7/31/2019 Met the Test and Passed Readily for the Internet
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/met-the-test-and-passed-readily-for-the-internet 1/12
Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH
Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of MedicineSpokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm
May 5, 2012
The Defender of The Faith, Queen of England/the british monarchy
Buckingham PalaceLondon SW1A 1AA
ENGLAND
RE: I met your tests and passed them readily with Fundamental Justice still being withheld by the
Judge Advocate General (Canada)
To Everyone:
1 The provided copy of the April 2, 2012 email on behalf of The Province of British
Columbia/The Confederation of Canada and its consenting to the reality that GREAT HARM was
done to me by order of the rule of law principle and those devoted to this “devil’s advocacy” and to
which I have responded with honesty and forthrightness AFFIRMS my credentials as Spokesperson
for THE FREE Society of Equals and The Mandate of Heaven.
2 In decades past, such individuals would have ready access to the reigning monarch
and the advice would be accepted without question because such individuals only speak when
directed by God and not at any monarch’s insistence or questioning.
3 This morning, the final and only question that can be posed of all persons was
presented to me. Jesus Christ, The Son of God, in Luke 16:13 presented words which can now be
used to formulate the most dominating of all questions.
4 In His Words, Jesus Christ, presented the concept that all mankind are “servants” or
born to serve someone or something.
Therefore, the natural question for all to answer is:
“Whom or what do you serve?”
5 Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms presented 2 distinct and separate
3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1 1
7/31/2019 Met the Test and Passed Readily for the Internet
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/met-the-test-and-passed-readily-for-the-internet 2/12
Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH
Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of MedicineSpokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm
possibilities for the servitude of the people: The Supremacy of God or Ruling through the letter of
the law.
6 The actions and deeds of former premiers Gordon Campbell, Ralph Klein, Ed
Stelmach, Mike Harris as well as Prime Minister Stephen Harper dictate clearly that they are/were
devoted to the rule of law principle where the elected bodies are superior to God!
7 My words and actions affirm that I am devoted to The Truth/The Holy Spirit
and, therefore, The Supremacy of God . I also now accept that, in order to transition back to the
point where everyone will be loyal to The Supremacy of God , the rule of law principle can exist but
where no decision/opinion by a judge or adjudicator or administrator is valid unless the pure
fact Truth known to them, just as It should be to others, will define the decision READILY
because the pure facts and their Truth are The Holy Spirit which will produce its own
understanding of The Universe, both known and unknown. When such evidence is not forthcoming,
then, there can be no decision against the disenfranchised people or any such decision is MOOT.
8 Scientific Logic demanded and still demands that simple Truth based upon the pure
facts was to be the definer of the legitimacy of thought going forward.
9 The system knew this and has circumvented the pure fact Truth through the creation
of new administrative bodies/quasi-judicial entities that only produce lies that also apply to the law
courts but not The Court of Fundamental Justice where these lies, according to the omitted pure fact
Truth/BAD FAITH, are dismissed and The Holy Spirit’s Fundamental Justice MUST be upheld and
is binding on all thought going forward—the world was always round!
10 So, in my case, the law courts would have been forced to confine its thoughts to the
corrupt decision provided by the government agents just like all WCB personnel were bound to the
corruption of the elected bodies having taken over administrative decision making where the pure
fact Truth and knowing how to circumvent it was all that the quasi-judicial bodies as agents of the
governments know and actively told to do through the rule of law principle.
3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1 2
7/31/2019 Met the Test and Passed Readily for the Internet
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/met-the-test-and-passed-readily-for-the-internet 3/12
Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH
Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of MedicineSpokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm
11 In my specific case, the governments’ knew and still know that my job injuries are
ongoing today but if and only if the physical examination of my right elbow and the accompanying
diagnosis from June 1989 are upheld as the pure fact Truth that it is and always was. According to
not just Exhibit “K” on The Petition File No. PO-001 with The Defender of The
Faith but now the April 2, 2012 email of consent – provided at the end of the mandatory 3 week
review period of my Form 34s, Requisitions of an Originating Fundamental Justice (Peremptory)
Order , the system finally acknowledge that it knowingly bore false witness to the events on my
job injuries (as well as other current corruption) thereby outright depriving me and numerous others
of the proper objective diagnosis of my job injuries and the demand of having to reverse these
injuries as well as eliminate future cases of overuse syndrome of the forearm/hand and shoulder -
security of person.
12 It is now cut-and-dried that “devil’s advocacy”/“reverse onus” was applied to me by
order of the rule of law for the purpose that I would have to represent the God’s Honest Truth to The
Court of Fundamental Justice as I have been attempting to do since June 2007 after the corruption
of the pure facts of my WCB file and its consequences for Everyone was fully made known to me.
13 Leah Greathead, according to the April 2, 2012 email, is an agent of The
Confederation of Canada—not just the province of british columbia but all provinces as
Fundamental Justice is the Great Unifier and applies Everywhere equally. With the provincial
government of British Columbia providing consent to the March 4, 16, 22 and 26, 2012 emails and
their attachments, meaning that there is no impediment to complying with the provided contracts,
why has Leah Greathead and The Court of Fundamental Justice refused to comply with
Fundamental Justice and sign and fulfill the contracts thereby allowing me to fulfill my destiny in
servitude to God Almighty and Jesus Christ?
14 Since April 17, 1982, the system has imposed, quietly, “devil’s advocacy” as a test
to see if The Comforter is here. Well, I can assure you, that reality is beyond question now!
3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1 3
7/31/2019 Met the Test and Passed Readily for the Internet
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/met-the-test-and-passed-readily-for-the-internet 4/12
Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH
Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of MedicineSpokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm
15 I passed your tests and produced The Supremacy of God Due Corrective Process
document where the new set of laws will have to have a Fundamental Justice Dictate in order keep
any and all given schemes which includes democracy; or else the law for the scheme and the
resulting scheme is dismissed once and for all and forevermore across The New British Empire.
16 Yes, it is going to take me 6 years not only to recover from my ongoing job injuries
but also to plant the seed of The Supremacy of God back in everyone’s minds.
17 By having been made loyal to mammon through the rule of law principle, many will
have to amend their ways because there is only one lifestyle for all mankind and what mankind has
wrought under democracy and the rule of law principle has DEFILED the natural order of this
planet and universe which God created— the prophecy of Luke 16:17 fulfilled.
18 S. 52(1) and s. 7 along with s. 24 (1) of Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms
DEMAND loyalty and devotion to The Principles of Fundamental Justice for all including the
elected bodies and the ultimate set of the rules of law. By creating and ordering the quasi-judicial
tribunals to play “devil’s advocate”, the entire society of Canada was destroyed since 1982 so that
God would send his final agent, prophet— The Comforter .
19 God has done as demanded by the corruption of the administrative decision making
imposed by the Confederation of Canada: the system that mankind created is meaningless and, as
been demonstrated numerous times, will fail and then needs to be cradled and nurtured by the
administration. Now, though, the system is dead and on life support—stagflation has set in on the
global economy as the final consequence of this corruption/moral hazard.
20 Thus, the devotion to mammon and its consequences are exposed and demands that
everyone including Christians now be asked:
“Whom or what do you serve?”
3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1 4
7/31/2019 Met the Test and Passed Readily for the Internet
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/met-the-test-and-passed-readily-for-the-internet 5/12
Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH
Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of MedicineSpokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm
21 Everyone KNOWS where my loyalty lies.
22 But, clearly, there is a problem with The Court of Fundamental Justice because there
has been no contact with me from Leah Greathead concerning finalizing everything according to the
rules of the current system and its imposed contracts.
23 I have not done anything corrupt but, for some strange reason, the corrective approach
to the corruption remains to be brought to bear in this matter.
24 There is not doubt as to the ultimate outcome for democracy and the rule of law
principle without correction by The Holy Spirit within 6 years but there is also no doubt of the
current unreasonable outcome of DENIAL of The Truth and the GREAT HARM imposed upon me
by the corrupt policies of today while this GREAT HARM needs to be removed so as to allow me
my God Given Right to Fundamental Justice, finally, and my starting down the path towards my cure
and full recovery of my mature, healthy and kinetic human body.
25 The real problem for the rule of law principle in Canada is that it abolished
Everyone’s right to have their person’s injuries diagnosed PROPERLY and then cured when possible
and across all time while using this information to change work standards!
26 When Everyone finds out about this reality and how it DENIES Everyone their God
Given Legal Rights, there is going to be a lot of problems for the current system and those devoted
to abusing of the rule of law principle to fulfill their twisted agendas and how pure facts and its
evidence has been withheld from all thought so as to continue democracy all the while knowing full
well that democracy can only exist through the dismissal of The Supremacy of God and His Holy
Spirit concerning administrative decision making.
27 I am sick and tired of the run around that has arisen from the administrations’
DENIAL of not just Everyone’s Legal Rights but also the reality of Fundamental Justice where
simple correctness/incorrectness is grounds for dismissal of not just the corrupt administrative
decision but also the advisors to The Monarchy as has happened in the past and by The Defender of
3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1 5
7/31/2019 Met the Test and Passed Readily for the Internet
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/met-the-test-and-passed-readily-for-the-internet 6/12
Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH
Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of MedicineSpokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm
The Faith where The Holy Spirit supports or repudiates the current advisors or the demand for their
being replaced with the proper Fundamental Justice Due Process.
28 With all the pure fact evidence RESOUNDINGLY SCREAMING that injustice has
been imposed on me through an administrative web of lies, deceit and deception and, on April 2,
2012, the administration consented to this Truth, why is Leah Greathead, the agent of the province
of British Columbia at The Court of Fundamental Justice, STILL refusing to comply with The
Principles of Fundamental Justice and Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms and Constitution
because it has been thoroughly proven that, indeed, a monumental GREAT HARM befell me that
has originated from the rule of law principle and its reliance on The Supremacy of God Due
Corrective Process as the only means to correct this mess?
29 I did as was required by The Supremacy of God Due Corrective Process and made
the corruption known to The Judge Advocate General (Canada), the Confederation has relied by
admitting to its corruption (provided consent to the Form 34s, Requisitions for Originating
Fundamental Justice (Peremptory) Orders) and, yet, The Court of Fundamental Justice has now
made itself an impediment to the only appropriate and JUST REMEDY in the circumstances.
30 So, what is the purpose of The Court of Fundamental Justice in my circumstances
and nothing gets done: wrong is wrong while right is right, correct?
In The Name of Jesus Christ,
(signed copy sent and received by Buckingham Palace and copy sent to the Judge Advocate General CA)
Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH
Author of The Treatise on The Petition to the Court Due Legal ProcessGalileo II/Spokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE SOCIETY Founder of the Unified College of Medicine
Petitioner on File No. PO-001 with The Defender of The Faith
3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1 6
7/31/2019 Met the Test and Passed Readily for the Internet
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/met-the-test-and-passed-readily-for-the-internet 7/12
Mr. E. J. Krass, SoH
Just Call Me - Galileo II/Founder of the Unified College of MedicineSpokesperson for THE TRUTH BASED FREE Society and Its Realm
PS The world has always been round, yet, in spite of the evidence many who are educated still don’t
know that the world is indeed round and any contention of flatness is a lie. I saw just how bad
the education system is in Los Angeles on Jay Leno’s Jaywalking All-stars a few years back
where the 2 youths in post-secondary education actually still believed that the world was flat
regardless of the accumulated objective evidence and it not being known to them, like the
pictures of the earth from the moon.
There is absolutely no difference between this frightening reality and the fact that tennis
elbow/lateral epicondylitis since the 1970's was firmly established objectively to be a serious and
significant physiological injury rather than the medical lie where the pain is not speaking and is
just your mind playing games with you so just work through it.
Countless times beyond my studies among the medical community have affirmed objectively that
lateral epicondylitis is due to the abnormal mental forced contraction of the mislabeled pronator
teres muscle whose sole responsibility is to contradict the motion of the radius placed upon it bycontraction of the biceps muscles, i.e. to return the bicipital tuberosity to where it resides on top
of the ulna.
In spite of all the evidence found in the medical journals since 2003, the administration is still
not allowing The Truth to be known to the world just so that mammon can be maintained as the
expense of Everyone’s Legal Rights especially those defined by The Principles of Fundamental
Justice where wrong is wrong and right supplants all that is wrong.
PPS After reflecting on these matters and who has the authority to withhold Fundamental Justice
at this point in time (with a consent email for the Confederation of Canada, i.e. admission of
checkmate) and the answer is Queen Elizabeth II. Leah Greathead and the Judge Advocate
General get their orders from the reigning Monarch who is Queen Elizabeth II which bydeduction and definition makes Queen Elizabeth II the current “devil’s advocate” just as Henry
VIII was to Sir Thomas More and his being loyal to God first and the king second or King
Edward I of England to his serfs under Quo Warranto where nobody has any God Given Rights
except if The Monarch accepts this/permits it. Without this acceptance, under Quo Warranto,
nobody has any God Given Legal Rights as established by The Magna Carta and s. 7 of
Canada’s Charter of Rights and Freedoms which automatically dismisses Canada’s Charter
of Rights and Freedoms along with The Supremacy of God and which has been fully
established with The Supremacy of God Due Corrective Process that is now necessary because
the rule of law principle is being held as “divine” and “beyond reproach”.
As already presented, The Supremacy of God Due Corrective Process provides for utter cruel
and harsh treatment of all persons throughout the realms just as is ONGOING in my casewhere, although there is no opposition to finally Doing Right in my matters, Queen Elizabeth
has withheld her approval of compensation for my suffrage through this GREAT HARM
thereby extending it—NOT ending it.
I can make this deduction known without fear of reprisal because I’m already dead inside from
all this abuse and DENIAL of the authority of The Holy Spirit!
3929 Woodell Road, WESTBANK BC V4T 1E1 7
7/31/2019 Met the Test and Passed Readily for the Internet
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/met-the-test-and-passed-readily-for-the-internet 8/12
From: "AG LSB CSD Mail AG:EX" <[email protected]>Date: Monday, April 02, 2012 4:17 PMTo: <[email protected]>Subject: Your emails of March 4, 16, 22 and 26, 2012
Page 1 of 1
4/4/2012
Ernst Krass
Email: [email protected]
Your emails dated March 16, 22 and 26, 2012, addressed to the Minister of Justice andAttorney General, have been forwarded to me for response. I have also received a copy ofyour March 4, 2012 email to the Premier, and I am responding on behalf of both the Premierand the Minister of Justice and Attorney General.
I note your views and concerns regarding a legal action that you have started against theGovernment of British Columbia. It would not be appropriate for the Minister of Justice andAttorney General to comment on a matter that is presently before the court.
Please send any further communications regarding this matter to Leah Greathead, a lawyer inthe Legal Services Branch who has conduct of this matter for the Province. She can bereached at the following address:
Leah GreatheadBarrister and SolicitorMinistry of Attorney GeneralLegal Services BranchPO Box 9280 Stn Prov GovtVictoria BC V8W 9J7
Sincerely,
Richard J. M. Fyfe, Q.C.Assistant Deputy Attorney General
pc: The Honourable Christy ClarkLeah Greathead
7/31/2019 Met the Test and Passed Readily for the Internet
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/met-the-test-and-passed-readily-for-the-internet 9/12
Donald Martin Appellant
v.
Workers' Compensation Board of Nova Scotia and
Attorney General of Nova Scotia Respondents
and
Nova Scotia Workers' Compensation Appeals Tribunal,
Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups,
Canadian Labour Congress,Attorney General of Ontario,
Attorney General of British Columbia and
Workers' Compensation Board of Alberta Interveners
and between
Ruth A. Laseur Appellant
v.
Workers' Compensation Board of Nova Scotia and
Attorney General of Nova Scotia Respondents
and
Nova Scotia Workers' Compensation Appeals Tribunal,
Ontario Network of Injured Workers Groups,
Canadian Labour Congress,
Attorney General of Ontario,Attorney General of British Columbia andWorkers' Compensation Board of Alberta Interveners
Indexed as: Nova Scotia (Workers' Compensation Board) v. Martin; Nova Scotia (Workers'
Compensation Board) v. Laseur
Neutral citation: 2003 SCC 54.
File Nos.: 28372, 28370.
2002: December 9; 2003: October 3.
Present: McLachlin C.J. and Gonthier, Iacobucci, Major, Bastarache, Binnie, Arbour, LeBel and
Deschamps JJ.
ON APPEAL FROM THE COURT OF APPEAL FOR NOVA SCOTIA
1
Exhibit "AA"
7/31/2019 Met the Test and Passed Readily for the Internet
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/met-the-test-and-passed-readily-for-the-internet 10/12
pain provisions did not demean the human dignity of the claimants and thus did not violate s.
15(1) of the Charter.
Held: The appeals should be allowed. Section 10B of the Act and the Regulations in their
entirety infringe s. 15(1) of the Charter and the infringement is not justified under s. 1. The
challenged provisions are of no force or effect by operation of s. 52(1) of the Constitution Act,
1982. The general declaration of invalidity is postponed for six months from the date of this judgment. In M's case, the decision rendered by the Appeals Tribunal is reinstated. L's case is
returned to the Board.
The Constitution is the supreme law of Canada and, by virtue of s. 52(1) of the Constitution
Act, 1982, the question of constitutional validity inheres in every legislative enactment. From this principle of constitutional supremacy flows, as a practical corollary, the idea that Canadians
should be entitled to assert the rights and freedoms that the Constitution guarantees them in the
most accessible forum available, without the need for parallel proceedings before the courts. To
allow an administrative tribunal to decide Charter issues does not undermine the role of the courts
as final arbiters of constitutionality in Canada. Administrative tribunal decisions based on the
Charter are subject to judicial review on a correctness standard. In addition, the constitutional
remedies available to administrative tribunals are limited and do not include general declarationsof invalidity. A determination by a tribunal that a provision of its enabling statute is invalid
pursuant to the Charter is not binding on future decision-makers, within or outside the tribunal's
administrative scheme. Only by obtaining a formal declaration of invalidity by a court can alitigant establish the general invalidity of a legislative provision for all future cases.
The Court of Appeal erred in concluding that the Appeals Tribunal did not have jurisdiction to
consider the constitutionality of the challenged provisions of the Act and the Regulations.
Administrative tribunals which have jurisdiction, explicit or implied, to decide questions of law
arising under a legislative provision are presumed to have concomitant jurisdiction to decide the
constitutional validity of that provision. In applying this approach, there is no need to draw any
distinction between "general" and "limited" questions of law. Explicit jurisdiction must be found
in the terms of the statutory grant of authority. Implied jurisdiction must be discerned by lookingat the statute as a whole. Relevant factors will include the statutory mandate of the tribunal inissue and whether deciding questions of law is necessary to fulfilling this mandate effectively; the
interaction of the tribunal in question with other elements of the administrative system; whether
the tribunal is adjudicative in nature; and practical considerations, including the tribunal's
capacity to consider questions of law. Practical considerations, however, cannot override a
clear implication from the statute itself. The party alleging that the tribunal lacks
jurisdiction to apply the Charter may rebut the presumption by pointing to an explicit
withdrawal of authority to consider the Charter; or by convincing the court that an
examination of the statutory scheme clearly leads to the conclusion that the legislature
intended to exclude the Charter (or a category of questions that would include the Charter,
such as constitutional questions generally) from the scope of the questions of law to be
addressed by the tribunal. Such an implication should generally arise from the statute itself,rather than from external considerations. To the extent that Cooper v. Canada (Human Rights
Commission), [1996] 3 S.C.R. 854, is inconsistent with this approach, it should no longer be
relied upon.
The Appeals Tribunal could properly consider and decide the Charter issue raised in this case.
The legislature expressly conferred on the Appeals Tribunal the authority to decide questions of
3
7/31/2019 Met the Test and Passed Readily for the Internet
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/met-the-test-and-passed-readily-for-the-internet 11/12
Freedoms?
2 If the answer to question # 1 is yes, does such infringement constitute a reasonable limit
prescribed by law and demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society pursuant to s. 1 of
the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
V. Analysis
A. Jurisdiction of the Appeals Tribunal to Apply the Charter
1. The Policy Adopted by this Court in the Trilogy
27 This Court has examined the jurisdiction of administrative tribunals to consider the
constitutional validity of a provision of their enabling statute in Douglas College, supra, Cuddy
Chicks, supra, and Tétreault-Gadoury, supra (together, the "trilogy"). On each occasion, the Court
emphasized the strong reasons, of principle as well as policy, for allowing administrative
tribunals to make such determinations and to refuse to apply a challenged provision found to
violate the Constitution.
28 First, and most importantly, the Constitution is, under s. 52(1) of the Constitution Act,
1982, "the supreme law of Canada, and any law that is inconsistent with the provisions of the
Constitution is, to the extent of the inconsistency, of no force or effect". The invalidity of alegislative provision inconsistent with the Charter does not arise from the fact of its being
declared unconstitutional by a court, but from the operation of s. 52(1). Thus, in principle, such a
provision is invalid from the moment it is enacted, and a judicial declaration to this effect is but
one remedy amongst others to protect those whom it adversely affects. In that sense, by virtue of
s. 52(1), the question of constitutional validity inheres in every legislative enactment. Courts may
not apply invalid laws, and the same obligation applies to every level and branch of government,
including the administrative organs of the state. Obviously, it cannot be the case that every
government official has to consider and decide for herself the constitutional validity of every
provision she is called upon to apply. If, however, she is endowed with the power to consider questions of law relating to a provision, that power will normally extend to assessing theconstitutional validity of that provision. This is because the consistency of a provision with the
Constitution is a question of law arising under that provision. It is, indeed, the most fundamental
question of law one could conceive, as it will determine whether the enactment is in fact valid
law, and thus whether it ought to be interpreted and applied as such or disregarded.
29 From this principle of constitutional supremacy also flows, as a practical corollary, the idea
that Canadians should be entitled to assert the rights and freedoms that the Constitution
guarantees them in the most accessible forum available, without the need for parallel proceedings
before the courts: see Douglas College, supra, at pp. 603-604. In La Forest J.'s words, "there
cannot be a Constitution for arbitrators and another for the courts" (Douglas College, supra, at p.
597) This accessibility concern is particularly pressing given that many administrative tribunalshave exclusive initial jurisdiction over disputes relating to their enabling legislation, so that
forcing litigants to refer Charter issues to the courts would result in costly and time-consuming
bifurcation of proceedings. As McLachlin J. (as she then was) stated in her dissent in Cooper,supra, at para. 70:
15
D FAITH/ vil's
vocacy"
7/31/2019 Met the Test and Passed Readily for the Internet
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/met-the-test-and-passed-readily-for-the-internet 12/12
119 As the appellants point out, the policies that used to provide for individualized assessment
of impairment in chronic pain cases have been repealed following the enactment of the
challenged provisions of the Act and the FPR Regulations. Therefore, giving immediate effect to
the declaration of invalidity of these provisions could result in prejudice to injured workers
affected by chronic pain, as the Board would then have no specific policies or provisions to rely
on in such cases. While some default or residuary provisions of the Act and of the regulations as
well as policies of the Board might apply, the results would likely be inconsistent, given theconsiderable discretion which would be left to the Board in chronic pain cases. The default rules
might even prevent certain chronic pain sufferers from receiving any benefits, as was the case for
Ms. Laseur. Allowing the challenged provisions to remain in force for a limited period of time
would preserve the limited benefits of the current program until an appropriate legislative
response to chronic pain can be implemented. Therefore, as the appellants requested, it isreasonable to postpone the general declaration of invalidity for six months from the date of this
judgment: see Schachter, supra.
120 This postponement, of course, does not affect the appellants' cases. Mr. Martin is clearly
entitled to the benefits he has been claiming, as the challenged provisions stood as the only
obstacle to his claims. I would thus reinstate the judgment rendered by the Appeals Tribunal in
the Martin case on January 31, 2000.
121 The Appeals Tribunal, however, refused to grant permanent impairment benefits to Ms.
Laseur because she did not challenge the constitutionality of the applicable guidelines, whichattributed a permanent impairment rating of 0% to her injuries. In my view, it is appropriate to
return Ms. Laseur's case to the Board for reconsideration on the basis of the subsisting provisions
of the Act and the applicable regulations and policies. I note that, if Ms. Laseur elects to raise the
constitutionality of the permanent impairment guidelines, the Board will be obliged to consider
and decide the issue in accordance with the present reasons.
122 I would answer the constitutional questions as follows:
1 Do s. 10B of the Workers' Compensation Act, S.N.S. 1994-95, c. 10, as amended, and theFunctional Restoration (Multi-Faceted Pain Services) Program Regulations, N.S. Reg. 57/96infringe the equality rights guaranteed by s. 15(1) of the Canadian Charter of Rights and
Freedoms?
Yes.
2 If the answer to question # 1 is yes, does such infringement constitute a reasonable limit
prescribed by law and demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society pursuant to s. 1 of
the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms?
No.
ANNEX: RELEVANT LEGISLATION
Workers' Compensation Act, S.N.S. 1994-95, c. 10
10A In this Act, "chronic pain" means pain
41
DENIAL of Everyone's God Given LEGAL Rightsapplies to THE FREE Society of Equals and The
Supremacy of God which is the sole appropriateand JUST standard! Everything else is fictionused TO DENY The Truth/The Holy Spirit.
s. 24 (1) of The Charter presents bothinfringement and DENIAL that nobodybut me knows applies to all provisionsof all enactments and also themandates of all schemes/agencieswith DENIAL being the only legitimate
t d d f t !