Integrating EPI and Family Planning Service Delivery
in Liberia
Background, Rationale, Integration Model
1
THE NATIONAL CONTEXT: POSTPARTUM FAMILY
PLANNING
2
41% of birth-to-pregnancy intervals in Liberia are too close for healthy outcomes
3Source: MCHIP Re-analysis of 2007 Liberia DHS
At Risk of Pregnancy
4
0%
10%
20%
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
80%
90%
100%
0-5.9 6-11.9 12-23.9
Sexually active Return to menses
Excl. Bfeeding Predominant Bfeeding
5%
10%14%14%
6% 1%0%
20%
40%
60%
80%
100%
0-5.9 Mos 6-11.9 Mos 12-23.9 Mos
Modern FP Use Predominant BF
Risk of Pregnancy Among Sexually Active
Women Across Postpartum Periods
Factors Affecting Return to Fertility Among Postpartum
Women
Analysis of 2007 Liberia DHS FP Data
WHAT DOES IT MEAN TO “INTEGRATE” SERVICES?
5
WHY INTEGRATE EPI AND FAMILY PLANNING?
6
7
Both immunization and family planning
save lives…
…and are part of a comprehensive approach to
MNCH
Family planning helps couples to achieve healthy timing and spacing of pregnancies; prevent unintended pregnancies
Immunizations are one of the most effective and highly used child health preventive services
Increasing access to postpartum family planning contributes to achievement of child health goals.
9
EPI provides multiple opportunities to reach postpartum women during an important
period.
Through child immunizations, mothers have multiple contacts with health providers in the year after birth
During the 12 months following birth, women may be very open to hearing messages about FP
10
Why are FP Services for Postpartum Women a High Priority?
During the first year after birth, or the extended postpartum period, most women want to delay or avoid future pregnancies but many are not using a modern FP method
Pregnancies spaced too closely can lead to health risks for the mother and child
11
Potential Benefits for Service Providers
Saves time by maximizing opportunities to provide multiple services on same day (rather than having a client return multiple times on different days)
Increased efficiency, improved client flow
Increased communication, flow of information across service areas
Builds providers’ technical skill & confidence
12
The Global Dialogue
Growing interest in FP/immunization integration
Emerging program experiences in Rwanda, Ghana, Zambia, Mali, Philippines
Limited documentation exists on effects of integration on FP & immunization outcomes, (especially for immunization outcomes)
FP/Immunization Working Group established in 2010 to exchange experiences, resources, identify successful integration strategies
Integrated EPI/FP service delivery Possible effects on immunization
Precedent: possible concerns
Cameroon & Philippines (early 1990s) – halted EPI 2-3 years
Madagascar (2004-2005) – confusion during MCH Weeks with FP and tetanus toxoid for women
Northern Nigeria (2004-2006) – oral polio vaccine viewed as sterilizing agent
Pakistan (2012– ) – rumors that vaccination sterilizes children disruption of polio campaigns, disruption of routine immunization, many measles outbreaks
Most problems associated with political conflict or mass immunization campaigns
Indicates need for careful planning and monitoring with attention to effect on immunization
Positive effects of EPI/FP integration for EPI?
Not consistently documented Rwanda (2011-2012): improvement in FP
and immunization coverage remained high Togo (1994): 54% increase in new
contraceptive acceptors and immunization coverage remained high
Liberia: MOHSW/MCHIP has actively monitored effect on immunization
15
Possible strategies for engaging immunization
community
16
Overview of MOHSW/ MCHIP EPI/FP
Integration Approach
17
Background
MoHSW and MCHIP tested an approach to link EPI and FP services in 5 facilities in Bong County and 5 facilities in Lofa County
Pilot phase of implementation lasted 9 months (March 2012-November 2012)
18
Site Selection
Participating health facilities included: Bong County: Phebe Hospital, Garmu Clinic,
Zoweinta Clinic, Salala Clinic, Fenutoli Clinic Lofa County: Curran Lutheran Hospital, Borkeza
Clinic, Kpaiyea Clinic, Ganglota Clinic, Gbonyea Clinic
Rationale for selection: Counties with stronger EPI performance Facilities in various proximities to the road 1 hospital and 4 clinics in each county
19
The Integration Model
Combined service provision, with same-day referrals from the vaccinator to co-located FP services
Focus on fixed facilities
Strategically designed materials reinforce key messages (job aid, leaflet, poster)
20
Sequence of Activities
21
THE PROCESS
22
Role of Vaccinators
During routine child immunization sessions, at the completion of each immunization visit, vaccinators will:
1)Remind mothers when they need to bring their child back for the next vaccination
2)Use a simple job aid to share brief, targeted FP messages with caregivers
3)Ask mothers whether they are interested in going for family planning services that day
23
For caregivers who ARE interested in seeking family planning on the same day:
Vaccinators give them a referral card and tell them to give it to the FP provider
Vaccinators direct them toward the FP room
Record on the register that the caregiver was referred (using the supplemental EPI/FP register)
24
Role of Vaccinators
For caregivers who are NOT interested in going for FP on the same day:
Vaccinators give them the leaflet about the benefits of FPVaccinators encourage them to discuss FP with their partner and family membersVaccinators encourage them to return to the facility soon
25
Role of Vaccinators
Role of Family Planning Providers
Family planning providers:
(1)Collect the referral card from the clients referred from EPI(2)Provide FP counseling and services to women referred(3)Record in their legers (in the comments section) that the woman was referred from EPI, and whether she selected an FP method ( = referred, counseled and chose a method, = referred, counseled and did not choose a method)(4)Return the referral cards at the end of the day to the vaccinators’ room
26
Variations in Approach Across Facilities
Registration
Referral processes – Expedited referrals?
Privacy screens for facilities where EPI is provided in open waiting area
27
Key Inputs Required
28
START-UP
•Initial stakeholder meetings•Formative assessment to inform design•Initial training + practical exercises for Vaccinators & CMs (3 days)•Orientation for Supervisors (1 day)•Pre-testing Materials•Printing Materials
RECURRENT
•Refresher training for service providers and supervisors (1-2 Days)•Re-print materials as needed•Monthly supportive supervision visits•County and National-level advocacy to ensure sufficient commodity supply•Semi-regular stakeholder meetings to share progress
Questions?
29
Thank you!
wwww.mchip.net
Follow us on: