Transcript
Page 1: Imaging Diagnosis of Osteoporotic Fracture

๋Œ€ํ•œ์˜์‚ฌํ˜‘ํšŒ์ง€ 67

Continuing Education Column

๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ(osteoporosis)์€ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์  ๊ณจ ๋„ ์ธก์ •๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ

๊ณจ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ์ฆ๋ช…ํ•˜๊ณ , ์งˆ์ ์ด์ƒ์„๋ฐฐ์ œํ•˜์—ฌ์ง„๋‹จํ•˜๋ฉฐ

๋‹ค๋ฅธ์งˆํ™˜๊ณผ๊ฐ๋ณ„ํ• ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒ™์ถ”๊ณจ์ ˆ์€๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์—์„œ

ํ”ํžˆ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์˜ ์œ„ํ—˜๋„๋ฅผ ์˜ˆ๊ฒฌํ•˜๋Š”

์ค‘์š”ํ•œ ์ธ์ž์ด๋‹ค. ์ผ๋‹จ ์ฒ™์ถ”๊ณจ์ ˆ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋ฉด ๋˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์ฒ™์ถ”

๊ณจ์ ˆ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์œ„ํ—˜๋„๊ฐ€ ํฌ๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Š” ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ ์ž…

์ฆ๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ 

ํ•™์ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ์†Œ๊ฒฌ์˜ํŠน์ง•๊ณผ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ๊ณผ๊ฐ๋ณ„์ดํ•„์š”ํ•œ์งˆํ™˜์—

๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๊ณ ์žํ•œ๋‹ค.

๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ ์ƒ ์ง„๋‹จ

1. ๋‹จ์ˆœ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ํ•™์ ์†Œ๊ฒฌ

๋‹จ์ˆœ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์‚ฌ์ง„์„์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณจ๊ฐ์†Œ์˜์œ ๋ฌด๋ฅผ์ง„๋‹จํ• ์ˆ˜

๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ ์ƒ ์ง„๋‹จ

Imaging Diagnosis of Osteoporotic Fracture์–‘ ์Šน ์˜ค | ์„์ง€์˜๋Œ€ ์ƒ์˜ํ•™์„ผํ„ฐ | Seoung -Oh Yang, MD

Department of Radiology, Eulji University College of MedicineE -mail : [email protected]

๊น€ ์„ฑ ์ค€ | ์—ฐ์„ธ์˜๋Œ€ ์ƒ์˜ํ•™๊ณผ | Sungjun Kim, MD

Department of Radiology, Yonsei University College of Medicine

์ • ์„  ๊ด€ | ์›๊ด‘์˜๋Œ€ ์ƒ์˜ํ•™๊ณผ | Seon-Kwan Juhng, MD

Department of Radiology, Wonkwang University College of Medicine

J Korean Med Assoc 2010; 53(1): 67 - 75

Osteoporotic vertebral fractures suspected at clinical evaluation require radiological confir-

mation. Most radiologists make the diagnosis of vertebral fracture on the basis of a quali-

tative impression. However, unlike other fractures, vertebral fractures are commonly found on

radiographs obtained for other reasons in patients who do not show signs or symptoms

suggestive of fractures. Radiologists qualitatively analyze radiographs of the thoracolumbar spine

to identify vertebral fractures in patients whose clinical indications suggest trauma, osteoporosis,

malignancy, or acute back pain. The accuracy of decision-making process can be enhanced by

additional radiographic projections or by complementary examinations including DXA (Dual

Energy X-ray Absorptiometry) morphometry, bone scan, CT, or MRI. The importance of imaging

is highlighted by the fact that only about one in four vertebral fractures is recognized on the basis

of clinical evaluations without radiographs. Radiographs may include lateral and AP (ante-

rior/posterior) X-rays of the affected spinal segments. The physician may request bone scan

and/or CT to help identify the location of the fracture, its status (stable versus unstable). Fur-

thermore, an MRI scan may be performed if neurologic deficit, soft tissue trauma or hematoma

are suspected.

Keywords: Osteoporosis; Vertebral fracture; Imaging diagnosis

ํ•ต ์‹ฌ ์šฉ ์–ด:๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ; ์ฒ™์ถ”๊ณจ์ ˆ; ์ƒ์ง„๋‹จ

Abstract

67_75์˜ํ•™๊ฐ•์ขŒ_์–‘์Šน์˜ค 2010.1.12 6:42 PM ํŽ˜์ด์ง€67 NO.3 InPut

Page 2: Imaging Diagnosis of Osteoporotic Fracture

68 ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ ์ƒ ์ง„๋‹จ

Yang SOยทKim SJยทJuhng SK

์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ์ฒ™์ถ”, ๋Œ€ํ‡ด๊ณจ๊ฒฝ๋ถ€, ์ค‘์ˆ˜๊ณจ๊ณผ์ข…๊ณจ๋“ฑ์„๊ฒ€์‚ฌํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹จ

์ˆœ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์‚ฌ์ง„์—์„œ ๊ณจ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋ฅผ ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ•˜๋Š” ํ‰๊ฐ€๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๋‹จ์ˆœ ์ฒ™

์ถ”์‚ฌ์ง„์—์„œ ๊ณจ๊ฒฐํ•์ฆ์˜ ์ •๋„๋ฅผ ์ ์ˆ˜ํ™”ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ตฌ๋ถ„ํ•œ Saville

index๊ฐ€์žˆ๋‹ค(Table 1, Figure 1)(1).

๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์ด์ง„ํ–‰๋ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ณจ์†Œ์ฃผ์˜๊ฐ์†Œ๋Š”์ฒ™์ถ”์ฒด์˜ํšก๋‹จ๊ณจ

์†Œ์ฃผ๊ฐ€์ข…๋‹จ๊ณจ์†Œ์ฃผ์—๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ๋จผ์ €์†Œ์‹ค๋œ๋‹ค. ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์˜๋‹จ์ˆœ

๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ํ•™์ ์†Œ๊ฒฌ์€๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ๊ฐ™์ง€๋งŒํŠน์ด์ ์†Œ๊ฒฌ์€์•„๋‹ˆ๋‹ค(2~6).

1) ๊ณจ์Œ ์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ: ์ฒ™์ถ”์˜ ์••๋ฐ•๊ณจ์ ˆ์ด ๋™๋ฐ˜๋œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š”

๊ณจ์†Œ์ฃผ์˜ ์ง‘๊ณผ ๊ฐ€๊ณจ(callus) ํ˜•์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณจ ๋„๊ฐ€

์˜คํžˆ๋ ค์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ• ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋‹ค.

2) ๊ณจํ”ผ์งˆ๋‘๊ป˜์˜๊ฐ์†Œ: ๊ณจํ”ผ์งˆ๋‚ด์ธต์˜ํก์ˆ˜์™€๊ณจํ”ผ์งˆ๋‚ด

๋ถ€์˜๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์ด๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค.

3) ๊ณจ์†Œ์ฃผ์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ์™€ ํ˜•ํƒœ ๋ณ€ํ™”: ๊ฐ๊ฐ์˜ ๊ณจ์†Œ์ฃผ๋Š” ์–‡์•„์ง€

๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์†Œ์‹ค๋˜๋ฉฐ, ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋Š” ์ˆ˜ํ‰๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜

๊ณจ์†Œ์ฃผ์—์ข€๋”๋šœ๋ ทํ•˜์—ฌ, ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ์ˆ˜์ง

๋ฐฉํ–ฅ์˜ ๊ณจ์†Œ์ฃผ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ•์กฐ๋˜์–ด ํ˜ˆ๊ด€์ข…

(hemangioma)๊ณผ ๋น„์Šทํ•œ ๋ชจ์Šต์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€

๋‚˜๊ธฐ๋„ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์ฒ™์ถ”์ฒด์˜์ƒํ•˜์—ฐ๊ณจํ•˜๊ณจ์ข…ํŒ

(subchondral bone plates)์€ ๊ฐ€๋Š˜์ง€๋งŒ

๋šœ๋ ทํ•ด์ง„๋‹ค.

4) ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋กœ์ธํ•œํ˜•ํƒœ๋ณ€ํ™”: ์ฒ™์ถ”์ฒด์•ž๋ถ€

๋ถ„์˜ ์๊ธฐํ˜•(wedge) ๊ณจ์ ˆ ํ˜น์€ ์ฒ™์ถ”์ฒด์™€

๋””์Šคํฌ ์—ฐ๊ฒฐ๋ถ€์˜ ๋‚˜๋น„ํ˜• ํ•จ๋ชฐ(biconca-

vity) ๋“ฑ์˜ ์••๋ฐ•๊ณจ์ ˆ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ๋‹ค. ์๊ธฐํ˜•

์ฒ™์ถ”์ฒด๋Š” ์ฒ™์ถ”์ฒด์˜ ์ „์—ฐ์˜ ๋†’์ด๋Š” ๊ฐ์†Œ๋˜

์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜ ํ›„์—ฐ์˜ ๋†’์ด๋Š” ์ •์ƒ์ด๊ณ , ์••์ถ•์€

์ฒ™์ถ”์ฒด์˜ ์ค‘์•™๋ถ€์œ„๋ฅผ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ํ›„์—ฐ ๋†’์ด์˜

๊ฐ์†Œ๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์••์ถ•์ด ์‹ฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์ผ์ •ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉด ํŒฌ์ผ€์ดํฌํ˜•

์ฒ™์ถ”์ฒด(pancake vertebrae)๊ฐ€ ๋œ๋‹ค(Figure 2). ์ฒ™์ถ”์ฒด์˜

์••์ถ•๊ณจ์ ˆ์€ํ•œ๋ฒˆ๋˜๋Š”์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ๋ฒˆ์˜์™ธ์ƒ์œผ๋กœ๋ฐœ์ƒํ• ์ˆ˜์žˆ๊ณ ,

๋งŒ์„ฑ์ ์ธ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ณจ์ ˆ(microfracture)๋กœ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ์ ์ง„์ ์œผ๋กœ๊ตฌ์กฐ

์ ์ธ ์žฌํ˜•์„ฑ์— ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋งŒ์„ฑ์ ์ธ ๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ณจ์ ˆ

์—์˜ํ•œ์••์ถ•์ด์ฒ™์ถ”์ฒด์˜์ค‘์•™๋ถ€์œ„์—๋งŒ๊ตญํ•œ๋˜์–ด๋ฐœ์ƒ๋œ์ฒ™

์ถ”์ฒด์˜๋ณ€ํ˜•์„๋‚˜๋น„ํ˜•ํ˜น์€ fish vertebrae๋ผ๊ณ ํ•œ๋‹ค.

๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„๋น„๋กฏํ•œ๋งŽ์€๋Œ€์‚ฌ์„ฑ์งˆํ™˜์€๊ณจ์กฐ์ง์„์•ฝํ™”์‹œ

์ผœ ์—ฐ๊ณจํ•˜ ๊ณจ์ข…ํŒ์ด ํŒŒ๊ดด๋˜์–ด ์ถ”๊ฐ„ํŒ ๋””์Šคํฌ ๋ฌผ์งˆ์˜ ์ผ๋ถ€

๊ฐ€ ์ฒ™์ถ”์ฒด ๋‚ด๋กœ ์ด๋™๋œ ์—ฐ๊ณจ์„ฑ ํ˜น์€ Schmorl ๊ฒฐ์ ˆ์ด ๋ณด์ผ

์ˆ˜์žˆ๋‹ค.

์ฒ™์ถ”์ „๋ฐฉ์˜๊ธธ์ด๊ฐ€๊ฐ์†Œ๋œ์ฒ™์ถ”๋Š”ํ‰์š”์ถ”์ดํ–‰๋ถ€์œ„์—๋งŽ

์œผ๋ฉฐ, 80%๋Š” ์ œ11 ํ‰์ถ”์—์„œ ์ œ2 ์š”์ถ”์— ๊ฑธ์ณ์„œ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋œ๋‹ค.

Table 1. Osteopenia score for vertebrae by Saville index

Radiographic appearance of vertebra

0 Normal bone density1 Minimal loss of density: endplates begin to stand out,

giving a stencilled effect2 Vertical striation is more obvious; endplates are thinner3 More severe loss of bone density than grade 2;

endplates becoming less visible4 Ghost-like vertebral bodies; density is no greater than

soft tissue; no trabecular pattern is visible

Figure 1. Diagram of Saville index (Insurance covered from Grade 3).

1

2

3

4

Figure 2. Various type of vertebral compression fractures: From left, wedge type,biconcave type, and pancake -like crushed vertebral fracture.

67_75์˜ํ•™๊ฐ•์ขŒ_์–‘์Šน์˜ค 2010.1.12 6:42 PM ํŽ˜์ด์ง€68 NO.3 InPut

Page 3: Imaging Diagnosis of Osteoporotic Fracture

์˜ํ•™๊ฐ•์ขŒImaging Diagnosis of Osteoporotic Fracture

๋Œ€ํ•œ์˜์‚ฌํ˜‘ํšŒ์ง€ 69

์ฒ™์ถ” ์ค‘์•™์ด ํ•จ๋ชฐ๋œ ๊ณ ๊ธฐ ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ๋ณ€ํ˜•์€ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ ์š”์ถ”์—์„œ

๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ œ12 ํ‰์ถ”์—์„œ ์ œ4 ์š”์ถ”๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ฑฐ์˜ ๊ท ๋“ฑํ•˜๊ฒŒ

๋ถ„ํฌ๋˜์–ด์žˆ๋‹ค. ์‹ฌํ•œ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆํ™˜์ž์—์„œ๋„์ฒ™์ถ”์ฒด์˜๊ณจ์ ˆ์€

์ผ๊ณฑ ๋ฒˆ์งธ ํ‰์ถ”์˜ ์œ„์—์„œ๋Š” ๋“œ๋ฌผ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ด๋ณด๋‹ค ์ƒ๋ถ€์—

๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚œ ์ฒ™์ถ”์ฒด์˜ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์ด ์žˆ์„ ๋•Œ์—๋Š” ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ๋ณ‘์  ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ ๊ฐ€

๋Šฅ์„ฑ์„์˜์‹ฌํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผํ•œ๋‹ค.

์š”์ถ” ์ธก๋ฉด ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์ดฌ ์˜ ์‹œ๊ฐ์  ๋ถ„์„์—๋Š”

๋‹จ์ˆœํŒ๋…๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š”ํ‘œ์ค€ํ™”๋œ๊ณ„๋Ÿ‰์ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์—์˜ํ•œ

๋ฐ˜์ •๋Ÿ‰์ (semiquantitative) ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ๋”์šฑ ์ •

ํ™•ํ•˜๋‹ค(Figure 3)(7).

2. ์ด์ค‘์—๋„ˆ์ง€๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ํก์ˆ˜๋ฒ•

(Dual Energy X-ray Absorptiometry, DXA)

DXA์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ ๊ณ„์ธก(morphometry)์€ ํ‰์ถ”

์™€์š”์ถ”๋ฅผ๋™์‹œ์—์ •๋Ÿ‰์ ์œผ๋กœ์ธก์ •ํ• ์ˆ˜์žˆ์–ด

๊ณจ ๋„ ์ธก์ •๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ์ฒ™์ถ”๊ณจ์ ˆ์„ ์ง„๋‹จ(Ver-

tebral Fracture Assessment, VFA)ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ

๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ์—๋Š” ์ดˆ์ฐฝ๊ธฐ DXA ์ƒ๋ณด๋‹ค ๋งŽ์ด ๊ฐœ

์„ ๋œํ•ด์ƒ๋„์˜๊ธฐ๊ณ„๊ฐ€๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๋˜์–ด์ฒ™์ถ”๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ํ‰๊ฐ€์—๋„๋ฆฌ์ด

์šฉ๋ ์ „๋ง์ด๋‹ค(Figure 4)(8, 9).

3. ๋ผˆ์Šค์บ”(Bone Scan)

๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์˜ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ์œผ๋กœ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š”๊ณจ์ ˆ(์ฒ™์ถ”์••๋ฐ•๊ณจ์ ˆ, ๋ถ€

Figure 3. Semiquantitative method to assess vertebral fractures. (Genant HK, et al. J Bone Mineral Res 1993; 8(9):1137-1148).

Figure 4. AP and lateral images of DXA vertebral morphometry.

67_75์˜ํ•™๊ฐ•์ขŒ_์–‘์Šน์˜ค 2010.1.12 6:42 PM ํŽ˜์ด์ง€69 NO.3 InPut

Page 4: Imaging Diagnosis of Osteoporotic Fracture

70 ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ ์ƒ ์ง„๋‹จ

Yang SOยทKim SJยทJuhng SK

์ „๊ณจ์ ˆ), ๋ฌดํ˜ˆ์„ฑ๊ดด์‚ฌ์™€๊ธ‰์„ฑ๊ดด์‚ฌ๋“ฑ์˜์ง„๋‹จ์—๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ํ•™์ 

์†Œ๊ฒฌ์„๋ณด์™„ํ•˜๊ธฐ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ๋ผˆ์Šค์บ”์ดํ”ํžˆ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋œ๋‹ค.

๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ์ด์ƒ์ด๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์ง€์•Š๋Š”๋ฏธ์„ธ๊ณจ์ ˆ์—์˜ํ•œ์š”

ํ†ต ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ๋„ ๋ผˆ์Šค์บ” ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ฑ ์˜์•ฝํ’ˆ์˜ ์ด์ƒ ์ง‘์ ์„ ํ”ํžˆ

๋ณผ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋‹ค.์ „์‹ ๋ผˆ์Šค์บ”์€์š”์ถ”์˜์ด์ƒ์†Œ๊ฒฌ์ด์™ธ์—๋Œ€ํ‡ด๊ณจ,

์†๋ชฉ, ๋Š‘๊ณจ, ์น˜๊ณจ๋“ฑ์˜๋ณ‘๋ณ€์„์ผ๋ชฉ์š”์—ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ์ง„๋‹จํ• ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋‹ค

(Figure 5). ๋˜ํ•œ๊ณจ์ ˆ์—๋™๋ฐ˜ํ• ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š”๊ณจ์ˆ˜์—ผ์ด๋‚˜์˜ˆ์ƒํ•˜

์ง€๋ชปํ•œ์ž„์ƒ๋ณ‘๋ณ€์˜๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ์—๋„๋„์›€์ด๋œ๋‹ค.

๋ผˆ์Šค์บ”์€ ์ฒ™์ถ”์••๋ฐ•๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ ์„ญ์ทจ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๊ฐ€ ๋Œ€๊ฐœ 18 ๋‚ด์ง€ 24

๊ฐœ์›”์—์†Œ์‹ค๋œ๋‹ค๊ณ ์•Œ๋ ค์ ธ์žˆ์–ด์„œ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜๋ฐœ์ƒ์‹œ๊ธฐ(age or

dating of the fracture)๋ฅผ์ง์ž‘ํ• ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š”์œ ์šฉํ•œ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด๋‹ค.

๋ฐ”๋Š˜๊ตฌ๋ฉ ๋ผˆ์Šค์บ”์ด๋‚˜ SPECT๋Š” ์ฒ™์ถ”๊ณจ์ ˆ๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ๋Œ€ํ‡ด๊ณจ๋‘

์˜๋ฌดํ˜ˆ์„ฑ๊ดด์‚ฌ์˜์ง„๋‹จ์—ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด๋‹ค. ๋ผˆ์Šค์บ”์˜์ถ”์ ๊ฒ€์‚ฌ๋กœ

์ ์ ์‹ฌํ•œ์„ญ์ทจ์ฆ๊ฐ€๊ฐ€๋ณด์ด๋ฉด์•…์„ฑ์ผ๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด๋†’๋‹ค(3, 4).

SPECT/CT ์žฅ๋น„๊ฐ€๋ณด๊ธ‰๋˜๊ธฐ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜ ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋‚˜๋ผ์—์„œ

๋„๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜์กฐ๊ธฐ์ง„๋‹จ์— SPECT/CT๊ฐ€์ด์šฉ๋ ๊ฒƒ

์œผ๋กœ๊ธฐ๋Œ€๋œ๋‹ค.

4. ์ „์‚ฐํ™”๋‹จ์ธต์ดฌ (CT)

CT๋Š”๊ด€์‹ฌ ์—ญ(Region of interest, ROI)์„์ž˜์„ค์ •ํ•˜๋Š”๊ฒƒ

์ด์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๊ฒ€์ถœ๊ธฐCT๊ฐ€๋ณดํŽธํ™”๋˜๋ฉด์„œCT 3์ฐจ์› ์ƒ์ด

๊ด„๋ชฉํ• ๋งŒํผ๋ฐœ์ „๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋‚˜, ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ๊ณจ์ ˆ์ž์ฒด์˜์ง„๋‹จ๋ณด๋‹ค

๋Š”์™ธ์ƒ์„ฑ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜์ง„๋‹จ์—ํ”ํžˆ์ด์šฉ๋˜๊ณ ์žˆ๋‹ค(Figure 6)(10).

5. ์ž๊ธฐ๊ณต๋ช… ์ƒ(MRI)

์ฒ™์ถ”๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜์ง„๋‹จ์—์žˆ์–ดMRI์˜์œ ์šฉ์„ฑ์€โ‘  ์–‘์„ฑ๊ณผ์•…์„ฑ

๋ณ‘๋ณ€์˜ ๊ฐ๋ณ„, โ‘ก ๊ธ‰์„ฑ๊ณผ ๋งŒ์„ฑ์˜ ๊ตฌ๋ณ„์— ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์–‘์„ฑ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜

MRI ์†Œ๊ฒฌ์€์ด์ƒ์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ณ‘๋ณ€์ด๊ณจ์ ˆ์„ ์„๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜

๊ณจ์ ˆ๋œ์ถ”์ฒด๋‚ด๋ถ€์—์ผ๋ถ€์˜์ •์ƒ์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ๋ณด์ด๋Š”๋ถ€๋ถ„์ด

ํฌํ•จ๋˜์–ด ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ, ์—ฐ๋ถ€์ข…๊ดด์˜ ํ˜•์„ฑ์ด ๋“œ๋ฌผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ช‡ ๊ฐœ์›” ๋‚ด์—

์ด์ƒ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ๋ณ‘๋ณ€์ด ์ •์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณ€ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ํ™•์‚ฐ๊ฐ•์กฐ ์ƒ(diffu-

sion-weighted images)์—์„œ์ €์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ๋ณด์ด๋Š”๊ฒƒ๋“ฑ์ด

๋‹ค(Figure 7). ์•…์„ฑ๊ณจ์ ˆ์€๊ณจ์ ˆ์ด์—†๋Š”์ฒ™์ถ”์—๋„์ด์ƒ์‹ ํ˜ธ

๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋Š” ๋ณ‘๋ณ€์ด ํ”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ณจ์ ˆ๋œ ์ถ”์ฒด์˜ ์ „์ฒด์— ์ด์ƒ ์‹ ํ˜ธ

๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ , ์ฒ™์ถ” ํ›„๋ฐฉ์ด ๋‘ฅ ๊ฒŒ ํŠ€์–ด๋‚˜์˜ค๊ฑฐ๋‚˜(convex) ์—ฐ

์กฐ์ง ์ข…๊ดด๋ฅผ ํ”ํžˆ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋ฉฐ, ์‹œ๊ฐ„ ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ๊ฐ•๋„์˜

์ด์ƒ์ด ์‹ฌํ•ด์ง€๊ณ , ๊ณจํŒŒ๊ดด๊ฐ€ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ, ํ™•์‚ฐ ๊ฐ•์กฐ ์ƒ์—์„œ ๊ณ 

์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ๋ณด์ด๋Š”ํŠน์ง•์ด์žˆ๋‹ค(Figure 8)(11~13).

์–‘์„ฑ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ MRI ์†Œ๊ฒฌ์€๊ฒฝ๊ณผ๋œ์‹œ๊ฐ„์—๋”ฐ๋ผ๋‹ค๋ฅด๋‹ค. ์˜ค

๋ž˜๋œ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์€ ์ •์ƒ ์ฒ™์ถ”์ฒด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ์ •๋„์˜ ๊ณจ์ˆ˜ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€

๋ชจ๋“  ์ƒ์—์„œ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ์ตœ๊ทผ์˜ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋Š” ๊ณจ์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ถ€์ข…

์— ์˜ํ•œ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ•๋„์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ ๊ณจ์ˆ˜์˜ ์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ•๋„๊ฐ€ T1

๊ฐ•์กฐ ์ƒ์—์„œ ์ €์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๊ณ  ์•ก์ฒด์— ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•œ ํŽ„์Šค์—ด

(fluid sensitive sequence)์ธ ์ง€๋ฐฉ์–ต์ œ T2 ๊ฐ•์กฐ ์ƒ์ด๋‚˜

STIR ์ƒ์—์„œ ๊ณ ์‹ ํ˜ธ ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค. ์—ฌ๊ธฐ์„œโ€˜์ตœ๊ทผโ€™์ด๋ผ

๋Š”๊ฒƒ์€๋ฐ”๋กœ์ง์ „์—๊ณจ์ ˆ์ด๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜ ์„์ˆ˜๋„์žˆ๊ณ ์ˆ˜๊ฐœ์›”

์ด์ง€๋‚ฌ์„์ˆ˜๋„์žˆ๋Š”๋งค์šฐ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ๋ฒ”์œ„์˜์‹œ๊ฐ„๊ฒฝ๊ณผ๋ฅผ๋งํ•˜

Figure 6. CT sagittal reconstructed image and 3 D reformation ofL2 vertebral fracture in 62 year-old male.

Figure 5. Compression fracture of the 1st lumbar vertebral bodyby bone scan (left) and sacral insufficiency fracture bybone SPECT (right).

67_75์˜ํ•™๊ฐ•์ขŒ_์–‘์Šน์˜ค 2010.1.12 6:42 PM ํŽ˜์ด์ง€70 NO.3 InPut

Page 5: Imaging Diagnosis of Osteoporotic Fracture

์˜ํ•™๊ฐ•์ขŒImaging Diagnosis of Osteoporotic Fracture

๋Œ€ํ•œ์˜์‚ฌํ˜‘ํšŒ์ง€ 71

๋Š”๊ฒƒ์ด๋ฉฐํ™˜์ž๊ฐœ์ธ์˜์ฒด์งˆ, ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ํ˜•ํƒœ, ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜์ •๋„๋“ฑ์—

๋”ฐ๋ผ๋‹ค์–‘ํ• ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š”๊ฒƒ์„์•Œ์•„๋‘์–ด์•ผํ•œ๋‹ค. ํ•œ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์˜

ํ•˜๋ฉด ๊ณจ์ ˆ์ด ์ƒ๊ธฐ๋ฉด ์ง€๋„์ƒ(geographic)์˜ ๊ณจ์ˆ˜ ๋ถ€์ข…์ด

MRI์—์„œ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๋ณด์ด๊ฒŒ ๋˜๊ณ , ์ด ํ™˜์ž ์ค‘ 40%์—์„œ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์ด

์ผ์–ด๋‚œ ํ›„ 3๊ฐœ์›”๊นŒ์ง€๋Š” MRI์ƒ ๊ณจ์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ถ€์ข…์ด ์ ์  ์ฆ๊ฐ€ํ•˜

๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด๊ณ ํ•˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๊ทธ ์ดํ›„์—๋Š” ์ ์  ๊ณจ์ˆ˜์˜ ๋ถ€์ข…

์ด์ค„์–ด๋“ค๋ฉด์„œ์ •์ƒ๊ณจ์ˆ˜์˜์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ•๋„๋ฅผ๋งค์šฐ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•œ์†๋„๋กœ

ํšŒ๋ณตํ•˜๋Š”๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ๋ณด๊ณ ํ•˜๊ณ ์žˆ๋‹ค(14).

ํ‰์š”์ถ”๋ถ€์—๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ์••๋ฐ•๊ณจ์ ˆ์ด์žˆ๋Š”๊ฒฝ์šฐ์ฒœ์ถ”์—๊ธฐ

๋Šฅ๋ถ€์ „๊ณจ์ ˆ(insufficiency fracture)์ด ๋™๋ฐ˜๋˜๋Š” ๋นˆ๋„๋Š”

10% ๋‚ด์™ธ๋กœ๋ณด๊ณ ๋˜๊ณ ์žˆ์–ด๋“œ๋ฌผ์ง€์•Š์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ์œ ์˜ํ•ด์•ผํ•œ๋‹ค

(15). ์ฒœ์ถ”์˜๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๋ถ€์ „๊ณจ์ ˆ์€๋งค์šฐ์‹ฌํ•œ๊ณจ๋ฐ˜ํ†ต์ฆ์„์ผ์œผํ‚ด

์—๋„๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ ๋•Œ๋•Œ๋กœ๊ฐ„๊ณผ๋˜์–ดํ™˜์ž๊ฐ€์›์ธ๋„๋ชจ๋ฅธ์ฑ„์˜ค๋žœ

๊ธฐ๊ฐ„๊ณ ํ†ต์Šค๋Ÿฌ์›€์„๊ฐ๋‚ดํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผํ•˜๋Š”์ƒํ™ฉ์—๋น ์ง€๊ฒŒํ• ์ˆ˜๋„

์žˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ๊ณ ๋ นํ™˜์ž์˜MRI๋ฅผ๊ด€์ฐฐํ• ๋•Œ์ด๋ฅผ๋†“์น˜์ง€์•Š๋„๋ก

์ฃผ์˜ํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผํ•œ๋‹ค.

MRI์—์„œ๋Š” ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ ๊ณจ๋ถ€์ข…(fat suppressed T2WI๋‚˜

STIR์™€๊ฐ™์€ fluid sensitive sequence)์„๋™๋ฐ˜ํ•˜๋Š”๊ณจ์ ˆ์„ 

Figure 7. MRI finding of benign vertebral fracture: T2 WI, T1 WI, T1 contrast enhanced image (from left).

Figure 8. MRI finding of malignant vertebral fracture: T2 WI, T1 WI, T1 contrast enhanced image (from left). Note the exophytic softtissue mass and signal changes in the whole spine.

67_75์˜ํ•™๊ฐ•์ขŒ_์–‘์Šน์˜ค 2010.1.12 6:42 PM ํŽ˜์ด์ง€71 NO.3 InPut

Page 6: Imaging Diagnosis of Osteoporotic Fracture

72 ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ ์ƒ ์ง„๋‹จ

(์ฃผ๋กœ T1WI์—์„œ)์˜ ํ˜•ํƒœ๋กœ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ, ๊ณจ๋ถ€์ข…์ด ์‹ฌํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—

๋Š” ๊ณจ๊ฐ์—ผ์ด๋‚˜ ๊ณจ์ „์ด ๋“ฑ๊ณผ ๊ฐ๋ณ„์ด ์–ด๋ ค์šด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ„ํ˜น ์žˆ

๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜ํŠน์ง•์ ์ธ ์ƒ์†Œ๊ฒฌ๊ณผ์ž„์ƒ์–‘์ƒ์„์ข…ํ•ฉํ•˜๋ฉด์–ด๋ ต

์ง€์•Š๊ฒŒ์ง„๋‹จํ• ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒœ์ถ”์˜๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๋ถ€์ „๊ณจ์ ˆ์€์‹ฌํ•œํ†ต์ฆ

์„ ์œ ๋ฐœํ•˜๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฒฝ๊ฐ์‹œํ‚ฌ ๋ชฉ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ฒ™์ถ”์„ฑํ˜•์ˆ ๊ณผ ๋™์ผ

ํ•œ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์œผ๋กœ ๊ณจ์ ˆ ๋ถ€์œ„์— polymethymethaacrylate

(PMMA)๋ฅผ ์ฃผ์ž…ํ•˜๋Š” ์ฒœ์ถ”์„ฑํ˜•์ˆ (sacroplasty)์ด ์ตœ๊ทผ์—

์ด์šฉ๋˜์–ด ํ™˜์ž์˜ ๊ณ ํ†ต์„ ์ค„์ด๋Š” ๋ฐ ๋งŽ์€ ๋„์›€์„ ์ฃผ๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค

(Figure 9).

๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์˜ ๊ฐ๋ณ„์ง„๋‹จ

1. ์•…์„ฑ์ข…์–‘์˜๊ณจ์ „์ด

์š”๋ฐฐํ†ต์˜ ๊ฐ๋ณ„์ด ์ž„์ƒ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค๊ณ  ์ƒ๊ฐ๋˜๋Š”๋ฐ ๊ณจ

๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์˜ ๊ธ‰์„ฑ๊ธฐ์— ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š” ์š”๋ฐฐํ†ต์€ ์‹œ๊ฐ„์ด ์ง€๋‚˜๋ฉด ๊ฐ์†Œ

ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ๊ณ , ์˜คํžˆ๋ ค ํ†ต์ฆ์ด ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋˜

๋Š”๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—์•”์˜์ „์ด๋ฅผ์ƒ๊ฐํ•ด๋ณผํ•„์š”๊ฐ€์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ

์•…์„ฑ ์ข…์–‘์˜ ์ฒ™์ถ”์ „์ด์—์„œ๋Š” ์•…์„ฑ ์ข…์–‘์— ์ˆ˜๋ฐ˜๋˜๋Š” ๊ณ ์นผ์Š˜

์ฆ์„ ์ œ์™ธํ•˜๊ณ ๋Š” ๋ฏธ๋งŒ์„ฑ์˜ ๊ณจ๊ฒฐํ•์ฆ์„ ์ผ์œผํ‚ค๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋Š” ์ 

๊ณ , ๊ตญ์†Œ์ ์ธ ๊ณจ๊ฒฐํ•์ฆ์„ ๋ณด์ด๋ฉฐ ๊ณจํŒŒ๊ดด๊ฐ€ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด

๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ๊ณผ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ์ ์ธ ์ฐจ์ด์ ์ด๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ ๊ณจ์ „์ด์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฒ™์ถ”

ํ›„๋ฐฉ์ฒด(posterior element)์˜ ํŒŒ๊ดด๊ฐ€ ํ˜„์ €ํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ด

๋“ค๋ถ€์œ„๋ฅผ์ฃผ์˜๊นŠ๊ฒŒ๊ด€์ฐฐํ• ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ „์ด๋ถ€์œ„๋Š”์š”์ถ”

๊ฐ€๊ฐ€์žฅ๋งŽ๊ณ ๋‹ค์Œ์œผ๋กœํ‰์ถ”ํ•˜๋ถ€์ด๋‹ค. ์ถ”์ฒด์˜๊ณจ์ ˆ๋ชจ์–‘์ž

์ฒด๋Š” ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ๊ณผ ํฐ ์ฐจ์ด๊ฐ€ ์—†์œผ๋‚˜ ๊ณจ์˜ ์œค๊ณฝ์— ์›จ์ดํผ

(wafer) ๋ชจ์–‘์˜ ์••๋ฐ•๊ณจ์ ˆ์ด ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜๋ฉด ๊ณจ์ „์ด ๋“ฑ์„ ์˜์‹ฌํ• 

์ˆ˜์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ CT๋‚˜MRI์—์„œ์ถ”์ฒดํ›„๋ฒฝ์˜ํŒฝ์ฐฝ์ด๋‚˜ํŒŒ๊ดด๊ฐ€๊ด€

์ฐฐ๋  ๋•Œ ๊ณจ์ „์ด๋ฅผ ์˜์‹ฌํ•ด์•ผ ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ๊ณจ์ „์ด์—์„œ๋Š” ์ข…์ข… ๊ฒฝ์ถ”

์ „์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์ถ”์— ๊ณจ์ ˆ์„ ์ดˆ๋ž˜ํ•˜

๋Š”์ผ์€๋“œ๋ฌผ๊ธฐ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—๊ฒฝ์ถ”์˜์••๋ฐ•๊ณจ์ ˆ์€๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์ด์™ธ์˜

๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์›์ธ์„ ์˜์‹ฌํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ณจ์ „์ด๊ฐ€ ์˜์‹ฌ๋  ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ฒ™์ถ”

์ด์™ธ์— ๋Š‘๊ณจ, ๊ณจ๋ฐ˜, ์‚ฌ์ง€ ์žฅ๊ณจ์˜ ๊ณจ๊ฐ„๋‹จ๋ถ€๋ฅผ ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„  ์ดฌ ์œผ

๋กœ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋ผˆ์Šค์บ”์„ ๋ฐ”๋กœ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ง„

๋‹จํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ ์กฐ๊ธฐ์ง„๋‹จ์ด ์–ด๋ ค์šด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€

์žˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ์˜์‹ฌ์ด๊ฐˆ๋•Œ๋Š”๋ผˆ์Šค์บ”๊ณผ CT, MRI ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ƒ์ง„๋‹จ

์„๋ณ‘์šฉํ•ด์•ผํ•œ๋‹ค(16).

๋ผˆ์Šค์บ”์—์„œ ์ด์ƒ ์ง‘์ ์ด ๋‹ค๋ฐœ์„ฑ์œผ๋กœ ๊ด€์ฐฐ๋˜์—ˆ์„ ๋•Œ ๊ณจ์ „

์ด์˜๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด๋†’์œผ๋ฉฐ, MRI๋Š”์••๋ฐ•๊ณจ์ ˆ์ด์ข…์–‘์—์˜ํ•œ๊ฒƒ์ธ

์ง€๋ฅผํŒ๋‹จํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ๋„์›€์„์ค€๋‹ค. ๊ณจ์ „์ด๋ณ‘์†Œ์—์„œ๋Š”์ข…์–‘์„ธํฌ

์˜์กด์žฌ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—T1 ๊ฐ•์กฐ ์ƒ์—์„œ์ €์‹ ํ˜ธ๊ฐ€๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚œ๋‹ค. ๊ณจ์ „์ด

๋Š”์ถ”์ฒด์ „์ฒด๊ฐ€์ €์‹ ํ˜ธ๋ฅผ๋ณด์ด๋Š”๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์ด์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œCT, MRI

๋กœ์ถ”์ฒด๋‚ด๋ถ€๋‚˜์ฃผ์œ„๋กœ์—ฐ์กฐ์ง์ข…๊ดด์˜ํ˜•์„ฑ์ด๊ด€์ฐฐ๋ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ณจ

์ „์ด์˜๊ฐ€๋Šฅ์„ฑ์ด์•„์ฃผ๋†’๋‹ค. ๊ทธ๋Ÿฌ๋‚˜์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ์†Œ๊ฒฌ๋“ค์€์–‘์„ฑ๊ณผ

์•…์„ฑ์‚ฌ์ด์—์–ด๋Š์ •๋„๊ฒน์นจ(overlap)์ด์žˆ์–ดํ™˜์ž์˜๋ณ‘์„ธ๊ฐ€

์ข‹์•„์ง€๋Š”์ชฝ์ธ์ง€, ๋‚˜๋น ์ง€๋Š”์ชฝ์ธ์ง€์—๋Œ€ํ•œ์ •๋ณด๋“ฑ์ „๋ฐ˜์ ์ธ

ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์ž„์ƒ๊ฒฝ๊ณผ์™€ ์ƒ๊ด€์ง€์–ด์„œ ํŒ๋…์ด ์ด๋ฃจ์–ด์ง€๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋ฉฐ ๊ฐ

๋ณ„์ด๊ฑฐ์˜๋ถˆ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•œ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋„์ ์ง€์•Š๊ฒŒ๋งŒ๋‚˜๊ฒŒ๋œ๋‹ค. ์ด๋ฅผ๊ทน

๋ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ํ˜„์„ฑํ™•์‚ฐ๊ณ„์ˆ˜ ์ง€๋„(ADC map)์„ ํฌํ•จํ•œ ํ™•

์‚ฐ๊ฐ•์กฐ ์ƒ๋“ฑ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ๊ฐ€์ง€ ์ƒ๊ธฐ์ˆ ์„์‹œ๋„ํ•˜๊ณ ์žˆ์œผ๋‚˜์ด๋“ค

๊ธฐ์ˆ ์˜ํšจ์šฉ์„ฑ์—๋Œ€ํ•ด์„œ๋Š”์•„์ง๋…ผ๋ž€์˜์—ฌ์ง€๊ฐ€์žˆ๋‹ค(17).

Yang SOยทKim SJยทJuhng SK

Figure 9. MRI finding of sacral insufficiency fracture: Fat suppressed sagittal T2 WI, axial T1 WI, axial fat suppressed T1 WI (from left).

67_75์˜ํ•™๊ฐ•์ขŒ_์–‘์Šน์˜ค 2010.1.12 6:42 PM ํŽ˜์ด์ง€72 NO.3 InPut

Page 7: Imaging Diagnosis of Osteoporotic Fracture

๋Œ€ํ•œ์˜์‚ฌํ˜‘ํšŒ์ง€ 73

2. ๋‹ค๋ฐœ์„ฑ๊ณจ์ˆ˜์ข…(Multiple Myeloma)

๋‹ค๋ฐœ์„ฑ๊ณจ์ˆ˜์ข…์€๋ชจ๋“ ์•”์˜ 1% ์ •๋„๋ฅผ์ฐจ์ง€ํ•˜๋Š”ํ”ํ•œ์ข…

์–‘์œผ๋กœ ํ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ ์ดํ›„์— ํ˜ธ๋ฐœํ•˜๋ฉฐ ๋•Œ๋กœ๋Š” ์ฒ™์ถ”์••๋ฐ•๊ณจ์ ˆ์ด ๋‚˜

ํƒ€๋‚˜๋ฏ€๋กœ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์˜๊ฐ๋ณ„์ง„๋‹จ์—๊ผญ๊ธฐ์–ตํ•ด์•ผํ•œ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋ฐœ์„ฑ

๊ณจ์ˆ˜์ข…์˜ ์ „ํ˜•์  ์˜ˆ๋Š” ๋‘๊ฐœ๊ณจ ๋“ฑ์— punched-out ํ˜•ํƒœ์˜

์„ ๋ช…ํ•œ ๊ณจํŒŒ๊ดด์™€ ๋ณ€์—ฐ๋ถ€์˜ ๋ถˆ๊ทœ์น™ํ•œ ๊ณจ๊ฒฐํ•์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ธ๋‹ค

(Figure 10). ์š”๋ฐฐํ†ต์„๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š”์ฆ๋ก€์—์„œ์••๋ฐ•๊ณจ์ ˆ์„๋™๋ฐ˜

ํ•˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์ด ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—๋Š” ๋ผˆ์Šค์บ”์˜ ์ด์ƒ์ง‘์ ์„

๋ณผ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋ฐœ์„ฑ๊ณจ์ˆ˜์ข…์˜ ์ƒ์ง„๋‹จ์—๋Š” CT๋‚˜MRI๊ฐ€๋Œ€

๋‹จํžˆ ์œ ์šฉํ•˜๋ฉฐ(๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์™€

๋‹ฌ๋ฆฌ MRI์˜ ์กฐ ์ฆ๊ฐ•์ด ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚œ๋‹ค)

๋‹จ์ˆœ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ์ดฌ ์—์„œ๋น„ํŠน์ด์ ์†Œ๊ฒฌ

์„ ๋ณด์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ์ด ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์„ ์ ๊ทน์ ์œผ

๋กœ ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ฒ™์ถ”์˜

์••๋ฐ•๊ณจ์ ˆ์—์„œ๋‹ค๋ฐœ์„ฑ๊ณจ์ˆ˜์ข…์ด๋ฐœ๊ฒฌ

๋˜๋Š” ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ํŠนํžˆ ์ฒ™์ถ”์••๋ฐ•๊ณจ

์ ˆ๊ณผ ๋นˆํ˜ˆ, ๊ณจ์ˆ˜์ข… ์‹ ์žฅ(myeloma

kidney)์ด ์กด์žฌํ•  ๋•Œ ์‰ฝ๊ฒŒ ์ง„๋‹จํ• 

์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹ค๋ฐœ์„ฑ ๊ณจ์ˆ˜์ข…์—์„œ๋Š” ํ™”ํ•™

์š”๋ฒ•์ด ์œ ํšจํ•˜๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์˜์‹ฌ๋˜๋Š”

๊ฒฝ์šฐ ํ˜ˆ์•ก๊ฒ€์‚ฌ, ๋ฉด์—ญ์ •์ง€ ๋™์ด๋‚˜

๊ณจ์ˆ˜์ฒœ์ž ๋“ฑ์„ ์‹ค์‹œํ•˜์—ฌ ์•…์„ฑ ๋ฆผํ”„

์ข…๊ณผ ๋ฐฑํ˜ˆ๋ณ‘ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๋‹ค๋ฅธ ์„ธํฌ์นจ์œค์—

์˜ํ•œ์งˆํ™˜๊ณผ๊ฐ๋ณ„ํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผํ•œ๋‹ค.

3. ๊ณจ์—ฐํ™”์ฆ

๊ณจ์—ฐํ™”์ฆ์€ ๊ณจ์˜ ์„ฑ๋ถ„ ์ค‘์—์„œ ์œ 

๊ณจ์˜ ์–‘์€ ์ •์ƒ์ด๋‚˜ ์ƒ๋Œ€์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณจ

๋ฌด๊ธฐ์งˆ์˜ ์†Œ์‹ค์ด ๋งŽ์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋ฅผ ๋งํ•œ

๋‹ค. ์†Œ์•„์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ตฌ๋ฃจ๋ณ‘(rickets)์ด๋ผ

ํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์นผ์Š˜๊ณผ ์ธ(phosphorus)์˜ ๋Œ€

์‚ฌ์— ์ด์ƒ์ด ์ƒ๊ฒจ ๊ณจ์— ์นจ์ฐฉํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ

๋ณด๋‹ค ๋น ์ ธ ๋‚˜์˜ค๋Š” ์–‘์ด ๋งŽ์€ ์งˆํ™˜์€

๋ชจ๋‘ ๊ทธ ์›์ธ์ด ๋  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์žฅ, ๊ฐ„,

์‹ ์žฅ ๋“ฑ์˜ ์ด์ƒ์ด ์žˆ์„ ๋•Œ ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•  ์ˆ˜

์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋“œ๋ฌผ๊ฒŒ ์ข…์–‘๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋˜์–ด ๋ฐœ์ƒ

ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ณจ์—ฐํ™”์ฆ๋„ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์–ด๋Š ์—ฐ๋ น์—์„œ๋„ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์ฆ

์ƒ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ์ „์‹ ์ ์ธ ๊ณจํ†ต์ฆ๊ณผ ์••ํ†ต์„ ํ˜ธ์†Œํ•˜๋ฉฐ ์ค‘์ถ•๊ณจ๋ณด๋‹ค

๋Š”์‚ฌ์ง€๊ณจ์—์ฆ์ƒ์„๋™๋ฐ˜ํ•œ๋‹ค. ๊ณจ์—ฐํ™”์ฆ์˜๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ํ•™์ ์†Œ๊ฒฌ

์€๊ณจ์˜์„ํšŒํ™”๊ฐ€์žฅ์• ๋ฅผ๋ฐ›์•„์„ํšŒํ™”๊ณจ์ด๊ฐ์†Œํ•˜๊ธฐ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—

ํ˜„์ €ํ•œ๊ณจ๊ฒฐํ•์„๋ณด์ผ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด๋•Œ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์—์„œ๋Š”๊ณจ์†Œ

์ฃผ๋‚˜ ์ถ”์ฒด์ข…ํŒ์˜ ์Œ ์ด ์„ ๋ช…ํ•œ๋ฐ ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ถ”์ฒด๊ฐ€ ์ „์ฒด์ ์œผ

๋กœ๋ถˆํ™•์‹คํ•˜๊ฒŒํ๋ ค์ง€๋Š”(fuzzy, coarsened) ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„๋ณด์ธ๋‹ค

(Figure 11). ํ˜„์ €ํ•œ ๊ณจ๊ฒฐํ• ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ๋ฌผ๊ณ ๊ธฐ์ฒ™์ถ”์ฒด ๋ชจ์–‘์˜

์ฒ™์ถ”๋ณ€ํ˜•(fish vertebrae)์ด ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ถ”์ฒด์—์„œ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ

์˜ํ•™๊ฐ•์ขŒImaging Diagnosis of Osteoporotic Fracture

Figure 10. Simple radiographs of two cases with multiple myeloma: Heterogenous osteolyticbone loss and biconcave fractures.

Figure 11. Simple radiographs of osteomalacia: See the apparent vertebral end-plates withfuzzy appearance.

67_75์˜ํ•™๊ฐ•์ขŒ_์–‘์Šน์˜ค 2010.1.12 6:42 PM ํŽ˜์ด์ง€73 NO.3 InPut

Page 8: Imaging Diagnosis of Osteoporotic Fracture

74 ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ ์ƒ ์ง„๋‹จ

๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ๊ณ , ํŠนํžˆ ํ‰์ถ”์— ์–ด์ถ” ๋ณ€ํ˜•์„ ๋ณด์ผ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ๋ณด๋‹ค

๋Š”์˜คํžˆ๋ ค๊ณจ์—ฐํ™”์ฆ์„์ƒ๊ฐํ•˜์—ฌ์•ผํ•œ๋‹ค(18).

4. ํ™”๋†์„ฑ์ฒ™์ถ”์—ผ, ์ถ”๊ฐ„ํŒ์—ผ, ๊ฒฐํ•ต์„ฑ์ฒ™์ถ”์—ผ

๊ณ ๋ น์ž์—์„œ์˜์š”๋ฐฐํ†ต์ดํ™”๋†์„ฑ์ฒ™์ถ”์—ผ๋“ฑ์˜์—ผ์ฆ์„ฑ์งˆํ™˜

์— ๊ธฐ์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜๋„ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณ ๋ น์ž๋Š” ๋ฉด์—ญ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์ด ์ €ํ•˜๋˜์–ด ์žˆ๊ณ 

ํŠนํžˆ๋‹น๋‡จ๋ณ‘์ด๋‚˜์•…์„ฑ์ข…์–‘์ด๋ณ‘๋ฐœํ•˜๋Š”๊ฒฝ์šฐ๋Š”์ด๋“ค๊ฐ์—ผ์„ฑ

์งˆํ™˜์— ์œ ์˜ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ด๋“ค ์งˆํ™˜์— ์˜

ํ•œ ๋™ํ†ต์€ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ๋ณด๋‹ค ์‹ฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์ง€์†์ ์ด๋ฉฐ ์ž„์ƒ์ƒํƒœ๋‚˜ ๋ฐฉ

์‚ฌ์„ ์†Œ๊ฒฌ์ดํŠน์ง•์ ์ด๊ธฐ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—์ด์งˆํ™˜๋“ค์„์—ผ๋‘์—๋‘”๋‹ค๋ฉด

๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ๊ณผ์˜๊ฐ๋ณ„์€์‰ฝ๋‹ค. ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ํ•™์ ์œผ๋กœ์ถ”๊ฐ„ํŒ์˜ํ˜‘์ฐฉ

๊ณผ์†Œ์‹ค, ์ถ”์ฒด์˜ํŒŒ๊ดด์–‘์ƒ์„๋ณด์ด๋Š”๊ฒƒ์ด๊ฐ๋ณ„์ ์ด๋˜๋ฉฐ๊ณจ

๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ถ”๊ฐ„ํŒ์˜ ํ˜‘์ฐฉ์ด ์—†๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์ด ํŠน์ง•

์ด๋‹ค. ์ถ”์ฒด์˜ ํŒŒ๊ดด ์–‘์ƒ์€ ๋‹ค์–‘ํ•˜๋ฉฐ ํ™”๋†์„ฑ ์ฒ™์ถ”์—ผ์—์„œ๋Š”

๋ฐ˜์‘์„ฑ์ธ ๊ณจ๊ฒฝํ™”๋ฅผ ๋ณผ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š”๋ฐ ๋น„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ฒฐํ•ต์„ฑ ์ฒ™์ถ”์—ผ์€

๊ณจ๊ฒฝํ™”๊ฐ€์ ์€๊ฒƒ์ดํŠน์ง•์ด๋‹ค(19).

5. ๊ธฐํƒ€ ๊ฐ๋ณ„์งˆํ™˜

์•ž์„œ์–ธ๊ธ‰ํ•œ๊ณจ์ „์ด์™€๋‹ค๋ฐœ์„ฑ๊ณจ์ˆ˜์ข…์ด์™ธ์—๊ณจ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ์นจ๋ฒ”

ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚˜๋Š” ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ ํ•™์  ์–‘์ƒ์ด ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ๊ณผ ์œ ์‚ฌํ•œ ์งˆํ™˜

์œผ๋กœ ๋นˆํ˜ˆ(ํŠนํžˆ sickle cell anemia์™€ thalassemia), ์ €์žฅ

์„ฑ ์งˆํ™˜(storage disease; Gaucherโ€™s disease์™€ Niemann

Pickโ€™s disease), ๋ฐฑํ˜ˆ๋ณ‘(leukemia) ๋“ฑ์ด์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ฒญ์†Œ๋…„๊ธฐ์˜

idiopathic juvenile osteoporosis์™€ juvenile chronic

arthritis, ๊ณจํ˜•์„ฑ๋ถ€์ „์ฆ(osteogenesis imperfecta), ๊ดดํ˜ˆ๋ณ‘

(scurvy) ๋“ฑ์€ ๋‚˜์ด์™€ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ž„์ƒ ์†Œ๊ฒฌ์œผ๋กœ ์ง„๋‹จ ๊ฐ€๋Šฅํ•˜๋‹ค.

์ด ์™ธ์— ๋ถ€๋ถ„์  ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ด๋Š” ๋ถˆ์šฉ์„ฑ(disuse) ๊ณจ๋‹ค

๊ณต์ฆ, ์ผ๊ณผ์„ฑ ๊ตญ์†Œ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ(transient regional osteo-

porosis), ๋ฐ˜์‚ฌ์„ฑ ๊ต๊ฐ์‹ ๊ฒฝ ์ด ์–‘์ฆํ›„๊ตฐ(reflex sympa-

thetic dystrophy syndrome, RSDS) ๋“ฑ์ด ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์˜ ๊ฐ

๋ณ„์ง„๋‹จ์—ํฌํ•จ๋œ๋‹ค.

๊ฒฐ ๋ก 

๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์€ ์ „์‹ ์„ฑ ์งˆํ™˜์œผ๋กœ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์  ๊ณจ ๋„์ธก์ •๋ฒ•์„ ์ด

์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ์ง„๋‹จํ•˜๋Š”๊ฒƒ์ด์ผ๋ฐ˜์ ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์—๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜

๋Š” ๊ณจ์ ˆ์€ ๊ณจ ๋„ ์ธก์ •๊ณผ ํ•จ๊ป˜ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์ง„๋‹จ์— ์ค‘์š”ํ•˜๋ฉฐ

๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์˜์œ„ํ—˜๋„๋ฅผ์˜ˆ์ธกํ• ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š”์ฃผ์ธ์ž์ค‘ํ•˜๋‚˜์ด๋‹ค.

ํŠนํžˆ์ฒ™์ถ”์—๋ฐœ์ƒํ•˜๋Š”๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ๊ณจ์ ˆ์€๊ฐ€์žฅ๋นˆ๋„๊ฐ€๋†’์ง€

๋งŒ, ํŠน๋ณ„ํ•œ ์ž„์ƒ์ฆ์ƒ์ด ์—†๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ฒ™์ถ”๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜

์ƒ์ง„๋‹จ์ด๋ฐ˜๋“œ์‹œํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ํŠนํžˆ๊ณจ ๋„์ธก์ •๊ณผ์ฒ™์ถ”๊ณจ์ ˆ

์„๋™์‹œ์—ํ‰๊ฐ€ํ• ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋Š”DXA๋ฅผ์ด์šฉํ•˜๋Š”VFA (vertebral

fracture assessment)์˜ ์ด์šฉ์ด ๋ณด๋‹ค ํ™œ์„ฑํ™” ๋˜์–ด์•ผ ํ•œ๋‹ค.

ํ•œํŽธ ์—ฌ๋Ÿฌ ์ด์œ ๋กœ ์ดฌ ํ•œ ๊ฐ์ข… ์ƒ์ง„๋‹จ๋ฒ•์—์„œ ๊ด€์ฐฐํ•  ์ˆ˜

์žˆ๋Š” ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์˜ ์†Œ๊ฒฌ์— ์ต์ˆ™ํ•  ํ•„์š”๊ฐ€ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ๋‹จ์ˆœ๋ฐฉ์‚ฌ์„ 

์ƒ์—์„œ ๊ณจํก์ˆ˜์— ์˜ํ•œ ๊ณจ์Œ ์˜ ๊ฐ์†Œ, ๊ณจ์†Œ์ฃผ์˜ ๋ณ€ํ™”, ๊ณจ

์ ˆ ๋“ฑ์ด ๋Œ€ํ‘œ์ ์ธ ์†Œ๊ฒฌ์ด๊ณ  ํ‰์ถ” ๋ฐ ์š”์ถ”, ๋Œ€ํ‡ด๊ณจ ๊ทผ์œ„๋ถ€์—

์„œ์ž˜๊ด€์ฐฐํ• ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋‹ค. ์•ž์œผ๋กœ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜์ง„๋‹จ์—๋Š”

๋ผˆ์Šค์บ”, SPECT/CT, CT, MRI๊ฐ€ ์ƒํ˜ธ๋ณด์™„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋  ๊ฒƒ

์ด๊ณ , ๊ณ ํ•ด์ƒ๋„์˜ ์ƒ์ดํ™œ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ฒŒ์ ์šฉ๋ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค(20, 21).

์ฐธ๊ณ ๋ฌธํ—Œ

11. Saville PD. A quantitative approach to simple radiographicdiagnosis of osteoporosis: Its application to the osteoporosisof rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1967; 10: 416-422.

12. Rogers LF, Lenchik L. Metabolic, endocrine, and related bonedisease. Juhl JH, Crummy AB, Kuhlman JE. Essentials ofradio -logic imaging. 7th ed. Lippincot -Raven, 1998:199 -236.

13. Yang SO, Choi MY. Diagnositic imaging features of osteopo-rosis. Kor J Osteoporosis 2004; 2: 1- 8.

14. Cook GJ, Hannaford E, See M, Clarke SE, Fogelman I. Thevalue of bone scintigraphy in the evaluation of osteoporoticpatients with back pain. Scand J Rheumatol 2002; 31: 245 -248.

15. Schousboe JT, DeBold CR, Bowles C, Glickstein S, RubinoRK. Prevalence of vertebral compression fracture deformity byX-ray absorptiometry of lateral thoracic and lumbar spines in apopulation referred for bone densitometry. J Clin Densitom2002; 5: 239- 246.

16. Mayo-Smith W, Rosenthal DI. Radiographic appearance ofosteopenia. Radiol Clin North Am 1991; 29: 37- 47.

17. Genant HK, Wu CY, van Kuijk C, Nevitt MC. Vertebral fractureassessment using a semiquantitative technique. J Bone Mi-neral Res 1993; 8: 1137-1148.

18. Yang SO. Clinical use of dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry. JKorean Bon Miner Metabolism 1996; 3: 128 -135.

19. Schousboe JT, Vokes T, Broy SB, Ferrar L, McKiernan F, RouxC, Binkly N. Vertebral fracture assessment: The ISCD officialpositions. J Clin Densitom 2008; 11: 92-108.

10. Haller J, Andrรฉ MP, Resnick D, Miller C, Howard BA, Mitchell

Yang SOยทKim SJยทJuhng SK

67_75์˜ํ•™๊ฐ•์ขŒ_์–‘์Šน์˜ค 2010.1.12 6:42 PM ํŽ˜์ด์ง€74 NO.3 InPut

Page 9: Imaging Diagnosis of Osteoporotic Fracture

๋Œ€ํ•œ์˜์‚ฌํ˜‘ํšŒ์ง€ 75

MJ, Schils JP, Sartoris DJ, Trudell D. Detection of thora-columbar vertebral body destruction with lateral spine radio-graphy. Part II. Clinical investigation with computed tomo-graphy. Invest Radiol 1990; 25: 523-532.

11. Kim JI, Yang SO, Choi JC. MRI findings of vertebral com-pression fractures. J Korean Radiol Soc 1995; 33: 667- 672.

12. Cuรฉnod CA, Laredo JD, Chevret S, Hamze B, Naouri JF,Chapaux X, Bondeville JM, Tubiana JM. Acute vertebralcollapse due to osteoporosis or malignancy: appearance onunenhanced and gadolinium-enhanced MR images. Radiology1996; 199: 541- 549.

13. Baur A, Stabler A, Arbogast S, Duerr HR, Bartl R, Reiser M.Acute osteoporotic and neoplastic vertebral compressionfractures: fluid sign at MR imaging. Radiology 2002; 225: 730 -735.

14. Yamato M, Nishimura G, Kuramochi E, Saiki N, Fujioka M. MRappearance at different ages of osteoporotic compressionfracture of the vertebrae. Radiat Med 1998; 16: 329 - 334.

15. Kong JH, Park JS, Ryu KN. Osteoporotic compression fractureof the thoracolumbar spine and sacral insufficiency fracture:

incidence and analysis of the relationship according to theclinical factors. J Korean Radiol Soc 2006; 55: 495- 500.

16. McAfee JG. Radionuclide imaging in metabolic and systemicskeletal disease. Semin Nucl Med 1987; 17: 334 - 349.

17. Karchevsky M, Babb JS, Schweitzer ME. Can diffusion-weighted imaging be used to differentiate benign frompathologic fractures? A meta-analysis. Skeletal Radiol 2008;37: 791-795.

18. Favus MJ. Primer on the metabolic bone diseases and dis-orders of mineral metabolism. 3rd ed. Philadelphia: Lippincott-Raven, 1996: 152-163.

19. Dass B, Puet TA, Watanakunakorn C. Tuberculosis of thespine (Pottโ€™s disease) presenting as โ€˜compression fracturesโ€™.Spinal Cord 2002; 40: 604- 608.

20. Osteoporosis. Korean Soc of Bone and Mineral Metabolism.Hanmi Publishing Company, 2006: 134-147.

21. Kalpakcioglu BB, Morshed S, Engelke K, Genant HK. Ad-vanced imaging of bone macrostructure and microstructure inbone fragility and fracture repair. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2008;90: 68 -78.

์˜ํ•™๊ฐ•์ขŒImaging Diagnosis of Osteoporotic Fracture

Peer Reviewersโ€™ Commentary

๋ณธ ๋…ผ๋ฌธ์€ ๋…ธ์ธ ์ธ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ฆ๊ฐ€๋กœ ์ธํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ ์ค‘์š”์„ฑ์ด ๊ฐ•์กฐ๋˜๋Š” ์‹œ์ ์—์„œ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ ์ƒ์ง„๋‹จ์€์‹œ๊ธฐ ์ ์ ˆํ•œ ์ฃผ์ œ๋กœ ์ƒ๊ฐ๋˜๋ฉฐ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ ์ƒ ์ง„๋‹จ์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ƒ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ์„œ ์ง„๋‹จํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ํŠน์ง•์ ์ธ ์†Œ๊ฒฌ๋“ค๊ณผ ์ •๋Ÿ‰์ ์ธ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ์™€ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ ๊ณจ์ ˆ๊ณผ ๊ฐ๋ณ„ํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ์งˆํ™˜์— ๋Œ€ํ•˜์—ฌ ์—ด๊ฑฐํ•˜๊ณ  ์†Œ๊ฒฌ์„ ์ ์ ˆํžˆ ๊ณ ์ฐฐํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ๋‚ด์šฉ์€ ์ž„์ƒ์˜๋“ค์—๊ฒŒ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ์„ฑ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์ด ์˜์‹ฌ์ด ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ๊ฒ€์‚ฌํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•๋“ค์„ ์•Œ๋ ค์ฃผ๊ณ  ๊ฐ๋ณ„์ง„๋‹จ์— ํฌํ•จํ•˜๋Š”์งˆํ™˜์—๋Œ€ํ•œ๊ณ ๋ ค๋ฅผํ• ์ˆ˜์žˆ๋„๋กํ•˜๋Š”๋…ผ๋ฌธ์ด๋‹ค.

[์ •๋ฆฌ:ํŽธ์ง‘์œ„์›ํšŒ]

67_75์˜ํ•™๊ฐ•์ขŒ_์–‘์Šน์˜ค 2010.1.12 6:42 PM ํŽ˜์ด์ง€75 NO.3 InPut


Recommended