7/31/2019 It's Been a Wonderful Life
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/its-been-a-wonderful-life 1/13
‘‘It’s been a wonderful life’’: accounts of the interplay
between structure and agency by ‘‘good’’ universityteachers
Brenda Leibowitz • Susan van Schalkwyk • John Ruiters •
Jean Farmer • Hanelie Adendorff
Ó Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011
Abstract This study is set in an era and a context in which extrinsic forms of motivation
and reward are offered by higher education institutions as a means to enhance teaching,
and in which teaching is effectively undervalued in relation to research. The study focuses
on the role of agency in professional development and demonstrates the relevance of
Margaret Archer’s description of the interplay between structure and agency for under-
standing how academics enhance their teaching in research-intensive universities. Ten
semi-structured interviews were conducted by a team of academic development advisors inorder to obtain accounts of teaching academics of their becoming good teachers, in their
own words. An analysis of the transcripts of the interviews with the lecturers demonstrates
how dimensions such as biography, current contextual influences, individuals’ dispositions
and steps taken to enhance teaching interact in a spiralling manner to generate a sense of
self-fulfilment and agency. Intrinsic, rather than extrinsic motivation, is shown to be sig-
nificant in propelling individuals towards action. The article concludes with an assessment
of the implications of the interplay between structure and agency, the need for an enabling
environment with a key role for intrinsic motivation for professional development strate-
gies, in research-intensive universities.
Keywords Agency Á Structure Á Teaching Á Professional development Á South Africa
Introduction
‘‘It’s been a wonderful life, and when I die, I think I hope to have the satisfaction of
knowing that perhaps a lot of young people have enjoyed my subject. What more can
I ask for?’’ (Percival)
Percival is a Professor of Microbiology, and although formally retired, he still teaches on amedical undergraduate programme at a research-intensive university in South Africa. Two
years in a row he has been nominated as the lecturer who made the most significant impact
B. Leibowitz (&) Á S. van Schalkwyk Á J. Ruiters Á J. Farmer Á H. Adendorff
Centre for Teaching and Learning, Stellenbosch University, Stellenbosch, South Africa
e-mail: [email protected]
123
High Educ
DOI 10.1007/s10734-011-9445-8
7/31/2019 It's Been a Wonderful Life
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/its-been-a-wonderful-life 2/13
on one of the university’s top thirty-first-year students’ academic achievement. Percival’s
statement provides a glimpse of his personal biography, and displays a variety of emotions
such as joy or satisfaction, and values such as commitment to the academic discipline or to
the students. These emotions and values play an important role in what is increasingly
referred to as the ‘‘interplay’’ between structure and agency (Archer 2000, 2007) withregard to society and individual mobility, and with regard to education (Crawford 2010;
Luckett and Luckett 2009; and Wilmott 1999). An understanding of agency and its
workings can provide guidance for the professional development of academics in their
teaching role (Kahn 2009) and the facilitation of change in higher education (Clegg 2005).
We believe the question of agency and how it may flourish in relation to contexts which
might be enabling or constraining, depending on the socio-political and material conditions
which influence them, is significant in the light of the increasing trend towards awards,
grants and incentives for good teaching and teaching enhancement. In this article we
explore the interplay between structure and agency via an analysis of the accounts of
becoming good teachers by a group of teaching academics deemed successful by first-year
students at a South African university. It is our intention that some of the implications of
this analysis will offer insights for the professional development of academics in their
teaching role, specifically in a research-intensive institution. In so doing we hope to
contribute to the ongoing international debates around the nature of the ‘professional
learning’ (Brew 2004, p. 5), of university teachers.
Setting and motivation for the study
The University at which the research was conducted is what is referred to in South Africa
as a ‘‘historically advantaged’’ or ‘‘historically white’’ institution. The University admits
amongst the highest academic achieving students in the country, but remains socially and
racially exclusive. A decade ago the University signalled the intention to become a
research-intensive institution and has succeeded in making strong progress in this direc-
tion. During this same period, it has made contradictory policy level statements with regard
to the role of teaching. For example several years ago it was announced at the University
Senate that salary improvements would be made to academics who were internationally
ranked researchers. Since then, however, a drive to see the three academic roles of
research, teaching and community interaction as integrated has been the focus of a numberof institutional discussions. Yet while there is an intention to recognise teaching, and while
there are faculties or departments where teaching is overtly valued, this is not uniform
across the campus. The tension that exists between research and teaching, typically at
research-intensive universities, is an international phenomenon that has been well-docu-
mented in the literature (Chalmers 2011; Austin and Chang 1995). Much of this work
highlights the impact that this tension has on the professional learning of academics and the
extent to which they may elect to seek to enhance their teaching practice (Herman and
Cilliers 2008). The University has a Centre for Teaching and Learning (CTL), which
actively promotes the status of teaching and provides opportunities for academics to
enhance their professional development. The study was undertaken to support the work of
this Centre.
Given the social complexities informing the institution in which this study was con-
ducted, and indeed, the complexities bedevilling higher education internationally, we thus
take the position that good teaching and the debates that inform what good teaching is and
should be, cannot be discussed in a purely technicist and a-social manner. The account of
High Educ
123
7/31/2019 It's Been a Wonderful Life
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/its-been-a-wonderful-life 4/13
written in the literature on professional development about the significance of the material
aspects such as funding and resources, possibly because in the environments giving rise to
this literature, from the developed world, these material elements are taken for granted.
One would have to refer to a larger body of literature on social justice (see for example
Fraser 2003, on the complementarity of distribution and recognition) in order to stress theimportance of the material aspects of context. In countries such as South Africa where
funding for higher education is lower than the international norms (National Advisory
Council on Innovation 2006) and where there are great material disparities between
institutions (Council on Higher Education 2006), this aspect of context cannot be ignored.
Even if we assume that good teaching can be developed and is not purely innate, the
question still arises, why do some people become good teachers and others do not? Why
are some teachers more motivated to enhance their teaching than others? What role does
personal biography play, what role does the specific context play, and what role does
individual agency play in relation to structure? The literature on good teaching provides
many examples of these dimensions of good teaching, but does not provide an explanatory
framework about how it all fits together. The answer to this series of questions can be
found, we maintain, in the work of sociologist Margaret Archer, on the interplay between
what she refers to as ‘structure’ and ‘agency. In the next section we describe those aspects
of her account of the interplay of structure and agency that are useful for understanding
being and becoming good lecturers in higher education.
The interplay of structure and agency
Archer locates her ideas on the interplay of structure and agency within the ‘‘morphoge-
netic’’ approach (1982), which refers to change of structure over time. The individual is not
entirely free and autonomous, nor is he or she entirely determined by structure. He or she
has powers of acting and of transforming society (Archer 2002). Structure consists of the
rules and resources that may constrain or enable action, where these constraints have
‘‘differential malleability’’ (1982, p. 462) with some structural properties having more
constraining power, or are more difficult to change, than others. Examples of rules and
resources could be the rules for promotion, or the resources allocated to teaching, such as
technology support or tutors. These circumstances are not of our choosing, and most
constraints except the most dire can be circumnavigated, but with varying degrees of effort(Archer 2000). Out of the interplay between structure and action, new properties, such as
agency, emerge and these are irreducible to what came before (Archer 2000). Structure and
agency may once again interact or interplay, leading to new emergences.
From our interactions with the world, our personal identity emerges, which is a matter
of ‘‘what we care about in the world’’, our fundamental concerns (2002, p. 15). Emotions
play an important role, as they have the ‘‘power to modify the cognitive goal’’ (2000,
p. 196), thus the desire to act, to maintain a relationship with the environment, or to disrupt
that relationship. Emotions, one of the most important of which for professionals is self-
worth, provide a ‘‘commentary on our concerns’’ (2000, p. 195), as is evident in thecomment about his teaching ‘‘life’’ by Percival in the introduction. These concerns are
invested in various aspects of our lives, for example family or careers. Our concerns
prompt judgment about what matters, and what to care about. A crucial aspect of the
interplay between structure and agency with regard to enhancing one’s own performance
would be sense of competence, ‘‘positive feedback from practical reality signaling (some)
performative achievement’’ (Archer 2000, p. 196). Via an ongoing internal conversation,
High Educ
123
7/31/2019 It's Been a Wonderful Life
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/its-been-a-wonderful-life 5/13
which she refers to as ‘‘reflexivity’’ (2007), our concerns or commitments attain a ‘‘unique
pattern’’ (Archer 2000, p. 240), which generates our personal identity. Archer maintains
that our personal identity, that we acquire at maturity, is the outcome of a ‘‘continuous
sense of self’’ (2000, p. 9), also evident in the sense of continuity of identity and com-
mitments of Percival. Out of this emerges for many of us a social identity, which shedescribes as the capacity to express what we care about in social roles that are appropriate
in doing this (2002, p. 17). Such a social role could be that of a ‘‘lecturer’’. If being a good
lecturer is important to one’s sense of self worth, then one would be spurred to cognitive
action if one’s sense of competence was affirmed. When there is alignment between an
individual’s commitments and their social roles, social identity is achieved (Archer 2000).
The emergence of agency as a positive response to a sense of self worth and competence
would also support the account of identity as emerging from an individual’s trajectory
within a community of practice (Wenger 1998). According to Wenger, ‘‘Identity is pro-
duced as a lived experience of participation in specific communities’’ (1998, p. 151). This
sense of identity leads to creativity and meaning making, essential in order to flourish as a
good teacher. If it is enhanced via participation in a community of practice, and pre-
sumably within prior communities, this helps to explain why an individual’s biography is
relevant to the story of one’s becoming a good teacher. Archer’s theories have been
elaborated in general sociological texts. In this study, we attempt to demonstrate how this
interplay between structure and agency holds in the specific context of teaching in higher
education. The research design of this study is described in the next section.
Research design
This study became possible due to a task the authors of this paper were engaged in as part
of their work to enhance the stature of teaching at the university. In 2006 the University
adopted a strategy to enhance the learning experience of the first-year student, known as
the ‘‘First-year Academy’’. A small-scale initiative launched as part of this strategy was the
‘‘Rector’s Dinner for Top Achieving First-year Students’’. One purpose of this initiative
was to spotlight the commitment and dedication of lecturers of first-year modules. In this
scheme a list of the 30 most successful first-year students is compiled each year, and at the
beginning of the following year, they are invited to a dinner with the University’s
Principal. The lecturers, whom these 30 students nominate as having made the most impacton their achievement, are also invited to the dinner. The students write letters to the
lecturers, explaining why they have nominated them. The lecturers write replies, with a
message of support for the students. In order to explore what could be learnt from this
group of lecturers about good practice and support for good practice, a team of researchers
from the CTL embarked on a small-scale research project to interview a selection of these
lecturers in 2008 (see the outcome in Leibowitz et al. 2009) and in 2010. The 2010 study is
the focus of this article.
This interpretive study is what Crawford (2010) and Clegg (2005) would refer to as a
‘‘bottom up’’ account, focusing on how the lecturers describe their attributes and theirengagement with their own professional development. It avoids the tendency of academic
developers to ‘‘impose their own views on others’’ (Kahn 2009, p. 206). The interview
approach was adopted as an attempt to enable the interviewers and interviewees to surface
a ‘‘sense of who they are and what their current experiences meant for them’’ (Taylor 2008,
p. 30). The team devised a semi-structured interview schedule (see Appendix 2) focusing
on how the lecturer perceived him or herself as good and what he or she did in order to
High Educ
123
7/31/2019 It's Been a Wonderful Life
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/its-been-a-wonderful-life 6/13
become, or to sustain him or herself as a good lecturer. Our intention was to hear from the
lecturers in their own words. We were aware that they, like all individuals in interview
situations, make strategic and rhetorical choices about how they portray themselves
(Cousin 2009; Edwards 1997). Because they are constructing their identity and sense of
self as they tell their stories, they tend to portray a more unified and organised sense of whothey are than might be the case in reality (Taylor 2008, p. 30). However we believed that
given our focus on human intentionality and agency, their control over the telling of their
stories was necessary.
We did not seek to define what we considered to be good lecturers, but rather selected
academics out of the group that had been nominated by the 2010 top performing students.
This selection was conducted according to criteria which ensured a spread in terms of level
of seniority, discipline, race and gender, and preferred to choose those who had either been
nominated by more than one student in the same year, had been nominated in a previous
year or who had received other teaching awards at the University (and who had not been
interviewed by the team previously). Ten academics agreed to participate in the audio-
taped interviews, which lasted between half an hour and one and a half hours (see
Appendix 1). In some cases the lecturers followed up the interviews with written accounts
or provided further information and examples of their work. We do not believe that the fact
that the nominations came from academically strong students distorted the study unduly in
favour of an elite or elitist group, as many of the interviewees subsequently stressed that
they were surprised to have been nominated by the strongest students. They believed they
cared more about the struggling students.
The ten interview transcripts were subjected to thematic content analysis by the dif-
ferent members of the research team, drawing on a set of codes that were developed by theteam in the earlier study, but revised in the light of the data and in reading of the work of
Archer (2000, 2007) on structure and agency. The codes, used as subsections for the
findings in the next section, are: biography, contextual influences, dispositions of the
lecturer (emotions and attitudes); and steps taken to enhance teaching.
Findings: becoming a good lecturer
Biography
Biographical influences featured prominently in the motivation to become a good lec-
turer in several of the accounts and generated the personal identity that Archer refers to.
These influences are part of the ‘‘given’’ in an individual’s trajectory, and are them-
selves influenced by the ceaseless interplay between structure and agency in earlier
phases of an individual’s life trajectory. In Wendy1’s case biographical influences
included that she struggled with mathematics as a student (possibly a constraining
influence), but that a model lecturer provided her with the impetus to teach well, thus an
enabling influence.
Lecturers gave examples of how their families and childhoods—whether these weremiddle class or working class—influenced them to want to become good lecturers. The
frequency of these references is not surprising, since the family is a key influence in
1 All first names are pseudonyms.
High Educ
123
7/31/2019 It's Been a Wonderful Life
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/its-been-a-wonderful-life 7/13
individuals’ educational biographies (Leibowitz 2009). The family is the primary social-
isation agency in general (Bernstein 1990), and in relation to education and literacy in
particular (Hannon 1995). Percival’s account shows how his father supported his devel-
oping a love for his subject:
‘‘I remember saying to my father, ‘‘You know Dad, I’m not very good at sport, but
I’m very interested in microscopy’’, so he said, ‘‘Son, if that is your interest, that is
what you must do’’, I have never forgotten it because many fathers push their
children to go and do something they don’t want to do, so it allowed me time to go
and collect samples of mud from the streams and so on…. I can tell you in all
honesty that I never changed, my whole life actually has been a hobby, that gives you
an idea as to why I so love my subject, because it has always been with me.’’
(Percival)
In the following account Cyril’s motivation for becoming a good lecturer draws strength
from the fact that he might be the only one of his peers from a rural school for black children in apartheid South Africa that reached university:
‘‘I grew up in very difficult circumstances and if I think back today, in that whole
class that were with me in primary school in Wolseley I think I am the only one who
got out of that situation. I never forget those who were with me and especially if I go
back to my family and I see the people who were with me at primary school, I do
realise how happy I am and how blessed I am, so I need to do something in small
ways also on their behalf …. And those are the things that drive what I am doing.’’
(Cyril)
This is an example of what Yosso (2005) calls ‘‘community cultural wealth’’, where family
and community aspirations or forms of resistance motivate him or her, in an agentic
fashion, to succeed in education.
Prior professional experience is another form of biographical influence mentioned by
some of these good lecturers. Wendy taught in a tertiary institution for disadvantaged
students in the largely rural Northern Cape Province before arriving at Stellenbosch
University. Cyril and Mahlubi were high school teachers and both were involved in the
provincial administration responsible for schools. The insights they acquired from these
experiences better positioned them to respond to the diverse needs of the students they now
encounter at the University.
Current contextual influences
The second set of influences on the lecturers’ becoming and remaining good teachers
derived from their immediate work contexts. The dramatic, and positive influence that a
workgroup (Trowler 2008) can have on enhancing teaching, is illustrated in Wendy’s
comments:
‘‘Last year I taught in John’s group and that I must also say I was privileged last year
to teach within a group of people. Both John and Jaco were nominated for awardspreviously and so to work with them was a dream come true really, because everyone
is trying to be good at what they are doing and be good lecturers and make Maths 1
enjoyable… That drives you to be as good as them and to be inspired by what they
have done.’’ (Wendy)
High Educ
123
7/31/2019 It's Been a Wonderful Life
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/its-been-a-wonderful-life 10/13
Steps taken to enhance teaching
Reflection is the most common enhancement activity cited by the lecturers. Sizwe writes
notes about his reflections after each lesson:
‘‘I make sure that after each and every lesson, I sit down, I can call it ‘‘in-service
training’’, I sit down and say, ‘‘OK let me look where I can do better, and where did
I lose my students, and where did I push them too fast?’’ (Sizwe)
While reflection may be an act that a lecturer consciously performs, it is also
attitudinal, a way of responding analytically or critically to information that comes
his or her way. Cyril described his reaction to the letter from the top-performing
student in this manner:
‘‘Oh I can tell you I am very critical about my own work and I’m very aware of all
my gaps…
. But for the first time when I started to read what [the student] wroteabout me, it gave me a better understanding of what she is getting from me, or let me
rather put it, what I have helped her to start to see…. I looked through that booklet
that we got after the award ceremony, it can be quite interesting to go and analyse
what were the things, what are the common threads in the students’ comments.’’
(Cyril)
Reflection is also about being open to criticism from others, ‘‘so I stopped doing [an
activity in the classroom], because I felt that was a bit unfair to them, so I am open to any
criticism that students have’’ (Lee Anne).
As an example of practical steps taken, only Cyril mentioned writing a paper aboutteaching for a scholarly journal. This is not surprising, given the low value traditionally
accorded to publishing on teaching as opposed to publishing in one’s disciplinary area
of expertise, in research-led institutions. Another step taken was to innovate. Wendy
successfully introduced an essay into the mathematics class. Many of the respondents
mentioned constant and careful preparation, which, in line with Berliner’s triad of influ-
ences on good teaching (2001), could also be seen as an activity undertaken to improve
teaching.
The significance of the interplay between structure and agency
The study supports the notion of an interplay between structure and agency, which has
been demonstrated in relation to the dimensions of biography, current contextual influ-
ences, lecturer dispositions, and steps taken to enhance teaching. The interviews demon-
strate that being a good lecturer involves a great deal more than a static set of skills,
personality attributes or knowledge. Biographical and immediate contextual features
constrain or enable the lecturer to exercise agency. Agency in the higher education
teaching and learning domain is exemplified by many self-initiated activities such as
reflection, innovating, engaging in scholarship, and on occasion, by working against the
grain. Agency is not free floating, but emerges from, and impacts on, the various contexts
and personal attributes. Archer (2000, p. 50) puts this succinctly, ‘‘Our continuous sense of
self, or self-consciousness, is advanced as emerging from the ways in which we are
biologically constituted, the way the world is, and from the necessity of our human
interaction with our external environment’’.
High Educ
123
7/31/2019 It's Been a Wonderful Life
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/its-been-a-wonderful-life 11/13
This study has taken place in a specific research-led and comparatively privileged
institutional context in South African terms—one that features only some aspects of
structure. Certain enabling structural elements, especially material, are taken for granted by
individuals in a setting like the one described in this study. Thus it is only by investigating
the interplay between structure and agency comparatively, in conditions of deprivation aswell as contexts of plenitude, that one can assess how aspects of an environment may
influence the interplay of agency and structure. The concept of agency is often deployed in
relation to individuals having to go against the grain in obvious ways, for example working
class students entering academia (Clegg 2005). To gain a more embracing understanding of
the concept, contexts such as the one referred to in this study, where constraints might be
more subtle, are also important.
The interplay between structure and agency has implications for strategies for the
professional development of academics. It points to the need to take institutional context
as well as lecturers’ contextually influenced biographies into account. It suggests
maximising the lecturers’ commitments, values, and most significantly, their sense of
self-worth. The removal of disabling rules, counteracting a culture which undervalues
teaching—the features which might constrain the emergence of agency—are very pos-
sibly more appropriate elements of such a strategy, than extrinsic forms of motivation
such as greater awards or rules or exhortations of how to teach better. In the same way
that educators are frequently exhorted to take into account their students’ prior learning,
perhaps it is time to take into account and respond to the biographical and structural
features that have constrained or enabled an individual academic’s trajectory, and that
continue to do so.
Recognising that there are many more facets to being and becoming effective in one’srole as university teachers—and acknowledging that these multiple facets interact in a
variety of ways—offers a cautionary to heads of academic departments and academic
development practitioners not to take the lived experience of the academics they work with
at face value. Even a university teacher who has been recognised for her or his good
teaching has in all likelihood done so as a result of a unique interplay between the structure
and agency that comprise their lived experience. A one-size fits all approach becomes
inappropriate in this situation.
Thus this interplay points to the importance of contextually sensitive professional
development, and teaching and learning enhancement policies and programmes. The
significance of human agency, and of intrinsic motivation in particular, points to the needfor close attention to institutional cultures and discourses that value teaching as an
important aspect of the academic enterprise, and to the need for the promotion of
opportunities for academics to take conscious steps to enhance their own practices such
that they too might reflect, ultimately, on having experienced ‘a wonderful life’.
Acknowledgments Thanks to Kevin Williams for providing a constructive and critical response to a draft
of this paper.
Appendix 1: Lecturers interviewed
See Table 1.
High Educ
123
7/31/2019 It's Been a Wonderful Life
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/its-been-a-wonderful-life 12/13
Appendix 2: Interview questions
1. What are the attributes that characterize you as a ‘‘good lecturer’’?2. What facilitates your becoming and remaining a good lecturer?
3. What prompts you to want to enhance your teaching?
4. What could be done to enhance your being or becoming a good teacher?
References
Archer, M. (1982). Morphogenesis versus structuration: On combining structure and action. British Journal
of Sociology, 33(4), 445–483.
Archer, M. (2000). Being human: The problem of agency. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Archer, M. (2002). Realism and the problem of agency. Journal of Critical Realism, 5(1), 11–20.
Archer, M. (2007). Making our way through the world: Human reflexivity and social mobility. Cambridge:
Cambridge University Press.
Austin, A., & Chang, M. (1995). Colleges that emphasise research and teaching: Can you have your cake
and eat it too? Change, September/October 45–49.
Berliner, D. (2001). Learning about and learning from expert teachers. International Journal of Educational
Research, 35, 463–482.
Bernstein, B. (1990). The structuring of pedagogic discourse, volume 4: Class, codes and control. London,
NY: Routledge.
Brew, A. (2004). The scope of academic development. International Journal for Academic Development,
9(1), 5–7.Carpenter, B., & Tait, G. (2001). The rhetoric and reality of good teaching: a case study across three
faculties at the Queensland University of Technology. Higher Education, 42(2), 191–203.
Chalmers, D. (2011). Progress and challenges to the recognition and reward of the scholarship of teaching in
higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 30(1), 25–38.
Chickering, A. W., & Gamson, Z. F. (1991). Applying the seven principles for good practice in under-
graduate education. New Directions for Teaching and Learning, 47 (Fall).
Table 1 Lecturers interviewed and their details
Lecturer
(pseudonym)
Faculty Gender Race Seniority Awards
Cyril Education M B Lecturer Nominated by first-year student in 2009Servaas Theology M W Professor Rector’s award—2009
Lee Anne Economics and
management
sciences
F W Lecturer Nominated by two first-year students in
2009; 4 students in 2008
Percival Health M W Professor Nominated by first-year student in 2009;
2008
Kobus Agric M W Professor Nominated by first-year student in 2009
Wendy Science F W Lecturer Nominated by first-year students in 2009
Mahlubi Arts M B Lecturer Nominated by first-year student in 2009
Sizwe Military M B Juniorlecturer
Was ‘‘junior best lecturer’’ in 2009 inMilitary Academy
Marcus Engineering M W Professor Rector’s award in 2003
Kirsty Arts F W Associate
professor
Nominated by two students in 2009; 2
students in 2008; received the Rector’s
award in 2007
High Educ
123
7/31/2019 It's Been a Wonderful Life
http://slidepdf.com/reader/full/its-been-a-wonderful-life 13/13
Clegg, S. (2005). Theorising the mundane: The significance of agency. International Studies in Sociology of
Education, 15(2), 149–163.
Council on Higher Education. (2006). Higher education monitor; The impact of changing funding sources
on Higher Education Institutions in South Africa. Pretoria: CHE.
Cousin, G. (2009). Researching learning in higher education: An introduction to contemporary methods and
approaches. London: Routledge.Crawford, K. (2010). Influences on academics’ approaches to development: Voices from below. Interna-
tional Journal of Academic Development, 15(3), 189–202.
Edwards, D. (1997). Discourse and cognition. London: Sage.
Fraser, N. (2003). Redistribution or recognition? A political-philosophical exchange. London: Verso.
Hannon, P. (1995). Literacy, home and school: Research and practice in teaching literacy with parents.
London: Falmer Press.
Herman, N., & Cilliers, F. J. (2008). Time ? Research = Prestige ? Money. Time ? Teaching = Prestige
or Money. Why do academics bother to develop their teaching? Paper presented at the Conference of
the International Consortium for Educational Development (ICED), Salt Lake City, Utah.
Kahn, P. (2009). Contexts for teaching and the exercise of agency in early-career academics: Perspective
from realist social theory. International Journal of Academic Development, 14(3), 197–207.
Kane, R., Sandretto, S., & Heath, C. (2004). An investigation into excellent tertiary teaching: Emphasisingreflective practice. Higher Education, 47 (3), 283–310.
Lea, S., & Callaghan, L. (2008). Lecturers on teaching within the ‘supercomplexity’ of higher education.
Higher Education, 55(2), 171–187.
Lee, J. (2009). The shaping of the departmental culture. In M. Tight, K. Mok, J. Huisman, & C. Morphew
(Eds.), The Routledge international handbook of higher education (pp. 357–368). London: Routledge.
Leibowitz, B. (2009). What’s inside the suitcases? An investigation into the powerful resources students and
lecturers bring to teaching and learning. Higher Education Research and Development, 28(3),
261–274.
Leibowitz, B., van Schalkwyk, S., van der Merwe, A., Herman, N., & Young, G. (2009). What makes a
‘good’ first-year lecturer? In B. Leibowitz, A. van der Merwe, & S. van Schalkwyk (Eds.), Focus on
first-year success: Perspectives emerging from South Africa and beyond . Stellenbosch: Sun Press.
Luckett, C., & Luckett, T. (2009). The development of agency in first generation learners in higher edu-cation: A social realist analysis. Teaching in Higher Education, 14(5), 469–481.
McLean, M. (2006). Pedagogy and the university: Critical theory and practice. London: Continuum.
National Advisory Council on Innovation. (2006). South African national system of innovation; Structures,
policies and performance. July 21, 2006, http://www.nacinnovation.biz/wp-content/uploads/pdf/ .
Accessed January 1, 2010.
Nixon, J., Marks, A., Rowland, S., & Walker, M. (2001). Towards a new academic professionalism: A
manifesto of hope. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 22(1), 227–244.
Rowland, S. (2000). The enquiring university teacher . Buckingham: SRHE and OUP.
Schon, D. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner . San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Stes, A., Clement, M., & van Petegem, P. (2007). The effectiveness of a faculty training programme: Long-
term and institutional impact. International Journal of Academic Development, 12(2), 99–109.
Taylor, P. (2008). Being an academic today. In R. Barnett & R. Di Napoli (Eds.), Changing identities inhigher education: Voicing perspectives. London: Routledge.
Trigwell, K. (2001). Judging university teaching. The International Journal for Academic Development,
6 (1), 65–73.
Trowler, P. (2008). Cultures and change in higher education: Theories and practice. Basingstoke: Palgrave
Macmillan.
Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge
University Press.
Wilmott, R. (1999). Structure, agency and the sociology of education: Rescuing analytical dualism. British
Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(1), 5–21.
Wright, M., Assar, N., Kain, E., Kramer, L., Harvey, C., McKinney, K., et al. (2004). Greedy institutions:
The importance of institutional context for teaching in higher education. Teaching Sociology, 32,
144–159.Yosso, T. (2005). Whose culture has capital? A critical race theory discussion of community cultural wealth.
Race, Ethnicity and Education, 8(1), 69–91.
High Educ
13