HRM IN FOREIGN FIRMS IN INDIA. A RESOURCE-BASED VIEW
Carina B. FriedmannUniversity of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Dirk HoltbrüggeUniversity of Erlangen-Nuremberg
Jonas F. PuckUniversity of Erlangen-Nuremberg
(April 2008)
LASER Discussion Papers - Paper No. 15
(edited by A. Abele-Brehm, R.T. Riphahn, K. Moser and C. Schnabel)
Correspondence to:
Carina B. Friedmann, Lange Gasse 20, 90403 Nuremberg, Germany, Email:[email protected].
Abstract
Currently, foreign firms in India face three major challenges in the field of human resourcemanagement (HRM): personnel recruitment, development and retention. We adapted theresource-based view of the firm (RBV) for HRM, and tested in a sample of 80 foreign firms whichHRM practices have a positive impact on the efficiency of HRM. Our findings suggest that there is aclose relationship between the employment of HRM instruments shaped according to the RBV andHRM efficiency; hence they help foreign firms in India to positively affect the HRM challenge.
Copyright statement
Please do not quote without permission from the authors. Only the final version that will be acceptedfor publication should be cited. This document has been posted for the purpose of discussion and rapiddissemination of preliminary research results.
1
PROBLEM AND OBJECTIVES
In India, foreign direct investment (FDI) has greatly increased over the last few years. In 2006, it
reached 9.5 billion US$, which is an increase of 44.4% compared to 2004 (UNCTAD, 2007). One of
the main reasons why India is so attractive for foreign investors is its human resources, which are
cheap and highly qualified. The use of these resources, however, is not easy. Human resource
management (HRM), therefore, plays a major role because of the importance of the human resources
themselves and the intricacies of their management. A survey among business process outsourcing
firms (BPO) in India revealed that human resources- and organization-related challenges are the most
critical issues (Mehta et al., 2006: 323). For example, at Daimler in Pune HRM is regarded as one of
“the core challenges of the years to come” (Aulbur, 2007). The worry is similarly expressed by a
manager of Lufthansa: „HRM is a big concern in India“ (Pinto, 2007). In particular, three major
challenges in the area of HRM are named: personnel recruitment, personnel development and
personnel retention (Vaishampayan, 2006: 3).
Most foreign firms in India are growing at a very high rate. For example, the software producer SAP
plans to more than double the number of employees from current 3,500 to 8,000 by 2010 (Singh Roy,
2007). In 2006, Dell likewise announced to double its workforce to 20,000 over the year, depending
on trends within the industry (Frauenheim, 2006). In December 2005, Microsoft declared that it is
expecting to double its manpower in India to 6,000 employees by 2009 (Frauenheim, 2006: 6). Growth
is not restricted to the software industry. For example, the American consulting company Accenture
announced in January 2007 its plan to raise the number of its employees from 27,000 to 35,000 by
August 2007 (NN 2007: 16).
Due to the fast growth, many foreign firms in India are confronted with challenges in the area of
personnel recruitment. In a very short period a large number of applications must be viewed and
evaluated. Firms that are not well known in India must also develop a positive corporate image in
order to be recognized as a potential employer. Foreign companies compete with other foreign
2
companies as well as with Indian companies for the most qualified people who are often offered a
number of jobs by different employers.
Despite the overall high level of education at Indian universities and colleges, a study conducted by
McKinsey found that merely 10% of all Indian students with a general degree and 25% of those with
an engineering degree are regarded as suitable to work in MNCs (Farrel, Kaka & Stürze, 2005). The
main reason for this are the large differences in the level of education at the various universities and
colleges across the country. While some have a world-class reputation, others can hardly provide
sufficient education to prepare students for jobs in MNCs (Farrel, Kaka & Stürze, 2005).
Consequently, foreign firms are forced to invest heavily in personnel development to reduce
qualification gaps and to increase the spectrum of employee assignment.
Along with personnel recruitment and development, personnel retention poses a third challenge for
foreign firms in India: “The challenge is not only to get the people in but to keep them in” (Joshi,
2007). Both foreign and domestic companies struggle equally with high rates of attrition. “Firms
operating in India should expect attrition rates of 15-20%, because Indian workers are aspirational and
individualistic”, says Divani Vaishampayan, Regional Human Resources Director for Asia Pacific and
the Middle East at BG Group (Brockett, 2006). Retention below the senior level is seen as a key
success factor for business in India. Steven Helmholz, director of executive talent acquisition at Dell,
says: “At the lower and mid level, you’ve got higher attrition rates. The company that has the better
retention strategy will win” (Frauenheim, 2006: 6).
The main reasons why the challenges of personnel recruitment, development and retention are greater
than in many other countries are the characteristics of the Indian labor market (Figure 1) and the
restrictive Indian labor law. Particularly the latter may cause “extreme difficulties” (Khanna & Palepu,
2006: 49) for foreign companies.
3
Dimensions Characteristics Impact on HRM
Population 1.095.351.995 (July 2006, est.) Basic Figures
Population Growth Rate
1.38% (2006 est.)
Recruitment
Number of Employed
509.300.000 Number of
Employed/Unemploy
ed Unemployment Rate
7.8% (2006 est.)
Recruitment
Total population: 59.5% (2003 est.)
Male: 70.2%
Literacy
Female: 48.3%
Language
15 official languages exist; English is the most important language for national, political, and commercial communication.
Post graduate degree other than technical
6 949 707
Graduate degree other than technical degree
25 666 044
Engineering and technology
2 588 405
Teaching 1 547 671
Medicine 768 964
Agriculture and Dairying 100 126
Veterinary 99 999
Other 22 588
Educational
System
Degree Holders (2001)
Total 37 6701 47
Recruitment
Personnel Development/Training
Retention
Difficulty of Hiring Index
33 (scaled 0 and 100)
Labor Force by Occupation
Agriculture: 60%
Industry: 12%
Services: 28%
Labor Market
Infrastructure
Average Salary Increase
11.9%-16% (2005)
14.4% (2006)
14.5% (2007, predicted)
Recruitment
Personnel Development/Training
Retention
Table 1: Characteristics of the Indian Labor Market (Sources: Census India 2001; World Bank
2007; CIA – The World Factbook 2007; Sen & Earsdon 2007)
4
For example, the World Bank’s Ease of Doing Business Survey ranks India 116 out of 155 countries,
56 places behind Pakistan (neighboring country) and 25 places behind China (competitor) (World
Bank, 2006). The Employing Workers Data published by the World Bank (World Bank, 2006)
supports these observations. According to this report, the difficulty of firing index is nearly twice as
high as the regional average (see table 2). For example, companies employing more than 100 people
need special government permission before they are allowed to terminate employee contracts (Koepff,
2005).
Indicator India
Regional
Average
OECD
Average
Difficulty of Hiring Index 33 41.8 27.0
Rigidity of Hours Index 20 25.0 45.2
Difficulty of Firing Index 70 37.5 27.4
Rigidity of Employment Index 41 34.8 33.3
Non-wage Labor Cost (% of salary) 16.8 6.8 21.4
Firing Costs (weeks of wages) 55.9 71.5 31.3
Table 2: Employing Workers Indices (World Bank, 2006)
Although the importance of HRM and particularly personnel selection, development and retention for
foreign firms in India is frequently mentioned, few empirical studies of this phenomenon exist. E.g.,
Bhudwar & Khatri (2001) compare HRM practices in Britain and India and find significant differences
in recruitment, training and employee communication practices between the two countries. Sing
(2003) analyzes the relationship between HRM practices and outcomes in India, however, without
focusing on foreign firms. Björkman & Budhwar (2007) show that foreign firms which adapt their
HRM practices to the Indian market perform better than firms with globally standardized HRM
practices. While these and other studies are devoted to individual firms and provide first evidence for
5
certain HRM problems, there is a lack of theoretically grounded empirical studies of HRM practices
and outcomes of foreign firms in India. Therefore the objective of this article is to derive testable
hypothesis of the impact of HRM practices on HRM efficiency and to empirically test these
hypothesis in a large-scale study. In particularly, we will adopt the resource-based view of the firm
and analyze whether it can explain differences in HRM efficiency of foreign firms in India.
The remaining part of this paper is organized as follows. In the next section, the resource-based view
of the firm as the conceptual framework of the study is described and adapted to HRM in India.
Afterwards, the research hypotheses are derived. In the fourth section, the research design (sample and
measures) is explained. Then the main results of the main study are presented and critically discussed.
The paper ends with a summary of the main contributions, its limitations and important implications
for further research.
CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK: THE RESOURCE-BASED VIEW OF THE FIRM AND ITS
ADAPTATION TO HRM
The resource-based view of the firm (RBV) was chosen as a conceptual framework because it
provides a theoretical bridge between strategy and HRM (Wright, Dunford & Snell, 2001). Moreover
the RBV has become the most often applied theory in the field of HRM research (McMahan, Virick &
Wright, 1999) and has emerged as “perhaps the predominant approach” (Morris, Snell & Wright,
2006: 433) in this area. The basic logic of the RBV that HRM efficiency leads to a higher firm
performance has been the topic of many previous studies (for an overview see Becker & Gerhart,
1996). More than one hundred research papers in reputable academic journals have treated that issue
in the last two decades, elevating the issue to “the HRM Holy Grail” (Purcell & Kinnie, 2007: 533).
As Wright, Dunford and Snell (2001: 706) state, “the RBV provided a compelling explanation for why
HR practices lead to competitive advantage”.
For a long time, the HRM literature was dominated by an ‘outside-in’ perspective. External factors
such as the labor market, the competition within the industry or national culture were argued to
6
influence the use of HRM practices (e.g. Huselid, Jackson & Schuler, 1997; Brewster, 2004). The
RBV opposes this idea. The core assumption is that the success of a firm is decisively determined by
its specific and unique potential. Thus, internal resources instead of external conditions are regarded as
key factors of a firm’s performance and success. According to the RBV, human resources are an
important source of sustainable competitive advantage which contribute to the success of a firm (Saá-
Pérez & García-Falcón, 2002; Wright, Dunford & Snell, 2001).
According to Barney (1991), to obtain competitive advantage a resource must be (1) valuable in the
sense of being profitable for the firm, (2) rare among a firm’s potential and current competitors, (3)
imperfectly imitable, and (4) non-substitutable. Other authors like Lepak & Snell (1999) and Hoopes,
Madsen & Walker (2003) claim that of these characteristics only value and inimitability are crucial
and argue “that rareness is important only if a resource is valuable and exists only if the resource
cannot be imitated by competitors” (Hoopes, Madsen & Walker, 2003: 890). Following this view,
value, inimitability and uniqueness (firm-specificity) will be referred to as main characteristics of
human resources which lead to competitive advantage. Thus, firms can attain sustainable competitive
advantage in the field of HRM when they (1) possess a valuable and unique workforce that differs
from that of their competitors, and (2) apply HRM practices which are imperfectly imitable for
competitors.
Value refers to the workforce and is based on the strategic advantage of minor task-specificity.
Employees with broad qualifications can take up different tasks and “enable a firm to conceive of or
implement strategies that improve its efficiency and effectiveness” (Barney, 1991: 106). Hence a
workforce with broad knowledge and skills is more valuable for a firm than employees with narrow
qualifications.
Uniqueness – based on firm-specificity – implies that the workforce has firm-specific capabilities that
can be best seized in the context of a particular firm. Firm specificity makes employees less mobile
since a change of the employer would mean a decrease in value for the employee and the firm and is
thus less likely to happen: “As human capital becomes more idiosyncratic to a particular firm,
7
externalization may prove infeasible and/or incur excessive costs” (Lepak & Snell, 1999: 36).
Additionally, a firm-specific workforce is socially embedded in the firm and less prone to favor other
employers. Hence, the firm-specificity of employees has a positive impact on attrition.
Imperfect imitability is the third pillar of sustainable competitive advantage. Processes need to be
developed in such a way that they are too complex for competitors to be imitated. Three ways of
creating barriers for imitation are mentioned in the RBV literature. (1) Unique timing and learning
means that “valuable specialized resources (…) are developed over time through opportunities that do
not repeat themselves” (Boxall & Purcell, 2003: 76). (2) Social complexity may be defined as patterns
of teamwork and coordination and is “the prime reason, why firms in some sectors sometimes try to
recruit an entire team of employees” (Boxall & Purcell, 2003: 77). (3) Causal ambiguity exists “when
the link between the resources controlled by a firm and a firm’s sustained competitive advantage is not
understood or understood only very imperfectly” (Barney, 1991: 108).
Value, uniqueness and inimitability are argued to enhance HRM efficiency. In the Indian context, this
means that HRM practices with these three characteristics have a positive impact on the number of
qualified applicants, the spectrum of employee assignment, and the attrition rate. Moreover, it is
argued that these outcomes can be best achieved by particular HRM instruments in the areas of
recruitment, development and retention which meet the criteria of the RBV, i.e. which are valuable,
unique and inimitable. Table 3 presents the conceptual framework of the study where these concepts
are systematically integrated.
On the vertical axis, the characteristics of the RBV – value, uniqueness, and inimitability – and its
specifications are listed. On the horizontal axis, the three challenges of HRM in India are stated:
recruitment, development, and retention. The result is a matrix with nine fields where for each
characteristic of the RBV and each HRM instrument an appropriate HRM practice is suggested. Based
on this conceptual framework, our research hypotheses will be derived in the following.
8
HRM Instruments
Recruitment Development Retention
Value Task-Specificity, Heterogeneity
Personnel
Marketing
Team-oriented
Training
Financial
Incentives
Uniqueness Firm-Specificity, Immobility
Employer
Image
Firm-Specific
Training
Career
Management
Cri
teri
a o
f th
e R
BV
Inimitability
Unique Timing and Learning, Social Complexity, Causal Ambiguity
Internal
Recruitment
In-House
Training
Idiosyncratic
Job-Creation
Table 3: Relationship between RBV and HRM instruments
9
HYPOTHESES
Personnel Recruitment and HRM Efficiency
According to Bratton & Gold (2003: 488), personnel recruitment can be defined as “the process of
generating a pool of capable people to apply for employment to an organization”. Employers can
either be recruited internally within a firm or from the external labor market. While there are
advantages of both forms of recruitment most firms use both approaches, i.e. they “make and buy their
human capital” (Lepak & Snell, 1999: 32). From a RBV perspective, particularly personnel marketing
(value), employer image (uniqueness), and internal recruitment (inimitability) are argued to increase
the number of qualified applicants.
In fast-growing economies like India, firms cannot survive on internal recruitment. When expanding
on a grand scale and in a short time, they must also attract qualified candidates on the external labor
market (Ding, Fields & Akthar, 1997). Since the number of qualified people in India is very limited,
firms have to find innovative ways of personnel marketing to enlarge the pool of candidates, e.g. by
focusing on a wider geographical area or applying a wider spectrum of recruitment instruments. By
applying appropriate instruments of personnel marketing, firms can enhance the number of qualified
applicants (Breaugh & Starke, 2000). This leads to the following hypothesis:
Hypothesis 1a: Personnel marketing is positively related to the number of qualified applicants.
The image of a company is decisive on whether it is perceived as an attractive employer or not, and
thus on how much effort it needs to find potential employees. Several studies have investigated the
impact of such factors as location, wage level, industry or corporate culture on recruitment
effectiveness, tracing back high effectiveness of recruiting to corporate reputation (Birker 2002;
Gatewood, Gowan & Lautenschlager, 1993; Orlitzky 2007). This leads to the assumption that
employer image, being firm-specific, leads to a higher number of qualified applicants. Thus the
following hypothesis can be derived.
10
Hypothesis 1b: Employer image is positively related to the number of qualified applicants.
According to the RBV, the main advantage of internal employment is to sustain and enhance firm-
specific qualifications: “As human capital becomes more idiosyncratic to a particular firm,
externalization may prove infeasible and/or incur excessive costs” (Lepak& Snell, 1999: 36). In this
way, employees can become a unique asset to a firm and its competitive advantage. Thus it is assumed
that a firm that concentrates on internal recruitment develops competitively advantageous human
resources. Internal recruitment is assumed to have two positive effects. First, it increases the social
embeddedness and hence the immobility of employees. In the process of internal recruitment the firm-
specific skills, e.g. tacit knowledge of unique routines and procedures or experience with specific
management systems and processes increases. These “non-portable assets” (Groysberg, Nanda &
Nohira, 2006: 99) lose its value when the employee leaves the company. For employees this means
that they would automatically lose an important part of their skills, and subsequently another company
would be less interested in hiring them. Second, firm-specific skills are enhanced through internal
recruitment, since employees learn and accumulate knowledge over time. Through internal
recruitment employees gain knowledge within the firm which enlarges their firm-specific knowledge
base. Internal recruitment refers to both: vertical and horizontal promotion. In that way a large number
of employees can be addressed and becomes more qualified. Therefore it can be proposed:
Hypothesis 1c: Internal recruitment is positively related to the number of qualified applicants.
Personnel Development and HRM Efficiency
Personnel development is essential to create a unique and valuable workforce. In India, facing a great
demand for people and a partially deficient educational system, companies may not expect newly
recruited people to be able to take up jobs without intense company training (Hamm, 2007; Mankad,
2006). From a RBV perspective, particularly team-oriented training (value), firm-specific training
(uniqueness), and in-house training (inimitability) we argued to enhance the spectrum of employee
assignment.
11
A workforce that possesses a broad spectrum of capabilities (minor task-specificity) is a main source
of competitive advantage (e.g., Grant, 1991). Particular teamwork where employees are working in
multifunctional teams and have to fulfill tasks that are not directly related to their usual tasks are
argued to enhance the variety of qualifications (e.g., Huselid, Jackson & Schuler, 1997; De Saá-Pérez
& García-Falcón, 2002). Thus, team oriented training enables employees to take over a broader
spectrum of positions and increases the value of employees for the company. Based on this assumption
it can be proposed:
Hypothesis 2a: Team-oriented training is positively related to the spectrum of employee assignment.
According to the RBV, a unique workforce leads to competitive advantage. One instrument to increase
the uniqueness of employees is firm-specific training. Firm-specific training supports the development
of a unique corporate culture and of idiosyncratic organizational structures and processes. Moreover, it
increases the mutual dependency between the company and its employees. E.g., Perez, Wen &
Mahatanankoon (2004) describe the case of team-based development in combination with SAP
software which leads to an environment where the success of any individual is critically dependent on
the skills possessed by the other team members. Thus, the firm specificity of the employees’
knowledge and qualifications reduces their ability to change their employer and increases their ability
to take over different positions in the same company. Based on this argumentation it can be proposed:
Hypothesis 2b: Firm-specific training is positively related to the spectrum of employee assignment.
Generally, training can be offered externally or by in-house facilities. According to the RBV, in-house
training is particularly useful because it does not only impart explicit but also implicit knowledge
which is deeply embedded in firm routines, procedures and structures. Therefore, it is difficult to
imitate by other firms. At the same time, it enhances the spectrum of employee assignment (van der
Klink & Streumer, 2006). For example, firms can give their employees access to implicit knowledge
that is critical for its success without fearing that this knowledge may be misused when these
12
employees leave the firm. The embeddedness of implicit knowledge in the specific context is a barrier
to imitation. Thus is can be proposed:
Hypothesis 2c: In-house training is positively related to the spectrum of employee assignment.
Personnel Retention and HRM Efficiency
Empirical studies (e.g., Bhal & Gulati, 2007; Jawahara, 2006; Lee et al., 2004) reveal that employee
turnover depends on several factors such as calculative, alternative or contractual forces (Maertz &
Griffeth, 2004). From a RBV perspective, particularly performance appraisal systems (value), career
perspectives (uniqueness) and job tasks (inimitability) are argued to reduce attrition.
Offering financial incentives is seen as one of the most important instruments to retain employees.
Several studies have shown that a firm’s pay system affects the probability of voluntary turnover
(Griffeth, Hom & Gaertner, 2000; Sturman et al., 2003). The compensation, in turn, reflects the value
of the employee for a firm, which is expressed in Hypothesis 3a.
Hypothesis 3a: Individual compensation is negatively related to attrition.
Individual career plans offer employees perspectives for their future development in a company and
are thus assumed to reduce the attrition rate. In a study conducted by the Corporate Leadership
Council (2006), 68 percent of the respondents named employee career management as an appropriate
tool for retaining high performers. This is also true for India where systematic career development is
generally viewed as key to retention, because it makes “employees understand that there is a future for
them” (Vaishampayan, 2006: 3). Individual career management is task-specific because it depends on
the specific mingling of two factors, the employee and the firm, thus creating uniqueness for the firm.
Hence, individual career management in terms of “activities and processes to match individual needs
13
and aspirations with organization needs, set within an integrative framework” (Bratton & Gold, 2003:
484) are assumed to reduce attrition.
Hypothesis 3b: Individual career management is negatively related to attrition.
Finally, job tasks are an important determinant of employee turnover. Several empirical studies (e.g.,
Hinton & Biderman, 1995; Hom & Kinicki, 2001) show that employees who are dissatisfied with their
jobs have a strong tendency to look for alternative job opportunities and, if these are not offered by
their current employer, to leave the company. One instrument to increase the satisfaction of employers
with their job tasks is to offer them the possibility to design their job according to their individual
qualifications and motivation. Idiosyncratic jobs are defined by two characteristics. First, the job
position is created according to the current job holder. Secondly, the job tasks are defined “to match
the perceived abilities, interest, or priorities of the person around whom the position was created”
(Miner, 1987: 327).
Idiosyncratic jobs are difficult to imitate because their contents largely depend on the particular job
holder. Moreover, they reduce the likelihood to leave the firm and to look for another employer since
idiosyncratic jobs perfectly fit the employee’s qualifications and motivation (Hatch & Dyer, 2004).
Thus, the following hypothesis can be derived.
Hypothesis 3c: Idiosyncratic job design is negatively related to attrition. Figure 1 presents the conceptual model which will be tested in this study.
14
Personnel Recruitment
Personnel
Marketing
Employer
Image
Internal
Recruitment
Personnel Development Personnel Retention
In-House
Training
Firm-
Specific
Training
Cross
Training
Financial
Incentives
Career
Management
Idiosyncratic
Job-
Creation
Number of Qualified
Applicants
Spectrum of Employee
AssignmentAttrition
Subsidiary
Age
HRM
Practices
HRM
Efficiency
Control
Variables
H1a H1b H1c H2a H2b H2c H3a H3b H3c
Personnel Recruitment
Personnel
Marketing
Employer
Image
Internal
Recruitment
Personnel Development Personnel Retention
In-House
Training
Firm-
Specific
Training
Cross
Training
Financial
Incentives
Career
Management
Idiosyncratic
Job-
Creation
Number of Qualified
Applicants
Spectrum of Employee
AssignmentAttrition
Subsidiary
Age
HRM
Practices
HRM
Efficiency
Control
Variables
H1a H1b H1c H2a H2b H2c H3a H3b H3c
Figure 1: Conceptual Model
15
METHODOLOGY
Sample and Sampling Procedure
To test the hypothesis developed in the last paragraph, a standardized online survey using the software
’umfragecenter’ 5.0 by Globalpark was conducted. The reason for the choice of this method was the
fact that most people addressed were not known beforehand. In addition, the aim was to guarantee
anonymity since many data in the field of HRM, e.g. attrition figures, are sensitive.
To gain access to the addresses of foreign firms in India, foreign chambers of commerce, high
commissions or similar institutions of the most important investor countries were contacted. They
were sent an email containing information about the research project with the request to provide
addresses of companies from these countries operating in India. Addresses were provided for
companies originating in France, Germany, the Netherlands, and Switzerland. Firms from these
countries were asked to participate in the online survey in an email which contained the most
important information on the purpose of the study. The questionnaire was available online from July
25 until August 31, 2007.
The link to the online questionnaire was sent to all addresses that were provided by the institutions
from the above named countries. These lists of addresses were partly outdated, which resulted in many
failed deliveries. Since it is not obvious how many of the email addresses were still in use, the number
of firms that received the questionnaire is not known.
Altogether 80 questionnaires were received. Although the sample size might appear relatively small, it
allows to test the research hypothesis in the previous chapter and to provide at least first insights into
HRM policies of foreign firms in India. Nevertheless, the relatively small sample size is a limitation of
this study and will be discussed further in the final section.
The respondents were mainly CEOs or members of the top-management. On average, they work in the
respective company for 8.86 years and have 8.57 years of HRM experience. The firms in our study
16
have on average 206 employees and have been operating in India for between 1 and 60 years (average
of 14 years). The majority of the workforce in the respective firms are employed in the Western
Economic Corridor (metropolitan area of Mumbai, Pune, Nashik, Surat, Baroda, Ahmedabad, Kandia),
followed by the Economic Triange of the South (Hyderabad, Bengaluru, Madras) and the National
Capital Region (metropolitan area of Delhi, Noida, Ghaziabad, Guragon, Faridabad). Five respondents
come from other regions.
Measures
The measures were developed on the basis of previous empirical studies in the field of HRM. The
questionnaire has been pre-tested in four interviews with HR managers. Recommendations and
suggestions were incorporated and the former questionnaire was adjusted accordingly. Moreover, it
has been sent to Indian students of the Indian Institute of Management Bangalore (IIMB) ensure that
the questions are understood in the Indian context.
Dependent Variables
The efficiency of HRM was split into three areas which refer to the most important HRM issues faced
by foreign firms in India: (1) the number of qualified applicants, (2) the spectrum of employee
assignment and (3) attrition.
For the number of qualified applicants, measures were adapted from Becker, Huselid & Ulrich (2001).
The respondents were asked for (1) the interview per offer ratio, (2) the time-span between the first
advertisements of a vacancy and the final staffing, and (3) the time it takes until a new employee can
fully fill his position. The internal reliability of this measure proved to be high with Cronbach’s Alpha
= 0.72.
To measure the spectrum of employee assignment, the respondents were asked to indicate the
percentage of employees who had been shifted horizontally and vertically within the last year.
17
Attrition was measured as the ratio between the number of employees who had left the firm in the last
year and the number of employees who had joined.
Independent Variables
Nine independent variables were included in the study. To measure personnel marketing, the
respondents were presented a list of 19 instruments taken from the literature (e.g., Becker, Huselid &
Ulrich, 2001) and asked to rate their relevance on a Likert scale (ranging from 1 = “never applied” to 7
= “very often applied”). The arithmetical average of these instruments was calculated, showing the
extent of efforts to enlarge the pool of applicants (Cronbach’s Alpha = 0.91).
Employer image was measured as subjective perception of the respondents on a Likert scale, ranging
from 1 = “very negative” to 7 = “very positive”.
Internal recruitment was measured by the percentage of vacancies that are filled internally.
Cross-training was measured by asking the respondents to assess the relevance of team work and
team-orientated training on a Likert scale (ranging from 1 = “not relevant, never to” 7 = “very
relevant, very frequently”). These three measures to evaluate the extent of cross-training were adapted
from Becker, Huselid & Ulrich (2001) and provided a reliability of 0.62 (Crombachs Alpha).
To measure firm-specific training, the respondents were asked to evaluate the relevance of “training
which concentrates on knowledge and practices that are specific and unique to a particular firm (e.g.
firm-specific software or product knowledge)” on a Likert scale with 1 = “not relevant” and 7 = “very
relevant”.
In-house training was measured by asking the respondents to indicate the percentage of training that is
provided by in-house facilities in the particular firm.
Financial incentives was measured by asking the respondents to rate the extent to which performance
appraisal systems affect individual compensations. A Likert scale ranging from 1 = “don’t affect” to 7
= “strongly affect” was used.
18
Career management was measured by asking the respondents to assess the extent to which
performance appraisal systems affect individual career plans.
The degree of idiosyncratic job creation was measured by asking the respondents to evaluate the
following statements on a Likert scale ranging from 1 = “completely disagree” to 7 = “completely
agree”: “We employ high potentials and talents and give them to a great extent the freedom to shape
their work content”.
Control Variables
Subsidiary age was included as a control variable. The RBV argues that HRM practices are path-
dependent, i.e. the spectrum of alternatives at a given moment in time depends on the decisions made
in the past. Thus the age of a company may influence both HRM practices and outcomes. To measure
this control variable, the respondents were asked for the year their company was established in India.
This figure was subtracted from 2007 (the year of the study), thus indicating the length of operation.
Several measures to reduce common method bias were employed (Podsakoff et al., 2003). In
particular, we separated items measuring the same construct as well as dependent and independent
variablesin the questionnaire. Moreover, we protected and assured respondent anonymity and reduced
the danger of evaluation apprehension by explaining in the cover mail that there are neither ‘right’ nor
‘wrong’ answers.
19
FINDINGS
Table 4 shows the descriptive statistics of the dependent and independent variables.
Mean Standard
Deviation
Min. Max.
Number of Qualified Applicants 2.50 1.55 1 5.33
Spectrum of Employee Assignment 18.05 19.99 1 80
Attrition .90 1.71 .90 10
Personnel Marketing 2.28 1.21 1 4.47
Employer Image 4.77 2.02 1 7
Internal Recruitment 26.64 26.92 1 80
Cross-Training 4.30 1.26 1 7
Firm-specific Training 4.05 2.39 1 7
In-house Training 2.70 2.17 1 7
Financial Incentives 4.32 2.28 1 7
Career Management 3.98 2.37 1 7
Idiosyncratic job creation 4.42 2.26 1 7
Table 4: Descriptive Statistics
Multiple regression analyses were applied to analyze the hypothesized relationships. To test for
multicollinearity, we calculated Variance Inflation Factors (VIFs). There were no concerns for
mulicollinearity since there was no VIF above 8 and the mean of all VIFs was below 1 as
recommended by Chatterjee and Price (1991).
The first regression analyzing the antecedents of the number of qualified applicants explains 17.8% of
the variance and is significant on a high level (p<.01). As hypothesized, we found a significant and
positive effect of personnel marketing on the number of qualified applicants (.095; p<.05), providing
support for Hypothesis 1. Hypothesis 2 was confirmed, too: employer image influences the number of
qualified applicants positively and on a high level of significance (.216; p<.01). Contrary to that, the
assumed positive influence of internal recruitment was not confirmed significantly. The results show a
positive, but non-significant influence.
20
In contrast to the first regression, the second regression was non significant and even produced a
negative adj. R2. Thus, while positive relations between the variables were found, our data could not
confirm any of the hypothesized relations (Hypotheses 4-6).
The third regression using attrition as a dependent variable explained 18.5% of the variance and was
significant on a high level (p<.01). The results lend support for hypothesis 7 and show a significant
and negative impact of financial incentives on attrition (-.289; p<.05). While the coefficient for career
management is negative, too, it is not significant. Therefore, hypothesis 8 could not be supported by
the data. Finally, hypothesis 9 was supported by our results. The coefficient is negative and shows an
acceptable level of significance (-.174, p<.05).
Number of qualified
applicants
Spectrum of
employee
assignment
Attrition
Personnel Marketing ,095*
Employer Image ,216**
Internal Recruitment ,200
Cross-Training ,117
Firm-specific Training ,047
In-house Training ,115
Financial Incentives -,289*
Career Management -,257
Idiosyncratic Job Creation -,174*
Subsidiary Age ,323** -,145 -,148
R2 ,219 ,062 ,261
Adj. R2 ,178 -,015 ,185
F 5,273** 1,230 4,891**
n=80; *p<,05; **p<0,01; standardized coefficients shown
Table 5: Regressions
21
DISCUSSION
The results of the regression lend support to our theoretical framework and reveal significant
influences of the independent variables on the dependent variables ‘number of qualified applicants’
and ‘attrition’.
As hypothesized, personnel marketing and employer image show a significant impact on the number
of qualified applicants in the first regression. This supports the strong roles of value and barriers to
imitation for recruiting in India. Contrary to our expectations, internal recruitment did not enter the
regression significantly. A possible explanation might be that internal recruitment has not yet been
largely formalized in foreign firms in India and may therefore be of lower relevance for the number of
qualified applicants.
The regression on the ‘spectrum of employee assignment’ was not significant. A possible reason can
be found in the current structure and high volatility of the Indian labor market. Most employees do not
stay with a firm for a long time. To move on in their career, it is seen more promising to change the
employer than to stay with the same firm for a longer period of time. Hence, even when cross-training,
firm-specific training and in-house training are provided, this does not necessarily result in an enlarged
spectrum of employee assignment in the same firm. The result of training might be only become
obvious once the employee who has started working for another employer.
For the third dependent variable – attrition – financial incentives and idiosyncratic job creation have a
significant influence, lending support for hypotheses 7 and 9. The assumed relation between career
management and attrition could not be confirmed. Again, the reason might be the volatility of the
Indian labor market. Career management, being an instrument which can only be assessed in the long
term, might not become effective in the Indian labor market which has, on average an attrition rate of
15-20% (Brockett, 2006). Thus, before career management tools can effectively help to reduce
attrition, the employee might already work for another firm. The other two variables which showed an
influence on attrition are both short term instruments, resulting in effectiveness even in a labor market
which is characterized by employees with a low loyalty to their current employer.
22
While our control variable subsidiary age shows are very high level of significance in the first
regression, it is not significant in the second and third regression. Thus it can be argued that firms
which operate in India for a longer period find it easier to increase the number of qualified applicants
than newcomers. One explanation might be that firms with long history in India are better known by
potential applicants. Moreover, experienced firms are likely to have a greater knowledge of the Indian
labor market and may adjust their recruitment strategy accordingly.
23
CONTRIBUTIONS, LIMITATIONS AND SUGGESTIONS FOR FURTHER STUDIES
This study has investigated which HRM practices support foreign firms in India in overcoming the HR
challenges of recruitment, development and retention, thus creating a competitive advantage. On the
basis of the RBV, nine hypotheses of relationships between HRM practices and outcome were derived
and empirically tested in a sample of 80 firms originating from France, Germany, the Netherlands, and
Switzerland. The study makes several important contributions both to practice and theory.
A key result of this study is that foreign firms in India are able to increase the number of qualified
applicants by personnel marketing and by enhancing their employer image. This is important since
there is a strong competition among foreign and local firms on the Indian labor market for a very small
number of qualified employees. Only those firms which are able to recruit the most qualified
employees may realize sustainable competitive advantage.
In India – like in most other countries – it is not only important to recruit qualified employees but also
to retain them. In this context the study has shown that high attrition rates in foreign firms can be
reduced by individual performance evaluation and reward systems. Since the loyalty of Indian
employees to their employer is low, attrition can be reduced by individual performance evaluation and
reward systems. Moreover, idiosyncratic jobs which may be individually designed by the employees
to fit their specific qualifications and motivations are feasible, too.
When interpreting these results and adapting them to a specific firm, several limitations of the study
have to be taken into account. One shortcoming of this study is the relatively small sample size. Small
sample sizes are problematic, first because of the danger of being not representative (Bortz & Döring,
2006; Schnell, Hill & Esser, 1999), and second because the potential relationships between the
variables tend to be suppressed, leading to non-significant results (Lee, Phan & Chan, 2005). For
example, this might be the reason why our second regression analyzing the impact of HRM practices
on the spectrum of employee assignment was not significant. Therefore, this study has to be regarded
as explorative and as a very first investigation of a new phenomenon, only.
24
Another shortcoming is the heterogeneity of the sample in terms of home country and industry. Due to
the relatively small sample size we were not able to control for possible influences of these factors.
Future studies with more homogeneous samples would allow to analyze the question whether the
HRM practices that proved to be efficient in our study are appropriate for all firms or whether they
have to be adapted to the particular context.
Like in many similar empirical studies, our study has a potential single-respondent bias. Although we
employed several measures to reduce this common method problem, future studies should try to
collect data from multiple sources to enhance the reliability of responses. In particular mirror-image
designs with respondents coming from both the top-management and the HR department are useful to
analyze the performance implications of HRM.
Finally, future studies should put more emphasis on the question which characteristics of the Indian
culture, labor market and business environment may explain the efficiency of different HRM
instruments. One alley for future research are case studies which are able to shed more light on the
complex relationships between country-specific conditions, HRM practices and their outcomes as well
as their overall performance implications.
REFERENCES
Aulbur, W. (2007) Corporate Presentation Daimler Chrysler, Pune/India, 24/01/2007.
Backhaus, K. et al. (2006) Multivariate Analysemethoden. Eine anwendungsorientierte Einführung, Springer: Berlin.
Barney, J.B. (1991) ‘Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage’, Journal of Management 17(1): 99-120.
Becker, B. and Gerhart, B. (1996) ‘The Impact of Human Resource Management on Organizational Performance: Progress and Prospects’, Academy of Management Journal 39(4): 779-801.
Becker, B.E. and Huselid, M.A. (2006) ‘Strategic Human Resource Management: Where Do We Go From Here?’, Journal of Management, 32(6): 898-925.
Becker, B.E., Huselid, M.E. and Ulrich, D. (2001) The HR Scorecard. Linking People, Strategy, and
Performance, Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
Beer et al. (1984) Managing Human Assets, New York: Free Press.
Bhal, K. T. and Gulati, N. (2007) ‘Pay Satisfaction of Software Professionals in India’, The Journal of
Decision Makers, 32(3): 9-21.
Birker, K. (2002) ‘Personalmarktforschung’, in: R. Bröckermann, W. Pepels, W. (eds.): Personalmarketing. Akquisition – Bindung – Freistellung, Schaeffer-Pöschel: Stuttgart.
Björkman, I. & Budhwar, P. (2007): When in Rome …? Human Resource Management and the Performance of Foreign Firms operating in India, Employee Relations, 2007, 29(6): 595-610.
Boxall, P. and Purcell, J. (2003) Strategy and Human Resource Management, New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
Bratton, J. and Gold, J. (2003) Human Resource Management. Theory and Practice, Basingstoke: Palgrave MacMillan.
Breaugh, A. B. and Starke, M. (2000), ‘Research on Employee Recruitment: So many Studies, So many Remaining Questions’, Journal of Management 26(3): 405-434.
Brewster, C. (2004), ‘European perspectives on human resource management’, Human Resource
Management Review 14(4): 365-382. Brockett, J. (2006) ‘Talent War in India and China’, Peoplemanagement, 26/10/2006: 14.
Budhwar, P.S. and Khatri, N. (2001) ‘A Comparative Study of HR Practices in Britain and India’, International Journal of Human Resource Management 12(5): 800-826.
Chatterjee, S.R. and Price, B. (1991), Regression Analysis by Example. New York:Wiley.
CIA (2007): The World Factbook – India, https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/geos/in.html, 17/08/2007.
Corporate Leadership Council (2006) Career Pathing Processes and Tools, https://www.clc.executiveboard.com/Public/Default.aspx, 09/06/2007.
Delios, A., Xu, W.W. and Singh, K. (2007) ‘Strategy Research in Asia’, in H.W. Yeung (ed.): Handbook of Research on Asian Business: 46-61.
Ding, D., Field, D. and Akthar, S. (1997), ‘An Empirical Study of Human Resource Management Policies and Practices in Foreign-Invested Enterprises in China: The Case of Shenzen Special Economic Zone’, The International Journal of Human Resource Management 8(5): 595-613.
Farrell, D., Kaka, N. and Stürze, S. (2005) ‘Ensuring India’s Offshoring Future’, The McKinsey
Quarterly, Special Edition: Fulfilling India’s Promise: 75-83.
26
Frauenheim, E. (2006) ‘Indian Leader in Demand amid Rapid Expansion’, Workforce Management 85(7): 6.
Gatewood, R. D., Gowan, M. A. and Lautenschlager, G. J. (1993), ‘Corporate Image, Recruitment Iamge, and Initial Job choice Decisions’, Academy of Management Journal 36(2): 414-428.
Grant, R. M. (1991) ‘The Resource-Based Theory of Competitive Advantage: Implications for Strategy Formulation’, California Management Review, 33 (3): 114-135.
Griffeth, R. W., Hom, P. W. and Gaertner, S. (2000) ‘A Meta-Analysis of Antecedents and Correlates of Employee Turnover: Update, Moderator Tests, and Research Implications for the Next Millennium’, Journal of Management 26(3): 463-488.
Groysberg, B., Nanda, A. and Nohria, N. (2004) ‘The Risky Business of Hiring Stars’, Harvard
Business Review 82(5): 92-100.
Groysberg, B./Nanda, A./Nohria, N. (2006) ‘Are Leaders Portable?’, Harvard Business Review, 84(5): 92-100.
Hamm, S. (2007) Bangalore Tiger. How Indian Tech Upstart Wipro is rewriting the Rules of Global
Competition, New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill.
Hatch, N.W. and Dyer, J.H. (2004) ‘Human Capital and Learning as a Source of Sustainable Competitive Advantage’, Strategic Management Journal 25(12): 1155-1178.
Hinton, M. and Biderman, M. (1995) ‘Empirically Derived Job Characteristics Measures and the Motivating Potential Score’, Journal of Business & Psychology, 9(4): 355-364.
Hom, P. W. and Kinicki, A. J. (2001) ‘Toward a Greater Understanding of How Dissatisfaction Drives Employee Turnover’, Academy of Management Journal 44(5): 975-987.
Hoopes, D.G., Madsen, T.L. and Walker, G. (2003) ‘Why is there a Resource-Based View? Toward a Theory of Competitive Heterogeneity’, Strategic Management Journal 24(10): 889-902.
Huf, S. (2006) ‚Personalmanagement als Erfolgsfaktor’, Personal, 6: 26-29.
Huselid, M. A., Jackson, S. E. and Schuler, R. S. (1997), ‘Technical and strategic human resources management effectiveness as determinants of firm performance’, Academy of Management Journal 40(1): 171-189.
Huselid, M.A. (1993) ‘The Impact of Environmental Votality on Human Resource Planning and Strategic Human Resource Management’, Human Resource Planning 16(3): 35-51.
Huselid, M.A., Jackson, S.E. and Schuler, R.S. (1997), ‘Technical and strategic human resource management effectiveness as determinants of firm performance’, Academy of Management Journal 40(1): 171-188. Jawahara, I. M. (2006) ‘Correlates of Satisfaction with Performance Appraisal Feedback’, Journal of
Labor Research 27(2): 213-236.
Khanna, T. and Palepu, K.G. (2006) ‚Aufstrebende Riesen. So entstehen Weltklassenunternehmen in Entwicklungsländern’, Harvard Business Manager 28 (12): 40-53.
Klink van der, M. R. and Streumer, J. N. (2006) ‘Explaining the (In-)Effectiveness of On-the-Job Training’, International Journal of Human Resource Development & Management 6(1): 114-130.
Koepff, A.G. (2005), Das indische Arbeitsrecht. Eine Untersuchung der Grundlagen,
Wesensmerkmale und Perspektiven, Aachen: Shaker.
Lee, S.H., Phan, P.H. and Chan, E. (2005) ‘The impact of HR configuration on Firm Performance in Singapore: A Resource-Based Explanation’, International Journal of Human Resource Management 16(9): 1740 -1758.
Lee, T. W. et al. (2004) ‘The Effects of Job Embededdness on Organizational Citizenship, Job Performance, Volitional Absences, and Voluntary Turnover’, Academy of Management Journal 47(3): 711-722.
27
Lepak, D.P. and Snell, S.A. (1999) ‘The Human Resource Architecture: Toward a Theory of Human Capital Allocation and Development’, Academy of Management Review, 24(1): 31-48.
Maertz, C. P. and Griffeth, R.W. (2004) ‘Eight Motivational Forces and Voluntary Turnover: A Theoretical Synthesis with Implications for Research’, Journal of Management 30(5): 667-683.
Mankad, R. (2006) Infosys Technologies: Training for Retaining. Case Study, www.ecch.com, 18/04/2007.
McMahan, G. C., Virick, M. and Wright, P. M. (1999), ‘Alternative theoretical perspectives for strategic human resource management revisited: Progress, problems, and prospects’, in: P. Wright, P., L. Dyer, J. Boudreau and G. Milkovich (eds.): Research in Personnel and Human Resource
Management, Special Topic Volume, Greenwich: JAI Press.
Mehta et al. (2006) ‘Challenges and Opportunities of Business Process Outsourcing in India’, Journal
of Labor Research 27 (3): 323- 338.
Miner, A.S. (1987) ‘Idiosyncratic Jobs in Formalized Organizations’, Administrative Science
Quarterly 32: 327-351.
Morris, S.S., Snell, S.A. and Wright, P.M. (2006) ‘A Resource-Based View of International Human Resources: Toward a Framework of Integrative and Creative Capabilities’, in: G.K. Stahl and I. Björkman (eds.): Handbook of Research in International Human Resource Management, Cheltenham – Northampton: Edward Elgar.
Newbert, S.L. (2007) ‘Empirical Research On the Resource-Based View of the Firm: An Assessment and Suggestions for Further Research’, Strategic Management Journal 28(2): 121-146.
NN (2007a) ‘Accenture India to ramp up Headcount to 35 000’, The Financial Express 30/01/2007: 16.
Orlitzky, M. (2007) ‘Recruitment Strategy’, P. Boxall, J. Purcell, J. and P.M. Wright, (eds.): The
Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management, New York: Oxford University Press: 273-299.
Penrose, E.T. (1959) The Theory of Growth of the Firm, London: Basil-Blackwell.
Perez, R.G., Wen, H.J. and Mahatanankoon, P. (2004) ‘Systems Development Project Team Management. A Resource-Based View’, Human Systems Management 23: 169-177.
Pinto, R. (2007) Corporate Presentation Lufthansa India. Mumbai, 25/01/2007.
Podsakoff, P.M., MacKenzie, S.B. and Lee, J.-Y./Podsakoff, N.P. (2003) ‘Common Method Biases in Behavioral Research: A Critical Review of the Literature and Recommended Remedies’, Journal of
Applied Psychology 88(5): 879-903.
Priem, R.L. and Butler, J.E. (2001a) ‘Is the Resource-Based “View” a Useful Perspective for Strategic Management Research?’, Academy of Management Review 26(1): 22-40.
Priem, R.L. and Butler, J.E. (2001b) ‘Tautology in the Resource-Based View and the Implications of Externally Determined Resource Value: Further Comments’, Academy of Management Review 26 (1): 57-65.
Purcell, J. and Kinnie, N. (2007) ‘HRM and Business Performance’, in: P. Boxall, J. Purcell, J. and P.M. Wright (eds.): The Oxford Handbook of Human Resource Management, New York: Oxford University Press: 533-551.
Saá-Pérez, P. De and García-Falcón, J.M. (2002) ‘A Resource-Based View of Human Resource Management and Organizational Capabilities Development’, International Journal of Human
Resource Management 13(1): 123-140.
Sen, C. and Earsdon, M. (2007) ‘India Inc Predicts Further Substantial Salary Increases in 2007’, Hewitt Annual Study Reports, http://www.hewittassociates.com/Intl/AP/en-IN/AboutHewitt/Newsroom/PressReleases/2007/march-15-2007.aspx, 09/07/2007.
28
Singh Roy, A. (2007) SAP India to double Headcount by 2010, Hindu Business Line 19th February 2007, http://www.blonnet.com/2007/02/19/stories/2007021901830200. htm, 31/08/2007.
Singh, K. (2003), ‘Strategic HR Orientation and Firm Performance in India’, International Journal of
Human Resource Management 14(4): 530-543.
Sturman, M. C., Trevor, C. O., Boudreau, J. W. and Gerhart, B. (2003) ‘Is it Worth to win the Talent War? Evaluating the Utility of Performance-Based Pay’, Personnel Psychology, 56(4): 997-1035.
Ulrich, D. (1997): ‚Measuring Human Resources: An Overview of Practice and a Prescription for Results’, Human Resource Management 36(3): 303-320.
UNCTAD (2007): Foreign Direct Investment Rose by 34% in 2006, UNCTAD http://www.unctad.org/templates/webflyer.asp?docid=7993&intItemID=1528&lang=10,6/05/2007.
Vaishampayan, D. (2006): ‘Making the Most of India and its Manpower’, Worldlink 16(4): 2-3.
Wernerfelt, B. (1984) ‘A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm’, Strategic Management Journal 5(2): 171-180.
Worldbank (2007): Doing Business, India, http://www.doingbusiness.org/ExploreEconomies/?economyid=89, 17/08/07.
Wright, P.M., Dunford, B.B. and Snell, S.A. (2001) ‘Human Resources and the Resource-Based View of the Firm’, Journal of Management 27(6): 701-721.
Wright, P.M., Snell, S.A. and Dyer, L. (2005) ‘New Models of Strategic HRM in a Global Context’, International Journal of Human Resource Management 16(6): 875-881.