Level 1 - Implementation Overview
Local Single Sky ImPlementation LSSIP 2017 - AZERBAIJAN
EUROCONTROL
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan Released Issue
Document Title LSSIP Year 2017 for Azerbaijan
Infocentre Reference 18/02/26/07
Date of Edition 05/09/18
LSSIP Focal Point Agabek Balabekov – [email protected]
LSSIP Contact Person Predrag Vranjkovic ‐ [email protected]
Status Released Issue
Intended for Agency Stakeholders
Available in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip
Reference Documents
LSSIP Documents http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip
LSSIP Guidance Material http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/lssip
Master Plan Level 3 – Plan Edition 2017
http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐implementation‐plan
Master Plan Level 3 – Report Year 2016
http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/european‐atm‐master‐plan‐level‐3‐implementation‐report
European ATM Portal https://www.eatmportal.eu and http://www.atmmasterplan.eu/
STATFOR Forecasts http://www.eurocontrol.int/statfor
Acronyms and abbreviations http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan Released Issue
APPROVAL SHEET
The following authorities have approved all parts of the LSSIP Year 2017 document and their signature confirms the correctness of the reported information and reflects their commitment to implement the actions laid down in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan – Edition 2017 (also known as the ESSIP Plan).
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan Released Issue
CONTENTS
1. National ATM Environment ............................................................. 6 Geographical Scope .............................................................................................6 1.1. National Stakeholders .........................................................................................8 1.2.
2. Traffic and Capacity ....................................................................... 17 Evolution of traffic in Azerbaijan ...................................................................... 17 2.1. ACC BAKU ......................................................................................................... 18 2.2.
3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions ............. 20
4. Implementation Projects ............................................................... 21 National projects .............................................................................................. 21 4.1. Regional projects .............................................................................................. 23 4.2.
5. Cooperation activities .................................................................... 24 FAB Co‐ordination ............................................................................................ 24 5.1. Regional cooperation ....................................................................................... 24 5.2.
6. Implementation Objectives Progress ............................................. 25 State View......................................................................................................... 25 6.1. Detailed Objectives Implementation progress ................................................ 30 6.2.
Annexes
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 1 Released Issue
Executive Summary
National ATM Context
Azerbaijan is the farthest ECAC Member State to the east of Europe bordering with Kazakhstan, Turkmenistan and Russia to the North and East, Islamic Republic of Iran to the South and Georgia, Armenia and Turkey to the West.
Azerbaijan is among the former USSR countries with the highest economic development characteristics in the area. Azerbaijan’s economy is dynamically evolving and supporting a liberalised political, economic and social system. Oil and gas production, the chemical industry, agriculture and tourism have become the backbone for this swift advance.
Since November 17, 2011, all countries of the former USSR bordering Azerbaijan have switched to a reduced minimum of vertical separation (RVSM), which has significantly increased the capacity of the air routes through the region and reduced the risks of errors. The transition has eliminated the need for switching between feet system of separation to metric system and back. The airways over the Azerbaijan allowed significantly reduced the way from Europe to the countries of South – East Asia, as well as from the Middle East to Europe and the USA.
In August 2017, within the State Civil Aviation Administration, was created a State Inspection for the Safety all of the aviation activities in Azerbaijan. The main function of State Safety Inspection is the put into practice of safety oversight.
The following legislation documents were developed and implemented by SCAA in 2017 “AAR – ATC PEL’ and will be implemented in 2018 “AAR – aeronautical charts”; “AAR – AIS”.
Azerbaijan is playing a proactive role in the regional and international co‐operation in ATM. In addition to ICAO and ECAC membership, Azerbaijan has joined CANSO.
Traffic and Capacity
Traffic in Azerbaijan increased by 4.6% during Summer 2017 (May to October), when compared to the same period during 2016.
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 2 Released Issue
8; 29%
7; 25%5; 18%
4; 14%
4; 14%
Completed
Ongoing
Planned
Late
No Plan
Not Applicable
Missing Data
Undefined
Implementation Objectives Overview
The figure on the left shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the pre‐SESAR and PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1.2 ‐ PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest except AOP14, ATC02.9, ATC18 and NAV12 are considered pre‐SESAR. The four aforementioned objectives are neither pre‐SESAR nor PCP and will be part of an overall future indicator covering the SESAR 1 phase.
Note that two objectives – AOM19.1 and FCM05 – are considered as both part of the pre‐SESAR and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases.
The objectives declared ‘Achieved’ in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition 2011‐2015) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State.
Progress distribution for applicable Implementation Objectives
The overall progress of implementation in Azerbaijan is very good. Only 4 implementation objectives are currently delayed in implementation. The rest are progressing on time towards the planned deadlines.
Progress per SESAR Phase
The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the pre‐SESAR and PCP elements. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant objectives as shown in Chapter 6.1.2 ‐ PCP objectives are marked as such, the rest except AOP14, ATC02.9, ATC18 and NAV12 are considered pre‐SESAR. The four aforementioned objectives are neither pre‐SESAR nor PCP and will be part of an overall future indicator covering the SESAR 1 phase.
Note that two objectives – AOM19.1 and FCM05 – are considered as both part of the pre‐SESAR and PCP so their progress contributes to the percentage of both phases.
The objectives declared ‘Achieved’ in previous editions (up to, and including, ESSIP Edition 2011‐2015) are also taken into account for as long as they were linked to the Level 2 of the ATM Master Plan and implemented by the State.
Pre‐SESAR Implementation
2010 2019
70%
PCP Implementation
2015 2023
11%
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 3 Released Issue
Progress per SESAR Key Feature and Phase
The figure below shows the progress made so far, per SESAR Key Feature, in the implementation of the pre‐SESAR and the PCP elements. The percentages are calculated as an average, per Key Feature, of the same objectives as in the previous paragraph.
ICAO ASBUs Progress Implementation
The figure below shows the progress made so far in the implementation of the ICAO ASBUs both for Block 0 and Block 1. The percentage is calculated as an average of the relevant Objectives contributing to each of the relevant ASBUs; this is explained in Chapter 6.1.3.
Block 0 2010 2018
67%
Block 1 2015 2022
13%
n/a 5% 30% 1%
Pre‐SESAR
75%
100%
90%
19%
Pre‐SESAR
Pre‐SESAR
Pre‐SESAR
PCP
PCP
PCP
PCP
Optimised ATM Network Services
Advanced Air Traffic Services High Performing
Airport Operations
Enabling Aviation Infrastructure
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 4 Released Issue
ATM Deployment Outlook
● State objec ves
Deployed in 2016‐2017: ‐ MTCD & CORA [ATC12.1] 100% progress ‐ Collaborative Flight Planning [FCM03] 100% progress
‐ Coordination and transfer [ATC17] 92% progress ‐ RNAV 1 for TMA Operations [NAV03.1] 88% progress ‐ Voice over IP [COM11] 75% progress ‐ Ground‐Based Safety Nets [ATC02.8] 75% progress ‐ APV Procedures [NAV10] 72% progress ‐ eTOD [INF07] 48% progress ‐ OAT and GAT handling [AOM13.1] 43% progress ‐ Direct Routing [AOM21.1] 10% progress ‐ Interactive Rolling NOP [FCM05] 5% progress ‐ ASM Tools [AOM19.1] 0% progress ‐ ETFMS [FCM01] 0% progress ‐ Low‐Level IFR Routes for Rotorcraft [NAV12] % progress
‐ Enhanced STCA for TMAs [ATC02.9] 0% progress
‐ Extended Flight Plan [FCM08] 0% progress
● Airport objec ves ‐ UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport
Deployed in 2016‐2017:
‐ CCOs [ENV03] 50% progress ‐ Remote Tower [AOP14] 0% progress
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
By 12/2018 By 12/2019 By 12/2020 2021+
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 5 Released Issue
Introduction
The Local Single Sky ImPlementation (LSSIP) documents, as an integral part of the Master Plan (MP) Level 3 (L3) / LSSIP mechanism, constitute a short/medium term implementation plan containing ECAC States’ actions to achieve the Implementation Objectives as set out by the MP Level 3 and to improve the performance of their national ATM System. This LSSIP document describes the situation in the State at the end of December 2017, together with plans for the next years.
Chapter 1 provides an overview of the ATM institutional arrangements within the State, the membership of the State in various international organisations, the organisational structure of the main ATM players ‐ civil and military ‐ and their responsibilities under the national legislation. In addition, an overview of the Airspace Organisation and Classification, the ATC Units, the ATM systems operated by the main ANSP are also provided;
Chapter 2 provides a comprehensive picture of the situation of Air Traffic, Capacity and ATFM Delay per each ACC in the State. It shows the evolution of Air Traffic and Delay in the last five years and the forecast for the next five years. It gives also the achieved performance in terms of delay during the summer season period and the planned projects assumed to offer the required capacity which will match the foreseen traffic increase and keep the delay at the agreed performance level;
Chapter 3 provides a set of conclusions extracted from the MP L3 Implementation Report 2016 which are relevant to the State/stakeholders concerned. The State reports how they have handled those conclusions and the actions taken during the year to address the concerns expressed by those conclusions;
Chapter 4 provides the main Implementation Projects (at national, FAB and regional level) which contribute directly to the implementation of the MP Operational Improvements and/or Enablers and Implementation Objectives. Level 1 document covers high level list of the projects showing the applicable links. All other details like description, timescale, progress made and expected contribution to the ATM Key Performance Areas provided by the State per each project are available in Level 2 document;
Chapter 5 deals with other cooperation activities beyond Implementation Projects. It provides an overview of the FAB cooperation and also all other regional initiatives which are out of the FAB scope. The content of this chapter generally is developed and agreed in close cooperation between the States concerned;
Chapter 6 contains aggregated information at State level covering the overall level of implementation, implementation per SESAR Key Feature and implementation of ICAO ASBUs. In addition the high‐level information on progress and plans of each Implementation Objective is presented. The information for each Implementation Objective is presented in boxes giving a summary of the progress and plans of implementation for each Stakeholder. The conventions used are presented at the beginning of the section.
Level 1 document is completed with a separate document called LSSIP Level 2. This document consists of a set of tables organised in line with the list of Implementation Objectives. Each table contains all the actions planned by the four national stakeholders to achieve their respective Stakeholder Lines of Action (SLoAs) as established in the European ATM Master Plan L3 Implementation Plan Edition 2016.In addition it covers detailed description of the Implementation Projects for the State as extracted from the LSSIP Data Base.
The information contained in Chapter 6 is deemed sufficient to satisfy State reporting requirements towards ICAO in relation to ASBU (Aviation System Block Upgrades) monitoring.
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 6 Released Issue
1. National ATM Environment
Geographical Scope 1.1.
International Membership
Azerbaijan is a Member of the following international organisations in the field of ATM:
Organisation Since
ECAC 2002
EUROCONTROL -
European Union ‐
EASA ‐
ICAO 1992
NATO ATM/CNS Committee
ITU 1992
JAA
Geographical description of the FIR(s)
The geographical scope of this document addresses the single Baku FIR. The FIR boundaries approximate the
state border of Azerbaijan Republic. The region is strategically located at the conjunction of Europe, Central
Asia, and the Middle East. This area has served as a crossroads for centuries, a critical junction in the Silk Road
connecting Europe and Asia.
The following map shows the geographical location of Azerbaijan Republic (indicating the location of main
Airports):
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 7 Released Issue
Baku FIR borders the following FIRs/UIRs:
ECAC/EUROCONTROL States:
‐ West: Yerevan FIR/UIR (Armenia).
‐ North‐West: Tbilisi FIR/UIR (Georgia).
Non‐ECAC States:
‐ North: Rostov FIR/UIR (Russia);
‐ North‐East: Aktau FIR/UIR (Kazakhstan);
‐ East: Turkmenbashi FIR/UIR (Turkmenistan);
‐ South: Tehran FIR/UIR (Iran).
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 8 Released Issue
Airspace Classification and Organisation
All airspace is divided into Upper Airspace and Lower Airspace. The boundary between them is FL285. The graphical presentation is below.
The re‐organisation of the Baku FIR airspace to ensure a uniform and simplified application of ICAO Air Traffic Service classes Flight Level 285 and below within ECAC airspace has been achieved.
National Stakeholders 1.2.
The main National Stakeholders involved in ATM in Azerbaijan are the following:
‐ Government (Cabinet of the Ministry);
‐ State Civil Aviation Administration (SCAA);
‐ “Azerbaijan Hava Yollari” Closed Joint Stock Company;
‐ AZANS – Azerbaijan Air Navigation Services.
Their activities are detailed in the following subchapters and their relationships are shown in the diagram below. Also there is a figure of preliminary structure State Safety Inspection (source CAA,2017)
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 9 Released Issue
GovernmentThe cabinet
CAA Ministry of Defense
“Azerbaijan Hava Yollari”CJSC
Commander of Air ForceAnd Air Defense
Air DefenseAir Force
Aviation SafetyInspection and
Certification Office
Air NavigationServices
Airports National Airlines
Civil Aviation Authority is the responsible body for all civil aviation regulatory matters and reports directly to the government. State inspectorate for civil aviation flight safety is be responsible for oversights (all functions and accountabilities finally are not defined yet).
Issues related to military aviation matters are dealt with through the Ministry of Defence.
Azerbaijan became a member of the International Civil Aviation Organisation (ICAO), the Interstate Aviation Committee (IAC) in 1992 and a member of ECAC since 2002. All Azerbaijan Airlines flights are in compliance with international laws and regulations.
The CAA is directed in its operation by Air Codex, by decrees and orders of the President of Azerbaijan, by decrees and orders of the Government of Azerbaijan, by the SARPs adopted by ICAO, and by other legislative acts. The authority and responsibilities of the CAA are assigned in its Order, affirmed by the Government of Azerbaijan. Acting within its authority, the CAA produces legal documents and oversees other ministries, departments, enterprises, organisations and personnel which regulate the operation of civil aviation in Azerbaijan. The Director of the CAA and his deputies are assigned by decree of the President of Azerbaijan.
Air navigation services, airports authorities, aviation security and national airline are managed by “Azerbaijan Hava Yollari” which is a Closed Joint Stock Company.
Contained within “Azerbaijan Hava Yollari” is “Azeraeronavigation” (AZANS) which is responsible for the provision of air traffic services. AZANS is also responsible for provision of the meteorological and Aeronautical Information Service.
Civil Regulator(s)
General Information
Civil Aviation in Azerbaijan is the responsibility of the Civil Aviation Authority. The different national entities having regulatory responsibilities in ATM are summarised in the table below.
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 10 Released Issue
Activity in ATM: Organisation responsible Legal Basis
Rule‐making CAA / AHY CJSC Aviation Law
Safety Oversight CAA State Safety Programme
Enforcement actions in case of non‐compliance with safety regulatory requirements
Formal procedures for enforcement have yet to be established
Will be established in new edition of State Safety Programme
Airspace CAA Aviation Law
Economic Azerbaijan Hava Yollari CJSC
Aviation Law
Environment CAA Aviation Law
Security CAA/ Azerbaijan Hava Yollari CJSC
Aviation Law
Accident investigation CAA Aviation Law
The creation of a National Supervisory Authority as per the SES Service Provision Regulation has not been implemented in Azerbaijan. The CAA fulfils the role of the NSA.
CAA
The Civil Aviation Authority is responsible for:
‐ Supervision of utilisation of the airspace of Azerbaijan Republic;
‐ Certification of airports, aircraft and equipment;
‐ Supervision of the aviation safety;
‐ Licensing;
‐ Investigation of incidents.
The organisational chart of the CAA is shown in the Annex B of this document.
Annual Report published: N CAA is not yet producing the Annual Report.
Web: www.caa.gov.az
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 11 Released Issue
AZANS (Azerbaijan Air Navigation Services)
Azeraeronavigation (AZANS) is the only ANS provider within Azerbaijan Republic.
AZANS has one FIR for the whole upper airspace of Azerbaijan Republic, six TMA’s at Baku, Ganja, Nakhchivan, Lankaran, Zagatala, Gabala , Yevlakh aerodromes and a CTR at Zabrat heliport. There are also other aerodromes which are not permanently manned by AZANS staff due to lack of traffic.
AZANS is responsible for:
‐ provision of air traffic services;
‐ development of air traffic management system;
‐ maintenance of ATC technical facilities;
‐ modernisation of ATC technical facilities;
‐ provision of aeronautical information service;
‐ provision of meteorological service.
Service provided
Governance: Subdivision of CJSC Ownership: CJSC “Azerbaijan Hava Yollari”
Services provided Y/N Comment
ATC en‐route Y Baku ACC (East and West) Nakhichevan ACC (South)
ATC approach Y Baku APP, Nakhichevan APP/TWR, Ganja APP/TWR, Lankaran APP/TWR , Gabala APP/TWR , Yevlakh APP/TWR
ATC Aerodrome(s) Y Baku TWR , Nakhichevan APP/TWR, Ganja APP/TWR, Lankaran APP/TWR, Zabrat TWR, Zagatala TWR, Gabala TWR, Yevlakh APP/TWR
AIS Y AIP, NOTAMs, AIC, PIB
CNS Y All type of services for all International airports in Azerbaijan
MET Y All type of services for all International airports in Azerbaijan
ATCO training Y National Aviation Academy/AZANS/Outsourcing
Others
Additional information:
Provision of services in other State(s):
N
Annual Report published: N AZANS is still not yet producing Annual Report.
Remark: APP/TWR means combined unit.
Number of air traffic controllers 171
Supervisors 25
ACC 38
APP 32
TWR 95 (including 29 ATCO of heliport)
The organisational chart of AZANS is shown in the Annex B of this document.
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 12 Released Issue
ATC systems in use
Main ANSP part of any technology alliance1 No
FDPS
Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Air Traffic Automation Control System: Indra AIRCON 2100
Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2014
Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? No plans yet
ATC Unit Baku ACC, Baku APP
Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: THALES Eurocat C
Upgrade2 of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2016
Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? No plans yet
ATC Unit Nakhichevan ACC, Nakhichevan APP
SDPS
Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Air Traffic Automation Control System : Indra AIRCON 2100
Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2014
Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? No plans yet
ATC Unit Baku ACC, Baku APP
Specify the manufacturer of the ATC system currently in use: Thales MSSR/PSR and SMR
Upgrade of the ATC system is performed or planned? 2014
Replacement of the ATC system by the new one is planned? No plans yet
ATC Unit Baku ACC, Baku APP
1Technology alliance is an alliance with another service provider for joint procurement of technology from a particular supplier (e.g. COOPANS alliance) 2 Upgrade is defined as any modification that changes the operational characteristics of the system (SES Framework Regulation 549/2004, Article 2 (40))
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 13 Released Issue
ATC Units
The ATC units in the Azerbaijan’s airspace, which are of concern to this LSSIP are the following:
ATC Unit Number of sectors Associated FIR(s) Remarks
En‐route TMA
Baku 2 1 Azerbaijan ACC Baku (West, East)
Ganja 1 Azerbaijan
Nakhichevan 1 1 Azerbaijan ACC Nakhichevan (South)
Zagatala 1 Azerbaijan
Lenkoran 1 Azerbaijan
Gabala 1 Azerbaijan
Yevlakh 1 Azerbaijan
Buffer zones with Russia, Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan were eliminated due to RVSM transition in these
countries.
Airports
General information
Azerbaijan Hava Yollari” CJSC regulates operation of: Heydar Aliyev (Baku), Ganja, Nakhchivan, Zagatala, Naftalan, Gabala, Lankaran, Yevlakh, Sheki airports and Zabrat heliport. This is shown in the picture below. Naftalan, Sheki are not operational due to lack of traffic. Heydar Aliyev (Baku), Ganja, Nakhchivan, Lenkaran, Gabala and Zagatala airports are International.
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 14 Released Issue
Airport(s) covered by the LSSIP
Referring to the List of Airports in the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Plan Edition 2017 – Annex 2, it is up to the individual State to decide which additional airports will be reported through LSSIP for those Objectives.
This edition of the LSSIP contains information regarding the main national airport, Baku Heydar Aliyev. The EUROCONTROL Public Airport Corner also provides information for the following airport(s): https://ext.eurocontrol.int/airport_corner_public/UBBB
Military Authorities
The Military Authorities in Azerbaijan are comprised of:
‐ Ministry of Defence;
‐ Commander of Air Forces and Air Defence;
They report to the Cabinet.
The Commander of Air Forces and Air Defence is the responsible body for military aviation matters in the Azerbaijan Republic. Military authorities provide air traffic services at military aerodromes and designated zones for military training flights and exercises.
There is a military co‐ordination unit established in OPS room of Baku ACC responsible for operational co‐ordination. Although Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA) is not formally defined most of the principles of FUA are in place and the co‐ordination procedures are at very good level.
Regulatory role
Regulatory framework and rule‐making
OAT GAT
OAT and provision of service for OAT governed by national legal provisions?
Y Provision of service for GAT by the Military governed by national legal provisions?
N
Level of such legal provision: Ministry of Defence – Air Law for Air Defence
Level of such legal provision: ‐
Authority signing such legal provision: Minister of Defence
Authority signing such legal provision:
Cabinet of the Ministry
These provisions cover: These provisions cover:
Rules of the Air for OAT Y
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 15 Released Issue
Oversight
Service Provision role
Military ANSP providing GAT services SES certified?
N If YES, since: Duration of the Certificate:
Certificate issued by: N If NO, is this fact reported to the EC in accordance with SES regulations?
Organisation of military ATS for OAT Y Organisation of military ATS for GAT N
OAT/GAT Co‐ordination Y OAT/GAT Co‐ordination Y
ATCO Training N ATCO Training N
ATCO Licensing N ATCO Licensing N
ANSP Certification N ANSP Certification N
ANSP Supervision N ANSP Supervision N
Aircrew Training N ESARR applicability N
Aircrew Licensing N
Additional Information: Additional Information:
Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:
Means used to inform airspace users (other than military) about these provisions:
National AIP N National AIP Y
National Military AIP N National Military AIP N
EUROCONTROL eAIP N EUROCONTROL eAIP N
Other: National VFR Manual ‐ Other: National Regulatory Documents Y
OAT GAT
National oversight body for OAT: Ministry of Defence
No military oversight role
Additional information:
OAT GAT
Services Provided: MIL Services Provided: None
En‐Route N En‐Route N
Approach/TMA N Approach/TMA N
Airfield/TWR/GND Y Airfield/TWR/GND Y
AIS N AIS N
MET N MET N
SAR N SAR N
TSA/TRA monitoring N FIS N
Other: Other:
Additional Information: Additional Information:
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 16 Released Issue
User role
Flexible Use of Airspace (FUA)
IFR inside controlled airspace, Military aircraft can fly?
OAT only GAT only X Both OAT and GAT
If Military fly OAT‐IFR inside controlled airspace, specify the available options:
Free Routing Y Within specific corridors only X
Within the regular (GAT) national route network Y Under radar control Y
Within a special OAT route system Y Under radar advisory service N
If Military fly GAT‐IFR inside controlled airspace, specify existing special arrangements:
No special arrangements N Exemption from Route Charges X
Exemption from flow and capacity (ATFCM) measures N Provision of ATC in UHF N
CNS exemptions: RVSM N 8.33 N Mode S N ACAS N
Others: * If there is request from the military, and radar control is not possible, ATC close the route until the military aircraft has passed through it.
Military in AZ applies FUA requirements as specified in the Regulation No 2150/2005: N
FUA Level 1 implemented: : N
FUA Level 2 implemented: N
FUA Level 3 implemented: N
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 17 Released Issue
2. Traffic and Capacity
Evolution of traffic in Azerbaijan 2.1.
2017 Traffic in Azerbaijan increased by 4.6% during Summer 2017 (May to October), when compared to the same period during 2016.
2018‐2022
The EUROCONTROL Seven‐Year forecast predicts an average annual traffic growth between 2.8% and 6.4%, with an average baseline growth of 4.5% throughout the planning cycle.
0
50,000
100,000
150,000
200,000
250,000
2013 A 2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F
IFR
flig
hts
Azerbaijan - Annual IFR Movements
IFR movements - Actuals
IFR movements - Baseline forecast
IFR movements - High forecast
IFR movements - Low forecast A = ActualF = Forecast
2014 A 2015 A 2016 A 2017 F 2018 F 2019 F 2020 F 2021 F 2022 F 2023 F
H 5.5% 8.3% 6.0% 6.4% 5.5% 5.8% 5.7%
B -1.2% 1.4% 5.1% 4.9% 6.5% 4.0% 4.2% 3.8% 4.0% 4.1%
L 4.4% 4.7% 2.0% 2.8% 2.2% 2.5% 2.5%
ECAC B 1.7% 1.6% 2.8% 4.5% 2.8% 2.1% 1.9% 1.5% 1.7% 1.7%
EUROCONTROL Seven-Year Forecast (September 2017)IFR flights yearly growth
Azerbaijan
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 18 Released Issue
ACC BAKU 2.2.
Summer 2017 performance
Traffic Evolution 2017 Capacity Baseline En-route Delay (min/flight) - Summer Capacity
gap Ref value Actual
+4.6% 65 (0%) 0.01 0.0 No
The average en-route delay per flight remained at zero in Summer 2017.
Capacity Plan: Sufficient Capacity to meet demand Achieved Comments
ATS route network optimisation - an on-going process in co-operation with neighboring States
Yes
Maximum configuration: 5 + 3APP Yes
Summer 2017 performance assessment
The ACC capacity baseline was estimated at 65. During the measured period, the average peak 1 hour demand was 33 and the average peak 3 hour demand was 24.
Planning Period 2017‐2021 ‐ Summer
The planning focuses on the Summer season to reflect the most demanding period of the year from a capacity perspective. This approach ensures consistency with the previous planning cycles.
Summer Capacity Plan
2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
Free Route Airspace
Airspace Management Advanced FUA
Airport & TMA Network Integration
Cooperative Traffic Management
Airspace ATS route network optimisation - an on-going process in co-operation with neighboring States Procedures
Staffing
Technical
Capacity
Significant Events
Max sectors 5 + 3APP 5 + 3APP 5 + 3APP 5 + 3APP 5 + 3APP
Planned Annual Capacity Increase Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand
Reference profile Annual % Increase 0% 0% 0% N/A N/A
Difference Capacity Plan v. Reference Profile
Sufficient capacity to meet expected demand
Annual Reference Value (min) 0.01 0.01 0.01 N/A N/A
Summer reference value (min) 0.01 0.01 0.01 N/A N/A
Additional information
H 65 0% 65 0% 65 0%
Ref. 65 0% 65 0% 65 0%
L 65 0% 65 0% 65 0%
Open 65 0% 65 0% 65 0%
C/R 65 0% 65 0% 65 0%
2018 2019
UBBA 65
ACC2016
baseline 2017
Capacity ProfilesProfiles (hourly movements and % increase over previous year)
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 19 Released Issue
Up to 5 ACC and 3 APP sectors could be open. However, with the current levels of traffic, 3 ACC + 3 APP are sufficient.
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
00:00
02:00
04:00
06:00
08:00
10:00
12:00
14:00
16:00
18:00
20:00
22:00
Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐WD
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
00:00
02:00
04:00
06:00
08:00
10:00
12:00
14:00
16:00
18:00
20:00
22:00
Sectors available ‐ Summer 2018 ‐WE
2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021
2017‐2019 Reference Capacity Profile 65 65 65
Capacity Profile ‐ Shortest Routes (Open) 65 65 65
Capacity Profile ‐ Current Routes 65 65 65
Capacity Profile ‐ High 65 65 65
Capacity Profile ‐ Low 65 65 65
Capacity Baseline 65 65
2017 ‐ 2021 Plan 65 65 65 65 65
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
Cap
acity profile (movements per hour)
UBBACTA - Reference capacity profile and alternative scenarios
2018‐2022 Planning Period Outlook
No problems are foreseen for Azerbaijan during the current planning cycle.
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 20 Released Issue
3. Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report conclusions
Conclusions issued from the European ATM Master Plan Level 3 Implementation Report 2016 applicable to Azerbaijan for all items that require corrective actions and improvements.
Conclusion Applicable to VERY GOOD PROGRESS IN IMPLEMENTATION OF BOTH FREE ROUTE AND DIRECT
ROUTING.
THIS MOMENTUM SHOULD BE KEPT AND SUPPORTED BY ALL INVOLVED STAKEHOLDERS.
(page 14 of the Report)
All State that are
implementing
AOM21.1 and
AOM21.2 State’s action planned for this conclusion: YES
Description of the planned action: Azerbaijan is implementing direct routing on its territory. Implementation
of the FRA concept is not being implemented at this stage due to complexity of the airspace and issue of
restricted flight zone at its territory.
Conclusion Applicable to ADQ IMPLEMENTATION ISSUES HAVE TO BE ADDRESSED AS SOON AS POSSIBLE AS THEY
CAN IMPACT ON SWIM IMPLEMENTATION. (page 25 of the Report) All States + EC
State’s action planned for this conclusion: YES
Description of the planned action: ADQ regulation is not applicable in AZ. However, AZ is following all trends in this area and much functionality related to ADQ is already available. Moreover, roadmap in AIM area is
established to implement these functionalities.
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 21 Released Issue
4. Implementation Projects
National projects 4.1.
Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links:
Implement full back‐up ATC system at Baku ACC (BCUP‐ACC)
AZANS (AZ) 2018 Ongoing ‐
Implementation of Airspace Efficiency, Strategy and Development Center (ASEC) (FLOW)
AZANS (AZ) 2018 Ongoing L3: FCM05, FCM06, FCM08
Implementation of VSAT Communication System (VSAT)
AZANS (AZ) 2018 Ongoing L2: CNS‐0001‐A
Implementation of complete AIS to AIM system (AIS‐AIM)
AZANS (AZ) 2018 Ongoing L3: INF07, ITY‐ADQ
Implementation of the Virtual Tower with remote control on Chilov Island (RTWR_Chilov)
AZANS (AZ) February 2018 ‐ December 2018
Planned L3: AOP14
Installation of METEO radars (METEO AZ)
AZANS (AZ), Ganja Airport (AZ), Nakhchivan Airport (AZ)
2018 Ongoing L3: ITY‐ADQ
Installlation of new satelite connection system with adjecent ATS centres (SAT_AZ)
AZANS (AZ) 2018 Ongoing ‐
MSSR Radar instalation at Yevlakh Airport (MSSR‐UBEE)
Yevlakh Airport (AZ) 2018 Ongoing L3: ITY‐ACID, ITY‐SPI
Modernisation of ILS at Baku Airport (ILS‐Baku)
AZANS (AZ), BAKU ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (AZ)
2019 Planned L2: CNS‐0001‐A
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 22 Released Issue
Name of project: Organisation(s): Schedule: Status: ATM MP Links:
Runway extension and ATC system renewal at Zaqatala International Airport (RWY‐UBBY)
AZANS (AZ) 2018 Ongoing ‐
The second phase of installation of ADS‐B and WAM system (Phase II ADS‐B)
AZANS (AZ) 2018 Ongoing L3: ITY‐ACID, ITY‐SPI
Upgrade of the Nakhchivan Airport runway and navigation AIDS (ATM‐UBBN)
Nakhchivan Airport (AZ)
2018 Ongoing ‐
Implementation of the ATC Contingency System in Baku ASEC building
AZANS (AZ) 2018 Ongoing
Implementation of MoC AZANS‐IATA
AZANS (AZ) 2018 Ongoing
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 23 Released Issue
Regional projects 4.2.
OLDI system implementation. (OLDI)
Organisation(s): AZANS (AZ) Type of project: Regional
Schedule: 2018
Status: Ongoing
Description: Implementation of OLDI system at Baku ACC center.
Link and references
ATM MP links: L3: ATC17
Other links: ‐
Project included in RP2 Performance Plan:
‐ Name/Code in RP2 Performance Plan:
‐
Project included in DP2016:
‐ Name/Code in DP2016: ‐
Performance contribution
Safety: +++ Enhancing safety of operations through more efficient COMs.
Environment: ‐
Capacity: +++ Creating new capacity in Baku ACC.
Cost‐efficiency: ‐
Operational efficiency: +++ Better operational efficiency through more efficient transfer of
responsibility.
Cooperation Activities: Testing activities with Rostov ongoing. Tbilisi is scheduled after.
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 24 Released Issue
5. Cooperation activities
FAB Co‐ordination 5.1.
Not applicable.
Regional cooperation 5.2.
Regional cooperation initiatives
There are no Regional Cooperation Initiatives to which Azerbaijan has joined.
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 25 Released Issue
6. Implementation Objectives Progress
State View 6.1.
Objective Progress per SESAR Key Feature
Note: The detailed table of links between Implementation Objectives and SESAR Key Features is available in Annex C.
Legend:
## % = Expected completion / % Progress = Implementation Objective timeline (different colour per KF)
100% = Objective completed = Completion beyond Implementation Objective timeline
Optimised ATM Network Services
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
AOM13.1 Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) handling
43%
AOM19.1 (PCP) ASM Support Tools to Support AFUA 0%
AOM19.2 (PCP) ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data 0%
‐
AOM19.3 (PCP) Full rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing
0%
‐
FCM01 Enhanced Tactical Flow Management Services 0%
FCM03 Collaborative Flight Planning 100%
FCM04.1 STAM Phase 1
n/a
FCM04.2 (PCP) STAM Phase 2
n/a
FCM05 (PCP) Interactive Rolling NOP 5%
FCM06 (PCP) Traffic Complexity Assessment 0%
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 26 Released Issue
Advanced Air Traffic Services
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
AOM21.1 (PCP) Direct Routing 10%
AOM21.2 (PCP) Free Route Airspace
n/a
AOP14 Remote Tower Services Local objective
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport 0%
ATC02.2 STCA En‐Route 100%
ATC02.8 Ground‐Based Safety Nets 75%
ATC02.9 Enhanced STCA for TMAs 0%
ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
n/a
ATC12.1 Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring
100%
ATC15.1 Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN
n/a
ATC15.2 (PCP) Arrival Management Extended to En‐route Airspace
n/a
ATC16 ACAS II Compliant with TCAS II Change 7.1 100%
ATC17 Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer
92%
ATC18 Multi Sector Planning En‐route ‐ 1P2T Local objective 0%
‐
ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
100%
ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations Local objective
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport 50%
ITY‐COTR Ground‐Ground Automated Co‐ordination Processes
68%
NAV03.1 RNAV 1 in TMA Operations 88%
NAV03.2 (PCP) RNP 1 in TMA Operations 0%
‐
NAV10 APV procedures 72%
NAV12 Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft
Local objective 0%
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 27 Released Issue
High Performing Airport Operations
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
AOP04.1 A‐SMGCS Level 1
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
100%
AOP04.2 A‐SMGCS Level 2
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
100%
AOP05 Airport CDM
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
n/a
AOP10 (PCP) Time‐Based Separation
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
n/a
AOP11 (PCP) Initial Airport Operations Plan
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
n/a
AOP12 (PCP) Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with ATC Clearances Monitoring
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
n/a
AOP13 (PCP) Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
n/a
ENV02 Collaborative Environmental Management
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
n/a
SAF11 Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions
100%
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 28 Released Issue
Enabling Aviation Infrastructure
<15 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
COM10 Migrate from AFTN to AMHS 100%
COM11 Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) 75%
COM12 (PCP) NewPENS
n/a
FCM08 (PCP) Extended Flight Plan 0%
INF04 Integrated Briefing 100%
INF07 Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) 48%
ITY‐ACID Aircraft Identification 100%
ITY‐ADQ Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information
83%
ITY‐AGDL Initial ATC Air‐Ground Data Link Services 10%
ITY‐AGVCS2 8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195
n/a
ITY‐FMTP Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol 100%
ITY‐SPI Surveillance Performance and Interoperability 100%
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 29 Released Issue
ICAO ASBU Implementation
The following table shows, for each of the ASBU Block 0 modules, the overall status, the final date foreseen for completion and the percentage of progress achieved in the current cycle.
These results were determined using the LSSIP Year 2017 declared statuses and progress of the relevant Implementation objectives in accordance with the mapping approved by ICAO EUR EANPG/59 (European Air Navigation Planning Group).
Legend:
= Completed (during 2017 or before)
= Missing planning date
= Progress achieved in 2017 = Not applicable
<16 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 ≥25
B0‐APTA Optimization of Approach Procedures including vertical guidance
100%
80%
B0‐SURF Safety and Efficiency of Surface Operations (A‐SMGCS Level 1‐2)
100%
B0‐FICE Increased Interoperability, Efficiency and Capacity through Ground‐Ground Integration
100%
87%
B0‐DATM Service Improvement through Digital Aeronautical Information Management
100%
92%
B0‐ACAS ACAS Improvements 100%
B0‐SNET Increased Effectiveness of Ground‐Based Safety Nets
100%
38%
B0‐ACDM Improved Airport Operations through
B0‐RSEQ Improved Traffic flow through Runway sequencing (AMAN/DMAN)
B0‐FRTO Improved Operations through Enhanced En‐Route Trajectories
100%
37%
B0‐NOPS Improved Flow Performance through Planning based on a Network‐Wide view
100%
50%
B0‐ASUR Initial capability for ground surveillance 100%
B0‐CDO Improved Flexibility and Efficiency in Descent Profiles (CDO)
100%
B0‐TBO Improved Safety and Efficiency through the initial application of Data Link En‐Route
100%
10%
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 30 Released Issue
Detailed Objectives Implementation progress 6.2.
Note: The detailed table of applicability area for the Implementation Objectives is available in Annex C.
Objective/Stakeholder Progress Code:
Completed No Plan
Ongoing Not Applicable
Planned Missing Data
Late
Main Objectives
AOM13.1
Harmonise Operational Air Traffic (OAT) and General Air Traffic (GAT) Handling Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
43% Ongoing
‐
New Air Rule on use of the airspace has been modified and approved by Cabinet of Ministry. Rules were developed in accordance with ICAO and EUROCONTROL requirements. New plans are being considered for further cooperation between CIV and MIL.
31/12/2018
REG (By:12/2018)
State Civil Aviation Administration
New Air Rule on use of the airspace has been modified and approved by Cabinet of Ministry. Rules developed in accordance with ICAO and EUROCONTROL requirements.New plans are being considered for further cooperation between CIV and MIL.
‐ 40%
Ongoing
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2018)
AZANS
New Air Rule on use of the airspace has been modified and approved by Cabinet of Ministry. Rules developed in accordance with ICAO and EUROCONTROL requirements. New plans are being considered for further cooperation between CIV and MIL.
‐ 63%
Ongoing
31/12/2018
MIL (By:12/2018)
Mil. Authority
New Air Rule on use of the airspace has been modified and approved by Cabinet of Ministry. Rules developed in accordance with ICAO and EUROCONTROL requirements. New plans are being considered for further cooperation between CIV and MIL.
‐ 32%
Ongoing
31/12/2018
AOM19.1
ASM Support Tools to Support Advanced FUA (AFUA) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
0% Planned
‐
Azerbaijan is currently building a new center that will include these functions. 01/07/2018
ASP (By:12/2018)
AZANS Azerbaijan is currently building a new center that will include these functions.
‐ 0% Planned
01/07/2018
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 31 Released Issue
AOM19.2
ASM Management of Real‐Time Airspace Data Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2017 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
0% No Plan
‐
Azerbaijan is currently not in a position to establish ASM management of real‐time airspace data at the European Network level. The objective will be reviewed in the future when circumstances change.
‐
ASP (By:12/2021)
AZANS
Azerbaijan is currently not in a position to establish ASM management of real‐time airspace data at the European Network level. The objective will be reviewed in the future when circumstances change.
‐ 0%
No Plan
‐
AOM19.3
Full Rolling ASM/ATFCM Process and ASM Information Sharing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2014 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
0% No Plan
‐
Azerbaijan is currently not in a position to establish rolling ASM/ATFCM process at the European Network level. The objective will be reviewed in the future when circumstances change.
‐
ASP (By:12/2021)
AZANS
Azerbaijan is currently not in a position to establish rolling ASM/ATFCM process at the European Network level. The objective will be reviewed in the future when circumstances change.
‐ 0%
No Plan
‐
AOM21.1
Direct Routing Timescales: Initial Operational Capability: 01/01/2015 Full Operational Capability: 31/12/2017
10% Late
‐
Azerbaijan is in the process of implementation of this objective. One direct route is already defined for testing. This is not reflected in ERNIP, it is AZANS project solely. In future, AZANS is looking for more cooperation with EUROCONTROL in this area. New Center of Airspace Efficiency, Strategy and Development should help in the promotion in this area.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2017)
AZANS Azerbaijan is in the process of implementation of this objective. One direct route is already defined for testing.
‐ 10% Late
31/12/2018
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 32 Released Issue
AOM21.2
Free Route Airspace (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
‐
At this stage, Azerbaijan is unable to implement this objective due to complexity of the airspace and issue of restricted flight zone at its territory.
‐
ASP (By:12/2021)
AZANS At this stage, Azerbaijan is unable to implement this objective due to complexity of the airspace and issue of restricted flight zone at its territory.
‐ % Not Applicable
‐
AOP04.1
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System A‐SMGCS Surveillance (former Level 1) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
100% Completed
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
Azerbaijan has completed the implementation of this objective and A‐SMGCS Level 1 is operational at Baku Airport.
31/12/2014
REG (By:12/2010)
State Civil Aviation Administration
Azerbaijan has completed the implementation of this objective and A‐SMGCS Level 1 is operational at Baku Airport.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2014
ASP (By:12/2011)
AZANS Azerbaijan has completed the implementation of this objective and A‐SMGCS Level 1 is operational at Baku Airport.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2014
APO (By:12/2010)
BAKU ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport
Azerbaijan has completed the implementation of this objective and A‐SMGCS Level 1 is operational at Baku Airport.
A‐SMGCS Level I and II
100%
Completed
31/12/2014
AOP04.2
Advanced Surface Movement Guidance and Control System (A‐SMGCS) Runway Monitoring and Conflict Alerting (RMCA) (former Level 2) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
100% Completed
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
A‐SMGCS Level 2 is implemented and operational at Baku Airport. Control function equipment installed. HITT system used.
31/12/2015
ASP (By:12/2017)
AZANS Azerbaijan has completed the implementation of this objective.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2015
APO (By:12/2017)
BAKU ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport
Azerbaijan has completed the implementation of this objective.
A‐SMGCS Level I and II
100%
Completed
31/12/2015
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 33 Released Issue
AOP05 Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A‐CDM) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
Azerbaijan is not within the area of applicability of this airport related objective. ‐
ASP (By:12/2016)
AZANS Azerbaijan is not within the area of applicability of this multi‐national objective.
‐ % Not Applicable
‐
APO (By:12/2016)
BAKU ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport
Azerbaijan is not within the area of applicability of this multi‐national objective.
‐ %
Not Applicable
‐
AOP10 Time‐Based Separation Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
Azerbaijan is not within the area of applicability of this objective. ‐
REG (By:12/2023)
AZANS ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:12/2023)
AZANS ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
AOP11 Initial Airport Operations Plan Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
Azerbaijan is not in the applicability area of the PCP regulation. ‐
ASP (By:12/2021)
AZANS Azerbaijan is not in the applicability area of the PCP regulation.
‐ % Not Applicable
‐
APO (By:12/2021)
BAKU ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport
Azerbaijan is not in the applicability area of the PCP regulation.
‐ %
Not Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 34 Released Issue
AOP12
Improve Runway and Airfield Safety with Conflicting ATC Clearances (CATC) Detection and Conformance Monitoring Alerts for Controllers (CMAC) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
Azerbaijan is not in the applicability area of the PCP regulation. ‐
ASP (By:12/2020)
AZANS ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
APO (By:12/2020)
BAKU ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport
‐ ‐ %
Not Applicable
‐
AOP13
Automated Assistance to Controller for Surface Movement Planning and Routing Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
Baku Airport is not in applicability area of this objective. ‐
REG (By:12/2023)
State Civil Aviation Administration
‐ ‐ %
Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:12/2023)
AZANS ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
ATC02.8
Ground‐Based Safety Nets Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2009 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
75% Late
‐
MSAW and APW functions are fully implemented in AZANS. APM implementation is currently ongoing.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2016)
AZANS MSAW and APW functions are fully implemented in AZANS. APM implementation is currently ongoing.
‐ 75% Late
31/12/2018
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 35 Released Issue
ATC02.9
Enhanced Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) for TMAs Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020
0% Planned
‐
‐ 31/12/2020
ASP (By:12/2020)
AZANS ‐ ‐ 0% Planned
31/12/2020
ATC07.1 AMAN Tools and Procedures Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
Azerbaijan is not within the area of applicability of this multi‐national objective. Moreover, there is no OPS need. However implementation of AMAN system is discussed in the frame of existing modernization programme.
‐
ASP (By:12/2019)
AZANS No OPS needs, the investment can not be justified Installation of new ATC system
% Not Applicable
‐
ATC12.1
Automated Support for Conflict Detection, Resolution Support Information and Conformance Monitoring Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2015 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
100% Completed
‐
MTCD support function exists in the system. CORA function implemented. Procedures are defined. Functionality is operational.
31/12/2017
ASP (By:12/2021)
AZANS MTCD support function exists in the system. Procedures are defined. Functionality is operational.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2017
ATC15.1
Information Exchange with En‐route in Support of AMAN (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
‐
There is no operational need for this tool in Azerbaijan. ‐
ASP (By:12/2017)
AZANS ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 36 Released Issue
ATC15.2
Arrival Management Extended to En‐route Airspace (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
‐
Not applicable for AZ. ‐
ASP (By:12/2023)
AZANS ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
ATC17
Electronic Dialogue as Automated Assistance to Controller during Coordination and Transfer Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
92% Ongoing
‐
New ATM system is capable to exchange some OLDI messages. AZANS is in negotiations with adjacent countries. Testing is ongoing with Rostov FIR.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2018)
AZANS New ATM system is capable to exchange basic OLDI messages. AZANS is in negotiations with adjacent countries. Testing is ongoing with Rostov FIR.
OLDI system implementati
on.
92% Ongoing
31/12/2018
COM10
Migrate from AFTN to AMHS Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/12/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2018
100% Completed
‐
Azerbaijan completed the transition to AMHS. System capabilities implemented into the new ACC. However, due to inability of adjacent Rostov FIR system is still working as AFTN.
31/12/2014
ASP (By:12/2018)
AZANS
Azerbaijan completed the transition to AMHS. System capabilities implemented into the new ACC. However, due to inability of adjacent Rostov FIR system is still working as AFTN.
Installation of new ATC system
100%
Completed
31/12/2014
COM11
Voice over Internet Protocol (VoIP) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2020
75% Ongoing
‐
AZANS has partly implemented this objective. In some areas the concept is already operational. 31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2020)
AZANS AZANS has partly implemented this objective. In some areas the concept is already operational.
Installation of new ATC system
75% Ongoing
31/12/2018
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 37 Released Issue
COM12
New Pan‐European Network Service (NewPENS) (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
‐
‐ ‐
ASP (By:12/2024)
AZANS ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
APO (By:12/2024)
ENV01 Continuous Descent Operations (CDO) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
100% Completed
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
Procedures developed to decrease C02 emissions at Baku Airport and published. Objective is completed.
31/03/2015
ASP (By:12/2013)
AZANS Procedures developed to decrease C02 emissions at Baku Airport and published. Objective is completed.
‐ 100% Completed
31/03/2015
APO (By:12/2013)
BAKU ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport
Procedures developed to decrease C02 emissions at Baku Airport and published. Objective is completed.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/03/2015
ENV02 Airport Collaborative Environmental Management Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport (Outside Applicability Area)
Azerbaijan is not within the area of applicability of this airport related objective. ‐
ASP (By:12/2016)
AZANS Azerbaijan is not within the area of applicability of this multi‐national objective.
‐ % Not Applicable
‐
APO (By:12/2016)
BAKU ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport
Azerbaijan is not within the area of applicability of this multi‐national objective.
‐ %
Not Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 38 Released Issue
FCM03
Collaborative Flight Planning Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2000 Full operational capability: 31/12/2017
100% Completed
‐
Since early January 2016, associations with IFPS is completed and operational. AIC distributed . All messages exchanged through the system to the extent necessary for AZ being a non EUROCONTROL State.
31/12/2017
ASP (By:12/2017)
AZANS Since early January 2016, associations with IFPS is completed and operational. AIC distributed . All messages exchanged through the system.
Implementation of IFPLS
100% Completed
31/12/2017
FCM04.1
Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 1 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
‐
Azerbaijan is not in the applicability area of this objective. ‐
ASP (By:10/2017)
AZANS Azerbaijan is not in the applicability area of this objective. ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
FCM04.2
Short Term ATFCM Measures (STAM) ‐ Phase 2 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
‐
Not applicable for AZ. Not in the applicability area. ‐
ASP (By:12/2021)
AZANS ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 39 Released Issue
FCM05
Interactive Rolling NOP Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
5% Ongoing
‐
Objective is planned to be implemented in future with new ATFCM center in Baku. Activity is started already with provision of airport slot info to DDR.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2021)
AZANS Objective is planned to be implemented in future with new ATFCM center in Baku.
Implementation of
Airspace Efficiency, Strategy and Development Center (ASEC)
0%
Planned
31/12/2018
APO (By:12/2021)
BAKU ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport
Objective implementation started. To be implemented in relations to new ATFCM center in Baku.
‐ 10%
Ongoing
31/12/2018
FCM06
Traffic Complexity Assessment (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
0% Planned
‐
The objective is being considered for implementation in new flow and capacity management center in Baku.
31/12/2021
ASP (By:12/2021)
AZANS The objective is being considered for implementation in new flow and capacity management center in Baku.
Implementation of
Airspace Efficiency, Strategy and Development Center (ASEC)
0%
Planned
31/12/2021
FCM08
Extended Flight Plan Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2016 Full operational capability: 31/12/2021
0% Planned
‐
The objective will be implemented in new flow and capacity management center in Baku. 31/12/2021
ASP (By:12/2021)
AZANS The objective will be implemented in new flow and capacity management center in Baku.
Implementation of
Airspace Efficiency, Strategy and Development Center (ASEC)
0%
Planned
31/12/2021
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 40 Released Issue
INF07
Electronic Terrain and Obstacle Data (eTOD) Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/11/2014 Full operational capability: 31/05/2018
48% Late
‐
Implementation of e‐TOD was approved by State Civil Aviation Administration. Implementation is considered as part of implementation of ADQ requirements.
31/12/2018
REG (By:05/2018)
State Civil Aviation Administration
Implementation of e‐TOD was approved by State Civil Aviation Administration. Implementation is considered as part of implementation of ADQ requirements.
‐ 55%
Late
31/12/2018
ASP (By:05/2018)
AZANS Implementation of e‐TOD was approved by State Civil Aviation Administration. Implementation is considered as part of implementation of ADQ requirements.
Implementation of
complete AIS to AIM system
40%
Late
31/12/2018
APO (By:05/2018)
BAKU ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport
Implementation of e‐TOD was approved by State Civil Aviation Administration. Implementation is considered as part of implementation of ADQ requirements.
‐ 40%
Late
31/12/2018
ITY‐ACID
Aircraft Identification (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
100% Completed
‐
Azerbaijan ATM system support this functionality. Mode S is implemented, it functions. No declaration of Mode S is provided to NM, as AZ is not EUROCONTROL State.
31/12/2014
ASP (By:01/2020)
AZANS Azerbaijan ATM system support this functionality.
Mode S implementati
on / The second phase of installation of ADS‐B and WAM system
100%
Completed
31/12/2014
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 41 Released Issue
ITY‐ADQ
Ensure Quality of Aeronautical Data and Aeronautical Information (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
83% Ongoing
‐
Although not applicable to AZ, there are plans and activities towards the implementation of ADQ in AZ. AZANS AIS is ISO 9001/2008 Certified by DQS. Gap analyses for ITY‐ADQ requirements implementation is done. Roadmap for implementation is established.
31/12/2018
REG (By:06/2017)
State Civil Aviation Administration
AZANS AIS is ISO 9001/2008 Certified by DQS. Gap analyses for ITY‐ADQ requirements implementation is done.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2015
ASP (By:06/2017)
AZANS
Although not applicable to AZ, there are plans and activities towards the implementation of ADQ in AZ. AZANS AIS is ISO 9001/2008 Certified by DQS. Gap analyses for ITY‐ADQ requirements implementation is done. Roadmap for implementation is established.
Implementation of
complete AIS to AIM system /
Installation of METEO radars
75%
Ongoing
31/12/2018
APO (By:06/2017)
BAKU ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport
Airport AIS handled by AZANS. ‐ %
Not Applicable
‐
ITY‐AGDL
Initial ATC Air‐Ground Data Link Services (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
10% Ongoing
‐
Azerbaijan is not within the area of applicability of this EU+ objective. New ATC Centre includes CPDLC functionality. Connection to SITA to be performed in the future.
31/12/2018
REG (By:02/2018)
State Civil Aviation Administration
Azerbaijan is not within the area of applicability of this EU+ objective. New ATC Centre includes CPDLC functionality. Connection to SITA to be performed in the future.
‐ 0%
Planned
01/02/2018
ASP (By:02/2018)
AZANS
Azerbaijan is not within the area of applicability of this EU+ objective. New ATC Centre includes CPDLC functionality. Connection to SITA to be performed in the future.
‐ 13%
Ongoing
31/12/2018
MIL (By:01/2019)
Mil. Authority ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 42 Released Issue
ITY‐AGVCS2
8,33 kHz Air‐Ground Voice Channel Spacing below FL195 (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
% Not
Applicable
‐
Azerbaijan is not in the applicability area of this objective. ‐
REG (By:12/2018)
State Civil Aviation Administration
‐ ‐ %
Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:12/2018)
AZANS ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
MIL (By:12/2020)
Mil. Authority ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
APO (By:12/2018)
BAKU ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport
‐ ‐ %
Not Applicable
‐
ITY‐FMTP
Common Flight Message Transfer Protocol (FMTP) Timescales: Entry into force of regulation: 28/06/2007 All EATMN systems put into service after 01/01/09: 01/01/2009 All EATMN systems in operation by 20/04/11: 20/04/2011 Transitional arrangements: 31/12/2012 Transitional arrangements when bilaterally agreed between ANSPs: 31/12/2014
100% Completed
‐
Functionality completed. FMTP is based on the TCP/IP protocol, IPv4. 31/12/2015
ASP (By:12/2014)
AZANS Functionality completed. FMTP is based on the TCP/IP protocol, IPv4.
‐ 100% Completed
31/12/2015
MIL (By:12/2014)
Mil. Authority Mil systems are not interconnected with Civil ATC. One position of Baku ATC system is dedicated for Mil sector at Baku ACC.
‐ % Not Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 43 Released Issue
ITY‐SPI
Surveillance Performance and Interoperability (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
100% Completed
‐
ATC systems is procured from EUROPEAN famous suppliers and correspond to EUROCAE requirements. Airborn equipment or modification is subject to EASA certification. Surveillance data exchanged in ASTERIX format. All actions completed. AZ is not in the applicability area ‐ voluntary implementation.
31/12/2015
REG (By:02/2015)
State Civil Aviation Administration
ATC systems is procured from EUROPEAN famous suppliers and correspond to EUROCAE. Airborn equipment or modification is subject to EASA certification. REG action completed.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2015
ASP (By:02/2015)
AZANS
ATC systems is procured from EUROPEAN famous suppliers and correspond to EUROCAE. All data processing is in ICAO standarts. UTC time coordination is obtained by GPS time systems. ASTERIX formats used (ASTERIX 62, 19, 20, etc.)
MSSR Radar installation at
Yevlakh Airport / Mode S
implementation / The
second phase of installation of ADS‐B and WAM system
100%
Completed
31/12/2015
MIL (By:06/2020)
Mil. Authority ‐ ‐ % Not Applicable
‐
NAV03.1
RNAV 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023
88% Ongoing
‐
RNAV procedures were approved by SCAA. RNAV arrival and departure procedures are used only in Baku for RNAV approved aircraft. RNAV procedures for other international airports in AZ are ongoing to develop.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2023)
AZANS The P‐RNAV procedures were tested in a Baku terminal area. New P‐RNAV procedures now are used for arrival and departure for all RWY.
‐ 88% Ongoing
31/12/2018
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 44 Released Issue
NAV03.2
RNP 1 in TMA Operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2018 Full operational capability: 31/12/2023
0% No Plan
‐
‐ ‐
ASP (By:12/2023)
AZANS ‐ ‐ 0% No Plan
‐
NAV10
APV Procedures Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/06/2011 Full operational capability: 31/12/2016
72% Late
‐
RNP BARO procedure implemented for one runway end at Baku Airport. It is planned to develop procedures for all runway ends by the end of the year.
31/12/2018
REG (By:04/2016)
State Civil Aviation Administration
AZ is out of EASA remit. However, many standards have been applied.
‐ %
Not Applicable
‐
ASP (By:12/2016)
AZANS RNP BARO procedure implemented for one runway end at Baku Airport. It is planned to develop procedures for all runway ends by the end of 2017.
‐ 72% Late
31/12/2018
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 45 Released Issue
SAF11
Improve Runway Safety by Preventing Runway Excursions Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/09/2013 Full operational capability: 31/01/2018
100% Completed
‐
Azerbaijan has implemented technical measures to prevent runway excursions. The aerodrome service unit is responsible for runway safety issues. The activities of this unit are closely coordinated with other services. A Special team is organised for runway incursion and all objectives have been met.
31/12/2015
REG (By:01/2018)
State Civil Aviation Administration
Azerbaijan has implemented technical measures to prevent runway excursions. The aerodrome service unit is responsible for runway safety issues. The activities of this unit are closely coordinated with other services. A Special team is organised for runway incursion and all objectives have been met.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2015
ASP (By:12/2014)
AZANS
Azerbaijan has implemented technical measures to prevent runway excursions. The aerodrome service unit is responsible for runway safety issues. The activities of this unit are closely coordinated with other services. A Special team is organised for runway incursion and all objectives have been met.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2015
APO (By:12/2014)
BAKU ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport
Azerbaijan has implemented technical measures to prevent runway excursions. The aerodrome service unit is responsible for runway safety issues. The activities of this unit are closely coordinated with other services. A Special team is organised for runway incursion and all objectives have been met.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2015
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 46 Released Issue
Additional Objectives for ICAO ASBU Monitoring
ATC02.2
Implement ground based safety nets ‐ Short Term Conflict Alert (STCA) ‐ level 2 for en‐route operations Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/01/2008 Full operational capability: 31/01/2013
100% Completed
‐
STCA functions exist and are optimised to the local environment. Existing system has STCA functions. Review of new EUROCONTROL specifications was done during 2010. NEW ATC Centre and ATC Tower has been built and new Modern ATC equipment were installed. Specification has done according to the later EUROCONTROL Requirements. Nowadays New system is working. ATS personnel use new SIDs and STARs.
30/11/2014
ASP (By:01/2013)
AZANS
STCA functions exist and are optimised to the local environment. Existing system has STCA functions. Review of new EUROCONTROL specifications was done during 2010. NEW ATC Centre and ATC Tower has been built and new Modern ATC equipment were installed. Specification has done according to the later EUROCONTROL Requirements. Nowadays New system is working. ATS personnel use new SIDs and STARs
‐ 100%
Completed
30/11/2014
ATC16
Implement ACAS II compliant with TCAS II change 7.1 Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/03/2012 Full operational capability: 31/12/2015
100% Completed
‐
All aircraft, in accordance with the plan were equipped with TCAS Version 7.1. AZANS system is capable of ACAS II performance monitoring.
31/12/2015
REG (By:12/2015)
State Civil Aviation Administration
All aircraft, in accordance with the plan were equipped with TCAS Version 7.1
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2015
ASP (By:03/2012)
AZANS
AZANS systen is capable to perform ACAS II performance monitoring. Acquisition information about TCAS II version 7.1and develop training plan to train ATCO in ACAS II (TCAS II version 7.1) has been completed.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/12/2015
MIL (By:12/2015)
Mil. Authority
MIL has no ATS role. ‐ % Not
Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 47 Released Issue
FCM01
Implement enhanced tactical flow management services Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/08/2001 Full operational capability: 31/12/2006
0% Planned
‐
Azerbaijan is planning to build new airspace flow efficiency center which will implement tools to enhance tactical flow management. Bilateral agreement with EUROCONTROL addressing ATFCM issues signed in 2015. Status is planned (not LATE) as Azerbaijan was unable to implement this objective earlier as there was no basis to be in the scope of CFMU.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:07/2014)
AZANS
Azerbaijan has built new airspace flow efficiency center which will implement tools to enhance tactical flow management. Bilateral agreement with EUROCONTROL addressing ATFCM issues signed in 2015. Status is planned as Azerbaijan was unable to implement this objective earlier as there was no basis to be in the scope of CFMU.
‐ 0%
Planned
31/12/2018
INF04
Implement integrated briefing Timescales: Initial operational capability: 01/07/2002 Full operational capability: 31/12/2012
100% Completed
‐
Integrated briefing is implemented and operational at Baku Heydar Aliyev Airport. AZANS currently implementing self briefing automated system at Baku Heydar Aliyev Airport.
31/01/2012
ASP (By:12/2012)
AZANS
Integrated briefing is implemented and operational at Baku Heydar Aliyev airport. AZANS currently implementing self briefing automated system at Baku Heydar Aliyev airport.
‐ 100%
Completed
31/01/2012
ITY‐COTR
Implementation of ground‐ground automated co‐ordination processes (Outside Applicability Area) Timescales: ‐ not applicable ‐
68% Ongoing
‐
OLDI is installed in AIRCON system. The Installation of OLDI system continue in the adjacent Centers. Communication through the OLDI system between Baku and Rostov is in test mode.
31/12/2018
ASP (By:12/2012)
AZANS
OLDI is installed in AIRCON system. The Installation of OLDI system continue in the adjacent Centers. Communication through the OLDI system between Baku and Rostov is in test mode.
‐ 68%
Ongoing
31/12/2018
MIL (By:12/2012)
Mil. Authority
Azerbaijan is outside of the applicability of this objective.
‐ % Not
Applicable
‐
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 48 Released Issue
Local Objectives
AOP14 Remote Tower Services Applicability and timescale: Local
0% Planned
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport
It is planned to create a virtual tower on the island of Chilov in the Caspian Sea for helicopter operations. Note that this Objective refers to Chilov heliport and not Baku airport, which was selected because Chilov was not in our database.
31/12/2018
ATC18 Multi‐Sector Planning En‐route ‐ 1P2T Applicability and timescale: Local
% No Plan
‐
‐ ‐
ENV03 Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Applicability and timescale: Local
50% Ongoing
UBBB ‐ Baku ‐ Heydar Aliyev International Airport
SIDs PBN has been developed and implemented in the practical at the airport Heydar Aliyev. RNAV arrival and departure procedures are used for P‐RNAV approved aircraft and for all RWY. Training programs are being developed and will be implemented after approved by SCAA.
31/12/2018
NAV12 Optimised Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA for Rotorcraft Applicability and timescale: Local
% Ongoing
‐
Low‐Level IFR Routes in TMA are developed and will be published in the local AIP 31/12/2018
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 49 Released Issue
ANNEXES
ANNEX A ‐ Specialists involved in the LSSIP Process
LSSIP Co‐ordination
LSSIP Focal Points Organisation Name
LSSIP Focal Point for Azerbaijan AZANS Alexander TELEGIN
LSSIP Focal Point for ANSP AZANS Agabek BALABEKOV
EUROCONTROL LSSIP Support
Function Directorate Name
LSSIP Contact Person for Azerbaijan DECMA/PRM Predrag VRANJKOVIC
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 50 Released Issue
Implementation Objectives
Implementation Objective
EUROCONTROL PEPR Objective Coordinator
EUROCONTROL Objective Owners
National Stakeholder Specialist
AOM13.1 A. DYBOWSKA O. MROWICKI/ C. LUCCIOLI Vahid GADIROV
AOM19.1 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA /
O. MROWICKI
AOM19.2 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA /
O. MROWICKI
AOM19.3 O. ALFARO G. ACAMPORA /
O. MROWICKI
AOM21.1 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN Vahid GADIROV
AOM21.2 A. DYBOWSKA C. BRAIN Vahid GADIROV
AOP04.1 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Safa MAMMADOV
AOP04.2 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM Safa MAMMADOV
AOP05 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE
AOP10 F. ROOSELEER R. GRAHAM
AOP11 F. ROOSELEER M. BIRENHEIDE
AOP12 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM
AOP13 P. VRANJKOVIC R. GRAHAM
AOP14 A. DYBOWSKA R. GRAHAM / G. ASSIRE
ATC02.8 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI
ATC02.9 F. ROOSELEER S. DROZDOWSKI
ATC07.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending
ATC12.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending
ATC15.1 L. DELL’ORTO pending
ATC15.2 L. DELL’ORTO P. HOP
ATC17 L. DELL’ORTO S. MORTON
ATC18 L. DELL’ORTO I. PENDACHANSKI
COM10 J. PINTO Y. EYUBOGLU Safa MAMMADOV
COM11 J. PINTO L. POPESCU Safa MAMMADOV
COM12 J. PINTO W. JANSSENS
ENV01 B. HILL D. BRAIN Aleksandr ESTROV
ENV02 B. HILL S. MAHONY
ENV03 A‐P. FRANGOLHO D. BRAIN
FCM03 O. CIOARA C. BOUMAN/I. PENDACHANSKI
Farhan GULIYEV
FCM04.1 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI
FCM04.2 I. MARCETIC P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI
FCM05 O. CIOARA I. MENDES VIDEIRA/I. PENDACHANSKI
Farhan GULIYEV
FCM06 F. ROOSELEER P. HOP/I. PENDACHANSKI Farhan GULIYEV
FCM08 O. CIOARA K. BREIVIK/I. PENDACHANSKI Farhan GULIYEV
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 51 Released Issue
INF07 A‐P. FRANGOLHO A. PETROVSKY Aleksandr ESTROV
ITY‐ACID O. CIOARA pending Safa MAMMADOV
ITY‐ADQ A‐P. FRANGOLHO M. UNTERREINER Julia DRONOVA
ITY‐AGDL B. HILL D. ISAAC Safa MAMMADOV
ATY‐AGVCS2 B. HILL J. POUZET Safa MAMMADOV
ITY‐FMTP O. ALFARO L. POPESCU Safa MAMMADOV
ITY‐SPI O. CIOARA M. BORELY Safa MAMMADOV
NAV03.1 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC
NAV03.2 I. MARCETIC F. PAVLICEVIC
NAV10 I. MARCETIC R. FARNWORTH Aleksandr ESTROV
NAV12 I. MARCETIC B. RABILLER / F. RIQUET
SAF11 F. ROOSELEER pending Alexander TELEGIN
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 52 Released Issue
ANNEX B ‐ National Stakeholders Organisation charts
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 53 Released Issue
AZANS Organisation Chart
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 54 Released Issue
Azerbaijan state inspectorate on Civil Aviation Flight Safety
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 55 Released Issue
ANNEX C – Implementation Objectives’ Applicability
Objective SESAR
Key Feature
ICAO ASBU
B0 European ATM Masterplan Level 3 Applicability area
AOM13.1
‐ All ECAC States except Albania, Latvia, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and
Moldova.
AOM19.1
B0‐FRTO All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Malta, Luxembourg, and
Moldova
AOM19.2
‐ All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova
AOM19.3
‐ All ECAC States except Armenia, Luxembourg and Moldova
AOM21.1
B0‐FRTO 25 ECAC States
AOM21.2
‐ All ECAC States except Azerbaijan, Belgium, Luxembourg and the
Netherlands
AOP04.1
B0‐SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non‐PCP airports
AOP04.2
B0‐SURF 25 PCP airports, 22 non‐PCP airports
AOP05
B0‐ACDM 25 PCP airports, 21 non‐PCP airports
AOP10
‐ 16 PCP Airports
AOP11
‐ 24 PCP airports, 15 non‐PCP airports
AOP12
‐ 25 PCP airports
AOP13
‐ 25 PCP airports
AOP14
‐ Local: Low to medium complexity aerodromes, subject to local needs
ATC02.2 B0‐SNET Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all ECAC States that did
not yet implement it
ATC02.8
B0‐SNET All ECAC States except the Netherlands
ATC02.9
B0‐SNET TMAs, according to local business needs
ATC07.1
B0‐RSEQ 23 PCP Airports, 8 non‐PCP airports
ATC12.1
‐ All ECAC States except Luxembourg
ATC15.1
B0‐RSEQ
EU States except Cyprus, Greece, Lithuania, Luxembourg, Malta, Slovak
Republic, Slovenia. Plus: Bosnia and Herzegovina, Maastricht UAC,
Norway, Switzerland, Turkey
ATC15.2
‐ ACCs within the extended AMAN horizon, including those adjacent to
TMAs serving/associated to PCP airports
ATC16 B0‐ACAS Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that
did not yet implement it
ATC17
B0‐FICE All ECAC States except Ireland, Slovak Republic and Ukraine
ATC18
‐ Local: Subject to local needs and complexity
COM10
‐ All ECAC States
COM11
‐ All ECAC States
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 56 Released Issue
COM12
‐
‐ Area 1 (ANSPs signatories of the NewPENS Common Procurement
Agreement): 33 ANSPs
‐ Area 2 (Other stakeholders): Stakeholders from all ECAC States not part
of Area 1
ENV01
B0‐CDO 59 Airports
ENV02
‐ 47 Airports
ENV03
B0‐CCO Local: Aerodromes subject to local needs and complexity
FCM01 B0‐NOPS Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that
did not yet implement it
FCM03
B0‐NOPS All ECAC States
FCM04.1
B0‐NOPS Austria, Belgium, Croatia, Czech Republic, France, Germany, Italy, Poland,
Spain, Switzerland
FCM04.2
B0‐NOPS All EU+ States
FCM05
B0‐NOPS All ECAC States except Armenia, FYROM, Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC
and Moldova
FCM06
B0‐NOPS All EU+ States
FCM07
‐ All EU+ States
FCM08
‐ All ECAC States
FCM09
‐ All ECAC States
INF04 B0‐DATM Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable to all ECAC States that
did not yet implement it
INF07
‐ All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC
INF08.1
‐ All EU+ States
INF08.2
‐ All EU+ States
ITY‐ACID
‐ All EU+ States
ITY‐ADQ
B0‐DATM All EU+ States except FYROM, Georgia and Maastricht UAC
ITY‐AGDL
B0‐TBO All EU+ States except Georgia, Luxembourg and Netherlands
ITY‐AGVCS2
‐ All EU+ States except Georgia and Moldova
ITY‐COTR B0‐FICE Additional for ICAO ASBU monitoring: applicable all EU+ States that did
not yet implement it
ITY‐FMTP
B0‐FICE All ECAC States
ITY‐SPI
B0‐ASUR All EU+ States
NAV03.1
B0‐CDO,
B0‐CCO All ECAC States except Luxembourg, Maastricht UAC and Slovak Republic
NAV03.2
‐ Mandatory for TMAs listed in section 1.2.1 of the Annex of the PCP
Regulation. For all other ECAC TMAs, according to local business needs
NAV10
B0‐APTA All ECAC States except Maastricht UAC
NAV12
‐ Local: TMAs subject to local needs and complexity
SAF11
‐ All ECAC States except Malta
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 57 Released Issue
Legend:
Objective’s link to SESAR Key Feature:
Optimised ATM Network Services
High Performing Airport Operations
Advanced Air Traffic Services
Enabling Aviation Infrastructure
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 58 Released Issue
ANNEX D ‐ Glossary of Abbreviations
This Annex mostly shows only the Abbreviations that are specific to the LSSIP Azerbaijan.
Other general abbreviations are in the Acronyms and Abbreviations document in http://www.eurocontrol.int/articles/glossaries
Term Description
ACAS Airborne Collision Avoidance System
ACC Area Control Centre
AIS Aeronautical Information Services
AMC Acceptable means of Compliance
ANS Air Navigation Services
ANSP ANS Provider
AOP Airports Operations (Domain)
APV Approach with Vertical Guidance
ARN ATS Route Network
ATS Air Traffic Services
CAD Civil Aviation Department
CDM Collaborative Decision Making
CNS Communications, Navigation and Surveillance
COM Communications
CTR Control Zone
DFL Division Flight Level
EAD European AIS Database
eAIP European Aeronautical Information Publication
EATM European Air Traffic Management
ECAC European Civil Aviation Conference
ESARR EUROCONTROL Safety Regulation Requirement
ESP European Safety Programme
FDP Flight Data Processing
FIR Flight Information Region
FL Flight Level
FSQA Flight Safety and Quality Assurance
FUA Flexible Use of Airspace
GBAS Ground Based Augmentation System
GNSS Global Navigation Satellite System
HRS Human Resources
HUM Human (Domain)
IFPS Initial Flight‐plan Processing System
LSSIP Year 2017 Azerbaijan 59 Released Issue
IFR Instrument Flight Rules
ISO International Standards Organisation
JAA Joint Aviation Authorities
kHz Kilohertz
LoA Letters of Agreement
MIL Military
NAV Navigation
NM Nautical Mile
NOTAM Notice To Airmen
OLDI On Line Data Interchange
OPS Operations
PSR Primary Surveillance Radar
QMS Quality Management System
REG Regulatory Authorities
RNP Required Navigation Performance
RVSM Reduced Vertical Separation Minimum
SAN Sakaeronavigatsia Ltd (ATM of Georgia)
SBAS Satellite‐Based augmentation systems (SBAS)
SLOA Stakeholder Line of Action
SMQS Safety Management and Quality System
SMS Safety Management System
SRC Safety Regulation Commission
SSR Secondary Surveillance Radar
STCA Short Term Conflict Alert
SUR Surveillance (Domain)
TMA Terminal Manoeuvring Area; Terminal Control Area