Transcript
Page 1: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

Thomas BishopGinger Edmonds

Daniel CarrierCory Facemire

Group 7

Page 2: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

Criteria for Company Framework

CIA Fact book

Research Insight

Company 10K for last five years

Individual Company Website

Yahoo Finance

Page 3: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

The Ranking System 1). Does the company include an external audit within their

10k Reports? Scoring: 0 – was not included in the reports 5 – included, but showed weak internal controls 10 – included and showed no internal control weakness

2). What is the degree that risk, controls and governance are mentioned within the reports? (Norway Government stds)

Scoring: 0 – if controls are only mentioned briefly 5 – if internal controls are mentioned in additional sections more than once 10 – internal controls are mentioned throughout the reports greater than two

different occurrences

Page 4: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

3.) Does the company disclose improvements about their internal controls?

Scoring: 0 – no mention of any weakness or strengths 5 – shows weakness within the system 10 – show improvements upon prior areas of weakness

4.) Does the company mention or show that management is ultimately responsible for the company’s internal controls?

Scoring : 0 – no mention of management responsibility 5 – show that management is held responsible for internal controls 10 – based on management’s evaluation of the company’s internal

controls are effective

Page 5: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

5). How well do the companies disclose their Internal Controls?

Scoring : 0 – no framework or structure was mentioned for internal controls

within the report 5-mention internal controls and disclosures 10 – internal controls substantially presented within the reports

6). How does the company rank according to it’s financial and operational risk?

Scoring : 0-High risk 5-Medium risk 10-Low risk

Page 6: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

STATOILHYDRO ASA

Integrated Oil & Gas

World’s largest operator in

water > 100 meters

Norwegian State holds 65%

Focus upstream oil & gas

operations

Wright Investment Services

Page 7: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

Scorecard: STATOILHYDRO ASAYear ended 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Question:

1 – External Audit 5 5 10 10 0

2 – RCG 0 0 0 5 10

3 – Improvements 10 10 5 5 5

4 – Mgmt Responsibility 0 0 0 0 0

5 – Internal Control 5 5 10 10 10

6 – Fin/Oper. Risk 5 5 5 5 5

Total: 25/60 25/60 30/60 35/60 30/60

Average: 24/60=40%

StrengthInternal Control

WeaknessManagement Responsibility

Page 8: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

AKER SOLUTIONS ASA Oil & Gas Exploration & Prod

Subsidiary to Aker Asa

Ownership

Multiple Industries

Wright Investment Services

Page 9: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

Scorecard: AKER SOLUTIONS ASA

Year ended 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Question:

1 External Audit 0 0 0 0 0

2 RCG 0 0 0 5 5

3 Improvements 5 5 10 10 10

4 Mgmt Responsibility 5 10 10 10 10

5 Internal Control 5 5 10 10 10

6 Fin/Oper. Risk 5 10 0 0 0

Total: 20/60 30/60 30/60 35/60 35/60

Average: 25/60=42%

StrengthManagement Responsibility

WeaknessRisk, control & governance

Page 10: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

SOLSTAD OFFSHORE ASA

Oil & Gas Drilling

29 vessels, 3 segments

1000 personal 73% @ sea

2216 million NOK

North Sea, Mediterranean,

West Africa, Asia, and

The Americas

Page 11: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

Scorecard: SOLSTAD OFFSHORE ASA

Year Ended: 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Question:

1 External Audit 0 0 0 0 0

2 RCG 5 5 5 5 10

3 Improvements 0 0 0 0 0

4 Mgmt Responsibility 0 0 0 0 0

5 Internal Control 5 5 5 5 5

6 Fin/Oper. Risk 5 5 5 5 5

Total: 15/60 15/60 15/60 15/60 15/60

Average: 15/60=25%

StrengthRisk, control & governance

WeaknessManagement Responsibility

Page 12: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

PGS-PETROLEUM GEO-SERVICES

Oil & Gas Drilling

Multi-client data library

Corporate Governance

Geophysical Services

Investor Relations

Page 13: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

Scorecard: PGS-PETROLEUM GEO-SERVICES

Year Ended: 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Question:

1 External Audit 5 5 0 10 10

2 RCG 0 0 5 5 5

3 Improvements 0 0 5 0 5

4 Mgmt Responsibility 5 5 5 10 10

5 Internal Controls 0 5 5 0 5

6 Fin/Oper. Risk 5 0 0 0 0

Total: 15/60 15/60 20/60 25/60 35/60

Average: 18/60=30%

StrengthExternal Audit

WeaknessFin/Oper. Risk

Page 14: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

REVUS ENERGY ASA Oil & Gas Exploration & Prod

Founded in 2002

Medium Sized company

Explores Norwegian continental

shelves

Page 15: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

Scorecard: REVUS ENERGY ASA

Year Ended: 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Question:

1 External Audit 0 0 5 5 5

2 RCG 0 0 5 5 10

3 Improvements 0 0 0 0 0

4 Mgmt Responsibility 0 0 0 5 5

5 Internal Controls 0 0 10 10 10

6 Fin/Oper. Risk 5 5 10 10 10

Total: 5/60 5/60 30/60 35/60 40/60

Average: 19/60=32%

StrengthFin/Oper. Risk

WeaknessImprovements

Page 16: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

SUBSEA 7 INC Oil & Gas Drilling

Global operations

5500 personal on & offshore

World leading subsea engineering

& construction

Page 17: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

Scorecard: SUBSEA 7 INC

Year Ended: 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007

Question:

1 External Audit 0 0 10 10 5

2 RCG 0 0 5 10 10

3 Improvements 0 0 0 0 0

4 Mgmt Responsibility 0 0 0 10 10

5 Internal Controls 0 0 10 10 10

6 Fin/Oper. Risk 0 5 0 10 10

Total: 0/60 5/60 25/60 50/60 45/60

Average: 21/60=35%

StrengthInternal Controls

WeaknessImprovements

Page 18: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

Recap of initial rankings

Page 19: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

Rankings of Criteria

Page 20: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

Conclusions: Higher income does not equal increased controls

Overall – internal and external controls were increased due to the implementation of IFRS in 2005

Aker Solutions & Solstad Solutions did not support an external audit in the past 5 years

There was an overall concern to increase governance after the implementation of IFRS in 2005

Page 21: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

Recommendations: Corruption control-government Institution of Internal Auditors Norway More External Audits Put more internal controls in place Invest in Statoilhydro Benchmark against Statiolhydro

Page 22: Information Systems  Security Norway Company  Analysis

Any Questions?


Recommended