In s i gh t s t oday f o r t omorrow’s dec i s i on s
W i n t e r 2 0 0 1
The Consumerization of Rx Products
Meeting the Category Pricing Challenge: Finding a Simple Path
A Look at Global Megabrands
Category Masters of the Year
Trend Watch: Biotechnology
Radio Frequency ID:A New Era for Marketers?
CONSUMERINSIGHT:
Understanding
the Voice of
the Consumer
For More Information
ACNielsen U.S.150 North Martingale RoadSchaumburg, IL 60173800.988.4ACNhttp://acnielsen.com/ci
ACNielsen Canada160 McNabb StreetMarkham, OntarioL3R 4B8, Canadahttp://www.acnielsen.ca
Winter 2001, Volume 3, No. 4
4Radio Frequency ID:
A New Era for Marketers?While many advances in technology have
made the CPG industry more efficient, few havetransformed the way we market to consumers.
The new advances in Radio Frequency ID have the potential to change this.
8The Consumerization of Rx Products
Before 1984, many of the top-selling OTC medications were available only by prescription.
The switch from Rx to OTC has had a profound impact on how manufacturers
market, how retailers merchandise, and howconsumers purchase these products.
13Meeting the Category Pricing ChallengePricing is one of the more risky elements
of Marketing. Mistakes can cost your brand dearly. By using a strategic framework
for category pricing, one can drive profitability for the brand and the category.
19A Look at Global Megabrands
What does it mean to be global? According to ACNielsen’s Global Services,
there are 23 manufacturers responsible for the large global brands today.
24Category Masters of the Year
For the third year, the annual Category Master of the Year awards were presented
at ACNielsen’s Category Masters conference.This year’s winners had something in common: a desire to collaborate.
In every issue…28 Trend Watch—
Biotechnology
Business Tools30 Consumer Behavior
32 Merchandising
33 Retailers
33 KnowledgeWorks
34 Retail Tracking
36 Custom Research
Volume 3, No. 4
Publisher
ACNielsen
Editors
Mark Chesney
Art Massa
Design & Layout
Marina Quaranta
Editorial Board
Gary Binkoski
Margaret James
Kathy Mancini
Elaine Noone
Mark Puccetti
ACNielsen Global Creative Services
Laurel A. Kennedy Marketing/Communications
Slack Barshinger & Partners
Copyright © 2002 ACNielsen. Printed in USA. All rights reserved. ACNielsen, the ACNielsen logo, ACNielsen Workstation Information✽ Server,Category Masters, Homescan, KnowledgeWorks,Priceman, Scantrack and Spaceman are trademarksor registered trademarks of A.C. Nielsen Company.Other brand, product or service names are trademarksor registered trademarks of their respective companies.
3
It is a time to
continue the
momentum of
building your
brand with
existing
consumers and
key prospects.
whose growth rates increased
in Q2 and Q3 included cost-
effective frozen unprepared
foods and comfort foods such
as frozen desserts, ice cream
and pizza/snacks.
• The alcoholic beverages depart-
ment ($15.7 billion) is another
which has experienced a slow-
ing growth rate. Beer, liquor
and wine have all seen growth
rate declines in Q2 and Q3.
As for what happened as a result
of the events of 9/11, we saw
behavioral changes like stocking
up on bottled water, canned
goods, flashlights and batteries.
• Other categories that went up
noticeably in the weeks follow-
ing 9/11 included baby food,
coffee, cookies, crackers,
peanut butter, jelly, milk (fresh,
powdered, shelf-stable and
canned), and at least one prod-
uct that had been in decline:
prepared foods (both dry mixes
and ready-to-serve). Among
non-food products, those that
spiked up included candles and
food storage containers. The
HBA department showed a
decline, as people apparently
took their attention off of
personal care items and focused
on essential food products.
While some companies will con-
tinue to be hurt by the lingering
effects of the terrorist attack—
In these unique and trying
times, many of you have
asked us about the impact of
the weakening economy and the
tragic events of September 11th.
While some of the findings below
are not surprising, I believe that
such trends present the CPG
industry with equal doses of
challenges and opportunities.
While the dollar sales growth
rate in most departments went
up during Q1, in seven of the 11
departments we monitor (repre-
senting 72% of total dollar sales),
the growth rate declined in Q2
and Q3. Unit volume growth rates
for nine of the 11 departments
also declined in Q2 and Q3.
Drilling down a bit further...
• The dry grocery department,
($145.6 billion across f/d/m
combined), is one of the
declining departments. Some
of the categories that showed
slower dollar volume growth
rates in Q2 and Q3 included
prepared foods, coffee, car-
bonated beverages, crackers,
pet food, shortening/oil, soup
and canned vegetables.
• The frozen department ($28.9
billion) is another of the seven
decliners. Among the frozen
categories that have declined
were frozen prepared foods
and frozen vegetables. Those
Continued on page 27
| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
Trying Times Present CPGIndustry with Challenges & Opportunities
Tim Callahan
President
ACNielsen U.S.
Cover StoryC
onsu
mer
Ins
ight
| W
inte
r 20
01|
4
© David Gould and Steven Hunt/Getty Images/The Image Bank.
Evolutionary theory holds that more adaptable species
will prevail in the primordial jungle. Darwinian economic
theory holds that adaptable methods of communication
will prevail in the commercial jungle as well. The emer-
gence of pervasive commerce, the latest development
in the technology of convergent economics, serves as a
case in point.
Sometimes dubbed the quiet revolution, pervasive com-
merce is redefining the CPG landscape with technologies
like smart labels embedded with transmitting sensors and
intelligent readers built into key areas where consumers
live and work. Wearable scanners convert painstaking
inventory control exercises into a real-time action as sim-
ple as the nod of a head. Objects speak to objects in an
unheard language, serving the interests of consumers and
producers via always-on, always-aware, always-active
pervasive c6ommerce initiatives.
From Bar Codes to Loyalty CardsTechnology first made its mark on the CPG trade when
bar codes debuted on June 26, 1974, at Marsh’s
Supermarket in Troy, Ohio, ushering in a new era of
high-speed checkout and data collection. Although bar
codes yielded significant efficiency and accuracy benefits,
they proved to be just a better way to capture and track
product sales and volume information.
The next “big thing”? Frequent shopper cards. While these
did a better job of linking consumers and their purchases,
loyalty cards were severely limited by the constraint of a
single retailer view. This skewed perspective gave retailers
a view of in-store loyalty trends, but it only let them see
the fraction of consumer spending at that format.
In addition to the constricting chain and channel blinders
of scanner data and loyalty cards, consider the usage,
| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
5
by John Stermer
Senior Vice President
eBusiness Market Development
ACNielsen
Radio Frequency ID:A New Era for Marketers?
Cover StoryC
onsu
mer
Ins
ight
| W
inte
r 20
01|
6
consumer demographic, psychographic and economic
blind spots of tracking data. Consumer panel information
was added to fill the gaps left by traditional tracking
information, and has been a step in the right direction.
However, something more integrated and holistic was
needed to provide a ubiquitous understanding of on- and
off-line consumer purchase behavior, attitudes and prod-
uct usage. The answer: RFID (radio frequency identifica-
tion) technology.
RFID: A True Paradigm ShiftRFID represents the first true breakthrough in the CPG
industry since the beginning of marketing time. Not just
an efficiency enhancement, but a true paradigm shift—
one that offers the potential to connect consumer pur-
chase to consumer usage across all classes of trade. RFID
technology actually can enable tracking of a product
through the entire life cycle, from the production line all
the way to the recycling center.
Each RFID tag is equipped with a digital memory chip
bearing a unique electronic product code (EPC). As envi-
sioned by the MIT Auto-ID Center, every smart label
would contain up to 96 bits of information, including a
40 bit serial number. Conceptually, the RFID tag is an ele-
gant combination of the UPC with an Internet IP address,
allowing detailed information for each product.
Products with RFID embedded in labels can continuously
transmit information ranging from a unique EPC, to con-
sumption status, to environmental conditions like temper-
ature and moisture content that impact product freshness.
In an industry first, RFID enables the linking of all this
product information with a specific consumer identified
by key demographic and psychographic markers.
The Great EnablerThree words best capture the major benefits of pervasive
commerce: speed, accuracy and savings. The pace of com-
merce accelerates from rapid to immediate, at distances
up to seven meters, despite the presence of dirt, wood,
steam, ice, plastic, paint, water or even people.
Accuracy improves from very good to near-perfect, at a
scant one error in 100 million reads. Savings range with
the application, but Swisscom, Switzerland’s largest
telecommunications company, reports that it has slashed
the cost of even the smallest purchase transaction by as
much as 70%.
As of this writing, a group of thought leaders in the CPG
world are putting pervasive commerce to the test. In the
business-to-business venue, ACNielsen, along with
Accenture, Philip Morris, Procter & Gamble and Wal-Mart,
are part of a 36-company consortium called Auto ID Center,
currently wiring the city of Tulsa, Oklahoma, with RFID
equipment for tracking microchip-equipped packages. The
objective is to tag “everything that moves,” and trace goods
from plant to pallet to store shelf, in real time, without
human intervention.
Future Perfect Fully implemented, a pervasive commerce network could
work like this. Consumers armed with their personal digital
assistant (e.g., Palm Pilot, Visor, Blackberry), electronically
stroll the aisles of a virtual grocery store, downloading rele-
vant pricing information, menu suggestions, product and
ingredient specifics provided via wireless RFID transmissions.
Ticking off desired items on an electronic shopping list,
sell-downs are taken automatically, the order is placed via
the Internet, along with payment authorization, delivery
preference, address and driving directions. As each order
moves out the door, a portal reader records purchased
items, verifies accuracy, updates inventory at the retailer
and manufacturer, and transmits replenishment data, all
via satellite to Internet-resident databases.
Once at the home, intelligent refrigerators and
microwaves interpret smart labels to monitor storage
requirements, maintain the appropriate temperature and
humidity, determine cooking procedures and update the
family shopping list based on actual consumption.
The Missing LinkThe intelligent microwave and refrigerator loom as first
order RFID applications—good news for CPG marketers,
since 75% of the consumer products ACNielsen tracks
can be found in the bathroom or kitchen. Where once we
collected purchase information, now we can correlate
multiple points of consumer product purchase with con-
sumption specifics such as the how, when and who of
product use.
| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
7
One key to pervasive commerce success is the guarantee
of 100% compliance after installation. After securing a
consumer agreement to participate, the self-monitoring
infrastructure is put in place and operates unsupervised.
Much like the current ACNielsen NetRatings product,
pervasive commerce deploys non-intrusive, passive tech-
nology. Today, ACNielsen Homescan panelists use a
handheld scanner. Tomorrow, they’ll simply have to load
the mini-van, walk in the door, or open the refrigerator
for purchases to be recorded.
Pervasive Commerce and Object IQsOne point of hot debate in the RFID arena involves the
issue of object intelligence. While RFID is a very com-
pelling and elegant technology enabler, ACNielsen believes
that real value is derived only by linking the RFID to a
source of intelligence. True intelligence still resides with
the people who program these collection networks, inter-
preting and analyzing ever richer and more robust data.
The elegant enabler known as pervasive commerce requires
a reference architecture robust enough to recognize and
categorize every product and every retailer at every venue
in the U.S. including shopping malls, convenience stores,
mass merchandisers, food and drug stores. To realize the
full capability of pervasive commerce, ACNielsen has
invested in a multi-year effort toward this goal, developing
in-depth massive product reference databases, called
Product Reference, as well as the store-specific geographic
database called Trade Dimension (TD) Linx.
TD Linx captures more than 40 individual attributes per
product, including supply side characteristics such as case
and pallet, product characteristics such as weight and cat-
egory, digital images of each product, a standard industry
postal code and geographic availability data.
While there may be some debate about the intelligence of
objects, there is no debate that pervasive commerce, intel-
ligently deployed, will redefine the competitive landscape
for the CPG industry.
The basic operating principles of pervasive com-merce are pretty straightforward. In a typical RFID (radio frequency identification) system, each objectis equipped with a small, inexpensive tag (thetransponder) containing a digital memory chip thatbears a unique electronic product code.The inter-rogator, an antenna packaged with a transceiverand decoder, emits a signal activating the RFID tagso it can read and write data to it, then transferthat information to the host computer for furtherprocessing. The market for RFID tags is growingexplosively, projected to reach $10 billion annuallywithin the decade, according to IDTechEx.
RFID tags boast some unusual properties:
1] Data can be changed as the product navigates
the distribution system, from factory location
and date of manufacture, to anti-counterfeiting,
pricing, warranty or other product information.
2] When electronic display technologies such as electronic inks hit the market, manufacturers will be able to dynamically change text on the package, updating advertising, safety and quality statements.
3] Sensitive microprocessors will be able to monitor the product environment to
ensure that foods arrive fresh, shipped under the correct temperature and moisture conditions.
How It Works
RFID products in home RFID in car
© Siegfried Layda/Getty Images/Stone.
FeatureC
onsu
mer
Ins
ight
| W
inte
r 20
01|
8
by Bart Roselli
VP, New Business Development
ACNielsen
The Consumerization of Rx Products
Success or leadership as an Rx product does not ensure leadership as an OTC product.
Recent Rx to OTC SwitchAs an Rx Brand As a Consumer Brand
(share to switch segment) ($)
Brand Segment OTC CategoryBrand Position Share of Rx’s Position Share Share
Brand A 54 Brand A 26.6 9.8
Brand B 24 Brand B 9.7 3.3
Brand C 13 Brand C 42.5 17.1
Brand D 9 Brand D 2.5 1.0
Pvt. Label 18.6 7.1
Chart 1Consumerization of Rx Products
| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
9
New Health Care DecisionsVisit any drug store, supermarket or mass merchan-
diser and products such as Advil, Kaopectate, Afrin,
Aleve, Gyne-Lotrimin, Pepcid AC, Zantac 75,
Rogaine and Nicorette Gum are all readily available.
For some, it is hard to consider life without their
easy accessibility, but before 1984 all of these drugs
required a doctor’s prescription. Rising health-care
costs, HMO involvement, easy access to health care
information and the explosion of direct-to-consumer
advertising are just some of the reasons behind the
expanding availability of over-the-counter (OTC)
drugs reclassified from prescription status.
Proponents believe this availability allows consumers
to take a more active role in their own health care
and serves to reduce overall health-care costs.
Opponents argue that forcing patients to self-
diagnose and self-treat takes the doctor out of the
equation and raises questions about the quality of
the patient’s care. There is also concern about the
increased cost to the consumer, since OTC drugs are
generally not covered by healthcare insurance.
A Profound ImpactThe switch from prescription (Rx) to OTC has a
profound impact on the manufacturers that produce
the drug, the manufacturers of competing drugs
and the retailers that merchandise these products.
Consider the introduction of non-prescription smok-
ing cessation products. Their introduction in 1995
created a new over-the-counter category and caused
a 41,000-percent dollar volume increase in 1996.
Prior to their introduction, sales of OTC nicotine
replacement generated just $300,000 in sales across
all retail channels in 1995.
In some cases, a prescription product may impact the
sales of an existing OTC category. Consider the
impact the new blockbuster prescription drugs Vioxx
and Celebrex are having on the OTC analgesics
category. Are the users switchers from existing
analgesic products? Are they still purchasing OTC
analgesics in addition to their prescription? These
questions can be answered through additional
research. What is known, however, is that the aware-
ness of these prescription products is extraordinary.
For perspective, according to Nielsen Media Research,
these two products spent $225 million in direct-to-
consumer advertising in the year 2000. Moreover,
the industry spent $2.2 billion in direct-to-consumer
advertising last year.
Does Success TranslateThe success or leadership as a prescription product does
not ensure leadership as an OTC product. Research
shows that while prescription products do carry their
brand equity as they move to OTC status, it does not
necessarily translate into a similar OTC share.
In Chart 1, Brand A maintained a 54 share of prescrip-
tions as a prescription brand, but as a consumer brand,
it now only delivers a 26.6 share of the OTC segment
(prescription products) and a 9.8 share of the total
category. Interestingly, Brand C went from a low 13
share of prescriptions to a whopping 42.5 share of the
segment and 17.1 share of the total category. It is impor-
tant to note that private label captured an 18.6 share of
the previous prescription segment, nearly 2.5 times the
private label share of the category.
Does ‘First Switch’ Drive Success?The first product to enter a new category or segment has
advantages, but it does not guarantee success. For exam-
ple, in Canada, the upset stomach remedy Pepcid was the
first to enter the OTC market, but it ended up in second
place after the number-one prescription brand Zantac
switched over. Consumer recognition and doctor
recommendation undoubtedly played a large part. The
private label counterpart in this category also caused a
tremendous impact as it took a large share of the market.
Con
sum
er I
nsig
ht |
Win
ter
2001
|
10
Feature
In addition to the extraordinary focus on media spend-
ing, two of these launches were characterized by multi-
ple executions for each brand, often targeted to different
demographic segments. Given the huge media budgets,
this is not surprising. These media levels resulted in
Other category switches proved disappointing. After the
switch of anti-smoking products, sales never materialized
to anticipated results. The fact that medical plans would
no longer cover the product and the introduction of
“newer” anti-smoking prescription products may have
discouraged some consumers.
Case in PointPrescription remedies are globalizing and growing.
As the world moves toward one big market, the policy
differences on prescription medications become more
apparent. Many prescription brands in the U.S. may be
OTC in Canada or Mexico. In some cases, the opposite
is true. To understand the magnitude of the consumeriza-
tion and implications of prescription to OTC switching,
ACNielsen BASES, the world leader in the simulated test
marketing field, has tested virtually every Rx-to-OTC
switch in the last 15 years.
The benefits of testing products with consumers prior
to a launch are significant. Not only are OTC usage
patterns studied, but efficacy and safety perceptions are
also analyzed. In addition, label compliance, price sensi-
tivity and cannibalization are dissected. This translates
Chart 2Advertising Spending in Year 1
into a high degree of switch success. When validating a
forecast, ACNielsen BASES re-runs the model with the
actual executed marketing plan and then compares the
results against actual sales. For switches, ACNielsen
BASES has completed 11 validations and has been within
their quoted confidence range 10 of those 11 times.
The Importance of AwarenessHow important is brand awareness for Rx-to-OTC
switching to occur? In a word: very. Advertising, con-
sumer sampling and physician marketing all play critical
roles in the successful marketing of the Rx-to-OTC
switch. ACNielsen BASES research shows that the
average switch brand spends seven times as much on
advertising as an average non-switch OTC brand. And
three of the brands examined spent at least $50 million
on media, far above the normal level for an OTC intro-
duction. These ad spending levels are phenomenal for a
new brand in year one [See Chart 2].
Source: BASES Validations
| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
11
Take Brand A, for example, which focused heavily on
professional marketing. It captured 71% of all details
directed against physicians for the category, dropped
80% of physician samples and was competitive on
journal ads. The result: Brand A was highly successful,
gaining the majority of doctor recommendations
[See Chart 4].
Chart 3Concept Purchase Intent with Doctor Recommendation
Chart 4Physician Recommendations (post switch)
enormously high awareness, with three of the brands
approaching 90%. While two of the three brands started
out with substantial awareness levels, one product built
to 90% from virtually nothing. Further increasing
awareness, one of these brands dropped more than one
sample for every household in the U.S.
The Doctor Is InPhysician endorsement is another key marketing variable
crucial to the success of a brand switch. Not only is it
important and quantifiable, but it translates to a high
degree of consumer acceptance. In three separate cases,
the consumer’s intent to purchase was considerably higher
after a doctor recommendation was given [See Chart 3].
A Powerful ForceThe ripple effect of Rx-to-OTC switching has a powerful
impact on the channel dynamics, the distribution of the
product and the total category. While one might think
that prescription switches would be most impactful in
the drug channel, ACNielsen research shows differently.
In the examples studied, prescription switches established
the largest proportion of total category sales in the
mass merchandiser channel (43% of the new segment),
followed by drug (39%) and food (33%). It is evident
that consumers take advantage of the deeper discounts
found in the mass channel.
The impact of prescription switches on product distribu-
tion is also evident. Backed by millions of dollars of con-
sumer advertising, it is not surprising that “switch
brands,” the secondary alternative to the initial launched
brand, achieve quick distribution. When comparing a
switch brand to a leading product launch in OTC,
ACNielsen found that two of four switch brands far sur-
passed a benchmark product launch distribution in the
first four weeks of the introduction. On a channel-by-
channel basis, the same is true. In drug, the blockbuster
OTC product achieved an 84% ACV distribution during
the first four-week period, while two switch brands hit
Source: BASES Tests
12
FeatureC
onsu
mer
Ins
ight
| W
inte
r 20
01|
91% and 93% during the first four weeks. The same
held true in the mass channel (86% distribution for
leading product vs. 95% and 96% for switch brands).
With OTC switches representing over 30% of the total
category, the share of base brands changes dramatically.
Switch brands have a tremendous impact on existing
brands that may compete for similar consumers or that
may be impacted by the prescription switch. In the
example below, Base Private Label becomes stronger
(156 index), while the second-leading Base Brand B was
negatively impacted [See Chart 5].
$ Share to Total CategoryIndex
Base A 20.9 15.1 72Base B 19.2 6.9 35Base C 13.5 8.5 63Private Label 10.7 16.7 156Base D 11.8 5.4 46Base E 9.6 4.4 46
Pre Introduction Post Introduction
Chart 5What Happened to Major Base Brands?
When switches occur in a category, manufacturers and
retailers of the base products need to understand their
base product consumer differentiation from the switch
products and think about how to target to the new
prescription switch consumer.
Industry ImplicationsThe growing importance of understanding the consumer-
ization of prescription brands and the implications are
far-reaching. ACNielsen and BASES research shows
general observed trends:
• Base brands do not react to higher-priced switch
products with price reductions.
• Switch brands receive very high in-store support
early on in the switch, and continue strong for the
first year.
• Private label has a higher-than-average share in the
prescription switch segment.
• Successful brands add SKUs (sizes) over time and
provide additional consumer benefits.
The trends that currently drive the consumerization of
prescription medications will continue. Consumers
will become even more involved in their medication
decisions both for prescription items as well as OTC
products. Manufacturers and retailers need to better
understand who their consumers are and what else they
are purchasing as part of their medicine cabinet.
13| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
Feature
Fear is one of the great motivators. It pushes us
to go where we have not gone before, to do
things we may not otherwise have done.
However, fear often causes the opposite reaction—
an inability to act. One of the biggest issues with
regard to category pricing is this “rule of fear.”
The underlying reason? Call it The Great Unknown.
Better to not change pricing, goes the thinking, than
to change it and negatively impact sales. And in our
high-stakes marketplace, this thinking is not totally
unfounded. However, by using a strategic framework
for item-level price management, we can reduce the
fear and drive profitability for the category.
The Key Questions Within this framework, there are four key questions
the category manager needs to answer. First, “Which
items are most important?” This can be done by
breaking the category into strategic groups of items,
based on their pricing velocity and sensitivity.
The next steps include: determining how the items
respond to changing price; what the pricing envi-
ronment is for key items; and finally, what the key
price points are.
These four questions help to define a common set of
information to drive better pricing decisions. These
questions are relevant to the key pricing “audiences”
in retailer, broker and manufacturer organizations,
and are adaptable to different pricing management
environments and applications.
John Porter
VP, KnowledgeWorks
ACNielsen
Jeff Ritchie
Director, KnowledgeWorks
ACNielsen
Four key questions1. Which items are most important?
2. How do items respond to changes in price?
3. What is the pricing environment for key items?
4. What are the key price points?
Con
sum
er I
nsig
ht |
Win
ter
2001
|
14
FeatureSeparate the CategoryTo address the first question, one needs to break the cate-
gory into strategic groups of items. These groups can be
used against any product category. Chart 1 shows that
items with high velocity and price sensitivity should be
given high pricing priority, since they will have the
greatest tactical impact. Items such as snacks, cereals
and carbonated beverages have high pricing priority and
should be considered “flagship” in your pricing scheme—
with pricing that calls attention to the items.
Likewise, those categories with more moderate velocity
and sensitivity should be priced competitively, but not as
loss leaders. Finally, items that have medium-to-low
velocity and sensitivity should use appropriate pricing
strategies.
change at all, they have to be reduced (otherwise con-
sumers will buy something else). And by reducing price,
marketers are then faced with boosting volume to cover the
difference—a slippery slope if there ever was one.
The good news, however, is that by performing category
pricing analyses, marketers can actually find the places
where increasing price is a good thing, and in some cases
can even increase volume as a result. The key is to under-
stand price elasticity.
For any given category, the following variablesmust be considered when understanding andimplementing pricing plans:
Velocity—high-velocity items move off the shelvesmore quickly. Typically, consumers are also moreaware of pricing changes for these items
Price Sensitivity—this metric refers to theresponsiveness consumers have to changes inprice for a given item
Margin—the revenue gained is different fordifferent items based on purchase price, tradepromotions, etc.
It is generally accepted that revenue for highsensitivity items is strongly influenced by price, andthat high-velocity items typically drive volume. Thesefactors, combined with margin, can help determinepricing tactics to support category strategy
Chart 1Start by Breaking the Category into Strategic Groups of Items
Sensitivity
High Response Medium Low Response
High Velocity Flagship Pricing Competitive Pricing Manage Margin(High Visibility)
Middle Tier Competitive Manage Margin Take MarginPricing
Slow Movers Build ROI
Fear RulesSince price is the driver of revenue and profit, it is no
wonder that marketers are hesitant to change a product
price once it is established—the aforementioned rule of
fear. The corollary is the impression that if prices are to
Velo
city
Elasticity—How Items Respond Elasticity is simply a measure of how items respond to
changes in price. The goal is to provide reliable reporting
of the sensitivity of an item to a change in shelf price.
In analytical terms, elasticity measures the impact of a
one-percent change in shelf price (increase or decrease) on
revenue. An elasticity of 1.0, for example, would indicate
a one-percent decrease in revenue relative to the price
change. An elasticity of 2.0 would show a two-percent
15| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
decrease in revenue for the price change, and so on.
Clearly, as the elasticity numbers grow larger, the item is
defined as being more price sensitive.
The important thing is to start by looking at facts, which
helps to focus on fast moving, price-sensitive items as well
as identify “margin improvement” items.
Benchmarking ElasticityACNielsen has been studying the relationship between
price elasticity and channel for more than a decade.
During the late 1980s, mass merchandisers had the highest
overall elasticity, and drug the lowest of all the channels.
This means that changes in price more drastically affected
volume in mass than they did in drug. Perhaps not an
earth-shattering discovery, but when combined with the
fact that mass merchandisers had the lowest overall prices
while drug had the highest, one can begin to see that high-
er pricing does not always negatively impact volume.
Our latest look at the findings considered three channels,
50 categories and roughly 35 items per category that were
sold in all three channels. What we found was that there are
distinct differences between channels [See Chart 2, page 17].
While the median elasticity was near 1, the variation
ranged significantly among mass, food and drug. Within
each channel, the price elasticity also varied widely by cate-
gory. All channels had categories that were quite elastic, as
well as relatively inelastic categories [See Chart 3, page 17].
There are also differences in elasticities within categories.
Most categories show a range of item sensitivities—most
have a mix of elastic and inelastic items. For example, in
the light duty detergent category, the elasticity ranges from
-0.7 (low sensitivity) to -1.6 (high sensitivity).
Perhaps the most enlightening insight from the research is
that consumers seem to shop “in context.” For example,
while food products are fairly inelastic when purchased in a
food channel store (changes in price caused less drastic
changes in sales), these Food products were typically 30%
to 40% more elastic when purchased in drug and mass.
The reason for this? One theory is that since shoppers visit
channels based on destination products (healthcare remedies
in drug, bread and milk in food channel, etc.) they are not
as likely to buy the impulse (i.e., “non-context” items)
unless the price is attractive. More study is definitely neces-
sary for the underlying reasons. But it is definitely impor-
tant to consider when developing channel pricing strategy.
Aside from this finding, however, the variations make it dif-
ficult to generalize rules of elasticity relative to channels or
categories – diversity in categories and channels is the rule.
And that is why shelf price management must be a catego-
ry/channel specific activity, focusing on the category’s role in
the store and the competitive environment in addition to
price sensitivity.
Continued on page 17.
A Test:
Put the following products in order of elasticity,starting with the most elastic and finishing with the most inelastic.
❑ Crest 6.4 oz Tube Toothpaste
❑ Pert Plus 13.5 oz Shampoo with Conditioner
❑ Yoplait 6 oz Strawberry/Banana Yogurt
❑ Motrin 50 count Regular Strength Gelcap
❑ General Mills 20 oz Cheerios
❑ Kibbles & Bits 20 Pound Dry Dog Food
❑ Dawn 28 oz Liquid Dishwasher DetergentAnswers on page 18.
Elasticity measures theimpact of a one-percent
change in shelf price(increase or decrease)
on revenue.
16
Con
sum
er I
nsig
ht |
Win
ter
2001
|
Feature
The Premium Foods Company was contemplating a price increase
on their olive oils. They had two products, Virgin Olive Oil and Extra
Virgin Olive Oil (the higher end of the two brands). Profitability was
critical for each brand, and the company also wanted to maintain
the premium image of the higher priced Extra Virgin oil.
Premium Foods needed to understand: a) how much of a price
increase they could profitably take; b) whether they could raise
prices on both brands to maintain a premium positioning; and c)
how their products should be priced relative to Private Label.
In addition to analyzing price points, gaps and sales levels,
ACNielsen looked at elasticity across brands for the two Premium
Foods brands and Private Label. This allowed determination of the
effect of price changes on any of the three brands.
Private Label was most often parity priced with Extra Virgin and had
a higher sales rate than Extra Virgin’s. The Premium Virgin brand
was typically priced around $2.00 less than the other two and had
the highest overall sales rate.
All three brands examined were shown to be inelastic (less price sen-
sitive). Therefore, Premium Foods could raise prices and increase
profitability without putting much volume at risk. In addition, since
both Premium Foods product prices could increase, Extra Virgin could
maintain its high-end positioning in the marketplace [See Chart 1].
The company also needed to understand the interaction between the
Premium brands and Private Label in the face of a price increase, to
show retailers that a price increase by Premium would not negatively
affect either Private Label or the category as a whole.
What the company discovered was good news for everyone.
Premium Virgin Olive Oil sales were entirely a function of that product’s
own price and did not interact with the other two brands. A price
increase by Premium’s Virgin Olive Oil would not affect the sales vol-
ume of either Extra Virgin or Private Label. In addition, Premium Virgin
was not affected by either of the other two brands changing their price.
For Premium’s Extra Virgin brand, there was a price relationship with
Private Label. Premium’s Extra Virgin Olive Oil impacted Private Label’s
volume when Premium raised its price, but Private Label did not impact
Extra Virgin when Private Label increased in price [See Chart 2]. This
supported the hypothesis that some consumers might switch to Private
Label following a price increase.
So how was this good news for Premium? Using Price Simulator,
Premium Foods simulated a 5% price increase on both their brands
and Private Label. The modeled result showed Premium increasing
profitability by 4%, with the retailer increasing by 20%. Premium
used these results to develop their annual pricing plan, and they
were able to present to retailers the feasibility of the 5% price
increase, which was then accepted and subsequently implemented
[See Chart 3].
A Case Study From Canada*
*Key information for this case study has been masked
Average Most
Price Sales Common
Range Rate Price Elasticity
Premium $9.99–
Virgin $13.99 16 $9.99 -0.66
Premium $10.99–
Extra Virgin $14.79 10 $11.99 -0.77
Private Label $5.99– 14 $11.99 -0.90
$12.79
PremiumPremium Extra PrivateBrands VirginRate Virgin Label ElasticityPremium Virgin -0.66 — — -0.66Premium —
Extra Virgin-0.77 — -0.77Private Label — -0.90 — -0.90
Chart 1: All brands are inelastic
Chart 2 Relationships Between BrandsPremium Extra Virigin affects itself and Private Label
Across=brands that affect youDown=brands you affect
% Change % Change % ChangeCurrent Proposed % Change in in Dollar Premium Retail
Brand Price Price Unit Sales Volume Profits ProfitsPremium Virgin $9.99 $10.49 -3.20% 1.60% 3.30% 29.10%Premium
ExtraVirgin $11.99 $12.59 -3.70% 1.10% 5.80% 14%Private Label $11.99 $12.59 0 5.00%19.20%Total
-2.30% 2.60 4.20 20.54%
Chart 3 A Price Increase Across the Broad Increased Profitability
| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
17
Consumers seem to shop‘in context.‘
The Pricing EnvironmentPricing is decided in a very competitive environment.
Marketers need detailed, reliable reporting of how an item
is priced, relative to the market and channel, to understand
how best to set and/or adjust price. By understanding the
pricing environment, we can provide a richer view of the
way a consumer sees pricing in a channel—whether by most
common price, lowest price, average price, highest price or
by key price points.
One current method is to look at average price for a partic-
ular retailer compared to the overall trading area. By using
a pricing environment template, one can try to summarize
pricing and positioning across channels. These price man-
agement tools provide the ability to systematically capture
and present more pricing detail.
How does this look in the real world? Usually one needs to
build pricing environment rules. These can be defined in dif-
ferent ways, according to the particular need. Sometimes,
rules are set relative to competition. Typically, pricing rules
are summarized in ways that support managers in making
tactical pricing decisions: “I will be within 5% of the lowest
price in my trading area” or “Price Zone 1 will be priced
above 75% of the other retailers in the area.” [See Chart 4].
Chart 3Category Elasticity Findings
Each channel had a wide range of elasticities, depending on the individual category• All channels had categories that were quite elastic• All channels had relatively inelastic categories
Chart 2Channel Elasticity Findings
The channels are quite different in their price sensitivities
Chart 4Building Price Environment Rules
DESCRIPTION: BRAND B QUARTER: Q1 2001
Market Average Most Common Low Price 15% 25% 35% 50%
Retailer A $9.28 $9.29 $9.19
Total Drug $9.11 $8.99 $7.99 $8.99 $8.99 $8.99 $9.29
Total Food $9.33 $9.99 $7.99 $8.69 $8.99 $9.99 $9.99
Market 50% 75% Highest
Retailer A $9.39
Total Drug $9.29 $9.39 $9.69
Total Food $9.99 $9.99 $10.49
Con
sum
er I
nsig
ht |
Win
ter
2001
|
18
Feature
Price threshold: price that is accompanied by a marked change in consumer behavior
Answer to sidebar on page 15.Product Description ElasticityKibbles & Bits 20 Pound Dry Dog Food -1.68Yoplait 6 oz Strawberry/Banana Yogurt -1.53Dawn 28 oz Liquid Dishwasher Detergent -1.33General Mills 20 oz Cheerios -0.98Pert Plus 13.5 oz Shampoo with Conditioner -0.93Crest 6.4 oz Tube Toothpaste -0.86Motrin 50 count Regular Strength Gelcap -0.48
By using good environment summaries, one can provide a
fact-based approach to setting competitive pricing metrics.
Key Price Points So now we know the item’s role and margin, the price sensi-
tivity (elasticity), and the pricing environment. Can we set any
price? Usually, we can, but a final element in developing a
pricing strategy is to determine the key price points. All items
come with price thresholds: prices that are accompanied by a
marked change in consumer behavior [See Chart 5].
It is very important to determine the thresholds for key items.
It should also be noted, however, that determining thresholds
can be a very time-intensive analysis, and should therefore be
used for key items only.
Meeting The ChallengeThere are four questions related to pricing management:
Which items are most important? What is the pricing
environment for key items? How do those items respond to
price? Are there key price points? Answering these four ques-
tions is the first step in defining a common set of informa-
tion to drive better pricing decisions. It is also a helpful tool
in driving away the fear of implementing strategic pricing at
the store shelf.
Chart 5Price Threshold Checks For Key Items
45
90
40
35
30
25
20
15
10
5
0
$5
.90
to
$5
.99
$6
.00
to
$6
.09
$6
.20
to
$6
.29
$6
.40
to
$6
.49
$6
.10
to
$6
.19
$6
.30
to
$6
.39
$6
.50
to
$6
.59
$6
.60
to
$6
.69
$6
.80
to
$6
.89
$6
.70
to
$6
.79
$6
.90
to
$6
.99
$7
.00
to
$7
.09
$7
.20
to
$7
.29
$7
.40
to
$7
.49
$7
.10
to
$7
.19
$7
.30
to
$7
.39
$7
.50
to
$7
.59
$7
.60
to
$7
.69
$7
.70
to
$7
.79
$7
.80
to
$7
.89
$7
.90
to
$7
.99
$8
.00
to
$8
.09
$8
.10
to
$8
.19
$8
.20
to
$8
.29
$8
.30
to
$8
.39
$8
.40
to
$8
.49
$8
.50
to
$8
.59
$8
.60
to
$8
.69
$8
.70
to
$8
.79
$8
.80
to
$8
.89
19| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
Feature
Jane Perrin
Managing Director
ACNielsen Global Services
Clare Nishikawa
Manager, Global Reports and Communication
ACNielsen Global Services
What does it mean to be global?
Despite a proliferation of
brands in the marketplace
and a focus by major manufacturers on
expanding into new territories, there are
relatively few global megabrands in the
consumer goods world today. ACNielsen’s
Global Services group recently completed
a study of top global CPG brands. Rather
than providing a simple tally of shipment
sales from a company’s annual report,
ACNielsen has measured actual retail
sales from 30 countries that account for
90% of global GDP. The following is a
rationale behind the choosing of the
brands and a brief summary of the study.
Note: Due to the fact that no one measure can include all channels of consumer purchasing, this study is heavily weighted towards purchases from retail stores. The data in this study was sourced fromlocal ACNielsen information. Products most often purchased within a retail store benefit from ACNielsen’s retail coverage. Purchases from kiosks, bars, restaurants and vending machines were not for themost part included. Although the list of brands may not be all-inclusive due to coverage limitations, it does provide a significant look into the globalization of our consumer brands.
20
Con
sum
er I
nsig
ht |
Win
ter
2001
|
FeatureThere were three main criteria that a brand had to meet
to be included in the study. First, the cumulative sales for
the 12 months ending with the first quarter of 2001 had
to be equal to or exceed US$1 billion. Second, the brand
had to have a measurable presence in each of the four
major geographic regions—Latin America; Asia Pacific;
North America; and Europe, Middle East and Africa.
Finally, sales outside of the home market had to repre-
sent at least 5% of the global sales value.
To define and determine a “brand,” we looked for con-
sistency in terms of product packaging, marketing and
consumer views of the brand. In addition, we segmented
brands within their specific category. For example,
Pampers wipes were not combined with Pampers dia-
pers. Brands also had to use a consistent name world-
wide. For example, Lays and Walkers (Europe) were not
combined as a single chips & snacks brand, nor were
Always and Whisper (Asia) combined as a single
sanitary protection brand.
We looked at well over 200 brands in this study and
although more than half had a global presence, they did
not have more than $1 billion in sales. Of the total, only
43 actually met the criteria of having a global presence
in each region and having over $1 billion in sales. The
43 brands on the list represent 23 global manufacturers
and more than $125 billion in sales.
Among the 43 brands, most had the largest concentration
of sales in their region of origin. Additionally, most of the
brands had a high concentration of sales in either North
America or Europe (62% on average). For three brands
(Gillette, Pedigree and Always), both North America and
Europe had equal predominance [See Chart 1].
Beverages Are Number OneNot surprising to any global traveler, the category with
the most billion-dollar global brands was the beverage
category. Nearly one-third of the brands included in the
final list (13 of the 43) were a beverage, including car-
bonated beverages, juice, sports drinks, coffee and beer.
Although local taste preferences may be accommodated
# of countries Brand Segment included, 30 maximum
Total Coke Carbonated Beverages 30Coke (Regular)*Diet Coke/Coke Light*
Marlboro Tabacco 25Marlboro (Regular)*
Marlboro Lights*Total Pepsi Carbonated Beverages 30
Pepsi (Regular)*Diet Pepsi/Pepsi Light*
Budweiser Beer 25Campbell’s Soup 21Kellogg’s Cereal 27Pampers Diapers 27Benson & Hedges Tabacco 21Camel Tabacco 24Danone Yogurt 25Fanta Carbonated Beverages 29Friskies Pet Food 24Gillette Blades & Razors 29Huggies Diapers 25Nescafe Coffee 29Sprite Carbonated Beverages 30Tide Laundry Detergent 11Tropicana Still Beverages 17Wrigley’s Chewing Gum 27Colgate Toothpaste 29Duracell Batteries 28Heineken Beer 26Kodak Consumer Films 13L&M Tobacco 18Lay’s Chips & Snacks 22Pedigree Pet Food 25Always Sanitary Protection 22Doritos Chips & Snacks 20Energizer Batteries 28Gatorade Sports Beverages 22Guinness Beer 23Kinder Chocolate 28Kleenex Facial Tissue 26L’Oreal Colorants 27Maxwell House Coffee 19Minute Maid Still Beverages 16Nivea Moisturizers/Cleansers 29Pantene Shampoo/Conditioners 30Philadelphia Cheese 25Pringles Chips & Snacks 30Seven-Up/7-Up ) Carbonated Beverages 30Tylenol OTC Pain Remedies 9Whiskas * Cat Food 24
*Denote sub-brands which independently meet the global billion dollar mark but are included in the total for the brand
Chart 1Billion Dollar Global Brands
21| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
by different product formulations distributed under the
same brand name, essentially consumers around the
world are all drinking variations of these same brands.
The total Coke brand was number one among beverages
at well over $15 billion in sales, with its two sub-brands,
Coke and Diet Coke, having more than one billion dol-
lars in sales in their own right. Pepsi, with its associated
sub-brands, Pepsi and Diet Pepsi (including Pepsi Light,
Pepsi Max and Pepsi One) ranked as the number-two
beverage brand.
Snack, Pet and Tobacco Also Strong Although no other single food group had as significant a
number of brands included as the beverage category,
there were three snack foods that stood out with over
one billion dollars in global sales (Pringles, Lay’s and
Doritos). Soup, cereal, yogurt, cheese, chewing gum, and
chocolate all had one brand each on the list. Pet foods
were represented by a dog-food brand (Pedigree), a cat-
food brand (Whiskas) and one that caters to both cats
and dogs (Friskies).
Four tobacco brands had a significant global presence
and met the billion-dollar criteria: Marlboro, Benson &
Hedges, Camel and L&M. Like the beverage category,
local formulations may differ, but consumers in every
region are smoking these common brands.
The Remaining Mix Of the remaining fourteen brands, no one category
emerged as dominant, with 12 categories each having
representation: battery, diaper, shampoo & conditioners,
colorants, moisturizers & cleansers, toothpaste, facial
tissues, OTC pain remedies, film, blades & razors, and
sanitary protection. Interestingly enough, there was
only one household product on the list: Tide Laundry
Detergent. Although manufacturers market similar
household and cleaning products around the world,
they are often marketed under different brand names.
The Mega-Manufacturers Of the 23 manufacturers that are responsible for market-
ing these billion-dollar global brands, eight had more than
one brand on the list. PepsiCo had the most brands with
six (when including 7-Up, which is distributed by Cadbury
Schweppes in the U.S.). Procter & Gamble and Philip
Morris (Kraft included) each had five, with the Coca-Cola
Company having four brands. Kimberly-Clark, Gillette,
Mars and Nestlé each had two brands included.
In the tobacco category, although Marlboro and L&M
are definitely Philip Morris brands, the other two brands
both have some type of multi-company relationship.
British American Tobacco, Philip Morris and Gallaher,
for example, all have an interest in Benson & Hedges,
22
Con
sum
er I
nsig
ht |
Win
ter
2001
|
Feature• Eight of these brands have at least 70% of their sales
within the region: Benson & Hedges, Guinness,
Heineken, Kinder, L&M, Nivea, Whiskas and Camel.
• Guinness Beer (country of origin: Ireland) and Kinder
Chocolate (country of origin: Italy), each had over
90% of their sales within Europe.
• On the opposite end of the spectrum, Tylenol is in only
a handful of countries in Europe and plays a relatively
minor role in the region.
Asia Pacific (Five countries)
• Of the 43 brands that made the list, none originated in
this region.
• As mentioned above, Nescafé had a strong presence in
Asia Pacific as one the top five brands in the region.
Over thirty percent of its sales are in this region.
• P&G’s Always product plays a fairly insignificant role
in Asia Pacific as another similar P&G product is mar-
keted under the brand name Whisper. L&M also has a
fairly small presence in this region.
• In addition, as with Europe, Tylenol has a fairly
insignificant presence in Asia Pacific.
Latin America (Three countries)
• Gillette’s Razors and Blades brand has a strong presence
in Latin America, and in fact, is one of the top five
global brands in the region.
• Carbonated beverages rated high in this region. This is
not surprising, since Mexico has one of the highest per
capita consumption of carbonated beverages around
the world.
• One of the most significant findings regarding Latin
America is that a number of global brands (Maxwell
House, Minute Maid and Tide) although present, were
significantly under-developed.
• Although globally Benson & Hedges is larger than
L&M tobacco products, in Latin America, L&M
has a larger presence.
and both RJReynolds and Japan Tobacco distribute
Camel (depending on the country).
As mentioned earlier, the 43 brands reported in the
study accounted for over $125 billion in sales. Nearly
three-quarters of these sales were attributable to the
eight manufacturers with multiple brands on the list.
Global Growth Echoes Consumer Trends The growth across the 43 brands over the last two years
shows little consistency. However, two trends could be
identified: Perceived healthy products, such as juice, sports
drinks and yogurt, have experienced double digit growth
over the last two years; and products with a convenience
image, such as snack food entries Lay’s and Doritos, as
well as Wrigley’s gum, also showed significant growth.
Sales in Regions Closely Follow Global FindingsWithin each of the four regions (North America; Latin
America; Asia Pacific; and Europe, Middle East &
Africa), the regional sales of the global brands closely
follow the global findings. For example, in each of the
four regions, Coke and Marlboro were consistently the
top two brands of the 43 brands studied.
North America & Europe Are the Largest MarketsOne key finding mentioned in the Global Summary is
that all of the brands included in the global list had their
largest markets in North America or Europe, Middle East
& Africa. Three of the 43 brands were equally strong in
the two regions (Gillette, Pedigree, and Always). This is
not surprising considering that based on the countries
included in the report, North America accounts for 32%
of the world’s GDP and Europe 33%. Asia and Latin
America represent 20% and 5%, respectively.
Regional DifferencesAlthough the global findings are fairly consistent across
the regions, there are a few regional variations:
Europe, Middle East & Africa (Twenty countries)
• Of the brands on the list, Europe, Middle East and
Africa is the dominant region for 16 of the global brands.
23| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
The study includes 30 of the world’s top markets divided into four geographical
regions. These markets account forapproximately 90% of the world’s
consumer goods ACV:Europe, Middle East and Africa Asia PacificGermany JapanUnited Kingdom ChinaFrance Korea, Rep. (South Korea)Italy AustraliaSpain Hong Kong, ChinaRussian Federation Netherlands Latin AmericaSwitzerland BrazilBelgium MexicoSweden ArgentinaAustriaTurkey North AmericaDenmark United StatesPoland CanadaNorwaySaudi Arabia South AfricaGreecePortugalIreland
• Three brands had over 90% of their sales in North
America: Campbell’s Soup, Tide Laundry Detergent,
and Tylenol Pain Remedies.
• Within categories, there are some strong regional pref-
erences. For example, Maxwell House ranks higher
than Nescafé in North America. In Europe, Asia Pacific
and Latin America, the picture is reversed.
• As detailed in the report, an element of the criteria to
be included in the global report was that in addition to
having a presence in each region, more than 5% of a
brand’s value sales had to be outside of the home mar-
ket. If this 5% criteria had not been included, several
other strong North American brands would have made
the list (e.g., Enfamil Infant Formula and Mountain
Dew Carbonated Beverage).
• Kinder Chocolate and L&M are strongly European,
and although they have a presence in North America,
they do not play any major role in the market.
• Fanta Carbonated Beverage is somewhat unique.
Although in three of the four regions the carbonated
beverage has a strong presence (within the top five
global brands), the brand does not have a significant
presence in North America.
A Sign of Things to ComeOverall, the beverage companies appear to be the farthest
ahead on the globalization curve, both in the number of
global products and in the magnitude of sales. Tobacco
companies also have a significant number of global
brands on the list (four out of 43). Although growth
across the 43 brands is on average less than 10%, eight
of the 43 brands have experienced double-digit growth
in the most recent year.
Although there is a proliferation of brands on the market,
this study illustrates that there are a relatively few brands
that one can truly call global. Over the next few years,
we expect the picture of global brands to change signifi-
cantly. The number of brands considered truly “global”
should increase as businesses work to develop and grow
new markets.
North America (Two countries)
• North America is the dominant region for 24 of the
global brands on the list.
• Eleven of these brands have at least 70% of their sales
within the region: Budweiser, Campbell’s, Gatorade,
Kodak, Kleenex, Lay’s, Maxwell House, Minute Maid,
Tide, Tropicana, Tylenol.The complete text of Reaching the Billion Dollar Mark—A Review of Today’s GlobalBrands is available online at http://acnielsen.com/billion or by contacting Matt Bell at847-605-5686.
Con
sum
er I
nsig
ht |
Win
ter
2001
|
24
Feature
25| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
The Coca-Cola Company, Publix Super Markets and
Acosta Sales and Marketing Company are winners of
the third annual Category Master of the Year awards,
co-sponsored, with ACNielsen, by Brand Marketing
magazine and its sister publication, Supermarket News.
Presented at ACNielsen’s Category Masters conference,
held in August in Boca Raton, Florida, the awards honor
one manufacturer, one retailer and one sales agency (the
last being a new category this year) in the consumer
packaged goods industry that have achieved excellence
in the field of category management.
Winners were selected by polling a portion of the
readership of Brand Marketing and Supermarket News.
Retailers were asked to choose the manufacturer winner
and manufacturers the retailer. Both manufacturers and
retailers selected the sales agency. The common element
to all the winners was a total management commitment
to category management that included reorganizations
of departments to address category management issues.
Here are the profiles of this year’s winners and some
examples of their category management expertise.
Coke: An Open EarAlthough category management as a business term was
coined in the early 1990s, Coca-Cola North America has
been aiding retailers in the quest to expand the beverage
category and increase sales for over a century. Coca-
Cola sees category management as a retailer’s business
process, meaning it listens to what retailers want to
accomplish in a category and helps them build their
businesses accordingly, said Dave Campbell, director
of category-management services at Coca-Cola North
America, who accepted the award at the event.
“We see category management as a means to increasing
the size of the category, while leading sales growth,”
Campbell said.
To facilitate category growth among all its customers,
Coke assembled a two-part team consisting of headquar-
ters staff and field managers. At headquarters, Campbell
leads teams specializing in technology and applications
support, consumer insights, retail plan development and
training. Including field-based managers, more than 600
associates are involved in the category-management team.
The system has been successful for Coke. For example,
at one retailer, the number of stock-keeping units was
reduced 30%, while sales stayed the same in the category.
But it’s not just about sales and efficiencies, Campbell
added. It’s about excitement. “Consumers’ tastes are con-
stantly changing,” he said. “Having the ability to create
excitement in the category is a lot of why we’re in this.”
Publix: The Team ApproachPublix Super Markets, Lakeland, Florida, has been utiliz-
ing category-management initiatives since 1991, when the
company restructured its buying department. Since then,
Publix has evolved from pilot efforts in selected categories
to the creation of a purchasing department and a system
consisting of 12 category managers and their category
teams. These teams report to four business development
directors, who handle nearly all of the grocery purchasing
for the 670-store chain, according to Dave Bornmann,
vice president of grocery purchasing at Publix.
Publix attributes its category-management success to its
team approach. “Category managers are continually
asked to improve our sales and shares and profits, and
they’re also responsible for understanding the changing
trends and wants of our customers. Without that, it
would just be traditional buying,” Bornmann said.
When asked why he thinks manufacturers view Publix’s
category-management initiative so favorably, Bornmann
points to the retailer’s strong working relationship with
its suppliers. “Publix’s willingness to share more openly
its data and future plans, where it is mutually beneficial
for Publix and our suppliers to reduce waste, has gotten
our suppliers’ attention,” Bornmann said.
Publix works best with suppliers who view a category as
a whole. Publix’s best planning partners are suppliers
who help drive total category sales. Such suppliers know
that, in turn, their sales will increase, said Bornmann.
Publix also looks for suppliers with new merchandising
ideas and knowledge of trends and product attributes.
Con
sum
er I
nsig
ht |
Win
ter
2001
|
26
Feature
AcostaFrom the early days of category management, Acosta
Sales and Marketing has been at the forefront, helping
retailers and manufacturers increase sales and cut costs.
The company provides category management expertise to
major retailers like Kroger, Albertson’s and Safeway,
while also working closely with major brands, including
Clorox and Dannon.
Paul Price, vice president of marketing at Acosta, heads
up an extensive category-management team that includes
400 associates across the country. Each division is geo-
graphically focused on a major retailer to ensure that
customer demands are met.
Acosta’s category management and merchandising skills
were demonstrated with their recent introduction of the
new line of Disney juice and drink items. Their first step
was to execute a complete analysis of the aseptic and
multi-serve juice and drink categories. For each retailer,
Acosta business managers reviewed shares and trends by
manufacturer, brand and package within the two cate-
gories. They also reviewed pre-schematic share of shelf
and space-to-sales for all items.
The next step was to execute an efficient product assort-
ment analysis to help retailers optimize their product lines
for the aseptic and multi-serve juice and drink categories
and to justify the new Disney items. With the results of
the analysis, Acosta made objective recommendations on
items to be discontinued, items that should be retained
and items to be added. The recommendation to add items
often included items that Acosta was not representing.
Sales meetings were set up with all major accounts and
the results of the category analyses were presented along
with a strong sales pitch for the new Disney items. The
Acosta business managers recommended the placement of
the Disney line in a “Disney Zone” between the aseptic
and multi-serve categories. The sales presentations lever-
aged not just the strength of the Disney juice and drink
items and the strong merchandising program for the line,
but also the strength of the entire Disney franchise.
Apart from its vast experience with category manage-
ment, Price noted that what sets Acosta apart from its
competition is the fact that it continues to invest in its
category-management resources. “We have constantly
invested in the best people and systems, and in training
to get the job done,” he said.
Acosta utilizes all existing category management soft-
ware, so that it is compatible with any retailer’s system.
“In addition, we take such a broad focus on so many cat-
egories, that we provide more coverage than anyone else
in the business. One of our best assets is that we place
precious knowledge at the business manager’s fingertips.
It is not just data—it’s knowledge,” Price added.
| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
27
Chart 1All Departments, All Outlets Combined
Percentage Growth Rate vs. Same Period Year Ago
Source: ACNielsen Strategic Planner
Chart 3HBA Department
Dollar Volume Percentage Growth Rate vs. Same Period Year Ago
Source: ACNielsen Strategic Planner
Chart 4All Departments, All Outlets
Combined Percentage Growth Rate vs. Same Period Year Ago
Source: ACNielsen Strategic Planner
Chart 2Impact of 9/11
Dollar Volume Percentage Growth Rate vs. Same Period Year Ago
Source: ACNielsen Strategic Planner
film and camera companies are hurt when people vaca-
tion less—in most other categories purchasing levels
seem to be getting back to pre-attack levels. Question
marks still remain, however, about both the war on
terrorism and the economy.
Consumers are also eating out less often, a trend that
could benefit food retailers. However, some retailers
are noticing consumers “trading down”—switching
from lunchmeats to peanut butter and jelly, for exam-
ple, as they tighten their belts. This would be a good
time to focus on helping consumers find easy and
affordable meal solutions. But it is also a crucial time
to use the vast amount of consumer insights to build
loyalty among your most valuable shoppers.
Bottomline, it’s all about the consumer. To that end,
I am excited to announce that we have just completed
some groundbreaking work that aligns with the
University of Michigan Consumer Sentiment Index in
linking total consumer purchasing behavior with those
all-important consumer attitudes. Shortly, we will be
offering a new service that will track key attitudinal
and economic driving forces effecting changes in the
American consumer’s purchasing habits.
Trying Times Present CPG Industry with Challenges & OpportunitiesContinued from page 3
Con
sum
er I
nsig
ht |
Win
ter
2001
|
In these times, anything with the prefix “bio” may
cause great uncertainty, and even fear. Biowarfare.
Bioterrorism. Biotechnology? What is it about
biotechnology that raises concern among consumers, and
what exactly is it?
The FMI defines biotechnology as “the use of genetic
science to create new products from plants or animals.”
Now, everyone knows that it is not nice to fool with
Mother Nature, and classic fables from Frankenstein to
Trend Watch
28
BiotechnologyJurassic Park bear this message out. But what many
consumers probably don’t realize is that since ancient
times, people have been combining different organisms to
develop hybrids that serve human needs more beneficially.
The difference is that today, much of this is being done on
the molecular level.
It would probably be surprising to many consumers how
much biotechnology is already a part of our everyday
lives. Currently, biotech is used in the area of agriculture
29| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
to reduce reliance on pesticides and produce higher vol-
umes of food in less space. Many vegetables and fruits,
including corn, soybeans and tomatoes, are being devel-
oped to contain lower fat levels while tasting better. The
GMA estimates that as much as 70% of all processed
foods may contain biotech corn or soy.
In the future, biotech foods could offer enhanced nutri-
tion, higher vitamin levels, reduced fat and increased fiber.
According to the Biotechnology Industry Organization
(BIO), biotech even makes possible something called the
“edible vaccine,” which are enhanced fruits and vegeta-
bles containing vaccines against deadly diseases such as
hepatitis, cholera and malaria. Fruits and vegetables are
also being modified to offer higher levels of anti-oxidant
vitamins that help ward off cancer and heart disease, and
Vitamin A to prevent blindness.
While not a new concept, biotechnology has been a focus
point in the consumer news media, and the focus is typi-
cally on the sensational. After all, the Starlink incident—
the modified corn that was FDA-approved for animal
consumption but mistakenly found its way into human
food products—was some consumers’ first introduction
to biotech. More recently, gourmet chain Trader Joe’s
announced it would be eliminating all genetically engi-
neered foods from its private-label collection as a result
of consumer pressure.
Even with the hype, however, consumer awareness about
biotechnology and genetically modified foods is relatively
low. According to the International Food Information
Council (IFIC), which recently conducted their fifth annual
food biotechnology survey of American consumers, only
36% of consumers are aware of the presence of biotech food
in grocery stores, a decrease from last year’s IFIC survey.
What do consumers worry about in their foods? Not
surprisingly, top concerns included things like fats,
cholesterol, sugar and carbohydrates. Even when specifi-
cally asked about their concerns of food safety, consumers
named packaging, food handling and disease/contamina-
tion before mentioning genetically engineered food (which
only garnered a 2% response). A New York Times article
that referenced the Trader Joe’s incident also interviewed
specialty grocer Stew Leonard, who stated that although his
stores carry foods that are certified organic (currently the
only certification that ensures that food isn't genetically
altered), they have sold poorly, because the organic crops
lacked visual appeal and because customers expressed
concern about a link between E. coli bacteria and
organic produce.
This enormous information gap among most consumers is
an opportunity for both CPG manufacturers and retailers
to educate the consumer in advance of negative or sensa-
tionalistic media reports. Providing consumers with accu-
rate information about biotech food can create loyalty and
trust, key to any long-term relationship. If the benefits and
perceived issues are communicated honestly to consumers,
they may see the advantages of biotech foods greatly
outweighing any potential downsides.
And there exists the potential to lead with positive news.
For example, when asked in the IFIC survey how likely they
would be to buy produce that was genetically modified to
protect from insect damage (requiring fewer pesticides),
90% of consumers indicated “totally” or “very likely.”
Over the next few years, biotech foods will most likely
become a larger consumer issue. The current lack of infor-
mation has given consumers a one-sided (and primarily
negative) message. This presents a larger potential oppor-
tunity for retailers and manufacturers to become a trusted
advisor to their constituents, since an informed consumer
will be more confident in making sound decisions in
choosing what to buy and eat.
Con
sum
er I
nsig
ht |
Win
ter
2001
|
30
Understand Combined U.S. and CanadaConsumer Behavior
The ACNielsen Homescan® North America service providesthree detailed summary reports for executives to makestrategic decisions based on consumer purchases in the U.S.and Canada. Through the Market Summary Reports, youcan develop more effective marketing, promotion andmerchandising strategies by leveraging powerful consumerinsights for the U.S., Canada and a combined NorthAmerican region. Also, Demographic Profiles help you tounderstand what type of household is currently shoppingyour category and brands as well as the various retailers.The Trial & Repeat Evaluations can assess introductoryperformance of your latest product launch or line extensionby measuring initial product attraction (trial) and ongoingproduct acceptance or retention (repeat). Promotionalimpact (measured via deal purchasing) on trial and repeatpurchase occasions is included to evaluate the success ofintroductory marketing efforts.
ACNielsen Homescan North America captures all-outletpurchase information from over 67,000 demographicallybalanced and statistically reliable U.S. and Canadianhouseholds. Panelists use patented hand-held scanners to record every UPC-coded item purchased. The NorthAmerican Homescan service helps you make soundstrategic decisions based on a complete understanding ofhow consumers shop your categories and how consumersrespond to brands differently.
Powerful New Insights into the Wal-Mart Consumer
ACNielsen’s Homescan Panel is the Gold Standard forunderstanding why consumers buy. Now, ACNielsenHomescan also provides you insights into the Wal-Martconsumer. Six new Homescan consumer solutions providepowerful insights into the Wal-Mart consumer:
Wal-Mart Private Label Pricing Analysis defines pricegaps and illustrates consumer purchasing sensitivity tothese differences.
Wal-Mart Private Label Brand Impact Analysis allowsmanufacturers and retailers to better understand theimpact of Wal-Mart private label on consumer brand andretailer loyalty.
Wal-Mart Custom Category Cross Outlet✽ Facts Reportdelivers new insights into outlet loyalty among Wal-Martcore and occasional shoppers.
Wal-Mart Supercenter Source of Business Analysis providesan assessment of volume gains from other retail outlets and retailers.
Wal-Mart Key Item Report identifies key items purchasedin Wal-Mart, providing both manufacturers and retailerswith a unique opportunity to manage assortment moreeffectively to better serve Wal-Mart consumers.
Wal-Mart Demo-Fit Analysis correlates key consumer seg-ments in Wal-Mart to their product-purchasing behavior.
Mirroring the landscape of the entire U.S. population, theACNielsen Homescan panel is the foundation for insightsthat are unmatched in the industry. Notable facts include:
• Homescan panelists have shopped in more than 90%
of all Wal-Mart stores over the past year.
• ACNielsen can report at both Division One and
Supercenter granularity because of the high number of
static panelists who shop in Wal-Mart.
• ACNielsen has very strong C and D County coverage,
providing an advantage in tracking Wal-Mart sales
given the chain’s rural concentration.
• Homescan is the only source for price paid and dollar
volume in Wal-Mart.
31| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
Understand Hispanic ConsumerShopping Habits
The ACNielsen Homescan Hispanic Consumer✽ Facts—LosAngeles Report captures the shopping habits of Hispanicconsumers, both acculturated and non-acculturated, from all retail outlets. Category and product group level information within almost 900 categories and morethan 110 product groups reveals a wealth of consumerinsight into the buying behavior of Hispanic households.Hispanic Consumer*Facts compares the purchase behavior of Hispanics across all language segmentsincluding Spanish-only/preferred, bilingual and English-only/preferred.
The Mid-year 2001 release is now available and includesthe following:
• Los Angeles market
• All categories
• Food only
• Non-food only
• Drug only
• Individual categories
• Custom category definitions available
• Easy-to-use and improved CD-ROM application
Call Sharon Abish at ACNielsen at 516-682-6011 formore information.
Understand How Consumers Respond to Price and Promotions
ACNielsen’s Homescan Promo Focus Segmentationprovides essential information about consumer’s attitudesand perceptions toward price and promotion. PromoFocus segments enable retailers to increase the effective-ness of their marketing efforts by acquiring an in-depthunderstanding of how consumers respond to price andpromotion activity. For a manufacturer, understandinghow consumer attitudes towards price and promotiondiffer by banner helps maximize the efficiency of trade spending.
The Promo Focus household segmentation includes sixdistinct segments:
• Promotional Oblivious
• Store Loyal/Brand Disloyal
• Promotional Junkies
• Multi-Store Shoppers
• Branded Bargain Hunters
• Opportunistic Price Savers
Promo Focus tells which banner’s shoppers are likely tohold certain views towards price and promotion. Forexample, which banner’s shoppers…
• always look for coupons or other promotions
• will readily shop at different stores to get a deal
• are intrigued by offers of a free gift and will purchase
a product to get one
• are brand loyal and very store loyal
• are not interested in store loyalty cards and programs
• are not enticed to switch from their favorite brand
because of promotional offers
For more information, please contact Simon Small [email protected].
Available in Canada only Available in USA only
32
Con
sum
er I
nsig
ht |
Win
ter
2001
|
Maximize Your Shelf Space
In today’s competitive market, retailers and manufacturersspend valuable time analyzing the outcome of categorychanges or shelf resets that best maximize available space.With ACNielsen’s Spaceman, the space managementprocess is streamlined and validated, giving way to increased category management and competitive advantages.
Spaceman® Suite v6.0 includes more than 172 enhance-ments, including improvements in Spaceman’s outputcapabilities, such as a completely new Page Setup dialog boxthat combines all layout capabilities in a single location.
Spaceman Suite v6.0 gives you a host of new features,including:
• Shelves can have a positive slope and/or can be rotated
at any angle between 0 and 359 degrees.
• Fixture assemblies can now be stored in and retrieved
from the libraries for even more efficient replication of
advanced merchandising situations.
• An easy-to-use Find Product/Fixture capability to locate
a product or a fixture in any 2D planogram view and
the Product List.
• The Renumber Fixture ID feature now supports flexible
combinations of segment number, fixture number (total
or by segment), user-selected separator, prefix and
suffix to create unique Fixture IDs for all fixtures.
• The option to export only selected fields.
• You can import data for Fixtures and Positions.
• Direct import of ACNielsen data from ACNielsen
Workstation Information✽ Server™ 2.x and
Workstation Plus 4.1 and later.
Aggregate Financial Performance for the Entire Store
Spaceman Store Designer lets you accurately capture andaggregate financial performance by store, department, category and more. Spaceman Store Designer links the traditional merchandising function with those of store planning, operations and buying to properly evaluate Category Management performance.
Using Spaceman Store Designer, information is nowseamlessly passed between applications and stored in onecommon database. Proven store footprints are developedto maximize investments and space management. AndSpaceman Store Designer is the only store-planning toolthat utilizes an AutoCAD file, which returns informationback to a merchandising environment.
33| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
Maximize Category and PricingManagement
Endorsed by the Professional Pricing Society, Priceman™
3.3 strengthens the industry’s leading strategic pricingtool with new features and functions, including:
• Increased performance
• Ease of use
• Rules integration
• Processing large data pulls
• Additional enhancement
• Defaults on standard fields
Also available, Pricing✽ Insights delivers information onelasticity, promotion and average price. Pricing✽ Insightscombined with Priceman offers compelling insights tomaximize category and pricing management.
Call your local ACNielsen Merchandising ServicesRepresentative for a product demonstration today.
Determine your Optimal Pricing Strategy
ACNielsen’s INSIGHT Pricing Solutions can help youdetermine the optimal pricing strategy needed to achieveyour brand marketing goals and identify the tacticalactivities most critical to successful implementation. By determining your brand’s elasticity, INSIGHT PricingSolutions assesses the volume risk associated with aprice change.
INSIGHT Pricing Solutions help you to:
• Determine if your pricing strategy supports your
brand goals.
• Evaluate the sales and profit impact of price changes.
• Identify critical price points or price gaps that create
tactical risks or opportunities.
• Analyze sensitivity to competitive price changes.
• Pinpoint which regions are more price sensitive than
others.
For more information, please contact Mike Ljubicic [email protected].
Available in Canada Available in USA
Con
sum
er I
nsig
ht |
Win
ter
2001
|
34
Additional Retailers Sign On for the New, Industry-Leading Category Business Planner
The list of retailers continues to grow for CategoryBusiness Planner, the revolutionary, web-based businesssolution for collaborative category management. Retailerssuch as SUPERVALU, Albertson’s, Bruno’s, Meijer, HEButt, Walgreen’s, Wakefern, Eckerd, CVS and Hannafordhave chosen Category Business Planner as their preferredmethod for performing category reviews. The “one-num-ber” method for delivering category information supportscollaboration among retailers and manufacturers,improves efficiency and enables both client groups tofocus on growth initiatives.
Category Business Planner provides the common groundfor a true meeting of the minds between retailers andmanufacturers. How? By delivering category informationin the retailer’s customized view. Powerful web-enabledtools let your drill down and do in minutes what oncetook weeks. Imagine, the hours you once spent on datacompilation and analysis can now be spent workingtogether to create thoughtful, effective category plans. Your productivity will be improved and your business partnerships strengthened. Finally, you canrealize the full potential of category management.
Category Business Planner presents insights in a mannerthat is intuitive for you to understand, quick to learn, fast
to use and comprehensive in its abilityto create actionable strategies and
tactics. Accessed through theACNielsen Answers™ web por-tal, Category Business Planneruses patented modeling tech-
nology, delivering alerts andheadlines for drilling down into
the data to understand what is goingon with a given category and why.
Visit http://acnielsen.com/cbp for a complete overview.
Convenience Store Measurement at the Local Level
ACNielsen Convenience Track™ measures retail salesperformance and conditions in convenience stores andgives you two levels of measurement (market-level andaccount-level), which combine for incredibly powerfulinformation.
Convenience Track is the only source for:
• NACS Level II Category Management market
level data
• Fastest growing list of retail account reports
• Year-over-year comparison for Total U.S., local mar-
kets, cross-market analysis, product-level analysis—
Celebrating three years of on-going service
• Multi-channel/cross-channel analysis
• Extensive market list that aligned with ACNielsen
Scantrack® definitions
Convenience Track Service—Total U.S. and 30 MarketsMarket representation is paramount to your informationneeds. With scanning penetration at less than 35%, a hybrid service of scan and audit is necessary to continueto measure all convenience store sales. ACNielsencontinues to provide clients with a service that focuses on the representation of the total convenience storeenvironment and offers more than just a scanning view.
35
| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
Convenience Track Service—Account Level ServicesACNielsen Convenience Track retailer account-level datais available in all categories. The service offers over fifty-five retailer-specific data to lead to a better understandingof any category’s sales, distribution and merchandisingimpact for both the retailer and their respective market.Without local market data, retailers and manufacturerscannot perform the NACS Level II category managementprocess. ACNielsen is the only data provider in the indus-try with this unique capability. Full Level I fact sets areavailable, and with weekly information.
Market-level data allows a retailer and manufacturer tobenchmark key elements such as sales, pricing, and assort-ment to a local convenience market. This helps identifytop-selling items carried in markets but not carried by theretailers. With Convenience Track’s extensive list of mar-ket-level data, manufacturers can measure their perfor-mance, search for category opportunities, and help theretailers uncover new opportunities for the entire categoryin selected markets, cross outlet.
Available in Canada Available in USA
New Convenience Track Categories for 2002• Cookies
• Crackers
• Salty Snacks
• Nuts
Current categories include:• Beverage
• Beer
• Malternative Beverage
• Other Tobacco
• Bulk Ice Cream
• Frozen Novelties
• Energy Bars
• Meat Snacks
• Candy and Gum
New Convenience Track Account Level Services in 2002• BP/Amoco
• Crown Petroleum
• Kum N Go
Con
sum
er I
nsig
ht |
Win
ter
2001
|
36
Maximize the Power and Potential of Brands
The Power of brands is immense—strong brands lead tocustomer loyalty and company profitability. ACNielsen’sWinning B®ands™ helps you achieve sustainable compet-itive advantage with your brands. Winning B®ands tracksthe underlying strength of the relationship between thecustomer and the brand, and creates effective strategies toenhance that relationship. And Winning B®ands providesmonitoring to protect and improve your brand’s health.
Using focus groups and quantitative interviews, categoryusers are interviewed to gain their perspective on the brandsin the category. Winning B®ands uses a flexible techniquethat allows the collection of various measures, dependingon individual client and category needs. Topics can include:
• Category usage and attitudes
• Brand relationship, awareness, consideration
and preference
• Brand associations
• Willingness to pay a premium price
• Advertising awareness and diagnostics
• Other marketing program awareness and diagnostics
• Corporate image
And Winning B®ands can be part of an on-going track-ing program. Interviews are repeated at regular quarterly,semi-annual or annual intervals to monitor any changesin brand equity over time.
Winning B®ands helps you to:
• Track your brand versus the competition in relation to
consumer measures such as brand awareness, usage,
consideration and image and monitor changes in brand
performance over time.
• Assess the impact of your own marketing programs and
competitive activity on your brand’s equity.
• Identify opportunities and threats to your brand—
not just from competitors but from the category
as a whole.
• Determine the long-term potential of your brand and
its competitors.
• Integrate these findings to create better brand manage-
ment strategies.
For more information, please contact Tim Hoddap [email protected].
How Satisfied are your Customers?
The only true judge of quality is the customer. A quality-focused, customer-driven strategy creates industry leaders,which translates into profitability and success. All organi-zations must ask critical questions of their customers:
• Are they satisfied?
• What makes them satisfied or dissatisfied?
• What drives their behavior?
• What are their requirements?
• What do we need to do to keep them loyal?
• How do we perform against the competition?
• How can we deliver best-in-class customer service?
ACNielsen’s Customer eQ gives you the answers to thesequestions. A total approach to the measurement andmanagement of customer satisfaction, Customer eQoffers long-term strategic direction to optimize resourcesand build and maintain customer equity, beyond the lim-its of simple customer satisfaction measurement.
The Customer eQ Profitability-Loyalty Matrix providesorganizations with a focus for customer satisfactionimprovement directly linked to profitability. It identifies“Star” customers—those who are loyal and highlyprofitable to the company—and those customers that are “At Risk”—highly profitable to the organization, but not particularly loyal.
For more information, please contact Roxanne Menziesat [email protected].
Target Canadians Online
ACNielsen’s Internet Planner 2002 is a strategic blueprintfor understanding and trending Canadians online. Theinsights in this report will enable your business to identifyand leverage opportunities by fine tuning target segmentsand integrating findings into:
• Profitable online marketing and advertising programs
• Relevant promotions
| Consum
er Insight | Winter 2001
37
February 3–5Food Marketing InstituteMarketechnics ConventionACNielsen Booth # 2033Spectra Marketing Booth # 2133San Diego Convention CenterSan Diego, CA
February 11–14National Grocers Association2002 ConventionParis Las Vegas HotelLas Vegas, Nevada
January 13–15Food Marketing Institute Midwinter Executive ConferenceThe PhoenicianScottsdale,Arizona
January 13–15International Housewares ShowMcCormick PlaceChicago, Illinois
• Building brand awareness
• Strengthening loyalty programs
This annual study measures the attitudes and onlinebehaviour of a representative sample of Canadians.Included is a comprehensive demographic section thatprofiles a wide range of target groups from adultfemales, youth, and seniors to home-based businesses.
Core areas explored include:
• Effectiveness of web sites—tailor your online advertis-
ing programs to suit the needs and preferences of your
target market.
• E-commerce purchasing behaviour.
• Online Transactions—attitudes towards pricing and
online security.
• Usage and preferences with respect to advertising and
permission marketing.
• Telecommunications, Portals and ISPs—focuses on
emerging trends and opportunities.
• Financial Services—explores how online activity can
be used to market greater use of services such as day-
to-day banking, credit, investment and insurance.
• Government and Public Policy—focuses on trends and
the potential for leveraging the Internet as a vehicle to
enhance program delivery.
• Healthcare—examines the Internet as a source of
health-related products, services and information.
For more information, please contact Josie Cirasella [email protected].
Available in Canada only Available in USA only
Emphasize ?e-commerce
do I targetWho
Competeacross channels?
Who can afford to waste time wading throughinformation? You need consumer knowledge foraction. ACNielsen Homescan gives you consumershare of mind, wallet, basket and stomach.Scantrack offers unparalleled insight into the retailmarketplace—plus the tools you need to act.Contact your ACNielsen representative to learn more.Visit acnielsen.com. Or call 1.800.988.4ACN.
Cons
umer
kno
wle
dge
for
the
real
issu
esyo
u fa
ce e
very
day
.
HIGHEST QUALITY DATA | FASTEST DELIVERY SPEED | BEST CONSUMER COVERAGE | BEST RETAIL OUTLET COVERAGE© 2002 ACNielsen. ACNielsen is a trademark of A.C. Nielsen Company.
?