Transcript
Page 1: ICANN Contract vs National Law

ICANN Contract vs. National LawWith Michele Neylon

Page 2: ICANN Contract vs National Law

ICANN Contract vs. National Law

Michele Neylon

Page 3: ICANN Contract vs National Law

Who am I?

Michele Neylon- Founder / CEO Blacknight- http://mneylon.tel- @mneylon- http://michele.me/blog- IIA Net Visionary 2013- Chair RrsG, Chair Registrar

Advisory Board Eurid, member EWG

Page 4: ICANN Contract vs National Law

What Will I Cover?

• Registrars• EU law

• Registries• ICANN “law”

Page 5: ICANN Contract vs National Law
Page 6: ICANN Contract vs National Law

I am NOT a lawyer!

Page 7: ICANN Contract vs National Law

Head Hurts?

Page 8: ICANN Contract vs National Law
Page 9: ICANN Contract vs National Law
Page 10: ICANN Contract vs National Law
Page 11: ICANN Contract vs National Law

EU Registries vs ICANN (Historical)

• .tel – delayed due to whois policy • .cat – 3 years+ to get a whois policy change +

comply with Spanish law

Page 12: ICANN Contract vs National Law

Post Snowden World

Page 13: ICANN Contract vs National Law
Page 14: ICANN Contract vs National Law

Getting away with murder?

• EU citizens more conscious of data privacy + digital issues than before

• Logically the risk of litigation has increased• Irish DPC being sued for not being tough

enough on Facebook!• Registrars and registries at risk?• Is ICANN? Doubtful – they’re still safe in the

US!

Page 15: ICANN Contract vs National Law
Page 16: ICANN Contract vs National Law

EU Law vs ICANN?

Page 17: ICANN Contract vs National Law

2013 RAA

• Problematic for EU based registrars• Problematic for non-EU registrar with EU

registrants– Data retention– Data elements to be collected– Periods of retention

Page 18: ICANN Contract vs National Law
Page 19: ICANN Contract vs National Law

Article 29 Working Party

• 6th June letter to ICANN (http://michele.cat/ch )

• “..to avoid unnecessary duplication of work by 27 national data protection authorities in Europe.. the WP wishes to provide a single statement for all relevant registrars targeting individual domain name holders in Europe”

Page 20: ICANN Contract vs National Law

Article 29 Working Party

• 2013 RAA obligations NOT based on legal requirement in EU

• Risk of data breach -> exposure of personal data

• Opposes Private corporation (ICANN) introducing data retention -> national govt should do it (if needed)

Page 21: ICANN Contract vs National Law

What about Whois?

• Art 29 WP doesn’t like “open” whois• Most ccTLDs in EU “gate” data BUT ICANN

forces registrars AND registries to publish EVERYTHING by default

• What will “Geo” gTLDs do?

Page 22: ICANN Contract vs National Law
Page 23: ICANN Contract vs National Law

ICANN’s response?

• Waiver process for retention / collection elements of 2013 RAA (see http://michele.cat/cg )

• No change on Whois “waiver” process (yet)• Article 29 letter rejected

Page 24: ICANN Contract vs National Law
Page 25: ICANN Contract vs National Law

Impact on Registrars / Registries

• Delays• Cost (lawyers don’t work for free!)• ONLY registrars on 2013 RAA can offer new

TLDs• If a registrar doesn’t have a waiver then how

will their DPC react?• Is it worth the risk?

Page 26: ICANN Contract vs National Law

Waiver = how long?

• Advantage for registrars in countries with other registrars

• 45 days? 90 days?• Timeline published by ICANN has a 30 day

publication period

Page 27: ICANN Contract vs National Law
Page 28: ICANN Contract vs National Law

Our Experience (so far)

• Delay• Submitted request on September 17th • Received basic acknowledgement same day• Received a reply on October 25th with queries

Page 29: ICANN Contract vs National Law

The Future?

• GAC involvement?• Article 29 WP again?• EU Commission?• ICANN?

Page 30: ICANN Contract vs National Law

Questions?

Page 31: ICANN Contract vs National Law

Thank You …


Recommended