13,000 rpm for 5 min at room temperature. The aqueous phase was
carefully transferred to fresh tube and extracted two more time with phenol. Then the
sample was divided into two parts; 2/3 was used for RNA extraction while the
remaining 1/3 was used for DNA extraction.
For DNA extraction, the separated 1/3 portion of the extracted sample was
treated with RNaseA (3 µL of 10 mg/ml) and incubated for 2 h at 37°C. Chloroform
(400 µL) was added, mixed vigorously and centrifuged at 13,000 rpm
(Micocentrifuge, Eppendorf: Germany) for 5 min at room temperature. The
supernatant was transferred into fresh tube and pre-chilled 100% ethanol (800 µL) was
added and mixed gently. The mixture was allowed to precipitate for 2 h at -20°C and
was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm (Micocentrifuge, Eppendorf: Germany) for 20 min at
4°C, supernatant was carefully decanted to avoid losing of pellet. Pellet was washed
by adding 200 µL ethanol (70%) and was centrifuged at 13,000 rpm (Micocentrifuge,
Eppendorf: Germany) for 10 min at 4°C. Supernatant was carefully decanted and the
last drops of ethanol were removed with a pipet. Pellet was air dried for approximately
30 min at room temperature and re-suspended in 100 µL nuclease free water and
stored at -20°C.
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
37
For RNA extraction the sample was mixed with 0.5 ml isopropyl alcohol and
incubated for 10 min at room temperature before centrifugation for 10 min at 13000
rpm and 4°C. After centrifugation the supernatant was decanted and the pellet was
washed with 1 ml ethanol (75%) by vortexing. Finally tubes were centrifuged for 5
min at 9000 rpm at 4°C. Ethanol was removed and RNA pellet was allowed to air dry
for 5-10 min. RNA was dissolved in 100 μL of diethylpyrocarbonate (DEPC) treated
water and was stored at -80°C. The RNA was purified from contaminated DNA
through method described earlier (section 2.6).
3.2.4. AFLP linkage mapping
AFLP polymorphism was performed using Vos et al., (1995) and Kaiser and Heckle
(2012) protocols with some modifications.
3.2.4.1. Restriction digestion
For AFLP restriction digestion, genomic DNA was digested using restriction
enzymes in their respective buffer following manufactures (New England, BioLabs®
Inc) guidelines. A total volume of 25 µL reaction was comprised of 200 ng of genomic
DNA, 6 U of EcoRI (NEB), 3 U of Mse1 (NEB) and 1.25 µL of 10X NEB buffers # 2
(with 100 µg/ml BSA). The final volume of reaction mixture was adjusted with
ddH2O. The restriction mixture was mixed gently, centrifuged briefly and incubated at
37°C for 2 h followed by the inactivation of restriction enzyme by incubating at 65°C
for 15 min.
3.2.4.2. Adaptor ligation
The 25 µL ligation reaction comprised of 12.5 µL of restricted DNA from the
previous step, 200 U T4 DNA ligase (NEB), 2.5 µL 10X T4 DNA ligase buffer
(NEB), 5 pmole Eco- adapter and 50 pmole Mse- adaptor. The final volume was
adjusted with ddH2O and was incubated in a ligation chamber at 16°C for 2 h. At the
end of ligation period, enzymes were subsequently inactivated by incubating at 65°C
for 15 min.
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
38
3.2.4.3. Pre-amplification
The end product of adapter ligation was diluted ten times. Diluted ligation (2
µL) was mixed with 8 µL PCR mix (1 µL 10X PCR-buffer, 15 mM MgCl2, EcoRI and
MseI primers (5 pmol each, Table 3.1), 2 mM dNTPs, and 1 U Taq DNA
polymerases). The reaction mixture was incubated (20 cycles: 30 sec at 94°C, 1 min at
56°C, 1 min at 72°C) in thermal cycler (Eppendorf). The amplified PCR product (2
µL) was analysed on 1% agarose gel as described earlier (section 2.15). The pre-
amplified DNA was diluted fifty times for future selective amplifications and stored at
-20°C.
3.2.4.4. Selective amplification
For selective amplification the 2 µL of the diluted pre-amplified DNA was
used as template. The 11 µL selective amplification reaction mixture was comprised of
1.1 µL 10X PCR buffer, 15 mM MgCl2, primers (MseI, IRDye 700 labeled EcoRI,
IRDye 700 unlabeled EcoRI, IRDye 800 labeled EcoRI, IRDye 800 unlabeled EcoRI)
1 pmole each, 2.5 mM dNTPs, 0.5 U Taq Polymerases and 2 µL template. The final
volume was adjusted with ddH2O. The reaction mixture was incubated for 12 cycles at
94°C for 10 sec, 65°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 1 min, followed by 23 cycles at 94°C
for 10 sec, 56°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 1 min, in thermal cycler (Eppendorf).
Different primer combinations were used for selective amplification. At the end 10 µL
sterile water and 15 µL licor stop solution (1 mM EDTA, 1 ng/ml bromophenole blue
and 85% formamide) was added to the selectively amplified product.
3.2.4.5. Gel separation
Selectively amplified samples were separated depending on fragment size on
8% polyacrylamide gel using DNA analyser system, LI-COR 4200 sequencer (LI-
COR Biosciences-GmbH). The samples (0.8 µL each) were loaded into 96 wells using
Hamilton 8-channel syringe (Hamilton, Bonaduz/Switzerland). In the first ten wells
(1-10) grandparents were loaded, F1 MIBC parents were loaded into wells 11-12 and
43-44 while F1 FIBC parents were loaded into 45-46 and 95-96. LI-COR STR marker
(50-700 bp) was used as DNA sizing standard and was loaded into wells 1–2 and 99–
100. The gel was run for 3.5 h and the image was developed through scanning laser
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
39
(detect infrared labelled DNA fragments of 700 nm and 800 nm). The generated gel
picture was saved as a tiff file.
3.2.4.6. AFLP markers scoring on gel
The gel scoring was done through semiautomatic image analysis software
Quantar 1.08 (KeyGene Products, Netherlands). This software is specifically designed
for AFLP study. The AFLP markers (fragment bands) of interest in backcrosses were
those that were present in FSD original parents and F1 (male and female). Presence of
band was considered heterozygous genotype while absence of band was considered
homozygous recessive genotypes as they are segregating 1 1. For MIBC the band
present FSD original parents (Male) and the F1 male, but were not present in the
TWBS original parents or recurrent TWBS backcross parent. Similarly for FIBC the
band present FSD original parents (Male) and the F1 female, but were not present in
the TWBS original parents or recurrent TWBS backcross parent.
3.2.4.7. Inference of resistant genotypes through PCR
Genetic map constructed by Wee et al., (2008) using cDNA-AFLPs for
mapping of pyrethroid resistance gene in Australian H. armigera, has shown that
CYP337B1 gene is tightly linked with resistance loci RFen1 on linkage group 13.
However, more recently Joussen et al., (2012) reported a new chimeric gene
CYP337B3 responsible for fenvalerate resistance in H. armigera and this gene was the
outcome of unequal crossing over between two susceptible genes CYP337B1 and
CYP337B2. Thus CYP337B3 was assumed as a candidate gene for resistance in
pyrethroid resistant strain FSD and was used to infer the resistant genotype in both
MIBC and FIBC killed and survived larvae of toxicity test used in AFLP. Amplicons
of 847 bp fragment size of CYP337B3 was generated through PCR (section 2.9) using
gene specific primers (Table 3.1).
3.2.4.8. Exon primed intron crossing PCR (EPIC-PCR)
For fine scale mapping of resistant gene exon primed intron crossing (EPIC)
primers, designed from adjacent exon sequences which flank intron. EPIC-PCR
primers were designed for four ribosomal protein genes (m14-FLX, RPL10A, RPL8
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
40
and RPS23) from Australian H. armigera (TWB) strain cDNA library in-house
database at Department of Entomology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology,
Jena, Germany (Table 3.1). The intron positions were predicted from the introns in B.
mori, and these intron positions are highly conserved across lepidoptera. It had been
reported that these ribosomal protein genes are located on linkage group 15 and 2 of B.
mori and H. virescens, respectively. It was assumed that they would also be on the
same order in H. armigera.
3.2.4.9. Data analysis
The obtained markers of AFLP, CYP337B3 gene and ribosomal protein genes
(m14-FLX, RPL10A, RPL8 and RPS23) were analysed to determine the number of
linkage groups and to map resistance gene within a linkage group using MAPMAKER
3.0 software. Exploiting the lack of crossing-over during oogenesis in lepidopteran
female a sequential approach was used (Heckel et al., 1999; Robinson, 1971;
Suomalainen et al., 1973). First, absolute linkage in progeny of FIMB was used to find
out the linkage group involved in resistance. Secondly, to use the recombinants of
MIBC progeny to identify the location of resistant genes on linkage group contributing
to resistance. The segregation of FIBC AFLPs was verified and correlated with
mortality data (dead and survived larvae) of cypermethrin toxicity test and linkage
relationship among AFLPs, CYP337B3 and ribosomal protein genes markers by
mapping them on linkage group contributing to resistance.
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
41
Table 3.1 Primers for screening of CYP337B1, CYP337B2, CYP337B3, for detection of
CYP337B3 in the AFLP analysis, for cloning of CYP337B3 and the intron region and for the
ribosomal protein genes
Gene Forward primer (5'-3') Reverse primer (5'-3')
Screening
CYP337B1 AATAATAAGCAACGCCAATGACTTAC TGCAATAACAACTATTACATTTTGAATAAA
CYP337B2 AATAATAACCAGTCCAAACGATGTGT CGCAATTATAGTCACTATGATTGCATATA
CYP337B3 AATAATAACCAGTCCAAACGATGTGT TGCAATAACAACTATTACATTTTGAATAAA
AFLP
CYP337B3 CGATGCCAGAACTAATCAAATCG TCAATTTCCTCATGTAGTTTTGCC
Cloning
CYP337B3 CACGATGGTGTTCGTAATATTACTC GATTTATATGTCTCTTAACTTTAATTCATAACC
Intron
CYP337B3 AATAATGATTCCAGTGTTCGGTCTT AAGGTAAAACGACGTAACAGCCA
Ribosomal genes
RPS23 AAAGAAGGAAAGGCCACGTT ACAACACAGCTTTGCAGCAG
RPL8 ACTTCCGTGACCCGTACAAG AGGATTGTGGCCGATAACAG
RPL10A CGCTGAGGCACTCAAGAAA GAGGGATTCTGATGCAAGGA
m14_FLX ATCTCGCCTGGATCAACACT GATGTTCATCGGACCCAGAC
AFLP Pre-amplification
EcoRI 5′-GACTGCGTACCAATTC-3′
MseI 5′-GATGAGTCCTGAGTAA-3′
RACE-PCR
3ʹRACE 5ʹ-CGACGTCGGCGACAATACCAACG -3ʹ
5ʹRACE 5ʹ-TCAGTTCGTCGGTCGGCTCCAA-3ʹ
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
42
3.2.5. Isolation, cloning, overexpression and characterization of CYP337B3 gene
3.2.5.1. DNA and RNA extraction
Genomic DNA and total RNA was extracted as described earlier in section 2.4
and 2.5 respectively.
3.2.5.2. PCR amplification, cloning and sequencing CYP337B3 gene
fragment
The CYP337B3 (accession no. JQ995292) was amplified using gene specific
primers (Table 3.1). The PCR product was purified using MinElute PCR Purification
Kit (Qiagen, Germany) and cloned in pGEM®-T vector systems (Promega, USA). The
presence of the insert in plasmid was checked through restriction analysis after
transformation of TOP10 E. coli cells (Invitrogen) and plasmid isolation using
GeneJETTM Plasmid Miniprep kit (Fermentas). Sequence of the DNA fragment was
determined after sequencing.
3.2.5.3. Rapid amplification of cDNA ends (RACE) PCR
The 3ʹ and 5ʹ RACE PCR was performed using SMARTer™ RACE cDNA
Amplification Kit First Choice RLM-RACE Kit (Clontech) according to the
manufacturer's instructions. Prior to performing 5ʹ- and 3ʹ-RACE reactions, RACE
ready first-strand cDNA was synthesized. cDNA synthesis reaction comprised of two
reaction mixtures. The first reaction mixture (5.25 µL) consisted of 2.0 μL 5X First-
Strand buffer, 1.0 μL DTT (20 mM), 1.0 μL dNTP Mix (10 mM), 0.25 μL RNase
Inhibitor (40 U/μL) and 1.0 μL SMARTScribe Reverse Transcriptase (100 U). The
second reaction mixture (4.75 μL) consisted of 1.0 μL RNA (1 μg), 1.0 μL 5'-CDS
Primer A and 2.75 μL ddH20) for 5'-RACE-Ready cDNA. While in the case of 3'-
RACE-Ready, cDNA reaction mixture (3.75 μL) consisted of 1.0 μL RNA (1 μg), 1.0
μL 5'-CDS Primer A and 1.75 μL ddH20 mixed and prepared in individual tube.
Further 1 μL of the SMARTer IIA oligo per reaction was added to 5' RACE cDNA
synthesis reaction. The second reaction mixtures (3'- and 5'-RACE-Ready cDNA)
were incubated for 3 min at 72°C to denature RNA and were kept on ice for 2 min
before mixing it with 5.25 µL of first reaction mixture. The final 10 µL reaction
mixtures were incubated at 42°C for 60 min, 50°C for 90 min and 70°C for 10 min
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
43
using a hot-lid thermal cycler. At the end 100 µL Tricine-EDTA buffer was added to
dilute the first-strand reaction product and stored at -20°C.
The 3ʹ- and 5ʹ-RACE-ready cDNA samples were used for RACE PCR reaction
to get full-length cDNA. RACE-PCR reaction mixture (25 μL) contained 18.05 μL
PCR-grade water, 2.5 μL 10X advantage 2PCR buffer, 1 μL dNTP Mix (10 mM), 1.25
μL 3ʹ- or 5ʹ-RACE-Ready cDNA, 2.5 μL universal primer mix (UPM) and 10 μM
gene specific primer (Table 3.1). The RACE-PCR reaction mixture was incubated in
master cycler (Eppendorf), programmed for preheat treatment of 95°C for 1 min
followed by 5 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec and 68°C for 3 min; 5 cycles of 95°C for 30
sec, 66°C for 30 sec and 68°C for 3 min; 25 cycles of 95°C for 30 sec, 64°C for 30 sec
and 68°C for 3 min followed final incubation at 68°C for 10 min. Each sample was
analysed on 1% agarose/EtBr gel.
3.2.5.4. Cloning and sequencing of RACE PCR products
PCR products were purified using a MinElute PCR Purification Kit (Qiagen,
Germany) and were cloned into TOPO TA cloning vector (Invitrogen), according to
the manufacturer's instructions. The ligation mixture consisted of fresh PCR product 1
μL, Salt Solution 1 μL, TOPO® vector 0.4 μL and 3.6 μL ddH2O. The reaction was
incubated at room temperature for 20 min. The ligation mixture was transformed into
TOP10 competent cells (E. coli) by using heat shock transformation method as
described earlier (section 2.12), only with the exception of blue/white selection
through X-Gal and IPTG. For the confirmation of insert 5 colonies were picked for
colony PCR from each cloning reaction. After confirmation of insert, plasmid was
isolated using GeneJETTM Plasmid Miniprep kit (Fermentas) from relevant clone
already cultured in LB broth media at 37°C for 16 h. The sequences of the clones were
determined after sequencing.
3.2.5.5. CYP337B3 cloning and characterisation of the intron
Gene-specific primers were used for CYP337B3 gene based on 3ʹ and 5ʹ RACE
PCR products sequences. The forward primer had a 5'-Kozak sequence while two
reverse primers were designed, one of them lacking the stop codon for V5 epitope and
His-tag fusion expression after ligation into the vector pIB/V5-His TOPO® TA
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
44
(Invitrogen) and the other primer was incorporated with stop codon resulting in
untagged proteins (Table 3.1). The gene was amplified using AccuPrime™ Taq DNA
Polymerase High Fidelity (Invitrogen). The 25 µL PCR reaction contained 100 ng
cDNA, 2.5 µL 10X AccuPrime™ PCR buffer, 0.5 µL each gene-specific primer (10
µM), 1 U AccuPrime™ Taq High Fidelity. PCR reaction mixture was incubated in
Thermo Cycler (Eppendorf) at 94°C for 2 min followed by 35 cycles of 94°C for 30
sec, 55°C for 30 sec and 72°C for 45 sec, followed by final extension at 72°C for 5
min. Resulting PCR product was analysed on 1% agarose/EtBr by agarose gel
electrophoresis.
The purified PCR product was ligated in pIB/V5-His-TOPO® vector (Figure
3.1) for expression in Lepidopteran insect cell line using pIB/V5-His TOPO®
TA
Expression Kit (Invitrogen). The 3 µL ligation mixture consisted of 1 μL PCR
product, 0.5 μL salt solution, 0.4 μL TOPO® vector and 1.1 μL ddH2O. The reaction
was incubated at room temperature for 20 min. Correct orientation of the insert was
checked by colony PCR after transformation of TOP10 E. coli cells using vector and
gene-specific primers (Table 3.1). Correct plasmids for transfection of Ha2302 cells
were determined by sequencing. The intron region of CYP337B3 was amplified from
genomic DNA using intron spanning primers (Table 3.1), gel purification and
sequenced.
3.2.5.6. Insect cell culture (Ha2302)
Ha2302 cells derived from hemolymph of 2nd
and 3rd
instar larvae from H.
armigera were available at Department of Entomology, Max Planck Institute for
Chemical Ecology, Jena, Germany. Cells were maintained on Sf-900™ II serum-free
medium (Invitrogen) and were cultivated as adherent cells at 27°C. The cell culture
was used for expression of CYP337B3 gene.
3.2.5.7. Heterologous expression of CYP337B3 gene in Ha2302 Cells
Transfection of the adherent insect cell line Ha2302 was performed as
described by Joussen et al., (2012). Confluent Ha2302 cells in 75cm2 flask were
detached and diluted 1:3 using Sf-900™ II SF medium (Invitrogen). 3 ml of diluted
cells were added in wells of a 6-well cell culture plate (one well per construct) and
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
45
incubated at 27°C for 1 h. For transfection, 1.8 µg of expression construct plasmid
DNA was diluted in 90 µL of SF medium per well and was added drop wise to 9 µL of
Insect GeneJuice® Transfection Reagent (Novagen) diluted with 90 µL of SF medium.
Transfection mixtures were immediately vortexed and further 720 µL of SF medium
was added to the transfection mixture after incubation for 15 min at room temperature.
Medium of the Ha2302 cells in the 6-wells plate was replaced by transfection mixture
and incubated at 27°C for 4 h. Transfection mixture was replaced by fresh 3 ml SF
medium containing 50µg ml-1
Gentamycin and was incubated at 27°C for 48 h. For the
selection of transformed cells medium was replaced by medium containing 50 µg ml-1
Gentamycin and 60 µg ml-1
of blasticidin. The cell growth and confluency under
selection pressure was observed for 5 days, while keeping the condition optimum by
replacing the medium after every 2 to 4 days. The transformed cell culture was
expanded by transferring it to 75 cm2
flasks for microsome isolation and
cryopreservation.
Microsomes were isolated from CYP337B3-transgenic and non-transgenic
Ha2302 cells using the method described by Joussen et al., (2012). Both cytosolic and
microsomal fractions were stored at -80°C. Protein content was determined by the
Bradford method (Bradford, 1976) using the Quick Start Bradford Protein Assay (Bio-
Rad). Additionally, the pellets containing the nuclei were snap frozen for isolation of
genomic DNA.
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
46
Figure 3.1 pIB/V5-His-TOPO® expression vector, used for cloning of CYP337B3
gene isolated from Helicoverpa armigera strain FSD and transformation into insect
cell line Ha2302.
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
47
3.2.5.8. Microsomal and cytosolic fractions isolation from Ha2302 Cells
Microsomes were isolated from CYP337B3-transgenic and non-transgenic
Ha2302 cells using the method described by Joussen et al., (2012). Confluent cells
were separated from their culture medium by centrifugation for 10 min at 500 g and
4°C and then washed two times with ice-cold PBS, pH 7.4. Cells were resuspended
and incubated on ice for 20 min in 3 ml hypotonic buffer (20 mM Tris, 5 mM EDTA,
1 mM DTT, 20% (v/v) glycerol, pH 7.5, 1X protease inhibitors; Protease Inhibitor
Cocktail Set III, Animal-Free, Calbiochem®
, Merck) followed by homogenization
using the Potter-Elvehjem tissue grinder (Wheaton). After homogenisation an equal
volume of sucrose buffer (20 mM Tris, 5 mM EDTA, 1 mM DTT, 500 mM sucrose,
20% (v/v) glycerol, pH 7.5, 1X protease inhibitors) was added to the lyzed cells and
centrifuged for 10 min at 1200 g and 4°C. The supernatants were pooled in fresh 50 ml
falcon and the homogenization step with pellet was repeated. After a second
homogenization step supernatants were pooled and centrifuged for 15 min at 10000 g
and 4°C using Beckman centrifuge machine (Beckman Coulter). Pellet was snap
frozen for isolation of genomic DNA and supernatant was further centrifuged for 1 h
at 38,000 rpm and 4°C. Supernatant consisting of cytosolic fraction was snap frozen
and pellet consisting of microsomal fraction was resuspended in resuspension buffer
(0.1 M potassium phosphate buffer, pH 7.4, 20% (v/v) glycerol, 1X protease
inhibitors) using Potter-Elvehjem tissue grinder and centrifuged again for 1 h at
48,000 rpm and 4°C. Supernatant was discarded and the pellet was resuspended again
in resuspension buffer and was snap frozen for storage. Both cytosolic and microsomal
isolated proteins were stored at -80°C.
3.2.5.9. Determination of protein content
Protein content in isolated microsomal and cytosolic protein was determined
by Bradford method using the Quick Start™ Bradford Protein Assay (Bio-Rad). The
samples were diluted 10 times and 20 times in resuspension buffer and the assay was
performed using a 300 μL microplate. Bovine serum albumin (BSA) was used as
standard; the standard curve was prepared by adding 2, 1.5, 1, 0.75, 0.5, 0.25, 0.125
mg/ml of standard (provided by manufacture) in each well containing 150 μL of
Bradford reagent. For samples, to 150 μL of Bradford reagent, 150 μL of protein
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
48
sample or standard was added and incubated for 5 min at room temperature. Bradford
reagent (150 μL) mixed with 150 μL of resuspension buffer was used as blank. The
absorbance (OD) was determind at 595 nm using Infinite 200®
PRO (Tecan)
microplate reader and readings were plotted for quantification of total protein. Protein
samples and standard were assayed in triplicates.
3.2.5.10. DNA extraction from Ha2302 cells and screening by PCR
Genomic DNA of CYP337B3-transgenic Ha2302 cells was extracted from the
nucleus fraction using the method described by Joussen et al., (2012). Cells/ nucleus
fraction was homogenized in 400 µL of homogenization buffer (0.4 M NaCl, 10 mM
Tris, 2 mM EDTA, pH 8.0) for 10 to 15 sec with 2% final concentration of SDS and
7.2 mAnsonU proteinase K and incubated at 60°C for 1 h. Before centrifugation at
13000 rpm for 30 min, 300 µL of 6 M NaCl solution was mixed with sample mixture
by vortexing for 30 sec. The supernatant was transferred to a fresh tube containing one
volume of ice cold isopropanol and incubated at -20°C over night. Samples were
centrifuged for 20 min at 13000 rpm and 4 ºC, DNA pellets were washed with 70%
ethanol, dried at room temperature and resuspended in ddH2O. The presence of
CYP337B3 gene in insect cell culture was confirmed by screening genomic DNA
through PCR using gene-specific primers (Table 3.1).
3.2.5.11. Stocks preparation of Ha2302 cells containing CYP337B3 gene
For storage purpose transformed Ha2302 cells were scratched in their old
culture medium and transferred to a 50 ml Falcon tube and centrifuged for 10 min at
400 g and 20°C. The pellet was dissolved in one microliter freezing mix (45% SF
medium containing 50 µg Gentamicin, 45% old culture medium and 10% DMSO) and
transferred to cryovial. All these steps were performed on ice. The cryovial was stored
for 4 h at -80°C followed by storage in liquid nitrogen.
3.2.5.12. SDS-PAGE and western-blot
Microsomal and cytosolic proteins (10 µg each) of CYP337B3-transgenic
Ha2302 cells were analysed by SDS-PAGE and western blot as described by Joussen
et al., (2012). Microsomal and cytosolic proteins (10 µg, each) of Ha2302 cells
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
49
containing CYP337B3 gene were mixed with 5 µL laemmli sample buffer (Bio-Rad).
Samples were denatured at 95°C for 5 min and kept for 2 min on ice. Denatured
samples were separated in a 10% polyacrylamide gel using the Criterion system (Bio-
Rad) with TGS buffer (25 mM Tris, 192 mM glycine, 0.1% (w/v) SDS) at 120 V for
2 h, using a molecular weight marker. Resolved protein from gel was transferred to
PVDF bloting membrane using a tank blotter with transfer buffer (TG buffer with 10%
methanol) at 100 V for 30 min. Gel was discarded and membrane was washed briefly
in distilled water. Memebrane was incubated for 1 h in blocking buffer (TBS with
0.1% Tween 20, 5% non-fat dry milk) with agitation followed by incubation with
Anti-V5-HRP antibody (1:10,000; Invitrogen) in blocking buffer at 4°C over night
with agitation. The membrane was washed two times with TBS with 0.1% Tween 20
and one time with TBS for 10 min prior to incubation with ECL solutions. The film
was exposed to the membrane followed by film development.
3.2.5.13. Activity assays with P450 model substrates
Three groups of model substrates, 7-alkoxyresorufins (7-methoxy-, 7-ethoxy-,
7-pentoxy-, and 7-benzyloxyresorufin), 7-alkoxycoumarins (7-methoxy- and 7-
ethoxycoumarin), and 3-cyano-7-alkoxycoumarins (3-cyano-7-methoxy- and 3-cyano-
7-ethoxycoumarin), were used to determine the functionality of heterologous
CYP337B3. Activity assays were performed and measured as described by Joussen et
al., (2012). For each activity assay 0.2mg of microsomal proteins derived from
transgenic and non-transgenic Ha2302 cells were incubated with 1nmol of substrate
(dissolved in 1 µL of DMSO) and an NADPH regeneration system at 30°C for 4 h.
Samples omitting microsomes were used as background controls and two to three
replicates were used per assay. For 7-alkoxycoumarins, the extraction procedure was
carried out as described by Joussen et al., (2012).
Calibration curves of the products resorufin (0, 1, 2. 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 50,
100, 150, 200, and 250pmol; dissolved in DMSO) and 3-cyano-7-hydroxycoumarin (0,
1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 pmol; dissolved in DMSO), respectively, were measured
in the relevant solvents using two replicates for each amount. Differing from the
procedure by Joussen et al., (2012), for the calibration curve of the product 7-
hydroxycoumarin, two replicates for each amount (0, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20,
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
50
and 30 pmol; dissolved in DMSO) were incubated in the reaction mixture with non-
transgenic microsomes and were extracted as described for the samples. The resulting
calibration curve includes losses due to handling of aliquots and extraction. The
analysis was performed as described by Joussen et al., (2012) with one modification in
the expression of the end result. Calibration curves were transformed by subtracting
the fluorescence intensity values received by 0 pmol of product (negative values were
set to zero) from all values. For the calculation of the metabolic activity of
CYP337B3, all negative values were set to zero and the mean of the background
control was subtracted from the values of all samples to produce the net-fluorescence
intensities. Furthermore, the mean of the samples performed with non-transgenic
Ha2302 microsomes was subtracted from the mean values of all samples. At the end,
resulting corrected net-fluorescence intensities were transformed in amounts of
product formed by CYP337B3 using the corresponding calibration curve and corrected
metabolic capacities were expressed as pmol product formed by 0.2 mg of microsomal
protein in 4 h.
3.2.5.14. In vitro metabolism assays with cypermethrin and analysis
through HPLC
To determine the capability of CYP337B3 to metabolize cypermethrin in vitro
assays were performed using the method described by Joussen et al., (2012).
Microsomal proteins (0.8 mg) derived from transgenic and non-transgenic Ha2302
cells were incubated individually in amber borosilicate glass vials with 4 nmol of
cypermethrin (mixture of isomers, purity 95.1%; PESTANAL, Sigma-Aldrich;
dissolved in 4 µL of DMSO), at 30°C for 4 h. Additionally, two inhibition assays were
performed: Firstly, piperonyl butoxide (purity: at least 90%, Fluka), a known P450
inhibitor, was used in an inhibition assay with 40 nmol per assay. Secondly, an
inhibition study with the absence of NADPH was performed by omitting the NADPH
regeneration system. Samples were extracted and residues were redissolved in 25 µL
of methanol and 375 µL of H2O:acetonitrile 50:50 (organic solvents of HPLC grade)
and filtered for HPLC. As a reference in HPLC analysis, a solution of 1 nmol
cypermethrin per 100 µL was used. HPLC analysis (100 µL per sample) was executed
on a Hewlett-Packard (Agilent) HPLC 1100 Series equipped with a C18 column (EC
250/4.6 Nucleodur®
Sphinx RP, 250×4.6 mm, 5 µm particle size; Macherey-Nagel) as
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
51
described in Joussen et al., (2012) using the same program. Cypermethrin and its
metabolites were analysed at 210 nm, 230 nm, and 275 nm.
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
52
3.3. Results
3.3.1. Cypermethrin resistance in the FSD strain is metabolic and
semidominant
To elucidate the cypermethrin resistance mechanism of H. armigera observed
in field populations in Pakistan, third-instar larvae from the Pakistani FSD strain were
treated with different doses of cypermethrin for comparison with the fenvalerate-
resistant TWBR line and the susceptible TWBS line from Australia (Figure 3.2).
Larvae of the FSD strain and TWBR line were 6.94- and 5.73-fold, respectively, more
resistant than the TWBS line (Table 3.2). Piperonyl butoxide treated larvae were more
sensitive to cypermethrin, revealing a synergism ratio of 7.21 which reduced the
resistance factor (RF) to 0.96, similar to susceptible TWBS larvae (Table 3.2). These
results suggest, compared to the susceptible TWBS line, that the cypermethrin
resistance observed in Pakistani H. armigera is a metabolic resistance.
In order to determine the degree of resistance dominance, heterozygous F1
larvae derived from crosses between the resistant FSD strain and the susceptible
TWBS line were tested with different doses ofα. The resulting RF of 6.67 (Table 3.2)
is slightly lower than the RF found for the homozygous FSD strain but not
significantly different indicating a semidominant or dominant resistance, but in favour
of a semidominant resistance as this was determined in the heterozygous resistant
TWB line bioassayed with fenvalerate (Joussen et al., 2012). Based on a comparison
of the dose-response curve of the F1 larvae with that of the resistant and susceptible
parent strains, a discriminating dose of 400 ng was selected for the screening of the
backcross larvae. Backcross family F1 144 from the male-informative backcross (F1
male × TWBS female) and backcross family F223 from the female-informative
backcross (F1 female × TWBS male) showed 50% mortality at the discriminating dose
and thus were selected for further AFLP analysis.
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
53
Figure 3.2 Dose-response curves of the resistant FSD strain of Pakistani Helicoverpa
armigera compared to the resistant TWBR line and the susceptible TWBS line from
Australia towards cypermethrin. For each of the six doses and a control per line, 30-40
third-instar larvae were tested by topical application. Mortalities (without control) and
regression lines from probit transformed mortalities were plotted on a probit scale
against logarithmic doses of cypermethrin. Mortalities of 0% were changed to 0.01%
and of 100% were changed to 99.99% for plotting.
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
54
Table 3.2 Determination of cypermethrin toxicity (LD50, resistance factor (RF), and
synergistic factor (SF) with and without PBO) in 3rd
instars larvae of Helicoverpa
armigera different strain through topical application methods.
Line Treatment LD50,
ng per larva
95% confidence
Intervals Slope RF
a SR
b
TWBS Cypermethrin 76.7 57.2, 101.9 1.83 - -
FSD Cypermethrin 531.7 408.1, 770.0 2.32 6.94 -
FSD Cypermethrin +
PBO 73.8 58.4, 91.6 2.61 0.96 7.21
TWBR Cypermethrin 439.3 325.8, 600.5 1.67 5.73 -
F1 (FSD ×
TWBS) Cypermethrin 511.0 289.9, 1535.7 1.08 6.67 -
aRF, resistance factor calculated as LD50 of the resistant strain/line divided by LD50 of
the susceptible line; bSR, synergism ratio calculated as LD50 of the treatment with
cypermethrin divided by the LD50 of the treatment with cypermethrin and piperonyl
butoxide (PBO)
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
55
3.3.2. AFLP marker-discovery characteristics
Hexa cutter enzymes (MseI and EcoRI) and 3 additional selective bases to the
each primer strategy was used. A total of 24 different primers combinations were used
in selective amplification and 12-36 AFLP informative markers were scored per
primer combination with 57 to 711 bp band size (Table 3.3). Overall 236 AFLP
informative markers were generated from male informative backcross and 251 AFLP
informative markers from female informative backcross (Table 3.3). There were 13
such AFLP markers which were showing similar pattern with phenotypic data; the
AFLP band was present in all survived larvae while absent in dead larvae in female
informative cross while in case of male informative cross some of the dead larvae
were showing bands while some of the survived larvae missing the band (Figure 3.3).
Taking advantage of lack of crossing over in female Lepidoptera during meiosis,
MAPMAKER 3.0b inferred 31 linkage groups from 251 AFLP markers of female
informative backcross using LOD score 3.5. The number of inferred linkage groups
conferred the reported haploid (n) number of chromosomes present in H. armigera
(Robinson, 1971). All the 13 AFLP markers showing similar pattern with phenotype
were present on linkage group 13. Thus linkage group 13 contributes resistance to
pyrethroids (cypermethrin). The screening of pyrethroid resistant chimeric gene
CYP337B3 (originated due to unequal crossing over between CYP337B1 and
CYP337B3 genes) 847 bp fragment in dead and survived larvae of female informative
backcross through PCR showed that CYP337B3 gene is absent in all dead larvae and
present in all survived larvae (Figure 3.3).
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
56
Table 3.3 Primers combination used for MIBC and FIBC and number of informative
AFLP fragments scored per primer combination.
Mse Eco FIBC
Markers MIBC Markers
CAT
AAG(700) 15 16
CAT(800) 12 11
ACC(700) 7 9
CGC(800) 7 10
TAC(700) 17 19
GTA(800) 12 12
ACA
AAG(700) 15 8
CAT(800) 7 6
CGC(800) 13 13
GTA(800) 11 14
ACG AAG(700) 14 12
CAT(800) 10 8
ACC(700) 10 10
CGC(800) 9 5
CGA
AAG(700) 10 8
CAT(800) 8 9
ACC(700) 10 11
ACT(800) 7 7
CGC(800) 7 7
CTT
AAG(700) 13 9
CAT(800) 5 9
ACC(700) 11 9
ACT(800) 13 11
CGC(800) 9 3
Total Markers 251 236
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
57
Figure 3.3 AFLP banding pattern and presence of CYP337B3 associated with
resistance. (A) Part of a representative AFLP gel showing the pattern for an AFLP
fragment (indicated by the arrowhead) strongly associated with resistance. (B) The
same individuals of the female-informative backcross tested in the AFLP analysis
were screened by PCR for the presence or absence of CYP337B3 revealing a strong
correlation between the presence of CYP337B3 and resistance. A plasmid containing
CYP337B3 served as a positive control and a water sample as a negative control.
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
58
3.3.3. Mapping of resistant gene (CYP337B3) within linkage group 13
To localize CYP337B3 within this linkage group the occurrence of crossing-
over during meiosis in lepidopteran males was exploited by analysing the male-
informative backcross. Thus the frequencies of recombinants from male informative
backcross (F1 male x TWBS female) were used for localization of pyrethroid
resistance gene CYP337B3. MAPMAKER 3.0b analysis by 251 AFLP makers of male
informative backcross using LOD score 3.5 showed that 13 AFLP markers (presnt in
survived larvae and absent in dead larvae) were appeared on different linkage groups
in the male-informative cross, because of crossing-over in the male.
In the first step, CYP337B3 was used as marker because CYP337B1 gene is
previously mapped to linkage group 13 (Wee et al., 2008). CYP337B3 gene fragment
of 847 bp was screened in dead and survived larvae of H. armigera of male
informative backcross. PCR screening showed similar result like that of female
informative back cross, CYP337B3 absent in all dead larvae while present in survived
larvae. In second step for fine scale gene mapping on linkage group already reported
ribosomal protein genes (m14-FLX, RPL10A, RPL8 and RPS23) previously mapped to
linkage group 2 in H. virescens and to chromosome 15 of B. mori (Silk worm) (Aller
et al., 2009; Yoshido et al., 2005), were screened in dead and survived larvae of male
informative backcross through PCR using EPIC primers. The amplified intron
polymorphism revealed that out of 22 dead larvae, m14-FLX, RPL10A and RPL8 is
heterozygous in 3 larvae while RPS23 showed heterozygosity in 7 larvae. Similarly
m14-FLX, RPL10A, RPL8 and RPS23 markers were found heterozygous in 4 larvae
out of 24 survived.
After getting the markers data of CYP337B3 gene and ribosomal protein gene
the linkage map of the resistance gene CYP337B3 was constructed, first by
determining the maximum likelihood order of the four ribosomal protein gene markers
(m14-FLX, RPL10A, RPL8 and RPS23) and CYP337B3 markers followed by the
addition of the 13 AFLP markers, four at a time, and the maximum likelihood
order determined among them by the ripple command using MAPMAKER 3.0b
software. The total length of the final map was 158.1 cM (Figure 3.4A).
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
59
CYP337B3 was considered as a possible candidate gene for resistance (Joussen et al.,
2012), and PCR screening showed that only CYP337B3 and not CYP337B1 or
CYP337B2 occurred in the FSD strain at the time of the crosses. Further PCR analysis
showed that the presence of CYP337B3 exhibited the same pattern as the resistance-
correlated AFLP linkage group in the female-informative backcross: present in all
bioassay survivors and absent from killed individuals (Figure 3.3B).
As CYP337B3 had previously been mapped to the homolog of B. mori
Chromosome 15, additional markers known to occur on that chromosome were
included in the analysis. CYP337B3 mapped near one end of the linkage group, with
the markers showing the same order as in B. mori. Survivorship of the cypermethrin
bioassay was most strongly correlated with the CYP337B3 genotype (Figure 3.4).
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
60
Figure 3.4 Map of resistance-associated linkage group of Helicoverpa armigera. The
resistant gene CYP337B3 was mapped using maximum likelihood as implemented in
MAPMAKER to determine the order and spacing of the 13 AFLPs, CYP337B3, and
four marker genes. The number of progeny carrying the FSD-derived allele (RS
genotype) vs. the susceptible allele (SS) at each locus among survivors of the bioassay
and killed individuals is indicated at the right. All progeny carrying the CYP337B3
allele from FSD survived and all those lacking CYP337B3 died. For the other loci, the
correlation between the FSD-derived allele and survivorship decreases with increasing
distance from CYP337B3 along the chromosome.
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
61
3.3.4. Full length gene isolation of CYP337B3 gene from FSD strain
Gene-specific PCR primers of pyrethroids susceptible gene CYP337B1 and
CYP337B2 (845 bp and 844 bp fragments respectively) and resistant gene CYP337B3
(847 bps fragment) of H. armigera were used to screen the presence of these genes in
FSD strain. PCR screening and sequencing results showed that the FSD strain contain
CYP337B3 while does not possess CYP337B1 and CYP337B2. Thus the FSD strain is
homozygous for resistant gene CYP337B3.
The primers design by Joussen et al., (2012) for full length amplification of
CYP227B3 were not able to amplify the gene in FSD strain due to the non-specificity
of primers. Then RACE-PCR strategy was adopted and primers (Table 3.1) for 3ʹ and
5ʹ RACE-PCR were used from 847 bp sequence of FSD. The full length gene was
isolated through RACE-PCR. The isolated CYP337B3 gene length was 1479 bp the
same length as that of TWB Australian strain while alignment blast results showed
that both the genes have 99% identity (Table 3.4) with 21 SNPs and 3 amino acid
differences between them (Figure 3.5). The blast results showed that CYP337B3 gene
of FSD strain showed 91% identity (Table 3.4) with all three alleles of CYP337B1
gene (NCBI accession numbers: JQ284023.1, JQ284024.1 and JQ284025.1) and 87-
88% identity (Table 3.4) with all three alleles of CYP3337B2 gene (NCBI accession
numbers: JQ284026.1 JQ284027.1 and JQ284028.1).
The full length CYP337B3 gene has ligated into pIB/V5-His TOPO TA
expression vector and transformed into insect cell line Ha2302, derived from H.
armigera. Before expression in cell line the presence of CYP337B3 gene was
confirmed through PCR using genomic DNA of cell line (Figure 3.6b). The expression
of transformed gene was determined, first, isolation of micrsomes from transformed H.
armigera-derived cells and then detected through Western blot. Western blot results
showed a CYP337B3 protein (enzyme) of 55-kilo Dalton (kDa) in size, thus
confirming that the expression of CYP337B3 gene in microsomes while in cytosol of a
cell no or very little expression of CYP337B3 protein (enzymes) was observed (Figure
3.6a). CYP337B3 gene intron region was amplified from FSD strain through PCR.
Sequencing results indicate that the intron sequence is 1017 bp in length. This
sequence has been submitted to gene bank with accession number KJ636466.
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
62
Table 3.4 Sequence identity of CYP337B3 gene of Helicoverpa armigera FSD strain
with already reported CYP337B genes through Basic local alignment search tool
(BLAST) search.
Figure 3.5 Alignment of amino acid sequences of CYP337B3 isolated from FSD strain
and TWB strain (Australian) of Helicoverpa armigera. Amino acid difference in both
proteins are highlighted in red [isoleucine (I)-Valine(V), Leucine(L)-Serine(S) and
Cysteine(C)-Arginine(R)].
Genes from BLAST search Strain (Location) Identity Accession No
H. armigera Cyp337B3 Pakistan (FSD) - -
H. armigera Cyp337B3 Australia (TWB) 99% JQ284029.1
H. armigera Cyp337b1v1 Australia (TWB) 91% JQ284023.1
H. armigera Cyp337b1v3 Australia (TWB) 91% JQ284024.1
H. armigera Cyp337b1v4 Australia (TWB) 91% JQ284025.1
H. armigera Cyp337b2v1 Australia (TWB) 88% JQ284026.1
H. armigera Cyp337b2v2 Australia (TWB) 88% JQ284027.1
H. armigera Cyp337b2v3 Australia (TWB) 87% JQ284028.1
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
63
Figure 3.6 Confirmation of cloning and heterologous expression of CYP337B3 gene
in insect cell line Ha2302. a. Detection through western blotting using denatured
microsomal proteins of Ha2302 cells containing CYP337B3 fused to V5 epitope and
His-tag and corresponding denatured cytosolic proteins (10µg, each) were separated
by SDS-PAGE. P450 enzymes were detected by western-blot using Anti-V5-HRP
antibody. b. confirmation of CYP337B3 gene transformed into insect cell line Ha2302
through PCR screening, using genomic DNA of extracted from cell line.
1 and 3 expression in cytosol, 2 and 4 expression in mircosomes
1 and 2 CYP337b3 , 3 –ve (without template DNA) and
4 +ve (CYP337B3 containing plasmid DNA), M 100
bp plus DNA ladder
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
64
3.3.5. Metabolic capabilities of CYP337B3 enzyme
After successful expression of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3, its
metabolic capabilities were analyzed with known P450 model substrates.
Subsequently, the heterologous CYP337B3 was tested for its functionality using
known P450 model substrates. CYP337B3 showed high activity against 7-
methoxyresorufin, low activity against 3-cyano-7-methoxycoumarin, 7-
methoxycoumarin, 7-ethoxyresorufin, and 7-benzyloxyresorufin, very low activity
against 7-ethoxycoumarin and no detectable activity against 7-pentoxyresorufin and 3-
cyano-7-ethoxycoumarin (Table 3.5). The overall activity of the Pakistani CYP337B3
is comparable to that of the Australian CYP337B3v1 (Table 3.5; Joussen et al., 2012),
but it is less active against 7-benzyloxyresorufin and 7-methoxyresorufin just as
CYP337B1v4 is less active against these model substrates than CYP337B1v1. This
might be another indication that the Pakistani CYP337B3 arose from CYP337B1v4
and the Australian CYP337B3v1 from CYP337B1v1. The different activity could be
due to the nonsynonymous SNP at position 1093 resulting in a different amino acid
365 (CYP337B1v1, 365I; CYP337B1v4, 365V) that is located in the substrate
recognition site 5 (Joussen et al., 2012) and could therefore be important for substrate
recognition and binding.
To confirm the role of CYP337B3 in the metabolism of cypermethrin, in vitro
assays were performed and analysed by HPLC. The cypermethrin mixture (four trans-
and four cis-isomers) used as parent compound was partially separated in trans-
(44.4%) and cis-isomers (55.6%) on HPLC with retention times (Rt) of 43.3 min and
43.6 min, respectively (Figure 3.7a). Under the conditions provided, CYP337B3 was
capable of metabolizing cypermethrin in 4 h to a main metabolite occurring in trans-
(8.1%) and cis-configuration (19.8%) and possessing a Rt of 39.3 min and 39.6 min,
respectively, and to a minor metabolite (1.5%) possessing a Rt of 37.8 min (Figure
3.7d). Overall, 29.3% of cypermethrin were metabolized in 4 h, while 70.7%
unmetabolized cypermethrin (37.2% trans- and 33.5% cis-cypermethrin) were
recovered. Recovery was about 79%. No turnover of cypermethrin was detected by the
microsomal enzymes of the non-transgenic Ha2302 cells and the metabolism by
CYP337B3 was inhibited completely by the absence of NADPH and also by the
addition of the P450 inhibitor piperonyl butoxide, respectively (Figure 3.7, c and e-f).
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
65
Table 3.5 Activity of CYP337B3 gene containing microsomes toward different model
substrates of P450 enzymes. Corrected metabolic activities were expressed as pmol
product per mg of microsomal protein per minute.
P450 MR ER PR BR
CYP337B3 255.7 6.6 n.d. 5.6
CYP337B3v1 224.3 / 201.1 6.6 / 4.2 n.d. / n.d. 9.2 / 8.1
CYP337B1v1 128.9 / 41.9 0.3 / n.d. n.d. / n.d. 31.9 / 17.1
CYP337B1v3 2.8 / n.d. n.d. / n.d n.d. / n.d. 3.2 / 0.7
CYP337B1v4 145.8 / 39.8 1.2 / 0.6 n.d. / n.d. 22.9 / 8.1
P450 MC EC CMC CEC
CYP337B3 8.3 1.9 8.4 n.d.
CYP337B3v1 15.3 / 15.3 0.9 / n.d.
9.4 / 8.2 n.d. / n.d.
CYP337B1v1 6.1 / 1.3 n.d. / n.d. 0.9 / 0.2 n.d. / n.d.b
CYP337B1v3 0.9 / 1.3 1.3 / 2.8 n.d. / n.d. n.d. / n.d.
CYP337B1v4 2.1 / n.d. n.d. / n.d. 0.7 / n.d. n.d. / n.d.
Metabolic capacities are expressed as pmol product formed by 0.2mg of microsomal
protein in 4 h. For CYP337B3v1 and the CYP337B1 allozymes, the amounts for the
enzymes lacking the V5 epitope and the His-tag are given first, followed by the
amounts for the enzymes possessing the tags (Joußen et al., 2012). For CYP337B3,
only the enzyme possessing the tags was used.
MR, 7-methoxyresorufin; ER, 7-ethoxyresorufin; PR, 7-pentoxyresorufin; BR, 7-
benzyloxyresorufin; MC, 7-methoxycoumarin; EC, 7-ethoxycoumarin; CMC, 3-
cyano-7-methoxycoumarin; CEC, 3-cyano-7-ethoxycoumarin; n.d., not detectable.
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
66
Figure 3.7 In vitro metabolism of cypermethrin by heterologously expressed
CYP337B3. Baselines were corrected by subtraction of a blank run. 1, cis-
cypermethrin; 2, trans-cypermethrin; 3, 4'-hydroxy-cis-cypermethrin; 4, 4'-hydroxy-
trans-cypermthrin; 5, putative cis-cypermethrin metabolite (hardly visible); 6,
piperonyl butoxide. a, cypermethrin (reference compound); b, study performed with
non-transgenic microsomes and NADPH regeneration system; c, study performed with
CYP337B3 containing microsomes and NADPH regeneration system; d, study
performed with CYP337B3 containing microsomes omitting the NADPH regeneration
system; e, study performed with CYP337B3 containing microsomes, NADPH
regeneration system, and 40nmol of piperonyl butoxide.
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
67
3.4. Discussion
It is essential to understand the molecular basis of ecological adaptation of pest
insects in order to protect our valuable agricultural crops from their harmful effects.
Under strong selection pressure they tend to evolve different resistance mechanisms to
fit themselves in ecosystem but the genetic bases of these changes are still not
completely understood (Orr, 1998). H. armigera a lepidopteran agricultural pest has
evolved resistance against all conventional insecticides and likely against biological
insecticides (Bt) by evolving different resistance mechanisms.. Thus there is a great
potential to explore these genetic mechanisms by constructing linkage map using
anchor loci.
It is well known that H. armigera has evolved itself against pyrethroid
insecticides. In Australia H. armigera is highly resistant to fenvalerate (Gunning et al.,
1991; Joussen et al., 2012) followed by cypermethrin (Gunning et al., 1991), while in
Pakistan H. armigera is highly resistant to cypermethrin (Aheer et al., 2009; Ahmad et
al., 1997; Yang et al., 2004). The present study demonstrates that H. armigera strains
from different geographical regions showed resistance to a common pyrethroid,
cypermethrin. FSD and TWBR showed 5.7- and 6.9-fold resistance over the
susceptible strain. By comparing LD50 of cypermethrin for FSD strain with those of
Ahmad et al., (1995) baseline of LD50 value of Pakistani susceptible strain showed an
alarming increase in LD50 (921-fold) for H. armigera in Pakistan since 1991. In
synergism study with piperonyl butoxide (PBO) a known inhibitor of mixed function
oxidases and esterases (Hodgson et al., 1999; Willoughby et al., 2007; Young et al.,
2005), showed that cypermethrin resistance in FSD was completely supressed by
PBO, suggesting that the resistance in FSD strain is mainly due to metabolic enzymes.
Similar suppression study has been reported from Australia (Forrester et al., 1993) and
Pakistan (Aheer et al., 2009; Ahmad et al., 1997; Yang et al., 2004). Thus FSD strain
is resistant against cypermethrin and has evolved metabolic resistance against it.
Then the next question was that whether one (single mechanism) or more than
one gene (single mechanism or two mechanisms) in H. armigera FSD strain is
involved in cypermethrin resistance. Previously it is known that Australian strain
ANO2 had evolved P450 mediated resistance mechanism against pyrethroid.
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
68
Moreover, this resistance was found to be semi-dominant due to its complete
suppression by PBO (Daly and Fisk, 1992). Later on it was found that resistance in
ANO2 is monogenic at RFen1 locus present on AFLP linkage group 13. Present study
was focused to identify the major locus involved in pyrethroid resistance and linkage
group which reside this locus in H. armigera (FSD) genome. Thus whole-genome
approach (Heckel et al., 1998) was adopted and AFLP markers system has been
successfully used in several insects for identification of resistant gene (Hawthorne,
2001; Heckel et al., 1998; Kaiser and Heckel, 2012; Sheck et al., 2006; Wee et al.,
2008). In current study FSD male was crossed with TWBS female and the F1 progeny
was investigated for resistance dominance. Comparison of dose-mortality curves of
heterozygous F1 population (Hybrids) and its resistant parental strain FSD showed
similar level of resistance against cypermethrin with 6.9- and 6.6-fold respectively.
Thus, confirming that the resistance in FSD strain is metabolic because it was
suppressed by PBO shows the involvement of P450s. Similar result has been
previously reported in Australian H. armigera fenvalerate resistant strain (Daly and
Fisk, 1992; Wee et al., 2008). Moreover, the toxicity test of back cross progeny
showed 50% mortality after application of discriminating dose, which revealed that
resistance in FSD is monogenic because the segregation occurred at single major
locus.
In the next step of this study the genomic saturation was done by using AFLPs
by scoring sufficient markers in the backcross in order to identify segregating gene
that evolved against cypermethrin in FSD strain. Additionally, the biphasic approach
in lepidoptera (i.e H. armigera) was applied for efficient mapping of the resistance
gene/loci over chromosome. In this study 251 AFLPs were scored from FIBC using 21
primer combinations and these were found to group into 31 linkage groups,
corresponding to the known number of chromosomes in H. armigera (Robinson,
1971). Moreover, 13 AFLPs were found on linkage group 13 which show strong
interaction between genotype and survivorship. Similar result has been shown by Wee
et al., (2008) that semi-dominant locus RFen1 involved in pyrethroids resistance reside
on AFLP linkage group 13 and P450 gene CYP337B1 is tightly linked to it (Heckel et
al., 1998; Wee et al., 2008). In contrast it is known that crossing-over does occur in
lepidopteran male during meiosis (Fisk, 1989) and current results confirmed this
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
69
phenomenon as in MIBC 13 AFLPs which have shown interaction between genotype
and survivorship, 8 AFLPs present on linkage group 13 while 5 AFLPs are present on
linkage group 2, so confirming that recombination during meiosis has occurred in FSD
male.
Next question was which P450 gene is involved in metabolic resistance in FSD
strain as previously numbers of P450 genes have been extensively studied in H.
armigera which are involved in pyrethroids resistance (Brun-Barale et al., 2010;
Grubor and Heckel, 2007; Ranasinghe and Hobbs, 1998; Wee et al., 2008; Xiao-Ping
and Hobbs, 1995; Yang et al., 2006). These P450 genes were identified on the basis of
difference in gene expression between resistant and susceptible strain. So it was
difficult to conclude how many of the P450s in the genome of H. armigera are
candidates for involvement in pyrethroid resistance and can be used as a marker gene
for screening field population.
Recently, it was found that CYP337B3 a new chimeric gene, which resulted
from an unequal crossing over between two parental genes (CYP337B1 and
CYP337B2) is mainly responsible for fenvalerate resistance (Joussen et al., 2012). It is
hypothesized that the CYP337B3 (resistant gene) and CYP337B1 and CYP337B2
(susceptible genes) could be a good marker for screening H. armigera cypermethrin
resistant strain FSD and interestingly only CYP337B3 gene was present in FSD strain.
So it can be concluded that resistance in FSD strain is mainly metabolic and could be
possibly due to CYP337B3 gene alone.
The PCR screening results of CYP337B3 gene in MIBC revealed, similar
pattern of interaction between genotype and survivorship like 13 AFLPs in FIBC do
have. Thus the location of the resistance gene (CYP337B3) reside within linkage
group13 was analysed by using MIBC recombinant AFLPs, CYP337B3 pattern and
ribosomal protein genes. Results indicated that CYP337B3 is linked to linkage group
13 and the most likely location was 9.6 centi-Morgans (cM) from ribosomal protein
gene M14_FLX. Thus the linkage results confirmed that CYP337B3 is a candidate for
detoxification which contributed to pyrethroid resistance in FSD strain, is in
agreement with the previous findings of Joussen et al., (2012) and Wee et al., (2008).
Identification, characterisation and metabolic capabilities of cypermethrin resistance gene in H. armigera
70
As discussed above a number of H. armigera P450 genes have been reported to
be involved in pyrethroid resistance and 14 P450 genes including CYP9A12,
CYP9A14, CYP6B7 and CYP337B3 possess the metabolic capabilities against different
pyrethroids (fenvalerate and esfenvalerate) (Duangkaew et al., 2011; Feyereisen, 2012;
Joussen et al., 2012; Mao et al., 2011). However, CYP6B7 has been mapped to linkage
group 14, thus eliminated from the list of candidate genes involved in insecticide
resistance in H. armigera (Grubor and Heckel, 2007). Only recently, Joussen et al.,
(2012) have shown that CYP337B3 gene isolated from Australian TWB strain is
capable to metabolise fenvalerate. Here it is demonstrated that CYP337B3 gene
isolated from FSD strain is capable of metabolising both cis- and trans-isomers of
cypermethrin insecticide in vitro. However, it is known that different strains of the
same species are capable to develop different resistance mechanisms (Brun-Barale et
al., 2010) but by comparing results with those of Joussen et al., (2012) it is clear that
similar mechanism has been evolved by Pakistani strain FSD and Australian strain
TWB. Here question arise that how is it possible that same resistance gene is present
in geographically different strains of H. armigera. The possible reason could be that
H. armigera have the ability to move at long distances even 100 kilometres (Farrow
and Daly, 1987; Rochester et al., 1996; Zhou et al., 2000). These evidences support the
involvement of CYP337B3 in pyrethroid resistance in H. armigera from different
geographical origins. These findings further strengthen the idea that CYP337B1,
CYP337B2 and CYP337B3 could be very useful markers for screening pyrethroid
resistance in field population of H. armigera.
Expression profiling of H. armigera CYP450 genes
71
Chapter 4
Expression profiling of Helicoverpa armigera cytochrome p450
monooxygenases genes and their role in insecticides resistance
4.1. Introduction
A wide range of chemical and biological pesticides are used to control
polyphagous crop pest, H. armigera (Huang et al., 2002; Lu et al., 2012; Schnepf et
al., 1998). Excessive use of chemical insecticides has resulted in the emergence of
resistant strains, and currently there are 639 registered cases of H. armigera resistance
against major chemistries of insecticides including organophosphates,
organochlorines, carbamates and pyrethroids (Ahmad, 2007; Butler, 2011; Whalon et
al., 2013). Since their introduction in 1970s, pyrethroids have been widely used for H.
armigera control. This class of neurotoxins are comparatively cheaper, easily available
and effective against insects. However, reports of H. armigera resistance to
pyrethroids have been documented since 1983 (Gunning et al., 1991). Today,
pyrethroid resistant strains are prevalent in Asia, Africa, Oceania and some parts of
Europe (Aheer et al., 2009; Brun-Barale et al., 2010; Gunning et al., 1991; Russell and
Kranthi, 2006; Torres-Vila et al., 2002; Yang et al., 2004).
Resistance to insecticides may be conferred through a single or a combination
of mechanisms (Hemingway et al., 2004). H. armigera has evolved a combination of
mechanisms of resistance, namely knockdown resistance (Kdr), reduced cuticular
penetration, and overexpression of detoxifying enzymes including cytochrome P450
(P450) monooxygenases, glutathione S-transferases and esterase (Ahmad et al., 2006;
Gunning et al., 1991; Martin et al., 2005; McCaffery, 1998; Torres-Vila et al., 2002).
Involvement of Kdr and reduced cuticular penetration in pyrethroid resistance have
been reported from Asia and Australia (Ahmad et al., 2006; Ahmad et al., 1989;
Gunning et al., 1991; Kranthi et al., 2001). Similarly, resistance development through
glutathione S-transferases (GST) has been documented in some studies (Kranthi et al.,
1997). Elevated levels of esterases are known to confer resistance against
organophosphates and carbamates (Ahmad, 2004; Gunning et al., 1995) but is less
important in pyrethroid resistance (Kranthi et al., 2001) except in Australia and Africa,
Expression profiling of H. armigera CYP450 genes
72
where overproduction of esterase isoenzymes have been shown to be involved in
pyrethroid resistance (Gunning et al., 2007; Young et al., 2005).
Studies with a synergist, piperonyl butoxide (PBO) have indicated that
resistance against pyrethroids is achieved predominantly by metabolic detoxification
through P450 monooxygenases (Aheer et al., 2009; Brun-Barale et al., 2010; Yang et
al., 2004). P450s are heme-thiolate proteins which constitute the largest superfamily of
genes catalysing chemically distant reactions involving metabolic oxidation of
endogenous compounds (hormones, lipids and steroids), and in the catabolism and
anabolism of exogenous compounds (drugs, pesticides and other toxic chemicals)
(Feyereisen, 1999; Guengerich, 2007; Nelson, 2009; Scott, 1999). Previous studies
show that multiple P450 genes are involved in metabolism of pesticides resulting in
resistance to insecticides. The number of identified P450 genes in different insect
species is more than 1700 (Liu, 2012). In most cases the constitutive overexpression of
one or more P450 genes is associated with insecticidal resistance (Feyereisen, 2006).
Although the correlation between overexpressed P450 genes and resistance is not well
understood in pyrethroid resistant strain, elevated metabolism at biochemical level has
confirmed the role of P450 genes (Yang et al., 2004).
The quest for pinpointing P450 genes involved in metabolic resistance has
continued since their role in resistance was determined for the first time. From the
CYP family, CYP6B2 was the first gene isolated and sequenced from Australian H.
armigera (Xiao-Ping and Hobbs, 1995) followed by isolation of CYP6B6 and CYP6B7
(Ranasinghe and Hobbs, 1998). Overexpression of CYP6B7 in a pyrethroid-resistant
H. armigera strain was considered to be responsible for metabolism of pyrethroids. In
another study, CYP9A12, CYP9A14 and CYP6B7 were found constitutively
overexpressed in laboratory selected pyrethroid-resistant strain of H. armigera (Yang
et al., 2006). However, CYP6B7 gene lost its credibility as a candidate gene for
resistance due to its occurrence in tandom array on same linkage group along with
fenvalerate resistant locus (RFen1), CYP6B6 and CYP6B2 genes, next to para-type
sodium channel gene (Grubor and Heckel, 2007). In Australian AN02 strain of H.
armigera, researchers reported the overexpression of two P450 genes (CYP337B1,
CYP4S1) and a glutathione S-transferase gene (Wee et al., 2008). A significant level of
Expression profiling of H. armigera CYP450 genes
73
overexpression of CYP4M6, CYP4M7, CYP6AE11, CYP9A12, CYP332A1 and
CYP337B1 has been documented in deltamethrin resistant strains of H. armigera from
Africa and Spain (Brun-Barale et al., 2010). More recently a new chimeric gene
CYP337B3, which resulted from an unequal crossing-over between two parental
genes, CYP337B1 and CYP337B2, has been reported from a resistant strain of H.
armigera, in Australia (Joussen et al., 2012). Such reports have further highlighted the
role of CYP genes in H. armigera resistance against pyrethroids.
The present study was designed to identify and analyse the expression patterns
of the key P450 genes in two pyrethroid-resistant strains of H. armigera from
geographically distant regions, the TWB strain from Australia, and the FSD strain
from Pakistan. The study further aims to understand the possible role of overexpressed
P450 genes in detoxification of pyrethroid insecticides.
Expression profiling of H. armigera CYP450 genes
74
4.2. Material and Methods
4.2.1. H. armigera strains used in quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR)
Quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR) was executed with individuals of the
resistant strain FSD in comparison with the resistant line TWBR and the susceptible
line TWBS. Details of these strains of H. armigera have been described earlier (Table
2.1, Section 3.2.1).
4.2.2. RNA extraction and cDNA synthesis
For qRT-PCR, total RNA was extracted and purified from fifth-instar larvae
(three larvae pooled in one biological replicate and three biological replicates per
strain) using method as described earlier (section 2.5). Quality of purified RNA was
analysed by Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit (Agilent Technologies, Germany). First
strand cDNA was synthesized using RevertAid H Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis
Kit (Life Technologies, Germany) from 500 ng of total RNA in 20 µL of reaction
mixture with 5X reaction buffer, 200 U RevertAid H Minus M-MuLV reverse
transcriptase, 20 U RiboLock RNase inhibitor, 10 mM dNTPs, and 50 µM oligo (dT)
18 primer at 42°C for 30 min, 50°C for 60 min, and 95°C for 2 min.
4.2.3. Primer designing
Gene-specific primers for 64 P450 genes (genes included in Figure 4.1 and
additional for an unnamed CYP301A gene) covering four major P450 gene families,
CYP3, CYP4, CYP6, and CYP9, were designed using Primer3
(http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/; Table 4.1). Eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4A
(eIF4A) and ribosomal protein S18 (RPS18) were used as reference genes (Table 4.1).
All primers were designed using sequences from the in-house database of the
Australian H. armigera strain TWB.
4.2.4. Quantitative real time PCR (qRT-PCR)
PCR was performed in optical 96-well plates on the Agilent Technologies
Stratagene Mx3000P Real-Time PCR System using the ABsolute QPCR SYBR Green
Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) to monitor the double-stranded DNA synthesis in
combination with ROX as a passive reference dye included in the PCR master mix.
Expression profiling of H. armigera CYP450 genes
75
Amplification conditions were 95°C for 10 min to activate the polymerase, followed
by 40 cycles at 95°C for 30 sec, 60°C for 30 sec, and 72°C for 30 sec. A melting and
dissociation curve analysis (MxPro 4.0 QPCR Software, Agilent Technologies) was
performed in order to verify that the amplicon possessed the correct melting
temperature and therefore exhibited the predicted length and that there was only one
PCR product amplified per reaction. Each experiment was repeated with three
independent RNA samples (biological replicates), and each reaction was repeated
three times (technical replicates) to minimize intra-experiment variations. The average
copy number ± SEM of each P450 mRNA relative to 1000 copies of mRNA of the
reference gene eIF4A was calculated using qBase (version 1.3.5). Copy numbers in
resistant strains FSD or TWBR were compared with copy numbers in the susceptible
TWBS strain using two-tailed heteroscedastic t tests in Excel.
4.2.5. Genomic DNA and RNA extraction from untreated backcross larvae for
CYP337B3 gene screening
To examine whether P450 upregulation in FSD was genetically linked to the
cypermethrin resistance in FSD, DNA and RNA were extracted from 40 larvae of the
same female-informative backcross used in the linkage mapping. These larvae had
never been exposed to cypermethrin, so any expression differences are constitutive,
not induced. Both DNA and RNA were isolated from each individual using protocol
as described (Section 2.4 and 2.5). DNA was used to examine the presence or absence
of CYP337B3 using gene specific primers (Table 3.1), and thus to identify individuals
who had received the FSD-derived resistance-associated linkage group from their F1
mother. RNA was used to study the expression level of the three P450s found to be
highly up-regulated in FSD.
Expression profiling of H. armigera CYP450 genes
76
Table 4.1 List of primer pairs used for RT-qPCR and the expression analysis
Gene Forward primer (5'-3') Reverse Primer (5'-3') GenBank
Accession No.
CYP4G8 TCTGACCTGAAGGAGGAGGA TAGCAGGCTTTGGTTGGTTT KM016724
CYP4G9 CCACCCTCAGCACTACAAGG GGTCCAGCACTGAATGGAAT KM016725
CYP4G26 TGACCTCCGATGTGACTGAG TCTGCCTGGGTTCAATCTTC KM016723
CYP4L5 GTGCTGGTCCGAGAAATTGT GTTCAGGCTCTTGAGGTGCT KM016727
CYP4L11 GCATTCTTGGACCTGTTGCT TCGTGACCCTCAAACATGAA KM016726
CYP4M6v2 AATAGCCGTAGCGGAGGTTT CAGGTCCTTCGTTCCTGAAG KM016729
CYP4M7v2 AGCGCTGGTCCTAGAAATTG ATGGTTTCGTCACTGGCTTC KM016730
CYP4M10v2 ATTGCGGAACTTCGTATTG TGAAATTGACGACCACTGGA KM016728
CYP4S2 CAGCTTGATGCCCACGAT GCGTATGGCGTCGTCTAGTT KM016732
CYP4S12 TGCGTAACTTCAAGCTGGTG AGATAGGGTCAACGGGTCTG KM016731
CYP4S13 CTATGCATCCGTACGCCTTT CGACAAATTCCACTCAGCAC EF591060
CYP4AU1 TGCAGTAGTGCCAATGGTGT TCGGTCCACACTGTTCTCTG KM016722
CYP6B2v3 ATTGGACCGAAAGGAGGAAT TTCATGGTCCGTTGTCGTTA KM016746
CYP6B6v2 ATTGGACCGAAAGGAGGAAT CCGTTACTTGTACCGTCATTATAGC KM016748
CYP6B8 CAATGGATATCAGCCCGTTT GCAGGCTTCTTGTTGACGAC KM016749
CYP6B43 TTGTAGGGAGGTTATTGAAGCAG TGCCTTCTCGTCTCAAGTCC KM016747
CYP6AB9 CATAGGTGAGCGGCTAGGTC TGCACTATGCTGGACTGAGG KM016734
CYP6AB10 TGTGTTGGTGCCAGATTAGG CTACGAAACCTTCGGAAACG KM016733
CYP6AE11 TCTCACATTGCCTTTCACTCC ACTCCCAAAGAACCCACTCC KM016735
CYP6AE12 AGATGAGGCTCTGCGTCTGT CAGATGCACCCTCAGACCTT KM016736
CYP6AE14 GGATCCGGAGGAGTATAGGC TACAAAGTCTCGGGCCTTCA KM016737
CYP6AE15v2 CCCTTACTGAGCCGATTTGA ATCTGCGTGTCGGGAGATAG KM016738
CYP6AE16 GTTCCTGCCTGAGAACAAGC CTTCGTCTTCATCCCTGGAG KM016739
CYP6AE17 GTTCCTGCCTGAGAACAAGC TAATTATTCCCGCCGTCATC KM016740
CYP6AE19 GCATATGTTCTTGCGCCTTC TTTGATTGCCCATGAATCTG KM016741
CYP6AE20v2 CTGGCAGGCCTTGTCACTAT GCATCGAACACCAGGTCTCT KM016742
CYP6AE23 ACAGCTTGTTGCCAGTTAAGC ACCGTCTATTTGCGTCCGTA KM016744
CYP6AE24 CCAAATTGAGAACCTCCTCCT CCACGCACTTAGGAACACAA KM016743
CYP6AN1 ATCGAAGAGTTGGGCATCAC TATCCGGCATGAACTTCTCC KM016745
CYP9A3 GTGCTTATTCGGGAGATGGA CCCTGTAGCTGCATGTTGAA KM016754
CYP9A12 TCTGCGAGATGAAGGTGATG TTTCAGTCGCATGTTGAAGG AY371318
CYP9A14 ATGGAAGTCAGCGAGCAGAT TATCACATCGTTGGCGTAGC KM016750
Expression profiling of H. armigera CYP450 genes
77
Table 4.1 Continued
Gene Forward primer (5'-3') Reverse Primer (5'-3') GenBank
Accession no.
CYP9A15 GGATCGAGGTTTGCTCTCTG ATTGTTAGCCGCAAGTTTGG KM016751
CYP9A17 CTATGGGCGGCACGTTTAT CCACTATTGTTTGAGCGGAGA KM016752
CYP9A23v3 CAGATCTTACGGCACATGGA AAGCCAGTGTCCTCCTTTCA KM016753
CYP9A34 TGTGCGAGATGAAAGCGATA AGGTTGAACTGATCGGGAGA KM016755
CYP9G5 TTCCCGAACCAGACAAGTTT ATCATCGCGAACCTCATACC KM016757
CYP9AJ1 GCAGCAAAGGTATTCCTGGT CCTGGGTCTCAGTATGAATGC KM016756
CYP302A1 CAAGTCCCTCAAAGCGTGA TTGCTTTAGCCCATTGCAC KM016700
CYP304F1 CCTGCCGTACAGTTTGTCCT GACGACGCGGTCTATCTCTT KM016701
CYP305B1 AGTACTCATGTCGCTGGGAGA CGCTTTCGTCAATGAACCTT KM016702
CYP306A1 ACCTCTGTTACGCTGGCTTG TAGTTGAGAGCCGTCGACCT KM016703
CYP307A1 GCAGGAGTTTGAAATAGGAGCA GAATCAATGCTTTCTGGGAATC KM016704
CYP321A5 TGGAATGGGAAACAGGACAT CTGCTGGCTTTCTGGGATAG KM016705
CYP321B1 CGAGATACGCACGAATTCAA TTGTACTGGATGCCTCCTTTG KM016706
CYP324A1 TATGCCGTTTGGAGAAGGAC TGTTTGGCAGCACTCTCACT KM016707
CYP332A1 CCCGAGGTTCTGCATAGGTA CCACGATCTTAGGTGCATCA KM016708
CYP333A1 CGGCTTCGGAATAAGGAGTT CCCTCCCACGTAACTTTGAA KM016709
CYP333B3 GGCCAACACAGTCACAGCTA GGACACAATTTCCTCCCTCA KM016710
CYP340G1 GCAGATGTCACCAAGATGGA CCTCATCCTCATCACCAACA KM016711
CYP340H1 CCGGACAAGGATCAGTTCAT CCGATACAGTTGCGTCTGC KM016712
CYP340H2 TATGCACACGCAACAGATGA GCTTGCCGAAGTCCATTTAT KM016713
CYP340J1 TCAATATGGCGGATGAACAA TGGATTTGACCCAAGAAGGA KM016714
CYP340K1 ACGGCAAACAAGACTTTGCT CGCCAACATCACCTTTCATA KM016715
CYP341B2 GGCTACCAATACGCGATGAT GCCATTACTTCTGGCCATGT KM016716
CYP341B7 AATGACACCCGTCATCCATT AGGTCACTATGCAGCCAAGG KM016717
CYP354A3 GGTCTGAGATTCGCCATGTT CTGAATGGGATCAACCGTCT KM016718
CYP367A8 TGAACCAGAAAGGGCCACTA TTTGCTGTCTTCCGTTGGTT KM016719
CYP367B2 AGAGCGGTTCAATCCAGAAA TGCCGAAGTATCTTCCCAAA KM016720
CYP428A1 CCATCTGGCAAACTCATTAGC GGCCTTTGTCCATTGAAGTG KM016721
eIF4A AGCAAATCCAAAAGGTGGTG AGAGCACGGCGAGTTATCAT JK139881
RPS18 ACTGCCATCAAGGGTGTTG TGTATTGCCTGGGGTTAGACA JK127315
Expression profiling of H. armigera CYP450 genes
78
4.3. Results
4.3.1. P450 genes in H. armigera
To examine the possible role of other P450 genes in the cypermethrin
resistance of the FSD strain, an in-house cDNA database of H. armigera was searched.
This revealed contigs of 63 P450 genes, mainly belonging to the P450 gene families
CYP6 (17), CYP4 (12), CYP9 (9), and CYP340 (25). These P450s can be clustered by
phylogenetic analysis into two clades, the CYP3 clades (Figure 4.1, bottom part) and
the CYP4 clan (Figure 4.1, top part).
4.3.2. Expression analysis of P450 Genes
The expression levels of these P450 genes were investigated through RT-qPCR
in the cypermethrin resistant FSD strain and the TWBR line using the TWBS line as a
susceptible control. Primers for 58 genes were validated for TWBS and TWBR, but
only 51 primer pairs worked in FSD, likely due to sequence divergence in one or both
primer binding sites. It was not possible to design specific RT-qPCR primers that
could discriminate between CYP337B1, CYP337B2, and CYP337B3, because of the
high sequence similarity of these genes. Initially two housekeeping genes, RPS18 and
eIF4A, were used as reference genes, but because only the expression of eIF4A
remained constant for all the three lines tested over different rounds of experiments,
RPS18 was excluded from the analysis.
4.3.2.1. Expression analysis of P450 genes in H. armigera resistant strains
i) Upregulation of P450s
Statistical analysis of the qRT-PCR data revealed that 19 and 30 P450 genes,
respectively, were up-regulated in FSD and TWBR line compared to the susceptible
TWBS line. In FSD strain 12 P450 genes were significantly up-regulated compared to
TWBS (Table 4.2). Two genes showed more than ten-fold higher expression in FSD:
CYP340G1 (147-fold) and CYP340H1 (15-fold). Expression levels in TWBR were
much more similar to TWBS
Expression profiling of H. armigera CYP450 genes
79
ii) Downregulation of P450s
As compared to TWBS 19 P450 genes (Table 4.2) were significantly down-
regulated in the FSD strain, CYP6B2v3 (22.2-fold), as the significantly highest down-
regulated gene in the FSD strain. While in TWBR line, only one significant difference,
a 73-fold down-regulation of CYP321B1 (Table 4.2).
4.3.3. Expression pattern of FSD strain up-regulated genes (CYP340G1,
CYP340H1 and CYP341B2) in F1 backcross progeny
The three P450 genes showing the highest overexpression in FSD (CYP340G1,
CYP340H1, and CYP341B2) were not overexpressed in backcross progeny receiving
the FSD-derived linkage group from the F1 mother, relative to the backcross progeny
receiving the TWBS-derived linkage group (Figure 4.2). Instead, the expression levels
were equal in these two groups, and similar to the susceptible TWBS line suggesting
that the upregulation of CYP340G1, CYP340H1, and CYP341B2 were not genetically
linked to the cypermethrin resistance in FSD strain.
Expression profiling of H. armigera CYP450 genes
80
Figure 4.1 Maximum-likelihood tree of 63 P450 proteins from Helicoverpa armigera.
Protein sequences were aligned using Clustal W, and the tree was constructed using
RAxML on the CIPRES Science Gateway server and drawn using FigTree. Asterisks
denote proteins that were not investigated using RT-qPCR in this study.
Expression profiling of H. armigera CYP450 genes
81
Figure 4.2 mRNA abundance of 3 P450 genes in backcross larvae (BC) possessing or
lacking CYP337B3 compared to the resistant FSD strain and TWBS line. Error bars
represent the standard deviation; bars from the same gene sharing the same letter are
not significantly different (p < 0.05).
Expression profiling of H. armigera CYP450 genes
82
Table 4.2 P450 mRNA expression levels in three strains of Helicoverpa armigera as
determined by RT-qPCR.
P450 FSD vs TWBS
sig. FSD ± SE per
1000 eIF4A
TWBS ± SE
per 1000 eIF4
TWBR ± SE per
1000 eIF4
TWBR vs TWBS sig.
Up Down up down
CYP340G1 146.6 ** 40.1 ± 8.0 0.3 ± 0.2 1.6 ± 0.4 5.7 ns
CYP340H1 15.3 *** 12.3 ± 1.5 0.8 ± 0.1 6.2 ± 2.0 7.7 ns
CYP341B2 6.5 ** 7.1 ± 1.2 1.1 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.1 1.6 ns
CYP9AJ1 5.0 ** 2.2 ± 0.4 0.4 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.2 1.5 ns
CYP340H2 4.6 * 0.1 ± 0.03 0.03 ± 0.01 0.3 ± 0.1 8.2 ns
CYP9G5 4.0 ns 4.1 ± 1.3 1.0 ± 0.2 1.2 ± 0.1 1.2 ns
CYP367B2 3.2 ns 3.4 ± 1.3 1.1 ± 0.2 1.3 ± 0.2 1.2 ns
CYP9A3 3.2 *** 34.0 ± 2.2 10.6 ± 0.6 14.8 ± 1.5 1.4 ns
CYP6AB9 3.1 *** 425.3 ± 44.5 138.9 ± 8.6 195.0 ± 20.7 1.4 ns
CYP4S12 2.3 *** 10.2 ± 0.7 4.4 ± 0.9 2.9 ± 0.3 1.5 ns
CYP341B7 2.0 * 1.0 ± 0.1 0.5 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.2 1.5 ns
CYP6B6v2 1.7 ns 16.4 ± 5.1 9.9 ± 6.2 60.2 ± 22.9 6.1 ns
CYP4G8 1.5 ns 2448.2 ± 393.2 1602.9 ± 148.0 1800.7 ± 250.9 1.1 ns
CYP6AE17 1.5 ns 514.8 ± 68.1 337.8 ± 48.5 232.5 ± 25.6 1.5 ns
CYP9A34 1.4 * 40.3 ± 3.9 28.1 ± 1.7 82.2 ± 17.1 2.9 ns
CYP4S13 1.4 ns 4.3 ± 0.6 3.0 ± 0.8 4.1 ± 0.4 1.3 ns
CYP6AE14 1.4 * 42.8 ± 3.8 30.8 ± 1.7 19.6 ± 2.8 1.6 ns
CYP4M7v2 1.0 ns 26.9 ± 4.0 25.9 ± 1.1 41.1 ± 4.3 1.6 ns
CYP306A1 1.0 ns 23.6 ± 5.4 22.8 ± 4.1 38.3 ± 4.5 1.7 ns
CYP4G26 1.0 ns 36.0 ± 7.9 36.4 ± 6.1 35.6 ± 4.3 1.0 ns
CYP6AB10 1.1 ns 13.1 ± 3.1 14.3 ± 7.2 26.3 ± 16.4 1.8 ns
CYP4G9 1.1 ns 143.3 ± 25.0 158.0 ± 11.2 212.2 ± 21.3 1.3 ns
CYP4AU1 1.1 ns 4.1 ± 0.8 4.7 ± 0.7 4.6 ± 0.4 1.0 ns
CYP6AE16 1.2 ns 2.3 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.2 1.0 ± 0.1 2.7 ns
CYP304F1 1.3 ns 0.1 ± 0.02 0.1 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.01 1.6 ns
CYP6B43 1.4 ns 7.1 ± 0.6 9.6 ± 2.3 7.4 ± 0.2 1.3 ns
CYP4S2 1.4 ns 0.1 ± 0.02 0.2 ± 0.02 0.3 ± 0.04 1.6 ns
CYP9A23v3 1.6 ns 8.5 ± 1.7 13.6 ± 1.9 8.0 ± 1.2 1.7 ns
CYP9A12 1.7 ns 1.0 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.1 1.4 ± 0.1 1.2 ns
CYP4L5 1.7 ** 256.5 ± 39.9 430.9 ± 23.9 315.6 ± 15.6 1.4 ns
CYP340J1 1.7 * 11.4 ± 2.5 19.6 ± 2.5 33.4 ± 8.1 1.7 ns
CYP6B8 2.0 ns 4.6 ± 0.6 9.1 ± 4.4 13.7 ± 4.8 1.5 ns
CYP6AN1 2.1 *** 187.0 ± 18.0 389.5 ± 22.9 599.6 ± 134 1.5 ns
CYP333A1 2.4 *** 10.7 ± 0.4 25.4 ± 1.4 23.6 ± 1.0 1.1 ns
CYP305B1 2.6 * 24.5 ± 10.2 63.4 ± 12.4 12.0 ± 1.0 5.3 ns
CYP9A15 2.6 *** 0.6 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.1 6.1 ± 2.0 3.8 ns
CYP4L11 2.7 *** 82.5 ± 6.2 223 ± 16.8 202.1 ± 11.7 1.1 ns
CYP321A5 2.8 * 308.3 ± 79.2 850.3 ± 194.3 421.6 ± 95.2 2.0 ns
CYP428A1 2.8 ** 6.0 ± 2.6 16.8 ± 1.5 19.9 ± 1.1 1.2 ns
Expression profiling of H. armigera CYP450 genes
83
P450 FSD vs TWBS Sig. FSD ± SE per
1000 eIF4A
TWBS ± SE
per 1000
eIF4A
TWBR ± SE per
1000 eIF4A
TWBR vs TWBS sig.
Up Down Up Down
CYP332A1 2.8 ** 65.7 ± 14.1 183.7 ± 32.7 104.4 ± 15.4 1.8 ns
CYP6AE12 2.9 *** 34.4 ± 2.1 98.5 ± 9.5 74.0 ± 11.0 1.3 ns
CYP333B3 3.0 *** 0.4 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.1 2.0 ± 0.2 1.8 ns
CYP307A1 3.1 * 1.8 ± 0.5 5.4 ± 1.1 3.1 ± 0.6 1.8 ns
CYP6AE24 3.1 ** 260.0 ± 7.0 80.1 ± 12.8 109.5 ± 21.7 1.4 ns
CYP354A3 3.6 *** 12.4 ± 1.1 45.0 ± 3.7 38.9 ± 3.0 1.2 ns
CYP4M6v2 3.8 ns 28.0 ± 18.1 107.3 ± 40.6 116.6 ± 13.4 4.2 ns
CYP6AE19 3.9 *** 1.3 ± 0.3 5.1 ± 0.6 24.0 ± 5.8 4.7 ns
CYP9A14 5.3 * 4.1 ± 1.0 22.0 ± 5.0 14.9 ± 3.6 1.5 ns
CYP6AE11 6.0 *** 139.0 ± 36.8 831.1 ± 79.6 275.6 ± 39.0 3.0 ns
CYP4M10v2 10.2 ns 1.3 ± 0.4 13.6 ± 6.2 16.5 ± 11.1 1.2 ns
CYP6B2v3 22.2 *** 14.8 ± 1.9 328.4 ± 49.2 146.5 ± 29.0 2.2 ns
CYP6AE23 nd 8.6 ± 1.2 31.3 ± 8.5 3.7 ns
CYP6AE20v2 nd 0.2 ± 0.03 0.3 ± 0.1 1.6 ns
CYP6AE15v2 nd 7.2 ± 0.5 10 ± 0.9 1.4 ns
CYP9A17 nd 269.6 ± 22.4 191.1 ± 52.8 1.4 ns
CYP302A1 nd 0.02 ± 0.02 0.01 ± 0.01 1.7 ns
CYP324A1 nd 47.5 ± 12.9 13.4 ± 4.5 3.5 ns
CYP321B1 nd 34.8 ± 9.7 0.5 ± 0.2 73.2 *
CYP340K1 nd nd nd
CYP367A8 nd nd nd
Copy number estimates ± standard error of the mean are given per 1000 copies of
mRNA for reference gene eIF4A. Ratios of copy numbers are shown in separate
columns for up- or down-regulation in each resistant strain, relative to the susceptible
TWBS strain. sig., statistical significance of t-test: ns P > 0.05; * P < 0.05, ** P <
0.01, *** P < 0.001 nd, not detected.
Expression profiling of H. armigera CYP450 genes
84
4.4. Discussion
Based on previous results that metabolic resistance gene CYP337B3 is present
in cypermethrin resistant Pakistani strain FSD (Section 2) and fenvalerate resistant
Australian strain TWBR (Joussen et al., 2012) there was a need to find out whether the
pyrethroid resistance in these strains is only due to CYP337B3 or there could be the
involvement of multiple P450 genes. As increased P450 mediated detoxification and
overexpression of multiple P450 genes have been found to be associated with
enhanced metabolic detoxification of insecticides in pyrethroid resistant insects (Brun-
Barale et al., 2010; Yang et al., 2004; Zhang et al., 2010; Zhu et al., 2008). Moreover,
the evolution of different resistance mechanisms by the same species emphasizes the
importance of geographical origin of the strain (Brun-Barale et al., 2010) a variety of
chemical signals induce overexpression of cytochrome P450 genes (Conney, 2003).
For this reason in this study the expression pattern of 64 P450 genes were analysed
both resistant strain (FSD and TWBR) compared to susceptible strain TWBS.
Combined, these genes cover the three fourth of the total P450 genes reported from
Drosophila melanogaster (90 genes (Tijet et al., 2001)), and B. mori (86 genes (Yang
et al., 2006)). P450 genes upregulation was observed in FSD parental strain and two
genes (CYP340G1 and CYP340H1) showed more than ten-fold higher expression
while the expression levels of P450s in TWBR were much more similar to TWBS.
However, previous reports show that overexpression of different P450 genes in
pyrethroid resistant H. armigera is encoded by the gene families, CYP6 and CYP4. An
earlier non-quantitative northern blot analysis shows that in pyrethroid resistant strain
from Australia, CYP6B7, CYP6B2 and CYP6B6 overexpressed followed by the slight
overexpression of CYP4G8 (Pittendrigh et al., 1997; Ranasinghe and Hobbs, 1998) but
CYP6B7 was rejected as a candidate for fenvalerate resistance by Gruber and Heckel,
(2007). Further, cDNA-AFLP analysis in Australian fenvalerate resistant strain AN02
indicates that the overexpressing P450 gene CYP337B1 is tightly linked to the resistant
locus RFen1 (Heckel et al., 1998; Wee et al., 2008). They did not observe
overexpression of CYP6B7, CYP6B2 or CYP6B6 which was previously reported in
Australian strain. Strong overexpression of CYP9A12, CYP9A14 and CYP6B7 was
observed in pyrethroid resistant H. armigera from China (Yang et al., 2006; Zhang et
al., 2010). Significant overexpression of multiple CYP genes CYP4L5, CYP4L11,
Expression profiling of H. armigera CYP450 genes
85
CYP6AE11, CYP332A1, CYP9A14, CYP4M6, CYP4M7, CYP9A12, and CYP337B1
has been reported in deltamethrin resistant H. armigera (Brun-Barale et al., 2010). By
comparing with these results it was found that none of the previously reported
overexpressed genes were found upregulated in FSD or TWBR strain.
This study provides the first report on downregulation of P450 genes in
pyrethroid resistant strain of H. armigera. The genes which showed downregulation
belong to the same P450 gene families and clans (CYP3, CYP4, CYP6 and CYP9).
The extent of downregulation varied from very high to low. The mechanism of P450
downregulation is poorly understood. Many P450 genes are suppressed due to various
endogenous and exogenous compounds in insects and vertebrates (Carvalho et al.,
2010; Davies et al., 2006; Marinotti et al., 2005; Riddick et al., 2004). Complex
transcription factor cascades and regulatory proteins have been reported to be involved
in down regulation of P450 genes (Riddick et al., 2004). Previously proposed
mechanisms responsible for the P450 genes downregulation are: first, a
pathophysiological response to stress stimuli (inflammation, infection and toxin);
second, an adaptive homeostatic response to regulate the controlled generation of P450
derived reactive oxygen species to protect cells from harmful effect; and third, the
dedication of transcriptional machinery in other important physiological pathways
(Morgan, 2001; Yang and Liu, 2011). A similar explanation was given by Yang and
Liu for insecticide resistance in insecticide resistant mosquitoes, Culex
quinquefasciatus; down regulation of P450 occurred to protect insect cells from the
deleterious effects of P450 derived oxidizing species and metabolites of oxidation
reaction which results from the overexpression of cytochrome P450 genes involved in
insecticide resistance.
But after analysing the three P450 genes (CYP340G1, CYP340H1, and
CYP341B2) showing the highest overexpression in FSD were not overexpressed in
backcross progeny receiving the FSD-derived linkage group from the F1 mother,
relative to the backcross progeny receiving the TWBS-derived linkage group. Instead,
the expression levels were equal in these two groups, and similar to the susceptible
TWBS line. Therefore, the overexpression of these P450 genes in the FSD strain is not
linked to cypermethrin resistance in the FSD strain.
Expression profiling of H. armigera CYP450 genes
86
Therefore, in the present case the different expression levels of the P450 genes
studied have no confirmed influence on the level of resistance indicating that the up-
regulation of a gene does not necessarily prove its involvement in the observed
resistance.
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
87
Chapter 5
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistance gene
CYP337B3 in Helicoverpa armigera in pakistan
5.1. Introduction
Subfamily Heliothinae (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) includes several of the world's
major crop pests including Helicoverpa zea, Heliothis virescens and Helicoverpa
armigera. (Mitter et al., 1993). H. armigera feeds and sustains itself on a wide range
of economically important crops including cotton, maize, sorghum, pigeon pea, chick
pea, soybean, groundnut, sunflower and a range of vegetables (King, 1994; Wu et al.,
2008). It is one of the most widely distributed species of the genus Helicoverpa
(Venette et al., 2003), due to the ability of its adults to migrate over several hundred
kilometres (Farrow and Daly, 1987; Rochester et al., 1996; Zhou et al., 2000). It has
been reported that this pest can fly 200-300 kms in one night (Armes and Cooter,
1991) and has been reported in Ascension Island, 2000 kilometers away from the
African coast (Widmer and Schofield, 1983). Moreover, H. armigera is considered a
quarantine pest in South and North America but recent studies have shown its
presence in North and Northeast of Brazil (Czepak et al., 2013; Mastrangelo et al.,
2014) which is an alarming situation for this region.
Along with its migrating capability, H. armigera has a high variability in
number of generations, host plants, diapause and seasonal abundance (Fitt, 1989; Zhou
et al., 2000). Most of the time the damage caused by H. armigera is controlled by both
chemical and biological pesticides (Schnepf et al., 1998) but extensive use of chemical
pesticides has resulted in high levels of resistance (Ahmad, 2007; Endersby et al.,
2007).
This pest is a challenge for ecological and evolutionary studies and its status as
a pest makes it important to understand its demography (Mitter et al., 1993). Different
marker systems, including sodium channel gene analysis (Stokes et al., 1997),
isozymes (Nibouche et al., 1998), randomly amplified fragment length polymorphism
(RFLP) (Zhou et al., 2000), mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) (Behere et al., 2007),
microsatellites (Vassal et al., 2008) and exon primed intron crossing PCR (EPIC-PCR)
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
88
(Behere et al., 2013; Tay et al., 2008) have been used to study genetic diversity in H.
armigera. In Australia sodium channel gene, isozymes and mtDNA markers
polymorphism analysis revealed no or little genetic divergence among widely
dispersed populations of H. armigera, signifying the widespread gene flow (Behere et
al., 2007; Nibouche et al., 1998; Stokes et al., 1997). On the contrary, highly
polymorphic microsatellite marker analysis revealed substantial genetic divergence
among different populations of H. armigera collected from the same locality during
different cropping seasons round the year (Ji et al., 2003; Scott et al., 2005a; Scott et
al., 2005b; Scott et al., 2006). However, using the microsatellite markers, Endersby et
al., (2007) observed no significant genetic divergence in Australian H. armigera
populations. These contradictory findings of microsatellite markers based studies
could be due to mutation in the primers annealing site (allele drop out and null allele)
(Endersby et al., 2007) or possible association with non-long terminal repeats (LTR)
retro-transposable elements (Tay et al., 2010). The limitation of microsatellite markers
was overcome by developing EPIC-PCR markers for H. armigera (Tay et al., 2008).
Moreover, using these markers Behere et al., (2013) have reported significant genetic
differences at host crop, time and geographical levels among different populations of
H. armigera collected from diverse locations in India. EPIC-PCR is a valuable marker
system to investigate population genetic structure of H. armigera but these markers
are still prone to null alleles due to variation in primer binding site of exon regions.
Recently 650 bp from 5ʹ-end of COI gene has been adopted as a universal
marker for identification and diversity analysis of animal species and termed “DNA
barcode”. DNA barcoding has emerged as a rapid and reliable technique for
identification of organisms (Hebert and Gregory, 2005). COI was adopted as a
standard because of its robustness and wide range of phylogenetic signal (Hebert et al.,
2003; Ramadan and Baeshen, 2012). DNA barcoding has been successfully used for
species discrimination in a wide range of animals including insects (Ashfaq et al.,
2013; Ashfaq et al., 2014; Hastings et al., 2008; Hebert et al., 2004). DNA barcoding
of H. armigera can be used as an additional valuable source for population structure
and phylogenetic analysis along with other marker systems. Recently DNA barcoding
has been used for the detection and genetic diversity analysis of H. armigera
populations in Brazil and its demarcation from H. zea (Mastrangelo et al., 2014).
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
89
The study decribed here was intiated to determine genetic variation in H.
armigera populations across Pakistan by DNA barcoding. Another objective of this
study was to develop a DNA barcode reference library for biodiversity analysis and to
understand the population structure and gene flow in H. armigera. In addition, this
study also aimed at elucidating the distribution of the resistant genes CYP337B1,
CYP337B2 and CYP337B3 in H. armigera collected from different geographical
regions of Pakistan.
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
90
5.2. Materials and Methods
5.2.1. Specimen sampling
H. armigera adults and larvae were collected from 37 geographic locations of
Central, Southern and Northern Pakistan during 2010-2013. Ecologically these
collection points are spread across different climatic zones; including desert,
temperate, tropical and subtropical, with varying altitudes 17 m – 2137 m. The larvae
were collected from field crops (Okra, chickpea, trifolium) and mixed shrubs and were
stored at -20°C, while the adults were collected by light trap and were preserved in
collection boxes for subsequent molecular analysis. The collected samples were
recorded during collection in the following order: collector name, date of collection,
location and host plant. The collection sites were mapped using online tool
(http://www.simplemappr.net) along with GPS coordinates.
5.2.2. DNA barcoding
The collected samples were labelled, assigned the specimen numbers and were
photographed before processing for DNA barcoding. Specimen data along with
collection information were submitted to the Barcode of Life Data System (BOLD)
(http://www.boldsystems.org/). A small piece of leg from moth or tissue from larva
was excised with a pair of sterile forceps. The excised tissues were transferred to a 96
well microplate (one specimen per well) containing 30 µL of 95% ethanol in each
well. Amplification and sequencing of the 5′ region of the COI (barcode region) were
performed at the Canadian Centre for DNA Barcoding (CCDB), the Biodiversity
Institute of Ontario (BIO) following standard protocols (Hebert et al., 2003; Ivanova et
al., 2006). In total DNA barcodes from 65 specimens collected from different
locations in Pakistan were sequenced.
5.2.3. Data analysis
COI sequence from each specimen was BLAST searched against the known
barcode sequences in the databases (i.e. GenBank and BOLD) for the similarity
analysis. Previous studies have shown that most lepidopterans show an intraspecific
sequence divergence of ≤2% at CO1 (Hebert et al., 2003; Strutzenberger et al., 2011).
A threshold of 2% sequence divergence was used for the species discrimination.
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
91
Moreover, samples with sequence length less than 500 bp were excluded from the
study. Distance analysis was performed using MEGA5 (Tamura et al., 2011) following
Kimura 2-parameter (K2P) model (Kimura, 1980) and pairwise deletion.
Haplotype groups were determined by DnaSP 5.10 (Librado and Rozas, 2009).
The generated haplotypes were grouped into three populations; Northern, Central and
East Southern Pakistan for analysis of molecular variance (AMOVA). Significance of
variation among and within populations was calculated using Alrequin ver 3.5.1.2
(Excoffier and Lischer, 2010). Minimum spanning trees of 20 haplotypes generated in
Alrequin were used for COI haplotype network using HapStar 0.5 (Teacher and
Griffiths, 2011). Single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers were employed to
determine the population structure and kinship of the collected samples. SNP markers
were retrieved from sequences using MEGA5 and were employed to program
STRUCTURE 2.3.4 (based on Bayesian clustering method) (Falush et al., 2007;
Pritchard et al., 2000). Structure model was used to identify population structure,
admixed individuals and population genetic clusters (K) by using simulation of 10
iterations, with each iteration consisting of 10,000 burnin and run length of 20,000
Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) replications and testing for K = 1 to K = 10. The
structure software results were imported to STRUCTURE HARVESTER software to
calculate exact value of ΔK (Earl and vonHoldt, 2012b)
(http://taylor0.biology.ucla.edu/structureHarvester/).
5.2.4. Screening of CYP337B1, CYP337B2 and CYP337B3 genes
For PCR screening fast tissue-to-PCR kit (Fermentas, Germany) was used. A
small piece of leg from adult or tissue from larval body was mixed with 100 µL of
tissue lysis solution and 10 µL proteinase K solution by vortexing. The reaction
mixture was incubated for 10 min at 25°C, followed by incubation for 3 min at 95°C.
The reaction was neutralized by adding 100 µL of neutralization solution T and mixed
by vortexing. Neutralized tissue extracts were used immediately in PCR.
The allele frequency of CYP337B1, CYP337B2 and CYP337B3 was
determined to estimate the resistance level of the population. The screening of these
genes was done by the method as described earlier (section 3.2.5.2) using 1 to 40
specimens per location.
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
92
5.3. Results
To determine the population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant
gene CYP337B3, in field population of H. armigera in Pakistan. Collection of
specimens was done from 37 different locations across Northern, Central and East
Southern Pakistan (Figure 5.1). The collected H. armigera adults and larvae were
identified initially based on their morphological characteristics. For DNA barcoding
and population structure analysis, COI gene was sequenced from the specimens
collected from 27 locations.
Figure 5.1 Map of Pakistan showing collection localities of Helicoverpa armigera.
Collection points are indicated by black dots. The map was constructed using
(http://www.simplemappr.net)
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
93
5.3.1. Genetic diversity of H. armigera
5.3.1.1. DNA barcoding
COI sequences >500 bp were obtained from 64 H. armigera specimens
collected from 27 locations. The K2P divergence among these sequences was less than
2% (ranged 0.0 to 1.39%). COI divergence between H. armigera from Pakistan and
those from Australia, Europe, Africa and Asia was <2%. The ABGD analyses (Figure
5.2) also found 1 group (prior maximal distance P = 0.001668) in Pakistan H.
armigera.
The sequences from the 64 H. armigera specimens were analysed for number
of expected haplotype groups which revealed 20 H. armigera haplotypes, with
haplotypes diversity 0.829 ± 0.035. Moreover, there were 17 polymorphic sites (SNPs)
among these haplotypes. Haplotype 1 also covers nine different locations with 14
samples from all three geographical regions including Northern Pakistan (Kalam (2),
Mingora (1), Dargai (1) and Shogran (1)), Central Pakistan (Bahawalpur (1),
Faisalabad (2) and Multan (1)) and East Southern Pakistan (Sadiqabad (4) and Sanghar
(1)). Similarly haplotypes 2 covers fifteen different locations with 22 samples from all
three geographical regions; Northern Pakistan (Kalam (1), Peer Chinasi (1), Charsada
(1), Dassu (1) and Muree (1)), Central Pakistan (Khewra (3), Bahawalpur (3),
Faisalabad (1), Lahore (1) and Jehlum (1)) and East Southern Pakistan (Sadiqabad (3),
Hatango Khupru (1), Jamaro (1), Karchat (1) and Sanghar (1)). Halpotype 3 cover one
location (Faisalabad (1), Haplotype 4, cover five different locations with 5 specimens
from Northern and Central geographical regions; Nothern Pakistan (Besham (1) and
Balakot (1)) and Chiniot (1), Bahawalpur (1) and Sadiqabad (1)), Halpotype 5 cover
one location (Faisalabad (1). Haplotype 6 and 7 cover four different locations with 4
DNA barcoded specimens from Northern and Central geographical regions; Haplotype
6 (Dasu (1), Mansehra (1), Khewara (1) and Faisalabad (1)) and Haplotype 7 (Balakot
(1), Bhakkar (1), Bahawalpur (1) and Sadiqabad (1). The remaining fifteen haplotypes
contain one sequence each, in which six haplotypes; Haplotype 10 (Sadiqabad),
Haplotype 12 (Dargai), Haplotype 13 (Charsadda), Haplotype 18 (Gilgit) and
Haplotype 19 (Shogran) and Haplotype 20 (Muree) are present in one branch of
haplotype tree while nine haplotypes; Haplotype 8 (Khewra), Haplotype 9
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
94
(Bahawalpur), Haplotype 11 (Kel), Haplotype 14 (Bhakkar), Haplotype 15 (Nagar
Parkar), Haplotype 16 (Jehlum) and Haplotype 17 (Jamorao) are present on the other
branch.
AMOVA was performed using haplotype data derived from DnaSP 5.10. The
analysis (Table 5.1) revealed that H. armigera populations from different geographic
regions of Pakistan showed similar level of genetic variability regardless of their
origin (-0.00587% population variance). Moreover, the population variations among
those within geographic regions and within populations were 5.12% and 95.46%,
respectively, but these variations were not significant. Arlequin output data file of 20
haplotypes was used for the construction of a minimum spanning tree using HapStar.
Figure 5.3 shows that the haplotypes were clustered into two groups connected
through haplotype 6. Moreover, the tree did not show any link between haplotypes and
geographic region and indicated that H. armigera across Pakistan belongs to a single
species and that there is a possibility that the Pakistani H. armigera populations
originated from two ancestors.
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
95
Table 5.1 Comparisons between geographic regions (Northern Pakistan, Central Pakistan and East Southern Pakistan) by AMOVA using COI
gene sequences of Helicoverpa armigera.
Model Hierarchical levels Degree of
freedom Sum of square Variance components Fixation indices
Percentage of
variation P-value
Geographical
Regions
Among Groups 2 1.901 -0.00536 -0.00587 FCT -0.59 0.47801
Among populations
within groups 24 23.340 0.04676 0.05092 FSC 5.12 0.32063
Within populations 37 32.249 0.87159 -0.04535 FST 95.46
0.24633
Total 63 57.490 0.91300
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
96
Figure 5.2 Distance analysis; pairwise distance divergence (%) of Helicoverpa
armigera from Pakistan as generated by ABGD (Puillandre et al., 2012)
Figure 5.3 HapStar profile of COI gene haplotypes tree of Helicoverpa armigera from
Pakistan. Haplotype number and frequency is indicated inside and besides the
corresponding circle, respectively.
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
97
5.3.2. Population structure
Haplotypes polymorphic sites SNPs from DnaSP were used to calculate model-
based simulation of population structure. For analysis the population genetic clusters
(K) was selected from 1 to 20 based on calculated number of haplotypes. Results
indicated that at maximum likelihood and minimum α best K value was calculated as
K = 2 with highest ΔK value (Figure 5.4a and b). At K = 2 the mean value of α was
0.0613 with Fst value for group-I and II was 0.53 and 0.51 respectively. Further there
were 100% admixed ancestry because no pure inbreed was found (Figure 5.4b).
The second maximum value of ΔK was recorded at K = 4 (Figure 5.4c) with α
value 0.0397. The 64 samples broke up into four groups and the Fst values of Group I,
II, III and VI were 0.0370, 0.6000, 0.8054 and 0.7127, respectively. Similarly at this
value no pure inbreed of H. armigera was present in all the analysed samples.
Moreover, no specificity of any particular group was observed with any of the
geographic region of Pakistan (Northern, Central and East Southern).
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
98
Figure 5.4 STRUCTURE analysis results of Helicoverpa armigera populations
collected from Pakistan based on SNPs. (a) Graph showing K = 2 as suspected
population (b) Bar graph of all 65 individuals at K = 2 (c) Bar graph of all 65
individuals at K = 4.
(a)
(c)
a.
b.
c.
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
99
5.3.3. Geographical distribution of H. armigera pyrethroids resistant
(CYP337B3) and susceptible genes (CYP337B1 and CYP337B2) in Pakistan
All the collected individuals from 37 different sites were tested for the
presence of pyrethroid resistance gene CYP337B3 and its parental genes CYP337B1
and CYP337B2 by PCR using the primers already successfully used for the FSD strain
(Table 3.1). PCR screening revealed that a high frequency of CYP337B3 (100%) is
present in H. armigera populations across Pakistan (Figure 5.5, Table 5.2). The
parental genes CYP337B1 and CYP337B2 were not detected in Pakistani populations
of H. armigera.
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
100
Table 5.2 Distribution of CYP337B1, CYP337B2 and CYP337B3 genes across
Pakistan
Province/State Region CYP337B1 CYP337B2 CYP337B3
Gilgit Baltistan Gilgit - - +
Dassu - - +
Azad Kashmir
Kel - - +
Peer Chinassi - - +
Shahdarra - - +
Ath Maqam - - +
Rawalakot - - +
Ghari Dupatta - - +
Khyber Pakhtunkhwa
Kalam, Swat - - +
Manglawer, Swat - - +
Matta, Swat - - +
Dargai, Malakand - - +
Charsada - - +
Besham - - +
Balakot - - +
Shogran - - +
Mansehra - - +
Changla Gali - - +
Punjab
Muree - - +
Khewra - - +
Jehlum - - +
Mian Channu - - +
Chiniot - - +
Faisalabad - - +
Lahore - - +
DG Khan - - +
Mankara - - +
Multan - - +
Sadiqabad - - +
Bahawalpur - - +
Sindh
Sanghar - - +
Hatango Khupru - - +
Nagar Parkar - - +
Jamrao - - +
Karchat - - +
Mithi - - +
Islamabad Islamabad (Capital) - - +
(+) gene present, (-) gene absent
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
101
Figure 5.5 PCR screening for the presence or absence of CYP337B1, CYP337B2 and
CYP337B3 in collected samples. A representative gel picture of PCR screening of
larvae collected from Swat. a. CYP337B1 gene, b. CYP337B2 gene and c. CYP337B3.
Lane 1-36 (Helicoverpa armigera larvae), Lane –ve (negative control, without
template DNA) and Lane +ve (positive control, CYP337B3 containing plasmid).
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
102
5.4. Discussion
In present study the DNA barcoding was used for species identification,
genetic divergence and population genetic structure of H. armigera and to determine
the possible relationship between genetic structure and pyrethroid resistance. The
DNA barcode analysis of 64 different locations of Northern, Central and East
Southern Pakistan strongly support that all these samples are conspecific to H.
armigera. Normally it is estimated that sequence divergence among lepidopterans
remains low (Caterino et al., 2000; Hebert et al., 2003) and DNA barcoding results of
the current study are adequate to support recognition of the divergence. The calculated
sequence divergence (K2P and p-distance) was from 0.00% to 1.39% (<2%). Using
this threshold value (<2%) of DNA barcoding, H. armigera has been successfully
identified and discriminated among lepedopteran species in Brazil (Mastrangelo et al.,
2014) and China (Li et al., 2011).
The proposed threshold value of sequence divergence to classify insect and
mammal species is from 2-3% (Hebert et al., 2003). However, the rate of genetic
changes between classes is a dynamic process (Rubinoff et al., 2006), thus sequence
divergence could be extremely fluid. Variation in species threshold value could be
possible among different lepidopteran studies; as in case of skipper butterflies (Hebert
et al., 2004) the threshold value was low (0.32%), while in case of Ithoninae butterflies
(Whinnett et al., 2005) it was higher (0.23 to 6.4%).
Further, the haplotype analysis (Figure 5.3) depicts that there is no specific
haplotype linked to both within and across geographical regions (Northen, Central and
East Southern) of Pakistan. Similarly, AMOVA analysis revealed that variation
present among groups and different populations are non-significant, indicating that
these haplotypes have wide geographic distribution, thus confirming the long distance
migration of H. armigera (Farrow and Daly, 1987; Rochester et al., 1996; Zhou et al.,
2000).
For more comprehensive grouping of H. armigera populations in Pakistan
model based population structure analysis was performed which in comparison to
phylogenetic analysis model based genetic structure gives more comprehensive
grouping (Goldstein, 1991). The population structure analysis using SNP markers
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
103
showed maximum likelihood of ΔK when K = 2. However, there was 100% admixed
ancestry because no pure inbreed was found (Figure 5.4b) and low population
structure. These results further validate that the H. armigera population found in
Pakistan is homozygous and no significant population substructure exists with respect
to specific geographic region.
However, using different molecular techniques, many studies have shown
similar patterns of genetic variation in insect pests due to their ability to migrate over
long distances such as H. armigera. Using isozyme allele no significant genetic
variation was detected between Australian H. armigera populations collected within
3,000 km range (Daly and Gregg, 1985). Using the same molecular technique samples
collected from both sides of the Sahara desert showed very small variation, indicating
that even desert cannot bar long-distance movement of H. armigera (Nibouche et al.,
1998). Similarly using RAPD-PCR technique, no significant genetic variation between
Israeli and Turkish H. armigera population was found (Zhou et al., 2000). Using
microsatellite loci, Endersby et al., (2007) reported that there is no evident genetic
structure present in H. armigera populations from Australia and New Zealand.
Similarly the partial mtDNA COI data of H. armigera from Asia, Australia and Africa
showed low nucleotide diversity and Fst values (Behere et al., 2007). In India no
significant population structure was found in H. armigera populations collected from
different crops irrespective of cropping season using EPIC-PCR markers (Behere et
al., 2013).
Based on the findings that CYP337B3 is responsible for metabolic resistance
against cypermethrin in Pakistani H. armigera (Chapter 3), the present study was
focused to determine the frequency of resistance gene (CYP337B3) and its parental
pyrethroid susceptible genes (CYP337B1 and CYP337B2) in the H. armigera
populations in Pakistan. The results indicated that only CYP337B3 gene was detected
whereas no susceptible genes were present in the analyzed specimens. Thus the
CYP337B3 gene was considered to be responsible for pyrethroids resistance and found
to be extremely common and wide-spread in field collected H. armigera from
Pakistan. Moreover, wide spread applications of synthetic pyrethroids across Pakistan
is assumed to be responsible for the presence of only resistant parent in Pakistan
instead of both resistant and susceptible parents. Although there could be more than
Population structure and frequency of pyrethroid resistant gene CYP337B3
104
one resistance mechanisms (cuticular penetration, target site and metabolic) in H.
armigera (Ahmad et al., 1989; Gunning, 2006; Gunning et al., 1995; Gunning et al.,
1991) but CYP337B3 gene (metabolic resistance) seems to be underlining the most
common resistance mechanism present in Pakistani populations of H. armigera.
However, proper screening of pyrethroid resistant gene (CYP337B3) and
understanding the population structure of this invasive pest is essential for its effective
control and quick response to any incursion, and to invistigate that whether the
CYP337B3 gene evolved in Australia or it was already present throughout the world?
Giving us a clue that might be CYP337B3 gene evolved in Australia and this resistant
strain reached to Pakistan through agricultural products. But still there is a need, to
screen the presence of pyrethroid resistant (CYP337B3) and susceptible genes
(CYP337B1 and CYP337B2) in different geographical regions; mainly Asia, Australia
and Africa to confirm the origin of this new resistant chimeric gene.
Overall, the present study reveals that pyrethroid resistance gene CYP337B3 is
present in all collected samples of H. armigera across Pakistan but sill there is need to
screen H. armigera populations from all geographical locations of Pakistan. While the
populations from Northern, Central and East Southern of Pakistan under significant
gene flow indicating that this migratory pest is not restricted to specific geographic
region.
Chapter 6 General Discussion
105
Chapter 6
General Discussion
The increasing level of insecticide resistance in insect pests limit their control
and threatens agriculture. A number of mechanisms of resistance against pyrethroids
have been reported in H. armigera, including target site insensitivity (Gunning, 1996;
McCaffery, 1998), metabolism by carboxylesterases (Gunning, 1996; Gunning et al.,
1999; Gunning et al., 2007; Young et al., 2005; Young et al., 2006), and activiation of
P450s (Brun-Barale et al., 2010; Daly and Fisk, 1992; Heckel et al., 1998; Pittendrigh
et al., 1997; Ranasinghe et al., 1998; Ranasinghe and Hobbs, 1998; Ranasinghe and
Hobbs, 1999; Wee et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2004).
Recently, it has been reported that a new P450 gene, CYP337B3, emerged by
unequal crossing-over between CYP337B1 and CYP337B2 from the Australian
fenvalerate resistant H. armigera strain TWB (Joussen et al., 2012). This study
revealed the presence of the same gene in cypermethrin-resistant H. armigera in
Pakistan and suggest that the gene is evidently not restricted to Australian populations
as previously thought. Full-length cloning and sequencing revealed a number of
sequence differences between the Pakistani CYP337B3 and the Australian
CYP337B3v1(Figure 6.1). The two alleles differ by three nonsynonymous SNPs and
the resulting differences in the deduced amino acid sequence located at the C-terminus
reflect the differences previously described between the CYP337B1 allozymes
(Joussen et al., 2012). Thus, the Australian CYP337B3v1 resembles CYP337B1v1 or
CYP337B1v3 at its 3‟ end, while the Pakistani CYP337B3 resembles CYP337B1v4.
Furthermore, it is possible that the unequal crossover event shifted a few nucleotides
up-stream of the proposed position of the Australian CYP337B3v1 (Joussen et al.,
2012). In addition, the intron differs in length and sequence between the Pakistani
CYP337B3 (1017 bp) and the Australian CYP337B3v1 (921 bp). Taking all three lines
of evidence, it is likely that rather than individuals of H. armigera carrying CYP337B3
from Australia to Pakistan or vice versa, CYP337B3 instead evolved independently
twice by unequal crossing-over between CYP337B2 and two different CYP337B1
alleles. The very similar crossover region was most likely favoured by a longer stretch
of sequence identity between CYP337B1 and CYP337B2. However, the verification of
Chapter 6 General Discussion
106
this hypothesis is hampered by the fact that the parental genes, CYP337B1 and
CYP337B2, have so far not been found in Pakistani populations. The parental genes
were probably selected against due to high selection pressure by pyrethroids, which
selects for individuals homozygous for CYP337B3 which consequently have lost
CYP337B1 and CYP337B2, because only heterozygous individuals can possess all
three genes (Joussen et al., 2012).
The slightly different amino acid sequence of the Pakistani CYP337B3 seems
to have no impact on its metabolic capacity against pyrethroids compared to the
Australian CYP337B3v1. The heterologous enzyme showed a similar activity towards
the model substrates tested and acts in the same position on cypermethrin as the
Australian CYP337B3v1 acts on fenvalerate resulting in 4'-hydroxycypermethrin
identified as the main metabolite. The formation of the corresponding metabolite could
be explained by the fact that fenvalerate and cypermethrin share the same
phenoxybenzyl alcohol moiety. It is known that larvae of H. virescens and H.
armigera are capable of metabolizing trans-cypermethrin by hydrolysis to trans-3-
(2,2-dichloroethenyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane carboxylic acid and by oxidation to
2'- and 4'-hydroxy-trans-cypermethrin (Lee et al., 1989; Little et al., 1989). Both cis-
and trans-cypermethrin are oxidatively metabolized by mouse liver microsomes
mainly to 4'-hydroxycypermethrin, but also to 5-hydroxycypermethrin and trans-
hydroxymethyl-cypermethrin, that are further oxidized to the corresponding aldehydes
and carboxylic acids (Shono et al., 1979). Carboxylesterases of the gut and the
integument of Trichoplusia ni larvae hydrolyse trans-cypermethrin two- to six-fold
faster than cis-cypermethrin (Ishaaya and Casida, 1980). Current findings support the
observations that cis-isomers of cypermethrin are more sensitive to oxidation than
trans-isomers (Shono et al., 1979) as CYP337B3 is more active on cis-cypermethrin
than on trans-cypermethrin.
Toxicity bioassays including the resistant FSD strain, the resistant TWBR line,
and the susceptible TWBS line revealed a 7- and 6-fold resistance, respectively, for the
resistant larvae vs the susceptible larvae demonstrating similar resistance levels in the
Pakistani strain and the resistant Australian line (Chapter 3). This indicates that the
resistance level observed is most likely due to the metabolic activity of CYP337B3,
Chapter 6 General Discussion
107
because the presence of CYP337B3 is the most important difference between the
resistant and the susceptible lines.
Comparison of resistance levels indicates that other mechanisms, including
target-site insensitivity, may be important in other pyrethroid-resistant strains of H.
armigera. The cypermethrin-resistance level observed in the FSD strain is much lower
than that reported by Yang et al., (2004) for the Pakistani field-collected strain PAK of
H. armigera (RF: 4,100), by Alvi et al., (2012) for another Pakistani population (RF:
1,949), by Forrester et al., (1993) for an Australian strain (RF: 25) and by Ahmad and
McCaffery, (1999) for a resistant Thai strain (RF: 20) (to trans-cypermethrin). Tan
and McCaffery, (2007) described a 182-fold resistance of the Chinese H. armigera
strain CMR to cypermethrin, a 487-fold resistance to cis-cypermethrin and an 86-fold
resistance to trans-cypermethrin. Because the resistance factor is calculated by the
division of the LD50 of the resistant strain by the LD50 of the susceptible strain, both an
increased LD50 of the resistant strain and a decreased LD50 of the susceptible strain
may lead to an increased resistance factor. A comparison of the LD50 of the Pakistani
FSD (532ng/larva) to the Chinese CMR (310 ng/larva) regarding cypermethrin reveals
that FSD is more resistant than CMR. The RF reported by Tan and McCaffery, (2007)
is higher because they compared the CMR strain to the extremely susceptible Reading
strain, a laboratory strain that was collected more than 20 years ago in South Africa,
possessing a LD50 of 2ng per larva while the susceptible TWBS line possesses a LD50
of 77ng per larva, thus being 39-fold more resistant than Reading. However, the
Pakistani PAK strain exhibits a LD50 of 23,752ng per larva (Yang et al., 2004) and is
thus 45-fold more resistant than the FSD strain. The susceptible laboratory SCD strain
used by Yang et al., (2004), which was originally collected from the Cote D‟Ivoire in
the 1970s and was provided by Bayer Crop Science, possesses a LD50 of 5.8ng per
larva so that it is 13-fold less resistant than the susceptible TWBS line. The resistance
level of FSD can be suppressed by PBO to the resistance level found in TWBS but not
below this level. This indicates that FSD has a basal resistance level similar to TWBS
but is more resistant because of the presence of CYP337B3, and that FSD and TWB
have an additional resistance mechanism compared to Reading and SCD that is not
suppressible by PBO.
Chapter 6 General Discussion
108
The AFLP analysis in the backcross of FSD with TWBS did not identify any
further genes in addition to CYP337B3 contributing to the cypermethrin resistance of
the FSD strain (Chapter 3). The phenotype of resistance, and the CYP337B3 gene,
were both mapped to the linkage group homologous to B. mori Chromosome 15, while
expression differences of other P450s were not influenced by this linkage group. This
shows that up-regulation of a P450 gene in a resistant strain does not necessarily prove
its involvement in resistance (as previously pointed out by Brun-Barale et al., (2010)
for African H. armigera). Although rarely attempted, testing for linkage between the
phenotype of resistance and the phenotype of P450 expression level is important. Not
only that this test can rule out involvement of upregulation in resistance (e.g. Grubor
and Heckel, (2007) for CYP6B enzymes in Australian pyrethroid-resistant H.
armigera), it can also confirm the role of upregulation. For example, in the classic
case of P450-mediated insecticide resistance in the housefly, the genetic factor causing
constitutive overexpression of CYP6A1 maps to the same locus determining diazinon
resistance, while the diazinon-metabolizing CYP6A1 itself maps to a different
chromosome (Cariño et al., 1994; Cohen et al., 1994; Sabourault et al., 2001).
Multiple origins of the same insecticide resistance mechanism have been
convincingly documented by recent studies in other organisms. Identical point
mutations in the voltage-gated sodium channel, the primary target of pyrethroid
insecticides, have been found associated with different haplotypes in different
geographical regions, in mosquitoes (Pinto et al., 2007) and in houseflies (Rinkevich
et al., 2012). Similarly, distinctly different haplotype backgrounds have been found to
harbour the same point mutations in an esterase gene conferring organophosphorus
resistance in the sheep blowfly (Newcomb et al., 2005). Such examples are rare,
although not unexpected in cases where a single amino acid substitution can confer
target-site insensitivity, or dramatically alter the substrate specificity of an enzyme.
The background nucleotide substitution rate would be the rate-limiting factor in the
occurrence of such multiple origins. Although in the current study the background rate
of unequal crossing-over was estimated because it is likely to be much lower; attesting
to the powerful selective force of insecticide resistance in bringing these extremely
rare events to the fore. These findings greatly increase the importance of this
Chapter 6 General Discussion
109
resistance mechanism, which may play a prominent role in the pyrethroid resistance of
H. armigera worldwide.
After screening different populations of H. armigera across Pakistan, only
CYP337B3 gene was found, indicating that Pakistani strain has evolved the resistance
gene. As there could be more than one resistance mechanisms (cuticular penetration,
target site and metabolic) in H. armigera (Ahmad et al., 1989; Gunning, 2006;
Gunning et al., 1995; Gunning et al., 1991) but CYP337B3 gene (metabolic
resistance), the study underlines the most common resistance mechanism present in all
Pakistani populations of this insect. After finding that parental susceptible genes
(CYP337B1 and CYP337B2) are lacking in indigenous population of H. armigera in
Pakistan, the question arose that where in the world the evolutionary process of
chimeric CYP337B3 gene formation occurred. Genetic divergence and population
genetic structure analysis strongly support that different populations of H. armigera in
Pakistan are conspecific. Although the population structure analysis using SNP
markers showed that there could be two possible ancestors from which current
population of H. armigera derived but still 100% admixed ancestry was found because
no pure inbreed was found and the population structure was low. These results further
authenticate that the H. armigera population found in Pakistan is homozygous and no
significant population substructure with respect to specific geographic region exist.
These results support the presence of only one type of strain (resistant containing
CYP337B3 gene) instead of both resistant and susceptible strain. Thus there is a need
to screen the H. armigera population at global level. The finding that the presence or
absence of CYP337B3 can be easily detected in a population by a simple PCR
screening provides a tool to rapidly distinguish resistant from the susceptible H.
armgira populations in the field.
Chapter 6 General Discussion
110
Figure 6.1 Alignment of CYP337B3v1 from Australian and CYP337B3 from
Pakistani Helicoverpa armigera with the CYP337B1 alleles and CYP337B2. For
clarity, only the 21 nucleotides that differ between both CYP337B3 alleles are shown.
There are more SNPs between the alleles of CYP337B1 and CYP337B2, respectively.
Both CYP337B3 alleles are compared to CYP337B2 (blue) at their 5′ ends and to the
CYP337B1 alleles CYP337B1v1/v3 (green) and CYP337B1v4 (red) at their 3′ ends. All
nucleotides of the CYP337B3v1 and CYP337B3, which match the nucleotides of one
of the genes or alleles they are compared to, are highlighted in the respective colour.
Nonsynonymous SNPs are framed. The putative region of the unequal crossing-over
event is highlighted in grey.
RECOMMENDATIONS/ FUTURE WORK
111
Recommendations/ Future Work
As CYP337B3 is mainly responsible for pyrethroid resistance in H. armigera, the
CYP337B1, CYP337B2 and CYP337B3 may be considered as screening markers for
evaluating pyrethroid resistant field population in Pakistan. The characterization of the
CYP337B-subfamily of H. armigera in more depth will help to obtain a suitable tool
for advising farmers regarding the control of pyrethroid-resistant populations. These
goals will be approached by
1. Elucidation of the structure-function relationship of CYP337B3 and its parental
enzyme CYP337B1, and within the CYP337B1 allozymes by site-directed
mutagenesis and docking modeling. To explore the possibility to mutate CYP337B3
by changing one or several amino acids to a CYP337B1-like enzyme so that it loses its
capability of metabolizing cypermethrin.
2. Identification of common structural moieties of pyrethroid favoring cross-
resistance in FSD via detoxification by CYP337B3. To determine which structure
moieties are necessary for pyrethroid insecticides for being metabolized by
CYP337B3 related to cross-resistance of FSD strain.
3. Determination of the geographical distribution of CYP337B3 in field populations
of H. armigera and closely related species (Spodoptera littoralis) in Pakistan. That
CYP337B3 could be detected in field populations of H. armigera and closely related
species in different countries indicate a more common resistance mechanism toward
pyrethroid insecticides and if so what is the allele frequency of this resistance gene and
its sequence variation.
Chapter 7 References
112
Chapter 7
References
Abate, T., Ampofo, J.K.O., 1996. Insect pests of beans in Africa: Their ecology and
management. Annu Rev Entomol 41, 45-73.
Abate , T., van Huis, A., Ampofo, J.K.O., 2000. Pest management strategies in
traditional agriculture: An African perspective. Annu Rev Entomol 45, 631-659.
Achaleke, J., Martin, T., Ghogomu, R.T., Vaissayre, M., Brévault, T., 2009. Esterase-
mediated resistance to pyrethroids in field populations of Helicoverpa armigera
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from Central Africa. Pest Manag Sci 65, 1147-1154.
Agusti, N., De Vicente, M.C., Gabarra, R., 1999. Development of sequence amplified
characterized region (SCAR) markers of Helicoverpa armigera: a new polymerase
chain reaction-based technique for predator gut analysis. Mol Ecol 8, 1467-1474.
Aheer, G.M., Aziz, M.A., Hameed, A., Ali, A., 2009. Evaluation of resistance to
different insecticides in field strains of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera:
Noctuidae) in Punjab, Pakistan. Entomol Res 39, 159-167.
Ahmad, M., 2004. Potentiation/antagonism of deltamethrin and cypermethrins with
organophosphate insecticides in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pestic Biochem Physiol 80, 31-42.
Ahmad, M., 2007. Insecticide resistance mechanisms and their management in
Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) a review. J Agric Res 45, 319-335.
Ahmad, M., Arif, I.M., Ahmad, Z., 1995. Monitoring insecticide resistance of
Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Pakistan. J Econ Entomol 88, 771-
776.
Ahmad, M., Arif, M.I., Attique, M.R., 1997. Pyrethroid resistance of Helicoverpa
armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Pakistan. Bull Entomol Res 87, 343-347.
Chapter 7 References
113
Ahmad, M., Denholm, I., Bromilow, R.H., 2006. Delayed cuticular penetration and
enhanced metabolism of deltamethrin in pyrethroid-resistant strains of Helicoverpa
armigera from China and Pakistan. Pest Manag Sci 62, 805-810.
Ahmad, M., Gladwell, R.T., McCaffery, A.R., 1989. Decreased nerve sensitivity is a
mechanism of resistance in a pyrethroid resistant strain of Heliothis armigera from
Thailand. Pestic Biochem Physiol 35, 165-171.
Ahmad, M., McCaffery, A.R., 1999. Penetration and metabolism of trans-
cypermethrin in a susceptible and a pyrethroid-resistant strain of Helicoverpa
armigera. Pestic Biochem Physiol 65, 6-14.
Aller, S.G., Yu, J., Ward, A., Weng, Y., Chittaboina, S., Zhuo, R., Harrell, P.M.,
Trinh, Y.T., Zhang, Q., Urbatsch, I.L., 2009. Structure of P-glycoprotein reveals a
molecular basis for poly-specific drug binding. Science 323, 1718-1722.
Alvi, A.H., Sayyed, A.H., Naeem, M., Ali, M., 2012. Field evolved resistance in
Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Bacillus thuringiensis toxin
Cry1Ac in Pakistan. PloS One 7, e47309.
Andreev, D., Rocheleau, T., Phillips, T.W., Beeman, R.W., 1994. A PCR diagnostic
for cyclodiene insecticide resistance in the red flour beetle Tribolium castaneum.
Pestic Sci 41, 345-349.
Andrews, M.C., Callaghan, A., Field, L.M., Williamson, M.S., Moores, G.D., 2004.
Identification of mutations conferring insecticide-insensitive AChE in the cotton-
melon aphid, Aphis gossypii Glover. Insect Mol Biol 13, 555-561.
Armes, N.J., Cooter, R.J., 1991. Effects of age and mated status on flight potential of
Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Physiol Entomol 16, 131-144.
Ashfaq, M., Akhtar, S., Khan, A.M., Adamowicz, S.J., Hebert, P.D., 2013. DNA
barcode analysis of butterfly species from Pakistan points towards regional endemism.
Mol Ecol Resour 13, 832-843.
Chapter 7 References
114
Ashfaq, M., Hebert, P.D.N., Mirza, J.H., Khan, A.M., Zafar, Y., Mirza, M.S., 2014.
Analyzing Mosquito (Diptera: Culicidae) Diversity in Pakistan by DNA Barcoding.
PLoS ONE 9, e97268.
Behere, G.T., Tay, W.T., Russell, D.A., Heckel, D.G., Appleton, B.R., Kranthi, K.R.,
Batterham, P., 2007. Mitochondrial DNA analysis of field populations of Helicoverpa
armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and of its relationship to Helicoverpa zea. BMC
Evol Biol 7, 117.
Behere, G.T., Tay, W.T., Russell, D.A., Kranthi, K.R., Batterham, P., 2013.
Population genetic structure of the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in India as inferred from EPIC-PCR DNA markers. PLoS
ONE 8, e53448.
Behura, S.K., 2006. Molecular marker systems in insects: current trends and future
avenues. Mol Ecol 15, 3087-3113.
Benson, K.R., 2001. TH Morgan's resistance to the chromosome theory. Nat Rev
Genet 2, 469-474.
Black, I., W. C., Vontas, J.G., 2007. Affordable assays for genotyping single
nucleotide polymorphisms in insects. Insect Mol Biol 16, 377-387.
Bon, M., Hoelmer, K., Coutinot, D., Ramualde, N., 2008. PCR-based, rapid diagnosis
of parasitism of Lygus spp.(Hemiptera: Miridae) by Peristenus relictus (Hymenoptera:
Braconidae). Biocontrol Sci Technol 18, 505-516.
Botstein, D., White, R.L., Skolnick, M., Davis, R.W., 1980. Construction of a genetic
linkage map in man using restriction fragment length polymorphisms. Am J Hum
Genet 32, 314.
Bradford, M.M., 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of microgram
quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal Biochem 72,
248-254.
Brown, T.M., Bryson, P.K., 1992. Selective inhibitors of methyl parathion-resistant
acetylcholinesterase from Heliothis virescens. Pestic Biochem Physiol 44, 155-164.
Chapter 7 References
115
Brun-Barale, A., Bouvier, J.-C., Pauron, D., Bergé, J.-B., Sauphanor, B., 2005.
Involvement of a sodium channel mutation in pyrethroid resistance in Cydia
pomonella L, and development of a diagnostic test. Pest Manag Sci 61, 549-554.
Brun-Barale, A., Héma, O., Martin, T., Suraporn, S., Audant, P., Sezutsu, H.,
Feyereisen, R., 2010. Multiple P450 genes overexpressed in deltamethrin-resistant
strains of Helicoverpa armigera. Pest Manag Sci 66, 900-909.
Buntjer, J., Otsen, M., Nijman, I., Kuiper, M., Lenstra, J., 2002. Phylogeny of bovine
species based on AFLP fingerprinting. Heredity 88, 46-51.
Busvine, J.R., 1971. The biochemical and genetic bases of insecticide resistance. Trop
Pest Manag 17, 135-146.
Butler, D., 2011. Mosquitoes score in chemical war. Nature 275, 19.
Cariño, F.A., Koener, J.F., Plapp Jr, F.W., Feyereisen, R., 1994. Constitutive
overexpression of the cytochrome P450 gene CYP6A1 in a house fly strain with
metabolic resistance to insecticides. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 24, 411-418.
Carvalho, R., Azeredo-Espin, A.M., Torres, T., 2010. Deep sequencing of New World
screw-worm transcripts to discover genes involved in insecticide resistance. BMC
Genomics 11, 695.
Caterino, M.S., Cho, S., Sperling, F.A., 2000. The current state of insect molecular
systematics: a thriving Tower of Babel. Annu Rev Entomol 45, 1-54.
Clarke, T., Ottea, J.A., 1997. Expression and inheritance of target site resistance to
pyrethroids in the tobacco budworm, Heliothis virescens. Pro Belt Cott Confe 2, 1011-
1013.
Cohen, M.B., Keener, J.F., Feyereisen, R., 1994. Structure and chromosomal
localization of CYP6A1, a cytochrome P450-encoding gene from the house fly. Gene
146, 267-272.
Conney, A.H., 2003. Induction of drug-metabolizing enzymes: A path to the discovery
of multiple cytochromes P450. Annu Rev Pharmacol Toxicol 43, 1-30.
Chapter 7 References
116
Cunningham, J.P., West, S.A., Wright, D.J., 1998. Learning in the nectar foraging
behaviour of Helicoverpa armigera. Ecol Entomol 23, 363-369.
Cunningham, J.P., Zalucki, M.P., 2014. Understanding Heliothine (Lepidoptera:
Heliothinae) Pests: What is a Host Plant? J Econ Entomol 107, 881-896.
Czepak, C., Albernaz, K.C., Vivan, L.M., Guimarães, H.O., Carvalhais, T., 2013. First
reported occurrence of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in
Brazil. Pesqui Agropecu Trop 43, 110-113.
Daly, J.C., Fisk, J.H., 1992. Inheritance of metabolic resistance to the synthetic
pyrethroids in Australian Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bull
Entomol Res 82, 5-12.
Daly, J.C., Gregg, P., 1985. Genetic variation in Heliothis in Australia: species
identification and gene flow in the two pest species H. armigera (Hübner) and H.
punctigera Wallengren (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bull Entomol Res 75, 169-184.
Davies, L., Williams, D.R., Aguiar-Santana, I.A., Pedersen, J., Turner, P.C., Rees,
H.H., 2006. Expression and down-regulation of cytochrome P450 genes of the CYP4
family by ecdysteroid agonists in Spodoptera littoralis and Drosophila melanogaster.
Insect Biochem Mol Biol 36, 801-807.
Davies, T.G.E., Field, L.M., Usherwood, P.N.R., Williamson, M.S., 2007. DDT,
pyrethrins, pyrethroids and insect sodium channels. IUBMB Life 59, 151-162.
De Marchi, M., Dalvit, C., Targhetta, C., Cassandro, M., 2006. Assessing genetic
diversity in indigenous Veneto chicken breeds using AFLP markers. Anim Genet 37,
101-105.
Dear, P.H., 2001. Genome Mapping. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Devine, G., 2009. Global pesticide resistance in Arthropods. Entomol Exp Appl 131,
106-106.
Duangkaew, P., Pethuan, S., Kaewpa, D., Boonsuepsakul, S., Sarapusit, S.,
Rongnoparut, P., 2011. Characterization of mosquito CYP6P7 and CYP6AA3:
Chapter 7 References
117
differences in substrate preference and kinetic properties. Arch Insect Biochem
Physiol 76, 236-248.
Eilenberg, J., 2002. Biology of fungi from the order Entomophthorales: with emphasis
on the genera Entomophthora, Strongwellsea and Eryniopsis : a contribution to insect
pathology and biological control. The Royal Veterinary and Agricultural University,
Department of Ecology.
Ellegren, H., 2004. Microsatellites: simple sequences with complex evolution. Nat
Rev Genet 5, 435-445.
Enayati, A.A., Ranson, H., Hemingway, J., 2005. Insect glutathione transferases and
insecticide resistance. Insect Mol Biol 14, 3-8.
Endersby, N., Hoffmann, A., McKechnie, S., Weeks, A., 2007. Is there genetic
structure in populations of Helicoverpa armigera from Australia? Entomol Exp Appl
122, 253-263.
Ensley, S., 2007. Pyrethrins and pyrethroids, in: Ramesh, C.G. (Ed.), Veterinary
toxicology. Academic Press, Oxford, pp. 494-498.
Excoffier, L., Lischer, H.E., 2010. Arlequin suite ver 3.5: a new series of programs to
perform population genetics analyses under Linux and Windows. Molecular ecology
resources 10, 564-567.
Falush, D., Stephens, M., Pritchard, J.K., 2007. Inference of population structure using
multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes 7, 574-
578.
Faria, M.R.d., Wraight, S.P., 2007. Mycoinsecticides and Mycoacaricides: A
comprehensive list with worldwide coverage and international classification of
formulation types. Biol Control 43, 237-256.
Farrow, R., Daly, J., 1987. Long-range movements as an adaptive strategy in the genus
Heliothis (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae)-a review of its occurrence and detection in 4 pest
species. Aust J Zool 35, 1-24.
Chapter 7 References
118
Ferré, J., Van Rie, J., 2002. Biochemistry and genetics of insect resistance to Bacillus
thuringiensis. Annu Rev Entomol 47, 501-533.
Feyereisen, R., 1999. Insects P450 enzymes. Annu Rev Entomol 44, 507-533.
Feyereisen, R., 2005. Insect Cytochrome P450, in: Lawrence, I.G., Kostas, I., Sarjeet,
S.G. (Eds.), Comprehensive Molecular Insect Science. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 1-77.
Feyereisen, R., 2006. Evolution of insect P450. Biochem Soc Trans 36, 1252-1255.
Feyereisen, R., 2012. Insect CYP genes and P450 enzymes. Insect Mol Biol Biochem,
236-316.
Ffrench-Constant, R., H. , Daborn, P.J., Goff, G.L., 2004. The genetics and genomics
of insecticide resistance. Trends Genet 20, 163-170.
Ffrench-Constant, R.H., 2007. Which came first: insecticides or resistance? Trends
Genet 23, 1-4.
Fisk, J.H., 1989. Karyotype and achiasmatic female meiosis in Helicoverpa armigera
(Hübner) and H. punctigera (Wallengren)(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Genome 32, 967-
971.
Fitt, G.P., 1989. The ecology of Heliothis species in relation to agroecosystems. Annu
Rev Entomol 34, 17-53.
Fitt, G.P., 1994. Cotton pest management: Part 3. An Australian perspective. Annu
Rev Entomol 39, 543-562.
Forrester, N.W., Cahill, M., Bird, L.J., Layland, J.K., 1993. Management of pyrethroid
and endosulfan resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in
Australia. Bulletin of Entomological Research: Supplement Series, 132.
Galtier, N., Nabholz, B., Glémin, S., Hurst, G., 2009. Mitochondrial DNA as a marker
of molecular diversity: a reappraisal. Mol Ecol 18, 4541-4550.
Chapter 7 References
119
Gaudreau, C., Larue, B., Charpentier, G., 2010. Molecular comparison of Quebec and
Newfoundland populations of the blackfly, Simulium vittatum, species complex. Med
Vet Entomol 24, 214-217.
Ghulam, H.M., 2007. Review of the current status of insecticide resistance in insect
pests of cotton and their management. Pak J Bot 39, 2699-2703.
Gill, S.S., Cowles, E.A., Pietrantonio, P.V., 1992. The mode of action of Bacillus
thuringiensis endotoxins. Annu Rev Entomol 37, 615-634.
Gissi, C., Iannelli, F., Pesole, G., 2008. Evolution of the mitochondrial genome of
Metazoa as exemplified by comparison of congeneric species. Heredity 101, 301-320.
Goldstein, H., 1991. Multilevel modelling of survey data. The Statistician, 235-244.
Gould, F., Estock, M., Hillier, N.K., Powell, B., Groot, A.T., Ward, C.M., Emerson,
J.L., Schal, C., Vickers, N.J., 2010. Sexual isolation of male moths explained by a
single pheromone response QTL containing four receptor genes. Proc Natl Acad Sci
107, 8660-8665.
Grubor, V.D., Heckel, D.G., 2007. Evaluation of the role of CYP6B cytochrome
P450s in pyrethroid resistant Australian Helicoverpa armigera. Insect Mol Biol 16,
15-23.
Guengerich, F.P., 2007. Cytochrome P450 and chemical toxicology. Chem Res
Toxicol 21, 70-83.
Gujar, G., Kumari, A., Kalia, V., Chandrashekar, K., 2000. Spatial and temporal
variation in susceptibility of the American bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)
to Bacillus thuringiensis var. kurstaki in India. Curr Sci 78, 995-1001.
Gunning, R., 2006. Inhibition of carbamate-insensitive acetylcholinesterase by
piperonyl butoxide in Helicoverpa armigera. J Mol Neurosci 30, 21-22.
Gunning, R.V., 1996. Bioassay for detecting pyrethroid nerve insensitivity in
Australian Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Econ Entomol 89, 816-
819.
Chapter 7 References
120
Gunning, R.V., Dang, H.T., Kemp, F.C., Nicholson, I.C., Moores, G.D., 2005. New
resistance mechanism in Helicoverpa armigera threatens transgenic crops expressing
Bacillus thuringiensis Cry1Ac Toxin. Appl Environ Microbiol 71, 2558-2563.
Gunning, R.V., Devonshire, A.L., Moores, G.D., 1995. Metabolism of esfenvalerate
by pyrethroid-susceptible and -resistant Australian Helicoverpa armigera
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pestic Biochem Physiol 51, 205-213.
Gunning, R.V., Easton, C.S., Balfe, M.E., Ferris, I.G., 1991. Pyrethroid resistance
mechanisms in Australian Helicoverpa armigera. Pestic Sci 33, 473-490.
Gunning, R.V., Moores, G.D., Devonshire, A.L., 1998. Insensitive
acetylcholinesterase causes resistance to organophosphates in Australian Helicoverpa
armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pestic Sci 54, 319-320.
Gunning, R.V., Moores, G.D., Devonshire, A.L., 1999. Esterase inhibitors synergise
the toxicity of pyrethroids in Australian Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera:
Noctuidae). Pestic Biochem Physiol 63, 50-62.
Gunning, R.V., Moores, G.D., Jewess, P., Boyes, A.L., Devonshire, A.L., Khambay,
B.P.S., 2007. Use of pyrethroid analogues to identify key structural features for
enhanced esterase resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera:
Noctuidae). Pest Manag Sci 63, 569-575.
Gupta, R.C., Milatovic, D., 2012. Organophosphates and carbamates, Veterinary
Toxicology, 2nd ed. Academic Press, Boston, pp. 573-585.
Hardwick, D.F., 1970. A generic revision of the North American heliothidinae
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Mem Entomol Soc Can 102, 5-59.
Hastings, J.M., Schultheis, P.J., Whitson, M., Holliday, C.W., Coelho, J.R., Mendell,
A.M., 2008. DNA barcoding of new world cicada killers (Hymenoptera: Crabronidae).
Zootax, 27-38.
Hawthorne, D.J., 2001. AFLP-based genetic linkage map of the Colorado potato beetle
Leptinotarsa decemlineata: sex chromosomes and a pyrethroid-resistance candidate
gene. Genetics 158, 695-700.
Chapter 7 References
121
Hebert, P.D., Cywinska, A., Ball, S.L., 2003. Biological identifications through DNA
barcodes. Proc R Soc Lond 270, 313-321.
Hebert, P.D., Gregory, T.R., 2005. The promise of DNA barcoding for taxonomy. Syst
Biol 54, 852-859.
Hebert, P.D., Penton, E.H., Burns, J.M., Janzen, D.H., Hallwachs, W., 2004. Ten
species in one: DNA barcoding reveals cryptic species in the neotropical skipper
butterfly Astraptes fulgerator. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 101, 14812-14817.
Heckel, D.G., 2003. Genomics in pure and applied entomology. Annu Rev Entomol
48, 235-260.
Heckel, D.G., 2012. Insecticide resistance after silent spring. Science 337, 1612-1614.
Heckel, D.G., Gahan, L.J., Daly, J.C., Trowell, S., 1998. A genomic approach to
understanding Heliothis and Helicoverpa resistance to chemical and biological
insecticides. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353, 1713-1722.
Heckel, D.G., Gahan, L.J., Gould, F., Daly, J.C., Trowell, S., 1997. Genetics of
Heliothis and Helicoverpa resistance to chemical insecticides and to Bacillus
thuringiensis. Pestic Sci 51, 251-258.
Heckel, D.G., Gahan, L.J., Liu, Y.-B., Tabashnik, B.E., 1999. Genetic mapping of
resistance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in diamondback moth using biphasic linkage
analysis. Proc Natl Acad Sci 96, 8373-8377.
Hemingway, J., Hawkes, N.J., McCarroll, L., Ranson, H., 2004. The molecular basis
of insecticide resistance in mosquitoes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 34, 653-665.
Hill, D.S., 1997a. Beneficial insects, The economic importance of insects. Springer
Netherlands, pp. 7-50.
Hill, D.S., 1997b. Harmful Insects, The economic importance of insects. Springer
Netherlands, pp. 77-332.
Chapter 7 References
122
Hodgson, E., Levi, P.E., Denys Glynne, J., 1999. Interactions of Piperonyl butoxide
with cytochrome P450, Piperonyl butoxide. Academic Press, London, pp. 41-II.
Höfte, H., Whiteley, H.R., 1989. Insecticidal crystal proteins of Bacillus thuringiensis.
Microbiol Rev 53, 242-255.
Hoy, M.A., 2003. Molecular systematics and evolution of Arthropods, Insect
Molecular Genetics, 2nd ed. Academic Press, Burlington, pp. 350-399.
Huang, J., Rozelle, S., Pray, C., Wang, Q., 2002. Plant biotechnology in China.
Science 295, 674-676.
Huber, J., 1986. Use of baculoviruses in pest management programs, The biology of
baculoviruses. CRC press, Boca Raton, pp. 181-202.
Ikawa, T., Okabe, H., Hoshizaki, S., Suzuki, Y., Fuchi, T., Cheng, L., 2002. Species
composition and distribution of ocean skaters Holobates (Hemiptera: Gerridae) in the
western Pacific Ocean. Entomol Sci 5, 1-6.
IRAC, 2013. Resistance definition: In Resistance management for sustainable
agriculture and improved public health, pp. Accessed: 31 March, 2014.
Ishaaya, I., Casida, J.E., 1980. Properties and toxicological significance of esterases
hydrolyzing permethrin and cypermethrin in trichoplusia ni larval gut and integument.
Pestic Biochem Physiol 14, 178-184.
Ivanova, N.V., Dewaard, J.R., Hebert, P.D.N., 2006. An inexpensive, automation-
friendly protocol for recovering high-quality DNA. Mol Ecol Notes 6, 998-1002.
Jain, S.K., Neekhra, B., Pandey, D., Jain, K., 2010. RAPD marker system in insect
study: A review. Indian J. Biotechnol. 9, 7-12.
James, C., 2012. Global status of commercialized biotech/GM crops: 2012. ISAAA
Brief No. 44. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.
Chapter 7 References
123
Jenkins, T.M., Dean, R.E., Forschler, B.T., 2002. DNA technology, interstate
commerce, and the likely origin of Formosan subterranean termite (Isoptera:
Rhinotermitidae) infestation in Atlanta, Georgia. J Econ Entomol 95, 381-389.
Jenkins, T.M., Dean, R.E., Verkerk, R., Forschler, B.T., 2001. Phylogenetic analyses
of two mitochondrial genes and one nuclear intron region illuminate European
subterranean termite (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae) gene flow, taxonomy, and
introduction dynamics. Mol Phylogenet Evol 20, 286-293.
Ji, Y.J., Zhang, D.X., Hewitt, G.M., Kang, L., Li, D.M., 2003. Polymorphic
microsatellite loci for the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera:
Noctuidae) and some remarks on their isolation. Mol Ecol Notes 3, 102-104.
Jonah, P., Bello, L., Lucky, O., Midau, A., Moruppa, S., 2011. Review: The
importance of molecular markers in plant breeding programmes. Glob J Sci Front Res
11.
Joussen, N., Agnolet, S., Lorenz, S., Schoene, S.E., Ellinger, R., Schneider, B.,
Heckel, D.G., 2012. Resistance of Australian Helicoverpa armigera to fenvalerate is
due to the chimeric P450 enzyme CYP337B3. Proc Natl Acad Sci 109, 15206-15211.
Kaiser, T.S., Heckel, D.G., 2012. Genetic Architecture of Local Adaptation in Lunar
and Diurnal Emergence Times of the Marine Midge Clunio marinus (Chironomidae,
Diptera). PloS one 7, e32092.
Kimura, M., 1980. A simple method for estimating evolutionary rates of base
substitutions through comparative studies of nucleotide sequences. J Mol Evol 16,
111-120.
King, A.B.S., 1994. Heliothis/Helicoverpa (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae), Insect pests of
cotton. CAB International, Wallingford, U.K., pp. 39-106.
Kranthi, K.R., Armes, N.J., Rao, N.G.V., Raj, S., Sundaramurthy, V.T., 1997.
Seasonal dynamics of metabolic mechanisms mediating pyrethroid resistance in
Helicoverpa armigera in central India. Pestic Sci 50, 91-98.
Chapter 7 References
124
Kranthi, K.R., Jadhav, D., Wanjari, R., Kranthi, S., Russell, D., 2001. Pyrethroid
resistance and mechanisms of resistance in field strains of Helicoverpa armigera
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J Econ Entomol 94, 253-263.
Lee, K.S., Walker, C.H., McCaffery, A., Ahmad, M., Little, E., 1989. Metabolism of
trans-cypermethrin by Heliothis armigera and H. virescens. Pestic Biochem Physiol
34, 49-57.
Leniaud, L., Dedeine, F., Pichon, A., Dupont, S., Bagnères, A.-G., 2010. Geographical
distribution, genetic diversity and social organization of a new European termite,
Reticulitermes urbis (Isoptera: Rhinotermitidae). Biol Invasions 12, 1389-1402.
Li, H.B., Wu, K.M., Yang, X.R., 2006. Trend of occurrence of cotton bollworm and
control efficacy of Bt cotton in cotton planting region of Southern Xinjiang. Chin Agri
Sci 39, 199-205.
Li, Q., Li, D., Ye, H., Liu, X., Shi, W., Cao, N., Duan, Y., 2011. Using COI gene
sequence to barcode two morphologically alike species: the cotton bollworm and the
oriental tobacco budworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Mol Biol Rep 38, 5107-5113.
Li, X., Schuler, M.A., Berenbaum, M.R., 2007. Molecular mechanisms of metabolic
resistance to synthetic and natural xenobiotics. Annu Rev Entomol 52, 231-253.
Librado, P., Rozas, J., 2009. DnaSP v5: a software for comprehensive analysis of
DNA polymorphism data. Bioinformatics 25, 1451-1452.
Little, E.J., McCaffery, A.R., Walker, C.H., Parker, T., 1989. Evidence for an
enhanced metabolism of cypermethrin by a monooxygenase in a pyrethroid-resistant
strain of the tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens F.). Pestic Biochem Physiol 34,
58-68.
Liu, N., 2012. Pyrethroid resistance in insects: Genes, mechanisms, and regulation., in:
Perveen, F. (Ed.), Insecticides - advances in integrated pest management. CBS
Publishers & Distributors Pvt. Ltd., pp. 257-468.
Lu, Y., Wu, K., Jiang, Y., Guo, Y., Desneux, N., 2012. Widespread adoption of Bt
cotton and insecticide decrease promotes biocontrol services. Nature 487, 362-365.
Chapter 7 References
125
Mao, W., Schuler, M.A., Berenbaum, M.R., 2011. CYP9Q-mediated detoxification of
acaricides in the honey bee (Apis mellifera). Proc Natl Acad Sci 108, 12657-12662.
Marinotti, O., Nguyen, Q.K., Calvo, E., James, A.A., Ribeiro, J.M.C., 2005.
Microarray analysis of genes showing variable expression following a blood meal in
Anopheles gambiae. Insect Mol Biol 14, 365-373.
Martin, T., Ochou, G.O., Djihinto, A., Traore, D., Togola, M., Vassal, J.M., Vaissayre,
M., Fournier, D., 2005. Controlling an insecticide-resistant bollworm in West Africa.
Agric Ecosyst Environ 107, 409-411.
Mastrangelo, T., Paulo, D.F., Bergamo, L.W., Morais, E.G.F., Silva, M., Bezerra-
Silva, G., Azeredo-Espin, A.M.L., 2014. Detection and genetic diversity of a
Heliothine invader (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) from North and Northeast of Brazil. J
Econ Entomol 107, 970-980.
McCaffery, A.R., 1998. Resistance to insecticides in Heliothine Lepidoptera: a global
view. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci 353, 1735-1750.
Melander, A.L., 1914. Can Insects Become Resistant to Sprays? J Econ Entomol 7,
167-173.
Metcalf, R.L., 2000. Insect control, Ullmann's encyclopedia of industrial chemistry.
Wiley-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA.
Ming, Q., Wang, C., 2006. Genetic differentiation of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)
and H. assulta (Guene) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) based on AFLP markers. Insect Sci
13, 437-444.
Mitter, C., Poole, R.W., Matthews, M., 1993. Biosystematics of the Heliothinae
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Annu Rev Entomol 38, 207-225.
Mora, C., Tittensor, D.P., Adl, S., Simpson, A.G.B., Worm, B., 2011. How many
species are there on earth and in the ocean? PLoS Biol 9, e1001127.
Morgan, E.T., 2001. Regulation of cytochrome P450 by inflammatory mediators: why
and how? Drug Metab Dispos 29, 207-212.
Chapter 7 References
126
Moscardi, F., 1999. Assessment of the application of Baculoviruses for control of
lepidoptera. Annu Rev Entomol 44, 257-289.
Mullin, C., A., Scott, J., G., 1992. Biomolecular basis for insecticide resistance,
Molecular mechanisms of insecticide resistance. American Chemical Society, pp. 1-
13.
Nelson, D.R., 2009. The cytochrome p450 homepage. Hum Genomics 4, 59-65.
Nelson, D.R., Koymans, L., Kamataki, T., Stegeman, J.J., Feyereisen, R., Waxman,
D.J., Waterman, M.R., Gotoh, O., Coon, M.J., Estabrook, R.W., Gunsalus, I.C.,
Nebert, D.W., 1996. P450 superfamily: update on new sequences, gene mapping,
accession numbers and nomenclature. Pharmacogenetics 6, 1-42.
Newcomb, R., D, Gleeson, D., M, Yong, C., G, Russell, R., J, Oakeshott, J., G, 2005.
Multiple mutations and gene duplications conferring organophosphorus insecticide
resistance have been selected at the Rop-1 locus of the sheep blowfly, Lucilia cuprina.
J Mol Evol 60, 207-220.
Nibouche, S., Buès, R., Toubon, J.-F., Poitout, S., 1998. Allozyme polymorphism in
the cotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): comparison of
African and European populations. Heredity 80, 438-445.
Orr, H.A., 1998. The population genetics of adaptation: the distribution of factors
fixed during adaptive evolution. Evolution, 935-949.
Pinto, J., Lynd, A., Vicente, J.L., Santolamazza, F., Randle, N.P., Gentile, G., Moreno,
M., Simard, F., Charlwood, J.D., do Rosário, V.E., Caccone, A., della Torre, A.,
Donnelly, M.J., 2007. Multiple origins of knockdown resistance mutations in the
afrotropical mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae. PLoS ONE 2, e1243.
Pittendrigh, B., Aronstein, K., Zinkovsky, E., Andreev, O., Campbell, B., Daly, J.,
Trowell, S., Ffrench-Constant, R.H., 1997. Cytochrome P450 genes from Helicoverpa
armigera: Expression in a pyrethroid-susceptible and -resistant strain. Insect Biochem
Mol Biol 27, 507-512.
Chapter 7 References
127
Pittendrigh, B.R., Margam, V.M., Sun, L., Huesing, J.E., 2007. Resistance in the Post-
Genomics Age. Insect Resistance Management, 39-68.
Pritchard, J.K., Stephens, M., Donnelly, P., 2000. Inference of population structure
using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155, 945-959.
Ramadan, H.A., Baeshen, N.A., 2012. Biological identifications through DNA
barcodes, in: Lameed, b.A. (Ed.), Biodiversity conservation and utilization in a diverse
world. InTech, Janeza Trdine, Rijeka, Croatia.
Ranasinghe, C., Campbell, B., Hobbs, A.A., 1998. Over-expression of cytochrome
P450 CYP6B7 mRNA and pyrethroid resistance in Australian populations of
Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Pestic Sci 54, 195-202.
Ranasinghe, C., Hobbs, A.A., 1998. Isolation and characterization of two cytochrome
P450 cDNA clones for CYP6B6 and CYP6B7 from Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner):
possible involvement of CYP6B7 in pyrethroid resistance. Insect Biochem Mol Biol
28, 571-580.
Ranasinghe, C., Hobbs, A.A., 1999. Induction of cytochrome P450 CYP6B7 and
cytochrome b5 mRNAs from Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) by pyrethroid
insecticides in organ culture. Insect Mol Biol 8, 443-447.
Ratnasingham, S., Hebert, P.D.N., 2007. bold: The barcode of life data system
(http://www.barcodinglife.org). Mol Ecol Notes 7, 355-364.
Raymond, M., Berticat, C., Weill, M., Pasteur, N., Chevillon, C., 2002. Insecticide
resistance in the mosquito Culex pipiens: What have we learned about adaptation?,
Microevolution Rate, Pattern, Process. Springer Netherlands, pp. 287-296.
Reed, W., 1965. Heliothis armigera (Hb.) (Noctuidae) in Western Tanganyika.
Biology, with special reference to the pupal stage. Bull Entomol Res 56, 117-125.
Richardson, B.J., Baverstock, P.R., Adams, M., 1986. Allozyme Electrophoresis, A
Handbook for Animal Systematics and Population Studies. Academic Press.
Chapter 7 References
128
Riddick, D.S., Lee, C., Bhathena, A., Timsit, Y.E., Cheng, P.-Y., Morgan, E.T.,
Prough, R.A., Ripp, S.L., Miller, K.K.M., Jahan, A., Chiang, J.Y.L., 2004.
Transcriptional suppression of cytochrome P450 genes by endogenous and exogenous
chemical. Drug Metab Dispos 32, 367-375.
Rinkevich, F.D., Hedtke, S.M., Leichter, C.A., Harris, S.A., Su, C., Brady, S.G.,
Taskin, V., Qiu, X., Scott, J.G., 2012. Multiple origins of kdr-type resistance in the
house fly, Musca domestica. PLoS ONE 7, e52761.
Roberts, D.M., Dissanayake, W., Rezvi Sheriff, M.H., Eddleston, M., 2004.
Refractory status epilepticus following self-poisoning with the organochlorine
pesticide endosulfan. J Clin Neurosci 11, 760-762.
Roberts, R.J., Vincze, T., Posfai, J., Macelis, D., 2007. REBASE--enzymes and genes
for DNA restriction and modification. Nucleic Acids Res 35, 269-270.
Robinson, R., 1971. Lepidoptera genetics. Cambridge Univ Press.
Rochester, W.A., Dillon, M.L., Fitt, G.P., Zalucki, M.P., 1996. A simulation model of
the long-distance migration of Helicoverpa spp. moths. Ecol Model 86, 151-156.
Rubinoff, D., Cameron, S., Will, K., 2006. A genomic perspective on the
shortcomings of mitochondrial DNA for “barcoding” identification. J Hered 97, 581-
594.
Rung, A., Scheffer, S., Evans, G., Miller, D., 2008. Molecular identification of two
closely related species of mealybugs of the genus Planococcus (Homoptera:
Pseudococcidae). Ann Entomol Soc Am 101, 525-532.
Russell, D., Kranthi, K., 2006. Insecticide resistant in cotton bollworm (H. armigera),
Cotton bollworm control in small-scale cotton production systems, pp. 40-58.
Sabourault, C., Guzov, V.M., Koener, J.F., Claudianos, C., Plapp, F.W., Feyereisen,
R., 2001. Overproduction of a P450 that metabolizes diazinon is linked to a loss-of-
function in the chromosome 2 ali-esterase (MdαE7) gene in resistant house flies. Insect
Mol Biol 10, 609-618.
Chapter 7 References
129
Sahara, K., Yoshido, A., Shibata, F., Fujikawa, N., Okabe, T., Tanaka-Okuyama, M.,
Yasukochi, Y., 2013. FISH identification of Helicoverpa armigera and Mamestra
brassicae chromosomes by BAC and fosmid probes. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 43,
644-653.
Schloetterer, C., 2001. Genealogical inference of closely related species based on
microsatellites. Genet Res 78, 209-212.
Schnepf, E., Crickmore, N., Van Rie, J., Lereclus, D., Baum, J., Feitelson, J., Zeigler,
D.R., Dean, D.H., 1998. Bacillus thuringiensis and Its pesticidal crystal proteins.
Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62, 775-806.
Scott, J.G., 1999. Cytochromes P450 and insecticide resistance. Insect Biochem Mol
Biol 29, 757-777.
Scott, J.G., 2008. Insect cytochrome P450s: Thinking beyond detoxification. In recent
advances in insect physiology, toxicology and molecular biology. Toxicol Mol Biol,
117-124
Scott, K., Wilkinson, K., Lawrence, N., Lange, C., Scott, L., Merritt, M., Lowe, A.,
Graham, G., 2005a. Gene-flow between populations of cotton bollworm Helicoverpa
armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) is highly variable between years. Bull Entomol
Res 95, 381.
Scott, K.D., Lawrence, N., Lange, C.L., Scott, L.J., Wilkinson, K.S., Merritt, M.A.,
Miles, M., Murray, D., Graham, G.C., 2005b. Assessing moth migration and
population structuring in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) at the
regional scale: example from the Darling Downs, Australia. J Econ Entomol 98, 2210-
2219.
Scott, L.J., Lawrence, N., Lange, C.L., Graham, G.C., Hardwick, S., Rossiter, L.,
Dillon, M.L., Scott, K.D., 2006. Population dynamics and gene flow of Helicoverpa
armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) on cotton and grain crops in the Murrumbidgee
Valley, Australia. J Econ Entomol 99, 155-163.
Chapter 7 References
130
Seifert, J., Scott, J.G., 2002. The CYP6D1v1 allele is associated with pyrethroid
resistance in the house fly, Musca domestica. Pestic Biochem Physiol 72, 40-44.
Selkoe, K.A., Toonen, R.J., 2006. Microsatellites for ecologists: a practical guide to
using and evaluating microsatellite markers. Ecol Lett 9, 615-629.
Semagn, K., Bjornstad, A., Ndjiondjop, M., 2006. An overview of molecular marker
methods for plants. Afr J Biotechnol 5.
Severson, D., 1996. RFLP analysis of insect genomes, in: Crampton, J., Beard, C.B.,
Louis, C. (Eds.), The Molecular Biology of Insect Disease Vectors. Springer
Netherlands, pp. 309-320.
Shah, P.A., Pell, J.K., 2003. Entomopathogenic fungi as biological control agents.
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 61, 413-423.
Shanower, T., Romeis, J., Minja, E., 1999. Insect pests of pigeonpea and their
management. Annu Rev Entomol 44, 77-96.
Sharif, M.M., Hejazi, M.J., Mohammadi, A., Rashidi, M.R., 2007. Resistance status of
the Colorado potato beetle, Leptinotarsa decemlineata, to endosulfan in East
Azarbaijan and Ardabil provinces of Iran. J Insect Sci 7, 1-7.
Sharma, H.C., 2005. Heliothis/Helicoverpa management, in: Sharma, H.C. (Ed.),
Emerging trends and strategies for future research. Oxford & IBH Publishing Co. Pvt.
Ltd, New Dehli, India.
Sheck, A., Groot, A., Ward, C., Gemeno, C., Wang, J., Brownie, C., Schal, C., Gould,
F., 2006. Genetics of sex pheromone blend differences between Heliothis virescens
and Heliothis subflexa: a chromosome mapping approach. J Evol Biol 19, 600-617.
Sheehan, D., Meade, G., Foley, V.M., Dowd, C.A., 2001. Structure, function and
evolution of glutathione transferases: implications for classification of non-
mammalian members of an ancient enzyme superfamily. Biochem J 360, 1-16.
Chapter 7 References
131
Shono, T., Ohsawa, K., Casida, J.E., 1979. Metabolism of trans- and cis-permethrin,
trans- and cis-cypermethrin, and decamethrin by microsomal enzymes. J Agri Food
Chem 27, 316-325.
Sparks, T.C., Lockwood, J.A., Byford, R.L., Graves, J.B., Leonard, B.R., 1989. The
role of behavior in insecticide resistance. Pestic Sci 26, 383-399.
Speight, M.R., Hunter, M.D., Watt, A.D., 1999. Ecology of insects: concepts and
applications. Blackwell Science Ltd.
Steichen, J., Rocheleau, T., Aronstein, K., Roush, R., 1993. A single-amino acid
substitution in a gamma-aminobutyric acid subtype A receptor locus is associated with
cyclodiene insecticide resistance in Drosophila populations. Proc Natl Acad Sci 90,
1957-1961.
Stokes, N.H., Mckechnie, S.W., Forrester, N.W., 1997. Multiple allelic variation in a
sodium channel gene from populations of australian Helicoverpa armigera
(Hübner)(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) detected via temperature gradient gel
electrophoresis. Aust J Entomol 36, 191-196.
Strutzenberger, P., Brehm, G., Fiedler, K., 2011. DNA barcoding-based species
delimitation increases species count of Eois (Geometridae) moths in a well-studied
tropical mountain forest by up to 50%. Insect Science 18, 349-362.
Sturtevant, A.H., 1913. The linear arrangement of six sex-linked factors in Drosophila,
as shown by their mode of association. J Exp Zool 14, 43-59.
Suomalainen, E., Cook, L.M., Turner, J.R., 1973. Achiasmatic oogenesis in the
heliconiine butterflies. Hereditas 74, 302-304.
Symondson, W., 2002. Molecular identification of prey in predator diets. Mol Ecol 11,
627-641.
Syvanen, A., 2001. Accessing genetic variation: genotyping single nucleotide
polymorphisms. Nat Rev Genet 2, 930-942.
Chapter 7 References
132
Tamura, K., Peterson, D., Peterson, N., Stecher, G., Nei, M., Kumar, S., 2011.
MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood,
evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28, 2731-
2739.
Tan, J., McCaffery, A.R., 2007. Efficacy of various pyrethroid structures against a
highly metabolically resistant isogenic strain of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera:
Noctuidae) from China. Pest Manag Sci 63, 960-968.
Tay, W., Behere, G., Heckel, D., Lee, S., Batterham, P., 2008. Exon-primed intron-
crossing (EPIC) PCR markers of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae).
Bull Entomol Res 98, 509-518.
Tay, W.T., Behere, G.T., Batterham, P., Heckel, D.G., 2010. Generation of
microsatellite repeat families by RTE retrotransposons in lepidopteran genomes. BMC
Evol Biol 10, 144.
Teacher, A., Griffiths, D., 2011. HapStar: automated haplotype network layout and
visualization. Mol Ecol Resour 11, 151-153.
Thacker, J.R.M., 2002. Modern synthetic insecticides. , In an introduction to arthropod
pest control Cambridge Unversity Press, pp. 50-79.
Tijet, N., Helvig, C., Feyereisen, R., 2001. The cytochrome P450 gene superfamily in
Drosophila melanogaster: Annotation, intron-exon organization and phylogeny. Gene
262, 189-198.
Torres-Vila, L.M., Rodriguez-Molina, M.C., Lacasa-Plasencia, A., Bielza-Lino, P.,
Rodriguez-del-Rincon, A., 2002. Pyrethroid resistance of Helicoverpa armigera in
Spain: current status and agroecological perspective. Agric Ecosyst Environ 93, 55-66.
Udomsinprasert, R., Pongjaroenkit, S., Wongsantichon, J., Oakley, A.J.,
Prapanthadara, L., Wilce, M.C.J., Ketterman, A.J., 2005. Identification,
characterization and structure of a new delta class glutathione transferase isoenzyme.
Biochem. J. 388, 763-771.
Chapter 7 References
133
Unbehend, M., Hänniger, S., Meagher, R., Heckel, D., Groot, A., 2013. Pheromonal
divergence between two strains of Spodoptera frugiperda. J Chem Ecol 39, 364-376.
Urlacher, V.B., Girhard, M., 2012. Cytochrome P450 monooxygenases: an update on
perspectives for synthetic application. Trends Biotechnol 30, 26-36.
Vassal, J., Brevault, T., Achaleke, J., Menozzi, P., 2008. Genetic structure of the
polyphagous pest Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) across the Sub-
Saharan cotton belt. Commun Agric Appl Biol Sci 73, 433.
Venette, R.C., Davis, E.E., Zaspel, J., Heisler, H., Larson, M., 2003. Mini risk
assessment, Old World bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidoptera:
Noctuidae), in: Cooperative Agricultural Pest Survey, A.a.P.H.I.S. (Ed.), US
Department of Agriculture.
Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., van De Lee, T., Hornes, M., Friters, A.,
Pot, J., Paleman, J., Kuiper, M., 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA fingerprinting.
Nucleic Acids Res 23, 4407-4414.
Wan, P., Zhang, Y., Wu, K., Huang, M., 2005. Seasonal expression profiles of
insecticidal protein and control efficacy against Helicoverpa armigera for Bt cotton in
the Yangtze River valley of China. J Econ Entomol 98, 195-201.
Ware, G.W., Whitacre, D.M., 2004. An introduction to insecticides, The Pesticide
Book. Meister Publisher Willoughby, Ohio, USA, pp. 1-23.
Wee, C., Lee, S., Robin, C., Heckel, D., 2008. Identification of candidate genes for
fenvalerate resistance in Helicoverpa armigera using cDNA-AFLP. Insect Mol Biol
17, 351-360.
Weetman, D., Wilding, C.S., Steen, K., Morgan, J.C., Simard, F., Donnelly, M.J.,
2010. Association mapping of insecticide resistance in wild Anopheles gambiae
populations: major variants identified in a low-linkage disequilbrium genome. PLoS
One 5, e13140.
Whalon, M.E., Mota-Sanchez, D., Hollingworth, R.M., 2013. Arthropod resistance
data base.
Chapter 7 References
134
Whinnett, A., Zimmermann, M., Willmott, K.R., Herrera, N., Mallarino, R., Simpson,
F., Joron, M., Lamas, G., Mallet, J., 2005. Strikingly variable divergence times
inferred across an Amazonian butterfly „suture zone‟. Pro R Soc Biol Sci 272, 2525-
2533.
Widmer, M., Schofield, P., 1983. Heliothis dispersal and migration. Tropical
Development and Research Institute, London, United Kingdom.
Williams, J.G., Kubelik, A.R., Livak, K.J., Rafalski, J.A., Tingey, S.V., 1990. DNA
polymorphisms amplified by arbitrary primers are useful as genetic markers. Nucleic
Acids Res 18, 6531-6535.
Willoughby, L., Batterham, P., Daborn, P.J., 2007. Piperonyl butoxide induces the
expression of cytochrome P450 and glutathione S-transferase genes in Drosophila
melanogaster. Pest Manag Sci 63, 803-808.
Wu, K.-M., Lu, Y.-H., Feng, H.-Q., Jiang, Y.-Y., Zhao, J.-Z., 2008. Suppression of
cotton bollworm in multiple crops in China in areas with Bt toxin–containing cotton.
Science 321, 1676-1678.
Wu, K., Guo, Y., Lv, N., Greenplate, J.T., Deaton, R., 2003. Efficacy of transgenic
cotton containing a cry1Ac gene from Bacillus thuringiensis against Helicoverpa
armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Northern China. J Econ Entomol 96, 1322-
1328.
Xiao-Ping, W., Hobbs, A.A., 1995. Isolation and sequence analysis of a cDNA clone
for a pyrethroid inducible cytochrome P450 from Helicoverpa armigera. Insect
Biochem Mol Biol 25, 1001-1009.
Yang, T., Liu, N., 2011. Genome analysis of cytochrome P450s and their expression
profiles in insecticide resistant mosquitoes, Culex quinquefasciatus. PLoS ONE 6,
e29418.
Yang, Y., Chen, S., Wu, S., Yue, L., Wu, Y., 2006. Constitutive overexpression of
multiple cytochrome P450 genes associated with pyrethroid resistance in Helicoverpa
armigera. J Econ Entomol 99, 1784-1789.
Chapter 7 References
135
Yang, Y., Wu, Y., Chen, S., Devine, G.J., Denholm, I., Jewess, P., Moores, G.D.,
2004. The involvement of microsomal oxidases in pyrethroid resistance in
Helicoverpa armigera from Asia. Insect Biochem Mol Biol 34, 763-773.
Yasukochi, Y., Tanaka-Okuyama, M., Shibata, F., Yoshido, A., Marec, F., Wu, C.,
Zhang, H., Goldsmith, M.R., Sahara, K., 2009. Extensive conserved synteny of genes
between the karyotypes of Manduca sexta and Bombyx mori revealed by BAC-FISH
mapping. PLoS One 4, e7465.
Ye, W., Lee, C.-Y., Scheffrahn, R.H., Aleong, J.M., Su, N.-Y., Bennett, G.W., Scharf,
M.E., 2004. Phylogenetic relationships of nearctic Reticulitermes species (Isoptera:
Rhinotermitidae) with particular reference to Reticulitermes arenincola Goellner. Mol
Phylogenet Evol 30, 815-822.
Yoshido, A., Bando, H., Yasukochi, Y., Sahara, K., 2005. The Bombyx mori karyotype
and the assignment of linkage groups. Genetics 170, 675-685.
Young, S.J., Gunning, R.V., Moores, G.D., 2005. The effect of piperonyl butoxide on
pyrethroid resistance associated esterases in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)
(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pest Manag Sci 61, 397-401.
Young, S.J., Gunning, R.V., Moores, G.D., 2006. Effect of pretreatment with
piperonyl butoxide on pyrethroid efficacy against insecticide-resistant Helicoverpa
armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Bemisia tabaci (Sternorrhyncha: Aleyrodidae).
Pest Manag Sci 62, 114-119.
Zalucki, M., Daglish, G., Firempong, S., Twine, P., 1986. The biology and ecology of
Heliothis armigera (Hubner) and Heliothis punctigera Wallengren (Lepidoptera,
Noctuidae) in Australia - What do we know. Aust J Zool 34, 779-814.
Zhang, D.-X., 2004. Lepidopteran microsatellite DNA: redundant but promising.
Trends Ecol Evol 19, 507-509.
Zhang, H., Tang, T., Cheng, Y., Shui, R., Zhang, W., Qiu, L., 2010. Cloning and
expression of cytochrome P450 CYP6B7 in fenvalerate-resistant and susceptible
Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) from China. J Appl Entomol 134, 754-761.
Chapter 7 References
136
Zhang, H., Yin, W., Zhao, J., Jin, L., Yang, Y., Wu, S., Tabashnik, B.E., Wu, Y.,
2011. Early warning of cotton bollworm resistance associated with intensive planting
of Bt cotton in China. PLoS One 6, e22874.
Zhou, X., Faktor, O., Applebaum, S.W., Coll, M., 2000. Population structure of the
pestiferous moth Helicoverpa armigera in the Eastern Mediterranean using RAPD
analysis. Heredity 85, 251-256.
Zhu, F., Li, T., Zhang, L., Liu, N., 2008. Co-up-regulation of three P450 genes in
response to permethrin exposure in permethrin resistant house flies, Musca domestica.
BMC Physiol 8, 18.
Publications
137
Publications
Rasool, A., Jouben, N., Lorenz, S., Ellinger, R., Schneider, B., Khan, S.A., Ashfaq,
M., Heckel, D.G., 2014. An independent occurence of the chimeric P450 enzyme
CYP337B3 of Helicoverpa armigera congers cypermethrin resistance in Pakistan.
Insect Biochem Mol Biol 53, 54-65.
(Attached)
lable at ScienceDirect
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 53 (2014) 54e65
Contents lists avai
Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
journal homepage: www.elsevier .com/locate/ ibmb
An independent occurrence of the chimeric P450 enzyme CYP337B3of Helicoverpa armigera confers cypermethrin resistance in Pakistan
Akhtar Rasool a, 1, 3, Nicole Joußen a, *, 3, Sybille Lorenz b, Renate Ellinger c,Bernd Schneider c, Sher Afzal Khan a, Muhammad Ashfaq d, 2, David G. Heckel a
a Department of Entomology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Kn€oll-Str. 8, 07745 Jena, Germanyb Research Group Mass Spectrometry, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Kn€oll-Str. 8, 07745 Jena, Germanyc Research Group Biosynthesis/Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology, Hans-Kn€oll-Str. 8, 07745 Jena, Germanyd Insect Molecular Biology Lab, National Institute for Biotechnology and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), P.O. Box 577, Jhang Road, Faisalabad, Pakistan
a r t i c l e i n f o
Article history:Received 2 April 2014Received in revised form8 July 2014Accepted 11 July 2014Available online 24 July 2014
Keywords:Pest managementHelicoverpa armigeraCytochrome P450 monooxygenaseCYP337B3Unequal crossing-overPyrethroid resistanceCypermethrin
Abbreviations: AFLP, amplified fragment length plabad; Punjab, Pakistan; P450, cytochrome P450 mquantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction; SAustralia; TWBS, susceptible line of the Helicoverpa a* Corresponding author. Tel.: þ49 (0) 3641 57 1552
E-mail addresses: [email protected] (A. R(R. Ellinger), [email protected] (B. Schneider), sk
1 Present address: Insect Molecular Biology Lab, NPakistan Institute of Engineering and Applied Science
2 Present address: Biodiversity Institute of Ontario,3 These authors contributed equally to this work.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2014.07.0060965-1748/© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
a b s t r a c t
The increasing resistance level of insect pest species is amajor concern to agricultureworldwide. The cottonbollworm,Helicoverpa armigera, is one of themost important pest species due tobeing highly polyphagous,geographically widespread, and resistant towards many chemical classes of insecticides. We previouslydescribed the mechanism of fenvalerate resistance in Australian populations conferred by the chimericcytochrome P450 monooxygenase CYP337B3, which arose by unequal crossing-over between CYP337B1and CYP337B2. Here, we show that thismechanism is also present in the cypermethrin-resistant FSD strainfrom Pakistan. The Pakistani and the Australian CYP337B3 alleles differ by 18 synonymous and threenonsynonymous SNPs and additionally in the length and sequence of the intron. Nevertheless, the activityof both CYP337B3 proteins is comparable. We demonstrate that CYP337B3 is capable of metabolizingcypermethrin (trans- and especially cis-isomers) to the main metabolite 4'-hydroxycypermethrin, whichexhibits no intrinsic toxicity towards susceptible larvae. In a bioassay, CYP337B3 confers a 7-fold resistancetowards cypermethrin in FSD larvae compared to susceptible larvae from the AustralianTWB strain lackingCYP337B3. Linkage analysis shows that presence of CYP337B3 accounts for most of the cypermethrinresistance in the FSD strain; up-regulation of other P450s in FSD plays no detectable role in resistance. Thepresence or absence of CYP337B3 can be easily detectedbya simple PCR screen, providing a powerful tool torapidly distinguish resistant from susceptible individuals in the field and to determine the geographicaldistribution of this resistance gene. Our results suggest that CYP337B3 evolved twice independently byunequal crossing-over between CYP337B2 and two different CYP337B1 alleles.
© 2014 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner), is one ofthemost significant pests of agricultureworldwide. This is due to itsextremely wide geographical distribution, its highly polyphagous
olymorphism; BC, backcross; EPIC,onooxygenase; PBO, piperonyl buR, synergism ratio; TWBR, resistrmigera strain TWB..asool), [email protected], [email protected] (S.A. Khan), mashational Institute for Biotechnologys (PIEAS), Nilore, Islamabad, PakisUniversity of Guelph, ON, Canada
life style, and its ability to quickly evolve resistance against controlagents from different chemical classes. H. armigera can be found inmost countries of Africa, Asia, Oceania, and Europe, and even inregions where no overwintering is possible because of its ability tomigrate long distances (Nibouche et al.,1998). Recently, likely due to
exon-primed intron-crossing primer; FSD, Helicoverpa armigera strain from Faisa-toxide; RF, resistance factor; Rt, retention time; RT-qPCR, reverse transcription-ant line of the Helicoverpa armigera strain TWB from Toowoomba; Queensland,
[email protected] (N. Joußen), [email protected] (S. Lorenz), [email protected]@uoguelph.ca (M. Ashfaq), [email protected] (D.G. Heckel).and Genetic Engineering (NIBGE), P.O. Box 577, Jhang Road, Faisalabad, Pakistan;
tan..
A. Rasool et al. / Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 53 (2014) 54e65 55
human activity, H. armigera invaded the state of Bahia and othernorth-eastern states of Brazil, and thus also occurs now on theAmerican continent (Tay et al., 2013). In Bahia, the infestation willlead to estimated costs of about $1 billion in soybean, cotton, andmaize fields due to increased insecticide applications and yieldlosses (Stewart, 2013). H. armigera is highly polyphagous with morethan 200 host plants, including important crop plants like cotton,tobacco, potato, soybean, and maize (Brun-Barale et al., 2010).Furthermore, its control is hampered by its resistance level that is byfar the highest known from all noctuid species with evolved resis-tance against pyrethroids, organophosphates, carbamates, organo-chlorines (www.pesticideresistance.org), and recently against themacrocyclic lactones spinosad (Aheer et al., 2009; Alvi et al., 2012)and abamectin (Alvi et al., 2012), as well as Bacillus thuringiensis-derived toxins (Alvi et al., 2012; Zhang et al., 2011).
In Pakistan, resistance of H. armigera against the pyrethroidcypermethrin was observed first by Ahmad et al. (1995) in 1991.Since then, cypermethrin resistance has been reported severaltimes from different populations (Aheer et al., 2009; Ahmad, 2004;Ahmad et al., 1997; Alvi et al., 2012; Yang et al., 2004), but theresistance mechanism and the underlying genes remained un-identified until now, even though Yang et al. (2004) proposed aresistancemediated by cytochrome P450monooxygenases (P450s).
Recently,we characterized anovel P450enzyme that is responsiblefor the resistance of Australian H. armigera towards the pyrethroidfenvalerate (Joußen et al., 2012). CYP337B3 is a chimeric gene thatarose by unequal crossing-over between the two parental P450 genes,CYP337B1 and CYP337B2. The chimeric gene is allelic to its parents, i.e.either CYP337B3 occurs alone or CYP337B1 and CYP337B2 occur in atandem array on Chromosome 15. We showed that only CYP337B3 iscapable of metabolizing fenvalerate to the nontoxic 4'-hydrox-yfenvalerate, while CYP337B1 and CYP337B2 exhibit no detectablefenvaleratemetabolism.ThepolymorphicAustralianH.armigera strainTWB was bred into a susceptible line (TWBS) possessing only theparental genes CYP337B1 and CYP337B2 and a resistant line (TWBR)possessing only CYP337B3. In bioassays, we demonstrated that thepresence of CYP337B3 confers a 42-fold resistance towards fenvaler-ate, which is comparable to the resistance factor of 49 reported byForrester et al. (1993) for an Australian field-collected population.
Here, we focus on the cypermethrin-resistant PakistaniH. armigera strain FSD collected from a chickpea field in Faisalabad,Punjab. Bioassays with a synergist indicated involvement of P450s,and the chimeric P450 CYP337B3 was identified as a candidategene. We describe sequence differences between the Pakistani andthe Australian CYP337B3 alleles that are relevant to the question ofwhether this chimeric gene has a single origin or evolved twicethrough independent unequal crossing-over events. Heterologousexpression and functional analysis of CYP337B3 with model sub-strates and the pyrethroids cypermethrin and a-cypermethrinwereconducted, including larval toxicity bioassays of the FSD strain incomparison with the susceptible Australian TWBS line lackingCYP337B3 to determine the resistance level conferred by CYP337B3.Through linkage analysis using AFLPs and expression level analysisof 51 P450 genes, the involvement of other genes in the cyper-methrin resistance was assessed. CYP337B3 is the major cyper-methrin resistancemechanism in the FSD strain, and its presence inthe disjunct regions of Pakistan and Australia hints at a moreextensive worldwide distribution.
2. Materials and methods
2.1. H. armigera strains
For the Pakistani pyrethroid-resistant strain FSD of H. armigera(Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) about 250 larvae were collected
in March 2011 from a chickpea field in Faisalabad, Punjab, Pakistan,where cotton and chickpea are used in rotation and multiplerounds of pyrethroid insecticides are applied for pest control. Thelarvae were reared on pinto bean diet (Joyner and Gould, 1985) at26 �C and 55% humidity with a 16:8 (light:dark) photoperiod. TheAustralian pyrethroid-resistant line TWBR (CYP337B3 line) and thesusceptible line TWBS (CYP337B1-CYP337B2 line) described inJoußen et al. (2012) were maintained on Bio-Serv diet (GeneralPurpose Lepidoptera) under the same conditions. The FSD strainwas maintained through mass rearing (10 pairs in a single cross),while the TWBR and TWBS lines were maintained through single-pair crosses.
2.2. Toxicity bioassays with cypermethrin and its main metabolite
Resistance levels of H. armigera strains were determined byscreening with technical grade cypermethrin (mixture of isomers,purity 95.1%, PESTANAL, SigmaeAldrich). Six different doses ofcypermethrin in a range from 10 ng to 3162.3 ng were prepared inacetone. Thirty to forty healthy third-instar larvae of the FSD strain,the TWBR line, the TWBS line, and of crosses between the FSDstrain and the TWBS line received topical application on the thoraxof 1 mL of the specific dose using a Hamilton syringe fixed in aHamilton PB600-1 Repeating Dispenser (Hamilton Messtechnik).For the FSD strain, the toxicity bioassay was repeated with a pre-treatment of the larvae with piperonyl butoxide (PBO; Endura FineChemicals; 1 mL of 30 mM PBO in acetone), a known P450 andesterase inhibitor (synergist), 2 h prior to the application ofcypermethrin. Larvae were kept on their normal diet under normalrearing conditions. Larval mortality was recorded after 48 h on thebasis of criteria proposed by Joußen et al. (2012). Observed mor-talities were transformed by probit analysis using SPSS Statisticsversion 17.0 to determine regression lines including slope and LD50values.
A toxicity bioassay was also performed with the main metabo-lite of a-cypermethrin using the HPLC-purified metabolite from theupscaled in vitro assay. Fourteen third-instar larvae of the suscep-tible TWBS line were treated with approximately 0.17 mg ofmetabolite (dissolved in 1 ml of acetone; determined by HPLC).
2.3. Screening for the presence or absence of CYP337B1, CYP337B2,and CYP337B3
Genomic DNAwas extracted as described in Joußen et al. (2012)with slight modifications. Genomic DNAwas resuspended in 100 mLof nuclease-free water and stored at �20 �C. DNA from 36 FSDadults were screened by PCR (for primers, see Table S1) for thepresence or absence of CYP337B1, CYP337B2, and CYP337B3.
2.4. Amplified fragment length polymorphism (AFLP) analysis
To generate informative families for genetic mapping, ten malesof the resistant FSD strain were crossed with ten females of thesusceptible TWBS line in a mass mating. F1 males and females werebackcrossed to TWBS in single-pair matings. To determine theresistance dominance in the F1 population, F1 larvae were treatedwith different doses of cypermethrin as described above. Addi-tionally, 100 third-instar larvae of one male-informative backcrossfamily derived from a F1 father and 50 larvae of one female-informative backcross family from a F1 mother were treated withthe discriminating dose of 400 ng of cypermethrin. All treatedlarvae, dead or survived, and 50 untreated third-instar larvae werefrozen at �80 �C for subsequent analysis.
For AFLP analysis, we followed the method published by Voset al. (1995) with a few modifications described by Kaiser and
A. Rasool et al. / Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 53 (2014) 54e6556
Heckel (2012). The extracted DNA (200 ng) of five grandparents(five males and five females) per cross, of the parents, and of 24killed and 24 surviving cypermethrin-treated larvae of the male-informative backcross and of 15 killed and 15 survivingcypermethrin-treated larvae of the female-informative backcrosswere digested with MseI and EcoRI. Primer combinations for se-lective amplification are given in Table S2. Sterile water (10 ml) andLI-COR stop solution (15 ml; 1 mM EDTA, 1 ng mL�1 bromophenolblue, and 85% formamide) were added to the selectively amplifiedPCR products and an aliquot of 0.8 mL was separated along with theDNA marker LI-COR STR (50e700 bp) on an 8% polyacrylamide gelusing the DNA analyzer system LI-COR 4200 sequencer (LI-CORBiosciences-GmbH). The gel was run for 3.5 h and the image wasdeveloped by laser scanning (detection of infrared labelled DNAfragments of 700 nm and 800 nm). Gel scoring was executed withsemiautomatic image analysis software Quantar 1.08 (KeyGeneProducts). In backcross individuals, AFLP markers (fragment bands)of interest were those that were also present in the FSD grand-parent and in the F1 parent (male or female), but not in the TWBSgrandparent or TWBS backcross parent. The presence of a band wasconsidered as the heterozygous genotype while the absence of aband was considered as the homozygous recessive genotype,because the bands were segregating 1:1.
2.5. Mapping of the resistance gene to a linkage group
CYP337B3 (Joußen et al., 2012) was considered as a candidategene involved in cypermethrin resistance of the FSD strain and wasmapped to the linkage groups identified by AFLP analysis. CYP337B3amplicons of 844 bp were generated by PCR using gene specificprimers (Table S1). For fine scale mapping of the resistance gene,four marker genes were chosen (thiol peroxidase m14_FLX and ri-bosomal protein genes RPL10A, RPL8, and RPS23) which wereassumed on the basis of homology to Bombyx mori (Yoshido et al.,2005) to be located on the same linkage group as CYP337B3.Exon-primed intron-crossing primers (EPIC; designed from adja-cent exon sequences which flank the intron, Table S1) weredesigned using the in-house cDNA library (Department of Ento-mology, Max Planck Institute for Chemical Ecology) of the Austra-lian H. armigera strain TWB. The intron positions were predictedfrom those in B. mori, as intron positions are highly conserved inLepidoptera.
The AFLP markers, CYP337B3, and the marker genes wereanalyzed using MAPMAKER 3.0b to determine the number oflinkage groups by exploiting the lack of crossing-over duringoogenesis in lepidopteran females (Heckel et al., 1999; Robinson,1971; Suomalainen et al., 1973). A sequential approach was used:First, absolute linkage in female-informative backcross progenywas used to identify the linkage group involved in resistance.MAPMAKER produced 31 linkage groups from the 252 AFLPmarkers using a LOD score of 3.5. The segregation of 13 resistance-linked AFLPs was verified by correlation with the mortality data(killed and surviving larvae) from the toxicity bioassay withcypermethrin. Second, recombinants among male-informativebackcross progeny were used to identify the position of CYP337B3on the resistance-associated linkage group. Mapping was con-ducted by determining the maximum likelihood order of CYP337B3and the four marker genes (by the ripple command usingMAPMAKER) and, secondly, by including the 13 resistance-linkedAFLP markers (four at a time) building up to the final map.
2.6. RT-qPCR of multiple P450 genes
Reverse transcription-quantitative real-time PCR (RT-qPCR) wasconducted with individuals of the resistant strain FSD in
comparison with the resistant line TWBR and the susceptible lineTWBS. Gene-specific primers for 64 P450 genes (genes included inFigure S1 and additional for an unnamed CYP301A gene) coveringfour major P450 gene families, CYP3, CYP4, CYP6, and CYP9, weredesigned using Primer3 (http://bioinfo.ut.ee/primer3-0.4.0/;Table S3). eIF4A (eukaryotic Initiation Factor 4A) and RPS18 (ribo-somal protein S18) were used as reference genes (Table S3). Allprimers were designed using sequences from the in-house data-base of the Australian H. armigera strain TWB. For RT-qPCR, totalRNA was extracted from fifth-instar larvae (three larvae pooled inone biological replicate and three biological replicates per strain)using TRIzol reagent (Molecular Research Center) following man-ufacturer's instructions. Extracted RNA was treated with DNaseI(Life Technologies) in order to eliminate traces of genomic DNA andpurified through RNeasy MinElute Cleanup Kit (Qiagen). Quality ofpurified RNA was checked by Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit (AgilentTechnologies). First strand cDNA was synthesized using RevertAidH Minus First Strand cDNA Synthesis Kit (Life Technologies) from500 ng of total RNA in 20 mL of reaction mixture with 1 � reactionbuffer, 200 U RevertAid H Minus M-MuLV reverse transcriptase, 20U RiboLock RNase inhibitor, 10 mM dNTPs, and 50 mM oligo (dT) 18primer at 42 �C for 30 min, 50 �C for 60 min, and 95 �C for 2 min.PCR was performed in optical 96-well plates on an Agilent Tech-nologies Stratagene Mx3000P Real-Time PCR System using theABsolute QPCR SYBR Green Mix (Thermo Fisher Scientific) tomonitor the double-stranded DNA synthesis in combination withROX as a passive reference dye included in the PCR master mix.Amplification conditions were the following: 95 �C for 10 min toactivate the polymerase, followed by 40 cycles at 95 �C for 30 s,60 �C for 30 s, and 72 �C for 30 s. A melting and dissociation curveanalysis (MxPro 4.0 QPCR Software, Agilent Technologies) wasperformed in order to verify that the amplicon possessed the cor-rect melting temperature and therefore exhibited the predictedlength and that there was only one PCR product amplified per re-action. Each experiment was repeated with three independent RNAsamples (biological replicates), and each reaction was repeatedthree times (technical replicates) to minimize intra-experimentvariations. The average copy number ±SEM of each P450 mRNArelative to 1000 copies of mRNA of the reference gene eIF4A wascalculated using qBase. Copy numbers in resistant strains FSD orTWBR were compared with copy numbers in the susceptible TWBSline using two-tailed heteroscedastic t tests in Excel. Initially twohousekeeping genes, RPS18 and eIF4A, were used as referencegenes, but because only the expression of eIF4A remained constantfor all the three lines tested over different rounds of experiments,RPS18 was excluded from the analysis.
Expression levels of the three P450 genes which had shown thehighest overexpression in FSD relative to TWBS were comparedamong backcross progeny that were heterozygous resistant (withone copy of CYP337B3) vs. homozygous susceptible. Offspring thathad never been exposed to insecticide were frozen, and subse-quently both DNA and RNAwere isolated from each individual. DNAwas analyzed by PCR for each offspring to determine its CYP337Bgenotype, and RNAwas pooled for each of the two genotype classesfor RT-qPCR.
2.7. Full-length cloning of the chimeric gene CYP337B3 andcharacterization of the intron
To obtain the full-length CDS of CYP337B3 from the FSD strain ofH. armigera 3' and 5' RACE-PCR was performed using cDNA from anindividual larva, the SMARTer™ RACE cDNA Amplification Kit(Clontech) and the First Choice RLM-RACE Kit (Life Technologies)according to the manufacturer's instructions. The cloning strategywas adopted from Joußen et al. (2012). Gene-specific primers for
A. Rasool et al. / Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 53 (2014) 54e65 57
CYP337B3 were designed from the sequence derived from 3' and 5'RACEePCR with the forward primer including a 5'-Kozak sequenceand the reverse primer lacking the stop codon (Table S1) for V5epitope and His-tag fusion expression after ligation into the vectorpIB/V5-His TOPO® TA (Life Technologies). The gene was amplifiedusing AccuPrime™ Taq DNA Polymerase High Fidelity (Life Tech-nologies). Correct orientation and sequence of the insert wasverified by colony PCR after transformation of TOP10 Escherichiacoli cells (Life Technologies) and by sequencing, respectively.
The intron region of CYP337B3was amplified from genomic DNAusing intron spanning primers (Table S1) and was sequenced aftergel purification.
2.8. Heterologous expression of CYP337B3 in Ha2302 cells andisolation of microsomal and cytosolic fractions
Transfection of the adherent insect cell line Ha2302 was per-formed as described by Joußen et al. (2012) using the Insect Gen-eJuice Transfection Reagent (Novagen). Three ml of diluted (with 3-fold of medium) confluent Ha2302 cells were added to onewell of a6-well cell culture plate andwere transfectedwith 1.8 mg of plasmidDNA. Stably transfected cells were selected 48 h post selectionwith60 mgmL�1 of blasticidin. High selection pressurewas reduced aftera few passages to 10 mg mL�1 of blasticidin. The stable transfectedcell culture was cryopreserved and used for microsomal isolation.
Microsomes were isolated from CYP337B3-transgenic and non-transgenic Ha2302 cells using the method described by Joußenet al. (2012). Both cytosolic and microsomal fractions were storedat�80 �C. Protein content was determined by the Bradford method(Bradford, 1976) using the Quick Start Bradford Protein Assay (Bio-Rad). Additionally, the pellets containing the nuclei were snapfrozen for isolation of genomic DNA.
2.9. Confirmation of successful transfection of Ha2302 cells
Genomic DNA of CYP337B3-transgenic Ha2302 cells wasextracted from the nucleus fraction using the method proposed byAljanabi and Martinez (1997) with modifications described byJoußen et al. (2012). Genomic DNA was resuspended in H2O. Thepresence of CYP337B3 was confirmed through PCR using gene-specific primers designed for full-length cloning (for primers, seeTable S1).
Microsomal and cytosolic proteins (10 mg each) of CYP337B3-transgenic Ha2302 cells were analyzed by SDS-PAGE and westernblot as described by Joußen et al. (2012). The tagged P450 proteinwas detected with an Anti-V5-HRP antibody (1:10,000; LifeTechnologies).
2.10. Activity assays with P450 model substrates
Three groups of model substrates, 7-alkoxyresorufins (7-methoxy-, 7-ethoxy-, 7-pentoxy-, and 7-benzyloxyresorufin), 7-alkoxycoumarins (7-methoxy- and 7-ethoxycoumarin), and 3-cyano-7-alkoxycoumarins (3-cyano-7-methoxy- and 3-cyano-7-ethoxycoumarin), were used to determine the functionality ofheterologous CYP337B3. Activity assays were performed andmeasured as described by Joußen et al. (2012). For each activityassay 0.2 mg of microsomal proteins derived from transgenic andnon-transgenic Ha2302 cells were incubated with 1 nmol of sub-strate (dissolved in 1 mL of DMSO) and an NADPH regenerationsystem at 30 �C for 4 h. Samples omitting microsomes were used asbackground controls and two (to three) replicates were used perassay. For 7-alkoxycoumarins, the extraction procedure was carriedout by following Waxman and Chang (2006) with few modifica-tions described in Joußen et al. (2012).
Calibration curves of the products resorufin (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8,9, 10, 50, 100, 150, 200, and 250 pmol; dissolved in DMSO) and 3-cyano-7-hydroxycoumarin (0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, and 10 pmol;dissolved in DMSO), respectively, were measured in the relevantsolvents using two replicates for each amount. Differing from theprocedure by Joußen et al. (2012), for the calibration curve of theproduct 7-hydroxycoumarin, two replicates for each amount (0, 2,4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 16, 18, 20, and 30 pmol; dissolved in DMSO) wereincubated in the reaction mixture with non-transgenic microsomesand were extracted as described for the samples. The resultingcalibration curve includes losses due to handling of aliquots andextraction. The analysis was performed as described by Joußenet al. (2012) with one modification in the expression of the endresult. Calibration curves were transformed by subtracting thefluorescence intensity values received by 0 pmol of product(negative values were set to 0) from all values. For the calculation ofthe metabolic activity of CYP337B3, all negative values were set to0 and the mean of the background control was subtracted from thevalues of all samples to produce the net-fluorescence intensities.Furthermore, the mean of the samples performed with non-transgenic Ha2302 microsomes was subtracted from the meanvalues of all samples. At the end, resulting corrected net-fluorescence intensities were transformed in amounts of productformed by CYP337B3 using the corresponding calibration curve andcorrected metabolic capacities were expressed as pmol productformed by 0.2 mg of microsomal protein in 4 h.
2.11. In vitro metabolism assays with cypermethrin and a-cypermethrin and analysis through HPLC
To determine the capability of CYP337B3 to metabolize cyper-methrin and a-cypermethrin in vitro assays were performed usingthe method described by Joußen et al. (2012). Microsomal proteins(0.8 mg) derived from CYP337B3-transgenic and non-transgenicHa2302 cells were incubated individually in amber borosilicateglass vials with 4 nmol of cypermethrin (mixture of isomers, purity95.1%; PESTANAL, SigmaeAldrich; dissolved in 4 mL of DMSO) anda-cypermethrin (purity 99.7%; PESTANAL, SigmaeAldrich; dis-solved in 4 mL of DMSO), respectively, at 30 �C for 4 h. Additionally,two inhibition assays were performed: Firstly, piperonyl butoxide(purity: at least 90%, Fluka), a known P450 inhibitor, was used in aninhibition assay with 40 nmol per assay. Secondly, an inhibitionstudy with the absence of NADPH was performed by omitting theNADPH regeneration system. Samples were extracted and residueswere redissolved in 25 mL of methanol and 375 mL of H2O:aceto-nitrile 50:50 (organic solvents of HPLC grade) and filtered for HPLC.As a reference in HPLC analysis, a solution of 1 nmol cypermethrinand a-cypermethrin, respectively, per 100 ml was used. HPLCanalysis (100 ml per sample) was executed on a HewlettePackard(Agilent) HPLC 1100 Series equipped with a C18 column (EC 250/4.6Nucleodur® Sphinx RP, 250 � 4.6 mm, 5-mm particle size;MachereyeNagel) as described in Joußen et al. (2012) using thesame program. Cypermethrin, a-cypermethrin, and their metabo-lites were detected at 210 nm, 230 nm, and 275 nm.
2.12. Isolation and identification of the main metabolite of a-cypermethrin
Themain metabolite of a-cypermethrinwas isolated in multipleruns by preparative HPLC from upscaled in vitro assays followingthe method described by Joußen et al. (2012). Microsomal proteins(10.0 mg) from CYP337B3-overexpressing Ha2302 cells were incu-bated with 50 nmol of a-cypermethrin (20.8 mg, purity 99.7%;PESTANAL, SigmaeAldrich; dissolved in 50 mL of DMSO; threereplicates) in a total volume of 10 mL at 30 �C and 110 rpm (orbital
Fig. 1. Doseeresponse curves of the resistant FSD strain of Pakistani H. armigeracompared to the resistant TWBR line and the susceptible TWBS line from Australiatowards cypermethrin. For each of the six doses and a control per line, 30e40 third-instar larvae were tested by topical application. Mortalities (without control) andregression lines from probit transformed mortalities were plotted on a probit scaleagainst logarithmic doses of cypermethrin. Mortalities of 0% were changed to 0.01%and of 100% were changed to 99.99% for plotting.
A. Rasool et al. / Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 53 (2014) 54e6558
shaker CERTOMAT IS, Sartorius) for 24 h. Samples were preparedfor HPLC as described above with the following exceptions: forextraction 5 mL of ethyl acetate (HPLC grade; stirring for 10 min)were used per extraction step and residues of the combined rep-licates were redissolved in 50 mL of methanol and 1150 mL ofacetonitrile (both HPLC grade) and filtered. The main metabolitewas isolated through two HPLC systems and identified by gaschromatography with electron impact mass spectrometry (GC/EI-MS) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy.
GCeMS was performed on a HewlettePackard gas chromato-graph 6890 (Agilent) combined with MS02 mass spectrometerfrom Micromass (Waters) operated in EI mode (70 eV). A ZB5mscolumn (30 m � 0.25 mm, 0.25-mm film thickness; Phenomenex)was used with helium as carrier gas and a flow rate of 1 ml min�1.One ml of sample was injected (splitless) using an injector tem-perature of 250 �C. The samples were run with a temperaturegradient program (40 �C for 2 min, increase of 15 �C min�1 up to300 �C, held on 300 �C for 3 min) and were scanned in a range ofm/z 50e500. HPLC-purified a-cypermethrin main metabolite (2 mg, ina-cypermethrin equivalents) was dissolved in dichloromethane(HPLC grade). a-Cypermethrin (purity 99.7%; PESTANAL, Sigma-eAldrich) was used as reference compound.
1H NMR and 1He1H COSY spectra were recorded at 300 K on aBruker Avance 500 NMR spectrometer equipped with a TCIcryoprobe (5 mm) and operating at a proton NMR frequency of500.13 MHz. HPLC-purified a-cypermethrin main metabolite(5 mg, in a-cypermethrin equivalents) was dissolved in meth-anol-d4 (85 mL) and transferred into a 2 mm capillary for mea-surement. a-Cypermethrin (purity 99.7%; PESTANAL,SigmaeAldrich) was used as reference compound. Six hundredforty transients were collected at 32,000 data points with aspectral width of 10 ppm by using 90� pulse, 3.27 s acquisitiontime, and a relaxation delay of 2 s for 1H NMR. The water signalwas suppressed by PURGE sequence (Simpson and Brown, 2005).The cumulative FID was Fourier transformed to 64,000 datapoints by using line broadening of 0.1 Hz. The resulting spectrumwas manually phased, baseline corrected, and calibrated to thecentral solvent signal (d 3.30) in TOPSPIN version 2.1. The 1He1HCOSY spectrum was acquired with a presaturation pulsesequence for suppressing the residual water signal. A relaxationdelay of 2.0 s was applied and the spectral width was 15 ppm inboth dimensions.
3. Results
3.1. Cypermethrin resistance in the FSD strain is metabolic andsemidominant
To elucidate the cypermethrin resistance mechanism ofH. armigera observed in field populations in Pakistan, third-instarlarvae from the Pakistani FSD strain were treated with differentdoses of cypermethrin for comparison with the fenvalerate-resistant TWBR line and the susceptible TWBS line from Australia(Fig.1). Larvae of the FSD strain and TWBR linewere 6.94- and 5.73-fold, respectively, more resistant than the TWBS line (Table 1). Todetermine the resistance mechanism of the Pakistani strain, FSDlarvae were treated with piperonyl butoxide, a known P450 andcarboxylesterase inhibitor, prior to cypermethrin treatment.Piperonyl butoxide treated larvae were more sensitive to cyper-methrin, revealing a synergism ratio of 7.21 which reduced theresistance factor (RF) to 0.96, similar to susceptible TWBS larvae(Table 1). These results suggest, compared to the susceptible TWBSline, that the cypermethrin resistance observed in PakistaniH. armigera is a metabolic resistance most likely due to one or moreP450 enzymes.
In order to determine the degree of resistance dominance,heterozygous F1 larvae derived from crosses between the resistantFSD strain and the susceptible TWBS line were tested with differentdoses of cypermethrin. The resulting RF of 6.67 (Table 1) is slightlylower than the RF found for the homozygous FSD strain but notsignificantly different indicating a semidominant or dominantresistance, but in favour of a semidominant resistance as this wasdetermined in the heterozygous resistant TWB line bioassayedwithfenvalerate (Joußen et al., 2012). Based on a comparison of thedoseeresponse curve of the F1 larvae with that of the resistant andsusceptible parent strains, a discriminating dose of 400 ng wasselected for the screening of the backcross larvae. Backcross familyF114 from the male-informative backcross (F1 male � TWBS fe-male) and backcross family F223 from the female-informativebackcross (F1 female � TWBS male) showed 50% mortality at thediscriminating dose and thus were selected for further AFLPanalysis.
3.2. Cypermethrin resistance in the FSD strain is monogenic,autosomal and linked to CYP337B3
To determine the number and location of genes involved incypermethrin resistance of the FSD strain, a genetic linkage analysisusing amplified fragment length polymorphisms (AFLPs) asmarkers was performed on backcross progenies bioassayed at thediscriminating dose of cypermethrin. Overall, 236 AFLPs (fragmentsof interests) were scored from the male-informative backcross and252 AFLPs from the female-informative backcross (Table S2). Takingadvantage of the lack of crossing-over in lepidopteran females,MAPMAKER produced 31 linkage groups from the 252 AFLPs of thefemale-informative backcross using a LOD score of 3.5, as expectedfrom the known number of chromosomes in H. armigera (Robinson,
Table 1Characteristics of the Pakistani FSD strain and the Australian TWB lines of H. armigera.
Line Treatment LD50, ng per larva 95% confidence intervals Slope RFa SRb
TWBS Cypermethrin 76.7 57.2, 101.9 1.83 e e
FSD Cypermethrin 531.7 408.1, 770.0 2.32 6.94 e
FSD Cypermethrin þ PBO 73.8 58.4, 91.6 2.61 0.96 7.21TWBR Cypermethrin 439.3 325.8, 600.5 1.67 5.73 e
F1 (FSD � TWBS) Cypermethrin 511.0 289.9, 1535.7 1.08 6.67 e
a RF, resistance factor calculated as LD50 of the resistant strain/line divided by LD50 of the susceptible line.b SR, synergism ratio calculated as LD50 of the treatment with cypermethrin divided by the LD50 of the treatment with cypermethrin and piperonyl butoxide (PBO).
A. Rasool et al. / Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 53 (2014) 54e65 59
1971; Sahara et al., 2013; Tang et al., 2005). A single linkage groupconsisting of 13 AFLPs showed a strong correlation with resistance,with AFLP bands present only in bioassay survivors and absent fromkilled individuals (Figure S2A).
CYP337B3 was considered as a possible candidate gene forresistance (Joußen et al., 2012), and PCR screening showed thatonly CYP337B3 and not CYP337B1 or CYP337B2 occurred in the FSDstrain at the time of the crosses. Further PCR analysis showed thatthe presence of CYP337B3 exhibited the same pattern as theresistance-correlated AFLP linkage group in the female-informativebackcross: present in all bioassay survivors and absent from killedindividuals (Figure S2B).
To localize CYP337B3within this linkage group the occurrence ofcrossing-over during meiosis in lepidopteran males was exploitedby analyzing the male-informative backcross. As CYP337B3 hadpreviously been mapped to the homologue of B. mori Chromosome15, additional markers known to occur on that chromosome wereincluded in the analysis. CYP337B3 mapped near one end of thelinkage group, with the markers showing the same order as inB. mori. Survivorship of the cypermethrin bioassay was moststrongly correlated with the CYP337B3 genotype (Fig. 2).
3.3. Multiple P450 genes are overexpressed in the FSD strain but notgenetically linked to cypermethrin resistance
To examine the possible role of other P450 genes in the cyper-methrin resistance of the FSD strain, an in-house cDNA database ofH. armigera was searched. This revealed contigs of 59 P450 genes,mainly belonging to the P450 gene families CYP6 (17), CYP4 (12),CYP9 (9), and CYP340 (5) (Figure S1). These P450s can be clusteredby phylogenetic analysis into two clans, the CYP3 clan (Figure S1,bottom part) and the CYP4 clan (Figure S1, top part). The expressionlevels of these P450 genes were investigated through RT-qPCR inthe cypermethrin resistant FSD strain and the TWBR line using theTWBS line as a susceptible control. Primers for 58 genes werevalidated for TWBS and TWBR, but only 51 primer pairs worked inFSD, likely due to sequence divergence in one or both primerbinding sites. It was not possible to design specific RT-qPCR primersthat could discriminate between CYP337B1, CYP337B2, andCYP337B3, because of the high sequence similarity of these genes.Statistical analysis of the RT-qPCR data revealed that 12 P450 geneswere significantly up-regulated and 19 were significantly down-regulated in the FSD strain compared to TWBS (Table S4). Threegenes showed more than five-fold higher expression in FSD:CYP340G1 (147-fold), CYP340H1 (15-fold), and CYP341B2 (7-fold).Expression levels in TWBR were much more similar to TWBS, withonly one significant difference, a 73-fold down-regulation ofCYP321B1 (Table S4).
To examine whether P450 upregulation in FSD was geneticallylinked to the cypermethrin resistance in FSD, DNA and RNA wereextracted from 40 larvae of the same female-informative backcrossused in the linkage mapping. These larvae had never been exposedto cypermethrin, so any expression differences are constitutive, not
induced. DNA was used to examine the presence or absence ofCYP337B3, and thus to identify individuals who had received theFSD-derived resistance-associated linkage group from their F1mother. RNA was used to study the expression level of the threeP450s found to be most highly up-regulated in FSD. A higherexpression level of a given P450 among the untreated backcrosslarvae that had received the FSD linkage group would indicategenetic linkage of resistance to that P450 and a cis-acting factorcausing its higher expression, or to a trans-acting factor on thatlinkage group causing higher expression of that P450 located onanother chromosome (Grubor and Heckel, 2007). The three P450genes showing the highest overexpression in FSD (CYP340G1,CYP340H1, and CYP341B2) were not overexpressed in backcrossprogeny receiving the FSD-derived linkage group from the F1mother, relative to backcross progeny receiving the TWBS-derivedlinkage group (Figure S3). Instead, the expression levels were equalin these two groups, and similar to the susceptible TWBS line.Therefore the overexpression of these P450 genes in the FSD strainis not linked to cypermethrin resistance in the FSD strain.
3.4. A new allele of CYP337B3 occurs in the FSD strain
Gene-specific PCR primers for the amplification of CYP337B1and CYP337B2 (845-bp and 847-bp fragments, respectively) andCYP337B3 (844-bp fragment) were used to screen for the presenceof these genes in the FSD strain of H. armigera. The PCR screeningshowed that only CYP337B3was present in all 36 FSD adults tested,while CYP337B1 and CYP337B2were not detected in any adults. Thisindicates that the FSD strain is homozygous for the resistance geneCYP337B3.
The primers reported for the full-length amplification ofCYP337B3(v1) (GenBank: JQ284029) from the Australian TWBstrain (Joußen et al., 2012) did not amplify this gene from the FSDstrain. However, by RACE-PCR using primers designed from the844-bp fragment of CYP337B3, the 3' and 5' ends were successfullyamplified providing the full-length CDS of CYP337B3. The codingsequence is 1479 bp in length, like CYP337B3v1 of the TWB strain.However, the sequences differ by 18 synonymous and 3 non-synonymous SNPs, and the resulting 3 amino acid substitutionsdetermine the FSD sequence as a newallele, which has been namedby the P450 Nomenclature Committee as CYP337B3v2 (DavidNelson, pers. comm.). The resulting differences in the deducedamino acid sequence located at the C-terminus (I365V, L416S,C484R; TWB/FSD) correspond to amino acid differences previouslyfound between the CYP337B1 alleles (denoted as v1 to v4) (Joußenet al., 2012). A comparison of the nucleotide sequences of the twoCYP337B3 alleles with the sequences of the CYP337B1 and CYP337B2alleles revealed that the Australian CYP337B3v1 is more similar toCYP337B1v1 (GenBank: JQ284023) or CYP337B1v3 (GenBank:JQ284024) in its 3’ end, while the Pakistani CYP337B3v2 is moresimilar to CYP337B1v4 (GenBank: JQ284025) (Fig. 3). Furthermore,it seems that the sequence of the Pakistani CYP337B3v2 resemblesthe sequence of CYP337B2 over a longer region than the Australian
Fig. 2. Map of resistanceeassociated linkage group of Helicoverpa armigera. The resistance gene CYP337B3 was mapped using maximum likelihood as implemented in MAPMAKERto determine the order and spacing of the 13 AFLPs, CYP337B3, and four marker genes. The number of progeny carrying the FSD-derived allele (RS genotype) vs. the susceptible allele(SS) at each locus among survivors of the bioassay and killed individuals is indicated at the right. All progeny carrying the CYP337B3 allele from FSD survived and all those lackingCYP337B3 died. For the other loci, the correlation between the FSD-derived allele and survivorship decreases with increasing distance from CYP337B3 along the chromosome.
Fig. 3. Alignment of CYP337B3v1 from Australian and CYP337B3v2 from Pakistani Helicoverpa armigera with the CYP337B1 alleles and CYP337B2. For clarity, only the 21 nucleotidesthat differ between both CYP337B3 alleles are shown. There are more SNPs between the alleles of CYP337B1 and CYP337B2, respectively. Both CYP337B3 alleles are compared toCYP337B2 (blue) at their 50 ends and to the CYP337B1 alleles CYP337B1v1/v3 (green) and CYP337B1v4 (red) at their 30 ends. All nucleotides of the CYP337B3 alleles, which match thenucleotides of one of the genes or alleles they are compared to, are highlighted in the respective colour. Nonsynonymous SNPs are framed. The putative region of the unequalcrossing-over event is highlighted in grey. (For interpretation of the references to colour in this figure legend, the reader is referred to the web version of this article.)
A. Rasool et al. / Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 53 (2014) 54e6560
Table 2Metabolic capacities of CYP337B3v2, CYP337B3v1, and CYP337B1 allozymes towards7-alkoxyresorufins and -coumarins.
P450 MR ER PR BR
CYP337B3v2 255.7 6.6 n.d. 5.6CYP337B3v1 224.3/201.1 6.6/4.2 n.d./n.d. 9.2/8.1CYP337B1v1 128.9/41.9 0.3/n.d. n.d./n.d. 31.9/17.1CYP337B1v3 2.8/n.d. n.d./n.d n.d./n.d. 3.2/0.7CYP337B1v4 145.8/39.8 1.2/0.6 n.d./n.d. 22.9/8.1
P450 MC EC CMC CEC
CYP337B3v2 8.3 1.9 8.4 n.d.CYP337B3v1 15.3/15.3 0.9/n.d. 9.4/8.2 n.d./n.d.CYP337B1v1 6.1/1.3 n.d./n.d. 0.9/0.2 n.d./n.d.CYP337B1v3 0.9/1.3 1.3/2.8 n.d./n.d. n.d./n.d.CYP337B1v4 2.1/n.d. n.d./n.d. 0.7/n.d. n.d./n.d.
Metabolic capacities are expressed as pmol product formed by 0.2mg of microsomalprotein in 4 h. For CYP337B3v1 and the CYP337B1 allozymes, the amounts for theenzymes lacking the V5 epitope and the His-tag are given first, followed by theamounts for the enzymes possessing the tags (Joußen et al., 2012). For CYP337B3v2,only the enzyme possessing the tags was used.MR, 7-methoxyresorufin; ER, 7-ethoxyresorufin; PR, 7-pentoxyresorufin; BR, 7-benzyloxyresorufin; MC, 7-methoxycoumarin; EC, 7-ethoxycoumarin; CMC, 3-cyano-7-methoxycoumarin; CEC, 3-cyano-7-ethoxycoumarin; n.d., not detectable.
A. Rasool et al. / Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 53 (2014) 54e65 61
CYP337B3v1 does (Fig. 3) suggesting a possible shift of the unequalcrossing-over event a few nucleotides up-stream of the proposedposition of the crossover event of the Australian CYP337B3v1(Joußen et al., 2012). Additionally, the intron differs in length andsequence between the Pakistani CYP337B3v2 (1017 bp; GenBank:KJ636466) and the Australian CYP337B3v1 (921 bp; GenBank:JQ995292).
3.5. CYP337B3v2 from the FSD strain is capable of metabolizingcypermethrin and a-cypermethrin
The full length sequence of CYP337B3v2 was ligated into the pIB/V5-His TOPO TA expression vector and was used to transfect cells ofthe insect cell lineHa2302. ThepresenceofCYP337B3v2 in thegenomeof the transfected cells was confirmed by PCR and its successfulexpression by Western blot. Sufficient amounts of CYP337B3v2 weredetected byWestern blot in themicrosomal fraction and only traces inthe cytosolic fraction confirming the association of CYP337B3v2 withthe membrane of the endoplasmic reticulum.
Subsequently, the heterologous CYP337B3v2 was tested for itsfunctionality using known P450 model substrates. CYP337B3v2showed high activity against 7-methoxyresorufin, low activityagainst 3-cyano-7-methoxycoumarin, 7-methoxycoumarin, 7-ethoxyresorufin, and 7-benzyloxyresorufin, very low activityagainst 7-ethoxycoumarin and no detectable activity against 7-pentoxyresorufin and 3-cyano-7-ethoxycoumarin (Table 2). Theoverall activity of the Pakistani CYP337B3v2 is comparable to thatof the Australian CYP337B3v1 (Table 2; Joußen et al., 2012), but it isless active against 7-benzyloxyresorufin and 7-methoxycoumarinjust as CYP337B1v4 is less active against these model substratesthan CYP337B1v1. This might be another indication that the Pak-istani CYP337B3v2 arose from CYP337B1v4 and the AustralianCYP337B3v1 from CYP337B1v1. The different activity could be dueto the nonsynonymous SNP at position 1093 resulting in a differentamino acid 365 (CYP337B1v1, 365I; CYP337B1v4, 365V) that islocated in the substrate recognition site 5 (Joußen et al., 2012) andcould therefore be important for substrate recognition and binding.
To confirm the role of CYP337B3v2 in the metabolism ofcypermethrin, in vitro assays were performed and analyzed byHPLC. The cypermethrin mixture (four trans- and four cis-isomers)used as parent compound was partially separated in trans- (44.4%)and cis-isomers (55.6%) on HPLC with retention times (Rt) of43.3min and 43.6min, respectively (Fig. 4Ab). Under the conditionsprovided, CYP337B3v2 was capable of metabolizing cypermethrinin 4 h to a main metabolite occurring in trans- (8.1%) and cis-configuration (19.8%) and possessing a Rt of 39.3 min and 39.6 min,respectively, and to a minor metabolite (1.5%) possessing a Rt of37.8 min (Fig. 4Ad). Overall, 29.3% of cypermethrin were metabo-lized in 4 h, while 70.7% unmetabolized cypermethrin (37.2% trans-and 33.5% cis-cypermethrin) were recovered. Recovery was about79%. These results show that CYP337B3v2 is more active on cis-isomers (turnover of 22.1%) than on trans-isomers (turnover of7.2%), which is consistent with statements in the literature that cis-isomers of cypermethrin are more sensitive to oxidative meta-bolism (Shono et al., 1979), while trans-isomers are more sensitiveto hydrolysis (Roberts and Hutson, 1999; Shono et al., 1979). Thisphenomenon was verified using a-cypermethrin as a substrate forCYP337B3v2. In total, the enzyme metabolized in 4 h 60.4% of theapplied a-cypermethrin resulting in 45.1% of the main metaboliteand 15.2% of the minor metabolite (Fig. 4Bc). The recovery wasabout 64%. No turnover of cypermethrin was detected by themicrosomal enzymes of the non-transgenic Ha2302 cells and themetabolism by CYP337B3v2 was inhibited completely by theabsence of NADPH and also by the addition of the P450 inhibitorpiperonyl butoxide, respectively (Fig. 4Ac and e and f).
A bioassay using the main metabolite revealed it to be notintrinsically toxic to susceptible larvae, as none of the treated larvaedied within 48 h, thus indicating that the hydroxylation is a bio-logically significant detoxification mechanism in vivo.
3.6. The main metabolite was identified as 40-hydroxy-a-cypermethrin
The main metabolite was isolated from scaled-up in vitro assaysperformed with a-cypermethrin as parent compound. a-Cyper-methrin was chosen to simplify the identification of the mainmetabolite by GC/EI-MS and 1H NMR; it consists only of two cis-isomers [(1S-cis, aR) and (1R-cis, aS)], that contribute about 25% tothe cypermethrin mixture and produce 90% of the insecticidal ac-tivity with the (1R-cis, aS)-isomer being the most toxic (Casidaet al., 1983). CYP337B3v2 metabolized on average 74% of theapplied a-cypermethrin in 24 h producing 46% of the mainmetabolite and 28% of the minor metabolite. The recovery was onlyabout 46%. In total, approximately 7.2 mg of the main metabolite (ina-cypermethrin equivalents), with a purity of almost 100% deter-mined at 230 nm by using the first HPLC system, could be isolated.The minor metabolite was lost during this isolation proceduremostlikely due to characteristics of the compound. The main metabolitewas further analyzed by GCeMS and 1H NMR.
Additionally using GCeMS, the main metabolite was separatedinto two peaks at 21.5 min and 21.7 min in a ratio of 1:5 (17% and83%, respectively). The mass spectra underlying both peaks belongto two different isomers of the same substance. The mass spectra(Figure S4) shows a molecular ion of m/z 431 that reflects the massof a-cypermethrin increased by the mass of 16, which indicates anadditional oxygen atom in the metabolite forming a hydroxylgroup. The fragment of m/z 224 is characteristic for the metaboliteand absent from the fragmentation pattern of the parent compoundsuggesting the hydroxyl group being attached to the aryloxy ring ofthe phenoxybenzyl alcohol moiety. Furthermore, the fragmenta-tion pattern shows that the fragments containing the two chlorineatoms of the acid moiety, indicated by a 10:6:1 isotope peak ratiowith a mass difference of m/z 2 in those fragments, are unchangedcompared to the parent compound.
The structure of the main metabolite was further elucidated bycomparing its 1H NMR spectra with that of a-cypermethrin(Table S5). In addition to extraction from the JHeH spinespincoupling constants, 1He1H connectivities were established by cross
Fig. 4. In vitro metabolism of cypermethrin by heterologously expressed CYP337B3v2. Depicted are HPLC chromatograms of in vitro metabolism studies with 4 nmol of cyper-methrin (A) and a-cypermethrin (B), respectively, per 0.8 mg of microsomal proteins and 4 h of incubation at 30 �C. Relevant parts of the chromatograms derived from detection at230 nm are displayed. Baselines were corrected by subtraction of a blank run. 1, cis-cypermethrin; 2, trans-cypermethrin; 3, 4'-hydroxy-cis-cypermethrin; 4, 4'-hydroxy-trans-cypermthrin; 5, putative cis-cypermethrin metabolite (hardly visible); 6, piperonyl butoxide. A. a, a-cypermethrin (reference compound); b, cypermethrin (reference compound); c,study performed with non-transgenic microsomes and NADPH regeneration system; d, study performed with CYP337B3v2 containing microsomes and NADPH regenerationsystem; e, study performed with CYP337B3v2 containing microsomes omitting the NADPH regeneration system; f, study performed with CYP337B3v2 containing microsomes,NADPH regeneration system, and 40 nmol of piperonyl butoxide. B. All studies were performed by using the NADPH regeneration system. a, a-cypermethrin (reference compound);b, study performed with non-transgenic microsomes; c, study performed with CYP337B3v2 containing microsomes.
A. Rasool et al. / Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 53 (2014) 54e6562
signals observed in the corresponding 1He1H COSY spectra. Thechemical shifts and J values of the signals of the acidmoiety [3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcylopropane carboxylate moiety]remained almost unchanged in the 1H NMR spectra of the metab-olite, excluding enzymatic modification in that part of the mole-cule. The signals of H-a and the four-spin system H-2/H-4 to H-6(for numbering of C atoms see Figure S4) exhibited only minorchanges of the chemical shifts suggesting that the cyanobenzyl unitof the alcohol moiety remained unchanged as well. The protons ofthe 3-phenoxy ring, which appeared in the parent a-cypermethrinas an AA'MM'C spin system, changed into an AA'MM0 characteristicfor a 1,4-disubstituted aryl ring. Hence, the new hydroxyl group isattached to C-4' of the 3-aryloxy ring and the main metabolite hasbeen identified as being 40-hydroxy-a-cypermethrin [a-cyano-3-(4-hydroxyphenoxy)-benzyl-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcylopropane carboxylate]. Comparable to the GS-MSanalysis, two isomers of this metabolite were found by 1H NMRin a ratio of 1:5 indicating that CYP337B3v2 is capable of metabo-lizing both isomers present in a-cypermethrin or that the twoisomers could be converted to each other spontaneously. Becausea-cypermethrin is a subset of cypermethrin the position of the newhydroxyl group is assumed to be the same for both compounds.
4. Discussion
The increasing insecticide resistance level of insect pest specieshinders their control and threatens agriculture. Different resistancemechanisms to pyrethroids have been reported in H. armigera,including target site insensitivity (Gunning, 1996; Gunning et al.,1991; McCaffery, 1998), metabolism by carboxylesterases(Gunning et al., 2007, 1999, 1996; Young et al., 2006, 2005), andP450s (Daly and Fisk, 1992; Heckel et al., 1998; Pittendrigh et al.,1997; Ranasinghe and Hobbs, 1999, 1998; Ranasinghe et al., 1998;Wee et al., 2008; Yang et al., 2004; Brun-Barale et al., 2010).
Recently, we described a new P450 gene, CYP337B3, that arose byunequal crossing-over between CYP337B1 and CYP337B2 from theAustralian fenvalerate resistantH. armigera strainTWB (Joußen et al.,2012). Here, we report on the same resistance gene that is evidentlynot restricted to Australian populations as previously thought, but is
also present in cypermethrin resistant populations in Pakistan. Full-length cloning and sequencing of the Pakistani CYP337B3v2 revealeda number of sequence differences compared to the AustralianCYP337B3v1. The two alleles differ by three nonsynonymous SNPsand the resulting differences in the deduced amino acid sequencelocatedat theC-terminus reflect thedifferencespreviously describedbetween the CYP337B1 allozymes (Joußen et al., 2012). Thus, theAustralian CYP337B3v1 resembles CYP337B1v1 or CYP337B1v3 at its3’ end, while the Pakistani CYP337B3v2 resembles CYP337B1v4.Furthermore, it is possible that the unequal crossover event shifted afew nucleotides up-stream of the proposed position of the crossoverevent of the Australian CYP337B3v1 (Joußen et al., 2012). In addition,the intron differs in length and sequence between the PakistaniCYP337B3v2 (1017 bp) and the Australian CYP337B3v1 (921 bp).Taking all three lines of evidence, it is likely that rather than in-dividuals ofH. armigera carryingCYP337B3 fromAustralia to Pakistanor vice versa, CYP337B3 instead evolved independently twice byunequal crossing-over between CYP337B2 and two differentCYP337B1 alleles. The very similar crossover region was most likelyfavoured by a longer stretch of sequence identity between CYP337B1and CYP337B2. However, the verification of this hypothesis ishampered by the fact that the parental genes, CYP337B1 andCYP337B2, have so far not been found in Pakistani populations. Theparental genes were probably selected against due to high selectionpressure by pyrethroids, which selects for individuals homozygousfor CYP337B3v2 which consequently have lost CYP337B1 andCYP337B2, because only heterozygous individuals can possess allthree genes (Joußen et al., 2012).
The slightly different amino acid sequence of the PakistaniCYP337B3v2 seems to have no impact on its metabolic capacityagainst pyrethroids compared to the Australian CYP337B3v1. Theheterologous enzyme showed a similar activity towards the modelsubstrates tested and acts in the same position on cypermethrin asthe Australian CYP337B3v1 acts on fenvalerate resulting in 4'-hydroxycypermethrin identified as the main metabolite. The for-mation of the corresponding metabolite could be explained by thefact that fenvalerate and cypermethrin share the same phenox-ybenzyl alcohol moiety. It is known that larvae of Heliothis virescensand H. armigera are capable of metabolizing trans-cypermethrin by
A. Rasool et al. / Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 53 (2014) 54e65 63
hydrolysis to trans-3-(2,2-dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcyclopropane carboxylic acid and by oxidation to 2'- and 4'-hydroxy-trans-cypermethrin (Lee et al., 1989; Little et al., 1989). Both cis- andtrans-cypermethrin are oxidatively metabolized by mouse livermicrosomes mainly to 4'-hydroxycypermethrin, but also to 5-hydroxycypermethrin and trans-hydroxymethyl-cypermethrin,that are further oxidized to the corresponding aldehydes and car-boxylic acids (Shono et al., 1979). Carboxylesterases of the gut andthe integument of Trichoplusia ni larvae hydrolyze trans-cyper-methrin two- to six-fold faster than cis-cypermethrin (Ishaaya andCasida, 1980). It is possible that the minor metabolite, that wasdetected after incubation of CYP337B3v2 with a-cypermethrin butremained unidentified, was a hydroxymethyl-cypermethrin. Ourresults support the observations that cis-isomers of cypermethrinare more sensitive to oxidation than trans-isomers (Shono et al.,1979) as CYP337B3v2 is more active on cis-cypermethrin than ontrans-cypermethrin.
Toxicity bioassays including the resistant FSD strain, the resis-tant TWBR line, and the susceptible TWBS line revealed a 7- and 6-fold resistance, respectively, of the resistant larvae compared to thesusceptible larvae demonstrating similar resistance levels in thePakistani strain and the resistant Australian line. This indicates thatthe resistance level observed is most likely due to the metabolicactivity of CYP337B3, because the presence of CYP337B3 is themostimportant difference between the resistant and the susceptiblelines. We also demonstrated in a bioassay with susceptible larvaethat the main metabolite 4'-hydroxy-a-cypermethrin is either notintrinsically toxic, or that it could be easily metabolized to anontoxic compound even in the susceptible larvae, as we previ-ously reported for 4'-hydroxyfenvalerate (Joußen et al., 2012). Thehydroxylated metabolite may be further glycosylated in the larvaeincreasing its hydrophilicity even more compared to the highlylipophilic (log KOW of 6.6; Roberts and Hutson, 1999) and almostwater insoluble (4 mg L�1 at 20 �C; Roberts and Hutson, 1999)parent compound, which would greatly facilitate its excretion.
Comparison of resistance levels indicates that other mecha-nisms, including target-site insensitivity, may be important in otherpyrethroid-resistant strains of H. armigera. The resistance levelobserved in the FSD strain is much lower than reported by Yanget al. (2004) for the Pakistani field collected strain PAK ofH. armigerawith a resistance factor (RF) of 4100 (to cypermethrin),by Alvi et al. (2012) for another Pakistani population with a RF of1949 (to cypermethrin), by Forrester et al. (1993) for an Australianstrain with a RF of 25 (to cypermethrin) and by Ahmad andMcCaffery (1999) for a resistant Thai strain with a RF of 20 (totrans-cypermethrin). Tan and McCaffery (2007) describe a 182-foldresistance of the Chinese H. armigera strain CMR to cypermethrin, a487-fold resistance to cis-cypermethrin and an 86-fold resistanceto trans-cypermethrin. Because the resistance factor is calculatedby the division of the LD50 of the resistant strain by the LD50 of thesusceptible strain, both an increased LD50 of the resistant strain anda decreased LD50 of the susceptible strain may lead to an increasedresistance factor. A comparison of the LD50 of the Pakistani FSD(532 ng/larva) to the Chinese CMR (310 ng/larva) regardingcypermethrin reveals that FSD is more resistant than CMR. The RFreported by Tan and McCaffery (2007) is higher because theycompared the CMR strain to the extremely susceptible Readingstrain, a laboratory strain that was collectedmore than 20 years agoin South Africa, possessing a LD50 of 2 ng per larva while the sus-ceptible TWBS line possesses a LD50 of 77 ng per larva, thus being39-fold more resistant than Reading. However, the Pakistani PAKstrain exhibits a LD50 of 23,752 ng per larva (Yang et al., 2004) and isthus 45-fold more resistant than the FSD strain. The susceptiblelaboratory SCD strain used by Yang et al. (2004), which was origi-nally collected from the Cote D'Ivoire in the 1970s andwas provided
by Bayer CropScience, possesses a LD50 of 5.8 ng per larva so that itis 13-fold less resistant than the susceptible TWBS line. The resis-tance level of FSD can be suppressed by PBO to the resistance levelfound in TWBS but not below this level. This indicates that FSD hasa basal resistance level similar to TWBS but is more resistantbecause of the presence of CYP337B3, and that FSD and TWB havean additional resistance mechanism compared to Reading and SCDthat is not suppressible by PBO.
The AFLP analysis in the backcross of FSD with TWBS did notidentify any further genes in addition to CYP337B3v2 contributing tothe cypermethrin resistance of the FSD strain. The phenotype ofresistance, and theCYP337B3v2gene,werebothmapped to the linkagegroup homologous to B. mori Chromosome 15, while expression dif-ferences of other P450swerenot influencedby this linkage group. Thisshows that up-regulation of a P450 gene in a resistant strain does notnecessarily prove its involvement in resistance (as previously pointedout by Brun-Barale et al. (2010) for African H. armigera). Althoughrarely attempted, testing for linkage between the phenotype of resis-tance and the phenotype of P450 expression level is important. Notonly can this test rule out involvement of upregulation in resistance(e.g. Grubor and Heckel (2007) for CYP6B enzymes in Australianpyrethroid-resistant H. armigera), it can also confirm the role ofupregulation. For example, in the classic case of P450-mediatedinsecticide resistance in the housefly, the genetic factor causingconstitutive overexpression of CYP6A1 maps to the same locus deter-mining diazinon resistance, while the diazinon-metabolizing CYP6A1itselfmaps to a different chromosome (Cohen et al.,1994; Carin~o et al.,1994; Sabourault et al., 2001).
Multiple origins of the same insecticide resistance mechanismhave been convincingly documented by recent studies in otherorganisms. Identical point mutations in the voltage-gated sodiumchannel, the primary target of pyrethroid insecticides, have beenfound associated with different haplotypes in different geograph-ical regions, in mosquitoes (Pinto et al., 2007) and in houseflies(Rinkevich et al., 2012). Similarly, distinctly different haplotypebackgrounds have been found to harbour the same point mutationsin an esterase gene conferring organophosphorus resistance in thesheep blowfly (Newcomb et al., 2005). Such examples are rare,although not unexpected in cases where a single amino acid sub-stitution can confer target-site insensitivity, or dramatically alterthe substrate specificity of an enzyme. The background nucleotidesubstitution ratewould be the rate-limiting factor in the occurrenceof such multiple origins. Although we cannot estimate the back-ground rate of unequal crossing-over, it is likely to be much lower;attesting to the powerful selective force of insecticide resistance inbringing these extremely rare events to the fore.
We have found that the chimeric P450 gene CYP337B3 is morewidespread among populations of H. armigera from differentgeographical origins than previously thought, and that the encodedenzyme confers also cross-resistance to at least one more pyre-throid insecticide than determined earlier. These findings greatlyincrease the importance of this resistance mechanism, which mayplay a prominent role in the pyrethroid resistance of H. armigeraworldwide. The fact that the presence or absence of CYP337B3 canbe easily detected in a population by a simple screening PCR is apowerful tool to rapidly distinguish resistant from susceptiblepopulations in the field. Currently, we are investigating H. armigerapopulations from different countries to determine the geographicaldistribution of CYP337B3 and to address the possible multipleorigin of the remarkable CYP337B3 gene.
Acknowledgements
We thank Dr. Heiko Vogel for providing access to the cDNA li-brary of the H. armigera strain TWB, Dr. Mushtaq Ahmad for
A. Rasool et al. / Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 53 (2014) 54e6564
guidance in performing toxicity bioassays, Dr. Yannick Pauchet forhis help with the 5' and 3' RACE-PCRs, Dr. Melanie Unbehend, AnneKarpinski, and Susanne Donnerhacke for their help in the AFLPanalysis, Domenica Schnabelrauch for sequencing, and AnnekePurz and Rico Arnold for technical assistance in rearing the TWBSand TWBR lines. Financial support was provided by the HigherEducation Commission of Pakistan and the Max-Planck-Gesellschaft, Germany. N.J. was supported by a grant from theDeutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG, Germany; JO 855/1-1).
Appendix A. Supplementary data
Supplementary data related to this article can be found at http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2014.07.006.
References
Aheer, G.M., Aziz, M.A., Hameed, A., Ali, A., 2009. Evaluation of resistance todifferent insecticides in field strains of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae) in Punjab. Pak. Entomol. Res. 39, 159e167.
Ahmad, M., 2004. Potentiation/antagonism of deltamethrin and cypermethrinswith organophosphate insecticides in the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armi-gera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 80, 31e42.
Ahmad,M., Arif, M.I., Ahmad, Z.,1995.Monitoring insecticide resistance ofHelicoverpaarmigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Pakistan. J. Econ. Entolmol. 88, 771e776.
Ahmad, M., Arif, M.I., Attique, M.R., 1997. Pyrethroid resistance of Helicoverpaarmigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Pakistan. Bull. Entomol. Res. 87, 343e347.
Ahmad, M., McCaffery, A.R., 1999. Penetration and metabolism of trans-cyper-methrin in a susceptible and a pyrethroid-resistant strain of Helicoverpa armi-gera. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 65, 6e14.
Aljanabi, S.M., Martinez, I., 1997. Universal and rapid salt-extraction of high qualitygenomic DNA for PCR-based techniques. Nucleic Acids Res. 25, 4692e4693.
Alvi, A.H.K., Sayyed, A.H., Naeem, M., Ali, M., 2012. Field evolved resistance inHelicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) to Bacillus thuringiensis toxinCyp1Ac in Pakistan. PLoS ONE 7, e47309.
Bradford, M.M., 1976. A rapid and sensitive method for the quantitation of micro-gram quantities of protein utilizing the principle of protein-dye binding. Anal.Biochem. 72, 248e254.
Brun-Barale, A., H�ema, O., Martin, T., Suraporn, S., Audant, P., Sezutsu, H.,Feyereisen, R., 2010. Multiple P450 genes overexpressed in deltamethrin-resistant strains of Helicoverpa armigera. Pest Manag. Sci. 66, 900e909.
Carin~o, F.A., Koener, J.F., Plapp Jr., F.W., Feyereisen, R., 1994. Constitutive over-expression of the cytochrome P450 gene CYP6A1 in a housefly strain withmetabolic resistance to insecticides. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 24, 411e418.
Casida, J.E., Gammon, D.W., Glickman, A.H., Lawrence, L.J., 1983. Mechanisms ofselective action of pyrethroid insecticides. Ann. Rev. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 23,413e438.
Cohen, M.B., Koener, J.F., Feyereisen, R., 1994. Structure and chromosomal locali-zation of CYP6A1, a cytochrome P450-encoding gene from the housefly. Gene146, 267e272.
Daly, J.C., Fisk, J.H., 1992. Inheritance of metabolic resistance to the synthetic py-rethroids in Australian Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Bull.Entomol. Res. 82, 5e12.
Forrester, N.W., Cahill, M., Bird, L.J., Layland, J.K., 1993. Management of pyrethroidand endosulfan resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) inAustralia. Bull. Entomol. Res. Suppl. 1, 1e132.
Grubor, V.D., Heckel, D.G., 2007. Evaluation of the role of CYP6B cytochrome P450sin pyrethroid resistant Helicoverpa armigera. Insect Mol. Biol. 16, 15e23.
Gunning, R.V.,1996. Bioassay for detecting pyrethroid nerve insensitivity in AustralianHelicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 89, 816e819.
Gunning, R.V., Easton, C.S., Balfe, M.E., Ferris, I.G., 1991. Pyrethroid resistancemechanisms in Australian Helicoverpa armigera. Pestic. Sci. 33, 473e490.
Gunning, R.V., Moores, G.D., Devonshire, A.L., 1999. Esterase inhibitors synergise thetoxicity of pyrethroids in Australian Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) (Lepidop-tera: Noctuidae). Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 63, 50e62.
Gunning, R.V., Moores, G.D., Devonshire, A.L., 1996. Esterases and esfenvalerateresistance in Australian Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) Lepidoptera:Noctuidae.Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 54, 12e23.
Gunning, R.V., Moores, G.D., Jewess, P., Boyes, A.L., Devonshire, A.L., Khambay, B.P.S.,2007. Use of pyrethroid analogues to identify key structural features forenhanced esterase resistance in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera:Noctuidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 63, 569e575.
Heckel, D.G., Gahan, L.J., Daly, J.C., Trowell, S., 1998. A genomic approach to un-derstanding Heliothis and Helicoverpa resistance to chemical and biologicalinsecticides. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 353, 1713e1722.
Heckel, D.G., Gahan, L.J., Liu, Y.-B., Tabashnik, B.E., 1999. Genetic mapping of resis-tance to Bacillus thuringiensis toxins in diamondback moth using biphasiclinkage analysis. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 96, 8373e8377.
Ishaaya, I., Casida, J.E., 1980. Properties and toxicological significance of esteraseshydrolyzing permethrin and cypermethrin in Trichoplusia ni larval gut andintegument. Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 14, 178e184.
Joußen, N., Agnolet, S., Lorenz, S., Sch€one, S.E., Ellinger, R., Schneider, B.,Heckel, D.G., 2012. Resistance of Australian Helicoverpa armigera to fenvalerateis due to the chimeric P450 enzyme CYP337B3. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 109,15206e15211.
Joyner, K., Gould, F., 1985. Developmental consequences of cannibalism in Heliothiszea (Lepidoptera, Noctuidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 78, 24e28.
Kaiser, T.S., Heckel, D.G., 2012. Genetic architecture of local adaptation in lunar anddiurnal emergence times of the marine midge Clunio marinus (Chironomidae,Diptera). PloS ONE 7, e32092.
Lee, K.-S., Walker, C.H., McCaffery, A., Ahmad, M., Little, E., 1989. Metabolism oftrans-cypermethrin by Heliothis armigera and H. virescens. Pestic. Biochem.Physiol. 34, 49e57.
Little, E.J., McCaffery, A.R., Walker, C.H., Parker, T., 1989. Evidence for an enhancedmetabolism of cypermethrin by a monooxygenase in a pyrethroid-resistantstrain of the tobacco budworm (Heliothis virescens F.). Pestic. Biochem. Phys-iol. 34, 58e68.
McCaffery, A.R., 1998. Resistance to insecticides in heliothine Lepidoptera: a globalview. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. Lond. B Biol. Sci. 353, 1735e1750.
Nibouche, S., Bu�es, R., Toubon, J.-F., Poitout, S., 1998. Allozyme polymorphism in thecotton bollworm Helicoverpa armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae): comparison ofAfrican and European populations. Heredity 80, 438e445.
Newcomb, R.D., Gleeson, D.M., Yong, C.G., Russell, R.J., Oakeshott, J.G., 2005. Mul-tiple mutations and gene duplications conferring organophosphorus insecticideresistance have been selected at the Rop-1 locus of the sheep blowfly, Luciliacuprina. J. Mol. Evol. 60, 207e220.
Pinto, J., Lynd, A., Vicente, J.L., Santolamazza, F., Randle, N.P., Gentile, G., Moreno, M.,Simard, F., Charlwood, J.D., do Ros�ario, V.E., Caccone, A., della Torre, A.,Donnelly, M.J., 2007. Multiple origins of knockdown resistance mutations in theAfrotropical mosquito vector Anopheles gambiae. PLoS ONE 2, e1243.
Pittendrigh, B., Aronstein, K., Zinkovsky, E., Andreev, O., Campbell, B., Daly, J.,Trowell, S., ffrench-Constant, R.H., 1997. Cytochrome P450 genes from Heli-coverpa armigera: expression in a pyrethroid-susceptible and -resistant strain.Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol. 27, 507e512.
Ranasinghe, C., Hobbs, A.A., 1999. Induction of cytochrome P450 CYP6B7 and cy-tochrome b5 mRNAs from Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) by pyrethroid in-secticides in organ culture. Insect Mol. Biol. 8, 443e447.
Ranasinghe, C., Hobbs, A.A., 1998. Isolation and characterization of two cytochromeP450 cDNA clones for CYP6B6 and CYP6B7 from Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner):possible involvement of CYP6B7 in pyrethroid resistance. Insect Biochem. Mol.Biol. 28, 571e580.
Ranasinghe, C., Campbell, B., Hobbs, A.A., 1998. Over-expression of cytochromeP450 CYP6B7 mRNA and pyrethroid resistance in Australian populations ofHelicoverpa armigera (Hübner). Pestic. Sci. 54, 195e202.
Rinkevich, F.D., Hedtke, S.M., Leichter, C.A., Harris, S.A., Su, C., Brady, S.G., Taskin, V.,Qiu, X., Scott, J.G., 2012. Multiple origins of kdr-type resistance in the house fly,Musca domestica. PLoS ONE 7, e52761.
Roberts, T., Hutson, D., 1999. Metabolic Pathways of Agrochemicals e Part Two:Insecticides and Fungicides. R. Soc. Chem., Cambridge, pp. 610e622.
Robinson, R., 1971. Lepidoptera Genetics. Pergamon Press, Oxford.Sabourault, C., Guzov, V.M., Koener, J.F., Claudianos, C., Plapp Jr., F.W., Feyereisen, R.,
2001. Overproduction of a P450 that metabolizes diazinon is linked to a loss-of-function in the chromosome 2 ali-esterase (MdaE7) gene in resistant houseflies. Insect Mol. Biol. 10, 609e618.
Sahara, K., Yoshido, A., Shibata, F., Fujikawa, N., Okabe, T., Tanaka-Okuyama, M.,Yasukochi, Y., 2013. FISH identification of Helicoverpa armigera and Mamestrabrassicae chromosomes by BAC and fosmid probes. Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol.43, 644e653.
Shono, T., Ohsawa, K., Casida, J.E., 1979. Mechanism of trans- and cis-permethrin,trans- and cis-cypermethrin, and decamethrin by microsomal enzymes. J. Agric.Food Chem. 27, 316e325.
Simpson, A.J., Brown, S.A., 2005. Purge NMR: effective and easy solvent suppression.J. Magn. Reson. 175, 340e346.
Stewart, A., 2013. http://agfax.com/2013/03/25/caterpillars-attack-brazils-crops/,9th of January 2014.
Suomalainen, E., Cook, L.M., Turner, J.R., 1973. Achiasmatic oogenesis in the heli-coniine butterflies. Hereditas 74, 302e304.
Tan, J., McCaffery, A.R., 2007. Efficacy of various pyrethroid structures against ahighly metabolically resistant isogenic strain of Helicoverpa armigera (Lepi-doptera: Noctuidae) from China. Pest Manag. Sci. 63, 960e968.
Tang, Q., Yan, Y., Zhao, X., Wang, C., 2005. Testes and chromosomes in interspecifichybrids between Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) and Helicoverpa assulta(Guen�ee). Chin. Sci. Bull. 50, 1212e1217.
Tay, W.T., Soria, M.F., Walsh, T., Thomazoni, D., Silvie, P., Behere, G.T., Anderson, C.,Downes, S., 2013. A brave newworld for an old world pest: Helicoverpa armigera(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Brazil. PLoS ONE 8, e80134.
Vos, P., Hogers, R., Bleeker, M., Reijans, M., van De Lee, T., Hornes, M., Friters, A.,Pot, J., Paleman, J., Kuiper, M., 1995. AFLP: a new technique for DNA finger-printing. Nucleic Acids Res. 23, 4407e4414.
Waxman, D.J., Chang, T.K.H., 2006. Use of 7-ethoxycoumarin to monitor multipleenzymes in the human CYP1, CYP2, and CYP3 families. In: Phillips, I.R.,Shephard, E.A. (Eds.), Methods in Molecular Biology, Cytochrome P450 Pro-tocols, second ed., vol. 320. Humana, Totowa, NJ, pp. 153e156.
A. Rasool et al. / Insect Biochemistry and Molecular Biology 53 (2014) 54e65 65
Wee, C.W., Lee, S.F., Robin, C., Heckel, D.G., 2008. Identification of candidate genesfor fenvalerate resistance in Helicoverpa armigera using cDNA-AFLP. Insect Mol.Biol. 17, 351e360.
Yang, Y., Wu, Y., Chen, S., Devine, G.J., Denholm, I., Jewess, P., Moores, G.D., 2004. Theinvolvement of microsomal oxidases in pyrethroid resistance in Helicoverpaarmigera from Asia. Insect. Biochem. Mol. Biol. 34, 763e773.
Yoshido, A., Bando, H., Yasukochi, Y., Sahara, K., 2005. The Bombyx mori karyotypeand the assignment of linkage groups. Genetics 170, 675e685.
Young, S.J., Gunning, R.V., Moores, G.D., 2006. Effect of pretreatment with piperonylbutoxide on pyrethroid efficacy against insecticide-resistant Helicoverpa
armigera (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) and Bemisia tabaci (Sternorrhyncha: Aleyr-odidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 62, 114e119.
Young, S.J., Gunning, R.V., Moores, G.D., 2005. The effect of piperonyl butoxide onpyrethroid-resistance-associated esterases in Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner)(Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Pest Manag. Sci. 61, 397e401.
Zhang, H., Yin, W., Zhao, J., Jin, L., Yang, Y., Wu, S., Tabashnik, B.E., Wu, Y., 2011. Earlywarning of cotton bollworm resistance associated with intensive planting of Btcotton in China. PLoS ONE 6, e22874.
1
Supplementary Material
Figures and tables
Figure S1. Maximum-likelihood tree of 63 P450 proteins from H. armigera. Protein
sequences were aligned using Clustal W, and the tree was constructed using RAxML on the
CIPRES Science Gateway server and drawn using FigTree. Asterisks denote proteins that
were not investigated using RT-qPCR in this study.
2
Figure S2. AFLP banding pattern and presence of CYP337B3 associated with resistance. (A) Part of a representative AFLP gel showing the pattern for an AFLP fragment (indicated
by the arrowhead) strongly associated with resistance. (B) The same individuals of the
female-informative backcross tested in the AFLP analysis were screened by PCR for the
presence or absence of CYP337B3 revealing a strong correlation between the presence of
CYP337B3 and resistance. A plasmid containing CYP337B3 served as a positive control and a
water sample as a negative control.
Figure S3. mRNA abundance of three P450 genes in backcross larvae (BC) possessing
the resistance gene CYP337B3v2 or lacking CYP337B3v2 compared to larvae of the
resistant FSD strain and the susceptible TWBS line. Error bars represent the standard
deviation; bars from the same gene sharing the same letter are not significantly different at p <
0.05.
3
Figure S4. Mass spectra of 4′-hydroxy-α-cypermethrin in comparison to its parent
compound α-cypermethrin. Peaks corresponding to the fragments indicated by the lines in
the chemical structure are highlighted by their masses. The 10:6:1 isotope peak ratio with a
mass difference of m/z 2 of some fragments indicates the presence of the chlorine atom in
those fragments. The molecular ion of the metabolite appears at m/z 431 reflecting an increase
by the mass of 16 compared to its parent compound α-cypermethrin (m/z 415). Carbon atoms
of the chemical structure of 4′-hydroxy-α-cypermethrin are numbered consecutively matching
the numbers used in the analysis of the 1H-NMR spectrum (Table S5). *, chiral centers.
4
Table S1. Primers for screening of CYP337B1, CYP337B2, CYP337B3, for detection of
CYP337B3 in the AFLP analysis, for cloning of CYP337B3v2 and the intron region and
for the ribosomal protein genes
Gene Forward primer (5'-3') Reverse primer (5'-3')
Screening
CYP337B1 AATAATAAGCAACGCCAATGACTTAC TGCAATAACAACTATTACATTTTGAATAAA
CYP337B2 AATAATAACCAGTCCAAACGATGTGT CGCAATTATAGTCACTATGATTGCATATA
CYP337B3 AATAATAACCAGTCCAAACGATGTGT TGCAATAACAACTATTACATTTTGAATAAA
AFLP
CYP337B3 CGATGCCAGAACTAATCAAATCG TCAATTTCCTCATGTAGTTTTGCC
Cloning
CYP337B3v2 CACGATGGTGTTCGTAATATTACTC GATTTATATGTCTCTTAACTTTAATTCATAACC
Intron
CYP337B3 AATAATGATTCCAGTGTTCGGTCTT AAGGTAAAACGACGTAACAGCCA
Ribosomal genes
RPS23 AAAGAAGGAAAGGCCACGTT ACAACACAGCTTTGCAGCAG
RPL8 ACTTCCGTGACCCGTACAAG AGGATTGTGGCCGATAACAG
RPL10A CGCTGAGGCACTCAAGAAA GAGGGATTCTGATGCAAGGA
m14_FLX ATCTCGCCTGGATCAACACT GATGTTCATCGGACCCAGAC
5
Table S2. Primer combinations used for male- and female-informative backcrosses and
number of informative AFLP markers per cross and primer combination
Mse Eco Male-informative Female-informative
CAT
AAG(700) 15 16
CAT(800) 12 11
ACC(700) 7 9
CGC(800) 7 10
TAC(700) 17 19
GTA(800) 12 12
ACA
AAG(700) 15 8
CAT(800) 7 6
CGC(800) 13 13
GTA(800) 11 14
ACG
AAG(700) 14 12
CAT(800) 10 8
ACC(700) 10 10
CGC(800) 9 5
CGA
AAG(700) 10 8
CAT(800) 8 9
ACC(700) 10 11
ACT(800) 7 7
CGC(800) 7 7
CTT
AAG(700) 13 9
CAT(800) 5 9
ACC(700) 11 9
ACT(800) 13 11
CGC(800) 9 3
Total markers 252 236
6
Table S3. List of primer pairs used for RT-qPCR and the expression analysis Gene Forward primer (5'-3') Reverse Primer (5'-3') GenBank Accession no.
CYP4G8 TCTGACCTGAAGGAGGAGGA TAGCAGGCTTTGGTTGGTTT KM016724
CYP4G9 CCACCCTCAGCACTACAAGG GGTCCAGCACTGAATGGAAT KM016725
CYP4G26 TGACCTCCGATGTGACTGAG TCTGCCTGGGTTCAATCTTC KM016723
CYP4L5 GTGCTGGTCCGAGAAATTGT GTTCAGGCTCTTGAGGTGCT KM016727
CYP4L11 GCATTCTTGGACCTGTTGCT TCGTGACCCTCAAACATGAA KM016726
CYP4M6v2 AATAGCCGTAGCGGAGGTTT CAGGTCCTTCGTTCCTGAAG KM016729
CYP4M7v2 AGCGCTGGTCCTAGAAATTG ATGGTTTCGTCACTGGCTTC KM016730
CYP4M10v2 ATTGCGGAACTTCGTATTG TGAAATTGACGACCACTGGA KM016728
CYP4S2 CAGCTTGATGCCCACGAT GCGTATGGCGTCGTCTAGTT KM016732
CYP4S12 TGCGTAACTTCAAGCTGGTG AGATAGGGTCAACGGGTCTG KM016731
CYP4S13 CTATGCATCCGTACGCCTTT CGACAAATTCCACTCAGCAC EF591060
CYP4AU1 TGCAGTAGTGCCAATGGTGT TCGGTCCACACTGTTCTCTG KM016722
CYP6B2v3 ATTGGACCGAAAGGAGGAAT TTCATGGTCCGTTGTCGTTA KM016746
CYP6B6v2 ATTGGACCGAAAGGAGGAAT CCGTTACTTGTACCGTCATTATAGC KM016748
CYP6B8 CAATGGATATCAGCCCGTTT GCAGGCTTCTTGTTGACGAC KM016749
CYP6B43 TTGTAGGGAGGTTATTGAAGCAG TGCCTTCTCGTCTCAAGTCC KM016747
CYP6AB9 CATAGGTGAGCGGCTAGGTC TGCACTATGCTGGACTGAGG KM016734
CYP6AB10 TGTGTTGGTGCCAGATTAGG CTACGAAACCTTCGGAAACG KM016733
CYP6AE11 TCTCACATTGCCTTTCACTCC ACTCCCAAAGAACCCACTCC KM016735
CYP6AE12 AGATGAGGCTCTGCGTCTGT CAGATGCACCCTCAGACCTT KM016736
CYP6AE14 GGATCCGGAGGAGTATAGGC TACAAAGTCTCGGGCCTTCA KM016737
CYP6AE15v2 CCCTTACTGAGCCGATTTGA ATCTGCGTGTCGGGAGATAG KM016738
CYP6AE16 GTTCCTGCCTGAGAACAAGC CTTCGTCTTCATCCCTGGAG KM016739
CYP6AE17 GTTCCTGCCTGAGAACAAGC TAATTATTCCCGCCGTCATC KM016740
CYP6AE19 GCATATGTTCTTGCGCCTTC TTTGATTGCCCATGAATCTG KM016741
CYP6AE20v2 CTGGCAGGCCTTGTCACTAT GCATCGAACACCAGGTCTCT KM016742
CYP6AE23 ACAGCTTGTTGCCAGTTAAGC ACCGTCTATTTGCGTCCGTA KM016744
CYP6AE24 CCAAATTGAGAACCTCCTCCT CCACGCACTTAGGAACACAA KM016743
CYP6AN1 ATCGAAGAGTTGGGCATCAC TATCCGGCATGAACTTCTCC KM016745
CYP9A3 GTGCTTATTCGGGAGATGGA CCCTGTAGCTGCATGTTGAA KM016754
CYP9A12 TCTGCGAGATGAAGGTGATG TTTCAGTCGCATGTTGAAGG AY371318
CYP9A14 ATGGAAGTCAGCGAGCAGAT TATCACATCGTTGGCGTAGC KM016750
CYP9A15 GGATCGAGGTTTGCTCTCTG ATTGTTAGCCGCAAGTTTGG KM016751
CYP9A17 CTATGGGCGGCACGTTTAT CCACTATTGTTTGAGCGGAGA KM016752
CYP9A23v3 CAGATCTTACGGCACATGGA AAGCCAGTGTCCTCCTTTCA KM016753
CYP9A34 TGTGCGAGATGAAAGCGATA AGGTTGAACTGATCGGGAGA KM016755
CYP9G5 TTCCCGAACCAGACAAGTTT ATCATCGCGAACCTCATACC KM016757
CYP9AJ1 GCAGCAAAGGTATTCCTGGT CCTGGGTCTCAGTATGAATGC KM016756
CYP302A1 CAAGTCCCTCAAAGCGTGA TTGCTTTAGCCCATTGCAC KM016700
CYP304F1 CCTGCCGTACAGTTTGTCCT GACGACGCGGTCTATCTCTT KM016701
CYP305B1 AGTACTCATGTCGCTGGGAGA CGCTTTCGTCAATGAACCTT KM016702
CYP306A1 ACCTCTGTTACGCTGGCTTG TAGTTGAGAGCCGTCGACCT KM016703
CYP307A1 GCAGGAGTTTGAAATAGGAGCA GAATCAATGCTTTCTGGGAATC KM016704
CYP321A5 TGGAATGGGAAACAGGACAT CTGCTGGCTTTCTGGGATAG KM016705
CYP321B1 CGAGATACGCACGAATTCAA TTGTACTGGATGCCTCCTTTG KM016706
CYP324A1 TATGCCGTTTGGAGAAGGAC TGTTTGGCAGCACTCTCACT KM016707
CYP332A1 CCCGAGGTTCTGCATAGGTA CCACGATCTTAGGTGCATCA KM016708
CYP333A1 CGGCTTCGGAATAAGGAGTT CCCTCCCACGTAACTTTGAA KM016709
CYP333B3 GGCCAACACAGTCACAGCTA GGACACAATTTCCTCCCTCA KM016710
CYP340G1 GCAGATGTCACCAAGATGGA CCTCATCCTCATCACCAACA KM016711
CYP340H1 CCGGACAAGGATCAGTTCAT CCGATACAGTTGCGTCTGC KM016712
7
CYP340H2 TATGCACACGCAACAGATGA GCTTGCCGAAGTCCATTTAT KM016713
8
Table S3. Continued
Gene Forward primer (5'-3') Reverse Primer (5'-3') GenBank Accession no.
CYP340J1 TCAATATGGCGGATGAACAA TGGATTTGACCCAAGAAGGA KM016714
CYP340K1 ACGGCAAACAAGACTTTGCT CGCCAACATCACCTTTCATA KM016715
CYP341B2 GGCTACCAATACGCGATGAT GCCATTACTTCTGGCCATGT KM016716
CYP341B7 AATGACACCCGTCATCCATT AGGTCACTATGCAGCCAAGG KM016717
CYP354A3 GGTCTGAGATTCGCCATGTT CTGAATGGGATCAACCGTCT KM016718
CYP367A8 TGAACCAGAAAGGGCCACTA TTTGCTGTCTTCCGTTGGTT KM016719
CYP367B2 AGAGCGGTTCAATCCAGAAA TGCCGAAGTATCTTCCCAAA KM016720
CYP428A1 CCATCTGGCAAACTCATTAGC GGCCTTTGTCCATTGAAGTG KM016721
eIF4A AGCAAATCCAAAAGGTGGTG AGAGCACGGCGAGTTATCAT JK139881
RPS18 ACTGCCATCAAGGGTGTTG TGTATTGCCTGGGGTTAGACA JK127315
9
Table S4. P450 mRNA expression levels in three strains of Helicoverpa armigera as
determined by RT-qPCR. Copy number estimates ± standard error of the mean are given per
1000 copies of mRNA for reference gene eIF4A. Ratios of copy numbers are shown in
separate columns for up- or down-regulation in each resistant strain, relative to the susceptible
TWBS strain. sig., statistical significance of t-test: ns P > 0.05; * P < 0.05, ** P < 0.01, *** P
< 0.001, nd, not detected.
P450 FSD vs TWBS
sig. FSD ± SE per 1000 eIF4A
TWBS ± SE per 1000 eIF4A
TWBR ± SE per 1000 eIF4A
TWBR vs TWBS sig.
up down up down
CYP340G1 146.6 ** 40.1 ± 8.0 0.3 ± 0.2 1.6 ± 0.4 5.7 ns
CYP340H1 15.3 *** 12.3 ± 1.5 0.8 ± 0.1 6.2 ± 2.0 7.7 ns
CYP341B2 6.5 ** 7.1 ± 1.2 1.1 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.1 1.6 ns
CYP9AJ1 5.0 ** 2.2 ± 0.4 0.4 ± 0.1 0.7 ± 0.2 1.5 ns
CYP340H2 4.6 * 0.1 ± 0.03 0.03 ± 0.01 0.3 ± 0.1 8.2 ns
CYP9G5 4.0 ns 4.1 ± 1.3 1.0 ± 0.2 1.2 ± 0.1 1.2 ns CYP367B2 3.2 ns 3.4 ± 1.3 1.1 ± 0.2 1.3 ± 0.2 1.2 ns
CYP9A3 3.2 *** 34.0 ± 2.2 10.6 ± 0.6 14.8 ± 1.5 1.4 ns
CYP6AB9 3.1 *** 425.3 ± 44.5 138.9 ± 8.6 195.0 ± 20.7 1.4 ns CYP4S12 2.3 *** 10.2 ± 0.7 4.4 ± 0.9 2.9 ± 0.3 1.5 ns
CYP341B7 2.0 * 1.0 ± 0.1 0.5 ± 0.1 0.8 ± 0.2 1.5 ns
CYP6B6v2 1.7 ns 16.4 ± 5.1 9.9 ± 6.2 60.2 ± 22.9 6.1 ns CYP4G8 1.5 ns 2448.2 ± 393.2 1602.9 ± 148.0 1800.7 ± 250.9 1.1 ns
CYP6AE17 1.5 ns 514.8 ± 68.1 337.8 ± 48.5 232.5 ± 25.6 1.5 ns
CYP9A34 1.4 * 40.3 ± 3.9 28.1 ± 1.7 82.2 ± 17.1 2.9 ns CYP4S13 1.4 ns 4.3 ± 0.6 3.0 ± 0.8 4.1 ± 0.4 1.3 ns
CYP6AE14 1.4 * 42.8 ± 3.8 30.8 ± 1.7 19.6 ± 2.8 1.6 ns
CYP4M7v2 1.0 ns 26.9 ± 4.0 25.9 ± 1.1 41.1 ± 4.3 1.6 ns CYP306A1 1.0 ns 23.6 ± 5.4 22.8 ± 4.1 38.3 ± 4.5 1.7 ns
CYP4G26 1.0 ns 36.0 ± 7.9 36.4 ± 6.1 35.6 ± 4.3 1.0 ns
CYP6AB10 1.1 ns 13.1 ± 3.1 14.3 ± 7.2 26.3 ± 16.4 1.8 ns CYP4G9 1.1 ns 143.3 ± 25.0 158.0 ± 11.2 212.2 ± 21.3 1.3 ns
CYP4AU1 1.1 ns 4.1 ± 0.8 4.7 ± 0.7 4.6 ± 0.4 1.0 ns
CYP6AE16 1.2 ns 2.3 ± 0.2 2.7 ± 0.2 1.0 ± 0.1 2.7 ns CYP304F1 1.3 ns 0.1 ± 0.02 0.1 ± 0.02 0.04 ± 0.01 1.6 ns
CYP6B43 1.4 ns 7.1 ± 0.6 9.6 ± 2.3 7.4 ± 0.2 1.3 ns
CYP4S2 1.4 ns 0.1 ± 0.02 0.2 ± 0.02 0.3 ± 0.04 1.6 ns CYP9A23v3 1.6 ns 8.5 ± 1.7 13.6 ± 1.9 8.0 ± 1.2 1.7 ns
CYP9A12 1.7 ns 1.0 ± 0.1 1.7 ± 0.1 1.4 ± 0.1 1.2 ns CYP4L5 1.7 ** 256.5 ± 39.9 430.9 ± 23.9 315.6 ± 15.6 1.4 ns
CYP340J1 1.7 * 11.4 ± 2.5 19.6 ± 2.5 33.4 ± 8.1 1.7 ns
CYP6B8 2.0 ns 4.6 ± 0.6 9.1 ± 4.4 13.7 ± 4.8 1.5 ns CYP6AN1 2.1 *** 187.0 ± 18.0 389.5 ± 22.9 599.6 ± 134 1.5 ns
CYP333A1 2.4 *** 10.7 ± 0.4 25.4 ± 1.4 23.6 ± 1.0 1.1 ns
CYP305B1 2.6 * 24.5 ± 10.2 63.4 ± 12.4 12.0 ± 1.0 5.3 ns CYP9A15 2.6 *** 0.6 ± 0.1 1.6 ± 0.1 6.1 ± 2.0 3.8 ns
CYP4L11 2.7 *** 82.5 ± 6.2 223 ± 16.8 202.1 ± 11.7 1.1 ns
CYP321A5 2.8 * 308.3 ± 79.2 850.3 ± 194.3 421.6 ± 95.2 2.0 ns
CYP428A1 2.8 ** 6.0 ± 2.6 16.8 ± 1.5 19.9 ± 1.1 1.2 ns
CYP332A1 2.8 ** 65.7 ± 14.1 183.7 ± 32.7 104.4 ± 15.4 1.8 ns
CYP6AE12 2.9 *** 34.4 ± 2.1 98.5 ± 9.5 74.0 ± 11.0 1.3 ns CYP333B3 3.0 *** 0.4 ± 0.1 1.1 ± 0.1 2.0 ± 0.2 1.8 ns
CYP307A1 3.1 * 1.8 ± 0.5 5.4 ± 1.1 3.1 ± 0.6 1.8 ns
CYP6AE24 3.1 ** 260.0 ± 7.0 80.1 ± 12.8 109.5 ± 21.7 1.4 ns CYP354A3 3.6 *** 12.4 ± 1.1 45.0 ± 3.7 38.9 ± 3.0 1.2 ns
CYP4M6v2 3.8 ns 28.0 ± 18.1 107.3 ± 40.6 116.6 ± 13.4 4.2 ns
CYP6AE19 3.9 *** 1.3 ± 0.3 5.1 ± 0.6 24.0 ± 5.8 4.7 ns CYP9A14 5.3 * 4.1 ± 1.0 22.0 ± 5.0 14.9 ± 3.6 1.5 ns
CYP6AE11 6.0 *** 139.0 ± 36.8 831.1 ± 79.6 275.6 ± 39.0 3.0 ns
CYP4M10v2 10.2 ns 1.3 ± 0.4 13.6 ± 6.2 16.5 ± 11.1 1.2 ns CYP6B2v3 22.2 *** 14.8 ± 1.9 328.4 ± 49.2 146.5 ± 29.0 2.2 ns
CYP6AE23 nd 8.6 ± 1.2 31.3 ± 8.5 3.7 ns CYP6AE20v2 nd 0.2 ± 0.03 0.3 ± 0.1 1.6 ns
CYP6AE15v2 nd 7.2 ± 0.5 10 ± 0.9 1.4 ns
CYP9A17 nd 269.6 ± 22.4 191.1 ± 52.8 1.4 ns CYP302A1 nd 0.02 ± 0.02 0.01 ± 0.01 1.7 ns
CYP324A1 nd 47.5 ± 12.9 13.4 ± 4.5 3.5 ns
CYP321B1 nd 34.8 ± 9.7 0.5 ± 0.2 73.2 *
CYP340K1 nd nd nd
10
CYP367A8 nd nd nd
11
Table S5. 1H NMR data (500 MHz, MeOH-d4) of 4'-hydroxy-α-cypermethrin and the
parent compound, α-cypermethrin
Position -Cypermethrin 4'-Hydroxy--cypermethrin
H (J, Hz) H (J, Hz)
3-(2,2-Dichlorovinyl)-2,2-dimethylcylopropane carboxylate
1 2.02 (1H, d, 8.3) 2.02 (1H, d, 8.3)
3 2.19 (1H, dd, 8.7, 8.3) 2.20 (1H, dd, 8.7, 8.3)
1'' 6.22 (1H, d, 8.7) 6.22 (1H, d, 8.7)
2-CH3 1.25 (3H, s) 1.25 (3H, s)
2-CH3 1.18 (3H, s) 1.17 (3H, s)
-Cyanobenzyl moiety
α 6.55 (1H, s) 6.54 (1H, s)
2 7.13 (1H, br s) 7.02 (1H, br s)
4 7.08 (1H, dd, 8.0, 2.4) 6.98 (1H, dd, 8.0, 2.4)
5 7.56 (1H, dd, 8.0, 7.8) 7.39 (1H, dd, 8.0, 7.8)
6 7.30 (1H, br d, 7.8) 7.20 (1H, br d, 7.8)
3-Aryloxy ring
2'/6' 7.03 (2H, d, 8.2) 6.89 (2H, d-like, 8.9)
3'/5' 7.39 (2H, dd, 8.2, 7.7) 6.81 (2H, d-like, 8.9)
4' 7.17 (1H, t, 7.7)
12
Table S6. MIQE-précis: Minimum information for quantitative real-time PCR
Sample/Template Details Check
Source larvae, 3 per biological rep, x 3 biological reps yes
Method of preservation liquid nitrogen, storage at -80 °C yes
Storage time (if appropriate) < 6 months yes
Handling fresh or frozen yes
Extraction method TRIzol reagent yes
RNA: DNA-free DNaseI treatment, intron-spanning primers yes
Concentration Nanodrop spectrophotometer yes
RNA: integrity Agilent RNA 6000 Nano Kit yes
Inhibition-free dilution series yes
Assay optimisation/validation
Accession number Table S3 yes
Amplicon details 80 -168 bp yes
Primer sequence Table S3 yes
Probe sequence no probe, SYBR green yes
In silico BLAST, Primer3 yes
empirical Tm = 60 yes
Priming conditions oligo-dT, 3xRT (1%-10% deviation) yes
PCR efficiency not performed no
Linear dynamic range yes yes
Limits of detection 0.01 copies per 1000 molecules reference gene yes
Intra-assay variation standard errors in Table S4 yes
RT/PCR
Protocols M&M section 2.6 yes
Reagents M&M section 2.6 yes
Duplicate RT 3xRT (1%-10% deviation) yes
NTC Cq > 40, melt curves vs bona fide samples yes
NAC no probe, SYBR green yes
Positive control inter-run calibrators yes
Data analysis
Specialist software MxPro 4.0 QPCR Software (Agilent); qBase yes
Statistical justification biological replicates, heteroscedastic t-tests yes
Transparent, validated
normalisation eIF4A yes