How to Prepare for a Federal Monitoring Visit
(SASA/OSEP)
Jennifer S. Mauskapf, [email protected]
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLCwww.bruman.comSpring Forum 2013
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC1
AGENDA
• Overview of the Monitoring Process– SASA – OSEP
• Preparing for a Monitoring Visit
• Common Findings
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 2
OVERVIEW OF THE MONITORING PROCESS
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 3
SASA Monitoring Covers…
• New to 2012-2013: ESEA Flexibility Monitoring• SASA Monitoring for Select Non-Flex States:
– Title I, Part A– Title I, Part D (Neglected, Delinquent, or At-Risk)– Title X, Part C (McKinney-Vento Act/Homeless
Program)– Title III, Part A
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 4
Non-Flex Selection Factors2012-2013
• SEA has not been monitored since the 2006-2007 or 2007-2008 monitoring cycle
• Review of Audits and Previous Monitoring Findings
• Staff Leadership Turnover or New Staff
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 5
Monitoring Strategies, 2012-2013
• Pre-site document reviews• SEA and LEA website reviews• Previous corrective actions• Combination of program specific—
– Desk– Teleconference / Videoconference– Web-based conference– On-site monitoring review of indicators
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 6
OSEP ‘Monitoring’ Covers…
• Continuous Improvement Visits http://therightidea.tadnet.org/assets/browse_by_folder?folder=36&folder_name=OSEP+Continuous+Improvement+Visits
– Results Component http://www2.ed.gov/about/offices/list/osers/osep/rda/index.html
– Stakeholder Input Process– Verification Component
http://therightidea.tadnet.org/assets/browse_by_folder?folder=61&folder_name=CrEAGs-+Part+B
• Determinations. State Performance Plan (SPP) / Annual Performance Report (APR) Review
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 7
Prior to Visit
• Desk monitoring of each State– State contact gathers and analyzes data and
information– Information collected primarily through Web-
based searches and document analysis– Specific documentation requested from SEA
• Selection of LEAs• Receipt of Agenda and List of ED Participants
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 8
The Visit Itself
– HOW LONG?• Typically one full week
– WHAT WILL ED BE DOING DURING THE VISIT?• Review documentation not available prior to the trip • Interview SEA and LEA staff, principals, teachers, parents,
and other stakeholders • Exit Conference
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 9
Post-Visit – SASA-specific DRAFT comprehensive monitoring report issued
To be issued within 35 business days of the on-site visit SEA has 5 business days to review and provide technical edits
and corrections FINAL report issued SEA Response
SEA has 30 business days to respond to any required actions SASA sends a letter approving proposed
actions or requiring revision/further action May require close collaboration (e.g., CAPs)
and/or follow-up visits Significant compliance findings can lead
to special conditions
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 10
TOP 10 WAYS TO PREPARE FOR A MONITORING VISIT
Preparation is the Key!
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 11
1. Organizational Meeting
• Meet with Key Personnel
• All about Communication!– Discuss program and areas that will be
reviewed
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 12
2. Select Main Visit Contact
• 1 Main Visit Contact– Schedule meetings– Ensure lead personnel schedules clear– Organize travel requests / information (as
requested by SASA)– Schedule visits to schools (as requested by SASA)
• Schedule conference calls with SASA prior to visit
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 13
3. Select Main Interview Contacts• A representative should be appointed as lead
interviewer for each program (and topic) as appropriate– Title I, Part A– Title I, Part D – Neglected, Delinquent or At-Risk– Title X, C - McKinney-Vento– Title III, Part A– SIG– IDEA Results
• These representatives must know who should be present for each indicator and where all documentation is located!
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 14
4. Select Meeting Place
• Want meeting place separate from main offices so that all parties can remain focused– Don’t completely isolate
• All personnel should have cleared scheduled and be ready to participate as necessary– Organized by the applicable lead contact
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 15
5. Complete Monitoring Documents
• Complete the Actual Monitoring Document the Monitors will be using!
• Put your best foot forward• Narrative Form
– How?– Answer the Question Being Asked!– Respond to correct fiscal year!
• Include Specific Citations as appropriate.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 16
5. Complete Monitoring Documents (cont.)
• OSEP: Critical Elements Analysis Guide (CrEAG) Part B– Gen. Supervision– Fiscal Systems
• SASA Monitoring Plan for Formula Grant Programs– SIG: Application Process, Implementation, Fiscal, Technical
Assistance, Monitoring, Data Collection– Title I Team
• Title I-A Fiduciary• Title I-D• McKinney-Vento
– Title III-A: Monitoring of Subgrantees; Standards, Assessments & Accountability, Instructional Support, Fiduciary
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 17
5. Complete Monitoring Documents (cont.)
• OSEP’s CrEAG Format
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 18
Critical Element General Supervision (GS)-1: Does the State have a general supervision system that is reasonably designed to identify noncompliance in a timely manner using its different components? Related Question Response A. Describe the components and data sources
of the State’s general supervision system and how they are used to identify noncompliance (e.g., database, self-assessments, desk audits, on-site monitoring, dispute resolution, etc.).
Notes:
Document Review
Notes:
State Monitoring Manual Monitoring Reports Training Calendar
Database Reports APR Indicator 15
Customer Service Info. Notes:
OGC Comments Notes:
Interview Info. Interview Summary Related Requirements 34 CFR §300.100 [Eligibility for assistance] 34 CFR §300.149(a)&(b)[SEA responsibility for general supervision] 34 CFR §300.149(a)&(b)[SEA responsibility for general supervision] 34 CFR §300.200 [Condition of assistance] 34 CFR §300.600 [State monitoring and enforcement] 34 CFR §300.601 [State performance plans and data collection] 34 CFR §300.602 [State use of targets and reporting] 20 U.S.C. 1232d(b)(3)(GEPA)
5. Complete Monitoring Documents (cont.)
• SIG Format
• Title I & Title III Team Format
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 19
6. Organize Documentation
• Corresponding Binders– Tabbed!– Organized!– Complete Examples!– Connect-the-Dots!
• Copies for yourself • Include any additional
documents given to SASA during the visit
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 20
7. Mock Visit
• Practice Makes Perfect! (sort of)• Take the monitoring instrument and review
the current system in place• Interview selected personnel (“test”)• CONDUCT PRIOR TO VISIT
– Chance to change systems as needed!– Chance to create corrective action plans and begin
implementation as needed!
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 21
8. Be Prepared to Address Noncompliance
• Be prepared to address any corrective action plan already created or implemented.
• If no corrective action plan then attempt to create a plan prior to SASA’s arrival.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 22
9. Review Findings From Your State
• Review old monitoring reports• Special Conditions• State Plans
– Did you complete everything you said you would?
• Review audits– Including A-133 Single Audit
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 23
10. Review Monitoring Findings In Other States
• Title I & Title III Reports (2011-2012): http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/monitoring/reports12/index.html
• SIG Reports: http://www2.ed.gov/programs/sif/monitoring/index.html
• OSEP Continuous Improvement Letters: http://www2.ed.gov/fund/data/report/idea/partbvvltr/chrondate.html
• Review reports to identify focus areas, trends in findings.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 24
COMMON FINDINGS ACROSS THE BOARD
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 25
Written Policies and Procedures
• Conflicting policies• Out-of-date policies• Non-existent policies
If you have to explain how something is done without being able to point to a clear and current written policy or procedure, you probably have some work to do!!!
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 26
Notification Requirements
• Timeliness• Required Items• Public Reporting• Examples:
– Title I-A: Annual LEA Report Card, HQT Status Letter, School Improvement Status, SES and Choice Notice
– Title III: Student Identification, AMAO Determination– IDEA: Procedural Safeguards, Stakeholder Input for
SPP/APR
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 27
Fiduciary
• Timely review and approval of LEA applications • Timely allocation of subgrants• Period of availability of funds to LEAs• Process for Reallocating Funds• Timely Obligation and Liquidation
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 28
Fiduciary
• Ensuring Funds are Used for Allowable Uses– Consistent with Federal Cost Principles? – Consistent with EDGAR?– Consistent with program-specific rules?– How does SEA/LEA ensure and document
allowability?• Program-specific Fiscal Rules
– MOE – Supplement not Supplant– Caps
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 29
Fiduciary – High Dollar Areas of Concern
• Procurement• Property / Inventory Management• Time Distribution
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 30
EDGAR Procurement Rules
• Section 80.36 of EDGAR• All procurement transactions must be
conducted with full and open competition• Conflict of Interest:
– Must have written code of conduct for all employees engaged in contract award and administration
• Must have protest procedures to handle disputes
• Follow Procurement Rules!!!
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 31
Inventory Management: Common Problems
• Determining between “equipment” and “supply”
• Determining level of control over item
• Tracking non-equipment items
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 32
Equipment Rules
• Section 80.32 of EDGAR• Must have adequate controls in place to account for:
– Location of equipment– Custody of equipment– Security of equipment
• Property records– Description, serial number or other ID, title information, acquisition
date, cost, percent of federal participation, location, use and condition, and disposition (if applicable)
• Physical inventory– Must be performed at least every 2 years
• Control system to prevent loss, damage and theft– All incidents must be investigated
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 33
Equipment Rules (cont.)
• Must protect against unauthorized use– May use for other projects as long as use is incidental and
does not interfere with authorized use
• When property is no longer needed, must follow disposition rules:– Transfer to another federal program– Over $5,000 – Keep or sell, but must pay a share based on
the percentage of federal ED participation at initial acquisition
– Under $5,000 – May keep, sell, or dispose of it with no obligation to ED
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 34
Supplies• Section 80.33 of EDGAR• Supplies are everything else
– Do not cost much money– Used fairly quickly
• Examples: pens, paper, toner, laptops• EDGAR does not set out any specific tracking
requirements• As a practical matter, ED expects subgrantees to track all
property purchased with federal funds, in order to prove there has been an allocable benefit to the federal program
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 35
Time Distribution
• Selected Items of Cost: Salaries and Wages– Allowable if proper time distribution records
• Time Distribution Records must be maintained for all employees whose salaries are: – Paid in whole or in part with federal funds– Used to meet a match/cost share requirement
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 36
Time Distribution – Common Problems
• Proper Identification of “Cost Objective(s)”• Completion of Required Documentation
– PAR vs. Semi-annual Certification– Correct Signatory?– Correct Time Period?– Time reported add up to 100% time worked?– Signed after-the-fact?
• Quarterly Reconciliations
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 37
Equitable Services
• Timely and Meaningful Consultation• LEA Maintaining Control
– Program – Funds—no reimbursement!– Property—tags, inventory
• Evaluation of Services• Identification of Eligible Students• Administration Costs NOT Charged Against
Equitable Services Set-AsideBrustein & Manasevit, PLLC 38
Subrecipient Monitoring
• Comprehensive Monitoring Protocol• Follow-up procedures to ensure corrective
actions taken to address compliance issues• Linking Monitoring Findings with Technical
Assistance
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 39
RESOURCES - SASA ESEA Flexibility Monitoring http://www2.ed.gov/policy/elsec/guid/esea-flexibility/monitoring/index.html SASA Monitoring
http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/monitoring/index.html Indicators (2011-2012) http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/monitoring/indicators1112.pdf Title I & Title III Reports (2011-2012):
http://www2.ed.gov/admins/lead/account/monitoring/reports12/index.html NASTID Presentation on SASA Monitoring for 2012-2013http://www.nationaltitleiassociation.org/resource/resmgr/t12s/2012-
2013_overview_sasa_moni.pdf Office of School Turnaround – SIG Monitoring
SIG Monitoring Plan http://www2.ed.gov/programs/sif/sigmonitoringplan2012-2013.pdf SIG Reports:
http://www2.ed.gov/programs/sif/monitoring/index.html
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 40
RESOURCES - OSEP
Continuous Improvement Visit Page http://therightidea.tadnet.org/assets/browse_by_folder?folder=36&folder_name=OSEP+Continuous+Improvement+Visits OSEP Continuous Improvement Letters:
http://www2.ed.gov/fund/data/report/idea/partbvvltr/chrondate.html
Part B SPP and APR Determination Letters: http://www2.ed.gov/fund/data/report/idea/partbspap/allyears.html
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 41
Questions?
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 42
This presentation is intended solely to provide general information and does not constitute legal advice.
Attendance at the presentation or later review of these printed materials does not create an attorney-client
relationship with Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC. You should not take any action based upon any information in this
presentation without first consulting legal counsel familiar with your particular circumstances.
Brustein & Manasevit, PLLC 43
Disclaimer