GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 1
Baseball: It’s Not Nuclear PhysicsBaseball: It’s Not Nuclear Physics(or is it?!)(or is it?!)
Alan M. Nathan Alan M. Nathan
University of IllinoisUniversity of IllinoisGWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999
IntroductionIntroduction
Hitting the BaseballHitting the Baseball
The Flight of the BaseballThe Flight of the Baseball
Pitching the BaseballPitching the Baseball
Summary
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 2
REFERENCESREFERENCES
The Physics of Baseball, Robert K. Adair (Harper Collins,
New York, 1990), ISBN 0-06-096461-8
The Physics of Sports, Angelo Armenti (American Institute of Physics, New York, 1992), ISBN 0-88318-946-1
www.physics.usyd.edu.au/~cross
L. L. Van Zandt, AJP 60, 72 (1991)
www.npl.uiuc.edu/~a-nathan
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 3
Hitting the BaseballHitting the Baseball
“...the most difficult thing to do in sports”
--Ted Williams
BA: .344SA: .634OBP: .483HR: 521
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 4
Speed of Hit Ball:Speed of Hit Ball:What does it depend on?What does it depend on?
Speed is important: 105 mph gives ~400 ft each mph is worth 5 ft
The basic stuff (“kinematics”)
speed of pitched ball
speed of bat
weight of bat The really interesting stuff (“dynamics”)
“bounciness” of ball and bat
weight distribution of bat
vibrations of bat
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 5
What Determines Batted Ball Speed?What Determines Batted Ball Speed?
1. pitched ball speed
2. bat speed
Rigid-Body Kinematics:
Conclusion:Bat Speed Matters More!
V = 0.25 Vball + 1.25 Vbat
20
40
60
80
100
120
140
160
180
0 20 40 60 80 100speed of pitched ball or bat (mph)
vary pitched ball speed
vary bat speed
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 6
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
20 30 40 50 60
mass of bat (oz)
constant bat energy
constant bat+batter energy
60
70
80
90
100
110
120
20 30 40 50 60
mass of bat (oz)
constant bat energy
constant bat speed
constant bat+batter energy
What Determines Batted Ball Speed?What Determines Batted Ball Speed?
3. Mass of bat larger mass lower bat speed
Conclusion:mass of bat matters….but not a lot
bat speed vs mass
ball speed vs mass
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 7
What Determines Batted Ball Speed? What Determines Batted Ball Speed?
4. Inelasticity Ball compresses
kinetic energy stored in “spring”
Ball expandskinetic energy restored but...
70% of energy is lost!
(heat, deformation,vibrations,...)
Forces are large (>5000 lbs!)
Time is short (<1/1000 sec!)
The hands don’t matter!
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1
Time in milliseconds
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
1 104
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
force (pounds)
compression (inches)
approx quadratic
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 8
Inelasticity: The Inelasticity: The CCoefficient oefficient oof f RRestitutionestitution
COR = Vrel,f/Vrel,I COR2 = KEcm,f /KEcm,i
For baseball, COR=.52-.58 Changing COR by .05 changes V by 7 mph (35 ft!)
How to measure? Bounce ball off hard surface COR2 = hf/hi
0
50
100
150
200
0 0.2 0.4 0.6 0.8 1COR
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 9
Energy shared between ball and bat
Ball is inefficient: 25% returned
Wood Bat r~0.02 80% restored
COReff = 0.50-0.51
Aluminum Bat
r~0.10 80% restored COReff = 0.55-0.58
“trampoline effect”
ball flies off the bat!
What About the Bat?What About the Bat?(or, it takes two to tango!)(or, it takes two to tango!)
r Ebat/Eball kball/kbat xbat/ xball
>10% larger!
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 10
Properties of BatsProperties of Bats
length, diameter weight position of center of gravity
where does it balance? distribution of weight
moment of inertia center of percussion stiffness and elasticity
vibrational nodes and frequencies
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 11
60
70
80
90
100
110
10 15 20 25 30 35
distance from knob (inches)
aluminum
wood
Sweet Spot #1: Sweet Spot #1: MMaximum aximum EEnergy nergy TTransferransfer
Barrel end of bat maximizes bat speed
Center of Mass minimizes angular impulse
MET must be in between
MET COP @ 5” from
knob
Aluminum bat more effective
for inside pitches
CM
Alum Wood
xcm 21.9” 19.6”
kch 9.2” 10.2”
kh 23.8” 22.1”
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 12
Sweet Spot #2: Sweet Spot #2: CCenter enter oof f PPercussionercussion
When ball strikes bat... Linear recoil
conservation of momentum Rotation about center of mass
conservation of angular momentum When COP hit
The two motions cancel (at conjugate point) No reaction force felt
x1
x2
x1x2=Icm/M
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 13
Sweet Spot #3: “Node” of VibrationSweet Spot #3: “Node” of Vibration
Collision excites bending
vibrations in bat
Ouch!! Energy lost ==>lower COR Sometimes broken bat
Reduced considerably if collision
is a node of fundamental mode
Fundamental node easy to find For an interesting discussion, see
www.physics.usyd.edu.au/~cross
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 14
Dynamics of Bat-Ball CollisionDynamics of Bat-Ball Collision
Step 1: Solve eigenvalue problem for free vibrations
Step 2: Model force
Step 3: Expand in normal modes and solve
yA x
yEI
x n
2n2
n2
2
2
x
yEI
x - F
t
yA
2
2
2
2
2
2
0
2000
4000
6000
8000
1 104
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7
force (pounds)
compression (inches)
approx quadratic
A
)t(Fq
dt
qd )(y)(q)y( n
n2n2
n2
nn
n xtx,t
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 15
-4
-2
0
2
4
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
Mode 1Mode 2Mode 3
distance from knob (inches)0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
6000
7000
0 2 4 6 8 10
frequency (Hz)
vibrational mode
General ResultsGeneral Results
Excitation of normal mode depends on ... fnT (or T/Tn)
yn at impact point For T 1 ms
only lowest 2 or 3 modes important
(fn=171, 568, 1178, 1851,…)
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 16
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
rigid recoil
losses in ball
ballvibrations
in bat
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
110
18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
Vf (mph)
distance from knob (inches)
rigid bat
realistic bat
RESULTS:
0.15
0.2
0.25
0.3
0.35
0.4
0.45
18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32
|vf/v
i|
distance from knob (inches)
rigid bat
realistic bat
vi = 1 m/s
theory vs. experiment (Rod Cross)at low speed
typical speed
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 17
Advantages of AluminumAdvantages of Aluminum
Length and weight “decoupled”
Can adjust shell thickness
More compressible => “springier”
Trampoline effect
More of weight closer to hands
Easier to swing
Less rotational energy transferred to bat
More forgiving on inside pitches
Stiffer for bending
Less energy lost due to vibrations
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 18
Aerodynamics of a BaseballAerodynamics of a Baseball
Forces on Moving Baseball
No Spin Boundary layer separation DRAG! FD=½CDAv2
With Spin
Ball deflects wake ==>Magnus
force FMRdFD/dv Force in direction front of ball
is turning
Pop
Pbottom
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 19
How Large are the Forces?How Large are the Forces?
• Drag is comparable to weight• Magnus force < 1/4 weight)
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
0 25 50 75 100 125 150Dra
g/W
eig
ht
or
Mag
nu
s/W
eig
ht
Speed in mph
Drag/Weight
Magnus/Weight =1800 RPM
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 20
The Flight of the Ball:The Flight of the Ball:Real Baseball vs. Physics 101 BaseballReal Baseball vs. Physics 101 Baseball
Role of Drag
Role of Spin
Atmospheric conditions Temperature Humidity Altitude Air pressure Wind
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
0 100 200 300 400 500 600 700 800
y (ft)
x (ft)
trajectory
vi = 105 mph @350
no drag
-100
0
100
200
300
400
0 20 40 60 80 100
Range (ft)
q (deg)
Range vs. q
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
500
40 60 80 100 120 140
Range (ft)
vi (mph)
Range vs. vi
approx linear
Max @ 350
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 21
The Role of FrictionThe Role of Friction
Friction induces spin for oblique collisions
Spin Magnus force
Results
Balls hit to left/right break toward foul line
Backspin keeps fly ball in air longer
Topspin gives tricky bounces in infield
Pop fouls behind the plate curve back toward field
batball
topspin ==>F down backspin==>F up
sidespin ==> hook
bat
ball
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 22
The Home Run SwingThe Home Run Swing
• Ball arrives on 100 downward trajectory
• Big Mac swings up at 250
• Ball takes off at 350
•The optimum home run angle!
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 23
Pitching the BaseballPitching the Baseball
“Hitting is timing. Pitching isupsetting timing”
---Warren Spahn
vary speeds manipulate air flow orient stitches
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 24
Let’s Get Quantitative!Let’s Get Quantitative!How Much Does the Ball Break?How Much Does the Ball Break?
Kinematics z=vT x=½(F/M)T2
Calibration 90 mph fastball drops 3.5’ due to
gravity alone Ball reaches home plate in ~0.45
seconds Half of deflection occurs in last 15’ Drag: v -8 mph Examples:
“Hop” of 90 mph fastball ~4” Break of 75 mph curveball ~14”
slowermore rpm force larger
3
4
5
6
7
0 10 20 30 40 50 60Ve
rtic
al
Po
sit
ion
of
Ba
ll (
fee
t)
Distance from Pitcher (feet)
90 mph Fastball
0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1
1.2
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Ho
rizo
nta
l Def
lect
ion
of
Bal
l (fe
et)
Distance from Pitcher (feet)
75 mph Curveball
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 25
Examples of PitchesExamples of Pitches
Pitch V(MPH) (RPM) T M/W
fastball 85-95 1600 0.46 0.10
slider 75-85 1700 0.51 0.15
curveball 70-80 1900 0.55 0.25
What about split finger fastball?
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 26
Effect of the StitchesEffect of the Stitches
Obstructions cause turbulance
Turbulance reduces dragDimples on golf ballStitches on baseball
Asymmetric obstructions
Knuckleball
Two-seam vs. four-seam delivery
Scuffball and “juiced” ball
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 27
SummarySummary
Much of baseball can be understood with basic principles of physics
Conservation of momentum, angular momentum, energy
Dynamics of collisions
Excitation of normal modes
Trajectories under influence of forces
gravity, drag, Magnus,….
There is probably much more that we don’t understand
Don’t let either of these interfere with your enjoyment of the game!
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 28
What Determines Batted Ball Speed?What Determines Batted Ball Speed?A Simple FormulaA Simple Formula
ibat,iball,fball, vr1
e1 v
r1
r-e v
1.2 1.3 x .15 k
z-z1
m
m r
0.5 nrestitutio oft coefficien e2
CM
bat
ball
Conservation of momentum, energy, and angular momentum:
radius of gyration
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 29
How Would a Physicist Design a Bat?How Would a Physicist Design a Bat?
Wood Bat already optimally designed
highly constrained by rules! a marvel of evolution!
Aluminum Bat lots of possibilities exist but not much scientific research a great opportunity for ...
fame fortune
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 30
Example 1: FastballExample 1: Fastball
85-95 mph1600 rpm (back)12 revolutions0.46 secM/W~0.1
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 31
Example 2: Split-Finger FastballExample 2: Split-Finger Fastball
85-90 mph1300 rpm (top)12 revolutions0.46 secM/W~0.1
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 32
Example 3: CurveballExample 3: Curveball
70-80 mph1900 rpm
(top and side)17 revolutions0.55 secM/W~0.25
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 33
Example 4: SliderExample 4: Slider
75-85 mph1700 rpm (side)14 revolutions0.51 secM/W~0.15
GWU Colloquium, October 21, 1999 Page 34
Note: both ball and racket compress