Ronan Lyons (Oxford / Daft.ie)
U3A Sutton Baldoyle
October 10th, 2012
First off… What’s happening house prices right now?
-7%
-6%
-5%
-4%
-3%
-2%
-1%
0%20
10q
2
2010
q3
2010
q4
2011
q1
2011
q2
2011
q3
2011
q4
2012
q1
2012
q2
2012
q3
Daft.ie (RPPR) Daft.ie (Asking) CSO
First half of the slides are based around four “stylised facts”
Real estate is a bad investment
The property market is imperfect
Accommodation is a service
Governments can manage the property market
The second half discusses property tax
Context: We’ve seen it all before… Price of Mountjoy
Square townhouse after construction in 1791:
£8,000
Price of Mountjoy Square townhouse in 1849:
£500
Fall: 94%
Real estate is a bad investment
The property market is imperfect
Accommodation is a service
Governments can manage the property market
Outline
But surely…
“Buy land – they’re not making it anymore!”
Mark Twain
This is Amsterdam’s Herengracht…
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1628
164
2
1656
1670
168
4
169
8
1712
1726
174
0
1754
176
8
178
2
179
6
1810
1824
1838
1852
186
6
188
0
189
4
190
8
1922
1936
1950
196
4
Herengracht house prices, 1628-1962
On the face of it, house prices do seem to rise at least some of the time
1628 = 100 – Source: Piet Eichholtz
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
1628
164
2
1656
1670
168
4
169
8
1712
1726
174
0
1754
176
8
178
2
179
6
1810
1824
1838
1852
186
6
188
0
189
4
190
8
1922
1936
1950
196
4
Herengracht house prices, 1628-1972
…and rose dramatically 1950-1970
1628 = 100 – Source: Piet Eichholtz
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
1628
164
2
1656
1670
168
4
169
8
1712
1726
174
0
1754
176
8
178
2
179
6
1810
1824
1838
1852
186
6
188
0
189
4
190
8
1922
1936
1950
196
4
Inflation-adjusted Herengracht house prices
Correcting for inflation, though, substantially alters the picture
Property stores value – but little more Relative to the cost of living, prices in Central
Amsterdam were no higher in 1975 than in 1875 or 1640
“Stylised fact” (1): over time, house price increases on average match inflation – but don’t beat it
This can be investigated worldwide
The literature on long-run house prices around the world is small but pretty clear on this point – e.g. New York commercial real estate or Boston house prices
In contrast, even savings accounts typically beat inflation
But surely Ireland is different?
€0
€50,000
€100,000
€150,000
€200,000
€250,000
€300,000
€350,000
€400,000
1975
Q1
1977
Q1
1979
Q1
198
1Q1
198
3Q1
198
5Q1
198
7Q1
198
9Q
1
199
1Q1
199
3Q1
199
5Q1
199
7Q1
199
9Q
1
200
1Q1
200
3Q1
200
5Q1
200
7Q1
200
9Q
1
2011
Q1
Average house prices in Ireland, 1975-2007
Again, we need to correct for inflation (and add in the post-2007 period!)
€0
€50,000
€100,000
€150,000
€200,000
€250,000
€300,000
€350,000
€400,000
1975
Q1
1977
Q1
1979
Q1
198
1Q1
198
3Q1
198
5Q1
198
7Q1
198
9Q
1
199
1Q1
199
3Q1
199
5Q1
199
7Q1
199
9Q
1
200
1Q1
200
3Q1
200
5Q1
200
7Q1
200
9Q
1
2011
Q1
Inflation-adjusted house prices, 1975-2011
The period to 1996 looks familiar!
€0
€50,000
€100,000
€150,000
€200,000
€250,000
€300,000
€350,000
€400,000
1975
Q1
1977
Q1
1979
Q1
198
1Q1
198
3Q1
198
5Q1
198
7Q1
198
9Q
1
199
1Q1
199
3Q1
199
5Q1
199
7Q1
199
9Q
1
200
1Q1
200
3Q1
200
5Q1
200
7Q1
200
9Q
1
2011
Q1
Inflation-adjusted house prices, 1975-1996
Our expectations about the future should reflect this
We should only expect house prices to increase the same rate as inflation
This has big implications for those who bought during the bubble (or those who bailed out bubble-era lending)
They can’t expect inflation to eat away their problem – they will have to wait until the principal is paid off to sell their property
It may be the 2050s before prices reach levels seen at the peak
€0
€50,000
€100,000
€150,000
€200,000
€250,000
€300,000
€350,000
€400,000
1975
198
0
198
5
199
0
199
5
200
0
200
5
2010
2015
2020
2025
2030
2035
204
0
204
5
2050
2055
206
0
Potential for house prices in Ireland, 1975-2060
Outline
Real estate is a bad investment
The property market is imperfect
Accommodation is a service
Governments can manage the property market
Economics likes assumptions Assumptions are needed to come up with any sort of
model of the world
Assumptions typically either…
1. Strip away unnecessary detail
2. Simplify a process we don’t understand yet
The danger is when economists mistake a type (2) assumption for a type (1) assumption
Most models in economics generate predictions about the equilibrium…
… but say very little about markets not in equilibrium
“Rational expectations” is a much contested assumption “Rational expectations” means that consumers know
all information and can process it
An alternative is “adaptive expectations”
i.e. people do not process every last bit of information – instead they look at the past and extrapolate into the future
This has very different implications for policy
Property markets exhibit strong tendencies of “adaptive expectations”
We can see this in Ireland over the last ten years
Adaptive expectations lend themselves to bubble-crash cycles Ireland’s crash has been so vicious because it has
ticked all the boxes of the archetypal bubble:
An initial favourable change in conditions (moving from 1980s stagnation to 1990s export-led growth)
Fresh sources of credit to turn the boom into bubble (entering the Eurozone gave Irish banks access to German savings to lend)
Fresh sources of supply (of houses) to suck everyone into the bubble (tax breaks for construction)
Despite this, people did not see the end of the bubble
Source: Analysis of ESRI-IIB Consumer Sentiment Surveys
People also find it hard to see the end of the crash The typical respondent to a survey on the property
market in January 2012 expected house prices to fall a further 10% this year
Just one in six sees house prices being higher in 2017 than they are now
This is only slightly above the number who believe house prices will fall by a further 35% or more during the same period
Outline
Real estate is a bad investment
The property market is imperfect
Accommodation is a service
Governments can manage the property market
Economics is not: “what goes up must come down”
€0
€50,000
€100,000
€150,000
€200,000
€250,000
€300,000
€350,000
€400,000
1975
Q1
1977
Q1
1979
Q1
198
1Q1
198
3Q1
198
5Q1
198
7Q1
198
9Q
1
199
1Q1
199
3Q1
199
5Q1
199
7Q1
199
9Q
1
200
1Q1
200
3Q1
200
5Q1
200
7Q1
200
9Q
1
2011
Q1
2013
Q1
2015
Q1
Average house prices in Ireland 1975-2015
Economics is about: supply and demand Supply is largely fixed
Both generally: in housing markets (compared to other markets) supply moves slowly
And specifically: in Ireland at the moment, very little construction activity happening
To understand where house prices will “land”, we need to understand demand
This is often thought of “in short-hand” as the ratio between incomes and house prices
House prices relative to incomes Between 1988 and 1995, the average house price was
3.6 times household income
Household income in 1990 was 1.15 times average income (compared to 1.33 in 2005)
The ratio in 2005-2007 was over twice this (an average of 7.4)
What if house prices had reflected household income?
€0
€50,000
€100,000
€150,000
€200,000
€250,000
€300,000
€350,000
€400,000
1975
Q1
1976
Q4
1978
Q3
198
0Q
2
198
2Q1
198
3Q4
198
5Q3
198
7Q2
198
9Q
1
199
0Q
4
199
2Q3
199
4Q
2
199
6Q
1
199
7Q4
199
9Q
3
200
1Q2
200
3Q1
200
4Q
4
200
6Q
3
200
8Q
2
2010
Q1
2011
Q4
Inflation-adjusted house prices in Ireland
Actual
Income ratio
But the income ratio is a symptom – not the cause Some of the increase
above the dashed line may not be due to a bubble
It may be because Ireland went from a high interest rate environment to a low one
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
1975
Q1
1979
Q1
198
3Q1
198
7Q1
199
1Q1
199
5Q1
199
9Q
1
200
3Q1
200
7Q1
2011
Q1
Interest rates
Pre-1995 average
Post-1995 average
The ultimate value of real estate comes from the service it offers Income multiples also tell us very little about why
house prices vary spatially
Rents matter – even if you are not a renter or a landlord
One of the most important services in a developed economy’s GDP is “imputed rent”
What would an owner-occupier pay in the rental market to enjoy their accommodation?
The ratio of rents to house prices is the fundamental measure of health in a property market
Rents and house prices reflect a huge range of “non-market” services
Figures show the estimated effect of moving a property from 1km away from a particular amenity to 100 metres away
The ratio of rents to house prices is like the “return” on housing Think like an investor: a property that rents for €800 a
month has an annual rental value of €10,000
Knowing that this property has an annual “dividend” of €10,000, what would you buy this property for?
If you had lots of cash, you would compare the return to, say, interest rates on savings accounts
If you were borrowing, you would compare the return to the cost of borrowing
The rent-to-price ratio is closely related to interest rates
0%
2%
4%
6%
8%
10%
12%
14%
16%
18%
20%
1978
Q1
198
0Q
1
198
2Q1
198
4Q
1
198
6Q
1
198
8Q
1
199
0Q
1
199
2Q1
199
4Q
1
199
6Q
1
199
8Q
1
200
0Q
1
200
2Q1
200
4Q
1
200
6Q
1
200
8Q
1
2010
Q1
Yield
Interest rateRising house prices in 1996 may have been justified by lower interest rates
Perhaps the real damage was done when yields were pulled down by low ECB rates post-2001
What if house prices had reflected rental yields?
€0
€50,000
€100,000
€150,000
€200,000
€250,000
€300,000
€350,000
€400,000
1975
Q1
1976
Q4
1978
Q3
198
0Q
2
198
2Q1
198
3Q4
198
5Q3
198
7Q2
198
9Q
1
199
0Q
4
199
2Q3
199
4Q
2
199
6Q
1
199
7Q4
199
9Q
3
200
1Q2
200
3Q1
200
4Q
4
200
6Q
3
200
8Q
2
2010
Q1
2011
Q4
House prices in Ireland 1975-2011
Actual
Income ratio
Yields
Crystal-ball gazing Asking prices fell by an average of 52% between 2007
and the end of 2011
If asking prices have fallen a further 5% since then and accepted bids are typically 10% below the asking price, then prices are down 58%
The average transaction price now is in the region of €155,000
This is in line with both income multiples and rental multiples…
… but prices won’t actually stabilise until credit returns
Outline
Real estate is a bad investment
The property market is imperfect
Accommodation is a service
Governments can manage the property market
Government can put in place good market foundations Caution: Intervention was part of the problem
As of 2006, the Irish property market the most intervened in among developed economies
In addition to tax breaks for construction and mortgage interest relief, also no annual property tax or capital gains tax!
New intervention has to be aware of the stylised facts of property markets
Three principles will go a long way Sensible land use
E.g. site value tax, which encourages socially beneficial use of land and penalises land banks, derelict sites
Sensible lending
E.g. “covered bonds”: to lend over 30 years, banks must borrow over 30 years – effectively creates culture of fixed rates so Ireland would be less prone to ECB decisions
Sensible borrowing
E.g. improving the “informational infrastructure” – publicly available house price register
Context for property tax Gap between public expenditure and public revenues
added €75bn to national debt 2007-2012 A bigger amount than (even) the banks
Both “spend less” and “tax more” needed unfortunately
With marginal rates of direct and indirect taxation among highest in the OECD, wealth tax the obvious missing link Real estate forms the bulk of wealth in Ireland
Residential property in Ireland still worth ~€300bn
Policy perspective: property tax ‘how’ rather than ‘if ’ Commitments in two Programmes for Government, the National
Recovery Plan 2011‐2014 and Budget 2011
Want to move past Household Charge débacle
Ten Steps to a Property Tax Key points are about
Information
Behaviour
Fairness
Transparency
Step 1: Announce the Choice Put people out of their misery!
Tell people what the system will be
But also tell them:
1. What this was chosen instead of
2. What this replaces
On (1), if not property tax, then 2% higher VAT [or 2% increase in standard rate of income tax]
On (2), a residential property tax should replace 1% stamp duty, 80% windfall gains tax…
Step 2: Finalise the Tax Base For residential property, the tax
base is all land and buildings zoned residential
Land Registry (PRA) contains details on plot sizes and locations for 93% of the country
Supplemented by Geodirectory, Local Government Management Agency, Dublin City Council
Revenue Commissioners, Dept of Social Protection, ESB/Bord Gais for cross-check
Source: Collins & Laraghy 2011
But How?!
Standardised zoning of land (yellow = residential)
So Much information exists already! Myplan.ie already brings
together:
Standardised zoning maps
GeoDirectory
Inventories of unfinished housing, undeveloped residential zoned land
Step 3: Integrate within existing system My understanding of behavioural economics:
Who likes paying €1,250 in one cheque to the Government between Christmas and New Year’s Day?
For PAYE workers, it should be an extra line in the payroll
At-source deduction should be the default – but not compulsory
For others, mostly self-employed, due with their annual returns
These mostly have their own accountant already
Step 4: Self-Assessment Whatever property tax is introduced, informational
infrastructure isn’t in place for a top-down tax
Any property tax will have to be bottom-up (i.e. self-assessment), with auditing
Need information that comes in in Year 1 (the values that will be indexed in future years) to be good quality
Solution: Tax credit (of ~€250) in Year 1 (only) to have property formally assessed by a qualified professional
Step 5: The Checklist A Revenue Commissioner checklist needed to ensure that
all assessors give similar results
Exact contents of list depend on specific tax chosen – SVT needs site-specific features only, full-value needs both
Site-specific features: Size, shape, density according to local development plans, listed
structure on the site
Nearby (dis)amenities (Luas, roads, schools, flood risk, waste facilities, etc.) that may add to (subtract from) value
Property-specific features: Size, property type, number of rooms (of which bedrooms), size of each, number of bathrooms, size of each, number of
outhouses, size of each, BER rating, age of the property, presence of bay windows, presence of double-glazing, converted attic, orientation of the house and gardens (in particular whether south or west facing), number of balconies, utility room, conservatory, under-floor heating, solar panels, fireplace, stove, wet-room, fitted wardrobes, walk-in wardrobes, French doors, high ceilings, recently refurbished, double or triple-glazing…
Step 6: The Deferrals Property tax is not income tax – the motto needs to be:
“no exemptions, only deferrals”
If nothing else, income threshold skews incentives in the labour market, creates a target to “game”
Politics, not economics
Economics would say recycling of properties probably a good thing (family homes inhabited by families)
Candidates for exemptions:
Old-age pensioners (possibly only until 2020?)
Those on low incomes
Those in mortgage arrears (need threshold for this)
Step 7: The Non-Deferrals Tax credits can be used to ensure political fairness and
other social outcomes
An obvious example is tax credits for afforested land
Align social and private incentives
An economic application also (tourism) – helps viability of listed country estates
More pressing debate will be about negative equity
2004-2008 buyers already given income tax relief on their mortgage interest… is this enough (politically)?
Could give same group tax credits (e.g. €5,000 for an individual, €10,000 for a couple) to be used by 2020
Step 8: Auditing Top-down auditing
requires models of real estate values
Oxford-NUIM analysis highlights contours of land value (and like-for-like property values)
Based on an average price over a basket of standardised properties Combined output from a
sales model (ask price) and a lettings model (6% yield)
Methodology Value of property = value of building + value of land
If we know value of a certain property type everywhere, can calculate value of land
Hedonic Price Regression Price for standardised property in every part of the country
Regressions control for measurable property attributes In particular property type and size (measured by bedrooms,
bathrooms)
Square meterage, BER, age would improve the models
Produce an average price for a basket of five standardised properties for each of 4,500 districts in Ireland
Step 9: Local Government reform Will next government simply abolish the property tax?
Its sustainability will be driven by its success – does it help to maintain local services?
Need for (MAJOR!) local government reform Many reports on this sitting on Government shelves
Local government needs responsibility (spending & revenue)
What do local governments do? Education, health, waste, water… libraries & roads?
Do we have too many or too few local authorities? Island has ~6 regional economies – Dublin, Belfast, Cork-
Waterford, Galway-Limerick, Midlands, Sligo-Derry
In Germany, there are 12,000 municipalities (700 for Ireland?!)
Step 10. Local Government autonomy Whatever the exact number of distinct local authorities, for
local responsibility to work, they need autonomy
In Denmark, central government sets minimum possible rate for a local authority (1.6% for site-value tax) Rates vary from 1.6% to 3.4%
What about richer versus poorer areas? Elasticity at work – cheaper areas attract people by having a lower
rate (à la Ireland’s corporate tax rate)
How will redistribution work? Property tax is about funding local services
Consumption tax is about common infrastructure
Income tax is about redistribution
From how to What These ten steps are independent of which particular
property tax system is chosen
What are the choices in property tax? Size-based proposals: major issue is that properties are larger in
rural (less wealthy) areas – potentially regressive
Government has stressed a value-based tax, so there are effectively two choices 1. Banded or %?
2. Full value or site value?
Need only look at experience of the UK to see that bands represent a terrible option Require constant adjustment in annual Budget
Five reasons you’d be mad to choose full value over site value
1. Full-value tax is riddled with perverse incentives
2. Full-value tax struggles with atypical properties
3. Site-value tax hurts speculative land-hoarding
4. Site-value tax shifts the burden from people to land
5. Site-value tax is far easier to assess and to audit
1. Full-Value Tax is riddled with Perverse Incentives If I make my home more energy efficient (say moving from
a C rating to a B rating on my BER), its value increases by roughly 3% Why should our tax system punish someone for boosting Ireland’s
environmental sustainability?
Similarly, if you build an extension over your garage, up goes your property tax bill All you are doing is using your allocation of a scarce resource (land)
better than before
A site-value tax encourages you to use land well Aligns the private cost with the social cost
2. Full-Value Tax struggles with atypical properties Two examples:
1. A listed building on North Great George’s Street Full market value may be €2m - but huge positive externality (on
tourism business)
Site value reflects that use of site is constrained
Equivalent of an in-built tax credit for listed buildings – exactly what you want the tax system to do
2. A country estate on 30 acres, with 25 acres of forest Not often traded – how do you calculate full market value? Include
speculative component?
With site value tax, easy to calculate value of the land
Focus is also only on the residential land – no tax obligation on the forest aligns private and social incentives
3. Site-Value Tax punishes speculative land-hoarding In Year 1 of a site-value tax, two immediate effects in
relation to the supply of residential land Proper understanding of how much of each farm is residential and
how much is agricultural
Dezoning of land still being held speculatively – currently costless to have land residential
Conversely, full-value tax does nothing to stop the type of speculation and land-hoarding that contributed to the last bubble
We will straight away whether there are still decades of lands available – and whether shortages are emerging in Dublin and the other cities
4. Site-value tax shifts the burden from people to land The burden of income and consumption taxes is borne by
people
A full-value property tax has as its unit the dwelling – i.e. the household
The unit being taxed under a site-value tax is the acre: doesn’t affect consumer or labour decisions at the margin
With site-value tax, very easy to shift the tax burden away from people even further with per-person credits Small-scale effects, e.g. four-bed property cheaper for a family with
three kids than a sole occupier
Large-scale effects, i.e. tax shifted from inhabited acre to uninhabited one
5. Last but not least, Site-Value Tax is far easier to do! Site value is a component of
full value – thus, anyone calculating full-value tax has already calculated site value
Checklist for site-value assessment a fraction of the size of checklist for full-value Whether you’ve double-glazing
or not doesn’t affect site value… and arguably shouldn’t affect your property tax bill
What is residential land worth? Estimated site value per acre, by region,
based on basket of five properties
Dublin €840,000 Other cities €335,000 Leinster €150,000 Munster €80,000 Connacht-Ulster €15,000*
What SVT might look like
Property type ED (and decile in country)
Land footprint 2% SVT (Lower bound)
Limerick city-centre one-bed apartment
“Market” ED 5th decile
25 sq.m. (0.6% of an acre)
€24
Limerick city-centre two-bed terraced
“Dock B” ED 6th decile
95 sq.m. (2.6% of an acre)
€52
Limerick suburban three-bed semi-d
“Singland B” ED 5th decile
121 sq.m. (3% of an acre)
€120
Limerick rural four-bed bungalow
“Clonkeen” ED 8th decile
1/2 an acre €400
Limerick suburban five-bed detached
“Ballysimon” ED 5th decile
560 sq.m. (14% of an acre)
€560
An Extended Proposal Or “I want to cut VAT and income tax and still close the
deficit”
Introduce a 10% site value tax on residential property Would raise in the region of €7.5bn – bulk is new revenue
Could then lower VAT and income tax rates to levels more in line with our OECD counterparts
While I’m at it… site-value tax can easily be levied on all types of land Commercial – replace rates, which reward empty premises
Agricultural – rewards productive farmers
Public – internalising costs of occupying a site, would boost local government autonomy
Thank you
Comments, concerns, questions welcome