Indices of Indices of Deprivation 2010Deprivation 2010
Overview of the Indices and Data for RotherhamCYPS Voluntary & Community Sector Consortium
Presentation 5th July 2011Elena Hodgson, RMBC Policy Team
Indices ofDeprivation 2010
• Commissioned by CLG• Produced by Oxford University• Updates the previous ID 2007• 7 Domains (38 indicators)• Index of Multiple Deprivation (IMD)• 2008/09 baseline• SOA Geography (166 in Rotherham)• 6 District Measures - 326 districts (-28)• Health warnings!
ID Domains &Weighting for IMD
Deprivation Domain Weight
Income 22.5%
Employment 22.5%
Health & Disability 13.5%
Education, Skills & Training 13.5%
Barriers to Housing & Services 9.3%
Living Environment 9.3%
Crime 9.3%
Rotherham Deprivationrelative to England
% of Rotherham population within English IMD deciles:
IMD 2004
IMD 2007
IMD 2010
Most Deprived 10% 12% 12% 17%
Most Deprived 20% 33% 32% 33%
Most Deprived 30% 49% 46% 46%
Most Deprived 50% 71% 65% 68%
Relationships with Deprived Areas
% of Rotherham
within English
IMD 2010 deciles
Pop BME Pak DLA CouncilHomes
ASB
Most Deprived 10% 17% 37% 48% 25% 32% 30%
Most Deprived 20% 33% 54% 58% 45% 62% 49%
Most Deprived 30% 46% 67% 71% 60% 78% 63%
Most Deprived 50% 68% 79% 88% 79% 93% 81%
IMD 2004 to 2010 - Rotherham
0%
5%
10%
15%
20%
25%
10% MostDeprived
10-20% 20-30% 30-40% 40-50% 50-60% 60-70% 70-80% 80-90% 10%Least
DeprivedEnglish SOA Deciles
% o
f Pop
ulat
ion
2004
2007
2010
District (2010 rank) 2004 2007 2010 Change
Rotherham (53) 17.8 19.2 16.3 - 1.5
Barnsley (47) 7.9 12.1 14.4 + 6.5
Doncaster (39) 11.3 11.6 12.0 + 0.7
Wigan (65) 15.0 18.9 19.9 + 4.9
St Helens (51) 10.2 13.3 15.6 + 5.4
Wakefield (67) 15.3 18.6 20.6 + 5.3
Stockton (100) 21.2 27.7 30.7 + 9.5
Redcar (48) 12.4 14.1 14.7 + 2.3
Sheffield (56) 16.9 17.8 17.2 + 0.3
District ComparisonChanges in Rank Percentile 2004 - 2010
IMD 2007(Wards shown)
IMD 2010(Wards shown)
Most Deprived SOAsin Top 3% of 32,482 English SOAs
SOA Ward Rank• East Herringthorpe North Valley 230 (+311)• Canklow North Boston Castle 434 (+335)• Eastwood East Rotherham East 641 (+379)• Town Centre Boston Castle 671 (+818)• East Dene East Rotherham East 707 (+349)• Thrybergh South / Chesterhill Valley 736 (+151)• Masbrough Rotherham West 847 (+287)• Ferham Rotherham West 851 (+182)• East Herringthorpe South Valley 920 (+595)
Deprivation by Domain
England: Top 10%
Change07 - 10
Top 20% Top 50%
Health 33% +8% 56% 97%
Education 24% - 4% 41% 74%
Employment 22% + 5% 38% 71%
Income 14% + 1% 30% 61%
Crime 11% + 8% 26% 67%
Environment 3% 0 6% 31%
“Barriers” 0% 0 1% 12%
Deprivation Drivers
• In a national context, Rotherham is most deprived in terms of:
Health & DisabilityEducation, Skills & TrainingEmployment
• Income & Crime deprivation above average• Child poverty most polarised (15 fold)
Health & Disability Domain 2010
Education & Skills Domain 2010
Employment Domain 2010
Crime Domain 2010
Closing the Gap?IMD Quintileswithin Rotherham
AverageScore2004
Average Score2007
AverageScore2010
Change2004-10
Change 2007-10
Most Deprived 20% 49.9 49.1 52.2 + 2.3 +3.1
Most Deprived 20-40% 35.6 34.4 36.4 + 0.8 + 2.0
Average Areas 25.8 23.9 25.1 - 0.7 +1.2
Least Deprived 20-40% 17.7 15.5 16.2 - 1.5 + 0.7
Least Deprived 20% 11.5 10.2 10.4 - 1.1 + 0.2
Rotherham Average 28.2 26.7 28.1 - 0.1 + 1.4
No!
Change 2007 – 10in WNP Target Areas
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
IMD
Sc
ore
IMD 2007
IMD 2010
Key Messages• Deprivation increasing, still Top 20%• Health Deprivation most severe• Improvements in Education but….
• Most deprived areas fared worst• Areas with low deprivation doing best
• New housing has reduced local deprivation scores• Polarised Crime, Health, Education & Employment• 17.6% deprived of income but….
– 23.4% children vs 14.3% working age adults
Policy Challenges
• Regeneration Initiatives– No plans to replace WNF– Mainstream tackling inequalities
• Prioritising Resources:– Closing the Gap / No Community Left Behind?– Past initiatives made little lasting impact– Lessons from Eastwood, Chesterhill & Local Ambition– Building sustainable & attractive communities (where
people want to live)– Joining-up services
• Tackling Ill-health & related issues
Links to Priorities
Strategic Priority(RMBC / LSP)
Relevant Domains
Key Policy Issues or Objectives
Access to Jobs, Training & Qualifications
Employment
Education
Raising adult skill levels
Reducing Long term unemployment
Ensure the best start in life Employment
Education
Health, Income
Reducing child poverty
Multi-agency prevention & early intervention
Providing quality education Education Raising attainment and aspiration in most deprived areas
Care & Support for vulnerable people
Health Support for disabled people
Health Promotion, Preventative care, Mental health
People happy & safe where they live
Crime
Environment
Reducing crime & ASB
Housing condition
Action Plan
• Cascade information within Council & LSP– Influence strategies & priorities– Include findings in service planning– Inform commissioning
• Check against latest data to update trends• Check underlying indicators when published• Include in refreshed publications:
– Community Strategy– JSNA & “Comprehensive Needs Assessment”– LASOS (www.lasos.org.uk)