Registered Charity Number 207890
Accepted Manuscript
This is an Accepted Manuscript, which has been through the RSC Publishing peer review process and has been accepted for publication.
Accepted Manuscripts are published online shortly after acceptance, which is prior to technical editing, formatting and proof reading. This free service from RSC Publishing allows authors to make their results available to the community, in citable form, before publication of the edited article. This Accepted Manuscript will be replaced by the edited and formatted Advance Article as soon as this is available.
To cite this manuscript please use its permanent Digital Object Identifier (DOI®), which is identical for all formats of publication.
More information about Accepted Manuscripts can be found in the Information for Authors.
Please note that technical editing may introduce minor changes to the text and/or graphics contained in the manuscript submitted by the author(s) which may alter content, and that the standard Terms & Conditions and the ethical guidelines that apply to the journal are still applicable. In no event shall the RSC be held responsible for any errors or omissions in these Accepted Manuscript manuscripts or any consequences arising from the use of any information contained in them.
www.rsc.org/obc
ISSN 1477-0520
Organic &BiomolecularChemistry
1477-0520(2010)8:3;1-H
FULL PAPER Shuji Ikeda et al.Hybridization-sensitive fluorescent DNA probe with self-avoidance ability
PERSPECTIVELaurel K. Mydock and Alexei V. DemchenkoMechanism of chemical O-glycosylation: from early studies to recent discoveries
www.rsc.org/obc Volume 8 | Number 3 | 7 February 2010 | Pages 481–716
Organic &BiomolecularChemistry
View Article OnlineView Journal
1
Low-molecular-weight gelators consisting of hybrid
cyclobutane-based peptides
Sergi Celis,a Pau Nolis,
b Ona Illa,
a Vicenç Branchadell
a and Rosa M.
Ortuño*a
a Departament de Química, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, 08193 Cerdanyola del
Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
b Servei de Ressonància Magnètica Nuclear, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona,
08193 Cerdanyola del Vallès, Barcelona, Spain
Electronic supplementary information (ESI) available: Appearance of gels in the
different solvents, IR data, computational calculations on an alternative aggregation
pattern for 1, and NMR details on the study of gelation of 1.
Page 1 of 24 Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
2
Abstract
Some hybrid tetrapeptides consisting of (1R,2S)-2-aminocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid
and glycine, β-alanine, or γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA) joined in alternation,
compounds 1-3 respectively, have been investigated to gain information on the non-
covalent interactions responsible for their self-assembly to form ordered aggregates, as
well as on parameters such as their morphology and size. All three peptides formed nice
gels in many organic solvents and significant difference in their behaviour was not
observed. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) and circular dichroism (CD) pointed
out that peptide 1, which contains the shortest C2 linear residue, presented the most
defined fibril network and afforded nanoscale helical aggregates. Tetrapeptide 3, with
C4 linear residues in its structure, also showed bundles of fibres whereas a
homogeneous spherulitic network was observed for tetrapeptide 2, with a C3 spacer
between cyclobutane residues. Computational calculations for 1 allowed to model the
self-assembly of the molecules and suggested a head-to-head arrangement to give
helical structures corresponding to hydrogen-bonded single chains. These features were
corroborated by a high-resolution NMR spectroscopy study of the dynamics of the
gelation process in toluene-d8 which evidenced that molecules self-assemble to afford
ordered aggregates with a supramolecular chirality.
Page 2 of 24Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
3
Introduction
In the last few years there has been a growing interest in the design of molecules that
are able to self-assemble in a predictable manner. These systems offer the perspective of
modulating the properties of the resulting materials by a precise design of their
molecular structures. The progress in this area has been directed from the fundamental
scientific curiosity but also from the numerous applications that can be attributed to
these hierarchically assembled aggregates. Particular examples are gels, which are
materials that nowadays have multiple applications in the fields of cosmetics, lubricants,
and food industry, amongst many others.1 Recently, in the field of biomedicine,
molecular gels that respond to different stimuli have been developed to generate
modular materials1a that can be used, for example, in controlled drug delivery2 or in
tissue regeneration3 and that present better biocompatibility indexes than classical
materials. In addition, nanometric fibrillar conductor gels have been developed and
these are of special importance in molecular electronics.4 Furthermore, these materials
can derive in new catalysts able to carry out processes under milder energetic conditions
and in a faster and more selective manner.5 Another important aspect is the introduction
of chirality in the structure of the molecules that self-assemble and generate gels,
conferring these materials with an extra value.6 Of special interest are peptide-based
gels.7 Many of them are classified as low-molecular-weight gelators (LMWGs) and
consist of short peptides or peptidomimetics.8 Many are formed by oligomers generated
from natural amino acids, especially dipeptides, which mainly form hydrogels.9 These
materials have found main applications for the production of functional biological
materials.10 In the recent years, efforts to develop LMWGs based on peptidomimetics
Page 3 of 24 Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
4
have been investigated to accomplish the design and preparation of new organogelators
with tuned properties. For instance, bolaamphiphilic gelators have been prepared and,
among them, some ambidextrous gelators are capable of forming gels in organic
solvents and in water.11
Our group has a broad experience in the synthesis and structural studies of
designed peptides based on optically active 2-aminocyclobutane-1-carboxylic acid
derivatives.12-14 Their conformational bias in solution has been investigated pointing out
the relationship between the preferred folding-type and the stereochemistry of the
monomeric units.15 Most of these molecules are prone to self-assemble producing nano-
sized fibres and some of them gelate in various organic solvents (Fig. 1).12,14,16
Fig. 1 Some polycylobutane β-peptides forming organogels
Self-assembly of chiral trans-cyclobutane-containing β-dipeptides into ordered
aggregates was investigated by using several experimental techniques and
computational calculations. The obtained results allowed us to characterize the
assemblies and to present a model for self-assembling that suggested molecular
Page 4 of 24Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
5
arrangements to give helical structures corresponding to hydrogen-bonded single-
chains. These, in turn, interacted with one another to afford bundles. Their significant
geometry obtained computationally fitted well to the main peaks observed in wide-angle
X-ray diffraction spectra of the aggregates in the solid state.16
Very recently, the synthesis and conformational study in solution of a family of
hybrid peptides was achieved. These compounds present cyclobutane β-amino acids and
linear residues such as glycine, β-alanine and γ–amino butyric acid (GABA), 1-3
respectively, joined in alternation (Fig. 2). Results from that study account for the
spacer length effect on folding and show that conformational preference for these hybrid
peptides can be tuned from β-sheet-like folding for those containing a C2 or C4 linear
segment to a helical folding for those with a C3 spacer between cyclobutane units.17
Compound 4 was also prepared and studied to verify the influence of the terminal ester
group in the observed folding with peptide 3.
Fig. 2 Structure of cyclobutane-based hybrid peptides subjected to study
In this paper we describe the gelation behaviour of molecules 1-3 in different
organic solvents. Compound 4 has also been considered to investigate the possible
effect of the lipophilic alkyl chain in the gelation capability of this type of products. For
all of them, their properties such as morphology, size and type of supramolecular
Page 5 of 24 Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
6
arrangement in gels was analyzed by using several techniques including scanning
electron microscopy (SEM), circular dichroism (CD) and IR spectroscopy. For gels
produced from α,β-tetrapeptide 1 in toluene, the self-assembly of the molecules has
been modelled suggesting a helical arrangement of the single chains produced. All these
results are in good accordance with high-resolution NMR experiments that, in addition
to studying the dynamics of the sol-gel process, pointed out the chiral recognition of the
prochiral linear segments during aggregation.
Results and discussion
The synthesis, full characterization and secondary structure in solution of cyclobutane-
based hybrid peptides 1-4 (Fig. 2) has been described in reference 17.
1. Gelation studies
Gelation capability was tested for compounds 1-4 in several solvents with
different dielectric constants. Results are summarized in Table 1. Very nice gels were
obtained in toluene in a 7-12 mM minimum-gel-concentration (mgc) range; at lower
concentration as shorter is the linear spacer for 1-3. This concentration compares well
with the mgc values reported for other tetrapeptides with good gelation properties.18
Higher concentration, but in a similar range in most cases, was required to gelate ethyl
acetate, acetonitrile and acetone. For these solvents, compound 4 afforded gels at lower
concentration than tetrapeptides 1–3, which were more soluble, showing thus the
influence of the lipophilic C6-alkyl chain. None of these compounds neither was soluble
in water nor was able to form hydrogels. In contrast, nice gels were obtained from iso-
propanol but they disappeared when some water was added. Tetrapeptides 1-3 formed
Page 6 of 24Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
7
gels in methanol and ethanol at rather high concentrations whereas compound 4 was
very soluble. In the other solvents, behaviour of compounds 1-4 is quite similar
although compound 4 requires lower mgc in most cases pointing out, again, the role of
the alkyl chain. They are insoluble in pentane and diethyl ether and very soluble in
chloroform, tetrapeptide 1 being the only able to form a gel in this solvent at mgc = 26
mM. (See the ESI for appearance of these gels in the different solvents).
Table 1. Gelation behaviour of compounds 1-4 in common solvents.a
Solvent and minimum gel concentrationb,c
Pentane
Toluene
1,4-dioxane
Et 2O
CHCl 3
EtOAc
THF
CH2Cl 2
i PrOH
Acetone
Ethanol
Methanol
MeCN
H2O
1 I 3
(7)
33
(70) I
122
(26)
8
(18)
100
(211)
60
(132)
50
(105)
50
(105)
100
(211)
100
(211)
17
(35) I
2 I 4
(8)
100
(199) I S
10
(20)
100
(199)
100
(199)
50
(99)
20
(40)
100
(199)
200
(398)
10
(20) I
3 I 6
(12)
100
(188) I S
8
(16)
50
(94)
200
(377)
100
(188)
14
(27)
200
(377)
200
(377)
11
(21) I
4 I 6
(12)
33
(65) I S
5
(10)
25
(49)
25
(49)
50
(97)
7
(14) S S
5
(10) I
a Dielectric constant increases from left to right. b mgc in mg/mL and, in parenthesis, mM. c I: insoluble.
S: soluble.
All gels were stable at room temperature for weeks. To check their thermoreversibility,
the best gels at concentrations equal or higher than mgc (Table 2) were heated to just
below the boiling temperature and then they were allowed to cool down to room
temperature. The heating-cooling cycle was repeated twice, thus providing evidence for
the gel formation as the physical bonds could be disrupted upon heating and reformed
during cooling. Gels from the four compounds were thermoreversible in toluene,
Page 7 of 24 Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
8
acetonitrile, dichloromethane and, in the case of compound 1, also in chloroform. They
were not in alcohols and ethers.
Table 2. Thermoreversible behaviour of compounds 1-4 in some solvents.
Compound
Solvent and concentrationa Toluene
CHCl 3
CH2Cl 2
MeCN
c1 c2 c1 c1 c1 c2
1 7 15 26 132 35 50
2 8 20 S 199 20 43
3 12 22 S 377 21 35
4 12 21 S 49 10 20
a c1 (mgc) and c2 in mM. S: soluble
2. Scanning Electron Microscopy
SEM experiments were carried out to investigate the morphology of the gels obtained
from 40 mM solutions in toluene. This concentration allowed us to obtain the best
defined structures to be analyzed. SEM micrographs of xerogels from 7, 15 and 40 mM
solutions of 1 in toluene, with different magnification each, are provided in the ESI.
Toluene is a solvent appropriate to perform NMR experiments conducted to gain insight
into the sol-gel process. SEM micrographs of the corresponding xerogels were obtained
at a pressure of 70 Pa for all four tetrapeptides (Fig. 3). Tetrapeptide 1 exhibited the
most defined structures, giving bundles of fibres with variable width (100-600 nm).
Tetrapeptide 2 gave homogeneous and non defined structures with the appearance of
Page 8 of 24Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
9
rough spheres and more poorly defined and wider bundles were observed for
tetrapeptide 3. Compound 4 gave wide and undefined structures although it is possible
to appreciate very small fibres that are intertwined with each other. This fits well with
the higher molecular flexibility of 4 due to the absence of the ester group at the C-
terminus, thus avoiding hydrogen-bond interactions. This fact accounts for the less
ordered molecular and supramolecular structures observed. The different behaviour of
tetrapeptide 2, affording a spherulitic instead of a fibrillar network in the xerogel, was
also evidenced in solution. In that case, a helical folding was observed while 1 and 3
presented β-sheet-type folding.17
Furthermore, the definition of the supramolecular structures for 1–3 correlate
well with the level of conformational order observed for the same molecules in
solution.17 These properties emphasize the influence of the linear segment length
connecting the cyclobutane moieties.
10 µµµµm 40 µµµµm
(a) (b)
20 µµµµm 10 µµµµm
(c) (d)
Fig. 3 SEM images of samples of 1 (a), 2 (b), 3 (c) and 4 (d) as xerogels (from toluene) on graphite at 70
Pa.
Page 9 of 24 Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
10
3. IR spectroscopy
The N-H and C=O regions of the vibrational spectra of 1-4 in the solid state were
investigated by IR spectroscopy (ATR mode), as were the corresponding bands for the
xerogels from toluene (30 mM in KBr) and solution (5 mM in chloroform). Note that
toluene was not used due to aggregation problems. Results are summarized in Table S1
in the ESI.
No significant differences were observed between the spectra of the four
xerogels. In chloroform solution, tetrapeptides 1-3 showed one band at about 3420 -
3440 cm-1 due to non-associated N-H stretching. Bands corresponding to associate N-H
stretching were not observed in any case. In contrast, compound 4 showed two bands of
comparable intensity and about 3440 and 3310 cm-1 (toluene) corresponding to free and
associate N-H stretching, respectively. The N-H stretching bands were shifted to lower
wave number and their intensity was increased when passing from liquid solution to
solid, in accordance with the formation of aggregates.
Relevant features were not observed in the C=O region.
4. Circular Dichroism Spectroscopy
CD spectroscopy was used to obtain more information about the self assembly
of the four compounds. The solid-state CD spectra of the xerogels (30 mM in KBr)
from toluene displayed bisignate Cotton effects (Fig. 4). They showed a negative Cotton
effect at 224-226 nm and a positive one at 242-251 nm. This CD signature differs from
the ones obtained for 0.5 mM solutions of these compounds in methanol that showed
only one negative peak at 217-219 nm for 1 and 3 in agreement with β-sheet-like
structures, and one peak at 223 nm attributable to a 14-helical folding in solution for 2.17
Page 10 of 24Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
11
Fig. 4. CD spectra from xerogels from toluene in KBr, c = 30 mM.
Therefore, comparison of the CD spectra indicates that the supramolecular
arrangement in the xerogel is different from the molecular conformational structures in
solution. Moreover, the CD signature observed for the xerogels obtained from toluene
suggests that the molecules are organised in helical structures in the supramolecular
aggregates, as observed for related systems previously studied in our laboratory and
shown in Fig. 1.16 Similar CD spectroscopic features were observed for the gels formed
from other systems also described as arranged in supramolecular helical structures.19
5. Computational calculations for tetrapeptide 1.
To establish the main interactions responsible for the supramolecular arrangement of
these compounds, computational calculations were carried out on tetrapeptide 1 (Fig. 5).
Page 11 of 24 Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
12
HN
O
NH
O
NH
O
NHO
MeO
O
O Ph10
2527
18 1916
15
24
9
Fig. 5 Structure of hybrid α,β-tetrapeptide 1 showing some selected atom numeration.
A conformational search was accomplished for a tetrameric aggregate of 1. In
the most stable structure, intramolecular hydrogen bonds prevail in the terminal units,
whereas the central tetrapeptide molecules interact with each other forming
intermolecular hydrogen bonds with their neighbours (CO9-NH10, CO15-NH16, CO18-
NH19 and CO24-NH25). This is in accordance to a head-to-head-type orientation.
From the interaction pattern between the central molecules, the structures of
dimeric, D, tetrameric, T, and hexameric, H, aggregates were optimized using the M06-
2X density functional method with the 6-31G(d) basis set (Fig. 6). These structures
show a tendency of tetrapeptide 1 to form helical aggregates.
An alternative interaction pattern has also been explored for the dimeric and
tetrameric aggregates (see ESI), but the corresponding structures are energetically less
favourable than those shown in Fig. 6.
Page 12 of 24Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
13
D T
H
Fig. 6 Structures of dimeric (D), tetrameric (T) and hexameric (H) aggregates of peptide 1 optimized
at the M06-2X/6-31G(d) level of calculation. Selected interatomic distances are in Å. Non polar
hydrogen atoms were omitted for clarity
If we focus our attention in the hydrogen bond distances between the central
molecules, we can observe a tendency to strengthen the interaction as the number of
molecules increases. This fact can be confirmed when the aggregation energies are
considered (see Table 3). As a matter of fact, the aggregation energy per molecule
(∆E/n) linearly increases (in absolute value) with the number of molecules, in such a
way that there is a cooperative effect in the aggregation process.
Page 13 of 24 Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
14
Table 3. Aggregation energiesa computed for tetrapeptide 1
In vacuob In toluenec
∆E ∆E/n ∆E ∆E/n
D (n=2) −22.1 −11.0 −15.8 −7.9
T (n=4) −76.9 −19.2 −50.6 −12.6
H (n=6) −149.7 −25.0 −105.8 −17.6
a All values in kcal mol-1. ∆E corresponds to the n 1 → (1)n process. b M06-2X/6-31G(d) level of
calculation. c SMD-M06-2X/6-311+G(d,p)//M06-2X/6-31G(d) level of calculation.
From the central units of the hexameric aggregate H, idealized helical octameric and
hexadecameric aggregates were built and their structures were optimized at the MMFF
level of calculation in chloroform solution. The structure obtained for the
hexadecameric aggregate is shown in Fig. 7.
Side view
Top view
Fig. 7. Structure of the hexadecameric aggregate of peptide 1 optimized at the MMFF level of calculation
in chloroform. Non polar hydrogen atoms have been omitted for clarity.
Page 14 of 24Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
15
6. High-resolution NMR spectroscopy studies for tetrapeptide 1
Gelation induces reduced mobility of the molecules. Therefore, if gelation is slow
compared to NMR time scale measurement, this dynamic process can be monitored by
variable temperature 1H-NMR experiments. By decreasing temperature a continuous
signal line broadening is observed and finally a complete signal loss is produced due to
the increasing “solid-like” part of the gel, which is NMR invisible.20 Furthermore, if
gelation process is monitored in sufficiently slow motion, a differential behaviour of
signals can be observed which helps to better understand the gel-formation dynamic
process. Adequate conditions of sample concentration and appropriate cooling down
gradient temperature are crucial in these experiments because gelation process strongly
depends on both interdependent factors. In this specific study, a controlled cooling
down regime was applied to a 30 mM sample in toluene-d8. Solutions with other
concentrations (ca. 15 ad 45 mM) were also used affording results similar to those
obtained with the 30 mM sample, which gave the most suitable signals for the NMR
studies undertaken regarding intensity and resolution. 1H-NMR spectra were acquired in
5 K steps, starting from 375 K and lowering to 275 K (Fig. 8). An equilibration period
of three minutes was used as sample thermal equilibration period.
For all protons, two well separated stages are observed during the cooling
regime. In the former, just prior to gelation, the intensity increases and signals become
sharper. This is due to a molecule fixation positioning with a restricted conformational
motion. In a second stage, signal intensity starts to decay and this is due to gelation
process itself. It is noticeable that this occurs at slightly different temperatures for each
NH proton (Fig. 8a).
Page 15 of 24 Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
16
Unfortunately, NH19 proton is overlapped by the toluene signal and its complete
behaviour cannot be evidenced. Compared with NH10 and NH25, the fastest intensity
attenuation corresponds to NH16, which starts its signal decay at 350 K vs. 340 K for the
other protons. This observation correlates satisfactorily with the performed calculations
in the sense that NH16 is positioned in a centred point of the gel structure which is
expected to be a more rigid region compared to the gel sides (Fig. 7). (Graphical plots
for each proton are shown in the ESI).
NH19 NH16 NH25 NH10
Fig. 8 Gelation process monitored by variable-temperature 1H NMR spectroscopy experiments in 30 mM
solutions of 1 in toluene-d8. A 400 MHz Bruker Avance III spectrometer equipped with a cooling unit
BCU-Xtreme was used. (a) NH region from 5.6 ppm to 7.3 ppm. (b) Aliphatic region from 2.8 ppm to 5.2
ppm.
Another interesting feature about gel formation was observed in the aliphatic
region (Fig 8 b). Here a quite noticeable differential behaviour of diastereotopic protons
Page 16 of 24Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
17
was observed during gelation process, both in terms of chemical displacement direction
and gelation point. It should be highlighted that, to the best of our knowledge, this
behaviour has not been reported before. In order to better visualize the differences,
graphical plots are presented in the ESI for the three pairs of diastereotopic protons H7,
H17 and H26. For instance, it is observed that while H7a proton starts to attenuate at 330
K, H7b attenuates at 350 K. This indicates that gelation is being oriented in a direction
that restrains the mobility of one of the diastereotopic protons. A more pronounced
signal decay for both protons starts at 310 K, which is attributed to the global network
gelation. Moreover, a remarkable perturbation in the chemical shift displacement
tendency of H7b is observed at this point due to a conformational change to
accommodate gelation. Finally, once the gel is totally formed below 290 K, the same
very low intensity is observed for both protons. Similar differential behaviour is
observed for H17 and H26 diastereotopic pairs of protons, although in a minor degree for
the later pair. This can be also explained with the help of computational calculations
that suggest a structure for aggregates where it is clearly observed that proR H17 is
parallel to hydrogen bonding direction, while proS H17 is in a perpendicular position
(Fig. 9).
Page 17 of 24 Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
18
Fig. 9 Three consecutive peptide molecules from the hexadecameric aggregate of peptide 1 optimized at the MMFF level of calculation in chloroform. proR and proS hydrogen atoms of the central molecule are represented by yellow and brown spheres, respectively, and they correspond to
H7, H17 and H26 methylene protons from left to right.
On the other hand, both proR and proS H26 protons are situated approximately at
the same angle regarding hydrogen bonding direction, therefore justifying their more
similar behaviour.
Furthermore, cyclobutane H11/H20 protons also show a remarkable differential
behaviour since H11 starts gelation much earlier than H20 (365 K vs. 335 K). This is
consistent with the different structural surroundings for both protons and their distinct
alignment with respect to hydrogen bonding direction.
Conclusions
The three hybrid α,β-, β,β- and γ,β-tetrapeptides investigated have shown their
capability to gelate several organic solvents, being toluene that requiring the lowest
mgc. SEM revealed that, while 1, 3 and 4 present fibrillar networks in the xerogel, a
spherulitic netwok is evidenced for 2. The most defined and regular morphology was
observed for 1, fact that correlates the flexibility of tetrapeptides 1–3 with their ability
to self assemble into ordered aggregates, as previously observed in solution.
Computational calculations performed on 1 suggest a helical arrangement of the
self-assemblies in excellent agreement with CD and NMR spectroscopies and suggest
that in the aggregates there is a more rigid central region and two more flexible ones
corresponding to the N- and C-terminus at the sides of the aggregate structure. This
agrees nicely with NMR results and allowed us to conclude that the structure of 1
around the gelation point has two differentiated regions concerning mobility. In the
more rigid central one, NH16 is the hydrogen-bonding promoter thus acting as the
Page 18 of 24Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
19
gelation driving-force. Furthermore, NMR experiments pointed out that gelation occurs
in such a way that a chiral supramolecular structure is produced, which strongly agrees
with a certain degree of chiral helicity in accordance with CD studies and also with
computational calculations, as shown in Fig. 7.
Experimental
Procedure for gel preparation
A small amount (5.0 ± 0.1 mg) of peptide is weighted in a 2 mL transparent-glass vial
with septum screw-on cap. When the 5 mg amount of peptide is soluble in a specific
solvent, a new vial containing 10 ± 0.1 mg is prepared and the solubility-gelification
checked again. In a second step, a certain volume of solvent to be tested is added and
the vial closed. The minimum volume added is 0.05 mL. Then the mixture is heated
under the boiling point of the solvent using a balloon system in order to avoid solvent
pressure and, once a solution is obtained the mixture is sonicated for 1 to 5 minutes. For
high concentrations and also in some solvents, previous sonication is needed for a good
solubilization during heating and sonication time is usually shorter than for diluted gels.
Then, the mixture is left to stabilize and to reach room temperature. To state that the
mixture is a gel the tube inversion test is done just by turning the vial upside down (see
ESI). If the sample is a gel it does not drop and if it drops a little it can be classified as
gel-like mixture. We can also state the mixtures as solutions or insoluble systems. In
order to determine the mgc, a new volume of solvent is added to the gel and the process
is repeated until no gel is formed: the last volume added determines the mgc.
SEM measurements
Page 19 of 24 Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
20
Wet gels were disposed on a carbon-film-coated copper grid and dried by standing for
30 minutes on the grid. The resulting xerogels (dry gels) were then introduced into the
microscope working at 70 Pa and 5 kV.
Computational details
A Montecarlo conformational search21 using the MMFF22 force field implemented in
the Macromodel program23 was carried out for a tetrameric aggregate of 1. The solvent
effect has been included through the GB/SA method 24 using chloroform as solvent.
The structures of dimeric, tetrameric and hexameric aggregates were optimized
using the M06-2X25 density functional method with the 6-31G(d) basis set. Harmonic
vibrational frequencies were computed for the structures of dimeric and tetrameric
aggregates to ensure that they correspond to energy minima (all frequencies are real).
The energies of the obtained structures were recalculated at the same level of
calculation with the 6-311+G(d,p) basis set in toluene solution using the SMD
method.26 These calculations were done using the Gaussian-09 program.27
Acknowledgements
The authors thank financial support from Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
(grant CTQ2010-15408/BQU) and Generalitat de Catalunya (grant 2009SGR-733 and
XRQTC). They are also grateful to European Union for COST Action CM0803. Time
allocated in the Servei de Ressonància Magnètica Nuclear (UAB) and CESCA is
gratefully acknowledged
References
Page 20 of 24Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
21
1 For some reviews on recent applications, see: A. R. Hirst, B. Escuder, J. F. Miravet
and D. K. Smith, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2008, 47, 8002-8018; S. Banerjee, R. K. Das
and U. Maitra, J. Mater. Chem., 2009, 19, 6649–6687; J. W. Steed, Chem. Commun.,
2011, 47, 1379–1383.
2 D. Chitkara, A. Shikanov, N. Kumar and A. J. Domb, Macromol. Biosci., 2006, 6,
977-990; K. Jilie and M. Li, “Smart polymers: Applications in biotechnology and
biomedicine”, I. Galaev, B. Mattiasson (Eds), Smart Hydrogels, CRC Press, second
edition, New York, 2008, 247-268.
3 R. G. Ellis-Behnke, Y. –X. Liang, S. –W. You, D. K. C. Tay, S. Zhang, K.– F. So and
G. E. Schneider, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A., 2006, 103, 5054-5059.
4 J. Puigmartí-Luis, V. Laukhin, A. Pérez del Pino, J. Vidal-Gancedo, C. Rovira, E.
Laukhina and D. B. Amabilino, Angew. Chem., Int. Ed., 2007, 46, 238-241.
5 B. Escuder, F. Rodríguez-Llansola and J.F. Miravet, New J. Chem., 2010, 34, 1044-
1054.
6 See, for example: A. Brizard, R. Oda and I. Huc, Top. Curr. Chem., 2005, 256, 167–
218; D. K. Smith, Chem. Soc. Rev., 2009, 38, 684–694.
7 For some reviews and some examples, see: F. Fages, F. Vögtle and M. Žinic, Top.
Curr. Chem., 2005, 256, 77–131; D. J. Adams and P. D. Topham, Soft Matter, 2010, 6,
3707–3721; C. Lagadec and D. K. Smith, Chem. Commun., 2011, 47, 340–342.
8 C. Tomasini and N. Castellucci, Chem. Soc. Rev. 2013, DOI: 10.1039/C2CS35284B.
9 See, for example: A. M. Smith, R. J. Williams, C. Tang, P. Coppo, R. F. Collins, M.
L. Turner, A. Saiani and R. V. Ulijn, Adv. Mater., 2008, 20, 37–41; L. Chen, K. Morris,
A. Laybourn, D. Elias, M. R. Hicks, A. Rodger, L. Serpell and D. J. Adams, Langmuir,
2010, 26, 5232–5242; B. Adhikari and A. Banerjee, Soft Matter , 2011, 7, 9259–9266;
D. M. Ryan and B. L. Nilsson, Polym. Chem., 2012, 3, 18–33; M. Hughes, P. W. J. M.
Page 21 of 24 Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
22
Frederix, J. Raeburn, L. S. Birchall, J. Sadownik, F. C. Coomer, I. -H. Lin, E. J. Cussen,
N. T. Hunt, T. Tuttle, S. J. Webb, D. J. Adams and R. V. Ulijn, Soft Matter, 2012, 8,
5595–5602.
10 See, for example: M. Zhou, A. M. Smith, A. K. Das, N. W. Hodson, R. F. Collins, R.
V. Ulijn and J. E. Gough, Biomaterials, 2009, 30, 2523–2530; J. P. Jung, J. Z.
Gasiorowski and J. H. Collier, Biopolymers Peptide Science, 2009, 94, 49-59; J. B.
Matson, R. H. Zha and S. I. Stupp, Curr. Opin. Solid State Mater. Sci., 2011, 15, 225–
235; J. B. Matsona and S. I. Stupp, Chem. Commun., 2012, 48, 26–33.
11 V. J. Nebot, J. Armengol, J. Smets, S. Fernández Prieto, B. Escuder and J. F.
Miravet, Chem.–Eur. J., 2012, 18, 4063–4072.
12 F. Rúa, S. Boussert, T. Parella, I. Díez-Pérez, V. Branchadell, E. Giralt and R. M.
Ortuño, Org. Lett., 2007, 9, 3643-3645.
13 E. Torres, E. Gorrea, E. Da Silva, P. Nolis, V. Branchadell and R. M. Ortuño, Org.
Lett., 2009, 11, 2301-2304.
14 E. Torres, E. Gorrea, K. K. Burusco, E. Da Silva, P. Nolis, F. Rúa, S. Boussert, I.
Díez-Pérez, S. Dannenberg, S. Izquierdo, E. Giralt, C. Jaime, V. Branchadell and R. M.
Ortuño, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2010, 8, 564-575.
15 E. Gorrea, G. Pohl, P. Nolis, S. Celis, K. K. Burusco, V. Branchadell, A. Perczel and
R. M. Ortuño, J. Org. Chem. 2012, 77, 9795-9806.
16 E. Gorrea, P. Nolis, E. Torres, E. Da Silva, D.B. Amabilino, V. Branchadell and
R.M. Ortuño, Chem. Eur. J., 2011, 17, 4588-4597.
17 S. Celis, E. Gorrea, P. Nolis, O. Illa and R. M. Ortuño, Org. Biomol. Chem., 2012,
10, 861-868.
18. See, for instance: S. Iqbal, B. Escuder and J. F. Miravet, Eur. J. Org. Chem., 2008,
4580-4590.
Page 22 of 24Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
23
19 F.J.M. Hoeben, M. Wolffs, J. Zhiang, S. De Feyter, P. Leclère, A.P.H.J. Schenning
and W.E. Meijer, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2007, 129, 9819-9828; S. R. Nam, H.Y. Lee and
J.-I. Hong, Chem. Eur., J. 2008, 14, 6040-6043; P. Iavicoli, H. Xu, L.N. Feldborg, M.
Linares, M. Paradinas, S. Stafström, C. Ocal, B. Nieto-Ortega, J. Casado, J.T. López-
Navarrete, R. Lazzaroni, S. De Feyter and D. B. Amabilino, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 2010,
132, 9350-9362.
20 T. Brand, P. Nolis, S. Richter and S. Berger, S. Magn. Reson. Chem., 2008, 45, 325-
329.
21 G. Chang, W.C. Guida and W.C. Still, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1989, 111, 4379-4386; G.
Chang, W.C. Guida and W.C. Still, J. Am. Chem. Soc., 1990, 112, 1419-1427.
22 T. A. Halgren, J. Comput. Chem., 1996, 17, 490-519.
23 F. Mohamadi, N.G.J. Richards, W.C. Guida, R. Liskamp, M. Lipton, C. Caufield, G.
Chang, T. Hendrickson and W.C. Still, J. Comput. Chem., 1990, 11, 440-467;
MacroModel 9.0. http://www.schrodinger.com
24 D. Qiu, P.S. Shenkin, F.P. Hollinger and W.C. Still, J. Phys. Chem. A,1997, 101,
3005-3014.
25 Y. Zhao and D. G. Truhlar, Theor. Chem. Acc., 2008, 120, 215-241
26 A. V. Marenich, C. J. Cramer and D. G. Truhlar, J. Phys. Chem. B, 2009, 113, 6378.
27 Gaussian 09, Revision C.01, M. J. Frisch, G. W. Trucks, H. B. Schlegel, G. E.
Scuseria, M. A. Robb, J. R. Cheeseman, G. Scalmani, V. Barone, B. Mennucci, G. A.
Petersson, H. Nakatsuji, M. Caricato, X. Li, H. P. Hratchian, A. F. Izmaylov, J. Bloino,
G. Zheng, J. L. Sonnenberg, M. Hada, M. Ehara, K. Toyota, R. Fukuda, J. Hasegawa,
M. Ishida, T. Nakajima, Y. Honda, O. Kitao, H. Nakai, T. Vreven, J. A. Montgomery,
Jr., J. E. Peralta, F. Ogliaro, M. Bearpark, J. J. Heyd, E. Brothers, K. N. Kudin, V. N.
Staroverov, R. Kobayashi, J. Normand, K. Raghavachari, A. Rendell, J. C. Burant, S. S.
Page 23 of 24 Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online
24
Iyengar, J. Tomasi, M. Cossi, N. Rega, J. M. Millam, M. Klene, J. E. Knox, J. B. Cross,
V. Bakken, C. Adamo, J. Jaramillo, R. Gomperts, R. E. Stratmann, O. Yazyev, A. J.
Austin, R. Cammi, C. Pomelli, J. W. Ochterski, R. L. Martin, K. Morokuma, V. G.
Zakrzewski, G. A. Voth, P. Salvador, J. J. Dannenberg, S. Dapprich, A. D. Daniels, Ö.
Farkas, J. B. Foresman, J. V. Ortiz, J. Cioslowski, and D. J. Fox, Gaussian, Inc.,
Wallingford CT, 2009. http://www.gaussian.com
Page 24 of 24Organic & Biomolecular Chemistry
Org
anic
& B
iom
ole
cula
r C
hem
istr
y A
ccep
ted
Man
usc
rip
t
Dow
nloa
ded
by P
urdu
e U
nive
rsity
on
09 M
arch
201
3Pu
blis
hed
on 2
5 Fe
brua
ry 2
013
on h
ttp://
pubs
.rsc
.org
| do
i:10.
1039
/C3O
B27
347D
View Article Online