8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
1/39
Pete GrahamSAP Business Suite Solution Management
John Steele, Sr. ManagerDeloitte Consulting LLP
Norm WhiteSAP Consulting
June 22, 2010
SAP EcoHub on IFRSLeveraging the New GL for Dual-Reportingand IFRS
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
2/39
Legal Disclaimer
The information in this presentation is confidential and proprietary to SAP and may not be disclosed withoutthe permission of SAP. This presentation is not subject to your license agreement or any other service orsubscription agreement with SAP. SAP has no obligation to pursue any course of business outlined in thisdocument or any related presentation, or to develop or release any functionality mentioned therein. Thisdocument, or any related presentation and SAP's strategy and possible future developments, products and orplatforms directions and functionality are all subject to change and may be changed by SAP at any time forany reason without notice. The information on this document is not a commitment, promise or legal obligationto deliver any material, code or functionality. This document is provided without a warranty of any kind, either
express or implied, including but not limited to, the implied warranties of merchantability, fitness for a particularpurpose, or non-infringement. This document is for informational purposes and may not be incorporated into acontract. SAP assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in this document, except if such damageswere caused by SAP intentionally or grossly negligent.
All forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results todiffer materially from expectations. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of their dates, and they should not be relied upon in making
purchasing decisions.
SAP 2010 / Page 2
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
3/39
About DeloitteDeloitte refers to one or more of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu, a Swiss Verein, and its network of member firms, each of which is alegally separate and independent entity. Please see www.deloitte.com/about for a detailed description of the legal structure of DeloitteTouche Tohmatsu and its member firms. Please see www.deloitte.com/us/about for a detailed description of the legal structure ofDeloitte LLP and its subsidiaries.
Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.Member of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu
This presentation contains general information only and Deloitte is not, by means of this presentation,rendering accounting, business, financial, investment, legal, tax, or other professional advice or services.This presentation is not a substitute for such professional advice or services, nor should it be used as abasis for any decision or action that may affect your business. Before making any decision or taking anyaction that may affect your business, you should consult a qualified professional advisor.
Deloitte, its affiliates, and related entities shall not be responsible for any loss sustained by any personwho relies on this presentation.
SAP 2010 / Page 3
http://www.deloitte.com/abouthttp://www.deloitte.com/us/abouthttp://www.deloitte.com/us/abouthttp://www.deloitte.com/about8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
4/39
Agenda
Speaker Introductions
IFRS / Convergence Update
Solutions for IFRS / Convergence
SAP General Ledger (New GL) Update
Building the Business Case
Wrap-Up / Q&A
SAP 2010 / Page 4
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
5/39
Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
The global move towards IFRS (listed companies)
Europe2005
Australia2005
Canada2009* 11
China2007
Brazil2010
India2011
Chile
2009
Japan
2010*/15?
South Africa2005
Adopted or will adopt
Developing plans to adopt
No plans or unknown
Mexico2012
United States2015 16?
* Early adopters
SAP 2010 / Page 5
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
6/39
Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
United States
Shift to IFRS is highly likely, though not imminent Company efforts have been slowly building sense the release of this workplan SECs Statement on Convergence and Global Accounting Standards issued in
February 2010 Strong commitment to a single set of high-quality global standards
IFRS is best positioned Support for convergence by end of 2011 Directed Staff to carry out a Work Plan
Evaluate the impact of IFRS, support a decision on an IFRS mandate in 2011 Consistent with timing outlined in proposed IFRS roadmap Timeline for conversion noted by the SEC is no earlier than 2015/2016 (thereby
reflecting a January 1, 2013/2014 transition date) Directs the staff to carry out a Work Plan that sets forth specific areas and factors for
consideration before potentially transitioning to IFRS Also directs the staff to provide public progress reports to the Commission beginning
in October 2010 and continuing until the work is complete
Regulatory updates on use of IFRS
SAP 2010 / Page 6
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
7/39Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
Global statutory environment
Foreign territories are permitting or requiring IFRS for statutory financialreporting
Creates a near-term compliance challenge Creating potential opportunities for Companies to streamline and standardize
statutory reporting policies and procedures
Lower compliance costs by taking advantage of shared service centers Countries requiring IFRS-based statutory financial reports (e.g. Australia, South Africa,
Hong Kong, Singapore, Philippines) Countries that have recently announced proposals to move to IFRS in the near future
(e.g. UK, Ireland, Brazil) Others countries provide companies with the option to use IFRS or are converging local
GAAP standards and IFRS standards
Regulatory updates on use of IFRS (cont.)
SAP 2010 / Page 7
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
8/39Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
Overview of current FASB/IASB convergence efforts
Overview of convergence efforts
IASB and FASB have again reaffirmed their Memorandum of Understanding (MOU) on convergingU.S. GAAP and IFRS Efforts were initially geared toward a June 30, 2011 timeline; however on June 2, 2010 the IASB
and FASB issued a joint statement indicating that the target completion dates for a few projectshave extended into the second half of 2011
Effective dates not expected before January 1, 2013, although early adoption likely to be allowed As U.S. GAAP converges, some differences may need to be addressed prior to the U.S.
mandating IFRS SEC statement reinforces support for the ongoing convergence activities of the FASB and IASB SEC statement emphasizes completion of current initiatives by end of 2011
Convergenceconsiderations
Convergence does not necessarily result in identical standards; focusis on converging general principles, not every detail
Ongoing convergence is limited to a defined group of projects Several of the most time consuming areas of IFRS conversion deal
with areas not subject to convergence Convergence will not result in a transition to IFRS by U.S. issuers in
and of itself
SAP 2010 / Page 8
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
9/39Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
Accounting Topic 2009 2010 2011
Memorandum of Understanding
Convergence Projects
Income Taxes Exposure Draft Final Standard
Leases Discussion Paper Exposure Draft Final Standard
Financial statement presentation Exposure Draft Final Standard
Provisions Exposure Draft (2)
Final Standard
Post-employment benefits (including pensions) Exposure Draft (2) Final Standard
Revenue recognition Exposure Draft Final Standard
Financial instruments w/ characteristics of equity Exposure Draft Final Standard
Financial Crisis Convergence
Projects
Consolidation Final Standard
Financial instruments derecognition Exposure Draft Final Standard Final Standard
Fair value measurement Exposure Draft Final Standard Financial instruments (classification andmeasurement)
Exposure Draft (All)
Final Standard (Assets)
Exposure Draft (Liab)
Final Standard (Liab)
Financial instruments impairment Exposure Draft Final Standard
Financial instruments hedge accounting Exposure Draft Final Standard
(1) Convergence status and estimated dates as of May 5, 2010 per International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) website | (2) ED has been issued
Overview of selected convergence projects(1)
SAP 2010 / Page 9
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
10/39Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
IFRS in the U.S. Revised SEC timeline*
regulatory timeline
* Note that the expected date of IFRS adoption is based on the February 24, 2010 SEC Statement in Support of Convergenceand Global Accounting Standards.
2011: SEC todecide
whether tomandate IFRS
January 1,2013:
Beginning ofthe first
comparativeIFRS year
December 31,2015: Largeaccelerated
filers could bemandated to
report financialresults using
IFRS
2010:Expectedrelease of
revised IFRSroadmap andSEC workplan
Dual reporting period (U.S. GAAP & IFRS)
U.S. GAAP financial statements (through third-quarter 2015)
transition date
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
IFRS financial statements
reporting date
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
11/39Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
At what organizational level should system changes bemade?Organizational level Description Considerations
Group Individual entities in eachcountry prepare localfinancial statements whichare then consolidated andconverted at the grouplevel to IFRS
Positive:Suitable when individual entities do not have to reportunder IFRS and only a few simple adjustments arerequiredNegative:There will be no ability to drill down into IFRScompliant numbers (i.e., entities below this level wouldnot produce IFRS financials)
Company Individual entities in eachcountry prepare localfinancial statements whichare converted to IFRSstandards beforeconsolidating at the grouplevel
Positive:Suitable when individual entities are required to reportunder IFRS and/or there are complex group structuresand/or a large number of consolidated entitiesGroundwork laid for consolidated adoptionCost savings/efficiencies in statutory reportingNegative:U.S. GAAP and IFRS are evolving backend cost
may be greaterSource Changes in source systems
enable IFRS accountingand reporting at the source
Suitable when :Daily financial statements are requiredComplex IFRS calculation occur at the sourceChanges at the source are required to capture newdata
SAP 2010 / Page 11
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
12/39Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
IFRSAssessment
Analyze impacts of IFRS on financials, systems, processesand organization broadly Determine high-effort and long lead-time items Support dialog within (and outside) the organization
Convergence
Assess impacts of converged standards
Potentially comment on exposure drafts Prepare for adoption of U.S. GAAP changes
StatutoryReporting
Understand statutory reporting landscape Plan for countries converging or converting in near term Begin to centrally manage global reporting requirements
Systemconsiderations
Identify key impacts of IFRS on systems projects Design decisions should give consideration to IFRS Determine whether or not to build in IFRS elements
What are companies currently doing to plan for IFRS?
and monitoring SEC progress on its Work Plan
SAP 2010 / Page 12
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
13/39Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
Current SEC reporting requirements mandate three years of audited US GAAP
financial statements for public issuers See Rule 3-02(a) of Regulation S-X [17 CFR 210.3-02(a)]
IFRS Roadmap continues this requirement by setting forth a requirement for threeyears of IFRS financial statements
Assumes that the audit requirement stays in place
Creates a requirement for Dual or Parallel accounting and financial reporting To illustrate, if IFRS is required per the Roadmap for the years ending on or after
December 15th, 2015, a calendar year company would report for the year endingDecember 31st, 2015 using IFRS for the years ending December 31st, 2013, 2014, and2015.
SEC Roadmap Requirement for Dual Reporting
SAP 2010 / Page 13
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
14/39Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
IFRS in the U.S. Dual Reporting timeline*
regulatory timeline
* Note that the expected date of IFRS adoption is based on the February 24, 2010 SEC Statement in Support of Convergenceand Global Accounting Standards.
2011: SEC todecide
whether tomandate IFRS
January 1,2013:
Beginning ofthe first
comparativeIFRS year
December 31,2015: Largeaccelerated
filers could bemandated to
report financialresults using
IFRS
2010:Expectedrelease of
revised IFRSroadmap andSEC workplan
Dual reporting period (U.S. GAAP & IFRS)
U.S. GAAP financial statements (through third-quarter 2015)
transition date
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015
IFRS financial statements
reporting date
SAP 2010 / Page 14
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
15/39Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
Options for Parallel/Dual Reporting
There are two options Real Time and Retrospective
Real Time parallel SAP and other systems will have to support the ability to produceUS GAAP and IFRS statements simultaneously at the transaction level
This will require re-engineering SAP and feeder systems
Parallel valuation functionality or account mapping will be important to support the effort
Requires early adoption of IFRS (functionally going live at start of parallel)
Retrospective parallel SAP and other systems will not have to support IFRS at thetransaction level until live date (12/31/15)
Simplifies parallel reporting, but could create significant challenges offline inExcel/consolidation tools
SAP 2010 / Page 15
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
16/39
Agenda
Speaker Introductions
IFRS / Convergence Update
Solutions for IFRS / Convergence
SAP General Ledger (New GL) Update
Building the Business Case
Wrap-Up / Q&A
SAP 2010 / Page 16
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
17/39
SAP Solutions for IFRS
SAP offers the most complete IFRS solution, addressing all facetsIFRS is more than an accounting issue - it impacts people, processes, and technology
SAP provides a single technology stack with support for all major architecturesA smooth phased transition to IFRS must leverage technology as an enabler
SAP provides market leading, integrated ledger and consolidation applicationsImpacted systems include financial consolidation and reporting applications,general ledger, and sub-ledgers
Proven install base of customers already reporting according to IFRS1,500+ financial consolidation and reporting implementations4,000+ general ledger implementations (includes 100+ US GAAP to IFRS conversions)
Agile solutions and content offer quickest wins for customers adopting IFRS
Phased Transition to IFRSFinancial Consolidation and ReportingGeneral LedgerSub-ledgers
Technology
People
Process SAP 2010 / Page 17
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://www.terrapinlogo.com/images/tick-tock%20clock.JPG&imgrefurl=http://www.terrapinlogo.com/newsletters/vol2_no2.htm&usg=__k1-rFbU7Kflx_AEP98RXselVVXI=&h=399&w=451&sz=23&hl=en&start=4&tbnid=NKQ8EQDuBYYM3M:&tbnh=112&tbnw=127&prev=/images?q=clock+ticking&gbv=2&hl=en8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
18/39
SAP and IFRS Compliance Solutions andServices
Standard SAP applications, SAP services, and our partners canprovide the necessary support for your IFRS project
Local close/transaction SAP ERP layerSAP General Ledger ERP 6.0 Financials GL Parallel Account with multi-ledgersAsset Accounting Multi-Asset Valuation Areas
SAP Financial Closing cockpit (FCc)SAP Central Process Scheduling (CPS) by RedwoodUpgrade/migration to ERP 6.0 Financials GLOlder versions of ERP IFRS-specific configurations
Group Close/Reporting/Consolidation LayerSAP BusinessObjects Financial Consolidation (incl. IFRS starter kit)SAP BusinessObjects Planning and Consolidation (incl. IFRS starter kit)SAP BusinessObjects Financial Information ManagementSAP BusinessObjects XBRL Publishing by UBmatrixSAP BusinessObjects Process ControlSAP BusinessObjects Intercompany
SAP 2010 / Page 18
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
19/39
Approaches to IFRS Transition in the SAP ERPFinancials Solution
Approach Classic General Ledger New General Ledger
Account-Based
Parallel Ledger
Current recommended configuration approaches for multi-GAAP valuation
SAP 2010 / Page 19
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
20/39
Agenda
Speaker Introductions
IFRS / Conversion Update
Solutions for IFRS / Convergence
SAP General Ledger (New GL) Update
Building the Business Case
Wrap-Up / Q&A
SAP 2010 / Page 20
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
21/39
Updates for EHP 5 New GL
For New GL planned innovations include: Profit Center Reorganization, SegmentReporting, Impairment of Assets (IAS 36), and additional Formatted Reporting forthe General Ledger
For Enhanced Multi-GAAP support, planned innovations include: Parallel Cost ofGoods Manufactured (COGM) , Parallel WIP and Results Analysis, AllocateFIFO/LIFO to different accounting principles
For ERP and POA: planned innovations include better interaction between PCM andCO-PA & New G/L and POA.
For FCc and CPS, planned innovations include improved monitoring
SAP 2010 / Page 21
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
22/39
Concept of Ledgers Leading and Parallel
SAP 2010 / Page 22
SAP provides the leading ledger and a summary table with the standardsystem There is a new standard field segment in SAP ERP 6.0
There is exactly one leading ledger and is activated at the client level
Only the values of the leading ledger are posted to CO
The leading ledger gets many of its control parameters from thecompany code
The non-leading ledgers can be assigned alternative currencies and/or
fiscal year variants that differ from the leading ledger.
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
23/39
Pros and Cons of Parallel Reporting Solutions-- Parallel Accounts
SAP 2010 / Page 23
Ease of use and relatively simplesetup
Retained earnings account andbalance carry forward separateretained earnings account foreach accounting principle ismaintained
Parallel postings in the specificaccount areas
High increase in the number ofgeneral ledger accounts addingcomplexity to the chart ofaccounts
Difficult to report on differentfiscal years
Postings may cross valuations for example, users maymistakenly post local GAAP to
U.S. GAAP general ledgeraccounts. (Note: A validation isoften created to ensure thatcross-valuation postings do notoccur
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
24/39
Pros and Cons of Parallel Reporting Solutions-- Parallel Ledgers
SAP 2010 / Page 24
Fewer general ledger accounts
Separation of ledgers givesseparate transparency (e.g. forauditors)
Can maintain a separate ledgerfor each accounting principle
Different fiscal year variants canbe used for ledgers
Different posting control variantscan be used for ledgers
Data volume may increasesignificantly as parallel ledgersare updates simultaneously withall postings to the leadingledger.
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
25/39
Migration Scenarios
SAP 2010 / Page 25
What is it
Migration Scenarios
Lessons Learned
Recommendation from SAP
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
26/39
Migration Scenarios What is it
SAP 2010 / Page 26
The General Ledger in SAP ERP (new G/L) encompasses some of themost important and exciting new functionality to become available in theSAP ERP Financials application in recent years
It is the migration from classic to new G/L or the subsequentimplementation of further functionality
The new G/L implementation project starts with the definition of a newG/L concept
The SAP General Ledger Migration service is offers migration packages
ranging from the straight merging of financial ledgers to more complexmigration projects that take into account aspects such as documentsplitting and parallel accounting
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
27/39
Migration Scenarios from Classic to New GLand Further Functionality
SAP 2010 / Page 27
Scenario 1: Merge of FI ledger
Scenario 2: Merge of FI, PCA and SL ledgersScenario 3: Scenario 2 + Document Splitting (for Profit Center, Segment &Business Area reporting)
Scenario 4: Scenario 2 + Change from account solution for ledger solution forparallel accounting
Scenario 5: Scenario 3 + Change from account solution for ledger solution forparallel accounting
Scenario 6: Subsequent implementation of document splittingNew general ledger has been activated without document splitting andnow it has to be implemented for one or more company codes
Scenario 7: Subsequent implementation of a further ledger
Extend an existing new G/L by a further non-leading ledger
Scenario 8: Subsequent change from account solution to ledger solution
Implementation of ledger solution in new G/L for parallel accounting andreplacement of existing account solution
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
28/39
Migration Scenarios Lessons Learned
SAP 2010 / Page 28
Complete the upgrade to ERP first, then plan on G/L Migration
The Migration project also includes G/L configuration
Expect to spend extra time prior to migration in cleaning up the data to bemigrated
Migration does not fix existing configuration issues, it only moves datafrom one data table to another
Duration of migration depends on different factors, such as
Number of documents to be migratedMigration scenarioDatabase systemEtc
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
29/39
Agenda
Speaker Introductions
IFRS / Conversion Update
Solutions for IFRS / Convergence
SAP General Ledger (New GL) Update
Building the Business Case
Wrap-Up / Q&A
SAP 2010 / Page 29
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
30/39
Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
Practical lessons learned during IFRS Assessments
Selectedsuccess factors Observations and insights
Disciplined projectmanagementshould be appliedto accountingpolicy selection
Companies need to select the right project sponsor one who has the breadth and depthof experience to understand the broad implications of the proposed accounting changes (e.g.,system, process, tax and organizational implications)
Downstream process and system analyses are frequently dependent on accounting policyselection; if project management discipline is not applied to the process of evaluatingaccounting policy options, the ultimate conversion project could stall
Consider U.S.
GAAP convergence
IFRS is driving significant changes to U.S. GAAP through the convergence agenda , in
some cases on a more accelerated timelineCommittedresources andestablished vision
Internal resources required are often not consistently available , to participate in keydecisions and achieve knowledge transfer
Companies tend to underestimate resource needs , total cost, and time requirements Failure to achieve durable consensus within senior executive group on program
objectives and priority
Clearly defined andcommunicatedsystemrequirements
Gaps typically exist between documentation of accounting conclusions and theinformation Finance Technology needs to evaluate, plan for and budget system needs
Limited experience with managing this type of communication is often found in manyorganizations
Granularimplementationplanning
Implementation roadmaps often are not sufficiently detailed from a process and a systemstandpoint to be actionable and to identify key resource requirements and interdependencies
this lack of detail can result in inefficiencies and rework
SAP 2010 / Page 30
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
31/39
Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
IFRS is not the only driver for transitioning to the SAP General Ledger.
Companies who have migrated have enjoyed additional benefits.
Building the Business Case for New GL
Functionality /Feature Application Observations and insights
Unified Structure Cross Functional (GL, CO,Profit Center Reporting)
Allows simplification of structure of financial reportinginfrastructure
e.g. eliminate CO reconciliation and COGS ledger Creates one version of the truth
Allows faster month end close Greater traceability and auditing of results
Extensibility Customer Specific Fields Extremely valuable for industry specific requirements
Segment Reporting Reporting required by SFAS131 and IAS14
Creates robust solution for Segment Reporting
Document Splitting
and Profit CenterReporting
Full Balance Sheet by Profit
Center or other dimension
Provides enhanced management reporting at profit center
or other management unit Significant enhancement over functionality in earlier
releases May eliminate FRICE-W / user exits in earlier releases
Parallel Ledgers Statutory Reporting (could beIFRS in certain countries)
The simplification and standardization of statutory reportingis a significant benefit seen by customers
Provide flexibility for local and group close
SAP 2010 / Page 31
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
32/39
Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
Closing thoughts on the Business Case for New GL IFRS has provided a catalyst for companies to examine their underlying financial system
infrastructure Many have found the New GL functionality compelling after a close examination
A New GL Migration could be a core component of a strategic roadmap Allows implementation of functionality that benefits the business (e.g. PCs) and the
core finance function (faster closing) Sets a firm foundation for IFRS (parallel ledgers)
Understanding IFRS and the New GL functionality should allow a business case to bebuilt.
Building the Business Case for New GL (Cont.)
Functionality /Feature Application Observations and insights
Additional StandardReporting
Provide additional reportingcapabilities to end users
Multi-dimensional and Drilldown analysis BW Remote reporting slide and dice for all dimensions Pre-defined reports delivered as standard SAP content
Foreign CurrencyValuation
Posting FC Valuation toadditional dimensions
Additional dimensionality in foreign currency reportingallows flexibility for customers
EHPs General usability and features Significant enhancements have been put in place in EHPs1-4
EHPs cannot be applied unless already on the New GL
SAP 2010 / Page 32
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
33/39
Agenda
Speaker Introductions
IFRS / Conversion Update
Solutions for IFRS / Convergence
SAP General Ledger (New GL) Update
Building the Business Case
Wrap-Up / Q&A
SAP 2010 / Page 33
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
34/39
Additional Resources
Check out SAP IFRS Resource CenterWhite papersWebcastsDemos
Join the Business Process Expert (BPX) Community for IFRS :IFRS on SAP knowledge from SAP community
Blogs and Forums to discuss issuesContribute to IFRS wiki on SAP Ideas, Best Practices, Tips and Tricks
Listen to the IFRS Webinars and Other Resources from SAP Ecohubhttp://ecohub.sdn.sap.com/irj/ecohub/ifrs
SAP 2010 / Page 34
http://bit.ly/d32kL3http://bit.ly/a4PUuohttps://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/IFRS/IFRS+on+SAP+-+Best+Practiceshttp://ecohub.sdn.sap.com/irj/ecohub/ifrshttp://ecohub.sdn.sap.com/irj/ecohub/ifrshttps://wiki.sdn.sap.com/wiki/display/IFRS/IFRS+on+SAP+-+Best+Practiceshttp://bit.ly/a4PUuohttp://bit.ly/d32kL38/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
35/39
IFRS on SAP Community:sdn.sap.com/irj/bpx/ifrs
Get your questionsanswered on theIFRS Forum
at https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/forum?foru
mID=400
Have an idea?
Write a blog
SAP 2010 / Page 35
https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/bpx/ifrshttps://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/forum?forumID=400https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/forum?forumID=400https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/forum?forumID=400https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/forum?forumID=400https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/forum?forumID=400https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/scn/forum?forumID=400https://www.sdn.sap.com/irj/bpx/ifrs8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
36/39
Thank you!
SAP 2010 / Page 36
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
37/39
Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved.
Contact information
Norm WhiteSenior ConsultantSAP Consulting
SAP
Pete GrahamDirector Solution Management
SAP Labs LLC
SAP 2010 / Page 37
John E. Steele Jr.Senior Manager
Deloitte Consulting LLP
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
38/39
Copyright 2010 Deloitte Development LLC. All rights reserved. SAP 2010 / Page 38
C i h 2010 SAP AG
8/7/2019 ifrs_webinar_june_22_2010_v7
39/39
Copyright 2010 SAP AGAll Rights Reserved
No part of this publication may be reproduced or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without the express permission of SAP AG. The information contained herein may be changed without prior notice.Some software products marketed by SAP AG and its distributors contain proprietary software components of other software vendors.SAP, R/3, xApps, xApp, SAP NetWeaver, Duet, SAP Business ByDesign, ByDesign, PartnerEdge and other SAP products and services mentioned herein as well as their respective logos are trademarks or registered trademarks of SAP AG in Germanyand in several other countries all over the world. All other product and service names mentioned and associated logos display ed are the trademarks of their respective companies. Data contained in this document serves informational purposes only.National product specifications may vary.The information in this document is proprietary to SAP. No part of this document may be reproduced, copied, or transmitted in any form or for any purpose without the express prior written permission of SAP AG. This document is a preliminary versionand not subject to your license agreement or any other agreement with SAP. This document contains only intended strategies, developments, and functionalities of the SAP product and is not intended to be binding upon SAP to any particular course ofbusiness, product strategy, and/or development. Please note that this document is subject to change and may be changed by SAP at any time without notice. SAP assumes no responsibility for errors or omissions in this document. SAP does not warrantthe accuracy or completeness of the information, text, graphics, links, or other items contained within this material. This d ocument is provided without a warranty of any kind, either express or implied, including but not limited to the implied warranties ofmerchantability, fitness for a particular purpose, or non-infringement.SAP shall have no liability for damages of any kind including without limitation direct, special, indirect, or consequential damages that may result from the use of these materials. This limitation shall not apply in cases of intent or gross negligence.The statutory liability for personal injury and defective products is not affected. SAP has no control over the information that you may access through the use of hot links contained in these materials and does not endorse your use of third -party Webpages nor provide any warranty whatsoever relating to third-party Web pages.
Weitergabe und Vervielfltigung dieser Publikation oder von Teilen daraus sind, zu welchem Zweck und in welcher Form auch immer, ohne die ausdrckliche schriftliche Genehmigung durch SAP AG nicht gestattet. In dieser Publikation enthalteneInformationen knnen ohne vorherige Ankndigung gendert werden.Einige von der SAP AG und deren Vertriebspartnern vertriebene Softwareprodukte knnen Softwarekomponenten umfassen, die Eigentum anderer Softwarehersteller sind.SAP, R/3, xApps, xApp, SAP NetWeaver, Duet, SAP Business ByDesign, ByDesign, PartnerEdge und andere in diesem Dokument erwhnte SAP-Produkte und Services sowie die dazugehrigen Logos sind Marken oder eingetragene Marken der SAPAG in Deutschland und in mehreren anderen Lndern weltweit. Alle anderen in diesem Dokument erwhnten Namen von Produkten und Services sowie die damit verbundenen Firmenlogos sind Marken der jeweiligen Unternehmen. Die Angaben imText sind unverbindlich und dienen lediglich zu Informationszwecken. Produkte knnen lnderspezifische Unterschiede aufweisen.Die in dieser Publikation enthaltene Information ist Eigentum der SAP. Weitergabe und Vervielfltigung dieser Publikation oder von Teilen daraus sind, zu welchem Zweck und in welcher Form auch immer, nur mit ausdrcklicher schriftlicherGenehmigung durch SAP AG gestattet. Bei dieser Publikation handelt es sich um eine vorlufige Version, die nicht Ihrem gltigen Lizenzvertrag oder anderen Vereinbarungen mit SAP unterliegt. Diese Publikation enthlt nur vorgesehene Strategien,Entwicklungen und Funktionen des SAP-Produkts. SAP entsteht aus dieser Publikation keine Verpflichtung zu einer bestimmten Gesc hfts- oder Produktstrategie und/oder bestimmten Entwicklungen. Diese Publikation kann von SAP jederzeit ohne
vorherige Ankndigung gendert werden.SAP bernimmt keine Haftung fr Fehler oder Auslassungen in dieser Publikation. Des Weiteren bernimmt SAP keine Garantie fr die Exaktheit oder Vollstndigkeit der Informationen, Texte, Grafiken, Links und sonstigen in dieser Publikationenthaltenen Elementen. Diese Publikation wird ohne jegliche Gewhr, weder ausdrcklich noch stillschweigend, bereitgestellt. Dies gilt u. a., aber nicht ausschlielich, hinsichtlich der Gewhrleistung der Marktgngigkeit und der Eignung fr einenbestimmten Zweck sowie fr die Gewhrleistung der Nichtverletzung geltenden Rechts. SAP haftet nicht fr entstandene Schden. Dies gilt u. a. und uneingeschrnkt fr konkrete, besondere und mittelbare Schden oder Folgeschden, die aus derNutzung dieser Materialien entstehen knnen. Diese Einschrnkung gilt nicht bei Vorsatz oder grober Fahrlssigkeit.Die gesetzliche Haftung bei Personenschden oder Produkthaftung bleibt unberhrt. Die Informationen, auf die Sie mglicherweise ber die in diesem Material enthaltenen Hotlinks zugreifen, unterliegen nicht dem Einfluss von SAP, und SAP untersttztnicht die Nutzung von Internetseiten Dritter durch Sie und gibt keinerlei Gewhrleistungen oder Zusagen ber InternetseitenDritter ab.Alle Rechte vorbehalten.
Recommended