8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
1/23
H E E Iy?
Extent and Structure of Connental Idencaon in Global
Comparison Using SEM
Jh R
No. 19 | November 2010
Working Paper
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
2/23
2 | KFGWorking Paper No. 19| November 2010
KFG Working Paper Series
Edited by the Kolleg-Forschergruppe Th Tv P E
Th KFG W P S h h l h Kolleg-Forschergruppe y h
ll l. I h xh ll h x
h l xl E h E U.
All KFG W P ll h KFG .. l
-@-l..
Cyh h : Jh R
El : Jl S, F Ah, Thy Iz C Blh
R, Jh 2010: H E E I? Ex S Cl I
Gll C SEM, KFG W P S, N. 19, N 2010, Kolleg-Forschergruppe (KFG) Th
T P E, F U Bl.
ISSN 1868-6834 (P)
ISSN 1868-7601 (I)
Th l h y h G Rh F (DFG).
F U Bl
Kll-Fh
Th T P E:
Th E U h D I
Ih. 26
14195 Bl
Gy
Ph: +49 (0)30- 838 57033
Fx: +49 (0)30- 838 57096-@-l.
..
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
3/23
How european is european identification? | 3
How European is European Identification?
Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global
Comparison Using SEM
Jochen Roose
F Uv B
Abstract
E h ly xl y h l h y h E
, y l l x y h ll
ll . All h xl ly h h
l x h l h
. Th l h h ll
Il Sl S P (ISSP) ll ly E .
Th l h h, ly, h x l E hh h
h . Sly, hy l h h h E
hly, l q l (SEM) h, h
l l ll . Aly, xl E
h ly h EU q y h . E
E ll . Cl l y h hE .
Th Ahr
Jochen Roose ly E h
F U Bl. H h h S C Bl
Sl Rh, h Uy J, h Uy Lz,
h h F U 2004. H h
ly E , ll ly, ll ly
h l h. C: jh.@-l.
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
4/23
4 | KFGWorking Paper No. 19| November 2010
Cnts
1. I 5
2. Why Pl Iy h E - Thy 6
3. D 9
4. Cl I h Wl 9
5. E I T 12
6. S-Sl D Cl I 14
7. Cl 17
L 20
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
5/23
How european is european identification? | 5
1. I1
E , l l E, , y y , E.2
Aly, h E E . H,
l h l h h q: I
h E, x -l , h h h
? Th E U (EU) h q l h E
ly l ll y x x l
h E . Th, l x E ly
l ll .
Thh y h h l l E y h EU h E
lhh h ly h y h E , y
q h E E .
Th h E hy l
ly- l. I h x l h E U h
E , h l hly ( .. B 2006; Fh
l. 2009; Kl/K 2006; Khl 2000; ML 2007; N 2006; R 2007). A
h h ll y l ll y (E 1975; l
Fh 1999, 2002), h h. H, h h h lly
E. Exl h l h E U h h
y hh h l h
h. Wh l y l ll ly h
. Oly ll ll hh h E EU-
hh ll h l hh h
l, h ly h E y xl h ly h EU
.
Th l h q h ly h ll
. F, hh hl x l
E -h h
h l (2). A y h (3), h h ly
h ll h (4). Th h
l l E (5). Thy, hh h
1 Th h y y h Th
T P E, z y h Kll-Fh (KFG) Th T P
E, h h F U Bl. Th KFG y h G Rh F (DFG)
h h h h EU l xl l. F h
l l ...
2 E h h E y ( l). I
ly h l l h . Oh h E y
h h l E l E h h l( B/C 2000). H, I lly h h h
h .
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
6/23
6 | KFGWorking Paper No. 19| November 2010
ll , y h -l ly, h l h
hh l . Th l ly h
l ll . H, hh h l
E l ly h EU ll, hh
h h h l h h l ll (6).
2. Why P Iy h E - Thy
T xl h x E h l qly h
h EU ly l h EU. Th y xl hy hhly ll
x hh ll l E h hy h
-h h l E y h h hl
E ll.
Th l h l. O h h h
l h h EU y h E. E
h EU l. Th h l l x hl
h E h l E . Flly,
h h E h h ll yl
l h l.
Thh ly h E y, y h E C (
3), h h h l h hh , l
hh h h E (D/M B 2009; Dh/F
1995; Fl 2008: 138). A l h h h l h
l E . Thy h h h h
h E hy h l h h
hl h :
the most privileged socioeconomic groups are the most European. Owners, managers, professionals,
and other white collar workers are more likely to think of themselves as Europeans than are blue-collar
workers or service workers. Educated people, regardless of occupaon, are also more likely to see
themselves as European, and young people are more likely to do so than older people, as are people
with higher incomes. All these groups have opportunies to interact with people from other European
countries(Fl 2008: 145; l .. Ill/Sh 1997: 34).
Th ly h l. Th l h EU l l
h l, hy l h ll
. Th l h l h h EU ( .. A/
Klhl 1996; Eh/Dl 2007; Gl 1998).3 I l l , h
hl ly , h h
3 Mhl O (Mhl/O 2006: 26) h Thy Pl Bh (Ajz 1991; Ajz/Fh
1980) h hl l h .
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
7/23
How european is european identification? | 7
y h h l ly h EU ( .. My 2004, 2007). Th EU l
h h l . A, h h
h h h y l EU l h
h hl x h h h EU. A h
h EU l, hl x h h h ly
h EU h hl h h , h h
l , l l x l , h l .
Ah h h x lly l.
A h , h q x l l
h l h hl E y. Th (Pl 1999;
l R 2010: 205; Sh 1997; Sh l. 2003) h l lly ly
h . I h l l h l
h EU l h (Fl 2008; M 2007; M l. 2008). Th hyh All (1954) h l (Hz 1990; Szzy/Uy 2002)
hl . A, h h EU l ly h h
U l hl x hh ll h
E ly, hl l h x y l h .4
Th y hh y EU
E y. Th E C l xh y
l , h , l, y l l . Th l-
-l j xh (INTERREG) l
h E y l E.
A h h E yl (Cll 1996: 270). F h
l , h l h yl
ll y (A 1991; H 1991; Hh/Sh 1994;
Sh 1991; Tlly 1975). A Gll (1968: 168) : Nl h
l-; h hy x. Th h h
h yl, l hl x, h, hhlh h hl
( h) h y. Thy h
, hh l h , h l h
, H (1983) ly h .
S h y h y h y h EU. F xl,
h EU h h Bh O Jy, hh lly ly h h
x. Th 9h My E Dy, R Sh h l 1950
4 Oh l y l ASEAN NAFTA l h x h h EU
. O h h h l h l
l . Th US-Mx , hh h j l h
(Mz 1998; P 1998; P 2007: 51). H, h l h l
lllly. Th, h hl ly l . Al, h h EU ll (hh lly), xl lly h EU
l l l, hh h lly h l l ll hl.
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
8/23
8 | KFGWorking Paper No. 19| November 2010
E Cy Cl Sl hh lh . I y E
h l h . Th E h ly EU
yl (lhh lly h yl h Cl E).5 Th EU y y
l l h y ll yl . H, E hy
l h h ll h q l. A H
E Hy l l h h Bl h h xh. B h
h ll E hy l h l
E hy l hl yh y
l (K 2007; L 2009; S 2006). I h UNESCO My
h Wl, hh ll ll h hl ly ll l,6 we
l hh l l E ll, h ll E
yl h h l Bh Nh Syhy (hh l E
h O Jy). Th h hl ll E ll h
l l, h l , h h E hl y l (Zl 2006).
W h l x E lly E
x l l . A h l
h h EU, ll llly- y h EU h E
, hl x hh ll l h l
EU - E, ll h
h l h l h. Ally, hl x
l l y ly h E, h hhly
h l , h h l
ly h EU. Th l h h l l h
lly- l lly h h h l
. Th h EU ly hh l
l x h .7 Th, hl x h l y
h E EU , l l x,
-EU ( -EFTA) h .
5 Th EU y 92 E 91 l y h h yl h EU
(E 65). 33 E h h EU h h lhh hy
h (E 64). M, .. 41 h E, h h E Dy,
hy h l (E 62).
6 Sl- h W UNESCO j My h Wl.
7 Th E F T A (EFTA) E h l
h h h EU. Th l Ny, Il, Szl Lh.
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
9/23
How european is european identification? | 9
3. Data
Rh E h h E . Th
E (EB) y lly y h E C ll
( l ). I h y hly 1,000
(h h U K Gy Lx Ml). Th
y 1970 1976 hy l lly. B lly h
q h ly l h E
. A h h q h h , ly
ll. H, y hl l. Th h
h EB h q EU .8
Ah l q h : h Il Sl
Sy P (ISSP). Th ISSP y y h l. Th y 2003,
h l y, h 29 .9 Th q
l h : H l y l []? h h y
l, l, y l, ll l.10
By h l, l h -
h . G h ly. Pl
lz y l . I h l
z-z h y, hy h h y.
Pl y h l T (Gz/T 1996),
h Il S Cl O (ISCO-88) . Eh h y ll hl l y l .11
4. C I h W
Th q h . T hh h x
h hh EU h h EU, l h q
h l y l, l, y l l ll h . Tl
1 h h q y h EU h.
8 Thh h l h ly h, ll l lyz h l
E ( 5).
9 F l h y : h://..////y-//l-y-/
l-y/2003/; l 3 N 2010.
10 Th l h 1 l ll 4 y l, .. hh l hh
.
11 F , l , , y h y 100.
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
10/23
10 | KFGWorking Paper No. 19| November 2010
Table 1: Feeling close to connent (ISSP, in %)
Cy C vy vy
N
A Europe 29,5 41,5 25,4 3,6 992D Europe 18,2 35,8 34,9 11,2 1255
Fl Europe 7,4 32,2 47,1 13,2 1211
F Europe 20,4 34,0 29,1 16,5 1522
Gy () Europe 10,2 46,9 36,9 6,0 401
Gy () Europe 13,3 47,9 33,1 5,6 803
G B Europe 4,5 22,7 41,2 31,6 813
Il Europe 10,8 33,7 38,6 16,9 1046
Pl Europe 26,0 41,9 25,7 6,4 1542
S Europe 17,3 60,6 17,2 4,9 1192
S Europe 14,2 34,5 41,8 9,4 1103
EU-15* 15,6 39,2 33,7 11,4
Czh Rl Europe 20,3 51,4 22,0 6,2 1204
Hy Europe 63,6 30,2 5,2 1,1 1007
L Europe 3,4 16,2 41,6 38,8 925
Pl Europe 19,5 43,5 32,3 4,7 1199
Sl Rl Europe 17,8 51,7 21,2 9,3 1047
Sl Europe 21,2 45,5 23,6 9,7 1057
EU-NMS-10 (2004)* 24,3 39,8 24,3 11,6
Bl Europe 32,4 40,1 17,7 9,8 950EU-NMS-2 (2007) 32,4 40,1 17,7 9,8
Ny Europe 19,7 40,2 33,0 7,1 1322
Szl Europe 20,7 58,3 18,9 2,1 1031
EFTA ( EU)* 20,3 49,3 26,5 4,6
R (E ) Europe 2,9 8,3 30,8 58,1 2039
E ( EFTA) 2,9 8,3 30,8 58,1
C Nh A 19,2 44,0 27,2 9,6 1031
U S Nh A 27,1 38,4 27,5 7,0 1165
Nh A* 23,1 41,2 27,4 8,3
Chl Sh A 36,0 36,5 21,6 6,0 1467
Uy Sh A 22,3 32,2 34,5 11,0 1089
Vzl Sh A 30,0 28,3 23,5 18,2 1162
Sh A* 29,4 32,3 26,5 11,7
Japan Asia 16,1 46,5 28,2 9,2 901
Sh K Asia 6,0 24,4 45,6 24,0 1286
Taiwan Asia 1,3 10,1 34,5 54,2 1827
A* 7,8 27,0 36,1 29,1
Sh A A 38,7 31,4 19,2 10,7 2357
Africa 38,7 31,4 19,2 10,7
*All h .
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
11/23
How european is european identification? | 11
Th ll h E ly h l h EU.
A h h h 30 h l y l E G B
h h ly 5 l y l E. T h
h (y l l), Pl hh h A, hl B h
h ll . Th h l h l EU-15
l y l 16 l y l l 55 .
Sx l h E 2004. A h h h y
hy y h EU h ly x
l l l. Th l h
64 (Hy) 3 (L) l y l E. Th h
l y l l 24 , hh hh h h j
h l . A h l h
EU , h l ll, lhh h h l xl.12
I h EFTA hh h EU ( h ISSP -) h
ll l l E l h h ll h EU-15 . Ey h
h l y l E h hl h l l l
E. O h l h h h , hh l EU
EFTA , l h h y l h EU
ly EU . H, h lh h hh
EU .
Fl l E ly l q R, h ly ll E y
hh h EFTA h EU. Oly 3 l y l E ly h 8
l l E. F h l l l h y
h E (l y l h EFTA ) h y l
h EU h . Th R h l h E h l .
H, R ly h y ll h l . A l E
h h l, h h lly.
Th hh ll l Sh A, h 39 l y
l A h 31 l l A. Al Sh A h
h y hh. I Chl, 36 l y l Sh A h 37
l l h . Th Vzl l (y l: 30 ,
l: 28 ), h h l l y l Vzl ll hh h y EU-
15 . I h EU, ly Hy, h xlly hh 64
l y l E,13 h h .
12 Dz M (2003) h h -h y h EU E h y-
h ly h l l xl .
13 A l q h h h EB. Pl h h hy l h E U ( E!) h h y h, ly h, y h
ll h. I Hy, h h h h l y h h E U y
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
12/23
12 | KFGWorking Paper No. 19| November 2010
I l l h h l h l l. A
h y h l h T h R. I h h hl
h l l ll l . Oh hh h
h l ll l h h Il ( h Jh ll
h A) Sh K, l h EU. 32 h Bh ll l
l E 39 L y h hy ll l l E.
T h h h l l h E
lly h l h h EU y ly h E h l lh h
h .
B y h EU l , y l
y , hll h hyh h
.
5. E I v T
Th l y xl hy h EU h h () h
E y ll h h x ll . W l
h h EU ly h E h l l E
h h ll h 2003 y ly h l h . Th
l ll h l E xly l ll
l . I , h h l h h ly
E h hl h 20h y h . Oly E
h ly l h h h ll. Sll, h l
xl h ly l l l h
l h y l ly.
W h l h y h h h EU, h
E Cl Sl Cy, h ly 1950. H, hl
h h h h h EU h E
h h y l h . Th l j
h h C Dj l y h E C J 1979 h
y h E C ll h Wh P h l 1985
( .. P/B 1999: 60). Exh h ERASMUS INTERREG
h 1990. Th E h, h E Dy h E h 1985
1986 ly, h h M ly ll h y 2000. L, h hh l
h y y EU ly h 1990 h.
S h l hh h EU hl h h
h l (53.6 ). R Bl h 28.5 . Thh h q xlyh h ISSP, hh h EU E h j, h l
h l h xl Hy.
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
13/23
How european is european identification? | 13
h h 1980 h l, ly hl h ll
.
F h E h h l E . D
h l E h , h l h
y .
I h 1990 q hh h h h/h l h
h/h l E.14 F 1 h h l
h q.
Figure 1: Self Concept: European vs. Naonal 1992 to 2004
14 Th : I h , ll y yl h h Naonalityly, Naonality
E, E Naonality, E ly. Th h h hq, hl h l h h x h E
hl l h h h q.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
National
National + European
European + National
European
1.19
92
2.19
93
2.19
94
1.19
95
2.19
95
2.19
96
1.19
97
1.19
98
2.19
98
2.19
99
1.20
00
2.20
00
2.20
01
1.20
02
2.20
02
1.20
03
2.20
03
1.20
04
2.20
04
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
14/23
14 | KFGWorking Paper No. 19| November 2010
I h y 1992 2004 h E .
A 40 h EU l, lhly 1996 2000, hl
ly h ly. M h h hl l h Nly h
l E h, hl ly hl E Nl, E
ly. A E , y h l ll
h l y h h E , .
Th l l h l h h q. I h EB
h hy l ly l l E, h h ,
l . Ch 1982 2005 h hh ly
1982 h l . I 1982, 17 h
h hy l E; 1992 h h ll 13 . By 2005 h
19 . I h h (l ) h h j ll. Th q,
h, l h h, l , l E h ly 1980. Rh, E ,
h q, h y l .15 Th, l h ly h h
x E h l l y l l
ll. I, l h h x E h EU l
E h h l l h l.
6. S-S D C I
TB h x l , l hl x
l -h h. A
(2), h h EU h hhly h hh l hl y h
E l x h l l , h h
, hl h l lly h y h
l . Th hl l h EU.
W h ISSP - 2003 h -
h l h h l . Ph l l l
h h ly l l.16
F 2 ly l h l. Th l , , ,
l h h l. S
h l x hhly l. O ,
15 S l h ly y Dh F (Dh/F 1995) h , ll Fl
(2008: 141).
16 D l h , h ll h
xl h ly: Vzl, T, N Zl, Sh A, Chl, Il, Al hPhl. Gy lyz ly E W.
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
15/23
How european is european identification? | 15
ly lly . Ally, x h ,
h x , l h l ll.17
Figure 2: Path Analysis for the Closeness Felt to Ones Connent: Theorecal Model
Wh hl x h h -
h l l h EU h EU? F,
hl x h l l h x h ll .18 Sly,
hl x h l h EU l h h .
Ily hh, l l ll h x h (
3). Th l y, hh l h h y h
l lyz.19
17 Th l h l h h l. Th
h h l l hl .
18 F h l h h ly, h h h l (ql
ly) ql ll , .. y l.
19 Th ll : RMR=0.021, GFI =0.982 (l hhl >0.95), AGFI=0.960 (>0.90), CFI=0.942(>0.90), NFI=0.932 (>0.90), RMSEA=0.013 (
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
16/23
16 | KFGWorking Paper No. 19| November 2010
Figure 3: : Path Analysis for Closeness Felt to Ones Connent: all countries with xed eects
Th h l h l h l , hh
y h h . Ally, l l y h h .20 A h y l h h .
H, h h 0.1 % ll. A h l h
l hly N=25,000, hl h h ly hh
h ll. Th, q lly h h y
. Th y h E ( .. Dh/
F 1995; Fl 2008; Khl 2002). Wh l hh h h l
ll h h l.
T y h , l . Th l ll h
y EFTA . I h ll l lyz h h l, h ly 8 -EFTA
19 EFTA (h 20 l, Gy lyz ly E
W). T y l h hh h h l
l l h -EFTA h lyz h .
20 All h h 0.1 % ll ( 3).
Occupational
Prestige
Income
Age
Education
Male
Closeness
to Continent e1
e2
e3
e4
e5
e6
0,196
0,052
0,419
0,149
-0,021
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
17/23
How european is european identification? | 17
Table 1: Feeling close to connent (ISSP, in %)
Ml
EU-27
Ml
EU-15
Ml
-EFTA
RMR 0.024 0.023 0.061GFI 0.982 0.985 0.974
AGFI 0.963 0.968 0.946
CFI 0.942 0.950 0.919
NFI 0.929 0.938 0.909
RMSEA 0.016 0.019 0.030
Tl 2 h G F h l h l h
l EU-15 , h l h EU-27 h ll -
EFTA , h h x h l ll h hl l
. Th G F h EU-27 l qly h l
hh l h ll l. Th h h l h
h l lyz. Th l h h l EU (EU-15)
h h EU (EU-27). H, h G F h l
ll h -EFTA y ll lhly h h G
F h EU-27 h EU-15 . S h l h hl l ( F
2) h x -EFTA (hh C, J, R, Sh K, Uy h USA)
y l h l l EU .
Th h ly h h q lly h h h -h l
, , , EU l l h
h -EU . Th hl ll h y h EU
E y , h h h l EU-15 h.
7. C
Th EU q h h l. I h h lh
ll y. Th ll hl y
h l-y E z. Th l ly hl
x h ll l.
Th h l h E y l h h EU. H,
h l E l h h lh h h ly . Th l h h h h
lly E q l.
C x h l h l ll y l; RMR - R M Sq
Rl; GFI - G F Ix (l hhl >0.95); AGFI - Aj G F Ix (>0.90); CFI -
C F Ix (>0.90); NFI - N F Ix (>0.90); RMSEA - R M Sq E Ax
(
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
18/23
18 | KFGWorking Paper No. 19| November 2010
I hy, y ll h h ll E E
h EU. Th EU h l y y lly
ll l ll ll E , ll lh
E yl. S EU h l hl,
h hhly h j, l l y .
C h l l x h EU l y
ly h E h z lh h h .
Th h . Th ll h h h h ll l
l ll . Th y
h l h h . O , hh ll
l E h h h h hh
l y ly h h , Hy, Sh A, Chl
Vzl, .. h EU.
I , h - l
E h . All h l l h hh , hh , hh
l h l hh , l l h
. A l E .
Th l h l hll h l xl
h E. Th h xl E, l , y
l h E h h l h. I l l hl x hh ll h E hl
( ly h ly l)
EU h. Th h . Ply, h l l
, l hh l , hh h h hl (.
B/G 2004; Hz 1990; Hl 2002; M 2006; Szzy/Uy 2002). Th
lz, y Ilh (1970) Dh (1961), h
.
Th l l. Fly, xl h E hl
l l h . A h
l, h h E h h EU
l h hh l ll h l.
Sly, l zzl h h h EU l. A h E
l h h EU, E hl
l xl h h EU. I h l h EU hh l
E h hh h h l.
Thly, h E l h , h
l q. E , h EU
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
19/23
How european is european identification? | 19
EU l ( .. Fh l. 2009; R 2007), l . Th
z lly E y l ly l. E
j z h h EU, h E
l , ll ly l h ll ll l
ll E . I , h h y
yl y hl h h l .
Th h y l, hh h lly, h
lly h EU. Aly, h EU hl h
h ll hh lly .
Flly, h E y , , h E , hl
h y h EU. S hh h EU x y
ll h l h q E .
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
20/23
20 | KFGWorking Paper No. 19| November 2010
L
Ajzen, Icek 1991: Th hy l h, : Ozl Bh H DP 50: 2, 179-211.
Ajzen, Icek/Fishbein, Marn 1980: U A P Sl Bh, U SlR.
Allport, Gordon W. 1954: Th N Pj, C.
Anderson, Benedict1991: I C. R h O S Nl,L, N Y.
Anderson, Christopher J./Kaltenthaler, Karl C. 1996: Th y l . 1973-1993, : E Jl Il Rl 2: 2, 175-199.
Beck, Ulrich/Grande, Edgar2004: D lh E, F/M.
Brubaker, Rogers/Cooper, Frederic 2000: By Iy, : Thy Sy 29: 1, 1-47.
Bruter, Michael2006: Cz E? Th E y, B.
Cinnirella, M. 1996: A Sl Iy P E I, : Bll, G. M./Ly, E.(E.): Ch E I. Sl Pyhll Aly Sl Ch, Ox, 253-274.
Deutsch, Karl W.1961: Sl Mlz Pll Dl, : A Pll S R55: 3, 493-514.
Dez Medrano, Juan 2003: F E. A E I Gy, S, hU K, P, Ox.
Dub, Sbasen/Magni Berton, Ral2009: H D I I Nl E Iy?,: Fh, D/M-B, Rl/R, A (E.): E. I E l ll l, Ol, 73-90.
Duchesne, Sophie/Frognier, Andr-Paul1995: I h E Iy?, : Ny, O/S,Rh (E.): Pl O Ilz G, Ox, 193-226.
Easton, David1975: A R-A h C Pll S, : Bh Jl PllS 5, 435-457.
Eichenberg, Richard C./Dalton, Russel J. 2007: P-Mh Bl. Th T Cz S E I 1973-2004, : A Pl 42: 2, 128-152.
Fligstein, Neil2008: Elh. Th EU, E Iy, h F h EU, Ox.
Fuchs, Dieter1999: Th D Cl U Gy, : N, P (E.): Cl Cz.ll D G, Ox, 123-145.
Fuchs, Dieter2002: D Kz lh Kl: D Fz K Ah, : Fh, D/Rll, El/Wl, Bh (E.): B D O W. S z lh Kl z lh Pz, W, 27-49.
Fuchs, Dieter/Guinaudeau, Isabelle/Schubert, Sophie 2009: Nl Iy, E Iy E, : Fh, D/M-B, Rl/R, A (E.): E.I E l ll l, Ol, 91-112.
Gabel, Mahew 1998: Pl S E I: A El T F Th, :Jl Pl 60: 2, 333-354.
Ganzeboom, Harry B./Treiman, Donald J. 1996: Illy Cl M OlS h 1988 Il S Cl O, : Sl SRh 24, 201-239.
Hannerz, Ulf1990: Cl Ll Wl Cl, : Thy, Cl & Sy 7: 2, 237-251.
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
21/23
How european is european identification? | 21
Held, David 2002: Cl Pll Cy: Nl, Gll Cl, : V,S/Ch, R (E.): C Cl. Thy, Cx, P, Ox,48-58.
Hobsbawm, Eric J. 1983: I: I T, : H, E J./R, T (E.):Th I T, C, N Y, 1-14.
Hobsbawm, Eric J. 1991: N l 1780. P, Myh, Rly, C.
Hu, Lit-Tze/Bentler, Peter M. 1995: El Ml F, : Hyl, R H. (E.): Sl EqMl. C, I, Al, Th O .., 76-99.
Hutchinson, John/Smith, Anthony D. (E.) 1994: Nl, Ox, N Y.
Immerfall, Stefan/Sobisch, Andreas 1997: Eh I h I. DEh U B h B, : A Pl Zhh 47: B 10, 25-37.
Inglehart, Ronald1970: C Mlz E Iy, : C Pl 3: 1, 45-70.
Karolewski, Ireneusz Pawel/Kaina, Viktoria (E.) 2006: E y. Thl l h, Bl, M.
Kohli, Marn 2000: Th Bl E Iy, : E S 2: 2, 113-138.
Kohli, Marn 2002: D Eh h I: K Pl, : Kll,H/Kh, M/Sh-G, Alx (E.): Tl lh I 20. Jhh, F/M., N Y, 111-134.
Koe, Eugen 2007: I R h Z. Nl El Ghhh S II, I.
Langner, Carsta 2009: V E. Z K h I h R Shlh, S.
Marnez, Oscar J. 1998: B Pl. L Sy h U.S.-Mx Bl, T.
Mau, Steen 2006: Nllh Ez lh Pl. WZB DP P 2006-012, Bl.
Mau, Steen 2007: Tl Vllh. D Ez zl Ll,F/M., N Y.
Mau, Steen/Mewes, Jan/Zimmermann, Ann 2008: Cl hh l?, : Gll N. A Jl Tl A 8: 1, 1-24.
McLaren, Lauren 2007: Exl M-Ll E: Iy, I, Il D,: A Pl 42: 2, 233-251.
Meyer, Thomas 2004: D I E. D EU Sl?, F/M.
Meyer, Thomas 2007: D S zl D: A W z lh I EU, : N-Rl, Jl/Wl, W (E.): Eh I: Vz S, B-B, 153-168.
Mhler, Kurt/Opp, Karl-Dieter2006: R - N - E. D Dy l lI, W.
Nissen, Sylke 2006: E Iy h F E, : Bh, Mz/Lh, Ch/V, G (E.): E M. Sl Dy Pll I ElE, Bl, 155-174.
Peterson, John/Bomberg, Elizabeth 1999: D-M h E U, B, L.
Pickel, Susanne 1999: O Gz? Ell, K hl Whhh lh S, : Shl, H (E.): Gzl Gllh?29 K Dh Gllh Szl B II/1. S, Fh,A, Pl, 386-389.
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
22/23
22 | KFGWorking Paper No. 19| November 2010
Pries, Ludger1998: T l Ty A l-ll zl R.D Bl A zh Pl/Mx N Y, : Szl Wl49: 2, 135-150.
Pries, Ludger 2007: D Tl zl Wl: Szl j Nlllh, F/M.
Roose, Jochen 2007: D I B EU h W Azz Eh, : N-Rl, Jl/Wl, W (E.): Eh I:Vz S, B-B, 123-149.
Roose, Jochen 2010: Vllh E Bz. E lh S z B zl I, W.
Schmidberger, Marn 1997: R h L. D E l Ul Blll z EU, F/M.
Schmidt, Peter/Davidov, Edgar2006: Sl Eq Ml: Thy, Al Ex h B Ml, Kl.
Schmidt, Siegmar/Tenscher, Jens/Weber, Andrea 2003: M Hz V? Z Azz h Iz Slz, : Bh, F/Dh, J /Rll, El (E.): Eh I lh M, Ol, 83-113.
Seidendorf, Stefan 2006: V Vh? E E Fh Dhl, : Sh, Mh/S, S (E.): Rh V. Illll zh N E, Hl, 263-289.
Smith, Anthony D. 1991: Nl Iy, L ..
Szerszynski, Bronislaw/Urry, John 2002: Cl l, : Th Sll R 50: 4,461-481.
Tilly, Charles (E.) 1975: Th F Nl S W E, P.
Zingerle, Arnold2006: D lll Gh E, : Hl, R/Mll, H-P (E.):D h Gllh, Kz, 87-108.
8/22/2019 How European is European Identity? Extent and Structure of Continental Identification in Global Comparison Using
23/23
Th K-Fh - E A Eh
Iv Rh
Th Kll-Fh (KFG) l-h y h G Rh F 2008. I - h KFG lly l
hh h l h y h ll j h.
Th Kll-Fh Th T P E h h E h Bl-B- lz h h h - h . I x h l h EU - , lyz h h l xl h h :
Iy h Pl Sh
Cl, Cly By
C Rl E Exl Rl