Page 1Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
American Conference InstituteLicensing Software in a Global Market
Emile Loza, JD, MBA, CLPFounding Attorney
Technology Law GroupBoise, Idaho
Page 2Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Key Points
• Strategic intelligence is key to:– Tactical advantage in negotiations– Control of IP rights flow– Drafting precision & self-enforcing agreements
• Globally harmonized terms, as possible, are key to:• Operational & drafting efficiency
• Legal risk management
• Tax treaty-optimized terms are key to:– Net income to licensor– Minimized double taxation– Tax compliance
Page 3Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Strategic Intelligence
Scenario: • Licensor – U.S.-based computer company with
assertion-driven WW technology licensing program for hardware, software & materials.
• Licensees – manufacturing & design suppliers and distributors HQ’d in Far East (Taiwan, Korea & Japan).
Strategic Intelligence Needs:• Company Dossier• Affiliates List• Command & Control Matrix Report• Litigation History Report• Spot Intelligence Reports
Page 4Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Strategic Intelligence – Dossier Components
• Executive summary• Existing connections with licensor• Company snapshot• Key executives (Command & Control Matrix)• Shareholders• Products• Major customers (channels)• Major suppliers
Page 5Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Command & Control List
Page 6Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Command & Control Matrix
Page 7Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Geolocation – Trace Routing of IP Addresses
*Resources:www.samspade.orgwww.visualroute.com.
Page 8Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Strategic Intelligence – Dossier Components (cont’d)
• Performance Analysis– Selected financial data (projected &
historical).– Shipments; units sold (projected &
historical).– Market share, awards & industry ratings.
• Strategy Analysis– Marketing & R&D strategies. – Licensing & other IP activities.– Mergers & JVs, acquisitions
& divestitures.
Page 9Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Strategic Intelligence – Dossier Components (cont’d)
• Subsidiary Analysis– Alpha by name (include name variants,
transliterations, foreign character sets).– Ownership hierarchy.– Potential infringement targets.– Geographical markets & jurisdictional
contacts.• Extensive, dated citations to source materials
Page 10Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Strategic Intelligence – Substantiating Sources
• Source qualifiers• Confirming sources• Dates & URLs• Archival
Page 11Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
What Bacon Knew About Licensing
Knowledge is Power!Sir Francis Bacon, ReligiousMeditations – Of Heresies (1597)
Image © Elizabethan Era
Page 12Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Subsidiary Analysis & IP Rights Flow
Specialty mfg
entity
Know Thy Partner!
Page 13Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Subsidiary Analysis & IP Rights Flow
WW distribution
chain-Germany HQ’d
Far East-based
wholesaler
R&D entities
Parent
Chinese mfg entity
BVIholding company
Retail entities
CONTROL ENTITY
Newly acquired
entity
Real World ExampleControl entity has ~150
subsidiaries & >1K locations.
Specialty mfg
entity
Page 14Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Subsidiary Analysis & IP Rights Flow
Specialty mfg
entity
WW distribution
chain-Germany HQ’d
Far East-based
wholesaler
R&D entities
Parent
Chinese mfg entity
BVIholding company
Retail entities
CONTROL ENTITY
Newlyacquired
entity
Control entity has ~150 subsidiaries.
LICENSOR CONTRACTS HERE.
Page 15Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Subsidiary Analysis & IP Rights Flow
Specialty mfg
entity
WW distribution
chain-Germany HQ’d
Far East-based
wholesaler
R&D entities
Parent
Chinese mfg entity
BVIholding company
Retail entities
CONTROL ENTITY
Newly acquired
entity
RIGHTS FLOW HERE
Page 16Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Subsidiary Analysis & IP Rights Flow
Specialty mfg
entity
WW distribution
chain-Germany HQ’d
Far East-based
wholesaler
R&D entities
Parent
Chinese mfg entity
BVIholding company
Retail entities
CONTROL ENTITY
Newly acquired
entity
PRODUCTS SHOW UP HERE
Page 17Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Affiliates List
• Determine Affiliates List from Dossier.– Identify all known relevant companies
related to potential licensee. – Uses:
• Counter-assertion risk analysis.
• “Licensed Subsidiaries” addendum.
• Enforcement strategy.
Page 18Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Intelligence-Powered Drafting
• Party Identification
–Complete name (Commas & abbreviations count!)
–D&B, EIN, registration & other numbers
Page 19Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Intelligence-Powered Drafting
• Considerations:– Industry consolidation. – Control of rights flow.– Competitive defense
• Better Drafting Practices:– Definitions for Subsidiary, Licensed Subsidiary,
Former Subsidiary, After-Acquired Subsidiary.– Licensed Subsidiary Addendum.
– Duty extensions as to reporting, payment & audit.
Page 20Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Intelligence-Powered Drafting
Page 21Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Licensed Subsidiary Addendum
Page 22Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Intelligence-Powered Royalty Reporting
Page 23Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Globally-Harmonized Terms (A Brief Note)
Scenario: • Licensor – US-HQ’d digital advertising company with Canada-based subsidiary & servers for global online distribution of software and access to software.
• Licensees – large grocery chains, big box stores, medical offices, malls; distributors with networks of end-users.
Legal & Operational Needs:• Minimize legal expense.• Implementation efficiency.• Minimize legal risk.
Page 24Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Globally-Harmonized Terms (A Brief Note)
Arbitration to Unify & Reduce Risk• Arbitration agreement addendum• Choice of law• Choice of forum (AAA, ICC, etc.)• Importation of Federal Rules of Civil Procedures & Evidence
• Arbitral v. Non-arbitral Issues– Contract formation– Patent validity
• Cost, secrecy & binding and precedential effect
Page 25Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Royalty Taxation
Painting by Alex Gross. www.alexgross.com. Used with permission.
Page 26Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Typical, But Inadequate, Drafting
“All taxes imposed due to the performance of the parties under this Agreement shall be paid by the party required to do so by the applicable law.”
Page 27Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Business & Legal Concerns
• Tax & financial planning– In-country taxation reduces net deal value.– Predicted v. actual cash flow?
• What is the “applicable law”?– Conflicts between choice of law provision &
requirements imposed by in-country law.– Tax treaties – no opt-out.
• Licensor liability in foreign jurisdiction.
• Contract management issues
Page 28Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Tax Treaty-Optimized Terms
Scenario 1: Digital advertising company licensing distributors & end-users in the EU. Needs – Maximize net income into Canada orUS; minimize double taxation; avoid “permanent establishment” elsewhere.
Scenario 2: Global computer company with footprints & licensees in Korea & Taiwan. Needs – Maximize net income; minimize double taxation; ensure tax compliance.
Page 29Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
NoNoTaiwanYesYesSwitzerlandYesYesMexicoYesYesIndiaYesYesFranceYesYesCzech RepublicYesYesChina
Yes (15%)No (30%)BrazilYesYesAustria
Canada Bilateral Tax Treaty
US Bilateral Tax Treaty
Jurisdiction
Scenario 1: Sample Royalty Taxation
Page 30Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Scenario 2: Royalty Taxation in Korea
• International law governs.– United States-Republic of Korea Income Tax
Convention, Article 14 (Signed at Seoul June 4, 1976) (Entry into force Oct. 23, 1979).∗
∗Resources:• PricewaterhouseCoopers, Doing Business and Investing –
Global Intelligence from PricewaterhouseCoopers – Korea 429-36 (2002).
• U.S. Internal Revenue Service:– Treaty text, http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-trty/korea.pdf.– Technical Explanation, http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-
utl/koreatrweb.pdf.• Korea’s National Tax Service: Generally
http://www.nta.go.kr/eng/default.html.
Page 31Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Varying Royalty Rates Under the Treaty
• Generally, where a resident of one of the two Contracting States derives royalties from sources within the other Contracting State, that other Contracting State may impose a maximum tax burden of 15% of gross royalties. See Art. 14(1).
Page 32Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Exemption from Royalty Taxation
• Exempt when licensor is resident of one Contracting State, but has “permanent establishment” in the other Contracting State and when IP from which royalties arise is “effectively connected” with that permanent establishment.– Arts. 14(3) & 6(b). If exempt, royalties are
treated as business profits, and taxation basis is reduced by expenses reasonably connected with those profits. Arts. 14(3) & 8(b).
Page 33Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Article 6(b) Connection Factors
• Factors to determine whether IP from which royalties arise is “effectively connected” with “permanent establishment.”
– Whether IP used in or held for use incarrying permanent establishment’s industrial or commercial activities.
– Whether activities carried on through permanent establishment are material factor in income realization from IP.
Page 34Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Proof of Tax Payment in Korea
Certificate for Non-resident’s Tax Payment
Page 35Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
• Certificate should be timely completed and filed with the royalty withholding by the licensee with Korean tax authorities.
• Upon filing, tax authorities acknowledge payment with signatures and stamps or chops.
Proof of Tax Payment in Korea
Page 36Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
• Licensee Obligations:–Timely file Certificate & pay withholding,
preferably by dates certain.–Timely provide licensor copy of filed
Certificate.–Warrant and represent Certificate &
withholding as complete, timely & correct.
Better Drafting Practice
Page 37Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
• Domestic law governs as to royalties to US licensors.– Income Tax Act, 2006/9/11.∗
• International law as to some other countries having bilateral tax treaties with Taiwan.∗
∗Resources:• English translations of domestic laws: ROC Ministry of Finance, Related
Laws and Regulations, <http://www.mof.gov.tw/engWeb/mp.asp?mp=2>; ROC Ministry of Justice, Laws and Regulations Database of the Republic of China, <http://law.moj.gov.tw/eng/>.
• Treaties: Ministry of Finance, http://www.dot.gov.tw/en/display/list.asp.
Royalty Taxation in Republic of China (Taiwan)
Page 38Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
15%Vietnam10%United Kingdom10%South Africa15%Singapore10%Netherlands10%Indonesia10%Gambia
12.5%Australia20%Non-treaty Countries
Royalty Withholding Rate
Jurisdiction
Sample Tax Treaties & Withholding Rates of Taiwan
Page 39Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Royalty Tax Withholding Documentation
• Licensee to file a Republic of China Withholding & Non-withholding Tax Statement upon royalty payment to foreign licensor.– Payor & payee.– Payment particulars, including total
amount paid & period for payment. – Withholding rate applied– Net tax withheld– Net payment wired or otherwise
transmitted to licensor.– Reported in NT$.
Page 40Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Alternate Approaches Under Taiwan’s Tax Law
1. Instead of withholding tax, licensee may apply for income tax refund for royalties paid to a foreign licensor under Article 4.21 of Taiwan’s Income Tax Act
– To facilitate application, licensor must appoint licensee as its representative for matters related to pursuing that application with the Taiwanese authorities.
– Better practice – Revocable appointment.
2. Others?
Page 41Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Better Drafting Practice
• Agree as to applicable tax law.∗
• Caution as to treaty shopping.• Licensee’s indemnification of licensor for any
foreign tax liability arising from licensee’s failure to timely & accurately file tax documents & pay withholdings to relevant tax authorities.
∗Resources:• Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development• ABA’s International Law Section, www.abanet.org/intlaw. • ASIL’s Guide to Electronic Resources for International Law,
www.asil.org/resource/pil1.htm. • International Legal Materials • Treaties in Force
Page 42Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
www.TechnologyLawGroup.com
Key Take-Aways
• Strategic intelligence is key to:– Tactical advantage in negotiations– Control of IP rights flow– Drafting precision & self-enforcing agreements
• Globally harmonized terms, as possible, are key to:• Operational & drafting efficiency
• Legal risk management
• Tax treaty-optimized terms are key to:– Maximized net income to licensor– Minimized double taxation– In-country compliance
Page 43Oct. 21, 2008 All rights reserved. This presentation does not provide or constitute legal or tax advice.
Thank You!
Emile Loza, JD, MBA, CLPFounding Attorney
Technology Law GroupBoise, Idaho