Lenin & Stalin
Presentation created by Robert MartinezPrimary Content Source: Prentice Hall World HistoryImages as cited.
historicalwallpapers.blogspot.com
Lenin’s first years as leader of Russia had been occupied in putting down civil war. Once the communist victory and his personal power
secure, he turned to the enormous problem of rebuilding a state and an economy that had
been shattered by World War I, two revolutions, and years of civil war.
russiapedia.rt.com
In 1922, the Communists produced a constitution that seemed
democratic and socialist. It set up an elected legislature, later called the Supreme Soviet, and gave all
citizens over 18 the right to vote. All political power, resources, and
means of production would belong to workers and peasants. The new government united much of the old
Russian empire in the Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, or
Soviet Union.www.gettyimages.com
The Soviet Union was a multinational state made up of European and Asian peoples. In theory, all the member republics shared
certain equal rights. Reality, however, differed greatly from theory in the Soviet Union. The Communist party, not the people, reigned
supreme. Like the Russian czars, the party used the army and secret police to enforce its will. Russia, which was the largest
republic, dominated the other republics.
www.departments.bucknell.edu
On the economic front, Lenin retreated from his
policy of “war communism,” which had brought the economy to
near collapse. Under party control, factory and
mine output had fallen. Peasants stopped
producing gain, knowing it would only be seized by
the government.www.dipity.com
In 1921, Lenin adopted the New Economic Policy. It allowed some capitalist ventures. Although the state
kept control of banks, foreign trade, and large industries, small businesses were allowed to reopen
for private profit. The government also stopped squeezing peasants for grain. Under the NEP, peasants
held on to small plots of land and freely sold their surplus crops.
community.middlebury.edu
Lenin’s compromise with capitalism helped the Soviet economy recover and ended armed resistance to the
new government. By 1928, food and industrial production climbed back to prewar levels. The
standard of living improved, too. But Lenin always saw the NEP as just a temporary retreat from communism. His successor would soon put the Soviet Union back
on the road to “pure” communism.
www.soviethistory.org
Lenin’s sudden death in 1924 set off a power struggle among Communist leaders. The chief contenders were Trotsky and Joseph Stalin.
Trotsky was a brilliant Marxist thinker, a skillful speaker, and an architect of the Bolshevik
Revolution.
www.ebay.com
Stalin, by contrast, was
neither a scholar nor an orator. He was, however, a shrewd political
operator and behind-the-
scenes organizer.
history1900s.about.com
Stalin was born Joseph Djugashvili to a poor family in Georgia, a region in the Caucasus Mountains. As a
boy, he studied for the priesthood. But his growing
interest in revolution brought him under the
seminary’s harsh discipline. Once, he was confined to a punishment cell for reading
a novel about the French Revolution.
commons.wikimedia.org
By 1900, Djugashvili had joined the Bolshevik underground and had taken the name Stalin, meaning “man of steel.” He organized robberies to get
money for the party and spent time in prison and in Siberian exile. He played a far less important role in the revolution and the civil war than did Trotsky. But in the
1920s, he became general secretary of the party. He used that position to build a loyal group of Communist
officials who owed their jobs to him.
commons.wikimedia.org
As early as 1922, Lenin had expressed grave doubts about Stalin’s ambitious nature: “Comrade Stalin…has concentrated an enormous power in his hands, and I
am not sure that he always knows how to use that power with sufficient caution.” To Lenin, Stalin was
“too rude.” Lenin urged the party to choose a successor “more tolerant, more loyal, more polite, and
more considerate to comrades.”
www.history.com
At Lenin’s death, Trotsky and Stalin jockeyed for position. They differed on most issues, including the future of communism. Trotsky, a firm Marxist, urged
support for a worldwide revolution against capitalism. Stalin took a more cautious view. Efforts to foster
Marxist revolutions in Europe after World War I had failed. Instead, he wanted to concentrate on building
socialism at home first.
www.guardian.co.uk
With political cunning, Stalin put his own supporters into top jobs and isolated Trotsky
within the party. Stripped of party membership, Trotsky fled the country in 1929. Still, he
continued to criticize Stalin. In 1940, Trotsky
was murdered in Mexico by a Stalinist agent.
www.chinaworker.info
Once in power, Stalin set out to make the Soviet Union into a modern industrial power. In
the past, said Stalin, Russia had suffered defeats because of its economic
backwardness. In 1928, he proposed the first of several “five-year plans” aimed at building
heavy industry, improving transportation, and
increasing farm output.
/isemodernworldhistorygrade9.wikispaces.com
To achieve this growth, he brought all economic activity under government control. The Soviet Union
developed a command economy, in which government officials made all basic economic decisions. Under Stalin, the government owned all businesses and
allocated financial and other resources. By contrast, in a capitalist economy, the free market controls most
economic decisions. Businesses are privately owned
and operated by individuals for profits.
shsstalinandredarmy.wikispaces.com
Stalin’s five-year plans set high production goals, especially for heavy industry and transportation. The government pushed workers and managers to meet
these goals by giving bonuses to those who succeeded, and by punishing those who did not.
Between 1928 and 1939, large factories, hydroelectric power stations, and huge industrial complexes rose
across the Soviet Union. Oil, coal, and steel production
grew. Mining expanded, and new railroads were built.
www.soviethistory.org
Despite the impressive progress in some areas, Soviet workers had little to show for their sacrifices. Some former peasants did improve their lives, becoming
skilled factory workers or managers. Overall, standards of living remained poor. Wages were low,
and consumer goods were scarce. Also, central planning was often inefficient, causing shortages in
several areas and surpluses in others.
brokenworld.wikispaces.com
Many managers, concerned only with meeting production quotas, turned out large quantities of low-
quality goods. During and after the Stalin era, the Soviet Union continued to do well in heavy industry,
such as the production of farm machinery. However, its planned economy failed to match that of the capitalist
world in making consumer goods such as clothing,
cars, and refrigerators.
www.artic.edu
Stalin also brought agriculture under government control. Under the NEP, peasants had held on to small plots of land. But Stalin
saw that system as being inefficient and a threat to state power. He forced peasants to give up their private plots and live on either
state-owned farms or collectives, large farms owned and operated by peasants as a group.
www.artic.edu
Peasants were permitted to keep their houses and personal belongings, but all farm animals and implements were to be turned over to the
collective. The state set all prices and controlled access to farm supplies.
theredphoenixapl.org
On collectives, the government planned to
provide tractors, fertilizers, and better seed,
and to teach peasants modern farm methods.
The government needed increased grain output to feed workers in the cities. Surplus grain would also
be sold abroad to earn money to invest in
industry.www.allrussias.com
Peasants resisted collectivization by killing farm animals, destroying tools, and burning crops. The government
responded with brutal force.
www.xtimeline.com
Stalin sought to destroy the kulaks,
or wealthy peasants. The government
confiscated kulaks’ land and sent them
to labor camps. Thousands were
killed or died from
overwork. www.mahalo.com
Collectivization took a horrendous toll. Angry peasants often grew just enough to feed themselves. In response, the government
seized all the grain, leaving the peasants to starve. This ruthless policy, combined with
poor harvests, led to a terrible famine. Between five and eight million people died in Ukraine
alone.
www.thepeoplesvoice.org
Although collectivization increased Stalin’s control, it did not improve farm output.
During the 1930s, grain production inched upward, but meat, vegetables, and fruits remained in short
supply. Feeding the population would remain a major problem in the Soviet
Union.
kcmeesha.com
Even though Stalin’s power was absolute, he harbored obsessive fears that rival party leaders were plotting against him. In 1934, he launched the Great Purge. In
this reign of terror, Stalin and his secret police cracked down especially on Old Bolsheviks. His net soon
widened to target army heroes, industrial managers, writers, and ordinary citizens. They were charged with
a wide range of crimes, from counterrevolutionary
plots to failure to meet production quotas.
www.sharpe-online.com
Between 1936 and 1938, Stalin staged a series of spectacular public “show trials” in Moscow. Former Communist leaders confessed to all kinds of crimes
after officials tortured them or threatened their families or friends. Many purged party members were never
tried but were sent to force-labor camps in Siberia and elsewhere. Others were executed. Secret police files reveal that at least four million people were purged
during the Stalin years.
www.tumblr.com
The purges increased Stalin’s power. Old revolutionaries were replaced by young party
members who owed absolute loyalty to him. All Soviet citizens were now well aware of the
consequences of disloyalty.
www.rferl.org
However, Stalin also paid a price. The victims of the purges included most of the nation’s
military officers. This loss of military leadership would weigh heavily on Stalin in
1941, when Germany invaded the Soviet Union.
www.ushmm.org
Between 1917 and 1939, the Soviet Union pursued two very different goals in foreign policy. As Communists,
both Lenin and Stalin wanted to bring about the worldwide revolution that Marx had predicted. But as
Russians, they wanted to guarantee their nation’s security by winning the support of other countries. The
result of pursuing two different goals was a contradictory and generally unsuccessful foreign
policy.
library.thinkquest.org
Lenin formed the Communist International, or Comintern. It aided revolutionary groups
around the world and urged colonial peoples to rise up against imperialist powers. Yet the
Soviet Union also sought to join the League of Nations and to improve relations with western
governments.
links.org.au
The Comintern’s propaganda against capitalism made western powers highly
suspicious of the Soviet Union. In the United States, fear of Bolshevik plots led to the “Red
Scare” in the early 1920s. Britain broke off relations with the Soviet Union when evidence revealed Soviet schemes to turn a 1926 strike
into a revolution.
Even so, the Soviet Union slowly won recognition from western powers and
increased trade with capitalist countries. It also joined the League of Nations. However,
mistrust still poisoned relations, especially
after the Great Purge.
skepticism.org
Historians often compare the Russian, French, and American revolutions. The American Revolution was in many ways the least radical of the three. American
leaders did not order mass executions or
seize property.
bicycle2011.com
French revolutionaries executed thousands and nationalized the lands of
the Church and the aristocracy.
www.sinj.com
In Russia, Stalin seized even the lands of the peasant masses. His policies caused
millions of deaths.
www.urbantitan.com
All three revolutions had a worldwide
impact. The Declaration of
Independence and the United States
Constitution served as models of democratic
government. The French Revolution
inspired revolts across Europe.
www.blueridge.edu
The Soviet Union would support revolts in many
lands and become a model for other communist
governments. Yet today, Russia and most of its allies have abandoned the goals of Lenin and Stalin. Democratic nations continue to build on
the principles preached during the American and
French revolutions. molinaopinion.blogspot.com