Bob SpencerBob SpencerAgriculture Program ManagerAgriculture Program Manager
(208) 332-8613(208) [email protected]@agri.state.id.us
Division of Agricultural Resources
Pesticide Complaint & InspectionTrends
0
100
200
300
400
500
600
700
Years
Num
ber o
f Cas
es
Complaints
Routine
Total
Canyon County Worker Exposure CaseCanyon County Worker Exposure Case
Grower called in the morning to have the labor Grower called in the morning to have the labor foreman and his crew weed his onion fieldforeman and his crew weed his onion fieldGrower called his fieldman to check his onions for Grower called his fieldman to check his onions for insects and diseasesinsects and diseasesGrower and fieldman decided onions needed Grower and fieldman decided onions needed spraying with Lannate + Mustang Max + Dithanespraying with Lannate + Mustang Max + DithaneFieldman delivered chemical to applicator and Fieldman delivered chemical to applicator and mapped out the fields to be sprayedmapped out the fields to be sprayedApplicator (office manager) told fieldman they Applicator (office manager) told fieldman they mightmight get to it that evening get to it that evening
July 5, 2005
Worker Exposure Case (cont.)Worker Exposure Case (cont.)
Workers showed up on the afternoon of July Workers showed up on the afternoon of July 55thth and weeded part of the onion field and weeded part of the onion field
Applicator started spraying the onion fields at Applicator started spraying the onion fields at 2358 hours on July 52358 hours on July 5thth and finished at 0130 and finished at 0130 hours on July 6hours on July 6thth..
Worker Exposure Case (cont.)Worker Exposure Case (cont.)
29 field workers entered the field at 0600 hours 29 field workers entered the field at 0600 hours and finished weeding the field at 1100 hoursand finished weeding the field at 1100 hours
Workers moved to a sugar beet field, became Workers moved to a sugar beet field, became nauseous, dizzy, vomiting, diarrhea, difficulty nauseous, dizzy, vomiting, diarrhea, difficulty breathingbreathing
Crew foremen called 911Crew foremen called 911
HazMat Response Team setup decontamination HazMat Response Team setup decontamination sitesite
Concerns during Emergency Medical Response
Privacy of individuals during decontamination
Communication with workers – only two EMRs spoke Spanish
Chain-of-Custody issues to collect clothing samples
Worker Exposure Case (cont.)Worker Exposure Case (cont.)
Several workers sent to hospital to be checked Several workers sent to hospital to be checked out, some were kept overnight, others were out, some were kept overnight, others were released and told not to go back to the fields for released and told not to go back to the fields for several daysseveral days
ISDA initiated investigation on July 6th ISDA initiated investigation on July 6th
ISDA attended public meeting with workersISDA attended public meeting with workers
Lots of media attention – locally & nationwide Lots of media attention – locally & nationwide
Worker Exposure Case (cont.)Worker Exposure Case (cont.)
Applicator Applicator failedfailed to notify the grower when to notify the grower when the field was going to be sprayedthe field was going to be sprayed
Grower was notified by applicator on the Grower was notified by applicator on the afternoon of July 6afternoon of July 6thth the field had been sprayed the field had been sprayed
Worker Exposure Case –Worker Exposure Case – Violations & PenaltiesViolations & Penalties
GrowerGrower– Failed to train his workersFailed to train his workers– Failed to maintain Central LocationFailed to maintain Central Location
3 counts of Use Inconsistent with the label 3 counts of Use Inconsistent with the label & WPS& WPS– $3,000 x 3 = $9,000 total civil penalty$3,000 x 3 = $9,000 total civil penalty– Paid penalty = $6,750Paid penalty = $6,750
Worker Exposure Case –Worker Exposure Case – Violations & PenaltiesViolations & Penalties
Labor ContractorLabor Contractor– Failed to train workersFailed to train workers– Failed to have decontamination site availableFailed to have decontamination site available
3 counts of Use Inconsistent with the label & 3 counts of Use Inconsistent with the label & WPSWPS– $3,000 x 3 = $9,000 total civil penalty$3,000 x 3 = $9,000 total civil penalty
Worker Exposure Case –Worker Exposure Case – Violations & PenaltiesViolations & Penalties
Applicator (second offense within past 3 years)Applicator (second offense within past 3 years)– Failed to provide Exchange of Information to growerFailed to provide Exchange of Information to grower
3 counts of Use Inconsistent with the label & WPS3 counts of Use Inconsistent with the label & WPS– $3,000 x 3 = $9,000 civil penalty$3,000 x 3 = $9,000 civil penalty
– 8 days license suspension x 3 = 24 days license suspension8 days license suspension x 3 = 24 days license suspension
1 count of Faulty, Careless & Negligence1 count of Faulty, Careless & Negligence– $3,000 x 1 = $3,000 civil penalty$3,000 x 1 = $3,000 civil penalty
– 8 days license suspension x 1 = 8 days license suspension8 days license suspension x 1 = 8 days license suspension
Total penaltyTotal penalty– $12, 000 + 20 consecutive days license suspension$12, 000 + 20 consecutive days license suspension
Worker Exposure Case –Worker Exposure Case – Violations & PenaltiesViolations & Penalties
Applicator CompanyApplicator Company– Failed to provide Exchange of Information to growerFailed to provide Exchange of Information to grower
– Employees cited previouslyEmployees cited previously
3 counts of Use Inconsistent with the label & WPS3 counts of Use Inconsistent with the label & WPS– $3,000 x 3 = $9,000 civil penalty$3,000 x 3 = $9,000 civil penalty
1 count of Faulty, Careless & Negligence1 count of Faulty, Careless & Negligence– $3,000 x 1 = $3,000 civil penalty$3,000 x 1 = $3,000 civil penalty
Total PenaltyTotal Penalty– $12,000$12,000
Worker Exposure Case – OtherWorker Exposure Case – Other
Referral to EPA to review Lannate labelReferral to EPA to review Lannate label– Posting only required for grapesPosting only required for grapes– Lack of interest for changing label from EPA & DuPontLack of interest for changing label from EPA & DuPont
EPA Criminal investigation was initiatedEPA Criminal investigation was initiated– Criminal case was droppedCriminal case was dropped
Pending lawsuit from workersPending lawsuit from workers– At least four workers still claiming adverse effectsAt least four workers still claiming adverse effects
Increased Insurance PremiumsIncreased Insurance PremiumsWorkman’s Compensation claimsWorkman’s Compensation claimsLocal and National media attentionLocal and National media attentionICAN proposed new RulesICAN proposed new Rules– Rule was held in committee March 2006Rule was held in committee March 2006– Legislative tour scheduled in July 2006Legislative tour scheduled in July 2006– Reintroduce revised legislation in 2007Reintroduce revised legislation in 2007
Bob SpencerBob Spencer
Division of Division of Agricultural Agricultural ResourcesResources
(208) 332-8613(208) [email protected]@agri.state.id.us
THANK YOU!
ANY QUESTIONS?