8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
1/17
A Project
On
KASHMIR
INSURGENCY
8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
2/17
Acknowledgement
I wish to thank _____________for their tremendous contribution and support bothmorally and financially towards the completion of this project.
I am also grateful to my project supervisor Mr./Mrs________________who
without his/her help and guidance this project would not have been completed.
I also show my gratitude to my friends and all who contributed in one way or the
other in the course of the project.
Thanking you
name
class-sec
8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
3/17
Introduction
Kashmir is the northwestern region of the Indian subcontinent. Until the mid-19thcentury, the term Kashmir geographically denoted only the valley between the
Great Himalayas and the Pir Panjal mountain range. Contemporarily, Kashmir
denotes a larger area that includes the Indian administered state of Jammu and
Kashmir (Jammu, Kashmir, and Ladakh), the Pakistani administered Gilgit-
Baltistan and Azad Kashmir, and the Chinese-administered regions of Aksai Chin
and the Trans-Karakoram Tract.
The story behind the partition of
Kashmir
After the Partition of India in
1947, the princely states were
given the option of joining either
India or Pakistan. However, Hari
Singh, the maharaja of Jammu and Kashmir, wanted Jammu and Kashmir to
remain independent. In order to buy some time, he signed a stand-still agreement,which sidestepped the agreement that each princely state would join either India or
Pakistan.Later there was a revolution by Muslims in the western part of the
kingdom and the raiders from North-West Frontier Province and the Tribal Areas
feared that Hari Singh might join the Indian Union.
In October 1947, supported by the Pakistani Army, they attacked Kashmir and
tried to take over control of Kashmir. Initially Hari Singh tried to resist their
progress but failed. Hari Singh then requested the Indian Union to help. India
responded that it could not help unless Kashmir joined India. So on 26 October1947, Kashmir accession papers were signed and Indian troops were airlifted to
Srinagar. Fighting ensued between the Indian Army and Pakistani Army, with
control stabilizing more or less around what is now the "Line of Control".
8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
4/17
In 1949, a cease-fire line separating the Indian- and Pakistani-controlled parts of
Kashmir was formally put into effect.
Post this cease fire agreement the princely state of Kashmir was divided between
India and Pakistan.
The Pakistani government divided Kashmir into two parts
1.Azad Jammu and Kashmir (AJK) - the narrow southern part..Azad Jammu and
Kashmir (AJK) is a self-governing state under Pakistani control but is not
constitutionally part of Pakistan.It has its own elected president, prime minister,
legislature, high court, and official flag
2.Gilgit-Baltistan formerly called Federally Administered Northern Areas (FANA)
- is the much larger area to the north of AJK, it was directly administered by
Pakistan as a de facto dependent territory, i.e., a non-self-governing territory.
However it was officially granted full autonomy on August 29, 2009
The Indian occupied Kashmir
India controls the central and southern portion of Kashmir.This includes :
Jammu [main cities : Jammu,Poonch]
Ladakh in the east [main cities : Leh and Kargil]
The Kashmir valley : currently it has population of around four million, 97% of
whom are Muslim. It lies completely within Indian administration in the state of
Jammu and Kashmir. Srinagar is its main city and also the summer capital of the
state. Other main cities are Anantnag and Baramulla.
China and Kashmir
China has occupied Aksai Chin since the early 1950s and, in addition, an adjoining
region almost 8% of the territory, the Trans-Karakoram Tract was ceded by
Pakistan to China in 1963.
8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
5/17
Demographics of Kashmir
The population divide in the various parts of Jammu and Kashmir is as follows:
Jammu : [ 30% Muslims, 66% Hindus : the Kashmiri Pandits, 4% others]Ladakh : [50% Muslims, 46% Buddhist, 4% others]
Kashmirvalley : [most populous : 96% Muslims , 4% Hindus]
About 135,000 Hindus/Muslims in Indian Administered Kashmir are
internally displaced due to militancy
These figures would help you understand why the Kashmir valley has been the
most troubled area in the entire Jammu and Kashmir region and the one vociferous
in asking for independence from India.
8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
6/17
Insurgency in Kashmir
The begining of terrorism in Kashmir
The inceptionThough there had been
instances of sporadic
conflict in many regions for
many years, intensified
attacks occurred in the late
1980s, when the 1987 state
elections were rigged
although disputed ; had
resulted in some of the
'states legislative assembly''formed militant wings' later
on after the election
forming and creating the
catalyst for the insurgency
Indian Government believes Mujahideen fighters from Afghanistan slowly
infiltrated the region, with Pakistan's help, following the end of the Soviet-Afghan
War in 1989.
Reasons for insurgency demand for independent Kashmir in favour of joining Pakistan
Pakistan's role in terrorism in Kashmir A 1994 report by Human Rights Watch group lends support to both Indian
and Pakistani charges. In support of Indian claims, it states that "
8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
7/17
There is compelling evidence that elements of the Pakistani government have
sponsored a significant flow of arms to Kashmiri militants [from arms bazaars inthe North West Frontier Province], as well as an extensive training program.
The Council on Foreign Relations states that Pakistans military and Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) both include personnel who sympathize withor
even assistIslamist militants adding that "ISI has provided covert but well-
documented support to terrorist groups active in Kashmir, among other
outfits.
The UN Security Council has also confirmed the existence of terroristgroups based in [Pakistani] Kashmir and urged Pakistan to crack down on
terrorist groups which had been operating in Kashmir and killing innocent
people
Pakistan's stance on terrorism in Kashmir
Pakistan describes the separatists as "freedom fighters" and says that it supports
their effort for the cause of the Kashmiris only morally and diplomatically.
Pakistan however admits that there has been 'cross border infiltration of militants'
across the Line of Control.
In 2008, Pakistani President Asif Ali Zardari said India has never been a threat to
Pakistan, and that militants in Kashmir are terrorists . In 2002, Pakistani president
Pervez Musharraf tried to clamp down on the militantsoperating from Pakistan.
8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
8/17
The various terrorist organisations in Kashmir
India frequently asserts that most of the separatist militant groups are based in
Pakistan and Pakistan-administered Kashmir (also known as Azad Kashmir). Some
like the All Parties Hurriyat
Conference and the Jammu and
Kashmir Liberation Front,
demand an independent Kashmir.
Other militant groups such as
Lashkar-e-Toiba and Jaish-e-
Mohammed favour a Pakistani-
Kashmir.
These groups have contacts with
Taliban and Bin Laden. Both theorganisations no longer operate
under these names after they were
banned by the Indian and
Pakistani government, and by
other countries including the US and UK. Of the larger militant groups, the Hizbul
Mujahideen, a militant organisation based in Indian administered Kashmir, unlike
other groups, has only kept its name.
Despite casualties, the militants are still believed to number thousands rather than
hundreds. Several new separatist organizations have also emerged. According toUS Intelligence, Al-Qaeda also has a main base in Pakistani Kashmir and is
helping to foment terrorism in Jammu and Kashmir
The three important seperatist leaders in Jammu and Kashmir
All Parties Hurriyat Conference : Syed Ali Shah Geelani(chairman Tehreek-e-Hurriyat a component of All Parties Hurriyat
Conference)
Jammu and Kashmir Liberation Front : Yasin Mailk (chief) Mirwaiz Umar Farooq : moderate Hurriyat leader / Chairman of the Awami
Action committee.
8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
9/17
The changing equation in Kashmir
In the angry slogans being shouted in Srinagar's streets,there's an important
ingredient that's missing - Pakistan.Is this an opportunity for India to solve the
Kashmir issue without Pakistan's interference?
The transition from militancy to street protest has overturned the Kashmir
paradigm. After three months and over 100 deaths, stone-pelters have emerged as
the defining face of a new movement.They call themselves the Sangbaaz Tehreek.
Who are these Sangbaaz Tehreek?
they already have a committed membership of over 30,000 youths of who10,000 are full time stone pelters.
thousand more are silent supporters : they operate through the internet wherethe outpouring of the Azadi sentiment is overwhelming
many are students and professionals ,products of growing middle class inKashmir that has used India's economic boom to take wings
How are they different from terrorists?
they have taken everyone by surprise : marginalised pro-Indian politics andforced the seperatist leaders to modify their pro-Pakistan tilt
these are clear headed people , vocal and unambiguous about their demandsfor an independant Kashmir
they have a social sanction which militancy never had they have lambasted Geelani for his pro-Pakistan tilt : for them Pakistan as a
concept is dead in Pakistan itself
Why are they important?
they are powerful coz they have a social sanction secondly these people are unarmed and hence using guns against them
would lead to violation of human rights
they are educated and clear headed and know what they want
8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
10/17
How is this an opportunity for India?
with Pakistan out of the equation ,the window has opened for a directdialogue between Srinagar and New Delhi
The stone pelters have succeded where the seperatist tried and failed.It is ironicwhat the Hurriyat could not do in six years these stone pelters did in 3
months.They have got India's attention and made it realise there is a problem in
Kashmir.
Now it's for the center to take the nex steps before it misses yet another opportunity
to bring peace to the troubled valley.
8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
11/17
Globalisation and the Media
On the basis of the theoretical foundations that, in
bringing information to the rest of the world, the
media not only has a wide outreach but also its owninfluence on public opinion. The long-standing
Kashmir issue should have been picked up as major
threat to security in South Asia. It merits attention
for two reasons - its long duration due to the nature
of dispute, which has led to the ongoing tense
relations between India and Pakistan, and, not the
least, the manner of the sustained suffering of the Kashmiri people in the face of
unabated brutalities they continue to face. An additional cause for concern is thatthe two major protagonistsIndia and Pakistanhave demonstrated their nuclear
capabilities. Yet regarding this issue with a long history of UN resolutions, there is
a willful undermining of the importance of the resolution of the dispute to South
Asian security and to the world. The Kashmir dispute has the capacity to unleash a
wave of greater uncertainty in the political and the economic climate of the South
Asia, which would affect Asia as a whole and the world at large.
Actors often shape information to project and protect their own vital interests and
thus present an issue in a special light. Thus an international media coverage thatcould necessitate international actions or condemnation is itself first shaped by
national interests of the home countries of the media. In short, media tends to
register truth in various formats and often in changed contexts that further
complicates the nature of the dispute and the way in which it is projected. Hence
the coloring given to conflicts, is largely a derivative of factors such as particular
power politics, specific national interests and the saliency of the issue to the parties
controlling international access to information. Thus, the Kashmir dispute can be
said to have been subjected to three kinds of media projections: the working of thepowerful international media, mostly that of the western-based news agencies and
the local media of both India and Pakistan. A new factor is that of the Kashmiri
articulation of their interests. Therefore the means of mass media such as
television, cinema, magazines and newspapers, all become power factors due to
their role in influencing and molding public opinion.
8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
12/17
Kashmir Dispute as a Case Study
The purpose is to examine the impact of the communications revolution on the
Kashmir dispute. What role has the media played in portraying this particular
conflict and its desired resolution? Why and how do some conflicts receivepositive media coverage, and hence international attention, while others are
ignored or negatively portrayed? And finally, how can victims of violence get into
the picture and earn international sympathy and support? This study cannot provide
definitive answers to these difficult, but important questions. Instead it seeks to
invite further discussion by highlighting their significance to the conflict resolution
processes. The Kashmir dispute is taken up as case study because it has existed on
the international agenda of problems for a long time. For all the coverage it has
been given, it still remains unresolved. Therefore, there is a need to see what are
the reasons for its misguided fate.
Role of the Media
Information is power. Its production,
processing, and dissemination carry
implications for power relations. The control
of information and information technology is
vital in the reconfiguration of power and
politics, locally and globally. Dominant
social groups can, and invariably do, use the "media as ideological weapons to
secure advantages for themselves".
As the case study of the Kashmir dispute suggests, the mass media remains a
powerful ideological informational tool. The dominant social groups use it to
backup their economic and political hegemony. In this core dispute between India
and Pakistan, the Western media has chosen to portray India in a positive light
despite its inhumane policies in Kashmir and elsewhere in India, which the Indianmedia itself has criticized. The Kashmiris are fighting against a powerful regional
ally of the West. Hence the conflict is seen more in terms of a colonial legacy, a
dispute left over by history.
8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
13/17
The legality of the issue, despite early UN Security Council resolutions on the
dispute and the latter day condemnation of the human rights violations by the
Indian troops against the Kashmiri population, is often to the international public
opinion, as either Indias domestic problem, or an instance of Islamic
fundamentalism, or a bilateral dispute between parties.
The liberation movement is often depicted as a terrorist militancy instigated
primarily by Pakistan. Consequently, the attempts to get a positive international
image are constantly thwarted by India. India uses these western media biases to
show the conflict in various ways and thus thwart efforts towards a bilateral
dialogue, or make meaningful concessions to the people of Kashmir.
Media coverage of this conflict was primarily based on given set of cultural
attributes specific also to the media itself, to the exclusion of a broader reference toother facts of differing social structures, or of
solution oriented processes. As the case of
Kashmir dispute suggests the media also has
the potential of precipitating the
degeneration of political conflict into
violence and warfare, within and between
states. In addition the interventionist forces,
to justify their presence in an area, often useMedia coverage of human right violations.
Such is the case of the continued Indian military presence in the Valley.
Media can repress or liberate, unite or fragment a society, as well as promote or
hold back social progress. This makes media an extremely powerful tool, a catalyst
of social, structural and cultural changes. Given the power and transformative
potential of the mass media, the question of whose reality is presented, who owns
it and whose interests it serves, become central to a critical discussion of the
impact of the media in conflict dynamics and resolution. The case study of theKashmir dispute suggests that the international media uses selective reporting, and
uses human rights violations only to justify international intervention and not put
an end to atrocities. In the case of Kashmir human rights violations have not led to
international intervention because the conflict has been constantly depicted as an
intra-state dispute. The legal and moral responsibility of the international
8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
14/17
community was stronger in other cases such as Mozambique, Haiti, and Tajikistan,
where the dispute was clearly an internal affair, therefore outside the framework of
the regular norms of UN intervention yet international intervention did take place.
The coverage of the happenings in these areas created the necessary conditions for
the possibility of International intervention without the costs of acting outside theframework of UN or the norms of international affairs.
UN intervention is only justified where in internal conflict is a threat to
international security. In the case of the Kashmir dispute, the growing escalation in
the conflict is a serious threat to regional security, hence it merits international
attention. International resolutions exist to support the people of Kashmir in their
fight for self-determination, yet the issue has remained on the back burner of the
international media. Bias of the international media often plays to the tune of the
dominant groups in their respective countries.
8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
15/17
Conclusion
The media itself works within the established framework of international security
and power politics and time and again has bent principles of objectivity to the
biases of the environment. Conflicts are picked or not picked up by theinternational media in the nationalised context of international values and domestic
audiences of the countries of origin, of the respective media.
The globalization of economies and information has had a tremendous impact on
the way a dispute is projected by the protagonist and accessed by the user of the
information. In the case of the Kashmir dispute the globalisation of the economy,
and the Wests search for bigmarkets has accentuated the
conflict in the region. It is
necessary that the dispute be
addressed with the motive to bring
political stability in the region,
even if economic reasons are the
over arching motivations. In this
context the role played by the
media is not only important but
also fundamental to the process of
Conflict resolution. It is the accurate reporting of the media, which brings pressure
on the parties involved in a conflict to realize that the time is ripe for conflict
resolution and any delay is likely to increase the costs of the conflict.
There are no simple answers to the role of the media in conflict resolution but it is
time to re examine the prevailing ideas in the use of media. How it can be
remolded to preserve peace and security of people. A truly independent
international media can be an effective trustee of future generations, hence efforts
should be made to empower media to become responsible and handle this difficult
but important task, for the benefit of the successor generations.
8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
16/17
There is no easy way of solving the Kashmir crisis. Attempts at resolving the
conflict have been going on for over 50 years yet have seen very little progress. It
is time for a change and a new approach to settling the situation. India and
Pakistan should strike a deal with the United Nations and work together for a more
prosperous future. Key elements of this proposal require India and Pakistan to signthe Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and the Comprehensive Nuclear-Test-Ban
Treaty. India should declare the Line of Control the international border and also
give Kashmir more autonomy. What the UN must do in return is establish peace in
the region and guarantee no border skirmishes. It should also provide funding to
strengthen the economy of Kashmir. These steps will hopefully revitalize Kashmir
and once again, allow it to be known for immense beauty rather that for grave
atrocity.
8/2/2019 Kashmir Insurgency - Hard Copy
17/17
References
www.google.com
http://www.google.com/http://www.google.com/http://www.google.com/